jonpol explorations limited - ontario...base station list 1.0 summary this exploration project of...
TRANSCRIPT
32D04NE2019 2.19923 MCVITTIE
REPORT
ON
010
MaxMin EM6
MAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD SURVEY(August 1999)
/*--1-,s C;*
Crosby Lake Property
Mcvittie TownshipLarder Lake Mining Division
Northeastern Ontario
NTS 32D/4
UTM Grid Zone 17, NAD. 27
For
Jonpol Explorations Limited
Douglas Robinson P. Eng. Doug Robinson Consulting
PROVINCIAL. RECORDING OFFICE - SUDBURY
RECEIVED
1999P.M.
lliilM
32D04NE2019 2.19923 MCVITTIE 010C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.O SUMMARY........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
2 .0 LOCATION AND ACCESS.................................. l
3.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION.......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
4.O REGIONAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
5.0 EXPLORATION RATIONAL............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2MaxMin Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... 2Magnetic Survey . . .. ... .. .. .................. . .. 2
6.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM.............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . 3Magnetic Survey ..................... ... ..... ... 3Topographic Survey . .. ... ................,...... 4
7 .0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'i i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Magnetic Survey . . . . . . . .. ....................... 4Topographic Survey ............................. 6MaxMin Survey . . . . .. ... .. ....................... 6
8.O RECOMMENDATIONS.................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.0 REFERENCES........................................... 11
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . 12
LIST OF TABLES S FIGURES
Location Map including Regional Geology (After Chart A, MRC No3)
Compilation Map (Magnetic s MaxMin) Scale 1:5000, Lines 1100-100W
Compilation Map (Magnetic i MaxMin) Scale 1:5000, Lines 1700-100W
Compilation Map (Magnetic, MaxMin and Topographic Features) Scale 1:5000, Lines 1700-100W
Contoured Magnetic Total Field Map Scale 1:5000
MaxMin and Topographic Notes
Base Station List
1.0 SUMMARY
This exploration project of the Crosby Lake north of Larder Lake, Ontario included MaxMin and total field strength magnetic surveys on a grid cut by Martin Harrington. The author supervised the geophysics and prepared this report. Positive results of this exploration program includes the identification of exploration targets and the identification of structural trends that may define structural breaks of the type that control gold mineralization.
2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property is centred at 5334200 mN and 0600000 mE (NTS 32D/4), approximately 7.5 km north east of Larder Lake, Ontario.
Road access north from Highway 66 is by the gravel Larder Station Road, one kilometre northeast of Larder Lake. The Larder Station road crosses lines 700W'-tlOQt"J and intersects the base line at approximately 62'5W.
3.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION
The property is relatively flat with moderately sloping hills. Relief is generally less than 35 metres. Approximately 25-50% of the surveyed area is outcrop area or shallow overburden. Boreal forest provides the main forest cover.
Doug Robinson Consulting
4 .0 REGIONAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The property is located in Kinojevis volcanics 4 km north of the Larder Lake Break.
The property geology consists predominantly of Kinojevis Group Mg and Fe rich tholeiitic basalt and gabbro and Timiskaming sediment units (Map 2628).
5.0 EXPLORATION RATIONAL
MaxMin SurveyThe MaxMin survey targeted:a. structural breaks of the type that control gold
mineralization in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lakearea (frequency 3555 Hz) and
b. stockwork-massive sulphide mineralization(frequency 888 and 3555 Hz).
The 3555 Hz frequency responds to both structural breaks and stockwork-massive sulphide mineralization at shallow depths. The 888 Hz responds predominantly to stockwork- massive sulphide mineralization and graphite. A null response of the 888 Hz frequency relative to moderate to strong 3555 Hz response eliminates to stockwork-massive sulphides and graphite as the cause of EM responses.
Disseminated sulphides that commonly host gold mineralization are not expected to respond to an EM survey. Isolated sulphide grains that are not connected do not generate a detectable response.
Magnetic Survey
This magnetic survey targeted alteration associated with deformation zones that commonly control Au deposits in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake-Cadillac-Val d'Or Gold Belt. These deposits tend to be located in and near altered deformation zones within 10 km of the Larder Lake-Cadillac Deformation Zone. This survey targeted
Doug Robinson Consulting
alteration and associated gold mineralization. These alteration zones tend to be magnetically neutral (commonly lows) in areas where magnetic minerals are replaced by non-magnetic Fe-Mg-Ca carbonates as part of the alteration and mineralization. (Secondary magnetite in intense silicification can cause magnetic highs within alteration zones that otherwise have low magnetic fields).
6.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Results of the topographic, MaxMin 3555 S 888 Hz and magnetic surveys are plotted on 1:5000 scale profiles. The magnetic profiles with an expanded vertical scale of 100 nT/cm are plotted on separate sheets. The magnetic data is supplied in a 1:5000 scale contour map. A 1:5000 scale compilation map is also provided.
GridMartin Harrington cut a metric grid consisting of 100 spaced lines with pickets spaced at 25 m intervals. The base line is approximately azimuth 113 0 .
Magnetic SurveyThe author of this report conducted a total field strength magnetic survey of the property August 7 and 15 1999. A Scintrex Envimag in walkmag mode was used. Magnetic readings at 2 second intervals were measured along lines 1100W-200W. This interval rendered readings spaced at approximately two metre intervals.
