joint aviation authorities joint operation evaluation ... · pdf filejoint aviation...

JOINT AVIATION AUTHORITIES

JOINT OPERATION EVALUATION BOARD REPORT

Airbus A330

A330-200 & A330-300 series

20/12/04

JAA – Joint Operational Evaluation Board A330 FCL & OPS Subgroup

Révision 00- December 2004 page 2

Contents

JAA Operation Evaluation Board – FCL & OPS Subgroup Page 3

Preamble Page 4

Executive Summary Page 5

Operational Evaluation Report – FCL & OPS Subgroup Page 6

1 Purpose and Applicability Page 6

2 Pilot Type rating requirements Page 6

3 Master Common Requirements (MCR) Pages 6 to 7 3.1 Altitude callouts during landing Page 7

3.2 Aircraft Approach Categories Page 7

4 Master Differences Requirements tables (MDR) Page 7

5 Operator Differences Requirements Tables (ODR) Page 8

6 Specification for Training Page 6.1 Type rating course (transition course) Pages 9, 10

6.1.1 Area of emphasis Page 9

6.1.2 Type rating course Page 10

6.2 Line Flying under supervision Page 11

6.1.2 Purpose of Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS) Page 11

6.1.3 LIFUS in case of A330 initial type rating Page 11

6.3 Familiarization courses & Familiarization sectors Page 12

6.3.1 Familiarization courses Page 12

6.3.2 Familiarization sectors Page 12

6.4 Recurrent training Page 12

7 Specification for Checking Page 13 7.1 Skill test following type-rating course (transition course) Page 13

7.2 Recurrent Checking Checks Page 13

7.3 Line Checks Page 13

8 Currency / Recent experience Page 13

9 Operational recommendations Page 14

Annexes (available on Request to the National Authorities)

Annex 1: Airbus Type Rating course – Objectives and phases

breakdown

Pages A1-1 to 2

Annex 2: Airbus recommendations for recurrent training & checking

Annex 3: A330/340 JOEB decision dated 28 April 1998

Page A2-1

Pages A3-1 to 3



JAA Operation Evaluation Board – FCL& OPS Subgroup

Captain Pete GRIFFITHS

National Resource Manager– CAA UK

Jean-Pierre MESURE

Licensing Division – DGAC France

Jean BARIL

JOEB Co-ordinator - Central JAA

Evan NIELSEN

Certification manager - Flight Standards - EASA

Report prepared and submitted by:

Jean-Pierre MESURE, FCL & OPS Subgroup Focal Point



Preamble

.As no JAA operational evaluation was carried out at the time of the introduction of the A330

into airline service Airbus has requested a “catch up” process to cover this family of aircraft.

This report has been complied by analysis of existing reports from individual national

authorities of the JAA and from the FAA FSB report. It includes the differences between the

variants which have already been accepted as allowing a single licence endorsement for the

A330-200 and the A330-300. (Appendix 1 to JAR-FCL 1.220)

The objective of this “catch-up” report is to specify the JAA type rating, initial training course,

familiarization courses, checking and currency minimum requirements, operational

recommendations:

- For an initial type rating on the A330,

- For pilots already qualified on one A330 variant and moving onto another variant.

This catch-up evaluation has been made in compliance with the JAA Terms of Reference,

and the JOEB Handbook.

Fergus Woods Georges Rebender

JAA Licensing Division Director JAA Operations Division Director



Executive Summary

The evaluation was conducted by the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) to meet the JAA requirement

for the JOEB. (Catch up process)

Airbus requested confirmation that the A330-200 and the A330-300 share the same type rating

and should therefore have a single type rating licence endorsement: “A330” for all variants.

Also that pilots holding an A330 type rating achieved on the A330-200 or the A 330-300 should be

able to qualify on the other variant after completion of familiarization training.

The familiarization training included ground school (CBT) to cover technical differences.

The Operational Evaluation was conducted in accordance with the processes detailed in the JAA

JOEB Handbook, dated December 2002 and JAA Administrative & Guidance Material procedures

Section One (General) Part 2 (Procedures), dated 01 February 2004.

JAR requirements as in JAR-OPS 1 (§ 1.940, 1.945, 1.950, 1.965, 1.970 and 1.980 including

associated appendices, AMCs and IEMs), JAR-FCL 1 (§1.215, 1.220, 1.225, 1.230, 1.235, 1.240

and 1.261 including associated appendices, AMCs and IEMs) have been considered.

