jnnurm.ppt
DESCRIPTION
detailed description about JNNURM schemeTRANSCRIPT
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF JNNURM
Presented By: R. Uttam Kumar
13AR60R36MCP 1st SEMESTER
Department of Architecture and Regional PlanningIIT Kharagpur
CONTENT
o INTRODUCTION
o SCOPE OF STUDY
o WHY JNNURM?
o JNNURM WORKING STRUCTURE
o CASESTUDY _ JNNURM IN PUNE
o OBSERVATIONS PER CAG’S REPORT
o INFERENCES
INTRODUCTIONJawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) is a massive city-modernisation scheme launched by the Government of India under Ministry of Urban Development. Named after Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, the scheme was officially inaugurated by prime minister Manmohan Singh on 3 December 2005 as a programme meant to improve the quality of life and infrastructure in the cities.
• Largest Urban Initiative in the history of the country
• Duration of the mission would be seven years beginning from 2005-06.
• Rs 50,000 crores over 7 years
• 63 qualifying cities & 9 eligible sectors
Source: www.jnnurm.nic.in
WHY JNNURM?
• Increase in urban population
• Increasing dependence of productivity of cities
•Increase in urban slums
•Lack of infrastructure supporting the rise in population
Source: www.censusindia.gov.in
JNNURM - INTENT
JNNURM aimed at creating economically productive, efficient, equitable, and responsive cities, focusing on
a) Development of economic and social infrastructure and renewal of inner
areas
b) Ensuring basic services to the poor
c) Undertaking wide-ranging reforms - eliminating legal, institutional
and financial bottlenecks
d) Strengthening municipal governments and their functioning in accordance
with 74th CAA.
ForOthercities
UIDSSMT &IHSDP
Track-IITrack-II
JNNURMFor
63 Identifiedcities
Track-ITrack-I
JNNURM-Two Track Strategy
MISSION COVERAGE
A Cities/UAs with 4 million plus population as per 2001 census
07
B Cities/UAs with 1 million plus but less than 4 millionpopulation as per 2001 Census
28
C Selected Cities/UAs (State Capitals and other cities/UA ofreligious/historic and touristic importance)
28
63 cities in total including mega cities, million-plus cities and cities of religious/historic/tourist significance
MISSION OBJECTIVES
5Redevelopment
of old cities
4Provision of
services for theurban poor
3Planned
development ofcities
2Ensure
adequate fundsto fulfill
deficiencies1Integrated
development ofinfrastructure
services
6Secure effective
linkages betweenasset creation &
asset management
Encourage reformsand fast track
planneddevelopment
MISSION STRATEGY
5Optimizing to reduce
Life cycle costs
4Direct fund flow
Encourage reformsand fast track
planneddevelopment
3Release and
leveraging of funds
2Preparation of
project
1Preparing city
development plan
6Encouraging PPP’s
MISSION COMPONENTS
Admissible Components:
Urban Renewal
Water Supply (including
Desalination & Sewerage)
Solid Waste Management
Storm Water Drains
Urban Transport
Parking spaces on PPP basis
Development of heritage areas
Prevention & rehabilitation
of soil erosion (only in case
of Special Category States)
Preservation of water bodies
Inadmissible Components:
Power
Telecom
Health
Education
Wage employment & staff components
UIDSSMT:
Power and telecommunication work
Rolling stock like buses and tram
Health and educational institution
Urban transport (MRTS, LRTS etc.)
Wage employment and staff component
FUNDING PATTERN
Urban Infrastructure and GovernanceFunding Pattern
Grant ULB/Parastatals/Loan fromFinancialInstitution
Centre State
Cities with 4 million plus population
50% 15% 35%
Cities with million plus but less than 4million population
30% 20% 50%
Cities in North Eastern States andJ&K
90% 10%
Other Cities 80% 10% 10%
Setting up de-salination plants 80% 10% 10%
EXPECTED OUTCOMES
• Operate with modern and transparent financial management systems.
• Financially self-sustaining agencies for urban governance
• City-wide framework for planning and governance to become operational.
• Up gradation of urban infrastructure.
• Access to basic level of urban services to all urban residents.
• E-governance applications in core functions of ULB’s/ Parastatal agencies
CASE STUDY - VIJAYAWADA
Vijayawada is the third largest city in Andhra Pradesh after Hyderabad and Vishakapatnam.
It is one of the major railway junction connecting the northern and southern parts of India
It is considered as the agricultural and commercial capital of the state
Main Features of the project:
•Sewerage connection available on demand
•Reduced complaints on mosquitoes and flies
•Improved health and hygiene situation
•Savings cost due to septic tank cleaning and initial construction cost
CASE STUDY - SURAT
Surat is the second largest city in Gujarat after Ahmedabad
It is known for textile trade and diamond cutting& manufacturing industries
CASE STUDY - CHENNAI
Chennai is the capital city of Tamil Nadu state and fourth largest metropolitan city
The metropolitan area consists of 1 cantonment, 4 townships, 16 municipalities, 20 special village panchayats and 213 village panchayats
It is a major port and trade city which acts as gateway in the southern part of India
CASE STUDY - MADURAI
Madurai is a temple town situated on river Vaigai and third largest city in Tamil Nadu state
It’s a pilgrimage centre and has Meenakshi temple at its core
CASE STUDY - BANGALORE
Bangalore which is major IT industry based city has many slums which is significantly tampering the city’s prestige
The JNNURM scheme intended to alleviate the social status of this slums in the period of 7 seven years
The team of CIVIC had conducted a survey on the slums and its conditions deducing to a form indicator based analysis
OBSERVATIONS FROM CAG’S REPORT
•A total of 1517 and 1298 housing and urban infrastructure projects respectively were approved and only 22 housing projects were completed and regarding urban infrastructure projects only 231 projects out 1298.
•The mandatory and optional reforms were not implemented thus the objective of bringing about reforms in institutional, financial and structural governance of the ULB’s could not be achieved
•From the audit reports it has been estimated that almost 1112.4 crores have been in loss in accountability.
•There is no adequate staff working under various ministries to get the expected outcome which lies as major drawback in the implementation of the scheme.
1. Efficiency of urban governance and delivery of services depends on the efficacy of institutions of governance. This calls for urgent attention and priority action under JNNURM and the Mission document must reflect this.
2. A major failure of city governance has been our inability to address the needs of the poor - basic services like drinking water supply, sanitation, housing and social services are not available to an increasing share of urban population.
3.Incentives to those states which are implementing the reforms envisaged in JNNURM guidelines.
4.Government should review the status of all housing projects and step up efforts to make allotment to eligible beneficiaries.
5.Government should strengthen the monitoring system of the execution of the projects.
6.The fiscal structure needs to be given more transparency and monitoring such that there is no monetary loss.
INFERENCES