Repor

ENVIRO

110-112EI ReporDate: Copies 1 Soft C2 Hard C

1 Origin

Author:

EMMANEnvironm © 2014 EnvThis reportdistributed

rt Distrib

NMENTAL S2 Addison Rort No.

Copy (PDF –Copies (sen

nal (Saved to

:

NUEL WOEmental Scie

vironmental Invt is protected byin full and with

bution

SITE ASSES

oad, MarricE22157 2nd May

– Secured, nt by Expres

o Digital Ar

ELDERS entist

vestigations Auy copyright lawh prior written p

SMENT ckville AA 2014

issued by emss Courier)

rchives)

ustralia Pty Ltd and may only b

permission by E

Recmail) Mr

5/2CO

EnvSuiPY

Tec

ERSen

T/A Environmbe reproduced, EI.

cipient John F. Wa47 Oberon

OOGEE NSW

vironmentalite 6.01, 55

YRMONT N

chnical Rev

IC GERGEnior Project

mental Investigatin electronic or

alsh Street, W 2034

l InvestigatiMiller Stree

NSW 2009

viewer:

ER Engineer

tions (EI) r hard copy form

ions et,

mat, if it is cop

ied and

Environm110-112 AReport No

1.0 I2.0 O

2.1 2.2

3.0 S3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4

4.0 S4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6

5.0 P5.1

6.0 S6.1 6.2

6.26.2

7.0 A7.1 7.2

8.0 D8.1

8.2 8.3 8.38.38.38.38.38.3

9.0 R9.1

9.19.19.1

9.2 9.29.29.29.29.2

ental Site AssAddison Road,o.E22157 AA

INTRODUCOBJECTIV

OBJECTIV

SCOPE OF

SITE DESCPROPERTY

LOCAL LA

REGIONAL

GROUNDW

SITE CONSITE LAND

SURROUN

COUNCIL

WORKCO

HAZARDO

SITE WAL

PRELIMINDATA GA

SAMPLINGDATA QU

ADOPTED

.1 Soil Cr

.2 GroundASSESSME

SOIL INVE

GROUNDW

DATA QUAQUALITY

Field QLABOR

.1 Sample

.2 Test M

.3 Method

.4 Labora

.5 Labora

.6 Matrix RESULTS

SOIL RESU

.1 Sub-Su

.2 Soil La

.3 DiscusGROUNDW

.1 Ground

.2 Ground

.3 Ground

.4 Ground

.4 Discus

essment , Marrickville 2nd May 2014

CTION VES AND SVES

WORKS CRIPTIONY IDENTIFIC

AND USE L SETTINGS WATER BOR

TAMINATD TITLES IN

NDING LAND

INFORMATI

OVER NSW AOUS CHEMIC

LKOVER INS

NARY CONAPS G, ANALY

UALITY INDIC

D ASSESSMEN

riteria dwater CriteENT METHESTIGATION

WATER INVE

ALITY ASCONTROL P

QA/QC DataRATORY QA/e Holding T

Methods and d Blanks atory Duplicatory Contro

Spikes AND DISCULTS

urface Condaboratory Rsion of SoilWATER RESU

dwater Mondwater Fielddwater Flowdwater Analsion of Gro

NSW 4

TABL

SCOPE OF

N CATION, LOC

RE RECORDS

TION APPRNFORMATION

DS HISTORIC

ION AUTHORITY

CALS AND RE

PECTION

NCEPTUA

YTICAL ANCATORS

NT CRITERIA

eria HODOLOG

ESTIGATION

SESSMENPROGRAM

a Evaluation/QC

Times Practical Q

cate Sampleol Samples

CUSSION

ditions esults l ResultsULTS nitoring Wed Observatiw Directionlytical Resuundwater R

i

LE OF CO

F WORK

CATION AND

S AND LOCA

RAISALN / HISTORIC

CAL AERIAL

Y SEARCH

REGULATORY

AL SITE M

ND QUALI

A

GY

N

NT

n

Quantitation

es

ll Constructons

ultsResults

iii

NTENTS

D PHYSICAL

L GROUNDW

C AERIAL RPHOTOGRA

Y COMPLIAN

MODEL

ITY PLAN

Limits (PQ

tion

SETTING

WATER USE

EVIEW

APHY REVIEW

NCE

N (SAQP)

QLs)

W

1 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 8 8

10 12 12 12 12 14 14 16 17 19 19 21 23 23 24 27 27 28 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 33 33 33 34 36 37 37 37 38 38 39


10.0 C11.0 S

REFER

ABBRE TABLE

TABLE 3TABLE 3TABLE 3TABLE 3TABLE 4

MATABLE 4TABLE 5TABLE 6TABLE 6TABLE 6TABLE 6


SOIPER


MET FIGURE

1. S2. S APPEN

A NB LC ND QE BF SG L

ental Site AssAddison Road,o.E22157 AA

CONCLUSSTATEME

RENCES

EVIATION

E 3-1: SITE 3-2: LOCA3-3: TOPO3-4: SUM4-1-1: SU

ARRICKVILL4-2: SUM5-1: PREL6-1: DATA6-2: DATA6-3: DATA6-4: SUM

20 6-5: SUM7-1: SOIL7-2: GROU8-1: SAM8-2: SUMIL AND GRORCENTAGE D9-1: SUM9-2: SOIL9-3: GROU9-4: FIEL9-5: SUMTALS, PAHS

ES

Site LocatioSite Samplin

NDICES

NR Atlas GrLand Titles NSW WorkQuality AssuBorehole LoSample RecLaboratory A


SIONS ANDENT OF LI

NS

IDENTIFICAAL LAND USOGRAPHICA

MMARY OF RUMMARY OFLE

MMARY OF SLIMINARY CA QUALITY A QUALITY A QUALITY

MMARY OF S

MMARY OF SL SAMPLINGUNDWATER

MPLING DATAMMARY OF LOUNDWATERDIFFERENCE

MMARY OF SL LABORATOUNDWATERD-BASED GR

MMARY OF GS, BTEX, TPH

on Plan ng Plan

roundwaterSearch Cover Searurance / Quogs ceipt AdviceAnalytical R

NSW 4

D RECOMMITATIO

ATION, LOCASE

AL, GEOLOGREGISTEREDF OWNERS –

URROUNDINCONCEPTUA

OBJECTIVEASSURANCINDICATORITE ASSESSM

ITE ASSESSMG METHODOLR SAMPLINGA QUALITY

LABORATORR, FIELD QC ES (% RPD)UB-SURFAC

ORY RESULTR MONITORIROUNDWAT

GROUNDWAHS

r Bore Searc

ch uality Contr

e & Chain-oReports

i

MMENDATONS

ATION AND

GICAL AND HD GROUNDW– LOTS 1 IN D

NG LAND AAL SITE MODESCE PROCEDURS (NSW DECMENT CRIT

MENT CRITLOGY

G METHODOINDICATOR

RY RESULTSC DUPLICATE

CE CONDITIOTSING WELL CTER MEASU

ATER LABOR

ch

rol

of-Custody

iv

TIONS

D ZONING

HYDROGEOLWATER BORE

D.P. 527129 –

ERIAL PHOTDEL

URESC, 2005)ERIA FOR SO

ERIA FOR G

OLOGYRSS FOR BFD SAES, WITH CA

ONS

CONSTRUCTUREMENTSRATORY ANA

Certificates

LOGICAL INES WITHIN 1– 110-112 AD

TOGRAPH R

OIL INVEST

GILS

AMPLES ANALCULATED

TION DETAIL

ALYSIS RES

s

NFORMATIO1 KM OF THE

DDISON ROA

REVIEW

TIGATION LE

ND ILD SAMPD RELATIVE

LS

SULTS – HEA

42 43

4 5

ON 5 E SITE. 7

AD, 9

11 15 16 17 18

EVELS (SILS

22 23 25 27

PLES FOR E

32 34 35 37 38

AVY 41

7

S)


1.0 I

Environm

Environm

site’), as

P12508

The site

Area of

total area

Propose

The purp

Develop

mixed co

Regulato

The follo

report:

NE

Na

Am

NE

Pro

En

(A

Co

Co

(N

NS

AN

Ma

ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 2nd

INTRODUC

mental Inv

mental Site

s shown in

dated 21st M

is further

Marrickville

a of a 1,493

ed Developm

pose of this

pment Appli

ommercial a

ory Framew

owing regu

EPC (2013)

ational Env

mendment 2

EPC (2013

otection (A

nvironment

ANZECC an

ontaminated

onservation

NHMRC);

SW DEC, 2

NZECC &

Marine Water

essment , MarrickvilleMay 2014

CTION

vestigations

e Assessmen

Figure 1.

March 2014

identified a

e Municipal

3.3m2.

ment

s ESA is to

ication to M

and residen

work

latory fram

) Schedule

vironment P

2013, Natio

) Schedule

Assessment o

Protection C

nd NHMRC

d Sites, pu

Council (A

2006 Guidel

ARMCAN

r Quality; an

NSW

(EI) was

nt (ESA) a

This ESA

.

as Lot 1 in

Council, Pa

evaluate the

Marrickville

ntial land use

ework and

B(1) Guide

Protection

nal Environ

B(2) Guid

of Site Con

Council, M

C January, 1

ublished by

ANZECC) a

lines for the

NZ (2000) A

nd the NSW

1

engaged b

at 110-112

was carrie

DP527129

arish of Pete

e potential f

e Municipali

es.

guidelines w

eline on Inv

(Assessmen

nment Prote

deline on S

ntamination)

May 2013;

1992) Guide

y the Austr

and the Na

e NSW Site A

Australian

W EPA (199

by Mr Joh

Addison Ro

ed out in ac

being situa

ersham and C

for contami

ity Council

were consid

vestigation

nt of Site

ection Coun

Site Charac

) Measure 1

elines for th

ralian and

ational Heal

Auditor Sch

and New Z

95) Samplin

hn Francis

oad, Marric

ccordance w

ated within

County of C

ination on s

to include

dered during

Levels for

Contamina

ncil, May 20

cterisation,

1999 – Ame

he Assessme

New Zeal

lth and Med

heme;

Zealand Gu

g Design G

Walsh to

ckville (hen

with EI pro

the Local

Cumberland

site as part o

site redevel

g the prepar

Soil and G

ation) Meas

013;

National E

endment 20

ent and Ma

land Envir

dical Resea

uidelines fo

Guidelines.

conduct a

nceforth ‘th

oposal – re

Governmen

d, covering

of any futur

lopment int

ration of thi

Groundwater

sure 1999

Environmen

013, Nationa

anagement o

onment an

arch Counc

r Fresh an

an

he

f.

nt

a

re

to

is

r,

–

nt

al

of

nd

il

nd


2.0 O

2.1 O

The prin

E

u

I

s

The inv

Environm

National

Guidelin

2.2 S

In order

the min

contamin

Desktop

A re

the p

Sear

order

neigh

A la

infor

Site

relat


OBJECTIV

OBJECTIVE

ncipal objec

Evaluate th

uses and an

Investigate

sampling an

vestigation

ment Protec

l Environm

nes for the A

SCOPE OF W

r to achieve

nimum req

nated sites,

p Study

eview of rel

project area;

ch of histo

r to review

hbouring ar

and titles s

rmation rela

history surv

ing to opera


VES AND S

S

tives of this

he potential

necdotal and

the degree

nd laborator

follows st

ction (Asse

ment Protec

Assessment

WORKS

e the above

quirements

the scope o

levant topog

;

rical aerial

w previous

rea;

search, also

ating to site

vey involvin

ational site h

NSW

SCOPE OF

s ESA were

for contam

d documenta

e of any p

ry analysis,

andard env

ssment of S

ction Counc

of Contami

objective,

of the E

of works wa

graphical, g

photograph

site use an

o conducte

ownership;

ng a detaile

history and/

2

F WORK

e to:

mination to b

ary evidenc

potential co

for relevan

vironmental

Site Contam

cil, May 2

inated Sites

and in keep

EPA/DECC

as as follow

geological,

hs archived

nd the histo

ed through

;

ed search of

/or relevant

be present o

ce of possibl

ontamination

nt contamina

l procedure

mination) M

2013 and th

s (ANZECC

ping the pro

guideline

s:

hydrogeolo

d at NSW L

orical sequ

NSW Lan

f Marrickvil

t environme

on site base

le pollutant

n by mean

ants of conc

es as descr

Measure 199

he Australi

C/NHMRC 2

oject cost-e

s for con

gical and s

Land and P

ence of lan

nd and Pro

le Council r

ental inciden

ed on the hi

sources; an

ns of limite

cern.

ribed in th

99 – Amend

ian and Ne

2000).

effective wh

nsultants re

soil landscap

Property Inf

nd developm

operty Info

records for

nts;

istorical site

nd

ed intrusive

he Nationa

dment 2013

ew Zealand

hile meeting

eporting on

pe maps fo

formation in

ment in the

rmation fo

information

e

e

al

3,

d

g

n

or

n

e

or

n


A se

statu

Cont

A se

Work

A rev

Field W

A de

Cons

trian

Insta

asses

the p

Mult

from

Labo

from

Data

repor


arch throug

utory notice

taminated L

arch of the

kCover NSW

view of exi

Work

etailed site w

struction of

ngular grid p

allation and

ssment wor

potential for

tiple level s

m the newly

oratory anal

m the site his

a interpreta

rting.


gh the NSW

es current o

Land Manag

Stored Che

W relating t

sting underg

walkover in

f test boreh

pattern acro

d developm

rks and insta

r groundwat

soil samplin

constructed

lysis of sele

story survey

ation in rel

NSW

W EPA / OEH

on the site

gement Act

emical Infor

to possible

ground serv

nspection;

holes at sev

ss accessibl

ment of thre

alled to stan

ter contamin

ng down to

d groundwat

ected soil sa

y and field o

lation to ad

3

H Land Inf

under the

(1997);

rmation Dat

undergroun

vices on site

ven prelimin

le areas of t

ee (3) groun

ndard enviro

nation and o

o natural so

ter monitor

amples for

observation

dopted soil

formation re

Unhealthy

tabase (SCI

nd tank appr

e.

nary locatio

the site;

ndwater mo

onmental re

off-site mig

oils and one

ing wells;

relevant an

s during the

l and grou

ecords to co

Building L

D) and mic

rovals and l

ons (BH1 –

onitoring w

equirements

gration of co

e round of

nalytical par

e investigati

undwater as

onfirm that

Land Act (1

crofiche reco

locations; an

– BH7) dist

wells drilled

s, in order to

ontaminants

groundwat

rameters as

ion program

ssessment

there are no

990) or the

ords held by

nd

tributed in a

d during th

o investigat

s;

ter sampling

determined

m; and

criteria and

o

e

y

a

he

te

g

d

d


3.0 S

3.1 P

The site

locality i

Table 3-

Street A

Location

Site Are

Site Own

Lot and

State Su

Local G

Parish

County

Current

The site

vacated

building

plan illu


SITE DESC

PROPERTY I

identificati

is shown in

-1: Site

Attribute

Address

n Description

ea/GDA

ner

Deposited Pl

urvey Marks

Government A

t Zoning

e is a sligh

car washin

g previously

ustrating the


CRIPTION

IDENTIFICA

ion details a

n Figure 1.

Identificatio

e

n

lan (DP)

Authority

htly skewed

ng facility,

y used for am

assessment

NSW

N

ATION, LOC

and associat

on, Locatio

110-112 Ad

Located app(north-east)west), and I

0.14933 hecSouthern ea

Mr John Fra

Lot 1 in DP

Two State Sthe Corner of Addison

Marrickvill

Petersham

Cumberland

B4 –Mixed

d rectangula

with two

menities and

t areas are s

4

CATION AND

ated informa

on and Zonin

ddison Road, M

prox. 5km sou), commercialIllawarra Road

ctares (1493.3astern corner G

ancis Walsh

P 527129

Survey Marksof Addison RRoad and She

le Municipal C

d

Use (Marrick

ar shaped b

rectangula

d an enclose

shown in Fi

D PHYSICAL

ation are pre

ng

Descr

Marrickville N

uth west of Syl building (soud (north-west)

3m2, from httpGDA Lat:-33.

s (SSM) occuRoad and Illawepherd Street.

Council

kville Draft Lo

block which

ar shaped a

ed room for

igure 2.

L SETTING

esented in T

ription

NSW

ydney CBD anuth-east), low)

p://maps.six.ns902838575, L

ur around the warra Road, an (http://maps.

ocal Environm

h was foun

awnings an

r the electric

Table 3-1 w

nd bound by Aw density resid

sw.gov.au) Long: 151.163

sites, being Pnd SS49215 osix.nsw.gov.a

ment Plan, 201

nd to be oc

nd small sq

cal switch b

while the sit

Addison Roaddential (south

3584185

PM587850 onon the Cornerau)

1)

ccupied by

quare shape

board. A sit

te

d h

r

a

ed

te


3.2 L

The site

Table 3-

Table 3-

DirecRelative

North

South

North

South

3.3 R

The toposummari

Table 3-

At

Topogra

Site Dra

Regiona

Soil Lan


LOCAL LAN

is situated

-2.

-2: Loca

ction e to Site

h-East Ad

-West Lo

h-West Illa

-West Co

REGIONAL S

ographical, ised in Tab

-3: Topo

ttribute

aphy

ainage

al Geology

ndscapes


ND USE

d within a m

al Land Use

ddison Road, t

ow density res

awarra Road t

ommercial (ca

SETTINGS

geological,ble 3-3.

ographical,

The site s

The generAlexandridrainage t

The site iof black tSydney)

The Soil CChapman Blacktownundulatingoccasionaupper slopvalley flatThe domiextracted moderate

NSW

mixed land u

e

then commerc

idential

then mixed co

afé)

, soil landsc

Geological

lopes gently t

ral slope of thia Canal, withto various stor

s likely undero dark grey sh

Conservation and Murphy,

n (bt). Accordg rises with lo

ally up to 10%pes grading ints. Rock outcrnant land usesfrom localisedsheet and gul

5

uses area w

Land Use

cial (retail)

ommercial (gr

cape and hy

and Hydro

to the south, so

he site to the h all stormwatrmwater easem

rlain by Triashale and lami

Service of NS 1989), indica

rding to Chapmocal relief betw

%. Crests and rnto concave lorop is absent.s are urban red deeply weatlly erosion hav

with surroun

e Description

ocery store) a

ydrogeolog

geological I

Descriptio

outh east.

south, south ter present at ments and the

ssic Age Shaleinite. (Ref. 1:1

SW Soil Landated that the siman and Murpween 10-30m.ridges are broaower slopes an

sidential and lthered locationve occurred in

nding land u

n

and residential

ical inform

Information

n

east in the dirthe site flowinmunicipal sto

e of the Wian100 000 Geolo

scapes of the ite overlies a Rphy, this lands. Slopes are gad (200-600mnd broad drain

light industry.ns where subs

n the past in so

uses being

l

mation for th

n

rection of Cong towards thormwater syst

namatta Grouplogical Series

Sydney 1:100Residual Landscape type incgenerally <5%

m) and roundernage depressio

. Clay has oftsoils are graveome locations

described i

he locality i

ook River andhis feature viatem.

p, comprisingSheet 9130 –

0,000 Sheet dscape – cludes gently

% but r with convex ons and

ten been ely. Minor to .

in

is

d

–


At

Botany BSulfate SMap (1:Murphy,

MarrickEnvironAcid SulClass Mscale; DrEnvironm2011, AS

Typical Soil Typ

Depth toGroundw

Groundw

Nearest

3.4 G

An onlin

the NSW

registere

Table 3

attached


ttribute

Bay Acid Soil Risk 25,000 scale; 1997)

kville Local nmental Plan lfate Risk

Map (1:1,000 raft Local mental Plan SS_003)

Vadose Zonepes

o water

water Types

Water Body

GROUNDWA

ne search of

W Natural R

ed bores wi

-4. A bore

d in Append


Soils are sSoils on cSoils and drainage. fertility.

Subject lacases, acidactivities

The Marrindicates required pground elis likely to

e Silty Clay

Seepage wstanding wsuggested

The grounsilty clay

The neareapproximconsideremarine fea

ATER BORE

f registered

Resource At

thin about

location pl

dix A.

NSW

shallow to mocrests, upper slsoloths on low Limitations i

and lies withind sulfate soilsare not likely

rickville Locathat the site

prior to commevation of belo be lowered b

y

was encounterwater level bed to flow towa

ndwater includstrata.

est water bodieately 2km med to be the neature, which f

RECORDS A

groundwate

las database

1 km of the

an as well

6

oderately deeplopes and welwer slopes andinclude moder

n the map class (ASS) are no

to be affected

al Environmenlies within a

mencing any wlow 5m Austrbelow 1m AH

red during drileing 0.652 to 1ards either the

des intermitten

es are Alexaneters (m) southarest receivinflows east to t

AND LOCAL

er bores wa

e (Ref. http:

e site. A su

as detailed

Descriptio

p (<150cm) Rell-drained aread in drainage rately reactive

ss description ot known or exd by ASS mate

ntal Plan 201a Class 5 ASworks within alian Height D

HD on adjacen

lling at 6.5 m 1.232 m BGL,Cooks River

nt seepage zon

dria Canal andh-east and soug water body he Botany Ba

L GROUNDW

as conducted

://www.nrat

ummary of a

informatio

n

ed Podzolic Sas. Deep (150depressions an

e, highly plasti

of No Knownxpected to occerials”.

11- Acid SulfSS area. Cou500m of ClasDatum (AHD)nt Class 1, 2, 3

below ground, which based or Alexandria

nes is present

d the Cooks Ruth of the site rfor the site, an

ay.

WATER USE

d by EI on 3

tlas.nsw.gov

all registere

n regarding

oils and Brow0-300cm) Yelland localised atic subsoils an

n Occurrence. cur and “land

fate Soils Risuncil consentss 1, 2, 3 or 4) and where th3 or 4 land.

d level (BGL)on local topo

a Canal.

t in groundwat

River which arrespectively, wnd is consider

E

30th April 2

v.au). Ther

ed bores is

g the identi

wn Podzolic low Podzolic areas of poor nd low soil

In such management

sk Class Mapt is therefore4 land, with ahe water table

, with the ography is

ter within the

re located which is red to be a

2014 throug

re were thre

presented i

fied bores i

a

gh

ee

in

is


Table 3-

Notes NA = Info

All of th

bore dep

indicated

Bore No

GW11168

GW11168

GW11169


-4: Sum

ormation not ava

he registered

pths ranged

d by recorde

o. DateDrille

87 12-01-2

87 12-01-2

92 12-01-2


mmary of reg

ailable, * SWL

d bores are

d between

ed standing

e ed

DriDept

2012 4.

2012 3

2012 1

NSW

gistered Gro

L = Standing W

indicated to

1.3m and 4

g water level

illed th (m)

SW

45

.5

.3

7

oundwater B

Water Level, #S

o have been

4.45m below

ls, SWL) be

WL(mBGL)*Salinity#

2.5 / -

1.55 / -

0.5 / -

Bores within

Salinity Units -

n authorised

w ground l

eing betwee

*/

n 1 km of th

not recorded,

d for monito

level (BGL

en 0.5m and

BoA

MONIT

MONIT

MONIT

he site.

oring bores

L), with wa

d 2.5m BGL

ore Purpose Authorised /

Intended

TORING BO

TORING BO

TORING BO

. The drille

ater table (a

L.

ORE

ORE

ORE

ed

as


4.0 S

4.1 S

A histori

relevant

previous

historica

1.