Airbus provided the Operational Evaluation team with Operator Differences Requirements (ODR)

tables to be used as a basis for the evaluation. Previous evaluation made by the France DGAC on

behalf the A 330/A340 JAA JOEB in April 98 was also considered (refers to Annex 3).

The “catch-up” process of the Airbus A330 – 200 and the A330 - 300 aircraft by the JAA was

completed by November 26 2004. System differences were reviewed and Normal, Abnormal, and

Emergency procedures compared for the A330-200 and A330-300. Sample Operator Difference

Requirements were examined and proposed Computer Based Training (CBT) reviewed.

The authorities confirm that only "B" level differences (aircraft are functionally similar) exist

between the A330 - 200 and the A330 - 300. Ground courseware on CBT/Video/Transparencies is

adequate to cover differences when transitioning from:

§ The A330 - 200 variant to the A330 - 300 variant

§ The A 330 - 300 variant to the A330 – 200.

JAA recommends the approval of the Airbus proposed training courses for initial type rating

on the A330 and familiarization training for variants.

JAA recommends approval of the Airbus referenced ODR Tables.

The CJAA confirms the same type rating, “A330” (as single licence endorsement), is applied

to all variants of the A330.



Operational Evaluation Report / FCL & OPS Subgroup 1. Purposes and Applicability

This report

§ Defines the Type Rating assigned to the A330 family.

§ Proposes Master Common Requirements (MCR).

§ Describes Master Differences Requirements (MDR) for crews requiring differences

training

§ Provides reference of acceptable Operator Difference Requirements (ODR tables).

§ Makes recommendations for initial Training

§ Makes recommendations for Familiarization training course

§ Makes recommendations for checking

§ Makes recommendations for currency

2. Pilot Type Rating requirements

In reference to JAR FCL1 Subpart F and to the JOEB evaluation procedure, the same Type

Rating and, consequently, the same licence endorsement are assigned to the A330-200 and

A330-300.

Pilots completing the necessary training and checks in the A330-200 or A330-300 as per

JAR- FCL 1, prescribed by this report, are assigned the “A330” type rating.

Unless otherwise specified, “A330” means A330-200 and A330-300 variants throughout the report.

3. Master Common Requirements

Master Common Requirements (MCR) are requirements common to the A330-200 and

A330-300.

The A330-200 & 300 variants have been designed with a very high level of commonality in

terms of:

1) Cockpit layout

2) System definition and operation, and

3) Handling characteristics



This level of commonality has a direct and significant impact on the definition of the training

programmes.

3.1 Altitude callouts during landing Use of automatic voice callouts for landing is the same for all A330 aircraft.

These callouts may be customized consistent with JARs for low visibility operation (JAR-

AWO, JAR-OPS 1) for the intended operation. Operators flying more than one A330 variant

fleet should standardize those callouts within the fleet.

3.2 Aircraft Approach Categories:

Ref: Appendix 2 to jar-Ops 1.430(c)

Aircraft Category

A330-200 C

A330-300 C

4. Master Differences Requirements tables

Master Difference Requirements (MDR) for the A330 aircraft are shown in the table below.

The MDRs for the A330-200 & 300 variants are based on FAA FSB report (“catch up”

process).

Definitions of the various levels for Training/ Checking/ Currency are the ones from the JOEB

handbook, and the relevant definitions are included after the table for reference.

TO FROM

A330-200

A330-300

A330-200

NA

B/A/A

A330-300

B/A/A

NA

“NA” means “Not Applicable”



Difference level definitions Training/Checking/Currency extracted from the JOEB

handbooks:

Level B Training. Level B difference training is applicable to functionally similar

aircraft with system or procedure differences that can adequately be addressed

through aided instruction. At Level B, aided instruction is appropriate to ensure crew

understanding, emphasize issues, provide a standardised method of presentation of

material, or to aid retention of material following training. Level B aided instruction

typically employs such methods as slide/tape presentations, Computer Based

Training (CBT), stand-up lectures, or videotapes.

Level A Checking. Level A checking indicates that no check related to differences is

required at the time of differences training. A crewmember is, however, responsible

for knowledge of each variant flown, and differences may (and should) be included as

an integral part of subsequent recurrent proficiency checks.

Level A Currency. At Level A currency is considered to be common to each variant.

