joback method
TRANSCRIPT
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 14
Joback method
The Joback method[1] (often named JobackReid
method) predicts eleven important and commonly used
pure component thermodynamic properties from molec-
ular structure only
1 Basic Principles
11 Group Contribution Method
Principle of a Group Contribution Method
The Joback method is a group contribution method
These kind of methods use basic structural information
of a chemical molecule like a list of simple functional
groups adds parameters to these functional groups and
calculates thermophysical and transport properties as afunction of the sum of group parameters
Joback assumes that there are no interactions between
the groups and therefore only uses additive contributions
and no contributions for interactions between groups
Other group contribution methods especially methods
like UNIFAC which estimate mixture properties like ac-
tivity coefficients use both simple additive group param-
eters and group interaction parameters The big advan-
tage of using only simple group parameters is the small
number of needed parameters The number of needed
group interaction parameters gets very high for an in-
creasing number of groups (1 for two groups 3 for threegroups 6 for four groups 45 for ten groups and twice as
much if the interactions are not symmetric)
Nine of the properties are single temperature-
independent values mostly estimated by a simple
sum of group contribution plus an addend Two of
the estimated properties are temperature-dependent
the ideal gas heat capacity and the dynamic viscosity
of liquids The heat capacity polynomial uses four
parameters and the viscosity equation only 2 In both
cases the equation parameters are calculated by group
contributions
12 History
The Joback method is an extension of the Lydersen
method[2] and uses very similar groups formulas and
parameters for the three properties the Lydersen already
supported (critical temperature critical pressure critical
volume)
Joback extended the range of supported properties cre-
ated new parameters and modified slightly the formulas
of the old Lydersen method
2 Model Strengths and Weak-
nesses
21 Strengths
The popularity and success of the Joback method mainly
originates from the single group list for all properties
This allows one to get all eleven supported properties
from a single analysis of the molecular structure
The Joback method additionally uses a very simple and
easy to assign group scheme which makes the methodusable also for people with only basic chemical knowl-
edge
22 Weaknesses
Newer developments of estimation methods[3][4] have
shown that the quality of the Joback method is limited
The original authors already stated themselves in the orig-
inal paper ldquoHigh accuracy is not claimed but the pro-
posed method are often as or more accurate than tech-
niques in common use todayrdquoThe list of groups dont cover many common molecules
sufficiently Especially aromatic compounds are not
1
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 24
2 3 FORMULAS
Systematic Errors of the Joback Method (Normal Boiling Point)
differentiated from normal ring containing components
This is a severe problem because aromatic and aliphaticcomponents differ strongly
The data base Joback and Reid used for obtaining the
group parameters was rather small and covered only a
limited number of different molecules The best cov-
erage has been achieved for normal boiling points (438
components) and the worst for heat of fusion (155 com-
ponents) Current developments that can use data banks
like the Dortmund Data Bank or the DIPPR data base
have a much broader coverage
The formula used for the prediction of the normal boil-
ing point shows another problem Joback assumed a con-
stant contribution of added groups in homologous serieslike the alkanes This doesnt describe the real behavior
of the normal boiling points correctly[5] Instead of the
constant contribution a decrease of the contribution with
increasing number of groups must be applied The cho-
sen formula of the Joback method leads to high deviations
for large and small molecules and an acceptable good es-
timation only for mid-sized components
3 Formulas
In the following formulas Gᵢ denotes a group contribution
Gᵢ are counted for every single available group If a group