The histo

1

1

1

1L

1

1

2


SITE CONT

SITE LAND T

ical land tit

documents

s and curre

al aerial pho

orical aerial

1930: Febru

1943: Sydne

1951: May

1970: Run Lands NSW

1982 : Octo

1994: Octob

2004: Octob


TAMINAT

TITLES INF

tles search w

s resulting fr

ent registere

otographs w

l photograp

uary 1930, R

ey 1943 Ima

1951, Run 1

90 Map 19W 3241

ber 1982, R

ber 1994, Ru

ber 2004, Ru

NSW

TION APPR

FORMATION

was conduct

from this sea

ed proprieto

which indica

phs reviewed

Run 17, Map

agery (sour

15, Map 467

909-5010 B

Run 24, Map

un 11, Map

un 7, Map 1

8

RAISAL

N / HISTORIC

ted through

arch are pre

ors along w

ates the site

d as part of

p 3428 B/W

rce : http://m

7 –26 B/W

B/W, Lands

p 3241-113

p 153-164 -

14-25 - Dep

C AERIAL R

h Service Fir

esented in A

with inform

’s potential

this ESA in

W - Common

maps.six.nsw

- Lands Pho

photo, Syd

- Departm

Department

partment of

REVIEW

rst Registra

Appendix B

mation obtain

land uses i

ncluded:

nwealth Au

w.gov.au/)

oto

dney 1909

ent of Land

t of Lands N

Lands NSW

ation Pty Ltd

B. A summa

ined from t

is presented

ustralia Crow

series - De

ds NSW

NSW

W

d. Copies o

ary of all th

the availabl

d in Table 4

wn

epartment o

of

he

le

4-

of

A

As

02.0(1805.(19

2.02(19

16.(19

18.0(19

20.0(19


Table 4-

Marrickv

Date of Acquisition

regards the pa

01.1882 82 to 1906) 12.1906 06 to 1907)

2.1907 07 to 1986)

12.1986 86 to 1995)

01.1995 95 to 1995)

09.1995 95 to date)

Leases:

19.04

(See

20.07

11.02

As regar

The earl


-1-1: Sum

ville

Registere

art numbered (

William Mee

James Alexan(Transmissio

The New SoCompany LiThen Peters (PropNow Property Ho

Dairy FarmeNow Australian C

Carlovers Ca

# John Fran

-

4.1996 to C

lease dated

7.2012 to C

2.2013 Tran

rds the par

ly title to thi


mmary of O

ed Proprietorwhere ava

(1) on the attac

ek (Land Owne

nder Meek (Aron Application

outh Wales Freimited

perty Holdings)

oldings Pty Lim

ers Co-Operati

Co-Operative F

arwash (Aust)

ncis Walsh

Carlovers Ca

d 20.07.2012

Carlovers Ca

nsferred to B

rt highlight

is parcel wa

NSW

Owners –

r(s) & Occupaailable

ched cadastre

er)

rchitect)n not investigat

esh Food and I

) Pty Limited

mited

ive Limited

Foods Limited

Pty Limited

arwash (Au

2)

arwash (Au

Bet The Far

ted yellow a

as found to f

9

Lots 1 in

ations R

(Appendix B)

ted)

Ice

19foalosothsu19un19un19prwilocwhth19un 19un 20reddeshocthsit

ust) Pty Lim

ust) Pty Lim

rm Pty Lim

and numbe

form part o

n D.P. 527

Review of His

930 – The site our rectangularong the northe

outhern boundat the rest of t

urface. 942 – The site nchanged since950 - The site anchanged since970 – The site revious buildinith one larger rcated on the sohat appears to e northern hal

982 - The site anchanged since

994 – The site nchanged since

004 – The appedeveloped. Themolished and haped metal awccupying the soe other occupyte.

mited – expir

mited – expir

mited

ered (2) on

f a road pro

7129 – 11

storical Aeria

appeared to bebuildings loca

ern, western, earies respectivthe site consist

appeared to hae the 1930 phoappeared to hae the 1942 phohad been rede

ngs demolishedrectangular shaouthern half obe a sealed su

lf of the site. appeared to hae the 1970 pho

appeared to hae the 1982 pho

eared to have bhe previous bui

replaced with wnings or buildouthern sectionying the centra

res 29.08.20

res 29.08.20

the attache

ovided for in

10-112 Add

al Photograph

e occupied by ated along the eastern and vely. It appearsted of a grass

ave remained otograph. ave remained otograph. eveloped with d and replacedaped building

of the site withurface occupyin

ave remained otograph.

ave remained otograph.

been uilding was h two rectanguldings, with oneon of the site anal section of th

007, also 10

017, also 10

ed cadastre

n D.P. 718,

dison Road

hs Poten

Land

Unknow

Unknow

s

all

h ng

Commer

lar e nd he

Commer

Commer

0 year optio

0 year option

e

circa 1881

d,

ntial Uses

wn

wn

rcial

rcial

rcial

on

n


We are a

Date of Aand term 26.09.1881(1881 to 11881

18.12.1894(1894 to 1

20.12.1963

07.10.1966

06.04.1967(1967 to 1

Land titl

T

s

th

p

4.2 S

The site

photogra

informat

Table 4-


aware of the

Acquisition held

1 963)

4 963)

3

6

7 986)

le and histor

The site was

several ice c

he current o

present day.

SURROUNDI

e history r

aphs source

tion identifi

-2.


e following

Registered available

Robert Barc

D.P. 718 – pWilliam Barc(Official AssWallace) Resumed anMarrickville Street

Road closedGracious Ma

Property Ho

rical aerial

s have pred

cream and f

owner Mr F

ING LANDS

review incl

ed from NS

ied at surrou

NSW

events: -

Proprietor(s)

lay Wallace (G

providing for tclay Palmersignee of the E

nd vested in Cofor the purpo

and upon cloajesty Queen E

oldings Pty Lim

photograph

ominately b

food compa

Francis Wals

HISTORICA

uded a sea

SW Land a

unding land

10

) & Occupati

Gentleman)

this land as Ha

Estate of Robe

ouncil of the Mses of extendin

sing vested in Elizabeth the S

mited

hs indicate:

been used a

anies from

sh, who had

AL AERIAL P

arch of su

and Propert

d parcels fro

ons where

andley Street

ert Barclay

Municipality ofng Handley

Her Most Second

and owned f

1907 to 199

d leased the

PHOTOGRA

urrounding

ty Informat

om the revi

Referenand sal

Vol 546

Vol 546

f Gazette

Vol 546Now Crown L(Vide G4238) Vol 105Now Vol 107

for commerc

95. In 1995

property to

APHY REVIE

land uses

tion. A sum

ewed photo

nce to Title ale

6 Fol 65

6 Fol 65

e 20.12.1963 F

6 Fol 65

Land Gazette 07.10.1

526 Fol 44

738 Fol 38

cial purpose

the site wa

o Carlovers

EW

using hist

mmary of t

ographs are

at Acquisition

olio 3797

1966 Folio

es, includin

as bought b

Carwash ti

orical aeria

the pertinen

presented i

n

ng

by

ll

al

nt

in


Table 4-

Aerial Ph

February

Run 17, M

CommonwCrown

1943

Sydney 19

http://map

May 1951

Run 15, M

Lands Pho

October 1

Run 90 M

Lands phoseries

Departmen3241

October 1

Run 24, M

Departmen

October 1

Run 11, M

Departmen

2004

Run 7, Ma

Departmen


-2: Sum

hotograph

y 1930

Map 3428 B/W

wealth Austra

943 Imagery

ps.six.nsw.gov

1

Map 467 –26 B

oto

1970

Map 1909-5010

oto, Sydney 19

nt of Lands N

1982

Map 3241-113

nt of Lands N

1994

Map 153-164 –

nt of Lands N

ap 14-25 –

nt of Lands N


mmary of Su

Sur

W –

lia

Nor

Sou

Sou

Nor

v.au/

Sur

B/W –

Surima

0 B/W,

909

NSW

Surima

Sou(com

-

NSW

Surprev

–

NSW

Surprev

NSW

Surima

NSW

urrounding L

rrounding

rth-East – Add

uth-West – Re

uth-East – Res

rth-West – Illa

rrounding land

rrounding lanage.

rrounding landage with the ex

uth-East – Premmercial).

rrounding landvious aerial.

rrounding landvious aerial.

rrounding landage.

11

Land Aerial

dison Road th

esidential

sidential

awarra Road t

d remained rel

nd appeared

d appeared relxception of:

evious residen

d use appears

d use appears

d appeared rel

l Photograph

hen commercia

then residentia

latively uncha

relatively un

latively uncha

ntial building r

remain relativ

remain relativ

latively uncha

h Review

al (warehouse

al

anged.

nchanged from

anged from the

replaced with

vely unchange

vely unchange

anged from the

e)

m the previo

e previous

a larger build

ed from the

ed from the

e previous

ous

ding


4.3 C

The sear

initiated

The sear

Should t

past site

separate

4.4 W

A search

behalf o

Section

Database

no recor

4.5 H

On 30th

conducte

the NSW

Manage

and to su

4.6 S

Mr Emm

inspectio

Th

va

bu

tot

(so

Th

sit


COUNCIL IN

rch of site h

d on the 25th

rch was still

the inspecti

e activities,

cover.

WORKCOVE

h of WorkC

f the client.

received by

e (SCID) an

rds pertainin

HAZARDOU

April, 2014

ed, this bein

W OEH has

ment Act 1

urrounding

SITE WALK

manuel Woe

on of the sit

he site is a s

acated car w

uilding prev

tal area of

outh-east), l

he site was n

te was used


NFORMATIO

history reco

March, 201

l in progres

ion of avail

then a for

ER NSW AU

Cover NSW

. Correspon

y EI (Appe

nd the micr

ng to the site

S CHEMICA

4, an on-lin

ng a databa

s no involv

997 for the

proporties w

KOVER INSPE

elders (EI, E

te on 11th A

slightly skew

washing faci

iously used

site is 1,49

low density

not in opera

as a carwas

NSW

ON

ords held by

14.

ss and had n

lable Counc

rmal writte

UTHORITY

W Authority

ndence dated

endix C), co

ofiche reco

e were held

ALS AND RE

ne search of

ase that is m

ements or r

e NSW prop

within a 500

ECTION

Environmen

April 2014, w

wed rectang

ility, with tw

d as toilets a

93.3m2, bou

residential

ation at the

sh business.

12

y Marrickvi

not produce

cil records

en notificati

SEARCH

y records re

d 27th Marc

onfirmed th

ords held by

d.

EGULATORY

f the Conta

maintained b

regulations

perty identi

0m radius.

ntal Scientis

with a summ

gular shape

wo rectangu

and an enclo

und by Add

(south wes

time of the

.

ille Municip

d any result

suggest the

ion to this

lating to th

ch, 2014 fro

hat a search

y WorkCove

Y COMPLIAN

aminated La

by the NSW

under Sect

ified as 110

st) made the

mary of the

ed block wh

ular shaped

osed room f

dison Road

t), and Illaw

e site visit, h

pal Council

ts at the tim

e potential f

effect will

he site was

m the Dang

h of Stored

er was cond

NCE

and – Reco

W OEH. Thi

tion 58 of t

0-112 Addi

e following o

findings pro

hich was fou

d awnings a

for the elect

(north-east

warra Road

however it w

l related to

me of report

for contami

l be submit

requested o

gerous Good

d Chemical

ducted and r

ord of EPA

is search co

the Contam

ison Road,

observation

ovided belo

und to be oc

and small sq

trical switch

t), commerc

(north-west

was unders

the site wa

preparation

ination from

tted under

on by EI, o

ds Licensin

Informatio

revealed tha

Notices wa

onfirmed tha

minated Lan

Marrickvill

ns during an

ow:

ccupied by

quare shape

h board. Th

cial buildin

t).

tood that th

as

n.

m

a

on

ng

on

at

as

at

nd

le

n

a

ed

he

ng

he


Th

the

wa

Mu

wa

No

wa

Th

on

Ov

sou


he majority

e north-east

as in relativ

ultiple drain

aste water fr

o chemical

ashing subst

here were n

n the site,

verall the si

uth-east.


of the site

tern, south-e

ely good co

ns were obs

from the car

storage was

tances obse

no visible in

ite topograp

NSW

is concrete

eastern and

ondition wit

served throu

wash zones

s observed w

erved on the

ndicators of

phy was rel

13

e sealed wit

north-west

th minimal c

ughout site,

s.

with the exc

e south-west

f undergroun

latively gen

th the excep

ern boundar

cracking an

which are d

ception of c

tern corner

nd storage t

nerally flat,

ption of gar

ries. The co

nd staining o

designed to

car washing

of the site.

tank or abo

with a slig

rden beds lo

oncrete seal

observed.

capture and

g detergent a

oveground s

ght decline t

ocated alon

ed hardston

d recycle th

and other ca

storage tank

to the south

ng

ne

he

ar

ks

h,


5.0 P

In accor

Measure

2013), a

conceptu

of contam

The CSM

the relia

Each mi

provides

5.1 D

With ref

planned

I

lo

g

C

p

S

c

Soil and

risk pose


PRELIMIN

rdance with

e 1999 (Am

and to aid in

ual site mod

mination ca

M provides

ability and u

igration and

s a qualitativ

DATA GAPS

ference to th

to include t

nstallation

ocated acr

groundwater

Conducting

prior to leav

Soil sampl

concentratio

d groundwa

ed by expos


NARY CON

h the Natio

mendment 2

n the assess

del (CSM) w

an migrate a

a framewo

useability of

d exposure p

ve opinion o

S

he current C

the followin

of dedicate

oss the sit

r flow direc

a single gr

ving the site

ing from

ons with res

ater samplin

sure pathwa

NSW

NCEPTUA

nal Environ

2013) Sched

sment of dat

with an asse

along a give

ork to allow

f the data c

pathway is

of the poten

CSM and th

ng data sear

ed, groundw

te in a tr

ction;

roundwater

; and

various lo

pect to the p

ng across th

ays as identi

14

AL SITE M

nmental Pr

dule B2 –

ata collectio

essment of

en pathway

w for the rev

collected, an

summarise

ntial risk of

he identifie

rches and fie

water monit

riangular p

monitoring

ocations ac

proposed la

he site shall

ified in Tab

ODEL

rotection (A

Guideline

n for the si

plausible p

and have an

view of any

nd to identif

d in Table

each compl

ed data gaps

eld investig

toring bore

attern to a

g event (GM

cross the

and use.

l allow for

ble 5-1.

Assessment

on Site Ch

te, EI has d

ollutant link

n effect on a

y informatio

fy any gaps

5-1 along w

lete exposur

s described

gations:

s, screening

assist with

ME) to asse

site to as

the determ

of Site Con

haracterisat

developed a

kages wher

a particular

on collected

s in field in

with an ass

re pathway

below, the

g the local

the deter

ess groundw

ssess the

mination of t

ntamination

tion (NEPM

a preliminar

eby a sourc

receptor.

d to ascertai

nvestigations

essment tha

.

works wer

aquifer an

rmination o

water qualit

contaminan

the potentia

n)

M

ry

ce

in

s.

at

re

nd

of

ty

nt

al

E1R

T

E

E

Environmental Site A110-112 Addison RoReport No. E22157 A

Table 5-1: Pr

Site S

Entire Site Siteharalluto a0.5msee6.5m

Entire Site Siteharalluto a0.5msee6.5m

Assessment oad, Marrickville NAA 2nd May 2014

reliminary Conc

Subsurface Profi

e covered with concrdstand, underlain uvial soils, with fillia maximum depth om with groundwatepage encountered am BGL.

e covered with concrdstand, underlain uvial soils, with fillia maximum depth om with groundwatepage encountered am BGL.

NSW

ceptual Site Mod

ile PotentiSource

crete

ing of er at

Commerciaactivities, lepaint, termiticidesbuilding materials anstorage of tywith potentiuncontrolledfilling (for levelling purposes)

crete

ing of er at

Vehicle cleaand general maintenance

del

ial es

PotenContam

al ead

s,

nd the yres ial d

Pesticidesmetals, pehydrocarb(includingOCP, OPPand asbest

aning

e.

Heavy mepetroleum Hydrocarb(including

15

ntial minants

M

, heavy troleum ons

g PAHs), P, PCBs tos.

Buildin Soils Ground Air/Soi LNAPL(if prese

etals, m bons g PAHs).

Soils/B Ground Air/Soi

edia SeRe

ng Fabric

dwater

l Vapour

L/DNAPL ent)

CooksRiver/ACanal Site Wduring and con Future residen

edrock

dwater

l Vapour

Mill PoAlexan Site Wduring and con Future residen

ensitive eceptor

MiEP

Alexandria

Workers demolition nstruction

site nts

Seepsubsbedrgrou Derm Inge Inha

ond / ndria Canal

Workers demolition nstruction

site nts

Seepsubsbedrgrou Derm Inge Inha

igration & Exposure Pathways page into the surface soils, rock and undwater.

mal Contact

estion

alation

Mofur MocontheLow

page into the surface soils, rock and undwater.

mal Contact

estion

alation

Mofur MocontheLow

Potential RiskComplete Expo

Pathway oderate to Low (to brther assessed)

oderate to High (shontamination be presen w (post developmen

oderate to Low (to brther assessed)

oderate to High (shontamination be presen w (post developmen

k of sure

be

ould sent)

nt)

be

ould sent)

nt)


6.0 S

In accor

Objectiv

quality n

applied f

Table 6-

State the ProFor future reto soil land potential ons

Identify the Former land commercial decisions ba

Is site so Do site

purpose

Identify InpThe primary Soil sam Groundw Laborato Observa Assessm

Section Assessm

- Rel- Rel

Define the SThe spatial b Lateral Vertical Tempora

used forcomprom

Develop a DLaboratory t All con All lab

quality QA/QC Labora

Specify LimiSpecific limiquality and available site A decisi

given si(95% Udecision

A decisconfidenhotspot

ental Site AssAddison Road,o. E22157 AA

SAMPLING

rdance with

ves (DQO) w

needed for

for this asse

-1: Data

oblem (Step 1) edevelopment puruses and comme

site and offsite re

Decisions (Step 2 uses indicated thuses. To assessed on the follow

oil and groundwasoils or groundws, or to prevent o

uts to the Decisioy inputs to the assmpling at seven (7water sampling frory Analytical reations made durinment of the suitab

6 2 and describement of analyticalevant soil investievant groundwat

Study Boundariesboundaries of the - the geographica

l - from the existial - the findings r commercial/resmise onsite envir

Decision Rule (Stetest results will bentracted laboratorboratory analyticay control (QA/QCC results demonstatory practical qu

its of Decision Eits for this projecstandard procedue data collected. ion can be madeite criteria. This

UCL) on the avern error will be 5%sion can be madnce using a selecmay not be detec


G, ANALY

internation

was used b

the specifi

essment is d

a Quality Ob

rposes the site neercial land uses. ceptors, in accord

2) hat the site was suss the environmewing questions:

ater quality suitabwater require furoff-site migration

on (Step 3) essment of soil an7) locations distrifrom three (3) newsults for represen

ng the sampling pbility of the datad in more detail il results against: igation levels (SILer investigation l

s (Step 4) assessment were

al boundary of thng ground level tof this assessmensidential uses anronmental conditi

ep 5) e accepted if: ries are accreditedal data is generallC) policies and DQtrate acceptable rantitation limits (

Errors (Step 6) ct are in accordanures for field samThis should inclu

e based on a probfollows the guidrage site concen

% that a conclusivde based on the cted density of sycted.

NSW 4

YTICAL AN

nal environm

y the EI ass

fic data req

documented

bjectives

Data Q

eeds to be made s The ESA is the

dance with NSW

ubject to contamiental condition o

ble for the intenderther remediationof contaminants?

nd groundwater wbuted in a triangu

wly installed grountative soil and grprogram, which ma obtained from sin Appendix B; a

Ls) (Table 6-4 ), evels (GILs) (Ta

e limited as followe assessment wasto the proposed dnt will hold true

nd there are no ons.

d by NATA for thly within pre-deteQOs, as detailed ireliability and rep(PQL) are below

nce with the apprmpling and handude the followingbability that 95%ance given in NStration for each

ve statement may probability that ystematic data po

16

ND QUALI

mental stand

sessment te

quirements

d in Table 6

Quality Object

suitable for potenherefore required

W EPA guidelines.

ination associatedof the site for the

ed land use? n or treatment an?

will be: ular grid pattern aundwater wells toroundwater samp

may influence the sampling and anand

for soils to remaable 6-5) for the a

ws: s defined by the s

depth of groundwafor as long as thactivities taking

he analyses underermined data accin Appendix B.

presentativeness othe adopted acce

ropriate guidancedling. This step g points to quanti

% of the data, whiSW EPA (1994) respective contabe incorrect. a contamination

oints. The decisio

ITY PLAN

dards, the p

eam to deter

of the proj

6-1.

tives (DQOs)

ntial future redeveto assess risks p

d with the previoue proposed resid

nd special manag

across the site; o assess groundwales for relevant chneed for further a

nalysis against da

ain on the site; andassessment of gro

site boundary, as iater; and

he site use remainplace onsite or

rtaken; ceptance criteria,

of the data set. ptance/assessmen

e made or endorsealso examines th

fy tolerable limitsich is collected ufor site validatio

aminant being be

hotspot of a ceon error will be

N (SAQP)

process of d

rmine the a

ect. The D

elopment into mixposed by contam

us activities, includential uses, the

ement before the

ater conditions unhemicals of potenassessment;

ata quality indica

d undwater quality

illustrated in Figu

ns passive in natuon the immedia

in accordance wi

nt criteria for the

ed by the NSW Ohe certainty of cs: using a systemation contingent upoelow the relevant

ertain circular dialimited to a prob

developing D

appropriate

DQO proce

xed residential wminated soils and/

uding potential imEI team would

e site can be use

nderlying the sitential concern;

ators (DQIs), wh

y.

ure 2;

ure; that is, for asately adjacent pr

ith laboratory qua

tested COPC, wh

OEH, appropriateconclusive statem

ic sampling patteon the upper 95%t criteria. Theref

ameter will be dbability of 5% th

Data Qualit

level of dat

ess that wa

with minimal acce/or groundwater

mported filling anmake the require

ed for the intende

;

ich are outlined

s long as the site roperties that ma

ality assurance an

herever possible.

e indicators of daments based on th

ern, will satisfy th% confidence limfore a limit on th

detected with 95hat a contaminatio

ty

ta

as

ess to

nd ed

ed

in

is ay

nd

ata he

he mit he

% on


Optimise theThis step is procedures th Soil sam Samplin The use

6.1 D

To ensur

procedur

indicator

details o

Table 6-

Ite

EnvironmeConsultant

Sample hanStorage

Transport

Volatile los

QA sample

Laboratory


e Design for Obtaintended to defi

hat were implemmpling from the wng from predefine

of established gr

DATA QUAL

re the data c

res were ad

rs (DQI) rel

of the assess

-2: Data

em

ental T9

ndling and Ws

Sil

O

sses Ot

es F

Fcc

y analyses TNw


aining Data (Stepfine the data collented to optimise

walls and base of ed, monitoring boroundwater monit

LITY INDICA

collected as

dopted, as pr

lating to bot

sment presen

a Quality As

The Environme9001:2000. Wo

Work should bestandard practic

Australian potentially

Australian

NSW EPANew South

National E2013, Nati

Samples would integrity of the laboratories und

One trip blank p

One spiked samthan 10 percent

Field and labora

intra-labor

inter-labor

Field and Laborcompliance is toconservatively a

The selected labNATA registerewould use appro

NSW 4

Data Q

p 7) lection design, we data collection fthe tank farm exc

ore locations to astoring procedures

ATORS

s part of the

resented in T

th field and

nted in Tab

ssurance Pro

ntal Consultantrk would be un

e undertaken gece and in accord

Standard AS44y contaminated

/ New Zealand

A (March 2004) h Wales; and

Environment Proonal Environm

be stored in ansamples from cder “chain of cu

per sample batc

mple should be ain the trip spik

atory QA sampl

atory duplicate

atory duplicate

ratory acceptabo be documenteadopted.

boratories wouled for the analyopriate detectio

17

Quality Object

which will generafor achieving the cavation; ssess groundwates consistent with

ESA was o

Table 6-2 b

d laboratory

ble 6-3 belo

ocedures

t should maintandertaken by app

eneral in accorddance with:

482.1 (2005) Gsoil – Part 1: N

d Standard AS/N

Approved Met

otection (Assesment Protection C

n ice brick-coolecollection to recustody” (CoC) d

ch sent to labora

analysed per bake.

les will be anal

e samples at a ra

e samples at a ra

le limits are beted in the report

ld comply with ysis to be underton limits for the

tives (DQOs)

ate data to efficiDQOs included t

er conditions at thenvironmental st

of quality, th

below. An a

procedures

w.

Objectives

ain Quality Assupropriately qua

dance with field

uide to the inveNon-volatile and

NZS 5667.11 (1

thods for the sam

ssment of Site CCouncil, May 2

ed esky and tranceipt by the anadescribing samp

atory. Results fo

atch for soils an

lysed as follows

ate of 1 in 10 pr

ate of 1 in 20 pr

tween 30–50% and sample to b

the respective Itaken and perfo

e analyses to be

ently and effectithe following:

he site; and andards.

he following

assessment o

s shall be ca

urance Systemsalified and expe

d procedures ba

estigation and sad semi-volatile c

1998) Guidance

mpling and ana

Contamination) 2013.

nsported to the lytical laboratople preservation

for trip blanks sh

d groundwater.

s:

rimary samples

rimary samples.