Thus, assessment or tracking of currency for separate variants is not necessary or

applicable. Maintenance of currency at in any one variant or a combination of variants

suffices for any other variant.

5. Operator Differences Requirements Tables

ODR tables are used to show an operator’s compliance method. Detailed Airbus generic

ODR tables are on file with the Central JAA. Copies are available on request. These ODR

tables are provided as Airbus generic, and therefore may not include items that are

applicable to particular operators. The ODR tables assume that pilots are qualified, current

and experienced in operating the base aircraft.

The Airbus ODR tables have been developed in accordance with AMC 1.980(b) & IEM

1.980(b) of JAR-OPS 1 Subpart N.

These ODR tables have been found acceptable by JAA. They represent an acceptable

means of compliance with MDR provisions for the aircraft evaluated based on those

differences and compliance methods shown. These tables do not necessarily represent the

only means of compliance for operators with aircraft having other differences.

Operators with a fleet containing more than one A330 variant must have approved ODR

tables.



6 Specifications for Training 6.1 Initial Rating course (transition course) 6.1.1 Area of emphasis

Features within the electronic flight control system and its associated side stick controller, the

A/THR system, the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring system (ECAM), warrant

special interest and emphasis.

NOTE: The following applies to the A330 family but also to all aircraft types and

variants that belongs to the Airbus “fly by wire” family.

In light of the unique features of this aircraft family, the JOEB has determined that certain

aspects of knowledge, skills and abilities must be emphasized during the initial training

process:

Ø Fly by wire

- Knowledge of flight characteristics and the degree of flight envelope protection

provided by the various flight control laws both for pitch, roll and yaw control

- Procedural and handling consequences following multiple failures that result in

alternate and/or direct law

- Knowledge of the use of side stick controller with a special emphasis on the

relationship between the two controllers and the transfer of control

Ø Use of the Flight Management System

- Knowledge of the various modes of automation

- Knowledge and skills related to MCDU / FCU use

- Recognition of mode awareness and transition modes through the FMA

- CRM issue linked to automation (task sharing and crosschecks)

Ø Use of ECAM

- Knowledge of appropriate use of ECAM in conjunction with system failures

- Crew discipline for ECAM actions: respect of the depicted procedure, crosscheck

of irreversible actions, aircraft status analysis



Ø Auto Thrust system

- Knowledge of the thrust control system in conjunction with the “non moving

throttles”

- Recognition of all messages associated to Auto Thrust failure, engagement and

disconnection

6.1.2 Type rating course

The Airbus proposed type-rating training (transition course) is in compliance with Appendix 2

to JAR-FCL 1.240 & 1.295 and AMC FCL 1.261 (c) (2).

The course is divided in the following phases:

- Ground phase

- Normal phase

- Abnormal/emergency phase

- LOFT phase

- Skill test (See checking § 7 for details)

- Flight phase (base training if applicable)

All students are “Trained to Proficiency”. The objectives and phases breakdown are included

in Annex 1. They are extracted from the Airbus TRTO documentation and reflect the status of

the A330 type-rating course.

For a pilot to be qualified onto a specific variant of the A330, several paths exist depending

upon simulator availability and are as follows:

a) Qualification onto A330-200:

§ Type Rating course conducted on A330-200 simulator, or

§ Type Rating course conducted on A330-300 simulator then familiarization course from

A330-300 to A330-200



b) Qualification onto A330-300:

§ Type rating course conducted on an A330-300 simulator, or

§ Type Rating course conducted on A330-200 simulator then familiarization course from

A330-200 to A330-300

In summary, for type rating course on the A330 family, any simulator configuration can be

used provided that the familiarisation training for the variant to be flown is subsequently

conducted.

6.2 Line flying under supervision (LIFUS)

6.2 .1 Purpose of Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS)

There are a variety of reasons why the JOEB may specify LIFUS in conjunction with master

difference requirements. One or more of the reasons described below may apply:

a. Introduction of new aircraft types or variants

b. Introduction of new systems (e.g., FMS, TCAS)

c. Introduction of new operation (e.g. oceanic operation)

d. Experience for a particular crew position (e.g. PIC, SIC, F/E)

e. Post qualification skill refinement (e.g. refining alternate or multiple ways to use

particular equipment to increase operating efficiency, operating flexibility, or

convenience)

f. Special characteristics (e.g. unique airports, mountainous areas, unusual or

adverse weather, special air traffic control procedures, non-standard runway surfaces

and dimensions, etc.)

