jmolstruct song 83-88 no 2004

Upload: dwiameliasavitri

Post on 10-Mar-2016

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

mol

TRANSCRIPT

  • on

    2-

    erab

    Lan

    en Un

    ca An

    ze 17/A, 43100 Parma, Italy

    accepted 20 September 2004

    ne 28

    O)2]$ligan

    in the triclinic space group PK1, are isostructural, and their solid structures are stabilized by hydrogen bonding and pp interactionsbetween aminopyrimidine rings. The compounds exhibit solvatochromism as evidenced by a UV/Vis study in different solvents.

    chromotropic and exhibit color change when exposed to

    Journal of Molecular Structu0022-2860/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.q 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Copper; Solvatochromism; 2-Aminopyrimidine; Thiocyanate

    1. Introduction

    Structure and magnetic studies of metal complexes with

    2-aminopyrimidine (abbreviated as ampym) are of con-

    siderable interest due to the coordination diversity exhibited

    by the ligand and metal ions [1,2]. With Cu(II), quite a large

    number of different compounds have been reported and the

    structures often depend on the nature of the anion and the

    synthetic method [2,3]. With Ni(II) and Co(II) and ampym

    as a ligand only a few complexes have been determined by

    X-ray diffraction methods [4,5].

    The investigation of the solvatochromic behavior [6] of

    mixed-ligand metal complexes has been of importance,

    because it provides a quantitative approach to recognize the

    solvent behavior and the role of the solvent in physico-

    chemical studies [7]; moreover, it is very helpful for

    developing environmental sensor materials, which are

    In the present paper, the synthesis and characterization of

    two mononuclear isostructural thiocyanato compounds with

    the general formula [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O(MZNi(II), Co(II)) will be reported. In addition, thesolvatochromism of both compounds has been investigated

    by UV/vis in different solvents.

    2. Experimental section

    2.1. General remarks and physical measurements

    All starting reagents and solvents were purchased from

    commercial sources and used as received. C, H, N analyses

    were performed on a PerkinElmer 2400 series II analyzer.

    Infrared spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Paragon

    1000 spectrophotometer equipped with a Golden Gate ATRSynthesis, structural characterisati

    and a Co(II) compound with

    Yufei Songa, Chiara MassAnna Maria Manotti

    aGorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, LeidbDipartimento di Chimica Generale ed Inorganica, Chimi

    Parco Area delle Scien

    Received 7 July 2004;

    Available onli

    Abstract

    Two mononuclear complexes of formula [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction methods, IR andOctober 2004

    2H2O (MZNi(II), Co(II); ampymZ2-aminopyrimidine) have beend-field spectra. The Ni(II) and Co(II) compounds, which crystallizeiversity, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.

    alitica, Chimica Fisica, Universitadegli Studi di Parma,and solvatochromism of a Ni(II)

    aminopyrimidine as a ligand

    , Gerard A. van Albadaa,fredib, Jan Reedijka,*

    re 734 (2005) 8388

    www.elsevier.com/locate/molstrucrange with a Cary 50 Varian UV/vis/NIR spectrometer.

    Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS, Positive ion)

    in MeOH solutions were recorded on a Thermo Finnigan

    doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.09.007

    * Corresponding author. Tel.: C31 71 5274450; fax: C31 71 5274671.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Reedijk).solvent or pollutant molecules [8].device, using the diffuse reflectance technique. The UV/vis

    spectrum of the compound was recorded in the 250800 nm

  • AQA apparatus. The ligand-field spectra of the solid

    samples were recorded in the 2002000 nm range on a

    PerkinElmer Lambda 900 UV/Vis/NIR spectrometer in the

    diffuse reflectance mode with MgO as a reference. The

    conductivity measurement was performed with a Philips

    PW 9526 digital conductivity meter and PW 9551/60

    measuring cell with a 1 mM solution of the complexes in

    MeOH, H2O and MeCN.