Base stations were established along Base Line 0+OON at 50 m. intervals. Each base station reading was established standing on the east side of the picket while facing north. See appendices for base station values.
Doug Robinson Consulting
The survey traverses were interrupted at the base line for base station readings. Magnetic readings of the grid lines were corrected relative to the base stations. Interpretation was performed from 1:5,000 profiles. A 1:5,000 contour plan is provided to supplement the profiles.
Topographic SurveyTopography measurements by Suunto clinometer were recorded in percent and used to maintain the transmitter and receiver coils coplanar during the survey. This process was used to eliminate topographic noise that can result in weak responses being overwhelmed by topographic effects. Weak MaxMin responses encountered appear to have real sources; either due to bedrock features or surficial deposits.
The topography was plotted at 1:5000 scale on the EM- Magnetic profile sheets and the notes were included in the typed EM notes included in this report.
MaxMin SurveyThis MaxMin EM survey was performed during August 7, 15 and 17, 1999. MaxMin magnetic total field and topography profiles were plotted in stacked format to facilitate interpretation of the responses. The locations of EM responses were transferred to magnetic profiles and 1:5000 compilation maps included in this report.
Typed MaxMin notes are included in the report.
7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Magnetic SurveyThe magnetic signature of the grid consists of relatively flat magnetic relief. Several magnetic highs reported below may be caused by mafic flows or intrusives or Timiskaming sediments containing 1-5*1
Doug Robinson Consulting
magnetite.
A Prominent magnetic high extends from line 1100W-400W between 100N-160N. Line 400W-125N is a magnetic low that appears to be a magnetic rock having a reversed magnetic pole or a magnetic shadow at the east edge of the magnetic high. This trend may be cut of at line 400W by a possible NE trending structure; the location of which is indicated by a series of possible weak 3555 Hz responses (B s G) .
A second magnetic high between l4OS-2lOS extends from Line 1100W-800W. This magnetic high appears to be cut of at line 800W; possibly by the same structure that appears to cut the above magnetic high.
A strong magnetic high is located south of 300S on lines 300W-200W. Line 100W was not surveyed by magnetometer.
Narrow magnetic highs located at 600W-186S, 600W-320N and 700W-125S do not appear to be related to the major magnetic highs described in this report.
Breaks in the magnetic profiles are reported on the magnetic compilation by the "Z" symbol with the cap and foot of the symbol indicating the sense of the magnetic shift. These magnetic breaks may indicate structural breaks or geological contacts. The may also be caused by sharp topographical relief in areas of moderate to high vertical magnetic gradient.
Magnetic breaks located at 800W-240N, 700W-255N and 600W-220N, and are associated with possible weak 3555 Hz response "E" indicating a possible structural break or geological contact may exist at this location.
Breaks located at 1000W-067S, 800W-026N and 600W-080N and may be spatially related, indicating a possible structural break.
Doug Robinson Consulting
Topographic SurveyLine 200W with 29.8 meters vertical relief was the greatest relief encountered.
MaxMin SurveyThe 888 Hz frequency was quiet, detecting a few, very weak bedrock responses possibly related to weqakly connected sulphides and/or graphite; the targeted host for volcanogenic base metal deposits. This indicates Induced Polarisation can be used to effectively map disseminated pyrite concentrations possibly hosting gold mineralization.
The 3555 Hz frequency produced numerous weak to strong responses indicating bedrock structure or subsurface topographic feature are present on most lines as tabulated below:
Line 100WJ 235S 3555 Hz Weak QP response only.
Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
A 025S-025N 3555 Hz Strong QP Weak IP response.888 Hz Weak QP response.
Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.Possible weak contribution from minorsulphides.
H 212N 3555 Hz Moderate QP response only.Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
Line 2POWJ 240S 3555 Hz Very weak QP response only.
Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature
A 025S-025N 3555 Hz Strong QP response s weak IP response.
Doug Robinson Consulting
888 Hz Weak QP response.Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.Possible weak contribution from minorsulphides.
Line 300WJ 250S 3555 Hz Very weak QP response only.
Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature
A OOOS-018N 3555 Hz Strong QP response 6cweak IP resoponse.
888 Hz Weak QP response.Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.Possible weak contribution from minorsulphides.
050N Possible northern limit of response "A". G 177N 3555 Hz Weak QP response.
Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
Line 400WA 010N-028N 3555 Hz Strong QP response.
Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.
Line 500WA 015S-050N 3555 Hz Strong QP response.
Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.
Line 600WB 050S-013N 3555 Hz Moderate QP response.
Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.Possibly coincident with "F"
E 200N 3555 Hz Very weak QP response?
Doug Robinson Consulting
Possible topographic feature. Possible bedrock feature.
Line 7POWB 050S-030S 3555 Hz weak QP response.
Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.Possibly coincident with "F".
E 225N 3555 Hz Weak QP response.Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
F 382N 3555 Hz Partial weak QP response?Possible topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
Line 8POWC P12N 3555 Hz Very weak QP response.
Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
E 224-232N 3555 Hz Weak QP response.Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
F 48PN 3555 Hz Partial strong QP response.Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.IP component topographic noise.
Line 90PWC 010S-P13N 3555 Hz Very weak QP response?
Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
E 225N 3555 Hz Very weak QP response?Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
F 546N 3555 Hz Partial (Moderate?) QP response.Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.IP component topographic noise.
Doug Robinson Consulting
Line 1000W035S-025S 3555 Hz Weak but distinct QP response.
Probable topographic feature. Possible bedrock feature.
