jim thorne fhwa - resource center. the sustainable communities partnership and livability principles...

58
Livability and Sustainability Arkansas Transportation Planning Conference May 18, 2011 Jim Thorne FHWA - Resource Center

Upload: margarita-detherage

Post on 11-Dec-2015

239 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Livability and Sustainability

Arkansas Transportation Planning ConferenceMay 18, 2011 Jim Thorne

FHWA - Resource Center

Agenda

• The Sustainable Communities Partnership and Livability Principles

• Livability and the Planning Process

• Livability Examples and Resources

• Sustainability

Places that balance their economic and natural assets so that the diverse needs of local residents can be met now and in the future.

Typically, these communities have lower costs for consumers and more value for taxpayers because they are more connected and efficient.

Accelerate job growth for this and future generations, with:◦ expanded housing and transportation choices, ◦ greater energy independence, and ◦ better protection for our clean air and water.

Sustainable Communities

DOT, EPA, HUD Improve access to affordable housing, provide

more transportation options and lower transportation costs while protecting the environment

Encourages livability principles to be incorporated into federal programs and funding.

Achieve our economic, social, and environmental goals most effectively when we work on them together.

Sustainable Communities Partnership

DOT/HUD/EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities

Six Livability Principles of the Sustainability Partnership

Provide More Transportation

Choices

Coordinate Policies and Leverage Investment

Promote Equitable, Affordable Housing

Enhance Economic Competitiveness

Support Existing Communities

Value Communities and Neighborhoods

Targeting resources through grants and other programs to help states and communities create jobs and stronger economies by developing more sustainably.

Removing regulatory and policy barriers at the federal level to make it easier for state and local governments to access federal services and resources.

Aligning agency priorities and embedding the Livability Principles in each agency’s actions so that transportation, housing, and environmental protection efforts are coordinated.

Partnership Goals:

Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grants

Joint DOT TIGER II-HUD Community Challenge Grants HUD Sustainable Communities Regional Planning

Grants Funds for Urban Circulator and Bus & Bus Livability

Projects State Revolving Funds for Water Infrastructure Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Greening America’s Capitals HUD Adoption of Sustainability Criteria in Scoring

Grant Applications

TARGETING RESOURCES TO COMMUNITIES

Executive Order on Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance

Brownfields Policy Change Brownfields Pilot Communities Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Pilot Initiative

Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations

Reducing Contracting Conflicts Change to Federal Transit Administration’s New

Starts Program

REMOVING FEDERAL BARRIERS

Coordinating Policies and Funding Programs

HUD Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities

EPA Office of Sustainable Communities

Regional Partnerships

ALIGNING POLICIES AND BUDGETS

Broaden Partnership

Continue examining and, if necessary, modifying federal policies and actions on transportation, housing, and environmental protection to complement each other and to better reflect the Livability Principles.

Next?

Livability in Transportation

Using the quality, location and type of transportation facilities and services to help achieve broader community goals such as access to good jobs, affordable housing, quality schools, and safe streets

Livability, sustainability, smart growth, walkable communities, new urbanism, healthy neighborhoods, active living, transit oriented development, complete streets, . . .

Livable CommunitiesMore efficient use of resources

Increase accessibility

Improve connections and options

Reduce energy use

Environmental benefits

Health and Social benefitsLivable Communities are where people have access to many different forms of transportation and affordable housing…..” U.S. DOT Secretary, Ray LaHood

Transportation Planning Factors

Support economic vitality Increase safety Increase security Increase accessibility and mobility Protect and enhance the environment Enhance connectivity across and between

modes Promote efficient system management and

operation Preserve the existing transportation

system.

(E) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

Transportation Planning Factors

Goals, performance measures, policies related to livability, quality of life, . . .

Help region develop vision related to community growth and development.

Reach beyond usual groups to housing, public health, water resources, . . .

Land use and transportation integration. Multi-modal planning. Interdisciplinary efforts. CSS in regional, corridor, project planning. Options and approaches vary.

Livability in the Planning Process

Opportunities to Address Livability

Planning for:◦Grid street patterns, short

blocks, streetscapes◦Transit and transit supportive

land use◦Planning for bike and

pedestrian travel◦Land use (as it supports

transportation and vice versa)

◦System efficiencies◦Travel Demand Management

Opportunities to Address Climate Change

Connected streets Complete streets Pedestrian facilities Bicycle planning Scenario planning Land Use/Transportation integration Safe Routes to School Transit supportive land use Multi-modal planning Context Sensitive Solutions Management and Operations

Issues that may come into play when talking about livability in transportation planning:

Safety Accessibility Integrated planning Public Engagement Freight Corridor planning GHG emission reduction Public health ?

More issues that may come into play when talking about livability in transportation planning:

Goal Driven Community engagement and outreach Place Based Context Sensitive Recognizes existing values and assets Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Explores inter-relationships of key elements Collaborative

Livability aligns with good planning practices

Atlanta, GA—Livable Centers Initiative (LCI)◦ LCI program initiated in 1999 to better link transportation and

land use planning with long-term goals of VMT and congestion reduction and improved air quality.

◦ Awards grants to prepare plans to enhance existing centers and corridors.