RPD as stated be re-analysed

ISO 9001 qualiorm their own in

undertaken.

ively satisfy the

g data quali

of the data q

arried out, w

s certified to ASerienced personn

ased on industry

sampling of sitecompounds;

e on sampling o

alysis of water p

Measure 1999

laboratory. To ory, samples wiln and transport

hould all be non

. Volatile losses

.

by AS 4482.1–or higher level

ity assurance prnternal QA/QC

DQOs. Samplin

ity assuranc

quality

with the

S/NZS ISO nel.

y accepted

es with

of groundwater;

pollutants in

– Amendment

ensure the ll be sent to theduration.

n-detected.

s should be less

–2005. Non-to be

rograms, be C programs, and

ng

ce

;

e

s

d


Ite

LaboratoryControl – Dspikes, blansurrogates –Acceptable

Table 6-

Q

Precision -of the variaof data

Accuracy -of the closethe “true” v

Representaconfidence that data armedium pr

Completenamount of ucollection a

Comparab(expressed may be confor each samevent.


em

y Quality Duplicates, nks and –

e Limits

P

-3: Data

A/QC Measur

- A quantitativeability (or repro

- A quantitativeeness of reportevalue

ativeness - The (expressed qua

re representativeesent on Site

ness - A measuruseable data froactivity

bility - The conqualitatively) t

nsidered to be empling and ana


Primary laborat

surrogates:

matrix spik

control sam

duplicate s

method bla

a Quality In

res

e measure oducibility)

Pd

Tb

R

R

H

e measure ed data to

M

M

L

e alitatively) e of each

Tt

Bu

Rti

Ttit

re of the om a data

Ip

Wt

C

Id

nfidence that data equivalent alytical

GeSs

Il

NSW 4

tory QA/QC acc

: 70% to 130%

kes: 70% to 130

mples: 70% to 1

samples: <4PQL

anks: zero to <P

dicators (N

Performance of differences (RP

The RPDs will bbe considered w

Results are less

Results are less

Heterogeneous

Method blanks,

Matrix spike an

Laboratory cont

To ensure the dahe field, the fol

Blank samples wunacceptable in

Review of relatio provide an innstances of sign

The appropriateechniques will nterference or dransport metho

In validating theprogram the fol

Whether standao; and

Copies of all CO

It can therefore data collection a

Given that a reepisodes, issueStandard Operastandards on eac

In addition the daboratory meth

18

ceptance limits

recovery

0% recovery fo

130% recovery

L - +/- 2PQL, 4

PQL.

SW DEC, 2

f blind field dupPD); and

be assessed as awhere:

than 10 times t

than 20 times t

materials or vo

which are anal

nd matrix spike

trol samples.

ata produced byllowing steps ar

will be run in pnstances of labo

ive percentage ndication that thnificant sample

eness of collectibe assessed to degradation (i.e

ods).

e degree of comlowing is consi

ard operating pr

OC documentat

be considered wactivities is suff

reported data ss of comparab

ating Procedurech data gatherin

data will be colhodologies will

Objectives

are expected to

r organics or 80

for soil or 80%

4-10PQL – 0.-25

2005)

Data Qualit

plicate sample s

acceptable if le

the limits of rep

the LOR and th

olatile compoun

lysed for the an

duplicate samp

y the laboratoryre taken by the

parallel with fielratory artefacts

differences (RPhe samples are ge matrix heterog

ion methodologensure/confirm

e. volatile loss d

mpleteness of thidered:

rocedures (SOP

tion are reviewe

whether the profficient for the p

set can compribility between s (SOPs) and rng activity.

llected by experbe employed in

o be as follows:

0%-120% recov

% to 120% recov

5 or 50%RPD,

ty Indicators

ets, through cal

ss than 30%. RP

porting (LOR);

he RPD is less th

ds are encounte

nalytes targeted

ple sets; and

y is representatilaboratory:

ld samples to co;

PD) values for fgenerally homogeneities; and

gies, handling, sm there was miniduring transport

he analytical dat

s) for sampling

ed and presente

oportion of “usepurposes of the l

se several datadata sets are egulator-endors

rienced samplern all laboratory

:

very for inorgan

very for waters

>10PQL – 0-10

lculation of rela

RPDs that excee

han 50%; or

ered.

in the primary

ive of condition

onfirm there are

field and laboraogeneous, with n

storage and preimal opportunitt due to incorre

ta sets acquired

g protocols have

ed.

eable data” genland use assess

a sets from sereduced througsed or publishe

rs and NATA-atesting program

nics

0 or 30%RPD

ative percentage

d this range ma

samples;

ns encountered

e no

atory duplicatesno unacceptable

servation ty for sample

ect preservation

d during the

e been adhered

nerated in the sment.

eparate samplingh adherence

ed guidelines an

accredited ms.

e

ay

in

s e

/

ng to nd


6.2 A

6.2.1 S

The Soil

summari

SILs wit

Table Q

The Soilwere the

Noy

Na

N

NH


ADOPTED A

Soil Criteri

l Investigati

ised in Tab

th respect to

QC3.

l Investigate:

NEPM (20opportunitieyard space s

NEPM (201and F2, BTE

NEPM (201

NEPM (201HSLs).


ASSESSMENT

ia

ion Levels (

ble 6-4. An

o contamina

tion Levels

013) – Hees for soil asuch as high

13) – Soil HEX and Nap

3) – Manag

13) - Healt

NSW 4

T CRITERIA

(SILs) that

nalytical me

ant detectio

(SILs) that

ealth-Basedaccess; whih-rise build

Health Screphthalene);

gement Lim

th Screenin

19

A

would be u

ethods have

on limits and

at would be

d Investigaich includesdings and ap

eening Leve

its for TPH

ng Levels f

used as the a

e been selec

d these are p

used as th

ation Levels dwellings partments (H

els (HSLs) f

H fractions F

for asbestos

action level

cted to be r

presented in

he action lev

ls for resiwith fully a

HIL-B);

for vapour

F1 – F4; and

s contamina

ls for the as

relevant for

n detail in A

vels for the

idential wiand perman

intrusion (f

d

ation in so

sessment ar

r the selecte

Appendix D

e assessmen

ith minimanently pave

for TPHs F

oil (Asbesto

re

ed

D,

nt

al ed

F1

os


Table 6-

Metals Arsenic - AsCadmium - Chromium(VCopper - CuLead - Pb Mercury - HNickel - Ni Zinc - Zn Petroleum H

F1*

F2**

F3 (>C16-C3

F4 (>C34-C4

Monocyclic

Benzene Toluene EthylbenzenXylenes (totPolycyclic ANaphthaleneBenzo(α)pyrCarcinogeniTotal PAHs Organochlo

DDT + DDD

Aldrin + DieChlordane Endosulfan Endrin Heptachlor HCB MethoxychlMirex Toxaphene OrganophosChloropyrifo

Other

Total PCBs

Asbestos

Notes SIL are NEPyard space s# - Petroleum(Assessment Schedule (B1* = To obtain** = To obta


-4: Sum

Paramet

s Cd VI) – Cr(VI) u

Hg

Hydrocarbons

34)

40)

c Aromatic Hy

ne tal) Aromatic Hyde rene ic PAHs 4 5

orine Pesticide

D + DDE

eldrin

lor

sphorus Pestifos

PM (2013) HIL Bsuch as high-rise m Hydrocarbon of Site Contamin

1). n F1 subtract the ain F2 subtract Na


mmary of Sit

ter

s#

ydrocarbons (

drocarbons (P

des (OCPs)

icides (OPPs)

B – Residential wbuildings and apContamination w

nation) Measure

sum of BTEX coaphthalene from

NSW 4

te Assessme

U

mgmgmgmgmgmgmgmg

mg

mg

mg

mg

(BTEX)

mgmgmgmg

PAHs) mgmg

Tmg

mg

mgmgmgmgmgmgmgmgmg

mg

mg

w

with minimal oppoartments unless i

will be assessed a1999 – Amendme

oncentrations fromthe >C10-C16 fract

20

ent Criteria

Unit PQ

g / kg 3g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 1g / kg 0.g / kg 0g / kg 0

g / kg 2

g / kg 2

g / kg 9

g / kg 12

g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0

g / kg 0g / kg 0TEQ 0g / kg 0

g / kg 0

g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0g / kg 0

g / kg 0

g / kg 1

w / w 0.0

ortunities for soiindicated otherwiaccording to the ent 2013 Guidelin

m the C6-C10 fraction.

for Soil Inv

QL

3 .3 .3 .5 1 01 .5 .5

25 45 (0

25 110 (0

90

20

.1

.1 160 (0

.1

.3 40 (

.1

.1

.2

.8

.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.2

1

001

l access; which iise. methodology de

nes i.e. NEPM (2

ction.

vestigation L

0 - <1m) 70 (1

0 - <1m) 240 (

0 - <1m) 220 (55

(0 - <1m) 60 (

ncludes dwelling

scribed in NEPC2013), and presen

Levels (SIL

SILs

5001 150 500

30,000 1,2002 1203 1,200

60,000

1m - <2m) 11

(1m - <2m) 4

2,5007

10,0007

0.56 (1m - <2m) 3

5 (0 - <1m)6 (1m - <2m) 9

36 - 4

4005

600

10 90

400 20 10 15

500 20 30

340

1

<0.001

gs with fully and p

C National Envirnted as a flowchar

Ls)

10 (2 to <4m)6

440 (2 to <4m

310 (2 to <4m

5 (2 to <4m)6

permanently pave

ronment Protectiort in Figure 1 of i

6

m)6

m)6

ed

on its


1 - Arsenic Sschedule B7)2 - Lead SILconsidered. S3 - Elemental4 - SIL is ba

B7 of NEP5 - Total PAapplication oreported in th6 – Value obclays and san7 – Value ob

6.2.2 G

Groundw

in Table

N

The gro

Cooks R

Analytic

to contam


SIL assumes 70%)

L is based on blooSite-specific bioal Mercury: SIL dsed on the 8 carcPM 2013)

AHs: HIL is basedof the total PAH he total PAHs sh

btained from NEPnd tained from NEP

Groundwat

water Invest

e 6-5 were:

NEPM (201

undwater w

River is co

cal methods

minant dete


% oral bioavailabi

od lead models (Iavailability may bdoes not address ecinogenic PAHs a

d on the sum of tSIL should consiould meet the B(a

PM 2013 Table 1

PM 2013Table 1 B

ter Criteria

tigation Lev

3) – Groun

within the s

onsidered to

s have been

ection limits

NSW 4

ility. Site specific

IEUBK for HILs be important and elemental mercuryand their TEFs (p

the 16 PAHs mosider the presencea)P TEQ SIL. NaA(3)Soil HSLs f

B(7) Managemen

a

vels (GILs)

dwater Inve

site is likel

o be a mar

selected to

s.

21

c bioavailability m

A, B and C and should be considy. A Site specificpotency related to

st commonly repe of carcinogenic apthalene reportedfor vapour intrusi

nt Limits for TPH

that would

estigation L

ly to flow i

rine feature

o be relevan

may be importan

adult lead modeldered where approc assessment shouo B(a)P adopted b

orted for contamPAHs and Napthd in the total PAHion, 0 to <1m in

H fractions F1 – F4

d be used for

Levels Table

into the Co

e, the Mari

nt for the se

t and should be c

l for HIL B whereopriate (refer scheuld be considered by CCME 2008 (

minated sites (Worhalene (the most H should meet thesand, considered

4 in soil for coars

r the investi

e 1C;

ooks River/

ne Water c

elected SILs

considered where

re 50% oral bioavedule B7)

d if elemental mer(Ref. Schedule

rld Health Organvolatile PAH). Ce relevant SIL.

d to be the most c

se grained soil te

igation and

/Alexandria

critera will

s and GILs

e appropriate (ref

vailability has bee

rcury is present.

nisation 1998). ThCarcinogenic PAH

conservative of si

xture

summarise

a Canal. Th

be applied

with respec

fer

en

he Hs

ilt,

ed

he

d.

ct


Table 6-

ANAL

Heavy MArsenic IArsenic VCadmium

ChromiuCopper Lead MercuryNickel Zinc PetroleuF1* F2** F3 (>C16

F4 (>C34

PAHs Total PAHNaphthal

Benzo(a)p Notes: NR = no cuGILs are N(2000) 95%* = To obta**= To obt# = PetrolEnvironmepresented a 1 = NEPMconsidered 2 = GIL crmost consegroundwateconsidered


-5: Sum

LYTE Un

Metals III gV gm g

um ggg

y ggg

um Hydrocagg

6-C34) g

4 – C40) g

Hs gene g

pyrene g

urrently availabNEPM (2013) G% Freshwater Train F1 subtract tain F2 subtractleum Hydrocar

ent Protection (Aas a flowchart in

M (2013) ANZEbio-accumulati

riteria is NEPMervative of saner, as groundw.


mmary of Sit

nits Fresh

g/L 2g/L 1g/L 0.0

g/LNR (A

1 (Asg/L 1g/L 3g/L 0.0g/L 1g/L

arbons# g/Lg/Lg/Lg/L

g/L Ng/L 1

g/L N

ble published crGroundwater Inrigger values, uthe sum of BTE

t Naphthalene frrbon ContaminAssessment of Sn Figure 1 of itsECC/ARMCANive metals

M (2013) Grounnd, silts and c

water is present

NSW 4

te Assessme

Waters MaWa

24 N13 N06 1 0s Cr III) Cr V1) .4

3.4 406 1 011 8

1,0002 1,0002 NR2 NR2

NR N16

NR N

iteria. vestigation Lev

unless otherwiseEX concentratiofrom the >C10-Cnation will be Site Contaminas Schedule

NZ (2000) 99%

dwater HSLs foclays. This vat above 2m. Sh

22

ent Criteria

Marine Waters

MAHsNR BenzeNR Tolue0.7 Ethyl

27 Total 1.3 VOCs4.4 Aniline0.1 2,4-dic7 3,4-dic

15 1,2- dic1,3- dic1,4- dic1,2,3- t1,2,4- t1,3,5- t

NR 70

NR

vels for Fresh/Me indicated ons from the C6

C16 fraction. assessed acco

ation) Measure

% Freshwater tri

for vapour intrualue has been hould contamin

for GILs

ANALYTE

ene ene

benzene

Xylenes

e chloroanilinechloroanilinechlorobenzenechlorobenzenechlorobenzenetrichlorobenzetrichlorobenzetrichlorobenze

Marine Waters

6-C10 fraction.

ording to the 1999 – Amendm

igger values are

usion, Table 1Aused as an innation be iden

Units

g/Lg/Lg/L

g/L

g/Lg/Lg/L

e g/Le g/Le g/Lene g/Lene g/Lene g/L

(Table 1C), bas

methodology dment 2013 Guid

e used for Cadm

A(4) in Sand 2mnterim measuretified, soil vap

Fresh Wa

8002 NR NR

350 (as o-xy200 (as p-xy

8 7 3

160 260 60 3

85 NR

ased on ANZEC

described in Ndelines i.e. NEP

mium and Merc

m to <4m, consiement, for the pour measurem

aters MariWate

500NRNR

ylene) ylene) NR

NRNR15NRNRNRNRNRNR

CC/ARMCANZ

NEPC NationalPM (2013), and

cury, which are

idered to be theassessment of

ments should be

ine ers

0 R R

R

R R

50 R R R R R R

Z

l d

e

e f e


7.0 A

7.1 S

The wor

Table 7-

Ac

Fieldwor

Bores DrDepth

Rational

Soil Logg

Sample c

Field scr

Laborato


ASSESSME

SOIL INVEST

rk objective

-1: Soil

ctivity/Item

rk Date

rilled and Targ

le

ging

collection

reening

ory analyses


ENT METH

TIGATION

s and scope

Sampling M

11th Ap

get A total

Five bocapabilBH1, B

In orderthe EPAas well approxi

Seven (systemawalls, u

Stratigrmonitor

Soil cla(USCS)Append

At the f

the

ne

an

whco

Sample

All draiIonisati

Based oanalysebe analy

M

To

Be

Po

OrBi

As

In additthis replaborato

NSW 4

HODOLOG

e of works f

Methodolog

pril, 2014 (Soil a

of seven (7) tes

oreholes were drities until natur

BH2 and BH5 to

r to comply witA (1995) Samplas the EPA (19

imately 7 test lo

(7) separate tesatic, triangular underground an

raphy and any oring wells (if an

assifications and) and Australiandix E.

following depth

e surface of the

ar the top of na

nd lower part of

here any changntamination oc

es will be collec

in outlets in soiion Detector (PI

on the availableed in the laboratysed for a range

etals all

otal Petroleum H

enzene/Toluene

olycyclic Aroma

rgano Chlorinephenyls (OCP/

sbestos all

tion to these priport. The remainory analysis be

23

GY

for the soil i

gy

assessment wor

st boreholes we

drilled with a uteral soils or drillo allow for the i

th the minimumling Design Gu994) Minimum Socations would

st boreholes (Bsampling patter

nd overhanging

other relevant inny) will be reco

d descriptions wn Standard (AS

hs:

e fill material (0

atural;

f natural; or

ges in lithologyccurs or elevated

cted from the au

il samples colleID), to assess if

e PID results antory. At this stae of potential c

lowance 2 samp

Hydrocarbons (

e/Ethyl benzene

atic Hydrocarbo

e Pesticides, O/OPP/PCB)

lowance 1 samp

imary samples,ning soil samplerequired.

investigation

Details

rks).

ere drilled:

e mounted drillrefusal was en

installation of g

m sampling densidelines for a siSoil Sampling Pbe required.

H1 – BH7) wern, with allowaservices and ot

nformation duriorded by approp

were based on US) 4482.1-1997.

0.2-0.3 m)

(i.e. ‘clean’ nad photo-ionisat

uger using dedi

ected during thef volatile contam

nd field observaage, it is anticipontaminants of

ples/hole

(TPH) 1.5

e/Xylene (BTEX

ons (PAH) 1.5

Organo Phospallowance 1

ple/hole

QAQC samplees collected wil

n are summ

rig, and fitted wcountered, to a

groundwater mo

sity requiremenite area of 0.14Protocol for imp

ere selected usiance for structurher physical ob

ing drilling and priately qualifie

Unified Soil Cla Geological bo

atural soils are ion detector (PI

cated sampling

works will be minants are pre

ations, selected ated that selecte

f concern includ

5 samples/hole

X) 1.5 sam

5 sample/hole

horous Pesticisample/hole

es would be anall be kept on ho

marised in T

with push tube maximum dep

onitoring wells.

nts recommende4933 hectares (1

mported fill soils

ing a mixed judral obstacles (e

bstructions).

d the installationed personnel.

assification Sysore logs are pre

encountered), eID) readings ar

g equipement.

screened with aesent.

soil samples wied primary sam

ding:

mple/hole

ides and Poly

alysed as per Seold should furth

able 7-1.

th of 8m at .

ed under 1493.3m2) s,

dgemental / e.g. building

n of the

stem sented in

evidence of ea noted.

a Photo

ill be mples will

ychlorinated

ection 9 of her


Ac

Soil Sam

DecontamProcedur

Sample P

Samplingreinstatesampling

Quality CLaborato

7.2 G

The worTable 7-


ctivity/Item

mpling

mination res

Preservation

g locations ement after g

Control & ory Analysis

GROUNDWA

rk objective-2.


Soil samsupplie

The solwater, hpush tu

Samplethe labo

Soil cutexcavat

Samplincompac

Any exand remappropr

A numbtesting laboratosubmitt

ATER INVES

s and Scope

NSW 4

mples were colld acid washed,

lid flight drillinhowever the pube location.

es were stored inoratory. All sam

ttings were usedtion or soon to b

ng locations wocted to ensure th

cess spoil that cmoved from siteriate waste clas

ber of soil sampcomprised intraory field duplicted for analysis

STIGATION

e of Works

24

lected using dedsolvent rinsed

ng rods were decush tube capabil

n a refrigeratedmples were subm

d as backfill forbe excavated.

ould be reinstathis condition is

cannot be returne and lawfully dssification.

ples were subma-laboratory ducate tested by En

of previously-i

for the grou

Details

dicated nitrile gglass jars.

contaminated blities used dedic

d (ice-brick fillemitted and anal

r drilled boreho

ted to pre-invest maintained.

ned to the borehdisposed of by a

mitted for analysuplicates (‘field nvirolab Servicidentified PCOC

undwater in

gloves and place

etween samplincated HDPE pu

ed) chest, whilstysed within the

oles as the site w

tigation conditi

hole will be stoa licensed contr

sis by SGS Laboduplicates’) tes

ces (Envirolab).C.

nvestigation

ed into clean, la

ng locations wiush tube liners a

t on-site and in e required holdi

was in the proce

ions and be suff

ored in drums atractor following

oratories (SGS)sted by SGS an. Selected samp

n are summa

aboratory-

th potable at each

transit to ing period.

ess of

ficiently

t the site g

). QA/QC d inter-

ples were

arised in


Table 7-

Activ

Date of Fie

Bores DrilDepth

Well Cons

Well Devel

Well Gaug

Well Purgitesting

Groundwa

DecontamiProcedure


-2: Grou

vity/Item

eld Work

lled and Targe

struction

lopment

ging

ing & field

ater sampling

ination e


undwater Sa

14th April

t InvestigatiMW3 respm BGL.

A total of tas part of tsite. ConstWell const2012. Rela

In summar

The monit

50 m3m w

base

gradeinterv

granucuttin

surfafinish

Well develrecharge premoval ofEnvironmesuspendedbecame drmonitoring

The depth were gaugpresence oPSH was dsampling.

The roundgroundwatbailer for eto the slogroundwatodours ormeasuremwere recorare detaile

Once eithewell was ptaken. Purwell (baserepresentatmeasurembailer to potential lo

Decontamindividual solution of

NSW 4

ampling Me

2014 (Groundw

ion boreholes utpectively) were

three (3) groundthe ESA works,truction details truction was carative locations o

ry, Groundwate

oring wells wer

m, Class 18 PVwell screen seate

and top of each

ed sand filter wval;

ular bentonite wngs were used t

ce completion fhed flush with t

lopment was copost install, thenf water and accuental, model Sup

d sediment was y. No odours org wells MW1, M

to groundwatered for depth to

of phase separatdetected within

d one (1) grounter monitoring weach well. Meaow recovery oter was observe

sheens were ents for Dissolvrded during bord in Section .9.

er three well vopurged dry, the rging continuedd on temperatutive groundwatents were recolaboratory-preposs of volatiles

ination was notwell. The wate

f potable water

25

ethodology

water Sampling

utilised for the sdrilled using a

ndwater monitor, and were utilidocumented by

arried out in genof the groundw

er wells were in

re constructed a

VC threaded, maed from the bas

h well was seale

was used within

was applied aboto backfill the b

for the wells invthe slab level or

onducted for ean agitated usingumulated sedim

uper Twister). Pobserved (i.e. ar sheens were nMW2 and MW3

r (SWL) was mgroundwater an

ted hydrocarbonany of the grou

ndwater monitwells at the site

asurement of waof groundwatered to be orang

noted as preved Oxygen (Dre purging. The.2.

olumes had beenwell was left tod until field paure and EC for ter quality had borded. Groundwpared containeduring samplin

t required on mer level probe anand Decon 90,

Details

)

oil assessment drill rig with so

ring wells instalsed for the purpy EI’s field envineral accordancater monitoring

nstalled at appro

as follows:

achine-slotted sse of well;

ed with a UPVC

bore annulus to

ove annular sandbore annulus to j

volved either a r a stickup pipe

ach well followig a dedicated HDment using a 12Pumping was coafter removal ofnoted as present3.

measured at eachnd a transparenns (PSH) prior tundwater monit

oring event (Ge was undertakeater quality parr within the mge in colour wisent in any o

DO), Electrical Cpurged volume

n purged or in to recover, then rameters indicasimilarities be

been achieved twater samples rs, using a lo

ng.

most sampling eqnd exterior of thfollowed by a r

(BH1, BH2 andolid-flight auger

lled during the pose of assessinironmental sciee with the stand

g wells are illust

oximately 8 m b

screen and casin

C cap;

o approximately

d filter to seal thjust below grou

steel gatic cove.

ing installation.DPE disposableV, HDPE subm

ontinued until nf between 3 andt during the dev

h well prior to snt HDPE bailer wto the commenctoring wells at t

GME) involvingen on 14th Aprilameters was co

monitoring welth poor clarity

of the groundwConductivity (Ee removed from

the instance of sfield groundwaated an influx otween wells), tto a practical exwere then colw flow attach

quipment as it whe water qualityrinse of potable

d BH5 being Mer to depths of a

investigation wng groundwaterentist is presentedards describedstrated in Figur

bgl, seated in si

ng, with slotted

y 500mm above

he screened intund level; and

er set in neat ce

. The wells were bailer, followe

mersible bore puno further reducd 5 well volumevelopment of gr

sampling. Moniwas used to viscement of well the time of deve

g the purging ail 2014 using a onducted post wll. For each mand a high se

water monitoriEC) and pH of tm each well and

slow recoverinater monitoring of fresh groundtherefore it wasxtent, and final llected by direhment (‘nib’) t

was dedicated ty kit probes wee water between

MW1, MW2 andapproximately 8

which occurred r quality at the ed in Table 9-3

d in LWBC, e 2.

ilty clays.

d intervals, with

e top of screen

erval and drill

ement and

re left to ed by the ump (Proactivetion in

es), or the well roundwater

itoring wells sually assess thepurging. No

elopment or

and sampling odedicated HDP

well purging, dumonitoring weldiment load. Ning wells. Fiethe purged wat

d field test resul

g wells, once thparameters wer

dwater within ths considered thphysio-chemic

ect transfer fromto minimise th

o each re washed in a n measurements

d 8

3.

h

e

e

of PE ue ll,

No ld er lts

he re he

hat cal m he

s


Activ

Sample Pr

Sample Tr

Groundw

laborator

contamin


vity/Item

reservation

ransport

water samp

ry analyse

nants of con


at differen

Sample co one,

two,

one 2

Samples fofilled withtransit to th

After sampChain-of-CEnvirolab Advice (SRof SRA an

ples were c

s on repre

ncern.