Line 1100W060S-016S 3555 Hz Weak but distinct QP response.
Probable topographic feature. Possible bedrock feature.
The 3555 Hz responses are probably caused by a combination of weakly conductive bedrock structures, lithological contacts and wet overburden located in bedrock depressions.
Response "A" from Lines 500W to 100W is a strong quadrature phase response that appears to terminate between line 600W and 500W at a weaker response (B) that trends grid 0700 . Response "B" could be a cross cutting structure or a flexure in the source.
Response "C" appears to be another response and is located on the north part of a distinctive weakly magnetic unit.
Responses "A" and "C" may be located on the same geological formation. The magnetic signature of this unit along response "A" may be disrupted by alteration.
Response "C" may be parallel to (grid 0700 ) and appears to be located 100 metres north of response "B".
Response "E" may be located along a lithological contact or break also marked by a magnetic break.
Response "F" is located along the road appears to beindependent of the road. This response appears to becontrolled by a feature along the south shore of
Doug Robinson Consulting
Crosby Lake.
Isolated response "G" is questionable. It is approximately on strike with responses "B" and "F".
Isolated response "H" is also questionable. It is approximately on strike with responses "B". "E" and "C".
Response "H" is also questionable, particulary on line 300W.
8.0 RECOtffiNDATIONS
Favourable MaxMin responses identified probable bedrock features that may be geological breaks. These should be tested for fault controlled alteration that may host gold mineralization.
Response "A" on lines 500W to 100W is the most favourable target and drilling is recommended on this target. Line 200W should be drilled as it is a strong and well defined target. Line 500W should also be drill tested as it is located near an apparent cross structure or flexure in the source.
Response "C" should be tested by a shallow hole on line 1100W or 1000W.
A dipole dipole Induced Polarisation survey (a spacing 25m) is recommended on lines 1100W, 500W, 300W and along base line DOON. A survey of base line DOON would be particularly beneficial if significant sericite alteration is present. This survey would target the strongest pyrite mineralization to select cross lines for follow up Induced Polarisation.
Doug Robinson Consulting
10
Crosby Lake.
Isolated response "G" is questionable. It is approximately on strike with responses "B" and "F".
Isolated response "H" is also questionable. It isapproximately on strike with responses "B". "E" and H ( it
Response "H" is also questionable, particulary on line 300W.
8 .0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Favourable MaxMin responses identified probable bedrock features that may be geological breaks. These should be tested for fault controlled alteration that may host gold mineralization.
Response "A" on lines 500W to 100W is the most favourable target and drilling is recommended on this target. Line 200W should be drilled as it is a strong and well defined target. Line 500W should also be drill tested as it is located near an apparent cross structure or flexure in the source.
Response "C" should be tested by a shallow hole on line 1100W or 1000W.
A dipole dipole Induced Polarisation survey (a spacing 25m) is recommended on lines 1100W, 500W, 300W and along base line DOON. A survey of base line DOON would be particularly beneficial if significant sericite alteration is present. This survey would target the strongest pyrite mineralization to select cross lines for follow up Induced Polarisation.
Doug Robinson Consulting
10
9.0 REFERENCES
Savage, W.S., 1964. Mineral Resources and Mining Propertiesin the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Area. Ontario Department of Mines, Mineral Resources Circular No 3. p77 s Chart A.
MERQ-OGS, 1983. Lithostratigraphic Map of the AbitibiSubprovince; Ontario Geological Survey/Ministere de 1'Energie et des Ressources, Quebec; scale 1:500 000.
Map 2628. Precambrian Geology, Larder Lake Area. Ontario Geological Survey. Scale 1:50,000
Doug Robinson Consulting
11
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Douglas Robinson, of 24 Victoria Avenue, Swastika, Ontario hereby certify that:
1. I am a registered professional Engineer of the province of Ontario, No. 39322011.
2. I am a graduate of Queen's University in Kingston Ontario with an Honours Bachelor of Science, Geological Engineering 1975, andNorthern College, School of Mines in Haileybury, Ontario, 1970.
3. I have been practising my profession since graduation.
4. The information contained in this report is the result of work done by myself and the references cited.
5. I own no direct or indirect interests in and do not expect to receive any interests in the Crosby Lake Property.
Respectfully submitt
Douglas Robinson, P. September 13, 1999
Doug Robinson Consulting
12
LEGEND
GENERALIZED GEOLOGY
] Cobalt sedimentary rocks.
Acid intrusive rocks.
Intermediate and basic intrusive rocks.
tittii'ttevitH Older sedimentary and 5;V--vXv-v:::':-| volcanic rocks ''••'•T'it'i" ::Vi (Timiskaming series!.
Acid and basic volcanic rocks and undifferentiated
•J diorites.
Iron formation.
SYMBOLS
Producing Mine.
Other Properties.
3)——'STOP. C.l.M. FIELD TRIP, 1967
NOTES
Properties indicated by numbers on the map are named under the Property List of the ODM Mineral Resources Circular No. 3 .
For detailed geology of townships see list of Geological Maps in
circular.