    2.2. General synthesis of the complexes

    Ni(NO3)2$6H2O (10 mmol, 2.9 g) dissolved in water(10 mL) was added to a solution of NH4SCN (20 mmol,

    1.5 g) in water (30 mL), and the 2-aminopyrimidine

    (20 mmol, 1.9 g) in 20 mL of methanol was added to the

    well stirred aqueous solution. The resulting solution was

    filtered and left to evaporate at room temperature. Blue

    crystals were collected after 1 week. Yield 62%. For the

    Ni(II) Compound (1): ESI-MS: m/zZ438.2; Elementalanalysis [found(calc.)] for C10H18NiN8O4S2: C 27.5 (27.4);

    H 4.3 (4.1); N 25.7 (25.6); S 14.5 (14.6). IR (cmK1):

    3460.3 (w), 3330.4 (m), 2084.7 (s), 1629.0 (s), 1569.7 (s),

    1489.4 (s), 1360.0 (s), 1195.8 (s), 787.0 (s), 660.2 (s),

    523.7 (s). (w, m and s represent the intensity of the

    absorption peaks as weak, medium and strong,

    respectively).

    The Co(II) compound (2) was synthesized in the similar

    way, and blue crystals were collected after about 1 week.

    Yield 60%. ESI-MS: m/zZ438.4. Elemental analysis[found(calc.)] for C10H18CoN8O4S2: C 27.5 (27.4); H 4.2

    (4.1); N 25.7 (25.6); S 14.5 (14.6). IR (cmK1): 3462.0 (w),

    3332.0 (m), 2075.7 (s), 1627.9 (s), 1569.9 (s), 1486.0 (s),

    1358.8 (m), 787.4 (m), 659.7 (m), 522.0 (m).

    2.3. X-ray crystallographic study

    The molecular structure of both [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O (MZNi(II) and Co(II)) was determined bysingle-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. Crystallographic

    and experimental details for the two structures are summar-

    ized in Table 1. Intensity data and cell parameters were

    recorded at room temperature (25 8C) on a Bruker AXSSmart 1000 single-crystal diffractometer (Mo Ka radiation)equipped with a CCD area detector. The data reduction was

    performed using the SAINT and SADABS programs [9].

    The structure was solved by Direct Methods using the

    SIR97 program [10] and refined on F02 by full-matrix least-

    squares procedures, using the SHELXL-97 program [11].

    All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic

    atomic displacements. The hydrogen atoms were located

    in the difference Fourier map with the exception of

    the hydrogen atoms of the water molecules of

    Table 1

    Crystallographic data for [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O (MZNi(II) and Co(II))

    H2O)

    ]

    10;K

    .0840

    .0890

    er of r

    Y. Song et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 734 (2005) 838884Compound [Ni(ampym)2(SCN)2(

    Empirical formula C10H18N8NiO4S2Formula weight 437.15

    Crystal system Triclinic

    Space group PK1 (no. 2)

    a (A) 7.259(5)

    b (A) 7.895(5)

    c (A) 9.065(5)

    a (8) 67.578(5)

    b (8) 72.511(5)

    g (8) 76.860(5)

    V (A3) 454.3(5)

    Z 1

    Dcalcd (g/cm3) 1.598

    m(mmK1) 1.331

    Crystal size (mm) 0.13!0.16!0.20

    F(000) 226

    T (K) 293(2)

    Radiation (A) 0.71069

    Reflections collected 5109

    Indipendent reflections 2050 [R(int)Z0.0340Observed reflections [IO2s(I)] 1467Data/restraints/parameters 2050/7/143

    q range for data collection (8) 2.528.0

    Index ranges K9%h%9; K9 %k%Goodness-of-fit on F2 a 0.921

    Final R indices (obs. data)b R1Z0.0384, wR2Z0R indices (all data)b R1Z0.0613, wR2Z0Largest diff. peak and hole (e/AK3) 0.422 and K0.423

    a Goodness-of-fit SZP

    WFo KFc2nKp1=2 , where n is the numb

    P P P P 1=2b R1 Z sFojKFcs jFoj; wR2 Z WFo KFc2 WFo .2]$2H2O [Co(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O

