jason marks nm public regulation commission february 6, 2009 2009 regulatory perspective lsi utility...

15
Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Upload: joan-mckenzie

Post on 05-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission

February 6, 2009

2009 Regulatory Perspective

                                         

                                   

                                         

LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Page 2: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Outline

• A Challenging & Rapidly Evolving Environment

• Supply Issues• Regional Transmission

Page 3: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Challenging and Evolving Environment – Fuel Price Volatility

Page 4: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Challenging and Evolving Environment: New Investment/Rate Base Increases

Page 5: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Challenging and Evolving Environment:Getting Serious about Climate Change

Page 6: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

The Cost of Addressing Carbon

Page 7: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

A different choice for new versus existing generation.

Fuel Cost For Current Coal and CC Gas w/ Carbon Value

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Carbon Value ($ / ton CO2)

$ p

er m

egaw

att-

ho

ur Existing CC w/ $8 gas

Existing CC w/ $6 gas

Existing Pulverized Coal

New pulv coal

Page 8: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Challenging and Evolving Environment:Economic Weakness

Page 9: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

New Mexico Confronts Supply Challenges: Energy Efficiency

Pub Svc N.M. - Energy Efficiency Savingsas a % of Total Retail Sales

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Pub Svc Co. NM - EE Savings

8,0008,5009,0009,500

10,00010,50011,00011,50012,00012,500

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

An

n. G

WH

s

Series2

Series1

Page 10: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

New Mexico Confronts Supply Challenges: Natural Gas/Renewables

Delta-Person – PPA 132 MW CT 2000

Afton – RB 235 MW CC Nov 2007

Valencia – PPA 148 MW CT Summer 2008

Lea Power Prtnrs – PPA

500 MW CC July 2008

Newman Five 288 MW CC May ’09 (CT)

May ’10 (CC)

Lordsburg

Luna

80 MW CT

190 MW CC

RB pending

EPE/eSolar PPA 64 MW Solar Thermal

2011

Page 11: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Cost of Service Issues at NM PRC

• Rate Case Redux– EPE Electric: June ’07 – June ’07 (S)– PNM Gas: May ’06 – June ’07 (L)– PNM Electric: March ’07 – June ’08 (L)– SPS Electric: July ’07- Aug ’08 (L)– PNM Electric: Sept ’08 – – SPS Electric: Early ’09 (?) – – Numerous complex water cases

• Utility Desire to Accelerate Rate “Relief” • Workshop on stipulations/partial stipulations• Utility legislative proposals

Page 12: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Executive Compensation

$0

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

Total Compensation for Top 5 ExecutivesNM IOU and Similarl-Sized Public Power Utilities

Page 13: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Addressing Regional Transmission Needs

Western Renewable Energy Zones Project:

www.westgov.org/wga/initiatives/wrez/comments.htmComments thru March 2, 2009

Page 14: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas

Addressing Regional Transmission Needs• NM, CO, WY, UT to sponsor

conference:– What laws permit or constrain the

ability of state regulators to engage in joint decision making with their counterparts in neighboring states?

– What legal principles guide state regulators in reconciling their traditional charge to protect jurisdictional interests with broader public interests at stake in multistate transmission projects and renewable energy development? \

ARIZONA

Tucson

Phoenix

Holcomb

NEW MEXICO

COLORADO

WYOMINGDave

Johnston

LRS

Albuquerque

Limon

Comanche

Lamar

Pawnee/Story

Socorro

Gladstone

Midway

SunZia

HPX

14

Page 15: Jason Marks NM Public Regulation Commission February 6, 2009 2009 Regulatory Perspective LSI Utility Rate Case Issues 2009 – Las Vegas