SOURCE OF INFORMATION
Compiled by W. S Savage, 1963,
Location Map including Regional Geology (After Chart A, MRC No3)
1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W 100Wz oox to
t'
z o o in
0 0
of)
z o oCM
z o0
co
co0o
COo oCM
to o o
COo o
i i i i i i
X '^
[V^y j] f
• + 1 t " \tl + *i Wi y90
j \
4 - ! - N-? +l .—J i^1i i l
4 ! - ! - ?-1 ' !ill i
j ' r™^1™
j [^ s . r4^^- J ^ ji. ^-J-2.2-5 -j-2-^ ^4-^^ ^TE
i i i i * 1 i
4- 4- 4- 4-4-
ii
| - * * j-j
l! ? ^-e)200 -f " " '' 4- '-- -^\ ! !
i i tP)' 1-7-7 i1 — - ^T '~ ~~ -J- " ! s \~ i r ' i! ---i~~ I i~~~*-~~~"F"~-~i fr L -T -1--L- -i -.t.\ -I R i
-^---T 4- t 4- .t i- ,^T R i 4- 1 \ *T \ A. l l
! -1 : ' i | j | l -.
j 't^r013^- -^-0- o|2. , -
Jr-^"l^ l 3f^'^4 060 l1 { j ..OJO |C! - - 4 " : ^ , 1
[ ~~ t "^ i
, - " t " *i ii
j 4- 4- 4- 4-
-4- 4^ 4- 4- 4- 4-
ii iii
i, o su Ki o Jt?-^ r , '\ — o 2,0 v* — - n ? ^" iT (7 *" i LJ "~" i/ \ ; "~- *^C.J j-* 1 fc- t N^ \f ^\ — . -t /-i /o . — - -r~ ' 1 j\ j — f—f" u 10 J — ' -^. ;r15 i 010 ^^ ozF"?*N C*/"! J
\X v 1 -i 4-\\J\ 14. 4- -)-
i -p *i
\? _ -©' - _ --9
1250
t . i ..
4- 4. 4-
i i i i i
Soz
w 1
1
Tsz
L
trf8z
1/L0
z
D
z
0I&o
D
103
/)
13.5
33
^O Ol/)
.
Magnetic High
1 Magnetic Low
|R Magnetic Reversal (?)
-j Magnetic Break
T MaxMin Response-2 Bar shows extent12V Frequency 3500 Hz
Location k limits 224, 232 IP - in phaseQP - quadrature phase
1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W 100W
so o so 100 Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp. \^^^wgggggs^^Eiri COMPILATION -^
(meters) . . \Magnetic and MaxMin (EM) S
' Contour Interval: Automatic5CINTREX ENVIMAP plot by Douqlas Robinson, Douq Robinson Consulting Decimation: 12 Decrees West
I7oo 400W 300W 200W 100W
2./L
100W
(metere)
Contour Interval: Automatic
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp.COMPILATION
Magnetic and MaxMin (EM)
SCINTREX ENV1MAP plot by Douglas Robinson, Pong Robinson Consulting Declination: 12 Dwjreos West
6oo I7oo I6bo , 5oo ii/oo I3oo 1200 1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 200W 100W
500 4 f
too •H 4: 4 4 "f~~^
300 4.
2.00
100 "
j
l
4
t
4- 4-
f
(90
} in
10 D
ZOO
3OO
400 -.
4- i
H4-^Sl
t
rf
4-
4-
* *
i
4- 4-
Ch05by La4-
f\
4-
4-
4-
4-
4-
4-
x
6*
6'177
xx
OZ5
? ? —J—-OOO '— JO/6 02.J
•OGOs
S
4'
S '
.43Z5 --
500 --
600 --
•31Y- -
HIS-\
X/? ^
?-^ -
^5I2oo
4^
4,
4-
L*.ke
loll02,8
oio
4
1015
4-
010
r-e
l 4--
E)2/0i-018 -~'Ooo
OZ5
OZ5"
'^^
4-
4
4-
4-
4-
4-
4-
4^
rf.
4-
4-
4- -f 4- -
-- .
250?vo
4-
\4- -
\
1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W
6
2./L
X3j?
/Voo x 300W 200W 100W
s,/ -I-
50 O 50 100
(motere) J
Contour Interval: Automatic
.Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp.COMPIUTION
Magnetic and MaxMin (EM)
SCINTRCX tNVIMAP plot by Douglas Robinson, Douq Robinson Consulting Declination: 12 Dogreos West
1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W
so o so 100
(meters)
Contour Interval: 25 nT
1100W
4-
1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W
Crosby Lakd Grid: Mcvittie Twp.MAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD STRENGTH
(nanoTeslas)
SCINTREX ENVtMAP plot by Douglas Robinson, Doup Robinson Consuffa'nq
4 -
200W
Declination: 12 Degrees West
1700W 1600W 1500W 1400W 1300W 1200W 110OW 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W
- 4 4
4 + 44
4
--/4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4-
4 4 -
GJ
1700W 1600W 1500W 1400W 1300W 1200W 1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W
100 100(meters)
Contour Interval: 25 nT
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Tp.MAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD STRENGTH