    C10H18CoN8O4S2437.37

    Triclinic

    PK1 (no. 2)

    9.145(3)

    7.943(3)

    7.328(3)

    103.311(5)

    107.381(5)

    67.378(5)

    464.9(3)

    1

    1.562

    1.180

    0.16!0.18!0.24

    225

    293(2)

    0.71069

    3884

    1926 [R(int)Z0.0169]1839

    1926/0/143

    2.527.6

    11%l%11 K11%h%11; K9%k%10; K9%l%91.08

    R1Z0.0288, wR2Z0.0864R1Z0.0301, wR2Z0.08760.500 and K0.345

    eflections and p the number of parameters.

  • Molecular geometry calculations were carried out using

    the PARST97 program [12]. Drawings were obtained by

    ORTEP3 in the WinGX suite [13]. All calculations were

    carried out on a DIGITAL Alpha Station 255 computer.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. Description of the structure

    [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H20 (MZNi(II) and Co(II))

    The Ni(II) and Co(II) compounds are isostructural with

    the metal ion lying on an inversion center; an ORTEP view

    of the Ni(II) compound is depicted in Fig. 1. Selected bond

    distances and angles for both complexes are reported in

    Table 2.

    A slightly distorted octahedral coordination is observed

    around both metal ions: four short in-plane bonds involve

    two trans oxygens from the water molecules [NiO1Z2.072(2) A,CoO1Z2.093(2) A] and two trans nitrogenatoms from the thiocyanate groups [NiN4Z2.058(3) A,CoN4Z2.107(2) A]. The axial positions are

    Y. Song et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 734 (2005) 8388 85Fig. 1. An ortep view (20% probability) of [Ni(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$crystallizations. The weighting scheme used in the last

    cycle of refinement was wZ1=s2F20 C0:0456P2 and wZ1=s2F20 C0:0582P2C0:1432P (where PZF20 C2F2c =3)for (1) and (2), respectively.

    2H2O with the used atomic numbering scheme.

    Table 2

    Selected bond lengths (A), angles (8) and hydrogen bonding parameters for [M(a

    [Ni(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O

    Bond lengths: Ni1O1 2.072(2); Ni1 N4 2.058(3); Ni1N1 2.147(2)

    Bond angles: O1Ni1N1 89.38(8); N4Ni1O1 91.71(10); N4Ni1N1 92.04(1

    Hydrogen bonds

    DH/A H/A(A)N3H1N/O1 2.23(4)N3H1N/N4 2.48(3)N3H2N/S1 (1Kx, Ky, 2Kz) 2.62(2)O1H2S/O1S 1.88(3)O1H1S/O1S (Kx, 1Ky, 1Kz) 1.90(3)C4H4/N4 (1Kx, 1Ky, 1Kz) 2.69(4)C4H4/O1 (1Kx, 1Ky, 1Kz) 2.66(3)[Co(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2OBond lengths: Co1O1 2.093(2); Co1N4 2.107(2); Co1N1 2.217(2)

    Bond angles: O1Co1N4 88.71(7); O1Co1N1 91.06(6); N4Co1N1 92.29(6

    Hydrogen bonds

    DH/A H/A(A) D/A (A) DH/A(8)N3H2N/O1 (2Kx, 1Ky, Kz) 2.29(4) 2.983(3) 134(4)N3H2N/N4 2.49(3)N3H1N/S1 (1Kx, 2Ky, Kz) 2.67(3)O1H2S/O1S (2Kx, 1Ky, 1Kz) 1.97(3)O1H1S/O1S 2.06(4)C4H4/N4 (2Kx, 1Ky, Kz) 2.78(4)C4H4/O1 2.78(3)3.123(3) 128(3)

    3.522(3) 170(3)

    2.768(2) 170(4)

    2.773(3) 167(3)