is present multiple times each occurrence is counted sep-
arately
31 Normal Boiling Point
T b = 198 + sum
T bi
32 Melting Point
T m = 1225 + sum
T mi
33 Critical Temperature
T c = T b
9831310584 + 0965
sumT ci minus (
sumT ci)
2983133minus1
This critical temperature equation needs a normal boiling
point T If an experimental value is available it is recom-
mended to use this boiling point It is on the other handalso possible to input the normal boiling point estimated
by the Joback method This will lead to a higher error
34 Critical Pressure
P c = [0113 + 00032 lowast N A minus
sumP ci]
minus2
NA Number of atoms in the molecular structure (includ-
ing hydrogens)
35 Critical Volume
V c = 175 + sum
V ci
36 Heat of Formation (Ideal Gas 298 K)
H formation = 6829 + sum
H formi
37 Gibbs Energy of Formation (Ideal Gas
298 K)
Gformation = 5388 + sum
Gformi
38 Heat Capacity (Ideal Gas)
C P = sum
ai minus 379 3 + [sum
bi + 0210]T +1048667sumci minus 391 middot 10minus4
1048669T 2 +
1048667sumdi + 206 middot 10minus7
1048669T 3
The Joback method uses a four parameter polynomial to
describe the temperature dependency of the ideal gas heat
capacity These parameters are valid from 273 K to ap-
prox 1000 K
39 Heat of Vaporization at Normal Boil-
ing Point
∆H vap = 1530 + sum
H vapi
310 Heat of Fusion
∆H fus = minus088 + sum
H fusi
311 Liquid Dynamic Viscosity
ηL = M we[sum
ηaminus59782]T +sum
ηbminus11202
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 34
3
M Molecular Weight
The method uses a two parameter equation to describe
the temperature dependency of the dynamic viscosity
The authors state that the parameters are valid from the
melting temperature up to 07 of the critical temperature
(Tᵣlt07)
4 Group Contributions
5 Example Calculation
Acetone (Propanone) is the simplest ketone and is sepa-
rated into three groups in the Joback method two methyl
groups (-CH3) and one ketone group (C=O) Since the
methyl group is present twice its contributions have to
be added twice
6 References
[1] Joback KG Reid RC ldquoEstimation of Pure-Component
Properties from Group-Contributionsrdquo Chem Eng Com-
mun 57 233ndash243 1987
[2] Lydersen AL ldquoEstimation of Critical Properties of Or-
ganic Compoundsrdquo University of Wisconsin College En-
gineering Eng Exp Stn Rep 3 Madison Wisconsin
1955
[3] Constantinou L Gani R ldquoNew Group Contribution
Method for Estimating Properties of Pure Compoundsrdquo
AIChE J 40(10) 1697ndash1710 1994
[4] Nannoolal Y Rarey J Ramjugernath J ldquoEstimation of
pure component properties Part 2 Estimation of critical
property data by group contributionrdquo Fluid Phase Equi-
lib 252(1ndash2) 1ndash27 2007
[5] Stein SE Brown RL ldquoEstimation of Normal Boiling
Points from Group Contributionsrdquo J Chem Inf Comput
Sci 34 581ndash587 (1994)
7 External links
bull Online property estimation with the Joback method
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 44
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 24
2 3 FORMULAS
Systematic Errors of the Joback Method (Normal Boiling Point)
differentiated from normal ring containing components
This is a severe problem because aromatic and aliphaticcomponents differ strongly
The data base Joback and Reid used for obtaining the
group parameters was rather small and covered only a
limited number of different molecules The best cov-
erage has been achieved for normal boiling points (438
components) and the worst for heat of fusion (155 com-
ponents) Current developments that can use data banks
like the Dortmund Data Bank or the DIPPR data base
have a much broader coverage
The formula used for the prediction of the normal boil-
ing point shows another problem Joback assumed a con-
stant contribution of added groups in homologous serieslike the alkanes This doesnt describe the real behavior
of the normal boiling points correctly[5] Instead of the
constant contribution a decrease of the contribution with
increasing number of groups must be applied The cho-
sen formula of the Joback method leads to high deviations
for large and small molecules and an acceptable good es-
timation only for mid-sized components
3 Formulas
In the following formulas Gᵢ denotes a group contribution
Gᵢ are counted for every single available group If a group
is present multiple times each occurrence is counted sep-
arately
31 Normal Boiling Point
T b = 198 + sum
T bi
32 Melting Point