nanoTeslas
SCINTREX ENVIMAP plot by Douglas Robinson, Doup Robinson Consulting
-4
-4
—— 1 —— 1 —— f ——
—————————————————————————— , ———————————— ̂ -
i i i-^
DO -300 -200 -100
*— *~~±—*^ ^-*-c4^*~- -
Topogra phy
^^~ ̂ "~^-*~~^ "* 0.0
. -*;n
0 100 200 300 400 500
3555 Hz.
— t- — t — t — ~
060
DO -300 -200 -100
"*~
-O-
I
0
——^-4^4^^
16
t^t^t^——— !-~^-*^
- 30-20- 10- 0- -10- -20
xn
0 100 200 300 400 500o/ in , o/ /-in l
888 Hz. 40 30 20 10 O-10-20
-40-400 -300 -200 -100 100 200
%IP ^OP
300 400 500
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800-400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1100W
500
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Separation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topogra
.^i i *-^ . — * — i- — * — ^* — * — "
phy
— i — fr — **—, — i — *-—^ — — * — i — i — *— -4— -**— -* —
-400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400
50.0
0.0
-50.0500
3555 Hz.
^..t .. ±̂ '.T
^-4^*^±j^
035 :
00 -300 -200 -100
jo
k-*-^^*^
23
•^t^*—*~ — f — ̂ — f---. t-t- t .^--If^*
- tu
20- 10
0 - -10- -20
. An
0 100 200 300 400 500——— 1 ——— %IP -4- --fcOP
888 Hz.
-4 00 -3
^ . ^^.^—^ f
00 -2
"^-t-
DO -1
-. *v^.
DO (
—— 1 —— -i., — K^
) 1CA/ IP
1 -f ———— 1 ——————— ————— 1 ————————————— 1 ————————————— l"- ——————————
)0 2C
1
)0 3()0 4(
t—*
)0 5(
- HU
- ^n20
- 10- n
-10-20
-40
DO
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
200 300 400
57800
57600
56800500
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1000W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topogra )hy 50.0
-50.0-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
3555 Hz. 40302010
-10-20-30-40
010 oil C)
-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500--- -X,OP
888 Hz.
600
403020
-10-20-30-40
-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 900W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Separation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topogra
- — i —— ̂ — +T—*
'
^-*—*~ — *— ̂ Jphy
* * ^-^^~^* -^ i —
-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500
50.0
0.0
-50.0600
3555 Hz. 40302010
-10-20-30-40OI2, 2^
-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
888 Hz. 40
20 10 O-10-20
^r
-40-300 -200 -100 100 200 300
-*IP400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800-300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 800W
600
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topogra 3hy
—— 1 —— *- -K^
-400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400
50.0
0.0
-50.0500
3555 Hz. 40
2010
-10-20
3OSO O 30 382. -40-400 -300 -200 -100 100
-•56 IP
200 300 400 500
888 Hz. 40 30 20 10 O-10-20-30-40
-400 -300 -200 -100 100 200"/UP
300 400 500
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
200 300 400
57800
57600
56800500
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 700W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
-4(
-41
-4
30 -300 -200 -100
t~Z±--
30 -300 -200
Topogra
0
'
OSO
-100
--*-.
^MH
phy
100
3555 Hz.
-f— ̂ t""--
^
0—— 1—
-i K—
DO -300 -200 -100
-i--'"
0/3
en n
200 300
k--*----*- h —— *——4-,^^
100n/ ip *v,npTtt Ir 70 \J l
888 Hz.
t---~-t
0— i —
C
---t--?--*"'
?5 zoo
0.0
. .en n
400 500
xn
hjj
200 300
—— -h---*.
100% IP o- o/np
— -t™* — ****
- 20- 10- 0- -10- -20
. -.an
400 500
-in
-4 —————————
200 300
•an
- 20- 10- 0
-10-20
Art
400 500
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
f —— -- .r^J
*^ ——— ̂
"00 -300 -200 -100
^^^
0
y\-
100
'V^^7k—V
200 300 400 5
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800 30
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 600W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Separation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
-4
-4
-t * i -— -f— ̂
Topogra
00 -300 -200 -100 0
.^-^ '-^t-r-t^t-T,
0(5
phy en n
100
3555 Hz.
te**
^
u.00 -300 -200 -100 0
. W, \
OSO
- 0.0
. -*;n n
200 300 400 500
An
,-'*"*-*—
100D ---a.---V.nD
— 1--*— r
on
-20L 10- 0- -10- -20
. -An
200 300 400 500
888 Hz. 40
2010
-10-20-30-40
•4 * 4
-400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400-%l
500
Total Magnetic Field Strength (riT)
. '
3r -ir
sOV\y— — A — —4/^ri ^^
a/ouu
57600
57400
57200
57000
cconn
00 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
d: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Separation e: 500W Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
-4
-4
-4
, 4
1 _____ -
__________________________
Topogra
DO -300 -200 -100
— 4 — ̂ —
phy
0 100
3555 Hz.
*T- ̂"V
olo
DO -300 -200 -100 C
i , ^— *-^l.
2)
— i —
t-.
DO -300 -200 -100
Total
-*'
018
200
" ^ i -*—
100Q. IP *v.npTb IK *- roUr
888 Hz.
.^?-^T- -1-
0
-t-
cn n
0.0
. -t;n n
300 400 500
An
..^—t—— 1 —— 1 — -~
200
^-~^f
100—— i —— %|P ----K-.-'fcOP
20100-10
- -20
. An
300 400 500
An
t -*
200
20- 10- 0
-10- -20
/in
300 400 500
Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
J^^\y
00 -300 -200 -100
-JU-^-. X"
0
v^100
HA-
200
lv^\
-rv
300 400 5(
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800 30
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 400W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