    3.135(3) 107(2)occupied by the N1 endocyclic nitrogen from two trans-

    oriented ampym ligands [NiN1Z2.147(2) A,CoN1Z2.217(2) A]. The S1C5N4 thiocyanate groups are nearly

    linear with angles of 178.0(3)8 and 177.9(2)8 for the Ni(II)and Co(II) compounds, respectively. The thiocyanate groups

    are not linear coordinated to the metal ions (angles MNC

    are 153 and 1548 for MZCo, and Ni, respectively), and theorigin from the deviation of 1808 appears to be related tothe hydrogen bonding in the lattice. The dihedral angles that

    the least-square plane through NIN2C1C2C3C4 forms

    mpym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O (MZNi(II) and Co(II))

    0); S1C5N4 178.0(3); Ni1-N4C5 153.7(2)

    D/A (A) DH/A(8)2.934(2) 134(2)

    3.073(4) 124(2)

    3.499(3) 164(1)

    2.768(3) 169(3)

    2.771(4) 164(2)

    3.077(5) 105(2)

    3.130(4) 111(2)

    ); N4C5S1 177.9(2); Co1N4C5 151.0(2)3.220(3) 107(2)

  • with the equatorial plane, with the N1MO1 and with

    N1MN4 moieties are 87.4(1), 43.8(1) and 47.9(1)8 in the

    Ni(II) compound and 87.0(1), 44.4(1) and 46.9(1)8 in the

    Co(II) complex.

    To the best of our knowledge, the only related Ni(II) or

    Co(II) complexes containing two ampym and two water

    molecules in an octahedral arrangement around the metal

    ion is the polymeric compound [Ni(SO4)(C4H5N3)2(H2O)2]$C6H5N3 [5]. In this complex, the sulfate ion actsas a bridging moiety between the metal atoms which

    present, in the equatorial plane, two mutually cis nitrogen

    atoms from ampym and two mutually cis oxygen atoms

    from the water molecules.

    The configuration of the present complexes, with the

    ampym ligands almost orthogonal to the equatorial plane

    and nearly bisecting the O1MN4 bond angles, is

    bonds, also the intramolecular bifurcated interactions

    CH/N(NCS) and CH/O(coordinated H2O) involvingthe ampym C4H4 group [C4/N4Z3.077(5) A, C4/O1Z3.130(4) A for the Ni(II) complex; C4/N4Z3.135(3) A, C4 /O1Z3.220(3) A for the Co(II)compound].

    3.2. Infrared spectroscopy

    The position of the bands of the thiocyanate group related

    to the stretching frequency of the CN moiety can be used to

    characterize the coordination mode of this ligand to the

    metal ions. The CN stretching of a bridging thiocyanate is

    usually found to be above 2100 cmK1 [14]. In the case of the

    nickel(II) complex, the stretching frequency of the thiocya-

    nate occurs at 2084 cmK1, which indicates normal end-on

    NCS coordination. The bands corresponding to the stretch-

    ing frequency of CS and NCS appear at 787 and 463 cmK1,

    which is in good agreement with an end-on NCS

    coordination. For the Co(II) complex, the typical stretching

    frequency for the thiocyanate group can be observed at

    2075 cmK1, while the band belonging to CS and the

    deformation frequency NCS occur at 787 and 459 cmK1,

    Y. Song et al. / Journal of Molecula86correlated to the bifurcated intramolecular hydrogen bonds

    that a NH group from the ampym NH2 moieties forms with

    the oxygen and nitrogen atoms of the adjacent water and

    thiocyanate ligands [N3/O1Z2.934(4) A,N3/N4Z3.073(4) A for the Ni(II) complex; N3/O1Z2.983(3) A,N3/N4Z3.123(2) A for the Co(II) compound; see alsoTable 2].

    The structure is further stabilized by intermolecular

    interactions between the other hydrogen atom of the NH2groups and sulfur atoms from neighboring complexes

    [N3/S1Z3.499(3) A in NiII compound and N3/S1Z3.522(2) A in CoII complex] and by intermolecular hydro-

    gen bonds that the coordinated water molecules form, as

    hydrogen donors, with the solvate ones [O1/O1SZ2.768(3) and 2.771(4) A for the Ni(II) complex; O1/O1Sand O1/O1SZ2.768(2) A for the Co(II) compound; seealso Table 3].