NSW 4

t sampling loca

ontainers were s1 litre amber gl

40ml glass vial

250mL, HDPE b

or metals analysample to the b

he laboratory.

pling, refrigeraCustody (COC)

Services Pty LRA) was provid

nd COC certific

collected fr

esentative s

26

ations.

supplied by the lass, acid-washe

ls, pre-preserve

bottle, pre-pres

sis were field-fbrim then cappe

ated sample ch) procedures. Ltd (Envirolabded by each labates are present

rom each g

samples pr

Details

laboratory withed and solvent-

d with dilute hy

served with dilu

filtered using 0.ed and stored in

ests were transInter-laboratory

b) for inter-labboratory to docted in Appendi

groundwate

roposed to

h the following rinsed bottle;

ydrochloric acid

ute nitric acid (1

45 µm pore-sizn ice-brick filled

sported to SGSy duplicate (ILoratory QA/QCument sample ix D.

er monitorin

be conduc

preservatives:

d, Teflon-sealed

1 mL).

ze filters. All cod chests on-site

S Australia PtyLD) samples weC analysis. A condition upon

ng well lo

cted for th

d; and

ontainers were e and during

Ltd using striere forwarded tSample Receip

n receipt. Copie

ocation, wit

he identifie

ict to pt es

th

ed


8.0 D

8.1 Q

For the

samples

laborator

Details o

for the d

Table 8-

Data

Re

Calcula

The RPD

RPD =

CO = ConCR = Con

Calcula

The trip s

X x 100

T

X = Obse


DATA QUA

QUALITY C

purpose of

for analys

ry, Envirol

of the field

data presente

-1: Sam

a Quality Obj

Accuracy

Precision

epresentativen

Completenes

tion of Rel

D values were

([CO – CR

(CO +2

ncentration oncentration o

tion of Spik

spike sample

0 %

erved value o


ALITY AS

ONTROL PR

f assessing

sis. The pr

lab Service

and laborat

ed in Table

mpling Data

jective

L

ness

ss

ative Perce

e calculated u

R] x 100) + CR) 2

obtained fromobtained from

ke Recover

e recovery va

of measurem

NSW 4

SESSMEN

ROGRAM

the quality

rimary labo

es Pty Ltd

tory QC sam

e 8-1 below.

Quality Ind

Dat

Field – Trip

Laboratory –

Field – Blin

Laboratory – L

Field – Trip

Labo

entage Diffe

using the fol

m the primarym the blind re

ry

alues were ca

ment. T = T

27

NT

y of data p

oratory, SG

(Envirolab

mples are pr

.

dicators

ta Quality In

p spike (labor

– Laboratory c

matrix spik

nd replicate an

Laboratory du

spike duplic

p blank (labor

oratory – Meth

Completion (

ference (RP

llowing equa

y sample. eplicate or sp

alculated usin

True value.

resented in

GS Australi

b) also prep

rovided, wi

dicator

atory prepared

control spike a

ke

nd spilt duplica

uplicate and m

ate

ratory prepared

hod blank

(%)

PD)

ation:

plit sample.

ng the follow

n this ESA,

ia Pty Ltd

pared and

th the allow

d)

and

7

Presc

ate

matrix

< 3

d

Presc

d)

Presc

wing equation

EI collect

(SGS) an

analysed Q

wable accep

Acceptable R

70 – 130 % re

cribed by the

30 % relative p

difference (RP

cribed by the

< laboratory l

reporting (L

cribed by the

-

n:

ted field QC

d secondar

QC samples

ptance range

Range

ecovery

laboratories

percentage

PD [%])

laboratories

limit of

LOR)

laboratories

C

ry

s.

es


8.2 F

The fieldas follow

B

I

T

T

R

The resu

Blind Fi

One (1)

sample B

soil from

sampling

to avoid

metals w

D, Table

respectiv

Addition

sample G

avoid an

metals w

D, Tab

concentr

criteria,

locations

Inter La

One (1)

primary

describe

calculate


Field QA/Q

d quality asws:

Blind field d

nter laborat

Trip blank;

Trip spike; a

Rinsate Blan

ults of the Q

ield Duplic

blind field

BH6-1. The

m the same

g vessels. T

d any potent

with the RPD

e QC5), ind

ve sampling

nally one (1

GW1-1. Th

ny potential

with the RPD

le QC5),

rations were

the sample

s.

aboratory D

inter labor

sample BH

ed above, a

ed for the IL


QC Data Ev

surance/qua

duplicate;

tory duplica

and

nk.

QA/QC samp

cate

duplicate (B

e preparatio

e sampling

The duplicat

tial analytic

D values ca

dicated that

g locations.

) blind field

e duplicate

l analytical

D values ca

with the e

e at low lev

s collected

Duplicate

ratory dupl

H1-1. The

and analyse

LD sample w

NSW 4

valuation

ality control

ate;

ples includi

BFD) soil s

on of the BF

point with

te sample w

cal bias. The

alculated fou

t the sample

d duplicate w

sample was

bias. The B

alculated fou

exception o

vels and with

were repre

icate (ILD)

preparation

ed for TPH

were found

28

l (QA/QC)

ing the calcu

sample, bein

FD sample

hout mixing

was then pre

e BFD was

und to be w

es collected

water samp

s then prese

BFD was a

und to be w

of copper

h all other R

esentative of

) soil samp

n of samp

H, BTEX a

d to be withi

samples col

ulated RPD

ng sample B

involved th

g, before di

esented blin

analysed fo

within the Da

were repre

ple, being sa

ented blind

analysed for

within the Da

(120%) an

RPD values

f the water

ple, being s

le I1 was

and selected

in the Data

llected durin

D values are

B1, was coll

he collectio

ividing the

nd to the pri

or TPH, BT

ata Accepta

sentative of

ample GW-B

to the prim

r TPH, BTE

ata Accepta

nd nickel (

s were foun

present at t

ample I1, w

identical t

d heavy me

Acceptance

ing the ESA

presented i

lected from

on of a bulk

material in

rimary labor

TEX and se

ance Criteria

f the soils p

B1, was col

mary laborato

TEX and sel

ance Criteria

(67%). How

nd within the

the respecti

was collect

to the BFD

etals. The

e Criteria (A

A works wer

in Table 8-2

m the primar

k quantity o

nto identica

ratory (SGS

lected heav

a (Appendi

present at th

llection from

ory (SGS) t

lected heav

a (Appendi

wever thes

e acceptanc

ive samplin

ted from th

D sample a

RPD value

Appendix D

re

2.

ry

of

al

S)

vy

ix

he

m

to

vy

ix

se

ce

ng

he

as

es

D,


Table Q

homogen

Append

volatiles

represen

Trip Bla

No trip b

laborator

Trip Sp

No trip s

laborator

Rinsate

One (1)

selected

exceptio

unlikely

procedur

Assessm

All soil

observab

Ranking

recorded

The FCR

0 - for s

1 - for s

2 - for s

3 - for s


QC5). The

nous, being

dix E). Furth

s within th

ntative of the

ank

blank samp

ry issues. H

ike

spike sampl

ry issues. H

Blank

rinsate blan

heavy met

on of some

to affect

res perform

ment of Fiel

samples w

ble signs of

g (FCR) Sy

d on test bor

R system wa

amples that

amples that

amples that

amples that


variance in

g consistent

her to this, s

he sample.

e soils prese

les were su

However, all

les were sub

However all

nk (RB) sam

tals. The RB

metals, how

the quality

med during th

ld QA/QC D

were classi

f contamina

ystem was

re logs.

as assigned

t did not dis

t displayed

t displayed

t display sig

NSW 4

n RPD can

with field

soil sample

Therefore,

ent at the re

ubmitted to t

l the BTEX

bmitted to t

the BTEX

mple was s

B sample re

wever for so

y of result

he field wor

Data

fied in the

ation based

applied to

to samples

splay any vi

slight visua

obvious sig

gnificant sig

29

n be explai

observation

s were plac

, EI conclu

espective sa

the laborato

X results wer

the laborato

results were

submitted to

esults were

oil metals r

ts. It was

rks had bee

e field with

on visual a

o each litho

on the follo

isual signs o

al signs of c

gns of conta

gns of conta

ined as the

ns and as de

ced directly

uded that

ampling loca

ory as part o

re below the

ory as part o

e below the

o the prima

reported b

results were

s therefore

en effective.

h respect t

nd odour as

ological so

owing basis

of contamin

ontaminatio

mination an

amination an

e soil samp

escribed in

into jars so

that the sa

ations.

of this inves

e adopted cr

of this inves

adopted cri

ry laborator

elow the la

e well below

concluded

o soil/fill c

ssessment.

il sample,

s:

nation or det

on and/or de

nd/or detect

nd/or detect

ples were n

the boreho

o as to reduc

amples col

stigation du

riteria.

stigation du

riteria.

ry for TPH

aboratory L

w the SIL a

d that deco

characterist

A Field Co

and FCR

tectable odo

etectable od

table odours

table odours

not perfectl

ole logs (Ref

ce the loss o

llected wer

ue to interna

ue to interna

H, BTEX an

OR with th

and therefor

ontaminatio

tics and an

ontaminatio

values wer

ours;

dours;

s; and

s.

ly

ef.

of

re

al

al

nd

he

re

on

ny

on

re


All sam

laborator

documen

The ove

assessme

the envir

Based on

out durin

8.3 L

To unde

as the s

operate i

the com

National

In relatio

each lab

fall outs

provided

8.3.1 S

All samp

D, Table

8.3.2 T

Practical

presente

8.3.3 M

Concent

laborator


mples, inclu

ries under

ntation were

erall compl

ent was con

ronmental c

n the result

ng the ESA

LABORATOR

ertake all an

econdary la

in accordan

mpetence of

l Associatio

on to contin

boratory’s Q

side the DQ

d to this effe

Sample Hol

ple holding

es QC1 and

Test Metho

l Quantitat

ed in Appen

Method Bla

trations of

ry PQLs an


uding field

strict Ch

e included i

leteness of

nsidered to b

condition of

ts of the fie

works to b

RY QA/QC

nalytical test

aboratory. S

nce with the

calibration

on Testing A

ngencies, sh

QC policy,

QOs, then sa

ect on the fi

lding Time

g times were

QC2.

ods and Pra

tion Limits

ndix D, Tabl

anks

all parame

nd were ther

NSW 4

QC samp

hain-of-Cust

in the respec

documenta

be adequate

f the site.

ld QA/QC

e appropria

ting, EI com

SGS and E

e guidelines

n and testin

Authorities (

hould the pr

respective t

ample heter

inal laborato

es

e within sta

actical Qua

for the te

les QC3 and

eters in m

refore within

30

ples, were

tody cond

ctive report

ation produ

e for the pur

data, EI co

ate and the r

mmissioned

Envirolab, b

s set out in

ng laborator

(NATA)-re

re-determin

tests are ac

rogeneity m

ory certifica

andard envir

antitation L

ested param

d QC4.

method blan

n the DAC.

transported

itions and

ts.

uced under

rposes of dr

nsidered th

results to be

d SGS as the

both establi

ISO/IEC G

ries”, condu

gistered pro

ed DQOs n

ccordingly r

may be assu

ate.

ronmental p

Limits (PQL

meters duri

nks during

d to the p

appropriat

the field p

rawing valid

e field QA/

acceptable

e primary la

shed analyt

Guide 25 “G

ucted all res

ocedures.

not be achiev

repeated. S

umed and w

protocols as

Ls)

ing the ass

the assess

primary and

ate copies

program of

d conclusio

/QC program

e.

aboratory an

tical labora

General requ

spective an

ved, in acco

Should the

written comm

s tabulated

sessments

sment were

d secondar

of relevan

f the subjec

ons regardin

mme carrie

nd Envirola

atories whic

uirements fo

nalyses usin

ordance wit

results agai

ment will b

in Appendi

of soils ar

e below th

ry

nt

ct

ng

ed

ab

ch

or

ng

th

in

be

ix

re

he


8.3.4 L

The Lab

and conf

8.3.5 L

The Lab

conform

LB0559

Howeve

8.3.6 M

The mat

DAC.


Laboratory

boratory Du

formed to th

Laboratory

boratory Con

med to the D

23.002 in S

er the labora

Matrix Spik

trix spikes


y Duplicate

uplicate Sam

he DAC.

y Control S

ntrol Sampl

DAC, with

SGS labora

atory results

kes

of the anal

NSW 4

e Samples

mples (LCS

Samples

les (LCS) fo

the except

atory referen

s for OCP w

lysis batche

31

S) for the an

or the analy

tion of Tetr

nce SE1212

were non det

es were wit

nalysis batc

ysis batches

rachloro-m-

26807 in w

tect and we

thin accept

hes were w

were withi

-xylene in l

which raised

ll below the

able ranges

within accep

in acceptabl

laborataory

d the limit

e SIL.

s and confo

ptable range

le ranges an

y QC sampl

of reporting

ormed to th

es

nd

le

g.

he

Enviro110-11Report

Table

Sam

ple

iden

tifi

cati

on

Intra-l

BH6-

B1

Inter-l

BH6-

I1

Intra-l

GW1

GW-B

Rinsat

R1 Note: aNS

onmental Site Assess12 Addison Road, Mt No. E22157 AA 2n

e 8-2: Summarpercenta

Des

crip

tion

laboratory Duplica

-1 Fill

BFD of BH6

RPD

laboratory Duplica

-1 Fill

ILD of BH6

RPD

laboratory Duplica

1 Groundwate

B1 BFD of GW

RPD

te Blanks

De-ionised waall soil analysis is rep

‘Not Sampled’ An

82.35 R

sment Marrickville NSW nd May 2014

ry of laboratoryage differences (

T

F1*

F2*

* ate - Soil

<25 <25

6-1 <25 <25

0 0

ate – Soil

<25 <25

6-1 <25 <50

NA NA

ate - Water

er <50 <60

W1 <50 <60

0.00 0

ater <50 <60ported in mg/kg and walysis was not perform

RPD exceeds 30-50

y results for BFD(% RPD)

TRH

F3

(>C

16 -

C34

)

F4

(>C

34 -

C40

)

5 <90 <120

5 <90 <120

0 0

5 <90 <120

0 <100 <100

A NA NA

0 <500 <500

0 <500 <500

0 0

0 <500 <500 waters are reported in µmed

% range referenced

D samples and I

BTEX

Ben

zene

Tol

uene

Eth

lb

<0.1 <0.1 <0

<0.1 <0.1 <0

0 0 0

<0.1 <0.1 <0

<0.2 <0.5 <

NA NA N

<0.5 <0.5 <0

<0.5 <0.5 <0

0 0 0

<0.5 <0.5 <0µg/L.

d from AS4482.1 (2

32

ILD samples fo

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e

Xyl

ene

(tot

al)

Ars

enic

0.1 <0.3 4

0.1 <0.3 5

0 0 22

0.1 <0.3 4

<1 <2 <4

NA NA NA

0.5 <1.5 <1

0.5 <1.5 <1

0 0 0

0.5 <1.5 <1

2005)

r Soil and Grou

Cad

miu

m

Chr

omiu

m (

Tot

al)

0.3 15

0.3 11

0 31

0.3 15

<0.4 14

NA NA

<1 <1

<1 <1

0 0

<0.1 <1

undwater, field Q

Heavy Metals

Cop

per

Lea

d

26 9 <

29 14 0

11 43

26 9 <

29 15 <

7 11

4 <1 <0

1 <1 <0

120 0

41 <1 <0

QC duplicates,

Mer

cury

Nic

kel

Zi

<0.01 56 4

0.01 52 5

0 7 1

<0.01 56 4

<0.1 61 3

50 NA

0.0001 4 2

0.0001 2 1

0 67 5

0.0001 2 7

with calculated

Zin

c

45

52

14

45

36

9

20

12

50

79

relative


9.0 R

9.1 S

Soil sam

0.2m to

signs of

fragmen

observat

No v

locat

PID

rang

readi

No f

Borehole

in Appen

9.1.1 S On the b

condition


RESULTS

SOIL RESUL

mples were

3.5m BGL

f contamina

nts, ash, cha

tions were n

visual and o

tions invest

VOC conc

ing from 0.

ings at each

fibrous boar

e logs were

ndix E.

Sub-Surfac

basis of obs

ns is presen


AND DISC

LTS

obtained fr

. All exam

ation (e.g.

arcoal, etc.)

noted.

olfactory ev

igated durin

centrations

.0 – 10 part

h soil sampl

rd, ash, char

e prepared f

ce Conditio

servations m

nted in Tabl

NSW 4

CUSSION

rom the test

ined soils w

hydrocarbo

) if any, an

vidence of

ng this asses

were detect

ts per millio

ing location

rcoal or slag

for all test h

ns

made during

le 9-1.

33

t bores BH

were evalua

on odours,

nd on the ba

hydrocarbo

ssment;

ted from so

on (ppm). A

n was comp

g was obser

holes and in

g the drilling

1 to BH7,

ated on a qu

oil staining

asis of the

on impacts w

oil samples

Analysis of

pleted by the

rved in any o

ncluded sam

g investigat

at various d

ualitative ba

g, petrochem

field-work

were noted

collected f

f soil sample

e laboratory

of the exam

mple descrip

tion, a summ

depths rang

asis for odou

mical filmi

findings, th

d at any of

from the te

es with the

y.

mined fill so

ptions and a

mary of site

ging betwee

ur and visua

ing, asbesto

he followin

the borehol

est borehole

highest PID

ils; and

are presente

e sub-surfac

en

al

os

ng

le

es

D

ed

ce


Table 9-

Mater

Fill

Fill

Residual

Notes: 1 A

te Groundw

program

9.1.2 S

Laborat

Table 9-

Table 9-

Heavy M

Results

heavy m

TPHs an

Results o

adopted

PAHs

Results o

either no

Asbestos

No detec

samples.

Other O

Non-det

samples,


-1: Sum

rial Dep

0 to 0

0.2 to

Soil 0.5 (in

Approximate dest locations.

water/seepa

m.

Soil Labora

tory analyti

-2 and pres

-2 also inclu

Metals

of soil sam

metals to be b

nd BTEX

of the tested

human hea

of the tested

on-detectabl

s

ctable asbest

Organics

ectable con

, with all lab


mmary of Su

pth (m BGL

0.20 (in all bore

0.5 (in all bore

n all boreholes)(BH2)

depth below g

age was visu

atory Resul

ical results

sented in de

udes the ado

mples collect

below the a

d soil samp

alth based SI

d soil samp

le or trace c

tos concentr

ncentrations

boratory qu

NSW 4

ub-Surface C

L) 1

holes) Conc

eholes) SiltySilty

) to 8.0 Silty

ground level. R

ually identif

lts

for the rep

etail in copi

opted soil c

ted from th

adopted hum

les reported

ILs.

ples reported

concentratio

rations or tr

s of the s

uantitation li

34

Conditions

crete slab hards

y sand, coarse gy clay, low plas

y CLAYS, oran

Refer to boreh

fied at 6.5m

presentative

ies of the la

criteria.

he test boreh

man health b

d concentrat

d concentra

ons, being w

races of res

creened OC

imits being

Gener

stand.

grained, yellow ticity with trace

nge/red/grey, low

hole reports in

m in BH1, B

e discrete

aboratory an

holes repor

based SILs.

tions of the

ations of the

within the ad

pirable fibre

CP or OPP

within the

ral Descript

with traces of ses of sandstone

w to high plasti

Appendix B f

BH2 and BH

soil sample

nalytical rep

ted concent

screened fr

e screened P

dopted SILs

es were iden

P compoun

correspondi

tion

sandstone piece pieces.

icity plasticity.

for specific in

H5 during th

es are sum

ports in Ap

trations of

fractions to b

PAH compo

s.

ntified in th

nds were i

ing SILs.

es; or

nformation at

he field wor

mmarised in

ppendix G.

the screene

be below th

ounds to be

he tested so

identified i

rk

ed

he

oil

in

Environm110-112 AReport N

Table 9

Notes: All rBold / highHIL B NE # Th+ ThNL ‘N

risND ‘NN.A. Th

mental Site AssAddison Road

No. E22157 AA

9-2: Soil

results are recordhlighted values exEPC 1999 Ammehresholds are for Che Limit of Repor

Not Limiting’ If thsk for the given sc

Not detected’ i.e. ahe sample was no

Sample ID

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2

BH3-1

BH4-1

BH4-2

BH5-1

BH6-1

BH6-2

BH7-1

HIL B - Reside

HSL A & HSL

Soil tex

MResidential, park

Asbes

B

AsbesNon Bond

sessment d, MarrickvilleA 2nd Mary 20

l Laboratory

ed in mg/kg xceed the SILs endment 2013 ‘HIChromium VI. Itrting (LOR) has bhe derived soil vacenario, thereforeall concentrationst analysed

Sam

pling Depth

(@ m

BG

L)

0.2-0.3

0.6-0.7

0.2-0.3

0.6-0.7

0.2-0.3

0.2-0.3

0.7-0.8

0.2-0.3

0.2-0.3

0.5-0.6

0.1-0.2

ntial with minimal o soil access

B - Low - high dens

xture classification –

Management Limitskland and public opgrained soil texture

stos contamination Residential B

onded ACM (%w/w

tos contamination Hded / Friable Asbesto

e 14

y Results

IL B” Health Bast is assumed all dbeen raised due toapour limit exceede the limit is not ls of the compoun

Sam

pling Date

11/04/2014

7/03/2014

7/03/2014

6/03/2014

6/03/2014

6/03/2014

6/03/2014

6/03/2014

6/03/2014

7/03/2014

7/03/2014

opportunities for

sity residential.

–Sand 1

s – pen space, Coarse e2

HSL –

w)5

HSL for os (%w/w)5

sed Investigation detected Chromiuo inferences in theds the soil concenlimiting. ds within the ana

As Cd

<3 <0.3

5 <0.3

4 <0.3

7 0.3

5 <0.3

4 0.3

4 <0.3

<3 <0.3

4 0.3

4 <0.3

4 <0.3

500 150

Source depths (

Source depths (

Source depth (2

Levels applicablum is Chromium (e sample matrix ntration at which

alyte group were f

Heav

Cr Cu

8.7 3.2

16 3.3

10 9.2

23 3.7

14 13

12 16

18 4.8

7.7 9.2

15 26

18 3.6

15 7.8

500 Cr(VI)

30,000

(0 m to <1 m. BG

(1 m to <2 m. BG

2m to <4 m. BGL

le for residential (VI), as Chromium

the pore water ph

found to be below

vy Metals

Pb Hg

5 <0.01

11 <0.01

30 0.04

15 <0.01

19 0.02

20 0.01

9 <0.01

10 <0.01

9 <0.01

12 0.01

23 0.02

0 1,200 120

GL)

GL)

L)

exposure settingsm (III) would be

hase cannot disso

w the laboratory l

Ni Z

1 8 7

1 1.7 7

4 5.9 5

1 1.5 2

2 15 2

30 3

1 5.2 5

1 19 2

1 56 4

2.8 6

2 7.6 1

0 1,200 60

s with minimal optoo unstable to ex

olve any more of t

limits of detection

Zn

Carcinogenic P

AH

s (as B

(α)P T

EQ

)***

.8 <0.2

.6 <0.2

51 <0.2

23 <0.2

28 <0.2

1 <0.2

.8 <0.2

27 <0.2

45 <0.2

.3 <0.2

9 2.9

,000 4

pportunities for soxist under norma

the individual ch

n

PAHs

Total P

AH

s

Benzo(α)pyrene

<0.8 <

<0.8 <

1.1 0

<0.8 <

1.5 0

<0.8 <

<0.8 <

<0.8 <

<0.8 <

<0.8 <

20

400

35

oil access, includal circumstances.

emical, i.e. where

Benzo(α)pyrene

Naphthalene

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

0.1 <0.1

2 <0.1SILs

3

NL

NL

ding dwellings wit

e the soil vapour

Benzene

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

0.5

0.5

0.5

th fully and perm

is at equilibrium

BTEX

Toluene

Ethylbenzene

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

<0.1 <0

160 5

220 N

310 N

manently paved ya

with the pore wa

Ethylbenzene

Total X

ylenes

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

0.1 <0.3

55 40

NL 60

NL 95

ard space such as

ater, then the soil

F1*

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

45

70

110

700

s high rise buildin

vapour source ca

TPHs

F2**

F3 (>

C16 -C

34 )

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 <90

<25 140

110

240

440

1000 2500

ngs and apartmen

annot exceed a lev

F4 (>

C34 -C

40 )

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

<120

0 10000

nts.

vel that would re

OC

Ps

OPPs

ND ND

N.A. N.A.

ND ND

N.A. N.A.

ND ND

ND ND

N.A. N.A.

ND ND

ND ND

N.A. N.A.

ND ND

NR NR

sult in the maxim

Total P

CB

s

ND

N.A.

ND

N.A.

ND

ND

N.A.

ND

ND

N.A.

ND

1

mum allowable va

A

sbestos

ND

N.A.

ND

N.A.

ND

ND

N.A.

ND

ND

N.A.

ND

0.04

0.001

apour


9.1.3 D

On revie

analytes


Discussion

ew of the so

are within


of Soil Res

oil results a

the SILs.