-4
-4
-4
Topogra
r T^^t^^. — , •— ̂ ^^
Phy
—— 4 —— h —— 1 ——— 1 ——— 1 ——— 1-
0.0
- -*;n n
DO -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
3555 Hz.
.-4---*--*-" ' 1 J 1 ——
•? 12SO(P
1 —— ̂ """^L""'""'" — ~-'-*^
000 (
-^ —1 .1^
•' _?__
^ (^)
"--•h--*--'
? 1
•'776
- ^n- 20- 10
0-10
f- -20- -"^0
. AC\
DO -300 -200 -100 0 0|8 05 100 200 300 400 500
^^
—— 1 % ID ±. **Lr\D
888 Hz.
~4---.1 L ^ —— t — ±~ i ,r- f- -^.^^--'
r 40
- ^0*ju
20100-10-20.70ov
^ n-*tu
00 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500——— H % ID j^ o^np
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
. 4
"P\^v
V̂-V ^A^r/-~-—•^r -~\r~- —— -js"
^—— ————— -^ ———— v~ —~
00 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 5(
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800 DO
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 300W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
-5
-5
30
Topogra
-400
30
__^ — -H —— t — .i —
phy
-300 -200 -100 0
3555 Hz.
•t— ±^**~ ±~;
-400
x*-*— t — ±—
—— 2-4- — —
i^-1""'r'' ,^^"*
^—̂4^ *^^^^
\ 1
015
-300 -200 -100————— 1L Of, Ip
•''
4
^*— *~-~*-~H0.0
. .*;n n
100 200 300 400
An
^~-*^'.tf ...""•'
J^
0--K—— ^
f
02.5
.-*-*^"^*~~*^-i — :
on
-20- 10- 0--10--20
AC\
100 200 300 40060P
888 Hz.
-5 30
i ^^^
-400
•-t--* i — 4-^-t-* ' "~T— *—•*-l-
-300 -200 -100—— 1 —— %IP -
0•K-- -J
yin
rrr+ri^K^^.
on
- 20- 10- 0 --10- -20
ouxn. . . ., -^y
100 200 300 4006OP
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
J
00
lly
l
y
-400
yx^~V^-
^ ————— ̂ v^ ^
-300 -200 -100
^ -\A
0
^J\^
100 200 300 4(
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800 )0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 200W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
-4
-4
— K- ̂ ^^-fr — i* ^— -1 —— * —— *— H
00 -300 -200 -100
*^±— L - ~ j. A— — *-^-i^*^*^
Topogra
0
Uc^--^s x H
x l(
^15 (00 -300 -200 -100
r™*
X
phy
— K— K--*. . 0.0
. tin n
100 200 300 400 500
3555 Hz.
^
•M
0
^^ ,**'-*
o\2^
~-*~~ *^*— , r—*— i-^Z—T
l
J?d) 2 H
-20h 10-0 --10--20--30. An
| "TV/
100 200 300 400 500. . j. v. ID j v.no 1
888 Hz.
-4
t*- "4^ — -
00 -3 DO -2 DO -1
r-* — "^•--*-r—
DO C- —— H
*~*-* 4
) Ui —— 'X,\P --*-
^
W 2C-- -*OP
k 4- -*
)0 3(JO 4CJO 5(
-20
100 -10
--20
-40)0
Gri Lin
JO -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 5C
d: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation e: 100W Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
o/ouu
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800 JO
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1100W
58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
1:5000 Scale
hO-
060 O l
56800--500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1000W
584001:5000 Se ale
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200A
035 2.557000
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 900W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
570000/0
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 800W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
V-
O232.
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 O 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 700W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000olO
215nry n '
302
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 600W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
OSO o '3
O
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 500W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
L/ l
oi5 050
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 O 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic l l Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 400W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 300W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
250
000 O
I77
C)050
01656800
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm)Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 200W
1:5000 Scale58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000?
202 02,5 02.5
-500 -400 -300 -20056800
-100 100 200 300 400 500 600
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp100WS100mAugust 17 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz.QP 888 Hz. "/o Slope Elevation3503253002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350-375-400
323222343331
-1-14646210422-113
139-11148897-2-7
-11-15-717
1065
-1222544
101100111
-1110-144241
-1-2101-2-22
31
-1-1-112121
-1-3-4-4-3-11211
-1-100100
18-10-203-24
152022
-22-1700000
4520-4-5-9-4-41818142080
0.04.52.0-3.0-2.3-2.8-1.82.07.07.58.02.5-1.8-1.8-1.8-1.8-1.8-1.89.5
14.513.512.310.09.08.0
12.517.020.525.527.527.5
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp200WN100mAugust 17 1999
Station250225200175150125100
755025
0-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350-375-400-425
IP 3555 Hz.
43686631004555411123131
-2
QP 3555 Hz.
810141211
3-5
-13-11-15
-62875522223344
IP 888 Hz.
2035432100234430
-101202
-11
QP 888 Hz.
123320
-24
-3-5-20211100000000
"/o Slope000
-20-201025
70000
-5-40-17
-707
1010-7
-14-14-14-14
-7-7
Elevation-29.3-29.3-29.3-29.3-24.3-19.3-21.8-28.0-29.8-29.8-29.8-29.8-29.8-28.5-18.5-14.3-12.5-12.5-14.3-16.8-19.3-17.5-14.0-10.5-7.0-3.5-1.8
0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie TwpLine: 300WLocation of Receiver relative to Transmitter: NCoil Spacing 100mDate: August 7 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. "/o Slope Elevation2502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350
111333000242211111241
-2-3-4-10-3-5-9
-12-706965531122
0-101110001210
-1-1-1-1-102-1
-1-2-2-1-1-1-2-3-4-3-11211100-100
-1-20330000000
-27-15-9-7-5-5-1-133-7-7
-18.8-18.5-18.0-18.0-18.8-19.5-19.5-19.5-19.5-19.5-19.5-19.5-19.5-12.8-9.0-6.8-5.0-3.8-2.5-2.3-2.0-2.8-3.5-1.80.0
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to TransmitterCoil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: McVrttie Twp400WS100mAugust? 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz.350325300275250225200175150125100755025O
-25-50-75
-100
3 2 2 2 2 1 O -112 O O O32
778
11131010961-5-7-9-3 3
1 O 1 O O O-1-3-1 O-1-1-1 1 O
z.