T m = 1225 + sum
T mi
33 Critical Temperature
T c = T b
9831310584 + 0965
sumT ci minus (
sumT ci)
2983133minus1
This critical temperature equation needs a normal boiling
point T If an experimental value is available it is recom-
mended to use this boiling point It is on the other handalso possible to input the normal boiling point estimated
by the Joback method This will lead to a higher error
34 Critical Pressure
P c = [0113 + 00032 lowast N A minus
sumP ci]
minus2
NA Number of atoms in the molecular structure (includ-
ing hydrogens)
35 Critical Volume
V c = 175 + sum
V ci
36 Heat of Formation (Ideal Gas 298 K)
H formation = 6829 + sum
H formi
37 Gibbs Energy of Formation (Ideal Gas
298 K)
Gformation = 5388 + sum
Gformi
38 Heat Capacity (Ideal Gas)
C P = sum
ai minus 379 3 + [sum
bi + 0210]T +1048667sumci minus 391 middot 10minus4
1048669T 2 +
1048667sumdi + 206 middot 10minus7
1048669T 3
The Joback method uses a four parameter polynomial to
describe the temperature dependency of the ideal gas heat
capacity These parameters are valid from 273 K to ap-
prox 1000 K
39 Heat of Vaporization at Normal Boil-
ing Point
∆H vap = 1530 + sum
H vapi
310 Heat of Fusion
∆H fus = minus088 + sum
H fusi
311 Liquid Dynamic Viscosity
ηL = M we[sum
ηaminus59782]T +sum
ηbminus11202
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 34
3
M Molecular Weight
The method uses a two parameter equation to describe
the temperature dependency of the dynamic viscosity
The authors state that the parameters are valid from the
melting temperature up to 07 of the critical temperature
(Tᵣlt07)
4 Group Contributions
5 Example Calculation
Acetone (Propanone) is the simplest ketone and is sepa-
rated into three groups in the Joback method two methyl
groups (-CH3) and one ketone group (C=O) Since the
methyl group is present twice its contributions have to
be added twice
6 References
[1] Joback KG Reid RC ldquoEstimation of Pure-Component
Properties from Group-Contributionsrdquo Chem Eng Com-
mun 57 233ndash243 1987
[2] Lydersen AL ldquoEstimation of Critical Properties of Or-
ganic Compoundsrdquo University of Wisconsin College En-
gineering Eng Exp Stn Rep 3 Madison Wisconsin
1955
[3] Constantinou L Gani R ldquoNew Group Contribution
Method for Estimating Properties of Pure Compoundsrdquo
AIChE J 40(10) 1697ndash1710 1994
[4] Nannoolal Y Rarey J Ramjugernath J ldquoEstimation of
pure component properties Part 2 Estimation of critical
property data by group contributionrdquo Fluid Phase Equi-
lib 252(1ndash2) 1ndash27 2007
[5] Stein SE Brown RL ldquoEstimation of Normal Boiling
Points from Group Contributionsrdquo J Chem Inf Comput
Sci 34 581ndash587 (1994)
7 External links
bull Online property estimation with the Joback method
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 44
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 34
3
M Molecular Weight
The method uses a two parameter equation to describe
the temperature dependency of the dynamic viscosity
The authors state that the parameters are valid from the
melting temperature up to 07 of the critical temperature
(Tᵣlt07)
4 Group Contributions
5 Example Calculation
Acetone (Propanone) is the simplest ketone and is sepa-
rated into three groups in the Joback method two methyl
groups (-CH3) and one ketone group (C=O) Since the
methyl group is present twice its contributions have to
be added twice
6 References
[1] Joback KG Reid RC ldquoEstimation of Pure-Component
Properties from Group-Contributionsrdquo Chem Eng Com-
mun 57 233ndash243 1987
[2] Lydersen AL ldquoEstimation of Critical Properties of Or-
ganic Compoundsrdquo University of Wisconsin College En-
gineering Eng Exp Stn Rep 3 Madison Wisconsin
1955
[3] Constantinou L Gani R ldquoNew Group Contribution
Method for Estimating Properties of Pure Compoundsrdquo
AIChE J 40(10) 1697ndash1710 1994
[4] Nannoolal Y Rarey J Ramjugernath J ldquoEstimation of
pure component properties Part 2 Estimation of critical
property data by group contributionrdquo Fluid Phase Equi-
lib 252(1ndash2) 1ndash27 2007
[5] Stein SE Brown RL ldquoEstimation of Normal Boiling
Points from Group Contributionsrdquo J Chem Inf Comput
Sci 34 581ndash587 (1994)
7 External links
bull Online property estimation with the Joback method
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 44
8102019 Joback Method
httpslidepdfcomreaderfulljoback-method 44