6.2.2 LIFUS in case of initial type rating onto any A330 variant

In the case of an initial type rating onto the A330, a minimum of 10 sectors including a line

check is recommended for Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS).

This may be reduced at the discretion of NAA taking in account relevant factors such as

conclusions established by the JAA Cross Crew Qualification / Mixed Fleet Flying (CCQ/MFF)

working group and previous experience of the pilots.

Where there is a change of operating conditions or route structure this should also be taken

into account and may need the addition of sectors to cover these elements.



6.3 Familiarization courses & Familiarization sectors

6.3.1 Familiarization courses

The transition between A330-200 and A330-300 is assessed as requiring training level B.

Familiarisation training is based upon clearly defined learning objectives and addresses all

differences as identified in the ODR tables.

Airbus familiarization courses provided under Computer Based Training (CBT) have been

assessed and found acceptable.

JOEB recommend approving the Airbus familiarization training courses:

6.3.1 Familiarization sectors

Following familiarization training between A330 variants, JOEB does not find any need for

familiarization sectors.

NOTE: Familiarization sectors differ from LIFUS, as a line check is not required following

completion of those familiarization sectors, when required.

6.4 Recurrent training.

The recurrent training program must comply with JAR-OPS 1.965.

All A330 variants are under the same license endorsement; as a consequence, recurrent

training on one variant is valid for all, provided that the differences between variants are

covered.

Differences between A 330 variants are identified in ODR tables, as specified under JAR-

OPS 1.980.

Differences between the A330 variants have been assessed at level B which means that

recurrent training shall be addressed through aided instruction such as:

- Slide / tape presentations

- Computer Based Training (CBT) which may be interactive

- Video

- Classroom instruction

As a consequence recurrent training can be conducted on any A330 simulator, provided that

the differences are covered as per the proposed matrix in Annex 2.



7. Specification for Checking

7.1 Skill test following type-rating course (transition course)

In addition to the mandatory items from the skill test as per Appendix 2 to of JAR-FCL 1.240

the following features must be checked:

- Use of side-stick controller

- Knowledge of the various mode of automation

- Knowledge and skills related to the use of MCDU/ FCU and crosschecks using the FMA

- Use of ECAM

- Use of auto thrust system

7.2 Recurrent Checking Checks

Proficiency checks must be conducted in compliance with JAR-FCL 1.245 and JAR-OPS

1.965.

JOEB and CJAA confirm that a proficiency check conducted on one variant is valid for all

variants, provided that the differences have been covered during the recurrent training, as

per the enclosed Table in Annex 2.

Consequently proficiency checks can be conducted on any A330 simulator.

7.3 Line checks

As all A330 variants share same type rating (single licence endorsement), a line check on

any of them is valid for all.

8. Currency / Recent experience

Compliance with JAR-OPS 1.970 or JAR-FCL 1.026 as appropriate is required for recent

experience.

Concerning the A330 family, JAA concluded that take-offs and landings performed on one

A330 variant, within ninety days, are valid for all variants. This means that for pilots flying

more than one A330 variant, the recent experience requirement is satisfied as soon as they

achieve 3 take-offs and landings, as handling pilot, regardless the variant flown.



9. Operational recommendations

JOEB and CJAA recommend that operators, of A330 fleets with different variants use a

unique cockpit configuration for the following safety related items:

- Unit system (metric or non metric) on all displays.

- Altimeter settings (QNH/QFE)

- Callouts

- FMS specifications and functions (software and hardware)

***********************

Annex 1 A330 Airbus type Rating Course

Objectives and Phases breakdown – Extracted from the approved TRTO

documentation

TITLE

GENERAL OBJECTIVES

MEDIA

In accordance with Appendix 2

to JAR-FCL 1.240 & 1.295.

PHASE 1 GROUND COURSE

- Welcome To clarify all administrative aspects of trainee involvement while at Airbus Training Center. To present Airbus Training Center.

- Presentation of course and documentation To introduce the instruction system and the instructors. Trainees are briefed on the evaluation method and necessity for some "home-work" with the FCOM and the FCTM. To present the documentation. To present the philosophy of the new aircraft systems.

-Systems Study To provide trainees with technical information on system knowledge. To provide the knowledge required for the execution of all Normal, Abnormal and Emergency procedures.