◦ More than 100 studies had been completed, representing nearly $9 million in planning assistance funding.

One Illustration of Livability -

Chattanooga, TNRiverfront Parkway Transportation and Urban

Design Plan

Converted the Riverfront Parkway from a four-lane, limited-access expressway to an urban surface street.

Three primary objectives guided the design: ◦ Better vehicular and pedestrian connections to downtown,◦ Improving riverfront area◦ Capacity that better matched expected traffic volumes.

The project has improved access, commuting patterns, and renewed economic viability for the eastern portion of downtown.

Chattanooga, TN Riverfront Parkway Transportation and Urban

Design Plan

Maine Gateway 1 Corridor

Identify issues in corridor and reach agreement on roles and responsibilities of Partners.

21 Communities involved in corridor plan

Develop Corridor Plan.Three Scenarios: Full Wind, Riding the Current, Perfect Storm

Implement and monitor Plan.Move people and goods safety and smoothlyPreserve scenic, rural qualities along the corridorExpand ability to grow jobs in the corridor

AASHTO and Livability

Every transportation project is an opportunity to improve the quality of life in a community.

1) Support the rural landscape

2) Help existing places thrive

3) Create great new places

Rural Communities

icma.org

Update strategic and policy documents to accommodate new growth through compact and contiguous development

Visioning Places worth preserving Designated growth areas

Infrastructure grid and transportation options Distinctive local character

Reform policies to make it easy for developers to build compact, walkable, mixed-use places

Policy alignment Walkability Parks and open space

Form Based Codes Traditional neighborhood development

Context-sensitive design Green street design Low Impact Development

Recognize and reward developers that build great places using smart growth and green building approaches

Smart growth recognition programs Green building

Create Great New Places

ICMA: Putting Smart Growth to Work

NCHRP 582Best Practices to Enhance the Transportation - Land Use Connection in the Rural United States

www.trb.org

Strategies to Improve Access and LivabilitySet Regional Framework- for where and how develop Growth management, preservation Regional access management promote

designated areas

Improve Local Accessibility – jobs, shopping, services, healthcare

Development standards and plans –mixed use Transportation investments – street

connectivity, ped and bike, transit service to focal points

Enhance Community Design – CSS complement natural and built

environment Local access management and design –

commercial areas

NCHRP 582

Factors for Success

Collaborative partnershipsFocusing on quality of life and sustainability

Public involvement and educationStrong local leadership

NCHRP 582

“Smart Transportation is a collaborative approach to supporting great communities for future generations of Pennsylvanians.”

PennDOT’s Smart Transportation Guidebook

www.smart-transportation.com

Land Use Contexts

Traditionally – it’s been either urban or ruralLand use context – land area comprising unique combination of land uses, density, building formCommon place types found in every PennDOT district

RURAL

SUBURBAN CORRIDOR

TOWN / VILLAGE CENTER

TOWN / VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD

URBAN CORE

SUBURBAN CENTER

SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD

The “Linkage”

ProgramCapital District Transportation

Committee – Albany, NY MPO

www.cdtcmpo.org/linkage.htm

CDTC Linkages

Context Sensitive Solutions

Collaborative Interdisciplinary Involves all stakeholders

Results in facility that complements;Physical setting, and Preserves scenic, aesthetic, and historic

and environmental resources, whileMaintaining safety and mobility

www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/csd.htm

Elements of Effective CSS

Purpose and NeedStakeholder involvement Interdisciplinary TeamCommunity values and qualitiesObjective Evaluation of full range of

alternatives

http://www.contextsensitivesolutions.org/

• Bike Lanes

• Recreational multi-use trails

• Pedestrian refuge islands, sidewalks, countdown signals

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements

Livability Web Sitewww.fhwa.dot.gov/livability

planning.dot.gov

Executive Summary

Introduction

Project Highlights

Visioning

Planning and Process

Policy

Partnership

Design

Implementation and Funding

Conclusion

• Illustrates how livability principles have been incorporated into transportation

• Explores how transportation planning and programs can improve community quality of life, enhance the environment and improve transportation and housing choice

• Encourages transportation practitioners to think more broadly about project goals

• Enlist more partners and develop more integrated solutions to support community livability

Livability Guidebook

Livability Guidebook

Series of urban and rural case studies and strategies that facilitate:

• Revitalizing rural small towns• Better connecting downtowns with neighborhoods• Completing street networks• Supporting compact, mixed use development• Maximize efficiency of existing transportation

infrastructure• Mitigate impacts of climate change• Preserve natural and cultural resources

Scenario PlanningHow will the residents live? • In what types of communities do we want to live and

work 50 years from now? Where will the jobs be and how do we get there?

Where will residents live? • What areas in the region are suitable for urban and

village-scaled development, and what areas are off-limits?

How will the community get there? • What steps are needed to move the region from where it

is now to the desired types of communities and growth patterns?

