javed anwar, a077 044 013 (bia dec. 30, 2013)

8/13/2019 Javed Anwar, A077 044 013 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)

1/12

Mahmood, G.RFoley & Mhood PC9 HOOVER COURT, SUITE OOVER, AL 6

Nam: WAR, JAVED

Executive Oe r Imigraon Review

Bd Immigtn AplsOc h lk

5107 leburg Pik, Sut 2000Fas Church, Vrgna 0530

HS/CE Oice of Cief Counsel -TL Sprng Steet, Sute Atlanta, G

A 77-44-

Date of ths notice: / /

losd is a opy of h Bor's deciso a orer i he above-rerece cse.

cosr

dd R

Scerey,

D ctDoa Ca

Cf Ck

ocke

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Javed Anwar, A077 044 013 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)


2/12

US m Euv Ofe r Immiaton vw

Deon o he Bod of mgraon pp

Fals Curch, Vrga 5

Fle: A077 044 013 - tlanta, GA

In re JAVED ANWAR a.ka Jare Answar Bhil Glan

REMOVAL POCEEDGS

CERFICATON

Dae

ON EHAF OF SPODET GR Mahmood, Esquire

O EHAF O DHS Raal W DuncaAssisan Cief Cosel

PPICO Adjusment o satus

DEC 3 0 21

he spondet, ntve ad czn o Pkstn, appeals om mmgraton Jdge'sdecsion dated Janar 4, 201, dening s applcaion to adjust hs sats On Ma 7, 202, teBoard remandd ths case to the Immgrtion Jdge r a separae oral decision OnJne 24, 2013, the recor as ceed bck to the Board The apeal wil b dismssed

Upon rev, m he Imgton Jdges decision r he rasons staed erein Theresponent ars the brden o proo o estlish hat he s elgible r jusmen of stas,inclung that he s "grandtherd r prposes o establshng eligbl under secion 245()

o the Act We agree tat the respondent has not met this bden We aree ha becase thresponet rroneosl led hs labor cction plicaion (C n exas insa ofGeorgia, whe th etioning emploer as oced, he s not able o stsh hat hisapplcaion s pove he ed We note ha aprovabl when led means that s o hedte o ing, the abor cection was, mong oer things, propely l CFR§ 245 ((3 "Proerl ed eans, in h cse of LC, ha he aplicato as proerlled nd accepted purs to the reguatons of the Depen of abor (DOL) CR§ 24510(a(2(, cting 20 CFR § 65621 The respondent cites severl rovisions om eapplicble DOL relaions prportng to estabsh that h exas Workrce Commssion(WC), the DOs deegte r pocssg o CAs, lacked aor o rject his aplcationand ccl the nta pror dte ssiged o However, no o the cited reglator

rovsions drctl ddesses ths qston ad one overcome he clear povso in CR§ 245 I 2 tht ror ed C s o d ccodce th O rgltos Fom, t rsodet cts DOL gto ddessng crcmstces ee CA sdned d to lr to a pvng wage; th eglaton cearl sates that he C woldeed to b elled "s applcon CF § 6562e his reiremt necs,raher thn sppors, th esondens rgmn

hee lso s no bss, s respondent cotnds, r the Bord to apl nc pro tn rlie n ts c respodets sto o "gnc or s llnded, s he ntl C wndsptal ld n th wrong oce nd ths properl reected We also concde tha therespondet hs o esbshed a voto o de pocss

Cite as: Javed Anwar, A077 044 013 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)


3/12

' {

A07 044 013

Eective Juy 2 09, mition Judge who ats alien volt deparemst adise he lie t proof of pog of a bond with he Depe of Homelan Secymust be sbmited to the Bod of Immiaio Appels within 30 dys of lng ppe, d

ht the Bo l o reiste peod of voly epae i is n oe uess he ehs iely sbmited scit poof tht e ed ond hs ee poste. C.F R§ 406(c)(3) See Maer of Gero, 5 I&N Dc 64 A 0 The mmiaon Juge ovided he respodent wth he reqired adss d gt the responet 60-y vountay depe peio onditioned upon he posing of $500 bond Th ecod e e Bod however, does not eect th the respondent sbite iely roof f vng pa bon Therere, e volty depae peod wil o be einsted d the respodent wll e emove om he Unted Ses pust to e mitio Judge's tete oer