112232221
-1-2-2-320
•/o Slope
0123
10-1-212-3-3-3-7-2227
426
Elevation0.00.00.30.81.54.03.83.36.35.54.84.02.31.82.32.84.5
15.016.5
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp500WS100mAugust 17 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. "/o Slope Elevation3253002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75•100-125•150•175
11102221211121221
43456773
-1-66-607742
-11
-1-1010-10-10000010
10011110
-1-2-2-2-11100
116353137
-14-14-4-2007132215-2-2-7
0.02.84.35.06.37.0
10.312.08.55.04.03.53.53.55.38.5
14.017.817.316.815.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie TwpLine: 600WLocation of Receiver relative to Transmitter: SCoil Spacing 100mDate: August 17 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. 'ft Slope Elevation
3633383133002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75-100-125-150-175
20011121211201
-111112
77544345554-1-5-6-4-3-2134
0-10-1-100-10-100-20-2-10000
11100001111
-1-2-2-2-1-1000
864113378-8-6-4-4-52422199
186
0.01.02.53.53.84.04.85.57.39.37.35.84.83.82.53.04.04.55.05.37.59.8
14.315.8
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 700W N100m August 17 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. "A Slope Elevation4003753503253002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75•100-125•150•175•200•225•250
44321323452211232112111
14852224555542-22-2-147532
221102123310-10120-1-10-1-10
-10100000101110-1-1-1-101000
-80
-206531
-4-27-121208
11107-2-2-5-9-91
-6-5-2-2
-12.3-10.3-10.3-5.3-6.8-8.0-8.8-9.0-8.0-1.31.8-1.3-1.3-3.3-6.0-8.5
-10.3-9.8-9.3-8.0-5.8-3.5-3.8-2.3-1.0-0.50.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie TwpLine: 800WLocation of Receiver relative to Transmitter: SCoil Spacing 100mDate: August 15 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. V, Slope Elevation5505255004754504254003753503253002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275
112675987222230346333433141121
-7-5-3467766322245555222254354442
0105537750011111341122120200-10
-7-2-10111110000010000000000 .00100
0007-218182835-15-9
-10135
1617-11
-12-16-3
-185135
15-4-5-500
0.00.00.00.01.81.35.8
10.317.326.022.320.017.517.818.519.823.828.027.828.025.021.020.315.817.017.318.019.323.022.020.819.519.519.5
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: McVrttie TwpLine: 900WLocation of Receiver relative to Transmitter: NCoil Spacing 100mDate: August 15 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. "/o Slope Elevation5755505255004754504254003753503253002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75100125•150175•200225250
82234379
121533462233223532235333
-238444455531223544532112444446
60002257
101312241112112321014212
40100001000-1000100000-100000001
00-8
-18-18-5-5
-24-8
-60151318186
-14-10-4-49
1322203-2-4
-1197-5121010
-3.8-3.8-3.8-1.82.87.38.59.8
15.817.832.829.025.821.316.815.318.821.322.323.321.017.812.37.36.57.08.0
10.88.56.88.05.02.50.0
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp1000 WS100mAugust 151999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP525500475450425400375350325300275250225200175150125100755025
0-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325
533322222233432242455114122611
-1
6443343332333444563000154444444
31111101111221002122300201141
-1-2
888 Hz. tt Slope Elevation 0.0
1000000000000000010
-1-1-100o ,001001
135
13-121725
10-45
15-4-41510
13
-9-9
-27-15
028176
-2-5
-23-3-2
-110
3.34.57.84.89.09.5
10.813.312.313.517.316.315.319.021.521.822.520.318.011.37.57.58.0
10.010.312.013.513.011.86.05.34.82.02.0
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake'Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1100 W N100m August 15 1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. "/o Slope Elevation4254003753503253002752502252001751501251007550250
-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350-375
22115433522323434344324221322
344443333444442-1-10-11444532232
0001421230111222212120211
-1201
000000000000000
-1-1-1-1-100000 .0000
-21-19-17-15-20-17-21419-8-6-410937
30000
-15-25-110152296-321
-6.3-1.03.88.0
11.816.821.021.518.013.315.316.817.815.313.012.310.53.03.03.03.06.8
13.013.313.013.09.33.81.50.00.80.30.0
BASE STATION NOTI Crosby Lake Grid Mcvittie Tp.