    The inversion-related aromatic rings show a slipped

    stacking to form chains running along the [001] (Ni) and

    [100] (Co) directions with the shortest ringring distance of

    3.324(4) and 3.342(4) A in the Ni(II) and Co(II)

    Table 3

    UV/vis absorption of the two complexes in different solvents

    Complexes/

    solvents/color

    l (nm) and 3 (l molK1 cmK1)

    [Ni(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O

    [Co(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O

    MeCN 383 (72.6); 625 (23.1);

    light blue

    563 (200.4); 630 (562);

    blue

    EtOH 400 (272); 664 (35);

    737 (26); light green

    480 (33.2); 524 (46.8);

    556 (44.2); 620 (57.1);

    blue purple

    DMF L402 (182); 679 (42);

    737 (26); light green

    485 (45.6); 587 (202);

    625 (346); blue

    Ether Green (weak solubility) 563 (104.6); 610 (214.6);

    635 (240.6); skyblue

    MeOH 397 (25.2); 666 (11.0);

    737 (10.0); light blue

    519 (42.4); 480 (30.2);

    pink

    Aceton Green (weak solubility) 537 (214.0); 632 (449.2);

    774 (9.6); deep bluecompounds, respectively (see Fig. 2). Also these inter-

    actions contribute to the stability of the complexes.

    Although the two structures are very similar, slight

    differences are visible. In the Ni(II) complex, the nearest

    atom to the metal center is the equatorial nitrogen N4, while

    in the Co(II) compound, it is the equatorial oxygen O1 from

    the coordinated water molecule. This slight distortion from

    octahedral could be induced by the hydrogen bond network,

    which involves, besides the above cited hydrogen

    Fig. 2. Crystal packing of the [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O complex

    (MZNi(II) and Co(II)) showing the pp interactions between the aromaticrings of neighboring molecules.

    r Structure 734 (2005) 8388respectively.

  • 3.3. Ligand-field spectroscopy

    The diffuse reflectance spectra of the solid Ni(II)

    compound shows three strong bands at 9.8!103 cmK1

    (s1;3A2g

    3T2g), 15.8! 103 cmK1 (s2;

    3A2g3T1g(F)) and

    25.7! 103 cmK1 (s3;3A2g

    3T1g(P)), which are the typical

    absorption bands for an octahedral Ni(II) complex[15]. Two

    strong bands at 30.3! 103 and 33.3!103 cmK1 are alsovisible, which are attributable to the LMCT from the ligands

    to the Ni(II) atom. The value calculated by semi-empirical

    equation[15] for the Dq (the crystal-field parameter), B

    (Racah parameter) and Dq/B are 980, 806 and 1.21 cmK1,

    respectively.

    The ligand-field spectrum of the solid Co(II) compound

    shows a strong band at 30.7!103 cmK1 corresponding tothe ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT) band, while

    3 K1 4 4

    compound can be found around 456, 506 nm in water and

    619 nm, respectively.

    The solvatochromism is caused by the different coordi-

    Y. Song et al. / Journal of Molecula478, 510 nm in MeOH, respectively. In ethanol, 3 dd bands

    can be seen clearly in the UV/vis spectrum at 470 nm,

    520 m and 604 nm. When the solvent used is MeCN, the

    dd bands shift significantly to around 561 and 627 nm,

    which indicates the change of the coordination geometry

    around Co(II). The charge transfer band which is a shoulder

    Fig. 3. UV/Vis spectra of [Co(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O in MeCN

    (8.1!10K4 m), Acetone (9.2!10K4 M), Diethyl Ether (3.1!10K3 M),the bands at 19.9!10 cm (s3; T1g(P) T1g(F)) and8.9!103 cmK1 (s1;

    4T2g4T1g) are typical for octahedrally

    coordinated Co(II) with this chromophore[16]. However, the

    band for the transition from 4A2g4A1g (s2) is not observed in

    the spectrum. The value calculated for the Dq, B and Dq/B [16]

    are 890, 811 and 1.10 cmK1, respectively.