NSW 4

ults

as a whole,

36

it appears tthat the conncentrations

s of all of thhe reported


9.2 G

9.2.1 G

During t

groundw

Figure 2

Table 9-

Table 9-

Well ID

MW1

MW2

MW3

9.2.2 G

Groundw

well loc

groundw

field wo

Prior to

standing

well was

sampling

Total di

paramete

Final pu


GROUNDWA

Groundwat

the drilling

water monit

2. Constru

-3.

-3: Grou

Ground

Bore D

(m BG

8

8.1

8.04

Groundwat

water purgi

cations MW

water monito

rk was com

the comme

g water leve

s then purge

g. Field me

issolved so

ers were rec

urge results a


ATER RESUL

ter Monitor

g works con

toring well

uction detai

undwater M

dwater

Depth

GL)

1

45

ter Field O

ng and sam

W1 to MW

oring wells

mpleted.

encement o

el meter to

ed to remov

asurements

lids (TDS)

corded, foll

are summar

NSW 4

LTS

ring Well C

nducted by

s identified

ils of each

Monitoring W

Screen Interv

(m BGL)

5.0 – 7.0

5.1 – 8.1

5.045 – 8.04

bservation

mpling occu

W3. Groundw

MW1 to M

f sampling,

determine

ve stagnant

for water t

, and pH o

owed by the

rised with a

37

Constructio

y EI, boreho

d as MW1

groundwate

Well Constr

val L

45

ns

urred on the

water mon

MW3 durin

, standing w

the depth

water using

temperature

of the purg

e collection

all field mon

on

oles BH1,

to MW3 r

er monitori

ruction Deta

Lithology Scree

Silty Clay

Silty Clay

Silty Clay

e 14th April

itoring wel

ng the 11th A

water level

of local gro

g hand baile

e, Electric C

ged ground

n of represen

nitoring data

BH2 and B

respectively

ng well are

ails

ened

l 2014, at g

ll developm

April 2014

measureme

oundwater w

ers and allow

Conductivity

dwater were

ntative grou

a in Table 9

BH5 were

y, located a

e summaris

groundwater

ment was c

installation

ents were ta

within each

wed to rech

y (EC), Tot

e collected

undwater sa

9-4.

converted t

as shown i

sed below i

r monitorin

conducted a

n works afte

aken using

h well. Eac

harge prior t

tal Dissolve

. Final fiel

mples.

to

in

in

ng

at

er

a

ch

to

ed

ld


Table 9-

Well ID

MW1

MW2

MW3

Overall,

be slight

9.2.3 G

Based o

collected

groundw

was con

site, and

9.2.4 G

Laborato

copies o

relevant

River) i

disturbed

With ref

compoun

assessme


-4: Field

SWL (mBTOC)

0.652

0.729

1.232

field groun

tly acidic (p

Groundwat

on the relat

d on 14th A

water flow i

nsidered that

d is consider

Groundwat

ory results

of the labora

groundwat

is marine, m

d systems w

ference to

nds were fo

ent.


d-based gro

Temp oC

pH

20.79 5.1

19.97 6.0

21.59 6.5

ndwater para

pH 5.11 to 6

ter Flow Di

tive water

April 2014,

is in an sou

t Cooks Riv

red to be a m

ter Analyti

for the ana

atory analyt

ter investiga

marine wat

were applied

Table 9-5,

ound to be b

NSW 4

undwater m

H EC

(µS/cm

11 3961

01 823

55 742

ameters rev

6.55) and fre

irection

levels obta

and the lo

uth, south e

ver shall be

marine wate

cal Results

alysed grou

tical reports

ation criteri

ter investig

d.

all reporte

below the g

38

measuremen

m) TDS (ppm)

2361

494

466

vealed the gr

esh to brack

ained using

ocal topogr

east towards

e the receiv

er feature.

s

undwater sa

s attached a

ia (GIL). A

gation level

ed concentr

groundwater

nts

DO (ppm)

Pur

0.15

2.77

0.35

roundwater

kish (EC ran

standing w

raphy of th

s Cooks Riv

ving water b

amples are

as Appendix

As the clos

ls applicabl

rations of T

r investigati

rge Vol. (L)

O(

80L No

30L No

25L No

present at t

nging from

water levels

he site, the

ver/Alexand

body of grou

summarise

x G. Table

est receivin

le to typica

TRH fractio

ion levels (G

Odour (Y/N)

o odour se

cla

o odour se

cla

o odour se

cla

the site is co

742 to 3961

s from MW

suggested

dria Canal.

undwater p

ed in Table

e 9-5 also in

ng water bo

al slightly-m

ons, BTEX

GILs) adop

AdditionalComments

Red/brown, lowediment load, pority, high recov

no sheen

Red/brown, lowediment load, poarity, low recov

no sheen

Red/brown, lowediment load, poarity, low recov

no sheen

onsidered to

1 µS/cm).

W1 to MW

direction o

Therefore

present at th

e 9-5, with

ncludes the

ody (Cooks

moderately

X and PAH

pted for this

w oor very,

w oor ery,

w oor ery,

o

W3

of

it

he


The con

reported

copper, n

Although

investiga

includin

concentr

structura

attributa

Furtherm

not exce

are who

within b

metropo

It can b

immedia

as a slig

condition

material

environm

therefore

9.2.4 D

EI notes

be above

separate

to be pre

appropri

consider


ncentrations

d to be belo

nickel and z

h no speci

ation, these

g building

rations wer

al metal coa

able to the

more given

eeding the a

olly derived

background

olitan ground

be inferred

ate threat to

ght exceeda

ns, in the ab

s, the ident

mental conc

e considered

Discussion

that the sta

e the screen

d hydrocarb

esent at 6.5

iate at the t

red unlikely


of heavy

ow the ado

zinc in all th

ific, potenti

metals are

wirings and

re potential

atings, or w

on-site us

that backgr

adopted SIL

d from the s

fluctuation

dwater catc

that the de

o human hea

ance of the

bsence of c

tified groun

cern and fu

d unwarrant

of Groundw

anding wate

ned interval

bons (PSH)

5m BGL, th

time of inst

y that PSH w

NSW 4

metals repo

opted criteri

he samples.

ial sources

commonly

d pipes. It w

ly the resu

water leakag

es of these

round soil l

L criteria it

subject site

s of natural

hment area

etected grou

alth or the e

trigger val

ontaminate

ndwater con

further grou

ted.

water Resu

er levels wit

ls at 0.652 t

) at this loc

herefore the

allation. Du

would be pr

39

orted within

ia with the

of copper

y found in st

was consid

ult of long-

ge from serv

e materials

levels for th

t is therefor

. The detec

lly occurrin

.

undwater le

environmen

lue, or repr

d fill/soils a

ncentrations

undwater in

ults

thin all the g

to 0.729, wh

cation. Duri

e screening

ue to the ab

resent.

n groundwa

exception

r, zinc or n

tructures an

dered that th

-term weath

vices in the

during th

hese heavy

re considere

cted levels

ng levels for

evels of th

nt. In either

resentative o

and all othe

s are not co

nvestigation

groundwate

hich could r

ng drilling,

level of 4 –

bsence of T

ater sample

of some m

nickel were

nd pipes as w

he identified

hering of m

local area,

e operation

metals acro

ed unlikely

can be also

r these heav

ese heavy

r case, whet

of urban ba

er potential

onsidered to

n for dissol

er monitorin

result in the

groundwat

– 8m BGL

TPH concen

es GW1 – G

minor excee

e identified

well as met

d elevated

metal-based

and are no

nal history

ross the site

that the co

o considere

vy metals in

metals do

ther this res

ackground

on-site sou

o represent

lved heavy

ng wells we

e impairmen

ter seepage

was consid

ntrations at

GW3 were

edances for

d during th

tal materials

groundwate

d paints an

t necessaril

of the site

e were foun

oncentration

d to be we

n the Sydne

not pose a

sult is treate

groundwate

rces of thes

t a cause fo

metals wa

ere found to

nt of phase

was noted

dered to be

MW2, it is

he

s,

er

nd

ly

e.

nd

ns

ll

ey

an

ed

er

se

or

as


In light

confined

phenome

of the str


of the diffe

d water-bea

enon in wat

rata and the


erence in wa

aring zone w

ter-bearing

e presence o

NSW 4

ater level el

within the u

zones withi

of structural

40

levations, it

underlying

in the lithol

l discontinui

t is likely th

strata. We

logy of the

ities within

hat groundw

note this is

site, due to

the formati

water is pres

s a common

o differentia

ion.

sent within

nly observe

al weatherin

a

ed

ng

E1R

T

NALN**1 2 3

4

5 6 H

Environmental Site A110-112 Addison RoReport No. E22157 A

Table 9-5: Su

Sample Identification

GW1 GW2 GW3

GIL*

Notes: All GIL values sourceLevels for Soil and GrNR = No current publi = To obtain F1 subtr* = To obtain F2 subt= Values have been c= Figure may not pro= Chemical for which

= NEPM (2013) Tabexceedances be iden= NEPM (2013) Gro= NEPM (1999) Grou

Highlighted Bold indi

Assessment oad, Marrickville AA 2nd May 2014

ummary of Grou

As Cd Cr

<1 <1 <1 <1 <0. <1 <1 0.2 <1

NR 0.7 272 (Cr 4.42 (Cr

ed from National Envroundwater, (NEPC) Iish criterion ract the sum of BTEXtract Naphthalene frocalculated using a harotect key species fromh possible bioaccumu

ble 1A(4) Groundwatentified, soil vapour assoundwater Investigatioundwater Investigatioicate analyte concentr

undwater Labora

Heavy Metals

Cu Pb

4 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <

III) VI)

1.31 4.41

vironment Protection Investigation levels ap

X concentrations from m the >C10-C16 fractio

rdness of 30mg/L CaCm chronic toxicity, refeulation and secondary

er HSLs for vapour insessments should be uon Levels for drinkingon Levels for the proteration value exceedin

atory Analysis R

Hg Ni Zn

<0.0001 4 20 <0.0001 14 34 <0.0001 17 49

0.13 71 152

(Assessment of Site pply to Marine Water

the C6-C10 fraction. on. CO3refer to ANZECCfer to ANZECC & AR

poisoning effects sho

ntrusion at the contamundertaken. g water quality, basedection of freshwater ag the adopted criteria

41

Results – Heavy M

PAHs

Total P

AH

s

Benzo(α)pyrene

Naphthalene

<1 <0.1 <0.<1 <0.1 <0.<1 <0.1 <0.

NR NR 50

Contamination) Mears for typical slightly-m

C & ARMCANZ (200RMCANZ (2000) for fould be considered, re

minant source depth ra

d on Australian Drinkaquatic ecosystems (Na

Metals, PAHs, B

BT

Nh

hl

Benzene

Toluene

1 <0.5 <0.5 1 <0.5 <0.5 1 <0.5 <0.5

0 0.84 NR4 3

sure 1999 – Amendmmoderately disturbed

00) for further guidancfurther guidance

efer to ANZECC & AR

nges in sands 4m to <

king Water GuidelinesNEPM 1999, Schedule

BTEX, TPHs

TEX

Ethylbenzene

o-xylene

m/p-xylene

<0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <1

005 350 200

ment 2013, Schedule systems.

ce on recalculating fo

RMCANZ (2000) for

<8m as groundwater w

s (NHMRC 2011).

e B1).

TPHs

F1* F2**

<50 <60 <<50 <60 <<50 <60 <

10004 10004

(B1) - Guideline on I

or site-specific hardne

r further guidance

was present between 5

F3 (>

C16 -C

34 )

F4 (>

C34 -C

40 )

<500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500

NR NR

Investigation

ss

5.442 and 4.272m BGGL, should

Environm110-112 MReport No

10.0 C

The prop

Site Ass

identifie

Assessm

The

vaca

The

Soil

down

The

natur

Resu

of th

adop

No d

With

TPH

were

asses

copp

Stage 2

risk of h

density r

For futu

appropri

Guidelin

ental Site AssMarrickville Ro. E22157 AA

CONCLUS

perty locate

sessment in

ed current

ment, it was

site is a sli

ated car was

site was fre

sampling an

n to a maxim

sub-surface

ral silty clay

ults of soil s

he screened

pted human

detectable a

h the except

H fractions,

e found to

ssment. Th

per, zinc and

ESA findin

harm to end

residential l

ure off-site

iate soil d

nes.

essment Road, Marrick

2nd May 2014

SIONS AND

ed at 110-11

n order to

and forme

concluded t

ightly skew

shing facility

ee of statuto

nd analysis

mum depth

e layers co

ys;

samples col

d heavy me

health base

sbestos or tr

tion of copp

VOC, BTE

be below

ese minor

d nickel.

ngs indicate

d users. It is

land use wit

disposal of

disposal in

kville NSW 4

D RECOM

12 Addison

assess the

r land use

that:

wed rectangu

y covering a

ory notices i

were condu

of 8m BGL

omprised of

llected from

etals TPH,

ed SILs.

races of res

per, nickel

EX and PA

the groun

exceedance

e that contam

s therefore c

th minimal

f site soils,

accordanc

42

MMENDAT

n Road, Mar

potential fo

es. Based o

ular shaped

a total area

issued by th

ucted at sev

L.

f fill mater

m soil test bo

BTEX, PA

spirable fibr

and zinc, a

AH compou

ndwater inv

es are likel

minants at

considered

access to so

waste class

ce with th

IONS

rrickville w

for on-site c

on the find

d block whi

of approxim

he NSW EPA

ven (7) targe

rials of var

oreholes BH

AH, OCPs,

res were ide

all reported

unds within

vestigation

ly due to th

the site are

that the site

oil.

sification te

he DECCW

as the subje

contaminati

dings of th

ch was foun

mately 1,49

A/DECC;

eted test bor

rious comp

H1 to BH7

OPPs and

ntified in th

concentrati

n groundwa

levels (GI

he natural

unlikely to

e is suitable

esting is rec

W (2009)

ect of an En

ion associa

his Environ

und to be oc

93.3m2.

re locations

position wh

reported co

PCBs to b

he tested soi

ions of Hea

ater sample

ILs) adopte

background

o represent

e for future

commended

Waste Cla

nvironment

ated with th

nmental Sit

ccupied by

(BH1-BH7

ich overlay

oncentration

be below th

il samples.

avy Metals,

s collected

ed for this

d levels of

a significan

proposed h

d to enable

assification

al

he

te

a

7)

ys

ns

he

f

nt

hi


11.0 S

The find

used in

soil sam

condition

investiga

While n

liability

agencies

resulting

Despite

contamin

investiga

natural

spillages

and asse

EI’s ass

program

the prop

nor does

the inves

This rep

any part

report do

This rep

for this

permissi


STATEME

dings presen

accordance

mpling from

ns across

ation progra

normal asse

for errors i

s (e.g. Cou

g from situa

all reasonab

nants measu

ated. In ad

conditions,

s of contam

essment.

essment is

m of surface

posal. Neith

s EI assume

stigations.

port was pre

of this repo

oes not purp

port and asso

assessment

ion by EI.


2nd May 2014

ENT OF LIM

nted in this r

with best i

m point loc

a site can

am.

ssments of

in any data

uncil, EPA,

ations outsid

ble care and

ured may no

ddition, site

chemical

minating sub

necessarily

and subsur

her EI, nor

e any liabili

epared for t

ort in any o

port to prov

ociated doc

t. The repo

kville NSW 4

MITATIO

report are th

industry pra

cations, it

nnot be ful

f data reliab

a obtained f

, etc.), stat

de the scope

d diligence,

ot be repres

characteris

reactions a

stances. Th

y based upo

rface sampl

any other r

ity for site

the above n

other contex

vide legal ad

cuments rem

ort shall no

43

NS

he result of

actices and

is conside

lly defined

bility have

from previo

tements fro

e of works o

the ground

sentative of

stics may ch

and other

hese change

on the resu

ing, screeni

reputable c

conditions

named clien

xt or for any

dvice.

main the pro

ot be repro

f discrete an

standards.

ered likely

d, no matte

been made

ous assessm

om sources

of this proje

d conditions

conditions

hange at an

events, e.g

es may occu

ult of the si

ing and che

onsultant, c

not observe

nt and no re

y other purp

operty of EI

oduced exce

nd specific s

Due to the

that all va

er how co

e, EI assum

ments condu

outside of

ect.

encountere

between the

y time in re

. groundwa

ur subsequen

ite investiga

emical testin

can provide

ed or access

esponsibility

pose or by o

I subject to

ept in full

sampling me

e site-speci

ariations in

omprehensiv

mes no resp

ucted on site

f EI, or d

ed and conc

e locations

esponse to

ater movem

nt to EI’s in

ation and t

ng which w

e unqualifie

sible during

y is accepte

other third p

payment of

and with p

ethodologie

fic nature o

n subsurfac

ve the fiel

onsibility o

e, regulator

evelopment

entrations o

sampled an

variations i

ment and o

nvestigation

he restricte

was set out i

ed warrantie

g the time o

ed for use o

parties. Thi

f all fees du

prior writte

es

of

ce

ld

or

ry

ts

of

nd

in

or

ns

ed

in

es

of

of

is

ue

en


REFER AustraliaFresh an DEC (20NSW Sit DECCWand Wat DMR (1Departm EPA (19New Sou EPA (19Wales, C NEPM (1999. Na


RENCES

an and Newnd Marine W

006) Soil Inte Auditor S

W (2009) Wter, New So

966) 1:250ment of Mine

994) Guideluth Wales, C

995) SampContaminate

(2013) Natiational Env


2nd May 2014

w Zealand EWater Qual

nvestigationScheme, 2nd

Waste Classifouth Wales,

0,000 Geologeral Resour

lines for AsContaminat

pling Designed Sites Un

ional Envirvironmental

kville NSW 4

Environmentity, Nationa

n Levels for Edn., NSW

ification GuDECCW 2

gical Seriesrces.

ssessing Serted Sites Un

n Guidelinnit, EPA 95/

ronmental PProtection

44

t and Conseal Water Qu

Urban DevW Dept. of E

uidelines. D009/806, D

s Sheet S1 5

rvice Stationnit, EPA 94

es. Enviro/59, Septem

Protection (Council, De

ervation Couuality Mana

velopment SEnvironment

Departmentecember, 20

56-2. Geolo

n Sites. En/119, Decem

onment Promber 1995.

(Assessmenecember 19

uncil, 2000gement Stra

Sites in NSWt and Conse

t of Environ009.

ogical Surve

nvironment mber 1994.

otection Au

t of Site Co999, Ammen

: Guidelinesategy, Octo

W, in Guideervation, DE

nment, Clim

ey of New S

Protection

uthority of

Contaminationdment 201

s for ber 2000.

elines for thEC, 2006.

mate Chang

South Wales

Authority o

New Sout

on) Measur3.

he

ge

s,

of

th

re


ABBRE AAS AHD AST ANZECB(a)P BGL BH BTEX COC DEC DECC DECCWDP DQO EI EIL EPA NSESA GC-ECDGC-FIDGC-MS HIL ICP-AESNATA NEPC NHMRCOCPs OEH PAHs PCBs PID PQL P&T QC RAC RAP RPD SILs SWL TP TPHs USEPA UST VOC UCL


EVIATION

AtomAustAbov

CC AustBenzBeloBoreBenzChemDepaDepa

W DepaDepoDataEnviEcol

SW EnviEnvi

D Gas D Gas

Gas Heal

S InduNatioNatio

C NatioOrgaOfficPolyPolyPhotPracPurgQualRemRemRelaSoil StanTest TotaUnitUndeVolaUppe


2nd May 2014

NS

mic Absorpttralian Heigveground Stralian and Nzo(a)Pyreneow Ground Lehole zene, Toluemical of Coartment of Eartment of Eartment of Eosited Plan a Quality Obironmental Ilogical Inveironment Prironmental ChromatogChromatogChromatoglth Based In

uctively Couonal Assocional Enviroonal Healthanochlorinece of Enviro

ycyclic Aromychlorinatedtoionisationtical Quanti

ge & Trap lity Control

mediation Acmediation Acative PercenInvestigatio

nding WaterPit

al Petroleumted States Energround Statile Organier Confiden

kville NSW 4

tion Spectroght Datum torage TankNew Zealane Level

ne, Ethyl beoncern EnvironmenEnvironmenEnvironmen

bjective Investigatio

estigation Lerotection AuSite Assessm

graph-Electrgraph-Flamegraph-Mass nvestigationuple Plasmaiation of Teonmental Prh and Medic Pesticidesonment andmatic Hydrod Biphenylsn Detector itation Limi

l cceptance Cction Plan

ntage Differeon Levels Test

m Hydrocarbnvironmenttorage Tankc Compoun

nce Limit

45

ometry

k nd Environm

enzene, Xyl

nt and Consnt and Climnt, Climate

ons evel uthority, Nement

ron Capturee Ionisation Spectromet

n Level a – Atomic Eesting Authorotection Cocal Research

d Heritage, Nocarbons

it

Criteria

ence

bons tal Protectiok nd

ment Conse

lene

servation, Nmate Change

Change and

ew South W

Detector Detector

ter

Emission Sporities, Austouncil h Council

NSW (form

on Agency

rvation Cou

NSW , NSW (form

d Water, NS

Wales

pectra tralia

merly DECC

uncil

rmerly DECSW (former

CW)

C) rly DECC)




2nd May 2014

kville NSW 4

46

FIGUREES

Mr John Francis Walsh

Stage 2 Environmental Site Assessment

110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville NSW

Site Locality Plan

Approved:

Approx Scale:

Date:

Drawn:

02-05-14

N.T.S

E.W.

1

Project: E22157 AA

Figure:

E.G.

Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009

Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088

SITE

SITE

0

Approx. Scale (m)

5 10 20 30

MW1/BH1

MW2/BH2

MW3/BH5

BH7

BH6

BH4

BH3


Environmental Site Assessment

110-112 Addison Road, Marrickville, NSW

Sampling Location Plan

Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street, PYRMONT 2009

Ph (02) 9516 0722 Fax (02) 9518 5088

Approved:

Approx Scale:

Date:

Drawn:

02-05-14

1:250 @ A3

E.W

2

Project: E22157 AA

Figure:

E.G

Approx. site boundary

Figure:

Map Source: Nearmaps 2014

LEGEND

Borehole location

Monitoring well/Borehole location




2nd May 2014

NR A

kville NSW 4

ATLAS GRO

47

APPENDIX

OUNDWAT

X A

TER BORE SEARCH




2nd May 2014

kville NSW 4

LAND

48

APPENDIX

D TITLES S

X B

SEARCH




2nd May 2014

kville NSW 4

NSW W

49

APPENDIX

WORKCOVE

X C

ER SEARCHH




2nd May 2014

QUAL

kville NSW 4

LITY ASSUR

50

APPENDIX

RANCE / Q

X D

QUALITY CCONTROL

QC Sample Type Method of Assessment Acceptable Range

Blind Duplicates andSplit Samples

The assessment of split duplicate is undertaken by calculating the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) of the duplicate concentration compared with the primary sample concentration. The RPD is defined as:

| X1 - X2 |

RPD = 100 x ___________________

mean ( X1, X2)

Where: X1 and X2 are the concentrationsof the primary and duplicate samples.

The acceptable range depends upon the levelsdetected:

- 0-150% RPD (when the average concentration is <5 times the LOR/PQL)

- 0-75% RPD (when the average concentration is 5 to 10 times the LOR/PQL)

- 0-50% RPD (when the average concentration is >10 times the LOR/PQL)

Rinsate &Trip Blanks

Each blank is analysed as per theoriginal samples.

Analytical Result <LOR/PQL

Laboratory preparedTrip Spike

The Trip Spike is analysed afterreturning from the field and the %

recovery of the known spike iscalculated.

70 - 130%

Laboratory Duplicates Assessment of Lab Duplicate RPD as per Blind Duplicates andSplit Samples.

Lab Duplicate RPD < 15% (Inorganics) Lab Duplicate RPD < 30% (Organics) for sample results > 10 LOR

Surrogates

Matrix Spikes Laboratory ControlSamples

Assessment is undertaken by determiningthe percent recovery of the known surrogate spike (SS) or addition to the sample.

C - A

% Recovery = 100 x _______________

B

Where: A = Concentration of analyte determinedin the original sample; B = Added Concentration; and C = Calculated Concentration.

at least 2 SS recoveries to be within 70-130% subject to matrix effects (Organics)

80-120% (Inorganics / Metals)60-140% (Organics)10-140% (SVOC and Speciated Phenols)

If the result is outside the above ranges, theresult must be <3x Standard Deviation of theHistorical Mean (calculated over the past12 months).

Sample Matrix Spike Duplicates

Recovery RPD <30% (Inorganics & Organics)

Calibration Check Standars Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV)CCV must be within ±15% (inorganics) CCV must be within ±25% (inorganics)

Reagent, Method & Calibration Check Blanks

Each blank is analysed as per theoriginal samples.

Analytical Result <LOR/PQL

Note: PQL - Laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) or the minimum detection limit for a particular analyte. LOR = Limit of Reporting

Table QC5 - QC Sample Data Acceptance Criteria

Field QC

Laboratory QC

QA/QC PLAN

Uncontrolled document when printed Ref:MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022 QA QC Plan.doc/ver.6/18.09.2008/Page 1 of 3

AUSTRALIA - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - MANAGEMENT PLAN

QA QC PLAN

Approved: T. Pilbeam

SGS Environmental Services is accredited by NATA for Chemical Testing (Reg.No.2562) and Quality System compliance to ISO/IEC 17025. The QC parameters contained within are designed to meet NEPM 1999 requirements. Quality Control samples included in any analytical run are listed below.

