japanese vs indian management practices

Upload: pravin-cumar

Post on 06-Apr-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    1/28

    Japanese VS Indian management

    practices

    Submitted by,

    Akram

    Nishanth

    Nithyananthan

    Partipan

    Pravin cumar.R

    Pravin raj

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    2/28

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    3/28

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    4/28

    Kaizen Mindset

    Everything can and should be improved Not a single day should go without some kind of

    improvement being made somewhere in thecompany

    Imagine the ideal customer experience and striveto provide it

    Dont criticize, suggest an improvement

    Think of how to improve it instead of why it cantbe improved

    Think beyond common sense. Even if somethingis working, try to find out work it even better

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    5/28

    SPECIAL FEATURES OF JAPANESE

    MANAGEMENT

    SCIENTIFIC SELECTION PROCESS

    LIFETIME EMPLOYMENT

    SENIORITY SYSTEM

    CONTINUOUS TRAINING

    EMPHASIS ON GROUP WORK

    DECISION MAKING

    COMPLICATED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

    FATHER LEADERSHIP

    GOOD BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES

    SIMPLE AND FLEXIBLE ORGANIZATION

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    6/28

    Very few Japanese attendgraduate school and graduatetraining in business.Percentage is small because

    there are only 30 top businesscolleges.

    Young people hired out ofschool and not experiencedpeople from other companies.

    Hardly any mobility of peopleamong companies

    1 ) SCIENTIFIC SELECTION PROCESS

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    7/28

    2) LIFE TIME EMPLOYMENT

    Lifetime employment refers to recruitment ofemployees immediately after graduation and keepthem in employment until retirement. Though there isno formal contract, employers and employees have

    an unwritten mutual understanding regarding theirexpectation about the job. Under lifetime employmentan employee spends his entire working life with asingle enterprise. This helps generate a feeling of job

    security in the employee and a feeling ofbelongingness towards the enterprise.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    8/28

    3) SENIORITY SYSTEM

    This concept is closely related to the concept of

    lifetime employment .Companies following this

    concept, provide privileges to older employees

    who have been with it for a long time.

    Promotion and wage increases are based on

    employees length of service in the company, not

    job performance.

    NENKO JORETSU

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    9/28

    4)CONTINUOUS TRAINING

    The secret of the success of Japanese

    managers may lie in continuous training" In

    western organizations, employees receive

    training only to acquire a new skill or to moveto a new position. In Japanese firms

    however,every young manager has a godfather

    ,who is never his boss or anyone in the direct

    line of authority. The godfather is not part ofthe top management, but is highly respected

    by others.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    10/28

    In most Japanese organizations, a task is notassigned to an individual; instead several tasksare assigned to a group, which consists of a

    small number of people are treated like familymembers. Kaisha means my or ones company

    the community to which one belongs andwhich is an important part of ones life.

    probably this is the reason why employees takegreat pride in their company and its success.

    5) EMPHASIS ON GROUP WORK

    KAISHA

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    11/28

    6) DECISION-MAKING

    The practice of managerial decision-making inJapan is built on the concept that change andnew ideas should come primarily from personbelonging to lower levels in the hierarchy. Thusin Japan lower level employees prepareproposals for higher-level personnel. The ringisystem refers to decision-making byconsensus. The word ringi consists of two parts

    rin which means submitting a proposal toones superior and getting his approval, and gimeaning deliberations and decisions.

    RINGI

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    12/28

    7)COMPLICATED PERFORMANCE

    EVALUATION

    When job description are not welldefined and when tasks are performedby groups, it becomes difficult to

    evaluate individual job performanceobjectively. The evaluation of workersand managers in Japanese corporationstakes a very long time up to ten years

    and requires the use of qualitative andquantitative information aboutperformance.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    13/28

    8)FATHER LEADERSHIP

    As a kacho ,the task of a leader is notonly to supervise his people at work, butalso to show fatherly concern for their

    subordinates private life. Since,promotion is based on seniority, it is noteasy to move on to a kacho position.Sufficient training and experience are

    essential for an individual to bepromoted to this position.

    KACHO

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    14/28

    9)GOOD BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES

    Japanese companies provide substantial benefitsto their employees.They are provided benefitssuch as family housing and transportationallowances. Some companies also provide

    bachelor accommodation, scholarships foremployees children, and low-interest housingloans. Salary enhancements become rapid afterabout seven years of employment with the firm.

    Since the seniority-based wage system assumesthat the longer the experience, the morevaluable the employee.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    15/28

    10)SIMPLE AND FLEXIBLEORGANIZATION

    In Japanese firms, very often people are

    trained to be generalists. For this reason,

    the organization structure in Japan is

    relatively simple flexible, and it possible

    for people to take up a new challenge or

    a new task by forming a new formal or

    informal group. Informal organizationposses considerable power in formal

    organization

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    16/28

    The flaws of the Japanese process:

    1. Too many people and sections are involved2. Too many meetings are held.

    3. The meetings are very long

    4. The delay of Business decision-making.

    5. The influence of the relationships betweenthe participants in the final decision.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    17/28

    JAPANESE MANAGEMENT

    1)Long term orientation

    2)Collective decision makingwith consensus

    3)Involvement of manypeople in preparing andmaking the decision

    4)Decisions flow bottom to

    top5) Slow decision making and

    fast implementation of thedecision

    1) PLANNINGJAPAN INDIA

    1. Decision making by the

    Top level management.

    2. Involvement of very fewpeople in the top.

    3. Decisions flow from top

    to bottom.

    4. Quick decision

    making.But slow inimplementation often

    requiring compromise.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    18/28

    Collective responsibilityand accountability

    Ambiguity of decisionresponsibility

    Informal organizationstructure

    Well-known commonorganization culture and

    philosophy; competitivesprit toward otherenterprises

    2)ORGANIZING

    JAPAN INDIA Individual responsibility.

    More Formal,bureaucratic

    organization structure. Less

    informal.Distinctness in decision

    making.

    Lack of common organizatio

    structure.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    19/28

    Young people hired out ofschool; hardly any mobilityof people among companies

    Slow promotion through the

    ranks Loyalty to the company

    Very infrequentperformance evaluation fornew employees

    Promotion base on multiplecriteria

    3) STAFFING

    JAPANINDIA

    Hiring both directly from

    colleges/B schools and also

    from other companies.Very

    frequent job changes.

    Promotion by performancean criteria.

    Performance evaluation for

    new employees is made

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    20/28

    Leader acting as asocial facilitator andgroup member.

    Paternalistic style Common values

    facilitating

    cooperation Bottom-up

    communication

    4)LEADING

    JAPAN INDIATop down

    communication.

    More like commanding

    stlyle.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    21/28

    5)CONTROLLING

    Control by peers

    Control focus on

    group performance Extensive use of

    quality control

    circles.

    JAPAN INDIAControl by superiors

    Control focus on

    individual

    performance.

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    22/28

    Where does INDIA and

    JAPAN stands along with

    the world according to

    Hofstedes cultural

    dimension:

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    23/28

    POWER DISTANCE INDEX:

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    24/28

    INDIVIDUALISM OR GROUP ORIENTED:

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    25/28

    UNCERTAINITY AVOIDANCE:

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    26/28

    Relationship orientation

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    27/28

    Management style comparison:

  • 8/2/2019 Japanese vs Indian Management Practices

    28/28

    Thank you..