- Performances To make the trainee able to: - use performance data in the Airbus documentation, or the FOVE software from his laptop, - review theory and acquire knowledge on limitations, - calculate Take-off, Landing and Go-Around performances, - calculate Engine out performances,

- calculate operational performances. -Safety, Cabin Presentation

To be familiarized with location and operation of safety equipment doors, exits, and use of escape slides.

- Walk-around visit (self study on laptop)

To give the necessary knowledge to perform an exterior inspection. - Examination – Systems and Performance

To demonstrate the level of knowledge required for the safe operation of the aircraft.

- Airbus CRM - OPTIONAL

To reinforce basic cockpit resource management skills.

Video CBT FMGS free play 3D FBS Cabin Mockup.


Révision 00- December 2004 page A 1 - 2

Annex 1 (continued) A330 Airbus type Rating Course

Objectives and Phases breakdown – Extracted from the approved TRTO documentation

TITLE

GENERAL OBJECTIVES

MEDIA

In accordance with Appendix 2

to JAR-FCL 1.240 & 1.295.

PHASE 2 NORMAL

OPERATIONS

- Normal procedures To execute normal procedures with each crewmember performing the tasks specific to his operating capacity (PF/PNF), including crew coordination. To make each trainee capable of performing the tasks in normal flight conditions (no failures).

- Normal flight conditions To demonstrate aircraft characteristics in flight without failures, from "basic" manual flight to "managed" (from lowest to highest level of automation). Normal procedures are practiced until the trainee reaches proficiency in all phases of flight.

- Progress Check

FMGS free play 2D. FBS FFS

PHASE 3

ABNORMAL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS

- Abnormal/Emergency procedures

To use the Abnormal/Emergency procedures with each crewmember performing the tasks specific to his operating capacity (PF/PNF), including crew coordination.

- Abnormal/Emergency flight conditions

To demonstrate aircraft characteristics in flight with failures. Abnormal/emergency procedures are practiced until the trainee demonstrates proficiency in all phases of flight.

- Progress Check

FMGS free play 2D. FBS FFS

PHASE 4 ALOFT

TYPE RATING SKILL

TEST

- Loft To perform ALOFT session taking into account CRM objectives including decision making and crew coordination.

ALOFT is used to reinforce the trainees' confidence in an operational environment prior to the operation of the aircraft.

Type Rating Skill Test

Type rating skill test: to demonstrate the skills required for the safe operation of the aircraft.

FFS

PHASE 5

BASE TRAINING

Flight training to proficiency.

Aircraft Or FFS (for operators who have this authorization from their National Aviation Authority)



Annex 2 A330 Recurrent Training Matrix between variants

A330 - 200 <> A330 – 300

Differences Level

General

Dimensions: Length: -200: 58.4 m -300: 63.7 m Height: -200: 17.8 m -300: 16.8 m Max passenger capacity: -200: 375 -300: 440

A

Limitations § Operation

Max take off weight ( basic) -200: 230 t (507050 lb) -300: 215 t (473980 lb) Max landing weight: (basic) -200: 180 (396800 lb) -300: 177 t (389400 lb) CG limits: -200: 17% to 41% -300: 14% to 42% For weight, refer to Flight Manual Taxi: -200: Decreased distance between nose wheel and main gear

B

ATA 22 Alerting FMA and triple click ( if not retrofitted ) A On the A330 – 200 center tank is added Transfer logic ( auto and manual ) Gravity feeding Control panel: additional Push buttons Additional ECAM warnings

ATA 28

Jettison ( option )

B

Depending of engine type ( GE, PW or RR ) Engine parameters Engine start logic EPR Fault ( N1 rated or unrated modes )

ATA 70

Relight envelope

B

A330 – 200/300 Enhanced

ATA Differences Level

ATA 22 PITCH TRIM/MCDU/CG DISAGREE caution B Electrical rudder Back up Control Module (BMC ) and associated warnings

ATA 27

Automatic TRIM setting (option)

B

ATA 29 Automatic activation of the Blue Elec pump with Engine 1 Failure if aircraft is dispatched with PRIM 3 Fault

B

PFD,ND and ECAM DU’s: new LCD A ATA 31 St By Instruments replaced by ISIS A

ATA 34 EGPWS: Peaks mode and new warnings B



Annex 3

joint aviation authorities joint operation evaluation ... · pdf filejoint aviation...

Documents