Reagent/Analysis Blank (BLK)

Method Blank (MB)

Sample free reagents carried through the preparation/extraction/digestion procedure and analysed at the beginning of every sample batch analysis. A reagent blank is prepared and analysed with every batch of samples plus with each new batch of solvent prior to use.

Sample Matrix Spike (MS) & Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)

Sample replicates spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s). The spiking occurs during the sample preparation and prior to the extraction/digestion procedure. They are used to document the precision and bias of a method in a given sample matrix. Where there is not enough sample available to prepare a spiked sample, another known soil/sand or water may be used. A duplicate spiked sample is analysed at least every 20 samples.

Surrogate Spike (SS) At least one but up to three surrogate compounds are added to all samples requiring analysis for organics prior to extraction. Used to determine the extraction efficiency. They are organic compounds which are similar to the target analyte(s) in chemical composition and behaviour in the analytical process, but which are not normally found in environmental samples. Where possible they are surrogate compounds recommended by the USEPA.

Control Matrix Spike (CMS)

To ensure spike recoveries can be determined for every batch of samples a control matrix is spiked with identical concentrations of target analyte(s) and then analysed. These results allow recoveries to be determined in the event that the matrix spikes are unusable (eg. matrix spikes performed on heavily contaminated samples). These are analysed at least every 20 samples.

Internal Standard (IS) Added to all samples requiring analysis for organics (where relevant) after the extraction process; the compounds serve to give a standard of retention time and response, which is invariant from run-to-run with the instruments. Where possible they are standard compounds recommended by the USEPA.

Lab Duplicates (D) A separate portion of a sample being analysed that is treated the same as the other samples in the batch. One duplicate is processed at least every 10 samples.

Lab Control Standards/Samples (LCS)

Prepared from a source independent of the calibration standards. At least one control standard is included in each run to confirm calibration validity. Thereafter they are analysed at least every one in 20 samples plus at the end of each analytical run. This data is not reported.

Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV) or

Calibration Check Standard & Blank

A calibration check standard or CCV and blank are run after every 20 samples of an instrumental analysis run to assess analytical drift.

Calibration Standards are checked old versus new with a criteria of ±10%

QA/QC PLAN



QA QC PLAN


Quality Assurance Programs are listed below:

Statistical analysis of Quality Control data (SQC)

Quality control data is plotted on control charts using the APHA procedure with warning and control limits at 2 and 3 standard deviations respectively. See also QMS Procedure “Statistical Quality Control”.

Certified Reference Materials (CRM/SRM)

Certified Reference Materials and Standards are regularly analysed. These materials/standards have certified reference values for various parameters.

Proficiency Testing

Regular proficiency test samples are analysed by our laboratories. SGS Environmental participates in a number of programs. Results and proficiency status are compiled and sent to participating laboratory post data interpretation. Failure to comply with acceptable values result in further investigations.

Inter-laboratory & Intra-laboratory Testing

SGS Environmental Services has schedules in the Quality Systems to participate in Inter/Intra laboratory testing conducted internally and by other parties.

Data Acceptance Criteria

Unless otherwise specified in

the method or method manual

the following general criteria

apply to all inorganic tests.

All recoveries are to be

reported to 3 significant

figures.

Failure to meet the internal acceptance criteria will result in sample batch repeats dependent upon investigation outcomes. For data to be accepted:

Inorganics (water samples)

• For all inorganic analytes the Reagent & Method Blanks must be less than the LOR.

• The Calibration Check Standards or Continuous Calibration Verification (CCV) must be within

+15%.

• Control Standards must be 80-120% of the accepted value.

• The Calibration Check Blanks must be less than the LOR.

• Lab Duplicates RPD to be <15%*. Note: If client field duplicates do not meet this criteria it may indicate heterogeneity and shall be noted on the data reports for QC samples.

• Sample (and if applicable Control) Matrix Spike� Duplicate recovery RPD to be <30%.

• Where CRMs are used, results to be within + 2 standard deviations of

the expected value.

Inorganics (soil samples)

• For all inorganic analytes the Reagent & Method Blanks must be less than the LOR.


+15%.

• Control Standards must be 80-120% of the accepted value.

• The Calibration Check Blanks must be less than the LOR.

• Lab duplicate RPD to be <30%* for sample results greater than 10 times LOR.

• Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS�/MSD) recovery RPD to be <30%. In the event that the matrix spike has been applied to samples whose matrix or contamination is problematic to the method then these acceptance criteria apply to the Control Matrix Spike (CMS/D).

• Where CRMs are used, results to be within ± 2 standard deviations of the expected value.

QA/QC PLAN



QA QC PLAN


Data Acceptance Criteria

Unless otherwise specified in

the method or method manual

the following general criteria

apply to all organic tests.

All recoveries are to be

reported to 3 significant

figures.

Organics

• Volatile & extractable Reagent & Method Blanks must contain levels less than or equal to LOR.


+25%. Some analytes may have

specific criteria.

• Control Standards (LCS/CMS) and Certified Reference Materials (CRM) recoveries are to be within established control limits or as a default 60-140% unless compound specific limits apply.

• Retention times are to vary by no more than 0.2 min.

• At least two of three routine level soil sample Surrogate Spike (SS) recoveries are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as acceptance criterion. Any recoveries outside these limits will have comment.

• Water sample Surrogates Spike (SS) recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions, surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion. Any recoveries outside these limits will have comment.

• Lab Duplicates (D) must have a RPD <30%*.

• Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS�/MSD) recovery RPD to be <30%. In the event that the matrix spike has been applied to samples whose matrix or contamination is problematic to the method then these acceptance criteria apply to the Control Matrix Spike (CMS/D).

*Only i f resu l t s are a t leas t 10 t imes the LOR otherwise no acceptance c r i te r ia fo r RPD’s app ly . App l i ca t ion o f more s t r ingent c r i te r ia sha l l be app l ied for c lean water sample f rom water boards and any o ther nom inated c l ien t cont rac ts . Nom ina l 10xLOR c r i te r ia are dropped to 5xLOR where spec i f ied . �

Mat r ix do not read i l y equate to def in i t i ve recovery due to inherent mat r i x in ter ferences and thus do not

have recovery compl iance va lues set . As a gu ide inorgan ic recover ies shou ld be between 70-130% and for organ ics 60-130%

Batch Structure Summary An analytical batch is nominally considered as 20 samples or smaller. As a standard template the following should be used as a guide according to the above Quality Control Types:

1 MB 16 UNK_DUP 2 STD1 17 MS 3 STD2 18 MS_DUP 4 STD3 19 UNK 11

5 LCS 20 UNK 12

6 BLK 21 UNK 13

7 UNK 1 22 UNK 14

8 UNK 2 23 UNK 15

9 UNK 3 24 UNK 16

10 UNK 4 25 UNK 17

11 UNK 5 26 UNK 18

12 UNK 6 27 UNK 19

13 UNK 7 28 UNK 20 (SS if applicable) 14 UNK 8 29 UNK_DUP 15 UNK 9 30 CCV 16 UNK 10 (SS if applicable) 31 CRM / SRM / CMS / LCS




2nd May 2014

kville NSW 4

BO

51

APPENDIX

OREHOLE

X E

LOGS

-

-

F

VSt

F

0.20

0.50

2.30

6.50

8.00

-

-

M

M

W

-

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.50

2.30

6.50

Concrete Slab: Approx. 200mm thick.

FILL: Sand, coarse grained, yellow with traces of gravel, noodour.

Silty CLAY, low to medium plasticity orange, with red mottling,no odour.

Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, grey with red mottling,no odour.

Silty CLAY, low plasticity, pale gray, no odour.

Hole Terminated at 8.00 mTarget depth reached, converted in to a monitoring well

-

CI-ML

CI-CH

CL

BH1-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.8 ppm

BH1-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm

BH1-3 ES3.50-3.60 mPID = 0 ppm

14/0

5/14

Gatic cover inConcrete

Sand

50mm uPVCCasing

Bentonite

Sand50mm uPVCScreen

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD

Field Material DescriptionSamplingDrilling

WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre

s) SOIL/ROCK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST

TEST: BH1/MW1Environmental Site Assessment


Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART

Drill Rig Ute Mounted Rig

Inclination -90°

This borehole log should be read in conjunction with Environmental Investigations Australia's accompanying standard notes.

Sheet 1 OF 1

Date Started 11/4/14

Date Completed 11/4/14

Logged EW Date: 2/4/14

Checked EG Date: 2/4/14

EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

5 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17

PIEZOMETER DETAILSID

MW1

Static Water Level

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MW

1

-

-

F

VSt

F

0.20

0.50

2.30

6.50

8.00

-

-

M

M

W

-

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.50

2.30

6.50







-

CI-ML

CI-CH

CL

BH2-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.5 ppm

BH2-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm

BH2-3 ES3.50-3.60 mPID = 0 ppm

14/0

5/14


Sand

50mm uPVCCasing

Bentonite

Sand50mm uPVCScreen

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD


WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre


US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST



Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART


Inclination -90°


Sheet 1 OF 1





EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

5 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17


MW2

Static Water Level

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MW

2

-

-

St

0.20

0.40

2.00

-

-

M

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.40


FILL: Silty CLAY, low plasticity, brown with traces ofsandstone gravel, no odour.


Hole Terminated at 2.00 mTarget depth reached, backfrilled with drilling spoil.

-

CI-CH

BH3-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.5 ppm

BH3-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm

BH3-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD


WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre


US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST

TEST: BH3Environmental Site Assessment


Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART


Inclination -90°


Sheet 1 OF 1





EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

5 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17

STRUCTURE ANDADDITIONAL

OBSERVATIONS

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

-

-

St

0.20

0.40

2.00

-

-

M

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.40


FILL: Gravelly Sand, medium grained, dark brown, with slighthydrocarbon odour.

Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, orange with redmottling, no odour.


-

CI-CH

BH4-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.4 ppm

BH4-2 ES0.70-0.80 mPID = 0 ppm

BH4-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD


WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre


US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST



Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART


Inclination -90°


Sheet 1 OF 1





EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

5 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17


OBSERVATIONS

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

-

-

F

VSt

F

0.20

0.50

2.30

6.50

8.00

-

-

M

M

W

-

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.50

2.30

6.50







-

CI-ML

CI-CH

CL

BH5-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.2 ppm

BH5-2 ES0.60-0.70 mPID = 0 ppm

BH5-3 ES3.50-3.60 mPID = 0 ppm

14/0

5/14


Sand

50mm uPVCCasing

Bentonite

Sand50mm uPVCScreen

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD


WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre


US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST



Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART


Inclination -90°


Sheet 1 OF 1





EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

5 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17


MW3

Static Water Level

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MW

3

-

-

St

VSt

0.20

0.40

1.20

2.00

-

-

M

M

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.40

1.20


FILL: Clayey Sand, dark brown, medium grained, with gracesof gravel, no odour.

Silty CLAY, medium plasticity, brown with red mottling, noodour.

Silty CLAY, high plasticity, grey with red mottling, no odour.


-

CI

CH

BH6-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 0.8 ppm

BH6-2 ES0.50-0.60 mPID = 0 ppm

BH6-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD


WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre


US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST



Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART


Inclination -90°


Sheet 1 OF 1





EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

5 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17


OBSERVATIONS

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

-

-

St

VSt

0.20

0.40

1.20

2.00

-

-

M

M

DT

AD

/T

0.20

0.40

1.20


FILL: Clayey Sand, medium grained, dark brown with tracesof gravel, no odour.

Silty CLAY, medium plasticity, brown, no odour.

Silty CLAY, medium to high plasticity, no odour.


-

CI

CI-CH

BH7-1 ES0.20-0.30 mPID = 1.5 ppm

BH7-2 ES0.70-0.80 mPID = 0 ppm

BH7-3 ES1.90-2.00 mPID = 0 ppm

CO

NS

IST

EN

CY

DE

NS

ITY

GR

AP

HIC

LOG

PE

NE

TR

AT

ION

RE

SIS

TA

NC

E

RE

CO

VE

RE

D

ME

TH

OD


WA

TE

R

RLDEPTH

DE

PT

H(m

etre


US

CS

SY

MB

OL

MO

IST

UR

EC

ON

DIT

ION

SAMPLE ORFIELD TEST



Refer to figure 2

E22157 AA


Project

Location

Position

Job No.

Client

Contractor GEOHART


Inclination -90°


Sheet 1 OF 1





EIA

LIB

1.0

1.G

LB

Log

IS

AU

BO

RE

HO

LE 3

E

2215

7 A

A B

OR

EH

OLE

LO

GS

.GP

J <

<Dra

win

gFile

>>

02/

05/2

014

16:2

6 8

.30.

003

Dat

gel

Lab

and

In S

itu

Too

l -

DG

D |

Lib

: E

IA 1

.01

2014

-01-

15 P

rj: E

IA 1

.01.

1 20

14-0

1-17


OBSERVATIONS

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0



SAMPL


2nd May 2014

LE RECEIP

kville NSW 4

PT ADVICE

52

APPENDIX

E & CHAIN

X F

N-OF-CUSTOODY CERT

TIFICATESS

SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE

Client:

Environmental Investigations 9516 0722ph:

Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street 9518 5088Fax:

Pyrmont NSW 2009

Attention: Emmanuel Woelders

Sample log in details:

Your reference: E22157, Marrickville

Envirolab Reference: 108161

Date received: 14/04/14

Date results expected to be reported: 23/04/14

Samples received in appropriate condition for analysis: YES

No. of samples provided 1 Soil

Turnaround time requested: Standard

Temperature on receipt (°C) 18.3

Cooling Method: Ice Pack

Sampling Date Provided: YES

Comments:

If there is sufficient sample after testing, samples will be held for the following time frames from date of receipt of samples:

Water samples - 1 month

Soil and other solid samples - 2 months

Samples collected in canisters - 1 week. Canisters will then be cleaned.

All other samples are not retained after analysis

If you require samples to be retained for longer periods then retention fees will apply as per our pricelist.

Contact details:

Please direct any queries to Aileen Hie or Jacinta Hurst

ph: 02 9910 6200 fax: 02 9910 6201

email: [email protected] or [email protected]

Page 1 of 1

SAMPLE RECEIPT ADVICE SE126867

CLIENT DETAILS

02 9516 0741

Email Email

Address

Project

Order Number

SGS Reference SE126867

E22157

E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd -Marrickville

Client

Contact

Environmental Investigations

Administration Manager

Address Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street

NSW 2009

LABORATORY DETAILS

Laboratory

Manager

Telephone

Facsimile

Report Due Tue 22/4/2014

Facsimile

Telephone

Samples 4

02 9516 0722

[email protected]

Samples Received

SGS Alexandria Environmental

Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]

Unit 16, 33 Maddox St

Alexandria NSW 2015

Tue 15/4/2014

SUBMISSION DETAILS

This is to confirm that 4 samples were received on Tuesday 15/4/2014. Results are expected to be ready by Tuesday 22/4/2014. Please quote

SGS reference SE126867 when making enquiries. Refer below for details relating to sample integrity upon receipt.

Sample counts by matrix 4 Waters Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 15/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.7°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes

Samples will be held for one month for water samples and two months for soil samples from date of report, unless otherwise instructed.

COMMENTS

To the extent not inconsistent with the other provisions of this document and unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing by SGS, all SGS services are rendered in

accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at

http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx as at the date of this document.

Attention is drawn to the limitations of liability and to the clauses of indemnification.

Member of the SGS Group

www.au.sgs.comf +61 2 8594 0499t +61 2 8594 0400Australia

Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015

Unit 16 33 Maddox St

PO Box 6432 Bourke Rd BC

Environmental ServicesSGS Australia Pty Ltd

ABN 44 000 964 278


CLIENT DETAILS

E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd -MarrickvilleEnvironmental Investigations ProjectClient

SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS

Me

rcu

ry (

dis

so

lve

d)

in

Wa

ter

PA

H (

Po

lyn

ucle

ar

Aro

ma

tic H

yd

roca

rbo

ns)

in

Tra

ce M

eta

ls (

Dis

so

lve

d)

in W

ate

r b

y I

CP

MS

TR

H (

To

tal R

eco

ve

rab

le

Hyd

roca

rbo

ns)

in W

ate

r

VO

Cs

in W

ate

r

Vo

latil

e P

etr

ole

um

Hyd

roca

rbo

ns in

Wa

ter

001 GW1-1 1 22 7 9 12 8

002 GW2-1 1 22 7 9 12 8

003 GW3-1 1 22 7 9 12 8

004 GW-B1 1 - 7 9 12 8

No. Sample ID

The above table represents SGS Environmental Services' interpretation of the client-supplied Chain Of Custody document.

The numbers shown in the table indicate the number of results requested in each package.

Please indicate as soon as possible should your request differ from these details.

Testing as per this table shall commence immediately unless the client intervenes with a correction.

Page 2 of 216/04/2014


CLIENT DETAILS

02 9516 0741

Email Email

Address

Project

Order Number

SGS Reference SE126807

E22157

E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-Marrickville

Client

Contact


Administration Manager

Address Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street

NSW 2009

LABORATORY DETAILS

Laboratory

Manager

Telephone

Facsimile

Report Due Thu 17/4/2014

Facsimile

Telephone

Samples 13

02 9516 0722

[email protected]

Samples Received


Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]


Alexandria NSW 2015

Mon 14/4/2014

SUBMISSION DETAILS

This is to confirm that 13 samples were received on Monday 14/4/2014. Results are expected to be ready by Thursday 17/4/2014. Please quote

SGS reference SE126807 when making enquiries. Refer below for details relating to sample integrity upon receipt.

Sample counts by matrix 12 Soils & 1 Water Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 14/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.6°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes

10 soil samples, which were not marked for analyses on the COC, have been placed on hold. These samples will not be processed.

Samples will be held for one month for water samples and two months for soil samples from date of report, unless otherwise instructed.

COMMENTS

To the extent not inconsistent with the other provisions of this document and unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing by SGS, all SGS services are rendered in

accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at

http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx as at the date of this document.

Attention is drawn to the limitations of liability and to the clauses of indemnification.



Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015




ABN 44 000 964 278


CLIENT DETAILS

E22157- 110-112 Addison Rd-MarrickvilleEnvironmental Investigations ProjectClient

SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS

OC

Pe

stic

ide

s in

So

il

OP

Pe

stic

ide

s in

So

il

PA

H (

Po

lyn

ucle

ar

Aro

ma

tic H

yd

roca

rbo

ns)

in

PC

Bs

in S

oil

To

tal R

eco

ve

rab

le M

eta

ls

in S

oil

by I

CP

OE

S f

rom

TR

H (

To

tal R

eco

ve

rab

le

Hyd

roca

rbo

ns)

in S

oil

VO

C’s

in S

oil

Vo

latil

e P

etr

ole

um

Hyd

roca

rbo

ns in

So

il

001 BH1-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

002 BH1-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8

003 BH2-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

004 BH2-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8

005 BH3-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

006 BH4-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

007 BH4-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8

008 BH5-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

009 BH6-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

010 BH6-2 - - 23 - 7 9 12 8

011 BH7-1 28 13 23 11 7 9 12 8

012 B1 - - - - 7 9 12 8

No. Sample ID

CONTINUED OVERLEAF





Page 2 of 414/04/2014


CLIENT DETAILS


SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS

Fib

re I

de

ntif

ica

tion

in s

oil

Me

rcu

ry in

So

il

Mo

istu

re C

on

ten

t

TR

H (

To

tal R

eco

ve

rab

le

Hyd

roca

rbo

ns)

in W

ate

r

VO

Cs

in W

ate

r

Vo

latil

e P

etr

ole

um

Hyd

roca

rbo

ns in

Wa

ter

001 BH1-1 2 1 1 - - -

002 BH1-2 - 1 1 - - -

003 BH2-1 2 1 1 - - -

004 BH2-2 - 1 1 - - -

005 BH3-1 2 1 1 - - -

006 BH4-1 2 1 1 - - -

007 BH4-2 - 1 1 - - -

008 BH5-1 2 1 1 - - -

009 BH6-1 2 1 1 - - -

010 BH6-2 - 1 1 - - -

011 BH7-1 2 1 1 - - -

012 B1 - 1 1 - - -

013 R1 - - - 9 12 8

No. Sample ID

CONTINUED OVERLEAF





Page 3 of 414/04/2014


CLIENT DETAILS


SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS

Me

rcu

ry (

dis

so

lve

d)

in

Wa

ter

Tra

ce M

eta

ls (

Dis

so

lve

d)

in W

ate

r b

y I

CP

MS

013 R1 1 7

No. Sample ID





Page 4 of 414/04/2014




2nd May 2014

LA

kville NSW 4

ABORATOR

53

APPENDIX

RY ANALYT

X G

TICAL REPPORTS

SE126867 R0

Date Reported

0000080723Report Number

Contact



Alexandria NSW 2015

Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]

4

SGS Reference

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Manager

Laboratory

E22157


[email protected]

02 9516 0741

02 9516 0722

Suite 6.01, 55 Miller Street

NSW 2009


Emmanuel Woelders

Samples

Order Number

Project

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Client

CLIENT DETAILS LABORATORY DETAILS

22 Apr 2014

STATEMENT OF QA/QC

PERFORMANCE

SE126867 R0

COMMENTS

All the laboratory data for each environmental matrix was compared to SGS Environmental Services' stated

Data Quality Objectives (DQO). Comments arising from the comparison were made and are reported below.

The data relating to sampling was taken from the Chain of Custody document and was supplied by the Client.

This QA/QC Statement must be read in conjunction with the referenced Analytical Report.

The Statement and the Analytical Report must not be reproduced except in full.

All Data Quality Objectives were met (within the SGS Alexandria Environmental laboratory).

Sample counts by matrix 4 Waters Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 15/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.7°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes

SAMPLE SUMMARY



Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015




ABN 44 000 964 278

Page 1 of 1022/4/2014

SE126867 R0

SGS holding time criteria are drawn from current regulations and are highly dependent on sample container preservation as specified in the SGS “Field Sampling Guide for

Containers and Holding Time” (ref: GU-(AU)-ENV.001). Soil samples guidelines are derived from NEPM "Schedule B(3) Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially

Contaminated Soils". Water sample guidelines are derived from "AS/NZS 5667.1 : 1998 Water Quality - sampling part 1" and APHA "Standard Methods for the Examination

of Water and Wastewater" 21st edition 2005.

Extraction and analysis holding time due dates listed are calculated from the date sampled, although holding times may be extended after laboratory extraction for some

analytes. The due dates are the suggested dates that samples may be held before extraction or analysis and still be considered valid.

Extraction and analysis dates are shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria. If the sampled

date is not supplied then compliance with criteria cannot be determined. If the received date is after one or both due dates then holding time will fail by default.

HOLDING TIME SUMMARY

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312Mercury (dissolved) in Water

Sample No.Sample Name QC Ref Sampled Received Extraction Due Extracted Analysis Due Analysed

GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056229 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014



GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056229 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014 12 May 2014 22 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water


GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014



GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056047 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 21 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014 26 May 2014 22 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS


GW1-1 SE126867.001 LB056051 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 17 Apr 2014



GW-B1 SE126867.004 LB056051 14 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014 11 Oct 2014 17 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water






Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water






Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water






22/4/2014 Page 2 of 10

SE126867 R0

Surrogate results are evaluated against upper and lower limit criteria established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). At least two of three routine level soil

sample surrogate spike recoveries for BTEX/VOC are to be within 70-130% where control charts have not been developed and within the established control limits for charted

surrogates. Matrix effects may void this as an acceptance criterion. Water sample surrogate spike recoveries are to be within 40-130%. The presence of emulsions,

surfactants and particulates may void this as an acceptance criterion.

Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end

of this report for failure reasons.

SURROGATES

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water

UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter Criteria Recovery %

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 70

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 70

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 76

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 80

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 84

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 92

d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 74

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 70

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 80



Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 77

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 78

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 74

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 75

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 119

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 122

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 122

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 117

d8-toluene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 89

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 93

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 87

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 91

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 40 - 130% 121

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 40 - 130% 118

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 40 - 130% 119

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 40 - 130% 115



Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 77

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 78

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 74

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 75

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 119

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 122

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 122

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 117

d8-toluene (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 89

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 93

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 87

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 91

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) GW1-1 SE126867.001 % 60 - 130% 121

GW2-1 SE126867.002 % 60 - 130% 118

GW3-1 SE126867.003 % 60 - 130% 119

GW-B1 SE126867.004 % 60 - 130% 115

22/4/2014 Page 3 of 10

SE126867 R0

Blank results are evaluated against the limit of reporting (LOR), for the chosen method and its associated instrumentation, typically 2.5 times the statistically determined

method detection limit (MDL).

Result is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.

