job inteview
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Job inteview](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5499b17bb4795927268b46c2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
JOB INTERVIEW Ma. Fernanda Bañuelos Glion V
![Page 2: Job inteview](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5499b17bb4795927268b46c2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Definition
AN INTERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHETHER AN APPLICANT IS SUITABLE
FOR A POSITION OF EMPLOYMENT
Is the most common tool that job seekers finds in its way…
Strategies to make better the interview:
1) Structure it in a way that is reliable and valid,
2) Train managers to apply the best techniques of the method.
![Page 3: Job inteview](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5499b17bb4795927268b46c2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Types
TYPES OF
INTERVIEWS
By Structur
e
StructuredIt is based on a preset form. It is more reliable and valid than the next one.
Unestructured
Does not follow a script or a set order. The questions are not prepared in advance and there is no guarantee to them by the same applicants. The interviewer does not have a rating system.
Based on
Experience
Behavioral Description Interview
(BDI)
Which respondents are asked to actual incidents that have relevant work experience to the position requested. The BDI is based on the premise that the past is what best predicts the future.
Situational Interview
(SI)
Seeks to determine whether the applicant possesses the knowledge and motivation to the job, but achieves this goal differently. The questions is to encourage respondents to respond to hypothetical situations they would face in office seeking.
![Page 4: Job inteview](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5499b17bb4795927268b46c2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Interviewer’s trainning
Despite the recent optimism about the validity of job interviews, have yet to answer many questions about its effectiveness. For
years there have been fears that the accuracy of interviewers vary too, well, it's always in the possibility of their prejudice,
since the interviews rely on subjective judgments. The following list summarizes the
problems that limit the accuracy of an interview feature. These errors are the
focus of many training programs for interviewers:
![Page 5: Job inteview](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5499b17bb4795927268b46c2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The interviewer speaks a lot.
Reduce the amount of job information obtained from the interviewees.
Inconstant questions asked to applicants
Resulting in different information that is collected from each.
Questions not related
Does not give any information of matter to the job.
Make the interviewee nervous
Makes the spontaneous gathering information
Excessive confidence
Leads to hasty decisions
Typify applicants allow personal preferences to influence the evaluation.
Allow influences Be influenced by the nonverbal behavior of applicants.
Leniency mistake Put high ratings to all the applicants.
Central tendency mistake
Put medium ratings to all the applicants.
Severe mistake Put low ratings to all the applicants.
Halo mistake Allow certain features, good or bad, influence the evaluation of other characteristics
Contrast effect Allow the quality of applicants that preceded the current influence their ratings
The first printing mistake
To evaluate the applicant in the first minutes of the interview
Look-like-me mistake
Favorably evaluate an applicant because he looks the interviewer in some way
![Page 6: Job inteview](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5499b17bb4795927268b46c2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In general, well-designed training programs are able to reduce many mistakes in traditional
unstructured interviews, especially when training is done together with a structured interview
format.
Through training, managers better understand how to ask questions, how to record responses from the
applicants and, to some extent, how to become aware of possible trends.
Moreover, recent studies indicate that when a trained interviewer takes notes on behavior during the
interview, its validity improvement.