Jeffco Citizens Leadership Academy

August-October 2013

Building Bright Futures Together

Schedule• August 27– Welcome, Overview of Jeffco, Budget

• September 3 and 10– Instruction

• September 17– Results and Schools

• September 24– Support Services, Business Services, Employee

Relations, Communications

• October 1– Board of Education and Graduation

Effectiveness

Colorado Academic Standards

New Generation

Data

READGraduati

onRequirements

PARCC

All means

All

TimeCompensation

Staffing

100% Bright Futures

Great Starts! Class of 2026!• Sustainabl

e Skills• Ethical

Human Beings

• Essential Qualities

• Passions

Strong Finishes! Class of 2014!

Rigor / Releva

nce

Relation-

ships

Climate

WHAT DOES MYVH MEASURE?

OVERALL POSITIVE RESPONSES FROM STUDENTS

All means on constructs and items are

above 2.5 (considered the mid-point on the

scale).1

2

3

4

Agre

eD

isagre

e

Best Practices

Professional Excellence

Road Map

Reading Writing Math Science+10

0

-10

Gr. 5

Gr. 10

Gr. 4,6,8Gr. 3,5

Gr. 9

Gr. 10

Gr. 8Gr. 4,6,7

Gr. 9Gr. 3,4,8,10

Gr. 5,6,

Gr. 7

Overall TCAP Ups and Downs for all Students Three Year Trend (2010 to 2013)

Gr. 10

+5

-5

Gr. 7,9

Gr. 5Gr. 3

Gr. 10

* Not a matched cohort across years.

Reading Writing Math Science+10

0

-10

Gr. 5

Gr. 10

Gr. 3,5

Gr. 10

Gr. 9

Gr. 6,8

Gr. 9Gr. 4

Gr. 7,8

Gr. 3

Overall TCAP Ups and Downs for Free and Reduced Lunch Students

Three Year Trend (2010 to 2013)

Gr. 10

+5

-5

Gr. 5Gr. 5,6

Gr. 8

Gr. 7

Gr. 4

Gr. 6,8,9,10

Gr. 7

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

*Not a matched cohort across years.

Reading Writing Math Science+10

0

-10

Gr. 5

Gr. 10

Gr. 5,6

Gr. 9

Gr. 3,8

Gr. 6

Gr. 5

Gr. 4,9

Overall Up’s and Downs for Hispanic Students Three Year Trend (2010 to 2013)

Gr. 10

+5

-5

Gr. 8

Gr. 9

Gr. 8

Gr. 7

Gr. 3,5,6

Gr. 10

Gr. 7

Gr. 7,8

Gr. 4,10

Gr. 4

Gr. 3

*Not a matched cohort across years.

Content

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Reading 51 51 53 50 51Math 55 53 55 55 55Writing 48 49 50 49 50

Jeffco Median Growth Percentile Reading Trends

Reading 2010 2011 2012 2013

All grades 51 53 50 51

Elementary 55 57 54 55

Middle 47 49 48 48

High 49 53 46 47

Grade 2010 2011 2012 2013

4 54 54 51 52

5 49 52 49 52

6 60 63 60 60

7 45 48 47 47

8 48 48 50 49

9 50 52 46 45

10 48 54 46 50

Green denotes growth that meets or exceeds state typical growth of 50

Jeffco Median Growth Percentile Writing Trends

Grade 2010 2011 2012 2013

4 50 55 50 53

5 45 48 46 47

6 57 60 58 59

7 45 44 45 47

8 46 46 48 47

9 49 48 48 47

10 51 50 50 49

Writing 2010 2011 2012 2013

All grades 49 50 49 50

Elementary 51 55 52 53

Middle 46 45 47 48

High 50 49 49 48

Green denotes growth that meets or exceeds state typical growth of 50

Jeffco Median Growth Percentile Math Trends

Math 2010 2011 2012 2013

All grades

53 55 55 55

Elementary 56 55 55 56

Middle 52 54 54 54

High 52 57 55 55

Grade 2010 2011 2012 2013

4 49 50 50 54

5 56 52 54 52

6 61 62 61 62

7 52 56 58 55

8 53 52 50 51

9 53 57 55 54

10 51 57 55 57

Green denotes growth that meets or exceeds state typical growth of 50

District Performance Framework

ACT: Jeffco

•J21.0 21.0 21.2 21.2

20.0 19.9 20.0 20.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2010 2011 2012 2013

Jeffco

Colorado

Elementary GrowthDistrict Reading Writing MathJeffco 55 53 56Cherry Creek 56 54 56

Adams 12 51 51 51

Douglas County 54 55 52

Littleton 53 56 50

Boulder 60 58 57

Denver 53 53 55

Aurora 46 46 52

Middle Level Growth

District Reading Writing MathJeffco 48 48 54Cherry Creek 51 54 53

Adams 12 56 43 43

Douglas County 48 47 47

Littleton 50 54 55

Boulder 54 55 51

Denver 52 56 56

Aurora 53 52 47

Senior High GrowthDistrict Reading Writing MathJeffco 47 48 55Cherry Creek 53 55 56

Adams 12 49 49 44

Douglas County 53 53 48

Littleton 49 51 52

Boulder 44 47 56

Denver 58 54 52

Aurora 56 50 52

2013 10th Grade TCAP Math District Comparisons

District2012 Percent Advanced &

Proficient

2013 Percent Advanced &

Proficient

Percentage Point Change

from 2012

Poverty Rate(2013)

Douglas 43% 45% 2 11Boulder 51% 50% -1 19Littleton 51% 49% -2 21Cherry Creek 41% 42% 1 25St. Vrain 36% 41% 5 33Brighton 18% 22% 4 34

Jeffco 42% 43% 1 34Adams 12 29% 30% 1 37Colorado 33% 34% 1 42Aurora 18% 20% 2 68Mapleton 16% 14% -2 71Denver 21% 25% 4 71Westminster 7% 7% 0 81Adams 14 8% 9% 1 82

Source: Colorado Department of Education

Remediation Rate Comparisons

District Remediation Rate

Poverty Rate(2013)

Douglas 25.6% 11Boulder 23.1% 19Littleton 25.9% 21Cherry Creek 33.4% 25St. Vrain 34.9% 33Brighton 54.1% 34

Jeffco 29.8% 34Adams 12 45% 37Colorado 39.2% 42Aurora 53.3% 68Mapleton 64.5% 71Denver 60.4% 71Westminster 59.1% 81Adams 14 81.3% 82

Jeffco’s Mission…..

To provide a quality education that prepares ALL children for a successful future…..