Implementation: State and Regional Strategies

FHW

A S

cenari

o P

lannin

gw

ww

.fh

wa.d

ot.

gov/p

lan

nin

g/s

cen

pla

n/

Implementation: State and Regional Strategies

Linking cities and suburban corridors, growing rural counties, and small towns with a complete street network and targeted transit improvements

Re-engineering existing roadways to improve vehicle capacity; pedestrian, bike, and transit service

Identifying operational and access management improvements

FHW

A L

and U

se T

ool K

itw

ww

.fh

wa.d

ot.

gov/p

lan

nin

g/l

an

du

se/

Livability Guidebook Livability Implementation Research Paper 5 Regional workshops with key stakeholders to

identify opportunities and obstacles.◦ Locations—Sacramento, CA; Denver, CO; Kansas

City, MO; Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA National Association of Development

Organizations Peer Exchanges that focused on Rural Livability.◦ GA, NC and CA Divisions participated

Livability Performance Measures

Current FHWA’s Efforts to Advance Livability

SustainabilitySustainability - A set of environmental, economic and social conditions in which all of society has the capacity and opportunity to maintain and improve its quality of life indefinitely without degrading the quantity, quality or the availability of natural, economic and social resources (from American Society of Civil Engineers)

Sustainable development - Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (from World Commission on Environment and Development)

Sustainable transportation - Transportation that promotes sustainable development.

Source: Transportation Planning and Sustainability GuidebookFHWA, 2011

Sustainability: The Triple Bottom Line

Livability and Sustainability• Livability and sustainability promote environmentally sustainable travel

options, consideration of human health issues, and economic development.

• Sustainability includes long term, multi-generational focus.

• Livability initiatives as a subset of sustainability; focused more on near term planning, funding and implementation at the community level.

• Sustainability addresses larger environmental goals such as improving air and water quality, reducing climate impacts, increasing energy efficiency, and decreasing dependence on foreign oil.

• Livability may be less specific about larger environmental goals.

• Transportation solutions that support both are likely similar.

About Sustainability - FHWA encourages sustainable highway

practices throughout the project lifecycle:◦ Planning ◦ Project Development◦ Operations and Management

FHWA is developing a Sustainable Highways Tool in order to:◦ Help agencies measure sustainability and

quantify tradeoffs◦ Provide a framework for communicating with

stakeholders about sustainability◦ Establish a method for evaluating sustainable

highways

Transportation Planning for Sustainability Guidebook

Examines how sustainability considerations could be better incorporated into transportation planning through case studies identified from a review of sustainability planning practices at State DOTs and from a literature review of U.S. and international practices.

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/climate/sustainability/index.cfm

Sustainable Highways Tool

◦ Self-evaluation tool to measure sustainability over the life cycle of a transportation project

◦ Collection of best practices◦ Web-based◦ Based on triple bottom line

Environmental Economic Social

◦ Pilot Test Version

www.sustainablehighways.org

Project Development CriteriaPD-1 Cost Benefit Analysis

PD-2 Highway and Traffic Safety

PD-3 Context Sensitive Project

Development (or equivalent)

PD-4 Lifecycle Cost Analysis

PD-5 Freight Mobility

PD-6 Educational Outreach

PD-7 Tracking Environmental

Commitments

PD-8 Habitat Restoration

PD-9 Stormwater

PD-10 Ecological Connectivity

PD-11 Recycle & Reuse Materials

PD-12 Create Renewable Energy

PD-13 Site Vegetation

PD-14 Pedestrian Access

PD-15 Bicycle Access

PD-16 Transit & HOV Access

Project Development CriteriaPD-17 Historical,

Archaeological, and Cultural Preservation

PD-18 Scenic, Natural, or Recreational Qualities

PD-19 Low-Emitting Materials

PD-20 Energy Efficient Lighting

PD-21 ITS for System Operations

PD-22 Long-Life Pavement Design

PD-23 Reduced Energy and Emissions in

Pavement Materials

PD-24 Contractor Warranty

PD-25 Earthwork Balance

PD-26 Construction Environmental Training

PD-27 Construction Equipment Emission Reduction

PD-28 Construction Noise Mitigation

PD-29 Construction Quality Plan

PD-30 Construction Waste Management

Next Steps Revise additional criteria

◦ Revise System Planning criteria – July 31◦ Revise O&M criteria – September 1

Pilot Testing◦ Develop Panel to Assist in Pilot testing - May◦ Call for Pilot Projects (PD criteria)– June 1◦ Call for Pilots: (Planning, O&M) – Sept-Oct

Weighting & Scoring Review - ongoing Updates to Website - ongoing Version 1.0 Release – December 31, 2011

Livability in Arkansas

• Where do we have examples of livability in the transportation planning process?

• What do you think are reasonable things to do to address livability as part of the planning process?

• What do you need to move forward with livability initiatives?

Livability Planning Strategies• Broaden Community Engagement• Livability Goals and Performance Measures• Integrate Land Use and Transportation Planning• Pursue Connected Street Networks• Improve Access Management Programs• Support Projects that Reconnect Communities • Develop Multimodal Projects• Advance Travel Demand Management and

Operational Strategies• Consider Freight Movement and Needs• Use CSS Approach: Planning, Project

Development• Address Transportation Safety • Conduct Multimodal Corridor Planning

“Trend Is Not Destiny”Lewis Mumford