    3.4. UV/vis spectra in solution

    The two compounds exhibit solvatochromism (Table 3

    and Fig. 3), and in the case of the Co(II) complex, the color

    changes from light pink (in H2O), to pink (in MeOH), blue

    purple (in EtOH) and sky blue (in diethyl ether) to deep blue

    (in DMF, Aceton, MeCN). The dd bands of the Co(II)DMF (7.0!10K4 M), EtOH (3.1!10K3 M) and MeOH (3.3!10K3 M).nation of the solvents to the metal centers and the resulting

    change of the coordination environment around the metal

    ions. For the Co(II) complex, the blue color in several

    different solvents indicates that the geometry around

    the metal must be distorted to tetrahedral or square

    pyramidal. When the coordinated water molecules in

    [Co(II)(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2]$2H2O are replaced byother solvents like aceton or acetonitrile, the coordination

    around Co(II) may change from octahedral to a tetra- or

    penta- coordination. For the Ni(II) complex, the color

    change is not so evident, which may indicate that the

    octahedral geometry around Ni(II) is maintained by

    replacing the water molecules with different solvents.

    The conductivities of these two complexes have been

    studied in MeOH, water and MeCN. The obtained values are

    quite small in MeOH and H2O, which is logical because the

    complexes are crystallized from the mixture of MeOH and

    water, and no dissociation occurs. In MeCN, the conduc-

    tivities of these two compounds are still below 40 cm2 UK1

    molK1, confirming that the thiocyanate groups are not

    dissociated from the metal ions too. Therefore, though the

    geometry around the metal ions may change in different

    solvents, the thiocyanate groups are still kept in the

    coordination surrounding around the metal ions.

    4. Conclusions

    In the present paper, two mononuclear isostructural

    Ni(II) and Co(II) complexes have been obtained, which

    show an octahedral geometry around the metal ions. Their

    crystal structures are stabilized by hydrogen bonding and

    pp interactions between 2-aminopyrimidine rings fromdifferent molecules. Both the compounds show solvatochro-

    ism which is due to the substitution of the water molecules

    arranged in an octahedral geometry around Ni(II) and Co(II)

    by other solvents. The change of the geometry and

    coordination environment around the metal centers leads

    to the color change and the shift of the charge transfer andpeak at around 320340 nm is overlapped by a very strong

    band around 290 nm in different solvents. So we believe that

    tetrahedral Co(II) or 5-coordinate Co(II) is present in the

    aprotic solvents.

    For the Ni(II) complex, the color changes are not so

    strong, from light blue (MeOH, H2O), to light green (EtOH)

    and to green (Ether, Aceton). The UV absorption bands can

    be found in the region of 388395 nm for the LMCT and

    two dd bands (one is in the range of 645654 and another

    one is in the range of 708720 nm, see Table 3) in water,

    methanol, EtOH and DMF. In Ether and MeCN, the charge

    transfer band shifts to 379 and 374 nm, and only one dd

    band in the visible range can be observed at 623 and

    r Structure 734 (2005) 8388 87dd bands in different solvents.

  • 5. Supplementary material

    Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for

    the structures reported have been deposited with the

    Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center as supplementary

    publication no. CCDC-242651 and 242652 for compounds

    (1) and (2), respectively, and can be obtained free of charge

    on application to the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge

    CB2 1EZ, UK. [Fax: (Internet.)C44-1223/336-033;e-mail: [email protected]]

    Acknowledgements

    The work described here has been supported by the

    Leiden University Study group WFMO (Werkgroep Fun-

    damenteel Materialen-Onderzoek). Support from the NRSC

    Catalysis (a Research School Combination of HRSMC and

    NIOK) is kindly acknowledged.