OE: The pea is dismisse

T OE The respondent is orde removed o the Ued Stes psu o he mmion Juges lee oer

( Q uCite as: Javed Anwar, A077 044 013 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)


4/12

ITD STATES DEPARTMN OF JUSTICEEXECTVE OFFC FOR IMMIGRATIO REVW

UID STAS MMGRATON CORT

ATANTA GORGA

e A077044013 Ju 21 2013

th Matter o

AVED AWAR

SPOD

CHARGES:

N REOVAL ROCEEINGS

Scon 237(a)(1 )(B) of th Imigatio and Natoaty Act asad n a ar adssio as a onmigra undr Sctio101 (a)(15) of th Act you hav rmaed th Utd States o a

t ogr tha ermte, i volaio of ths Act or any othr aw of the Utd States.

Seco 237(a)(1 )(C)(i) o t mgrao a atioaly Ac asaend tha af adissio as a o-imiga udr Secto01 (a)(15) of te Act you have fal to aita or coply wth thcontios o th nomgra staus udr whch you wreadtt

ACAIOS: adjustet of satus unr Sction 25() o the Imigation aNatoaity Act a in th altenatv posharing vountary eartue

BEHA OF RSPODENT GR MAMOOoey and Mahmoo, PC

1951 oovr C Sute 105oove A 35226

N BEHA O HS RAA W. A ASSSTANT IEF COUSEOfce of Chief Cousl180 Sg St, Site 332

Aanta GA 30303

1


5/12

ORA EISION O TE IGRATION UG

Te respondent s a mae native and ctizen of the country of akistan Tis

mater comes efore e out as the resu of a fiing of a otice o Apear on arc

18, 2003, ere e respoden as charged has havg been admited to the nited

States at Wasngton on or aot September 14, 1996, as a nonimmigrant

vistor ith authorzation to remain in the United States fr a temporary period not to

exceed arc 13 1997 and the te respondent reained n the nied States eyond

arc 13 1997, ithout autorzaton of the Immigraon and Naturaization Servce

urermore t s aeged and foud hat the respondent as employed fr ages or

oer comensaton from Aril 10, 2001, until arc 18, 2003 at arketplace 6 3990

E Wiliamsurg Road Sandsone Virgnia 2350 itout authorization of the

mmigraton and Naturalzation Service

Te respondent obtained counse and then at a prior aster alendar hearing

ed n the Aringon mmgratio out on ly 13, 200 the respondent admitted the

ie actual alegatios as conained n te Notice to Appear e to carges o

removablty as set forth terei ere sustaied and e resondent as fund to be

removable by cear and convncng evdence in accordance it the Act akstan as

designated as te country n e event an order of remova ecame ecessary At that

e te resondent ndicated by ad rough counsel a he ised to seek reve of

the dena o his adusent o status applicaon and in te aernative t as made

knon through counsel that e ould also seek vountary departure n the aternative

urher te ourt il note tat as prevousy noed in the earier transcripts of

ths case the fie has to some exent bee reconstruced ad e ourt as goe

throug ad marked te exhibits o try to make te record easier o idenfy those

exibts tat e ill talk aou n just a moment

A07704403 2 ue 21, 2013


6/12

Te atter before e Cour i o a legal ie tat beg t repodet

flg of a Dpatet of abor cerfcatio requet wc wa appropratl fid

i te wrog ae t wa iled i exa Deparet of Labor wh it ould ave be

e Georga Depart of abor ad tu e Cour a take up te otio to

reert wic te Cour ote wa ot repoded to eparatel b te repodt'

