jonathan b. bricker, phd fred hutchinson cancer research center university of washington

23
Commitment Therapy For Smoking Cessation: 3 Month Processes & Outcomes Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center University of Washington

Upload: oprah-bass

Post on 03-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

First RCT of Web-Based Acceptance & Commitment Therapy For Smoking Cessation: 3 Month Processes & Outcomes. Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center University of Washington. Reach & Efficacy of Smoking Intervention Modalities. 30% 20% 10%. Individual. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

First RCT of Web-Based Acceptance & Commitment Therapy For Smoking

Cessation: 3 Month Processes & Outcomes

Jonathan B. Bricker, PhDFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

University of Washington

Page 2: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Reach & Efficacy of Smoking Intervention Modalities

Reach(# of million using modality annually)

1m 2m 3m 4m

Efficacy(% Quit at

12 months)

30%

20%

10%

Individual

Web

Telephone

Group

Page 3: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Why do current interventions have low quit rates?

Interventions don’t focus on basic processes that lead people to smoke

and to relapse!

Page 4: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Basic Processes: Low Acceptance& Commitment

Low Acceptance at age 18 predicted a 2.75 times higher odds (p <.001) of smoking at age 20 (99% data retention; N = 3305; Bricker et al., 2011)

Low Commitment to Quitting predicted a 2.32 times higher odds (p <.01) of relapse 26 weeks after quit date (92% data retention; N = 157; Kahler et al., 2007)

Page 5: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a Potential

Solution to the Problem of Low Quit Rates

Page 6: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

What is ACT?

Page 7: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Acceptance of our

“baggage”

Committed Action in valued

direction

Page 8: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Pathways to Acceptance

Mindfulness: Present-moment focused attention in the face of challenging circumstances

Defusion: Stepping back and watching the process of thinking

Self-as-Context: The “part” of us that is aware of what we think, feel, and sense

Page 9: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Pathways to Commitment

Values: What deeply matters; want you want your life to be about

Action: Doing what it takes, guided by what deeply matters

Page 10: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Acceptance & Commitment Lead to Life-Embracing Behavior

Change

Mindfulness

Defusion

Self as Context

Acceptance

Values

Commitment

Action

Life-Embracing Behavior Change

Page 11: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Web-Delivered ACT for Smoking Cessation

Page 12: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington
Page 13: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Phase II Trial of Web ACT vs. Current Standard for Smoking

Cessation (FHCRC Pilot Grant; PI: Bricker)

Aim 1: Show trial design feasibility: recruitment, study arm balance and retention

Aim 2: Assess ACT 3-month cessation process & outcomes compared with Smokefree

Page 14: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Comparison: Smokefree.gov

Current Standard: US Clinical Practice Guidelines and panel of experts

Most visited in US: 1.2 million annual visitors

Highest user satisfaction: Of all non-profit websites (Etter et al, 2006)

Benchmark 7-10% quit rate: consistent with other published website trials (Hutton et al., 2011)

Page 15: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Experimental Design

Page 16: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Aim 1 Results: Recruitment

Enrollment: 621 eligible, 302 consent, 222 randomized (94 per month)

Recruitment sources:

41%: Referring websites (e.g., Google Ads)

35%: Search engine results (e.g., “how to quit smoking”)

24%: Direct entry (e.g., media)

Page 17: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Aim 1 Results: Demographics at Baseline & Retention

BaselineCharacteristic

Smokefree.gov

(n=111)ACT

(n=111)

BaselineCompariso

np=value

3-monthRetention

Comparisonp=value

Age, mean (SD)

45.3 (13.1) 44.8 (13.6)

0.76 0.84

Male 35% 41% 0.36 0.15

Caucasian 90% 95% 0.20 0.32

Hispanic 3% 6% 0.20 0.53

Married 42% 45% 0.95 0.14

Working 60% 62% 0.78 0.67

HS or less educ

24% 19% 0.15 0.56

Page 18: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Aim 1 Results: Smoking & Social Env at Baseline & Retention

BaselineCharacteristic

Smokefree.gov

(n=111)ACT

(n=111)

BaselineCompariso

np=value

3-monthRetentionCompariso

np=value

Smoking Behavior

1st cig within 30 min of waking

82% 75% 0.25 0.58

Smokes more than

half pack per day

80% 76% 0.63 0.30

Smoked for 10 or more years

79% 81% 0.45 0.20

Quit attempts in past 12M, mean (SD)

1.4 (2.1) 1.5 (2.6) 0.61 0.36

Friend & Partner Smoking Close friends who smoke, mean (SD)

1.6 (1.6) 1.7 (1.5) 0.84 0.44

Living with partner

who smokes

26% 22% 0.53 0.33

Page 19: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Aim 2 Results: 3-Month Cessation Processes

ACT Smokefree p-value

Acceptance of physical cues, mean

2.38 1.81 0.001

Acceptance of emotional cues, mean

1.95 1.63 0.022

Acceptance of cognitive cues, mean

1.77 1.48 0.083

Number of quit attempts since randomization, mean

9.21 3.92 0.101

Nicotine dependence 18% 44% 0.036

Page 20: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Aim 2 Results: Quit Rate

3-Month Outcome ACT Smokefreep-

value

30-day quit rate 23% 10% 0.050

Page 21: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

Conclusions

Aim 1: Feasible trial design.

Aim 2: Process results comport with ACT theoretical model & show lower nicotine dependence than Smokefree.

Page 22: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

ACT’s 23% Quit Rate

Over double 10% Smokefree quit rate.

Over 2-3 times higher than typical website.

Rare evidence of tx website being more effective than comparison tx website.

Achieved without pharmacotherapy.

Page 23: Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center  University of Washington

ResearchStaff