january 7, 2015 proposed final report: gas vapor regulations the legislature’s decentralized...

14
January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current Regulations May Be Requiring Outdated Technology Zane Potter, JLARC Staff

Upload: dominik-tidmore

Post on 02-Apr-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

January 7, 2015

Proposed Final Report:Gas Vapor Regulations

The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current Regulations May Be Requiring Outdated Technology

Zane Potter, JLARC Staff

Page 2: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Federal Clean Air Act Regulates Air Emissions in the United States

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 2/14

Gasoline vapors are a source of ground-level ozone (smog) which poses a risk to human health and the environment

Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for establishing air quality standards and regulations

Federal Act gives states flexibility in how to organize themselves to meet EPA’s standards and regulations

Page 3: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Washington’s Clean Air Act Allows Decentralized Approach to Regulating Air Quality

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 3/14

Cowlitz 

Wahkiakum 

Clark 

Skamania 

Lewis Southwest

Clean Air Agency

Mason 

Clallam 

Jefferson

GraysHarbor

Thurston 

Pacific

Olympic Region Clean Air Agency

Snohomish

King

Pierce 

Kitsap

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

Grant 

WallaWalla 

Franklin 

Adams 

Lincoln

FerryStevens

PendOreille

 

Whitman 

Columbia 

Garfield 

Asotin 

Ecology: Eastern Regional Office

Spokane

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency

Yakima Yakima Regional

Clean Air Agency

SanJuan

Ecology: Northwest Regional Office

Whatcom

Skagit Island

 

Northwest Clean Air Agency

Kittitas 

Chelan

Okanogan 

Douglas

Ecology: Central Regional Office

Klickitat Ecology: Central

Regional Office

Benton 

Benton Clean Air Agency

Greyed areas = Tribal landsNote: EPA has authority over air quality issues on reservation lands

Page 4: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Washington Has Approximately 2,800 Gas Stations

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 4/14

Puget Sound1,300 stations

Northwest166 stations

Ecology416 stations

Spokane172 stations

Benton74 stations

Yakima103 stations

Olympic292 stations

Southwest334 stations

Page 5: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Key Points From Report

Agency fees, methodologies used to determine agency fees and inspection frequency varies

25 other states use a decentralized approach to regulating air quality

Washington’s current regulations may be requiring outdated technology that may increase emissions

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 5/14

Legislative Auditor recommends completing an analysis to avoid increasing emissions

Agencies: Concur OFM: Did not provide a response

Page 6: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems Capture Gasoline Vapors During the Refueling of Motor Vehicles

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 6/14

1990 federal legislation required Stage II in 27 states (including WA) to meet federal ozone standard

Costs $20K to $60K to install per station; $3,000 per year to maintain

Vapor

Liquid

Gas tank

Vapor recovery

nozzle

Coaxial hose

vapor

liquidvaporliquid

Page 7: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Stage II Systems Were Intended to Help Regions Meet the Federal Ozone Standard

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 7/14

Three agencies require Stage II systems at about 1,300 gas stations across seven counties:

Three agencies require Stage II systems at about 1,300 gas stations across seven counties:Puget Sound Clean Air Agency• Snohomish• King• Kitsap• Pierce

Ecology• Thurston• Cowlitz

Southwest Clean Air Agency• Clark

SNOHOMISH

KING

PIERCE

KITSAP

THURSTON

COWLITZ

CLARK

Page 8: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Onboard Refueling Vapor Recover (ORVR) Systems Also Capture Gasoline Vapor During Refueling of Vehicles

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 8/14

Federal legislation required EPA to adopt ORVR regulations for automobile manufacturers

This system was phased in for new vehicles beginning in 1998

Vapor

Liquid

Balance nozzle

ORVR canister

liquid

Gas tankvaporliquid

Page 9: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Some Stage II Systems Can Increase Emissions Because of New Technology In 2012 EPA no longer required stage II vapor

recovery systems to meet federal the ozone standard Stage II systems have become largely redundant because

more cars have ORVR Limited compatibility between ORVR systems installed on

cars and some Stage II systems may increase emissions EPA determination allowed, but did not require,

states to remove Stage II

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 9/14

Page 10: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Other States Taking Steps to Remove Stage II

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 10/14

NJNV

OR

WA

CAOHIN

TN

TX

WI

IL

GA

LA

AZ

PA

MEVT

CT RI

DEMD

NH

VAKYMO

NY

Has not determined when to remove Stage II

Completed analysis, determined that Stage II needed until about 2017

Completed analysis, will keep Stage II for at least another decade

Taking steps to remove Stage IINot completed Stage II analysisNo Stage II requirement

MA

Page 11: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Ecology and Local Agencies Have Not Determined When to Remove Stage II Ecology has yet to undertake emissions analysis Southwest completed an analysis in 2012, but

agency staff indicated that it was not shared with Board or made publicly available

Puget Sound completed two analyses; however, some factors are inconsistent with EPA guidance

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 11/14

JLARC staff estimated that Stage II systems could begin to increase emissions as soon as 2020 in Southwest and Puget Sound

Page 12: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Legislative Auditor Recommendation:Complete Emissions Analysis

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 12/14

The Department of Ecology and the local clean air agencies should estimate and publish when Stage II requirements will begin to increase emissions

This analysis should determine whether keeping Stage II systems helps the regions meet EPA’s current ozone standard and the costs and cost effectiveness associated with keeping these systems

Agencies: Concur OFM: Did not provide a response

Page 13: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Legislative Auditor’s Comment on Agencies’ Response

January 7, 2015Gas Vapor Regulations 13/14

There may be reasons to keep Stage II requirements for a limited number of gas stations in WA

The analyses conducted by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency had key shortcomings which were not acknowledged in the agencies’ response to the recommendation

Moving forward, Legislative Auditor urges any future analyses include factors that are consistent with EPA guidance and include cost considerations

Page 14: January 7, 2015 Proposed Final Report: Gas Vapor Regulations The Legislature’s Decentralized Approach Neither Requires nor Produces Consistency, and Current

Contact Information

Zane Potter, Research [email protected] 360-786-5194

Eric Thomas, Research [email protected]

Valerie Whitener, Project [email protected] 360-786-5191

www.jlarc.leg.wa.gov