METHOD BLANKS

Mercury (dissolved) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312

Sample Number Parameter Units LOR Result

LB056229.001 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001

LB056229.025 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001

PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420


LB056047.001 Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

2-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

1-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Fluorene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Chrysene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(ghi)perylene µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) % - 98

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 96

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) % - 104

Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318


LB056051.001 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 <1

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 <1

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5





Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1


Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5

TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403


LB056047.001 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50

TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200

TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200

TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200

VOCs in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434


LB056062.001 Monocyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons

Benzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5

Toluene µg/L 0.5 <0.5

Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 <0.5

m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1

o-xylene µg/L 0.5 <0.5

Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5

Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) % - 106

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) % - 111

d8-toluene (Surrogate) % - 101

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) % - 80

22/4/2014 Page 4 of 10

SE126867 R0




METHOD BLANKS

Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410


LB056062.001 TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40





22/4/2014 Page 5 of 10

SE126867 R0

Duplicates are calculated as Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean

The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit

(SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR

Where the Maximum Allowable Difference evaluates to a number larger than 200 it is displayed as 200.

RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of

this report for failure reasons.

DUPLICATES


UnitsParameterOriginal LORDuplicate Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %

SE126781.004 LB056051.014 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 -0.003 -0.014 200 0

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.005 0.004 200 0

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 0.174 0.182 200 0

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 0.582 0.558 190 0

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 1.188 0.972 108 17

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 -0.312 -0.332 200 0

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 2.305 2.05 200 0

SE126867.003 LB056051.028 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 0.2 0.2 65 0

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 2 2 76 2

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 10 10 25 5

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 55 56 24 2


Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0


Copper, Cu µg/L 1 1 1 112 1

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 200 0

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 2 2 74 5

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 12 12 58 1

22/4/2014 Page 6 of 10

SE126867 R0

Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) results are evaluated against an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into the control during the sample

preparation stage, producing a percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA /QC plan (Ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For

more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.

Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended dagger symbol (†) when outside suggested criteria.

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES

PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420

LORUnitsParameterSample Number Result Expected Criteria % Recovery %

LB056047.002 Naphthalene µg/L 0.1 38 40 60 - 140 95

Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.1 40 40 60 - 140 99

Acenaphthene µg/L 0.1 46 40 60 - 140 114

Phenanthrene µg/L 0.1 36 40 60 - 140 89

Anthracene µg/L 0.1 36 40 60 - 140 89

Fluoranthene µg/L 0.1 34 40 60 - 140 85

Pyrene µg/L 0.1 40 40 60 - 140 101

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.1 41 40 60 - 140 103

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 82

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 82

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) µg/L - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 78



LB056051.002 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 95

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 102

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 100

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 101

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 20 20 80 - 120 102

LB056051.026 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 94

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 102

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 103

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 100

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 99

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 104

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 20 20 80 - 120 101



LB056047.002 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 1200 1200 60 - 140 96

TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 97

TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 100

TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 1100 1200 60 - 140 95

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 1200 1200 60 - 140 99

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 620 600 60 - 140 104



LB056062.002 Monocyclic

Aromatic

Benzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115

Toluene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116

Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115

m/p-xylene µg/L 1 100 90.9 60 - 140 115

o-xylene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116

Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 93

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) µg/L - 4.7 5 60 - 140 95

d8-toluene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.0 5 60 - 140 101

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) µg/L - 5.4 5 60 - 140 109



LB056062.002 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 1000 946.63 60 - 140 110

TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 850 818.71 60 - 140 104





VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 730 639.67 60 - 140 114

22/4/2014 Page 7 of 10

SE126867 R0

Matrix Spike (MS) results are evaluated as the percentage recovery of an expected result, typically the concentration of analyte spiked into a field sub -sample during the

sample preparation stage. The original sample's result is subtracted from the sub -sample result before determining the percentage recovery. The criteria applied to the

percentage recovery is established in the SGS QA/QC plan (ref: MP-(AU)-[ENV]QU-022). For more information refer to the footnotes in the concluding page of this report.

Recovery is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the

end of this report for failure reasons.

MATRIX SPIKES


QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Result Original Spike Recovery%

SE126758.001 LB056051.004 Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 <0.1 20 98

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 19 <1 20 94

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 22 2 20 98

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 19 <1 20 93

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 25 <5 20 102

22/4/2014 Page 8 of 10

SE126867 R0

Matrix spike duplicates are calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean

The original result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike. The Duplicate result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike duplicate.

The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit (SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR


RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of this report for failure reasons.

MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES

No matrix spike duplicates were required for this job.

22/4/2014 Page 9 of 10

SE126867 R0FOOTNOTES

Samples analysed as received.

Solid samples expressed on a dry weight basis.

QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QA/QC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:

http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf

① At least 2 of 3 surrogates are within acceptance criteria.

② RPD failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.

③ Results less than 5 times LOR preclude acceptance criteria for RPD.

④ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to matrix interference.

⑤ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to the presence of significant concentration of analyte (i.e. the

concentration of analyte exceeds the spike level).

⑥ LOR was raised due to sample matrix interference.

⑦ LOR was raised due to dilution of significantly high concentration of analyte in sample.

⑧ Reanalysis of sample in duplicate confirmed sample heterogeneity and inconsistency of results.

⑨ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.

⑩ LOR was raised due to high conductivity of the sample (required dilution).

† Refer to Analytical Report comments for further information.

*

-

^

IS

LNR

LOR

QFH

QFL

Non-accredited analysis.

Sample not analysed for this analyte.

Analysis performed by external laboratory.

Insufficient sample for analysis.

Sample listed, but not received.

Limit of reporting.

QC result is above the upper tolerance.

QC result is below the lower tolerance.

This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service, available on request and accessible at

http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx . The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of

liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained herein reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and

within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a

transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.

This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full.

22/4/2014 Page 10 of 10

Date Reported


Contact



Alexandria NSW 2015

Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]

4

SGS Reference

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Manager

Laboratory

E22157


[email protected]

02 9516 0741

02 9516 0722


NSW 2009


Emmanuel Woelders

Samples

Order Number

Project

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Client


22/4/2014

ANALYTICAL REPORT

SE126867 R0

Date Received 15/4/2014

COMMENTS

TRACE METALS: The Limit of Reporting (LOR) has been raised for sample #1 due to interferences from the sample matrix.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. NATA accredited laboratory 2562(4354).

Andy Sutton

Senior Organic Chemist

Huong Crawford

Production Manager

Jaimie Cheung

Metals Chemist

Ly Kim Ha

Organic Section Head

SIGNATORIES



Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015




ABN 44 000 964 278

SE126867 R0ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCs in Water [AN433/AN434]

GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1

WATER WATER WATER WATER

14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00

SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004

Benzene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Toluene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

m/p-xylene µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1

o-xylene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Total Xylenes µg/L 1.50 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5 <1.5

Total BTEX µg/L 3.0 <3 <3 <3 <3

Naphthalene µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 2 of 822/04/2014


Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water [AN433/AN434/AN410]

GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1


14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00

SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004

TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40 <40 <40 <40

Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 3 of 822/04/2014


TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN403]

GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1


14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00

SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004

TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50

TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200

TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200

TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200 <200 <200 <200

TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60 <60 <60 <60

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500 <500

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500 <500 <500 <500

TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450 <450 <450 <450

TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650 <650 <650 <650

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 4 of 822/04/2014


PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN420]

GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1

WATER WATER WATER

14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00

SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003

Naphthalene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

2-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

1-methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Fluorene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Phenanthrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 0.2 <0.1

Anthracene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Pyrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)anthracene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Chrysene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Benzo(ghi)perylene µg/L 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Total PAH (18) µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 5 of 822/04/2014


Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS [AN318]

GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1


14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00

SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004

Arsenic, As µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.10 <1.0↑ <0.1 0.2 <0.1

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1

Copper, Cu µg/L 1.0 4 1 2 1

Lead, Pb µg/L 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1.0 <2↑ 2 10 2

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5.0 17 10 55 12

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 6 of 822/04/2014


Mercury (dissolved) in Water [AN311/AN312]

GW1-1 GW2-1 GW3-1 GW-B1


14/4/14 12:00 14/4/14 13:00 14/4/14 14:00 14/4/14 14:00

SE126867.001 SE126867.002 SE126867.003 SE126867.004

Mercury mg/L 0.00010 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 7 of 822/04/2014

SE126867 R0METHOD SUMMARY

METHOD METHODOLOGY SUMMARY

Unpreserved water sample is filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and acidified with nitric acid similar to

APHA3030B.

AN020

Separatory funnels are used for aqueous samples and extracted by transferring an appropriate volume (mass) of

liquid into a separatory funnel and adding 3 serial aliquots of dichloromethane. Samples receive a single extraction

at pH 7 to recover base / neutral analytes and two extractions at pH < 2 to recover acidic analytes. QC samples

are prepared by spiking organic free water with target analytes and extracting as per samples.

AN083

Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Waters: Mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution

to elemental mercury. This mercury vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption

spectrometer or mercury analyser. Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration

standards. Reference APHA 3112/3500.

AN311/AN312

Determination of elements at trace level in waters by ICP-MS technique, in accordance with USEPA 6020A.AN318

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons: Determination of Hydrocarbons by gas chromatography after a solvent

extraction. Detection is by flame ionisation detector (FID) that produces an electronic signal in proportion to the

combustible matter passing through it. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) are routinely reported as four

alkane groupings based on the carbon chain length of the compounds: C6-C9, C10-C14, C15-C28 and C29-C36

and in recognition of the Draft NEPM 2011, >C10-C16 (F2), >C16-C34 (F3) and >C34-C40 (F4). F2 is not

corrected for Naphthalene.

AN403

(SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH, Phthalates and Speciated Phenols (etc) in soils, sediments

and waters are determined by GCMS/ECD technique following appropriate solvent extraction process (Based on

USEPA 3500C and 8270D).

AN420

VOCs and C6-C9 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is

presented to a gas chromatograph via a purge and trap (P&T) concentrator and autosampler and is detected with

a Mass Spectrometer (MSD). Solid samples are initially extracted with methanol whilst liquid samples are

processed directly. References: USEPA 5030B, 8020A, 8260.

AN433/AN434





AN433/AN434/AN410

FOOTNOTES

*

**

^

Analysis not covered by the

scope of accreditation.

Indicative data, theoretical

holding time exceeded.

Performed by outside

laboratory.

-

NVL

IS

LNR

Not analysed.

Not validated.





Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.

The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:

http://www.sgs.com.au.pv.sgsv3/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf

This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service available on request and accessible at

http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of


Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only

and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to

a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.

This report must not be reproduced, except in full.

UOM

LOR

↑↓

Unit of Measure.

Limit of Reporting.

Raised/lowered Limit of

Reporting.

Page 8 of 822/04/2014

Date Reported


Contact



Alexandria NSW 2015

Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]

13

SGS Reference

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Manager

Laboratory

E22157


[email protected]

02 9516 0741

02 9516 0722


NSW 2009


Emmanuel Woelders

Samples

Order Number

Project

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Client


COMMENTS

17 Apr 2014

ANALYTICAL REPORT

SE126807 R0

Date Received 14 Apr 2014

No respirable fibres detected in all samples using trace analysis technique.

A portion of the sample supplied has been sub-sampled for asbestos according to SGS In-house procedures.

We therefore cannot guarantee that the sub-sample is representative of the entire sample supplied.

SGS Environmental Services recommends supplying approximately 50-100g of sample in a separate container.

Asbestos analysed by Approved Identifier Yusuf Kuthpudin and Ravee Sivasubramaniam.


SIGNATORIES

Andy Sutton


Huong Crawford

Production Manager

Jaimie Cheung

Metals Chemist

Kamrul Ahsan

Senior Chemist

Ly Kim Ha


Ravee Sivasubramaniam

Asbestos Analyst



Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015




ABN 44 000 964 278

Page 1 of 317/04/2014

SE126807 R0ANALYTICAL REPORT

RESULTS

Method AN602Fibre Identification in soil

Est.%w/wFibre IdentificationClient

Reference

Laboratory

ReferenceMatrix Date Sampled

Sample

Description

No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014370g clay, sand,

rocks

SoilBH1-1SE126807.001

No Asbestos Found <0.0111 Apr 2014197g clay, soil,

rocks

SoilBH2-1SE126807.003


rocks

SoilBH3-1SE126807.005


rocks

SoilBH4-1SE126807.006


rocks

SoilBH5-1SE126807.008


rocks

SoilBH6-1SE126807.009


rocks

SoilBH7-1SE126807.011

Page 2 of 317/04/2014

SE126807 R0


METHOD SUMMARY

AN602 Qualitative identification of chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite in bulk samples by polarised light microscopy (PLM)

in conjunction with dispersion staining (DS). AS4964 provides the basis for this document. Unequivocal

identification of the asbestos minerals present is made by obtaining sufficient diagnostic `clues`, which provide a

reasonable degree of certainty, dispersion staining is a mandatory `clue` for positive identification. If sufficient

`clues` are absent, then positive identification of asbestos is not possible. This procedure requires removal of

suspect fibres/bundles from the sample which cannot be returned.

AN602 Fibres/material that cannot be unequivocably identified as one of the three asbestos forms, will be reported as

unknown mineral fibres (umf).

AN602 AS4964.2004 Method for the Qualitative Identification of Asbestos in Bulk Samples, Section 8.4, Trace Analysis

Criteria, Note 4 states:"Depending upon sample condition and fibre type, the detection limit of this technique has

been found to lie generally in the range of 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 parts by weight, equivalent to 1 to 0.1 g/kg."

FOOTNOTES

Amosite - Brown Asbestos

Chrysotile - White Asbestos

Crocidolite - Blue Asbestos

Amphiboles - Amosite and/or Crocidolite

This report does not comply with the analytical reporting recommendations in the Western Australian Department of Health Guidelines for the

Assessment and Remediation and Management of Asbestos Contaminated sites in Western Australia - May 2009.

Sampled by the client.

Where reported: 'Asbestos Detected': Asbestos detected by polarized light microscopy, including dispersion staining.

Where reported: 'No Asbestos Found': No Asbestos Found by polarized light microscopy, including dispersion staining.

Where reported: 'UMF Detected': Mineral fibres of unknown type detected by polarized light microscopy, including dispersion staining. Confirmation

by another independent analytical technique may be necessary.

Even after disintegration it can be very difficult, or impossible, to detect the presence of asbestos in some asbestos -containing bulk materials using

polarised light microscopy. This is due to the low grade or small length or diameter of asbestos fibres present in the material, or to the fact that very

fine fibres have been distributed intimately throughout the materials.

The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here :









NA - Not Analysed

LNR - Listed, Not Required

* - Not Accredited

** - Indicative data, theoretical holding time exceeded.

Page 3 of 317/04/2014

SE126807 R0

Date Reported


Contact



Alexandria NSW 2015

Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]

13

SGS Reference

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Manager

Laboratory

E22157


[email protected]

02 9516 0741

02 9516 0722


NSW 2009


Emmanuel Woelders

Samples

Order Number

Project

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Client


17 Apr 2014

STATEMENT OF QA/QC

PERFORMANCE

SE126807 R0

COMMENTS

All the laboratory data for each environmental matrix was compared to SGS Environmental Services' stated

Data Quality Objectives (DQO). Comments arising from the comparison were made and are reported below.

The data relating to sampling was taken from the Chain of Custody document and was supplied by the Client.

This QA/QC Statement must be read in conjunction with the referenced Analytical Report.

The Statement and the Analytical Report must not be reproduced except in full.

All Data Quality Objectives were met with the exception of the following:

LCS OC Pesticides in Soil 1 item

Sample counts by matrix 12 Soils & 1 Water Type of documentation received COCDate documentation received 14/4/2014 Samples received in good order YesSamples received without headspace Yes Sample temperature upon receipt 3.6°CSample container provider SGS Turnaround time requested Three DaysSamples received in correct containers Yes Sufficient sample for analysis YesSample cooling method Ice Bricks Samples clearly labelled YesComplete documentation received Yes

SAMPLE SUMMARY



Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015




ABN 44 000 964 278

Page 1 of 1917/4/2014

SE126807 R0










Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN602Fibre Identification in soil


BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055916 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 14 Apr 2014 11 Apr 2015 15 Apr 2014







Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN311/AN312Mercury (dissolved) in Water


R1 SE126807.013 LB056130 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 17 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 17 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312Mercury in Soil


BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014











B1 SE126807.012 LB055936 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 15 Apr 2014 09 May 2014 16 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002Moisture Content













B1 SE126807.012 LB055959 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 20 Apr 2014 16 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OC Pesticides in Soil


BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014











B1 SE126807.012 LB055923 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 25 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 24 May 2014 17 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OP Pesticides in Soil




17/4/2014 Page 2 of 19

SE126807 R0










Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OP Pesticides in Soil (continued)












Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil














Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420PCBs in Soil














Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest


BH1-1 SE126807.001 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014











B1 SE126807.012 LB055933 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN318Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS


R1 SE126807.013 LB055964 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 15 Apr 2014 08 Oct 2014 16 Apr 2014

17/4/2014 Page 3 of 19

SE126807 R0










Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil














Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water


R1 SE126807.013 LB055992 11 Apr 2014 14 Apr 2014 18 Apr 2014 15 Apr 2014 25 May 2014 17 Apr 2014

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOC’s in Soil

















Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil

















17/4/2014 Page 4 of 19

SE126807 R0







SURROGATES

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OC Pesticides in Soil


Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 124

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 128

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 127

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 123

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 119

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 125

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 129

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420OP Pesticides in Soil


2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 80

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 84

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 82

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 84

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 88

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 92

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 88

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 92

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 100

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 96

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil


2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 76

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 80

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 80

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 84

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 84

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 82

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 84

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 84

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 88

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 78

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 84

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 84

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 92

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 88

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 86

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 92

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 100

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 94

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 96

d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 86

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 82

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 86

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 84

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 84

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 88

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 80

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 80

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 88

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 82

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 84

17/4/2014 Page 5 of 19

SE126807 R0







SURROGATES

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420PCBs in Soil


Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 124

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 128

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 127

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 123

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 119

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 125

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 129

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOC’s in Soil


Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 93

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 88

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 88

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 80

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 97

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 88

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 84

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 83

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 93

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 95

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 97

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 93

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 95

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 101

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 101

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 86

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 93

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 85

d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 117

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 94

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 94

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 89

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 101

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 89

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 121

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 108

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 101

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 112

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 95

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 91

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 99

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 86

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 92

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 92

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 85

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 92

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 100

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 87

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 95

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 79


UnitsSample Name Sample NumberParameter

17/4/2014 Page 6 of 19

SE126807 R0







SURROGATES

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434VOCs in Water (continued)


Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 79

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 94

d8-toluene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 101

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 40 - 130% 121

Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil


Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 84

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 93

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 88

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 88

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 80

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 97

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 88

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 84

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 83

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 93

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 88

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 95

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 97

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 93

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 95

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 101

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 101

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 90

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 86

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 93

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 85

d8-toluene (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 117

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 94

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 94

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 89

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 101

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 89

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 121

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 108

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 101

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 112

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 95

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 91

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) BH1-1 SE126807.001 % 60 - 130% 99

BH1-2 SE126807.002 % 60 - 130% 86

BH2-1 SE126807.003 % 60 - 130% 92

BH2-2 SE126807.004 % 60 - 130% 92

BH3-1 SE126807.005 % 60 - 130% 85

BH4-1 SE126807.006 % 60 - 130% 92

BH4-2 SE126807.007 % 60 - 130% 100

BH5-1 SE126807.008 % 60 - 130% 95

BH6-1 SE126807.009 % 60 - 130% 87

BH6-2 SE126807.010 % 60 - 130% 95

BH7-1 SE126807.011 % 60 - 130% 88

B1 SE126807.012 % 60 - 130% 79



Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 79

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 94

d8-toluene (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 101

Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) R1 SE126807.013 % 60 - 130% 121

17/4/2014 Page 7 of 19

SE126807 R0




METHOD BLANKS



LB056130.001 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 <0.0001

Mercury in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN312


LB055936.001 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 <0.01

OC Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420


LB055923.001 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) % - 105

OP Pesticides in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420


LB055923.001 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5

Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5

Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5

Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5

Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 90


PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420


LB055923.001 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

17/4/2014 Page 8 of 19

SE126807 R0




METHOD BLANKS

PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420


LB055923.001 Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 <0.8

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) % - 84

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) % - 82


PCBs in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN400/AN420


LB055923.001 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2








Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1

Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) % - 105

Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN040/AN320


LB055933.001 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 <3

Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3

Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 <0.3

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 <0.5

Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 <1

Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 <0.5

Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 <0.5







Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1


Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 <5

TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403


LB055923.001 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100

TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110



LB055992.001 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50

TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200

TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200

TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200

VOC’s in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434

Sample Number Parameter Units LOR

17/4/2014 Page 9 of 19

SE126807 R0




METHOD BLANKS

VOC’s in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434



Hydrocarbons

Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2

o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1

Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1





Totals Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 <0.6




Hydrocarbons




m/p-xylene µg/L 1 <1


Polycyclic VOCs Naphthalene µg/L 0.5 <0.5





Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN433/AN434/AN410


LB055917.001 TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20






LB055969.001 TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40





17/4/2014 Page 10 of 19

SE126807 R0







DUPLICATES



SE126807.010 LB055936.014 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 0.01 0.02 200 0

SE126816.001 LB055936.018 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 <0.05 0.05 134 5

Moisture Content Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN002


SE126807.010 LB055959.011 % Moisture %w/w 0.5 21 21 35 2

SE126823.007 LB055959.022 % Moisture % 0.5 16 16 36 2

SE126823.010 LB055959.026 % Moisture % 0.5 16 16 36 2



SE126807.001 LB055923.006 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Lindane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Beta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Endrin mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Isodrin mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Mirex mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.186 30 0



SE126807.008 LB055923.013 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0

Dimethoate mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0

Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0

Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Malathion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Methidathion mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 0 200 0

Ethion mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.41 30 0

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.48 30 4



SE126807.008 LB055923.015 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

17/4/2014 Page 11 of 19

SE126807 R0







DUPLICATES

PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN420


SE126807.008 LB055923.015 Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 0 200 0

Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 0 200 0

Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)-assume results

<LOR=0*

TEQ 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.41 30 2

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.41 30 0

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.48 30 4



SE126807.001 LB055923.006 Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 0 200 0

Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1 <1 0 200 0

Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.186 30 0



SE126807.010 LB055933.014 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 4 6 50 29

Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 168 0

Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 18 23 32 26

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 3.6 4.0 43 9

Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 12 13 38 12

Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 2.8 3.8 45 28

Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 6.3 7.4 59 16




Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0


Copper, Cu µg/L 1 41 40 17 1

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 <1 <1 166 0

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 2 2 69 1

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 79 79 21 0



SE126807.008 LB055923.015 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 0 200 0

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 0 200 0

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 0 200 0

TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 0 200 0

TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 0 200 0

17/4/2014 Page 12 of 19

SE126807 R0







DUPLICATES

TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403


SE126807.008 LB055923.015 TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 0 200 0

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 0 200 0

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 0 200 0

SE126807.012 LB055923.021 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 200 0

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 <45 200 0

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 200 0

TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 200 0

TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 200 0

TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 200 0

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 200 0



SE126807.010 LB055917.014 Monocyclic

Aromatic

Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0

o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Polycyclic

VOCs

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.8 3.9 50 20

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.3 4.1 50 6

d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.6 4.2 50 30

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.2 3.8 50 11

Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 200 0

Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0

SE126807.012 LB055917.017 Monocyclic

Aromatic

Benzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Toluene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 200 0

o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

Polycyclic

VOCs

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0





Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 200 0

Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 <0.6 <0.6 200 0



SE126807.010 LB055917.014 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0

TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0





VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0

SE126807.012 LB055917.017 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0

TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 200 0





VPH F Bands Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 0

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 200 0

17/4/2014 Page 13 of 19

SE126807 R0








LB055936.002 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 0.21 0.2 70 - 130 104



LB055923.002 Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 135

Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 135

Delta BHC mg/kg 0.1 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 125

Dieldrin mg/kg 0.2 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 130

Endrin mg/kg 0.2 0.3 0.2 60 - 140 135

p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.1 0.2 0.2 60 - 140 80

Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0 0.15 40 - 130 113†



LB055923.002 Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.5 1.7 2 60 - 140 87

Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.5 1.5 2 60 - 140 76

Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.2 1.7 2 60 - 140 84

Ethion mg/kg 0.2 1.6 2 60 - 140 80

Surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 80

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 84



LB055923.002 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 3.6 4 60 - 140 89

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 3.6 4 60 - 140 89

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 3.4 4 60 - 140 85

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 3.5 4 60 - 140 87

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 3.3 4 60 - 140 82

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 3.6 4 60 - 140 90

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 3.1 4 60 - 140 79

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 3.8 4 60 - 140 95

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 84

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 0.5 40 - 130 86

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.5 0.5 40 - 130 96



LB055923.002 Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.4 60 - 140 115



LB055933.002 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 45 50 80 - 120 91

Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 47 50 80 - 120 93

Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 46 50 80 - 120 93

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 47 50 80 - 120 94

Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 47 50 80 - 120 93

Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 46 50 80 - 120 93

Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 47 50 80 - 120 93



LB055964.002 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 19 20 80 - 120 95

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 20 80 - 120 101

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 21 20 80 - 120 105

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 20 20 80 - 120 102

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 21 20 80 - 120 105

17/4/2014 Page 14 of 19

SE126807 R0








LB055923.002 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 36 40 60 - 140 90

