jet probes at rhic
DESCRIPTION
Jet Probes at RHIC. Justin Frantz Stony Brook University FRIF Workshop on QCD Power Corrections January 13, 2006. The Heavy Ion/QGP Mission. …in the context of this workshop… See q ’s/ g ’s outside of pQCD (Often delicate) NP effects in pQCD jet event shape… - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
1
Jet Probes at RHIC
Justin FrantzStony Brook University
FRIF Workshop on QCD Power CorrectionsJanuary 13, 2006
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
2
The Heavy Ion/QGP Mission• …in the context of this workshop…• See q’s/g’s outside of pQCD• (Often delicate) NP effects in
pQCD jet event shape… • Lattice QCD predicts
deconfinement phase change → a Quark Gluon Plasma
• Specifically, observe collective behavior of many q/g‘s in this plasma?
• “Larger Scale” observables– Temperature, Pressure, Density…
• Also how does it modify particle physics?– Chiral symmetry restoration?– Color screening melts J/Psi? – S modified @ finite Temp.
pion gas
Energy Density / T4
Lattice Calculation
T/TC
TC estimates ~ 170 MeV
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
3
RHIC• The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider: QGP Search
• Collides AuAu, pp, dAu, CuCu, … at energies √s = , 20, 62, 130, 200, 400, 500 GeV
• Polarized proton beams, Spin program → probe gluon spin structure
NYCRHIC
STAR
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
4
Highlights of Basic Results• Runs 1/yr 2001-2006… interesting yield of results: • Requisite Densities • Thermalization: success of statistical models w/ T
in the critical range• Hydrodynamic Flow: Too large for ideal QGP but
evidence against hadron gas– Baryon/Meson flow vs pT follows (common!) quark
number scaling instead of mass scaling– Hydro-models with only hadrons fail to reproduce– Hadron cross sections (esp. strange) too small to
build it up • Large Baryon Excess at soft-hard transition
energies (p/ ≈ 1)– Recombination of quarks promising way to explain
• “Strongly interacting QGP” (sQGP)– perfect liquid
Jargon:
CentralPeripheral
Npart participating nucleons
(%)
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
5
Hard Scattering Probes
• Hard scattering in Au+Au → pQCD (works well in p+p)• Insert into HI medium, observe differences• E.g. high pT hadron and direct photon production• High pT spectral shapes clearly power law as expected
for all centralities • And same shape— & ~ same as p+p
Au+Au → direct + X Au+Au → + X p+p → + X
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
6
RAA
• = Ratio of A+A/ scaled p+p• Scaling factor: number of equiv
N+N crossings (Ncoll)• FLAT• Prediction: jet energy loss leads
to suppression effect for fragmentation products
• But not for EM direct photons• Energy loss models depend on
dN/dygluons
– Many models: LPM effect, Modified D(z)
• → Density!• E ~ E was surprise (just E
shift - like NP?)
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
7
Elliptic Flow (v2)Transverse Plane
dN/d
pT 3-4 GeV/c
PHENIX
Incl. Hadrons
• In semi-central events initial state spacial anisotropy → momentum space
• v2 – second Fourier harmonic w/ w.r.t the (measured) global reaction plane
• 2 Kinds:– At low pT (soft), hydrodynamic (of
quarks we believe)– At high pT, energy loss of jet partons
traversing the matter
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
8
Di-Jet Di-Hadron Correlations
Nearside Awayside
P(A,B)P(A)P(B)=
STAR
PHENIX
200 GeV pT
trig 5-10, pT
assoc 1-2 GeV/c
p+pAu+Au
6
5
4
3
2
1
• Huge Soft background (dN/d ~ 1000) • Jet Finding difficult (Impossible?) in HI environment• Rely on 2-particle opening angle (azimuthal)
correlations
• 2 categories in pT: “Trigger” (high pT) & “Assoc”
h-h
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
9
Experimental Method: Flow Subtraction
• Assume 2-source correlation Flow + Jet
• Main source of systematic error• b0 determined by “Zero Yield At Minimum” (ZYAM),
other methods
Note scale
PHENIX 0–h pTtrig 5-10 GeV/c pT
assoc 3-5 GeV/c
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
10
First Results (High x Low pT)
• Jet suppression of awayside shape
• Nearside per trigger yield same
• Absolute NS yield suppressed
• At low pT, “recovered”
w/ pT,assoc 0.2 GeV/c
4-6 x 2-4 GeV/c
0
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
11
High x High “Re-emergence”
• Low/No Background (Flow Sub. Unimportant)
• Clear emergence of jet structure at the away-side
• Away side width consistent with constant
• Away side yield suppressed
8 < pT(trig) < 15 GeV/cpT(assoc)>6 GeV/c
STAR Preliminary
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
12
Really Weird! Low x Low
• Large modication on the awayside!