couel ad ultiatel reuld i te Iigrao Judge igig a ordr gratig e

oto to preeri ad placig te atter ack o t Court' docket fr a other relif

to whc te repodet ig be eligile at the prior ater Caldar hearig hld i

ti cae Tat beig te ater te Court wll ote a te rcord i a follow

DOCENTARY EVDENCE

Exibt No 1 a Noce o Appear wrei te repod adtted ad

coceded te factua allegatio ad carge puruat to te Notic to Appar Te

dae of tat ater Caldar earg aga wa u 200 he NT A wa datd

arc 8 200

xit No 2 a Deparet fiig o e 2

xib No i te Depate otio to re-o wit cop of docut

ataced oewa looel rewt

Exi No 4 te repodet eoradu o law fled o or aout Augt

10 2010 wit ab oted A hough .

Exiit No 5 th Dept otio to pretrit, fled Ocoer 18 2010 ad

coaig tab A troug C

Tee were all of te exibit ta wr oe e Cor a tie te Cour

gg by eae ce ta

order of Noveber 2010 te reaiig docuet av be fild o appeal ad i

read befor te igratio Cour

A077-0-01 Jue 21 201


7/12

Exhbi No 6 s h rsos r o aa fo h Boad w abs

od A hroug G acuarly ls ad als).

Exhb o. s h Board o Imigraio Aas oio o May 2012

xhib o. 8 s h sods rs bf o ma wih abs os A hrug

Exhbi No. 9 is rsos scod lg o b o rad.

Exhb No 10 s h so's xhibis o h BA mad o h Imgraio

Co wc cosis sa iigs o sa ocus a or o g a h

rcods bf igrao Cor).

AALYSS AN STATEMET OF THE LA

Bfor h Cour a uo ad by Boad his Cour s o gi rhr

rao gardig h Cou's grag o h oio o m Th Cou woud

o a i sil bis ha aco ag h moo o rmi is corc.

riwg is fil h C� ur os a h rso has ad sal aorys; o

cou wou fc our o ossbly i O s Auis Os [hoc s] h

Jif Ws h Sco Pasr h Say Sco ad h curr aory M. GR

Mamood rob ha ariss hs mar is h ars da of h

sos rus r adusm o saus.