    References

    [1] D.E. Lynch, T. Latif, G. Smith, K.A. Byriel, C.H.L. Kennard,

    S. Parsons, Aust. J. Chem. 51 (1998) 403; V. Bertolasi, P. Gilli,

    [2] G.A. van Albada, I. Mutikainen, U. Turpeinen, J. Reedijk, Polyhedron

    23 (2004) 993.

    [3] G.A. van Albada, O. Roubeau, I. Mutikainen, U. Turpeinen,

    J. Reedijk, New. J. Chem. 27 (2003) 1693.

    [4] T.J. Kistenmacher, T. Sorrell, M. Rossi, C.C. Chiang,

    L.G. Marzilli, Inorg. Chem. 17 (1978) 479; P. Jensen,

    S.R. Batten, B. Moubaraki, K.S. Murray, Chem. Commun. 2000;

    793; M.E. Masaki, B.J. Prince, M.M. Turnbull, J. Coord. Chem.

    55 (2002) 1337; P. Lumme, I. Mutikainen, E. Lindell, Inorg.

    Chim. Acta-Articles 71 (1983) 217; P. Lumme, P. Kekarainen,

    H. Knuuttila, T. Kurkirinne, M. Latvala, L. Ronkonharju,

    S. Salonen, Finnish Chem. Lett. 1981; 25.

    [5] P.O. Lumme, H. Knuuttila, E. Lindell, Acta Crystallogr. Sect.

    C-Cryst. Struct. Commun. 52 (1996) 51.

    [6] W. Linert, Y. Fukuda, A. Camard, Coord. Chem. Rev. 218 (2001) 113.

    [7] Y. Marcus, Chem. Soc. Rev. 22 (1993) 409.

    [8] K. Sone, Y. Fukuda, Inorganic Thermochromism, Inorganic Chem-

    istry Concepts, vol. 10, Springer, Berlin, 1987.

    [9] SAINT, Software Users Guide, Version 6.0; Bruker Analytical

    X-ray Systems, Madison, WI 1999; G.M. Sheldrick, SADABS

    v2.03: Area-Detector Absorption Correction, University of

    Gottingen, Germany 1999.

    [10] A. Altomare, M.C. Burla, M. Camalli, G.L. Cascarano,

    C. Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, A.G.G. Moliterni, G. Polidori,

    R. Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32 (1999) 115.

    [11] G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refine-

    ment, University of Gottingen, Germany 1997.

    [12] M. Nardelli, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28 (1995) 659.

    [13] L.J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30 (1997) 565.

    Y. Song et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 734 (2005) 838888V. Ferretti, G. Gilli, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B-Struct. Sci. 57 (2001)

    591; K. Kobayashi, T. Shirasaka, K. Yamaguchi, S. Sakamoto,

    E. Horn, N. Furukawa, Chem. Commun. 2000; 41; A. Garcia-Raso,

    J.J. Fiol, F. Badenas, E. Lago, E. Molins, Polyhedron 20 (2001) 2877;

    A.J. Blake, P. Hubberstey, C.L. Sampson, Acta Crystallogr. Sect.

    E.-Struct. Rep. Online 58 (2002) m99.[14] K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and

    Coordination Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1978.

    [15] J. Reedijk, P.W.N.M. van Leeuwen, W.L. Groeneveld, Recl. Trav.

    Chim. Pays-Bas. 87 (1968) 129.

    [16] J. Reedijk, W.L. Driessen, W.L. Groeneveld, Recl. Trav. Chim. 88

    (1969) 1095.

    Synthesis, structural characterisation and solvatochromism of a Ni(II) and a Co(II) compound with 2-aminopyrimidine as a ligandIntroductionExperimental sectionGeneral remarks and physical measurementsGeneral synthesis of the complexesX-ray crystallographic study

    Results and discussionDescription of the structure [M(ampym)2(SCN)2(H2O)2].2H20 (M=Ni(II) and Co(II))Infrared spectroscopyLigand-field spectroscopyUV/vis spectra in solution

    ConclusionsSupplementary materialAcknowledgementsReferences