• Cone/ Volcano shape• Medium response to the
jets?• Explained by:
– Mach cone sound wave– Color cerenkov cone– Bending jets
• If Mach Cone, size → vsound → direct measure of matter property
0
STAR
PHENIX
2.5-4 GeV/c trig
1-2.5 GeV/c assoc
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
13
How Robust is The Volcano?
In plane
• Still questions about robustness (oversubtraction in v2?)
• Look @ trigger w.r.t. RP• Over subtraction→ opposite
effect
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
14
IAA etc.
• Looking for best way to analyze extracted jet (-integrated) yields
• Good parameter – pT, zT,xE ? • IAA : ratio of integrated per-trigger yield in
A+A/p+p• How does it fit together with RAA? Better
quantity? Still open
STAR Awayside
IAA (≈ RAA !)
An Eloss model: Wang et. al.Phys. Lett. B579 (2004) 299–308.
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
15
Direct -Jet
• In central Au+Au high suppression effect → higher purity of direct
• Complement of jet-jet Eloss
• Probes interior of collision volume
• E proxy for Ejet • Extraction of direct-jet from
inclusive correlations underway
S/B
Measured Direct Signal/Bkg(Decay bkg)
Central Au+Au 200 GeV
__ pQCD w/ had. suppression
≈p+p 200 GeV
dir-jetjet-jet
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
16
Jet Event Shapes @ RHIC• Good things @ RHIC
– Not just A+A: p+p, p+A, polarized p+p (& lots!)– Dectectors optimized for soft physics (Good E,p resolution/ PID above 50
MeV…) in addition to hard• Bad things
– As h+h, central rapidity restriction– Ambiguity of Q/√s12 – In Au+Au…well… e.g. no jet finding (jets modified!)…etc…
• From your standpoint– For p+p, best source of low Q? (mid- x ranges like Tevatron/LHC, but
lower s) – Au+Au Interesting modification to hadronization – could Power Correction
frameworks say anything sensible? How about in d+Au ?• From HI experimentalist standpoint
– Want to use jets to probe medium: event shapes are a natural goal
What am I doing @ this workshop?
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
17
Energy Energy Correlations
• Instead of muliplicity correlations, energy flow, correlations (“combining” info in all pT bins)
• No jet finding neccesary• auto-convolution of JCEF →other shape observable as
correlations?• Sensitive to S , NP effects (plasma?)
–
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
18
EEC in h+h?
• EEC never measured in h+h?• Structure Fn complication x1x2 distribution of Q• But theory work says it should be possible
– Basham, Et al: Use Tranverse EEC()– Gale et. al. QGP multiple scatt. → large effects to
TEEC (hep-ph/9406208)• Measured and used in DIS
@ HERA (1 S.F.)
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
19
EEC in A+A
• 2 EEC’s in A+A? sQGP has its own? (beyond flow?…)
• Large flow harmonic contribution
• Extract Jet EEC– Large underlying ET
(shape distorting) – Combinatoric pair subtraction– PHENIX ½ solid ang. → missed ET even p+p
Lokhtin et al., hep-ph/0402108
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
20
Effect of Inaccurate ET
• Pythia study of EEC (200 GeV p+p)
ET (GeV)
Q (GeV)Q (GeV)
In PHENIX
EE
C(
)
A.U
. Ratio to Blue (Arbitrary Norm)
EEC w/ ET in Denom
EEC w/ true Q in Denom
EEC w/ real Phx Acc
EEC w/ Phenix ET Denom
Q = 10-15 GeV/c
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
21
Idea: EEC Direct-Gamma Events
• Similar to the DIS t-channel
• Does it probe the same properties? (g/q jet)
• Ever done before?• Two varieties
– only charged particles-E only – Including neutral (w/ direct )– Is one better?
PYTHIA direct events E 10-15 GeV
2E TRIG
(GeV)
Q (GeV)
EEC() A.U.
PYTHIA direct events
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
22
Conclusions
• Interesting time at RHIC• Jet/Hard observables continue to provide key
information• We see jet modification!• Can we use “traditional” event shape?• …& same perturbative inspired frameworks? • Need help from theorists
– What can be calculated?– What can be learned?
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
23
Flat RAA? (Energy Loss)
• Example of using hard scattering probes
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
24
Understanding RAA(Npart, )– Can we find a consistent description of centrality and dependence of RAA?
– Define with
– Perform survival-weighted average over all production points, emission directions.
– Survival weighting:
ldlLeff )( 0
0)(
21 neffsurv Lkp
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
25
1/13/06 Frif Power Corr. Wkshop – Justin Frantz
26
Energy Loss Calculations