Now docms ild by hcousl Ais Ors o S 9 2005

hr is - ad l m ma ha aor xb bcas I a goig o rfr o w

ak i xii No 1 ha s a Smbr 9 2005 a ab o cos ad

docs. Now h Cou was o o ha a of cos a w ha

a a o h a a a us a cks u

w ag 1 a h has ha a ohr ags aach o h rcord B ha as

ay Cour h ws h oio o rm ad og ha h l as b

A0-001 Ju 21 2013

. =


8/12

reconsucted and rthe noting that soe pages are ssng, bt aving give e

partis an opporunity to spemen whch has bee extedd to both sdes the fngs

ave ow been ade as compete as it would appear that tey cod be he issu in

ths mater s vey we ded Te acs dveloped ro te fgs o documns

before the Cou wold ndicae that o or abot Apri 24, the espoden had a diferet

counsel appy for a abo certiication whch wod eed to b fed, to be gradfard

der 245(i) by Apri 30 200 That applicatio was prepard and t appears was set

o te wrog state; i was set to exas wen shold hav be sent to Georga hat

docet eached exas apparety from the records i tis proceedig, arod Ap

27 Bt ay evet ere was a leter cong bac fro xas Depament of Labo

indicag that hat labo certiication eqest ad bee receied ad gve a date o

Apri 30 2001. at wl also be noted in te espodnt's firs brf i ecords ta he

fied on eand wh tabs noted A throgh K Exhbit No 8

ow in Augst of 2001 a eter was maled o the rspodet, to his the

cosel dcatig tat ts ae had bee led e wong state ad tat that

applicao had bee cancelled Sbseqet to is thee was appaety a proper

fiing made, owever, de o the fac at the exas Department o abo had caceled

e abor ceication eqest a ew prority date was give which was ater Api 30

2001 which meas that te respondet canot be grandatheed for pposes of

adustet wth the ules ad reguations then and hee existig Now th bie that

has been fed in Immgration Cout and also with he Board of migaton Appas,

woud indicae that a abor crication st be properly ed In Exhibit No 0 tab

we ave a ema o tra coe oce o e ea ocal rega i ao

cercatio n exas ad idcaes the cacellaon of ta appicao cacled e

xas prioiy date of Apri 30, 200 hee s also a ette ths l om e Txas

A77-44

LZ

5 Je 2 203


9/12

oiias datig at the matte was canelled and that would need to be reie

ha reilig was made an then ha aticua istace the aatio was deied

bease o the status o the resodent as he made his alicatio or adjusen o

stats Now he Cort ids at this matter was ot rery iled with the ore

eparmen o abor tha should hae been Georgia sead o exas. Frer a t s

ot prely ied ereore it has o be reiled and Texas as caneed that eaier

lg ate and it aears der the reglations that they hae the ower o do at and

they hae write leters that are in his recod o oeedng tha woul sbstaiate

hat ab B o Exib o 6 wl also ele hat Soe emasis is ge to he

espodes onsels arget ha e Texas abor oiials should hae set t to he

Georgia labo oials ad thereore ha it would be deemed iled whe reiosly iled

ad ior to or on Ai 302001 Howee the 20 CF ite gie by the esodets

ousel the bre aso indiaes tha e oal oie would be e one or the lg and

at was o Texas the loal oe would ae been Georgia. So these reglaios,

it wold aear that the resondent as lost is ory ate by lig he wrog state

e was epresented by ounsel and we do not kow why ounsel ied it i he wrng

state.

Be a as ay is cear at exas anelled that ilng It is lear tha e

resondent ateted to mae ilgs ae at a, bt e los his riority date

theeore e is ot gradathered r consideraton o aduse o stas unde INA

Seon 245(i) as is iigan sa etitio or aiation or abor ceration was o

proerly led and aroable whe led See 8 CR. 2510 Proely ie s deied

as h s o a a aaon o lao eato ha e aaon was

oey ed ad acceted ursat to te eglatios o the Seea o Labor, 20

C.F 656.21 " is mater the resondet aled o roerly ile hs alato or

A774- 6 une 21 2013

z ·


10/12

bor ceificon The mer ws eroneous ied wh he Tes Workrce

oission o Apr 27 21 ue o e bckog o cases hen peng was o

ce unil Augus 28 2 ise hen ws rejeced b e Tes Worforce

Commssion becuse ws ied e wrong locon See Ehibi 8 of he

Deprens lng o Ebi o. 5

heeoe e Cou finds a e esponde does o hve a properl fie

pplcion o laor ceriicaon pior o Ap 3 21 an hereore e cano be

consdere grndahered fr prposes of 25i) eligbi. Terefore he Cou

peeis hs ppco s i hs pevious noes nd now ses or he ehbs a

cosiue he recor n so e specic bs of hose ebis wch woul reflec

he me ws poper fled and ereoe e cnno be ganhere under

245() egulons.

As o von depure he or hs no knowege wheer he responen

s pose he vor epre s ws previousl oed a he prior Mser

enr hering. Th is mae h e oar cn ke up a s plesure The

our does no ve n records in is reco of poceedngs o efec wehe h ws

made o ade wih he poper fie-a ime pero

s e e s be eceriie nd sen bck o e ord o Imgron

Appes pusun o ei opinio o 7 22

Jne 21 213

Please see the nxt p ge for electroicsign ture

A7-4413 June 2 213


11/12

.-

A0770-01

WAYN K UE JRmigrtin Judg

8

I )

n 2 201


12/12

'

/s/

Iigration Jude WAYNE K. HOUSR, R.

hosew on epembe 3, 201 a :0 GMT

A-44 9 Jue 2 2

javed anwar, a077 044 013 (bia dec. 30, 2013)

Documents