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 90

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 60 - 140 73

TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 35 40 60 - 140 88

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 60 - 140 88

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 20 60 - 140 75



LB055992.002 TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 1100 1200 60 - 140 91

TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 1100 1200 60 - 140 96

TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 1200 1200 60 - 140 101

TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 1100 1200 60 - 140 92

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 1200 1200 60 - 140 100

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 620 600 60 - 140 104




Aromatic

Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.9 2.9 60 - 140 99

Toluene mg/kg 0.1 2.9 2.9 60 - 140 100

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 2.6 2.9 60 - 140 88

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 5.1 5.8 60 - 140 87

o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.6 2.9 60 - 140 89

Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 5 60 - 140 88

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.4 5 60 - 140 107

d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.7 5 60 - 140 113

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.5 5 60 - 140 111




Aromatic

Benzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115

Toluene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116

Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.5 52 45.45 60 - 140 115

m/p-xylene µg/L 1 100 90.9 60 - 140 115

o-xylene µg/L 0.5 53 45.45 60 - 140 116







LB055917.002 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 24.65 60 - 140 89

TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 22 23.2 60 - 140 95

Surrogates Dibromofluoromethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 4.4 5 60 - 140 88

d4-1,2-dichloroethane (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.4 5 60 - 140 107

d8-toluene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.7 5 60 - 140 113

Bromofluorobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 5.5 5 60 - 140 111

VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 7.25 60 - 140 83



LB055969.002 TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 1000 946.63 60 - 140 110

TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 850 818.71 60 - 140 104





VPH F Bands TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 730 639.67 60 - 140 114

17/4/2014 Page 15 of 19

SE126807 R0






MATRIX SPIKES



SE126698.001 LB056130.004 Mercury mg/L 0.0001 0.0082 0.0002 0.008 100



SE126807.001 LB055936.004 Mercury mg/kg 0.01 0.19 <0.01 0.2 90


QC Sample Parameter Units LORSample Number Original Spike Recovery%

SE126807.007 LB055923.012 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 94

2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 95

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 92

Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 103

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 98

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 108

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 96

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 4 103

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 - -

Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 <0.8 - -


<LOR=0*

TEQ 0.2 <0.2 - -

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 86

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 82

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - 0.4 - 92



SE126807.001 LB055933.004 Arsenic, As mg/kg 3 46 <3 50 88

Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.3 46 <0.3 50 92

Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.3 52 8.7 50 86

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.5 50 3.2 50 93

Lead, Pb mg/kg 1 50 5 50 91

Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.5 51 8.0 50 86

Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.5 53 7.8 50 91



SE126699.001 LB055964.004 Arsenic, As µg/L 1 20 <1 20 97

Cadmium, Cd µg/L 0.1 20 <0.1 20 100

Chromium, Cr µg/L 1 21 2 20 95

Copper, Cu µg/L 1 20 2 20 93

Lead, Pb µg/L 1 19 <1 20 95

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1 22 4 20 90

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5 37 17 20 98



SE126807.001 LB055923.006 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 40 90

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 <45 40 83

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 <45 40 75

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 - -

17/4/2014 Page 16 of 19

SE126807 R0






MATRIX SPIKES

TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil (continued) Method: ME-(AU)-[ENV]AN403


SE126807.001 LB055923.006 TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 - -

TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 - -

TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 <25 40 85

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 40 80

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 - -



SE126807.001 LB055917.004 Monocyclic

Aromatic

Benzene mg/kg 0.1 2.5 <0.1 2.9 86

Toluene mg/kg 0.1 2.9 <0.1 2.9 98

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 <0.1 2.9 78

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.2 4.5 <0.2 5.8 77

o-xylene mg/kg 0.1 2.3 <0.1 2.9 78

Polycyclic

VOCs

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - -





Totals Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.3 6.7 <0.3 - -

Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.6 14 <0.6 - -



SE126807.001 LB055917.004 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25 <25 <25 24.65 88

TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 22 <20 23.2 93





VPH F

Bands

Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.1 2.5 <0.1 - -

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25 <25 <25 7.25 102

17/4/2014 Page 17 of 19

SE126807 R0

Matrix spike duplicates are calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) using the formula: RPD = | OriginalResult - ReplicateResult | x 100 / Mean

The original result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike. The Duplicate result is the analyte concentration of the matrix spike duplicate.

The RPD is evaluated against the Maximum Allowable Difference (MAD) criteria and can be graphically represented by a curve calculated from the Statistical Detection Limit (SDL) and Limiting Repeatability (LR) using the formula: MAD = 100 x SDL / Mean + LR


RPD is shown in Green when within suggested criteria or Red with an appended reason identifer when outside suggested criteria. Refer to the footnotes section at the end of this report for failure reasons.

MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATES


QC Sample Units LORSample Number Parameter Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %

SE126807.007 LB055923.013 Naphthalene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 1

2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 3

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 7

Fluorene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 10

Anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 6

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 32 12

Pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 33 5

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Chrysene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 32 4

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.1 - - 200 -

Total PAH mg/kg 0.8 - - 33 -


<LOR=0*

TEQ 0.2 - - 15 -

Surrogates d5-nitrobenzene (Surrogate) mg/kg - - - 30 5

2-fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - - - 30 2

d14-p-terphenyl (Surrogate) mg/kg - - - 30 0


QC Sample Units LORSample Number Parameter Original Duplicate Criteria % RPD %

SE126807.001 LB055923.007 TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 - - 85 3

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45 - - 162 6

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45 - - 178 3

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 - - 200 -

TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 - - 139 -

TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 - - 200 -

TRH F Bands TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25 - - 101 6

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 - - 200 9

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 - - 200 -

17/4/2014 Page 18 of 19




QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QA/QC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:

http://www.sgs.com.au/~/media/Local/Australia/Documents/Technical%20Documents/MP-AU-ENV-QU-022%20QA%20QC%20Plan.pdf

① At least 2 of 3 surrogates are within acceptance criteria.

② RPD failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.

③ Results less than 5 times LOR preclude acceptance criteria for RPD.

④ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to matrix interference.

⑤ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to the presence of significant concentration of analyte (i.e. the

concentration of analyte exceeds the spike level).

⑥ LOR was raised due to sample matrix interference.

⑦ LOR was raised due to dilution of significantly high concentration of analyte in sample.

⑧ Reanalysis of sample in duplicate confirmed sample heterogeneity and inconsistency of results.

⑨ Recovery failed acceptance criteria due to sample heterogeneity.

⑩ LOR was raised due to high conductivity of the sample (required dilution).

† Refer to Analytical Report comments for further information.

*

-

^

IS

LNR

LOR

QFH

QFL

Non-accredited analysis.

Sample not analysed for this analyte.

Analysis performed by external laboratory.



Limit of reporting.

QC result is above the upper tolerance.

QC result is below the lower tolerance.

This document is issued, on the Client's behalf, by the Company under its General Conditions of Service, available on request and accessible at



Any other holder of this document is advised that information contained herein reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and

within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a

transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents.


17/4/2014 Page 19 of 19

Date Reported


Contact



Alexandria NSW 2015

Huong Crawford

+61 2 8594 0400

+61 2 8594 0499

[email protected]

13

SGS Reference

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Manager

Laboratory

E22157


[email protected]

02 9516 0741

02 9516 0722


NSW 2009


Emmanuel Woelders

Samples

Order Number

Project

Email

Facsimile

Telephone

Address

Client


17/4/2014

ANALYTICAL REPORT

SE126807 R0

Date Received 14/4/2014

COMMENTS

No respirable fibres detected in all samples using trace analysis technique.

A portion of the sample supplied has been sub-sampled for asbestos according to SGS In-house procedures.

We therefore cannot guarantee that the sub-sample is representative of the entire sample supplied.

SGS Environmental Services recommends supplying approximately 50-100g of sample in a separate container.

Asbestos analysed by Approved Identifier Yusuf Kuthpudin and Ravee Sivasubramaniam.


Andy Sutton


Huong Crawford

Production Manager

Jaimie Cheung

Metals Chemist

Kamrul Ahsan

Senior Chemist

Ly Kim Ha


Ravee Sivasubramaniam

Asbestos Analyst

SIGNATORIES



Australia

Alexandria NSW 2015

Alexandria NSW 2015




ABN 44 000 964 278


VOC’s in Soil [AN433/AN434]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006

Benzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Toluene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

o-xylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3

Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.60 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1


11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012

Benzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Toluene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

m/p-xylene mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

o-xylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Total Xylenes* mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3

Total BTEX* mg/kg 0.60 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6


UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 2 of 2017/04/2014


Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil [AN433/AN434/AN410]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006

TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20

Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1


11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012

TRH C6-C9 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20

Benzene (F0) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

TRH C6-C10 mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 3 of 2017/04/2014


TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN403]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006

TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45 <45

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90 <90

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120

TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110

TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1


11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012

TRH C10-C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20

TRH C15-C28 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 84 <45

TRH C29-C36 mg/kg 45.0 <45 <45 <45 <45 62 <45

TRH C37-C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100

TRH >C10-C16 (F2) mg/kg 25.0 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) mg/kg 90 <90 <90 <90 <90 140 <90

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) mg/kg 120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120 <120

TRH C10-C36 Total mg/kg 110 <110 <110 <110 <110 150 <110

TRH C10-C40 Total mg/kg 210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210 <210

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 4 of 2017/04/2014


PAH (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) in Soil [AN420]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006


2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Fluorene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1

Pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.3 <0.1

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1

Chrysene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Total PAH mg/kg 0.80 <0.8 <0.8 1.1 <0.8 1.5 <0.8

Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)

-assume results <LOR=0*

TEQ 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL

11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

2-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

1-methylnaphthalene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Fluorene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.3

Anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 3.1

Pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 3.0

Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.3

Chrysene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.4

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.2

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.0

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.0

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.7

Dibenzo(a&h)anthracene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2

Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.2

Total PAH mg/kg 0.80 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 20

Carcinogenic PAHs (as BaP TEQ)

-assume results <LOR=0*

TEQ 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 2.9

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 5 of 2017/04/2014


OC Pesticides in Soil [AN400/AN420]

BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00

SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009

Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Lindane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Heptachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Aldrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Beta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Delta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Dieldrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Endrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Isodrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

Mirex mg/kg 0.10 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 6 of 2017/04/2014


OC Pesticides in Soil [AN400/AN420] (continued)

PARAMETER UOM LOR

BH7-1

SOIL

11/4/14 16:30

SE126807.011

Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Alpha BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Lindane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Heptachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Aldrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Beta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Delta BHC mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

o,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Alpha Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Gamma Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Alpha Chlordane mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

trans-Nonachlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

p,p'-DDE mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Dieldrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Endrin mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

o,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

o,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Beta Endosulfan mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

p,p'-DDD mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

p,p'-DDT mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Endrin Ketone mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Isodrin mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

Mirex mg/kg 0.10 <0.1

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 7 of 2017/04/2014


OP Pesticides in Soil [AN400/AN420]

BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00

SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009

Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Dimethoate mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Malathion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Methidathion mg/kg 0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Ethion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH7-1

SOIL

11/4/14 16:30

SE126807.011

Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.50 <0.5

Dimethoate mg/kg 0.50 <0.5

Diazinon (Dimpylate) mg/kg 0.50 <0.5

Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Malathion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Parathion-ethyl (Parathion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Bromophos Ethyl mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Methidathion mg/kg 0.50 <0.5

Ethion mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg 0.20 <0.2

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 8 of 2017/04/2014


PCBs in Soil [AN400/AN420]

BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00

SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009

Arochlor 1016 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1232 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1242 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1248 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1254 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1260 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1262 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Arochlor 1268 mg/kg 0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH7-1

SOIL

11/4/14 16:30

SE126807.011










Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg 1.0 <1

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 9 of 2017/04/2014


Total Recoverable Metals in Soil by ICPOES from EPA 200.8 Digest [AN040/AN320]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006

Arsenic, As mg/kg 3.0 <3 5 4 7 5 4

Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3 0.3

Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.30 8.7 16 10 23 14 12

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.50 3.2 3.3 9.2 3.7 13 16

Lead, Pb mg/kg 1.0 5 11 30 15 19 20

Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.50 8.0 1.7 5.9 1.5 15 30

Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.50 7.8 7.6 51 23 28 31

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1


11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012

Arsenic, As mg/kg 3.0 4 <3 4 4 4 5

Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0.30 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3

Chromium, Cr mg/kg 0.30 18 7.7 15 18 15 11

Copper, Cu mg/kg 0.50 4.8 9.2 26 3.6 7.8 29

Lead, Pb mg/kg 1.0 9 10 9 12 23 14

Nickel, Ni mg/kg 0.50 5.2 19 56 2.8 7.6 52

Zinc, Zn mg/kg 0.50 5.8 27 45 6.3 19 52

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 10 of 2017/04/2014


Mercury in Soil [AN312]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006

Mercury mg/kg 0.010 <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 0.02 0.01

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1


11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012

Mercury mg/kg 0.010 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 11 of 2017/04/2014


Fibre Identification in soil [AN602]

BH1-1 BH2-1 BH3-1 BH4-1 BH5-1 BH6-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00

SE126807.001 SE126807.003 SE126807.005 SE126807.006 SE126807.008 SE126807.009

Asbestos Detected No unit - No No No No No No

Estimated Fibres %w/w 0.010 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH7-1

SOIL

11/4/14 16:30

SE126807.011

Asbestos Detected No unit - No

Estimated Fibres %w/w 0.010 <0.01

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 12 of 2017/04/2014


Moisture Content [AN002]

BH1-1 BH1-2 BH2-1 BH2-2 BH3-1 BH4-1


11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 12:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 13:00 11/4/14 14:00 11/4/14 14:30

SE126807.001 SE126807.002 SE126807.003 SE126807.004 SE126807.005 SE126807.006

% Moisture % 0.50 13 19 18 19 19 15

UOMPARAMETER LOR

BH4-2 BH5-1 BH6-1 BH6-2 BH7-1 B1


11/4/14 14:30 11/4/14 15:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:00 11/4/14 16:30 11/4/2014

SE126807.007 SE126807.008 SE126807.009 SE126807.010 SE126807.011 SE126807.012

% Moisture % 0.50 20 8.3 16 21 16 17

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 13 of 2017/04/2014


VOCs in Water [AN433/AN434]

R1

WATER

11/4/2014

SE126807.013




m/p-xylene µg/L 1.0 <1


Total Xylenes µg/L 1.50 <1.5

Total BTEX µg/L 3.0 <3

Naphthalene µg/L 0.50 <0.5

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 14 of 2017/04/2014


Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water [AN433/AN434/AN410]

R1

WATER

11/4/2014

SE126807.013

TRH C6-C9 µg/L 40 <40

Benzene (F0) µg/L 0.50 <0.5

TRH C6-C10 µg/L 50 <50

TRH C6-C10 minus BTEX (F1) µg/L 50 <50

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 15 of 2017/04/2014


TRH (Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons) in Water [AN403]

R1

WATER

11/4/2014

SE126807.013

TRH C10-C14 µg/L 50 <50

TRH C15-C28 µg/L 200 <200

TRH C29-C36 µg/L 200 <200

TRH C37-C40 µg/L 200 <200

TRH >C10-C16 (F2) µg/L 60 <60

TRH >C16-C34 (F3) µg/L 500 <500

TRH >C34-C40 (F4) µg/L 500 <500

TRH C10-C36 µg/L 450 <450

TRH C10-C40 µg/L 650 <650

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 16 of 2017/04/2014


Trace Metals (Dissolved) in Water by ICPMS [AN318]

R1

WATER

11/4/2014

SE126807.013

Arsenic, As µg/L 1.0 <1


Chromium, Cr µg/L 1.0 <1

Copper, Cu µg/L 1.0 41

Lead, Pb µg/L 1.0 <1

Nickel, Ni µg/L 1.0 2

Zinc, Zn µg/L 5.0 79

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 17 of 2017/04/2014


Mercury (dissolved) in Water [AN311/AN312]

R1

WATER

11/4/2014

SE126807.013

Mercury mg/L 0.00010 <0.0001

UOMPARAMETER LOR

Page 18 of 2017/04/2014

SE126807 R0METHOD SUMMARY


The test is carried out by drying (at either 40°C or 105°C) a known mass of sample in a weighed evaporating

basin. After fully dry the sample is re-weighed. Samples such as sludge and sediment having high percentages of

moisture will take some time in a drying oven for complete removal of water.

AN002

Unpreserved water sample is filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and acidified with nitric acid similar to

APHA3030B.

AN020

A portion of sample is digested with Nitric acid to decompose organic matter and Hydrochloric acid to complete the

digestion of metals and then filtered for analsysis by ASS or ICP as per USEPA Method 200.8.

AN040

A portion of sample is digested with nitric acid to decompose organic matter and hydrochloric acid to complete the

digestion of metals. The digest is then analysed by ICP OES with metals results reported on the dried sample

basis. Based on USEPA method 200.8 and 6010C.

AN040/AN320

Separatory funnels are used for aqueous samples and extracted by transferring an appropriate volume (mass) of

liquid into a separatory funnel and adding 3 serial aliquots of dichloromethane. Samples receive a single extraction

at pH 7 to recover base / neutral analytes and two extractions at pH < 2 to recover acidic analytes. QC samples

are prepared by spiking organic free water with target analytes and extracting as per samples.

AN083

Orbital rolling for Organic pollutants are extracted from soil /sediment by transferring an appropriate mass of

sample to a clear soil jar and extracting with 1:1 Dichloromethane/Acetone. Orbital Rolling method is intended for

the extraction of semi-volatile organic compounds from soil /sediment samples, and is based somewhat on USEPA

method 3570 (Micro Organic extraction and sample preparation). Method 3700.

AN088

Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Waters: Mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution

to elemental mercury. This mercury vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption

spectrometer or mercury analyser. Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration

standards. Reference APHA 3112/3500.

AN311/AN312

Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS in Soils: After digestion with nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid,

mercury ions are reduced by stannous chloride reagent in acidic solution to elemental mercury. This mercury

vapour is purged by nitrogen into a cold cell in an atomic absorption spectrometer or mercury analyser .

Quantification is made by comparing absorbances to those of the calibration standards. Reference APHA

3112/3500

AN312

Determination of elements at trace level in waters by ICP-MS technique, in accordance with USEPA 6020A.AN318

OC and OP Pesticides by GC-ECD: The determination of organochlorine (OC) and organophosphorus (OP)

pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soils, sludges and groundwater. (Based on USEPA methods

3510, 3550, 8140 and 8080.)

AN400

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons: Determination of Hydrocarbons by gas chromatography after a solvent

extraction. Detection is by flame ionisation detector (FID) that produces an electronic signal in proportion to the

combustible matter passing through it. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) are routinely reported as four

alkane groupings based on the carbon chain length of the compounds: C6-C9, C10-C14, C15-C28 and C29-C36

and in recognition of the Draft NEPM 2011, >C10-C16 (F2), >C16-C34 (F3) and >C34-C40 (F4). F2 is not

corrected for Naphthalene.

AN403

(SVOCs) including OC, OP, PCB, Herbicides, PAH, Phthalates and Speciated Phenols (etc) in soils, sediments

and waters are determined by GCMS/ECD technique following appropriate solvent extraction process (Based on

USEPA 3500C and 8270D).

AN420





AN433/AN434

VOCs and C6-C9/C6-C10 Hydrocarbons by GC-MS P&T: VOC`s are volatile organic compounds. The sample is




AN433/AN434/AN410

Qualitative identification of chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite in bulk samples by polarised light microscopy (PLM)

in conjunction with dispersion staining (DS). AS4964 provides the basis for this document. Unequivocal

identification of the asbestos minerals present is made by obtaining sufficient diagnostic `clues`, which provide a

reasonable degree of certainty, dispersion staining is a mandatory `clue` for positive identification. If sufficient

`clues` are absent, then positive identification of asbestos is not possible. This procedure requires removal of

suspect fibres/bundles from the sample which cannot be returned.

AN602

Page 19 of 2017/04/2014


FOOTNOTES

*

**

^

Analysis not covered by the

scope of accreditation.

Indicative data, theoretical

holding time exceeded.

Performed by outside

laboratory.

-

NVL

IS

LNR

Not analysed.

Not validated.





Some totals may not appear to add up because the total is rounded after adding up the raw values.

The QC criteria are subject to internal review according to the SGS QAQC plan and may be provided on request or alternatively can be found here:



http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions/General-Conditions-of-Services-English.aspx. The Client's attention is drawn to the limitation of





This report must not be reproduced, except in full.

UOM

LOR

↑↓

Unit of Measure.

Limit of Reporting.

Raised/lowered Limit of

Reporting.

Page 20 of 2017/04/2014

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 108161

Client:



Pyrmont

NSW 2009

Attention: Emmanuel Woelders

Sample log in details:

Your Reference: E22157, Marrickville

No. of samples: 1 Soil

Date samples received / completed instructions received 14/04/14 / 14/04/14

Analysis Details:

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.

Report Details:

Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 23/04/14 / 17/04/14

Date of Preliminary Report:

NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.

Results Approved By:

Page 1 of 9Envirolab Reference: 108161

Revision No: R 00

Client Reference: E22157, Marrickville

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil

Our Reference: UNITS 108161-1

Your Reference ------------- I1

Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014

Type of sample Soil

Date extracted - 15/04/2014

Date analysed - 16/04/2014

TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg <25

TRH C6 - C10 mg/kg <25

vTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1) mg/kg <25

Benzene mg/kg <0.2

Toluene mg/kg <0.5

Ethylbenzene mg/kg <1

m+p-xylene mg/kg <2

o-Xylene mg/kg <1

naphthalene mg/kg <1

Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene % 80


Revision No: R 00


svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil



Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014

Type of sample Soil



TRH C10 - C14 mg/kg <50

TRH C15 - C28 mg/kg <100

TRH C29 - C36 mg/kg <100

TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg <50

TRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene

(F2)

mg/kg <50

TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg <100

TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg <100

Surrogate o-Terphenyl % 97


Revision No: R 00


Acid Extractable metals in soil



Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014

Type of sample Soil

Date digested - 15/04/2014


Arsenic mg/kg <4

Cadmium mg/kg <0.4

Chromium mg/kg 14

Copper mg/kg 29

Lead mg/kg 15

Mercury mg/kg <0.1

Nickel mg/kg 61

Zinc mg/kg 36


Revision No: R 00


Moisture



Date Sampled ------------ 11/04/2014

Type of sample Soil

Date prepared - 15/04/2014


Moisture % 16


Revision No: R 00


Method ID Methodology Summary

Org-016 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.

Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1

Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.

Org-014 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS.

Org-003 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by

GC-FID.

F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater

(HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.

Metals-020 ICP-

AES

Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.

Metals-021 CV-

AAS

Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.

Inorg-008 Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 deg C for a minimum of 12 hours.


Revision No: R 00


QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate

Sm#

Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %

Recovery

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in

Soil

Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD


014

[NT] [NT] LCS-2 15/04/2014


014

[NT] [NT] LCS-2 16/04/2014

TRH C6 - C9 mg/kg 25 Org-016 <25 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%


Benzene mg/kg 0.2 Org-016 <0.2 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%

Toluene mg/kg 0.5 Org-016 <0.5 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 78%

m+p-xylene mg/kg 2 Org-016 <2 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%

o-Xylene mg/kg 1 Org-016 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 76%

naphthalene mg/kg 1 Org-014 <1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Surrogate aaa-

Trifluorotoluene

% Org-016 87 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 79%


Sm#


Recovery

svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD


014

[NT] [NT] LCS-2 15/04/2014


014

[NT] [NT] LCS-2 15/04/2014




TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg 50 Org-003 <50 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 80%



Surrogate o-Terphenyl % Org-003 99 [NT] [NT] LCS-2 88%


Sm#


Recovery

Acid Extractable metals

in soil


Date digested - 15/04/2

014

[NT] [NT] LCS-6 15/04/2014


014

[NT] [NT] LCS-6 15/04/2014

Arsenic mg/kg 4 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<4 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 102%

Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<0.4 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 109%

Chromium mg/kg 1 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 107%

Copper mg/kg 1 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 103%

Lead mg/kg 1 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 107%

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 Metals-021

CV-AAS

<0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 100%


Revision No: R 00



Sm#


Recovery

Acid Extractable metals

in soil


Nickel mg/kg 1 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 107%

Zinc mg/kg 1 Metals-020

ICP-AES

<1 [NT] [NT] LCS-6 108%

QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank

Moisture

Date prepared - [NT]

Date analysed - [NT]

Moisture % 0.1 Inorg-008 [NT]


Revision No: R 00


Report Comments:

Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job

Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job

INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested

NA: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required

<: Less than >: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample

Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,

glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.

Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample

selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.

Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix

spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.

LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank

sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds

which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency

to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix

spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is

generally extracted during sample extraction.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%

for organics and 10-140% for SVOC and speciated phenols is acceptable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been

reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, the sample

volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy

laboratory QA/QC protocols.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of

recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis has

proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs,

every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as

soon as practicable.


Revision No: R 00

john f rancis walsh environmen tal site asse ssment …

Documents