All base stations along Station nT
-1400 57429-1350 57369-1300 57376-1250 57331-1200 57360-1150 57254-1100 57253-1050 57264-1000 57154-950 57307-900 57361-850 57356-800 57340-750 57318-700 57286-650 57283-600 57296-550 57270-500 57267-450 57251-400 57230-350 57239-300 57242-250 57241-200 57251-150 57250-100 57243-50 57242O 57235
50 57233100 57249150 57198200 57216250 57230300 57238350 57365400 57269450 57229
32D04NE2019 2.19923
REPORTMCVITTIE 020
ON
MaxMin EM
MAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD SURVEY(September 1999)
Crosby Lake PropertyMcvittie Township
Larder Lake Mining DivisionNortheastern Ontario
NTS 32D/4
C-
UTM Grid Zone 17, NAD. 27
For
Martin Harrington
^ o D pOBlN'oQN S
DougJ-a^/Robinson P. Doug Robinson Consulting
PROVINCIAL RECORDING OFFICE - SUDBURY
RECEIVEDNOV251999
CM P.M.
32D04NE2019 2.19923 MCVITTIE 02 OC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l. O SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS................ . ....... . . . ...... . l
3.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
4.0 REGIONAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
5.0 EXPLORATION RATIONAL.............. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 2MaxMin Survey . . . . . . . . . . . ....................... 2Magnetic Survey .. ................ . ... ... ... . ( ^. 2
O *.l6.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^v v ̂. sS. . . . 3
Grid ............................. \, ̂ i ......... 3Magnetic Survey .. . . .... .... -^. . .. .\ . T. .... . .... 3Topographic Survey ........ .Tp .!". .. ....... ..... 4
7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Magnetic Survey ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4MaxMin Survey .............. .... .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . 5
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
9.0 REFERENCES........................................... 8
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS . .. . . . . . . . 9
LIST OF TABLES S FIGURES
Location Map including Regional Geology (After Chart A, MRC No3)
Compilation Map (Magnetic S MaxMin) Scale 1:5000, Lines 1100-100W
Compilation Map (Magnetic S MaxMin)Scale 1:5000, Lines 1700-100W
Compilation Map (Magnetic, MaxMin and Topographic Features) Scale 1:5000, Lines 1700-100W
Contoured Magnetic Total Field Map Scale 1:5000
MaxMin and Topographic Notes
Base Station List
l. O SUMMARY
This exploration project of the Crosby Lake north of Larder Lake, Ontario included MaxMin and total field strength magnetic surveys on a grid cut by Martin Harrington. The author supervised the geophysics and prepared this report. Positive results of this exploration program includes the identification of exploration targets and the identification of structural trends that may define structural breaks of the that control gold mineralization. ,-,(
2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property is centred at 5334200 mN and 0600000 mE (NTS 32D/4) , approximately 7.5 km north east of Larder Lake, Ontario.
Road access north from Highway 66 is by the gravel Larder Station Road, one kilometre northeast of Larder Lake. The Larder Station road crosses lines 700W-1100W and intersects the base line at approximately 625W.
3.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION
The property is relatively flat with moderately sloping hills. Relief is generally less than 35 metres. Approximately 25-50*1; of the surveyed area is outcrop area or shallow overburden. Boreal forest provides the main forest cover.
Doug Robinson Consulting
4.O REGIONAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The property is located in Kinojevis volcanics 4 km north of the Larder Lake Break.
The property geology consists predominantly of Kinojevis Group Mg and Fe rich tholeiitic basalt and gabbro and Timiskaming sediment units (Map 2628).
-, f~j, *--t \* :#
'- * ' i1
5.0 EXPLORATION RATIONAL ~v l\ :)•* -f.. ;. -i
*~. ' r
MaxMin SurveyThe MaxMin survey targeted:a. structural breaks of the type that control gold
mineralization in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lakearea (frequency 3555 Hz) and
b. stockwork-massive sulphide mineralization(frequency 888 and 3555 Hz).
The 3555 Hz frequency responds to both structural breaks and stockwork-massive sulphide mineralization at shallow depths. The 888 Hz responds predominantly to stockwork- massive sulphide mineralization and graphite. A null response of the 888 Hz frequency relative to moderate to strong 3555 Hz response eliminates to stockwork-massive sulphides and graphite as the cause of EM responses.
Disseminated sulphides that commonly host gold mineralization are not expected to respond to an EM survey. Isolated sulphide grains that are not connected do not generate a detectable response.
Magnetic SurveyThis magnetic survey targeted alteration associated with deformation zones that commonly control Au deposits in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake-Cadillac-Val d'Or Gold Belt. These deposits tend to be located in and near altered deformation zones within 10 km of the Larder Lake-Cadillac Deformation Zone. This survey targeted alteration and associated gold mineralization. These alteration zones tend to be magnetically neutral
Doug Robinson Consulting
(commonly lows) in areas where magnetic minerals are replaced by non-magnetic Fe-Mg-Ca carbonates as part of the alteration and mineralization. (Secondary magnetite in intense silicification can cause magnetic highs within alteration zones that otherwise have low magnetic fields).
6.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Geophysical surveys were performed on lines 1700W-1200W and the data integrated with a previous surveys conducted for Jonpol Explorations Limited.
Results of the topographic, MaxMin 3555 s 888 Hz and magnetic surveys are plotted on 1:5000 scale profiles. The magnetic profiles with an expanded vertical scale of 100 nT/cm are plotted on separate sheets. The magnetic data is supplied in a 1:5000 scale contour map. A 1:5000 scale compilation map is also provided.
GridMartin Harrington cut a metric grid consisting of 100 spaced lines with pickets spaced at 25 m intervals. The base line is approximately azimuth 1130 .
Magnetic SurveyThe author of this report conducted a total field strength magnetic survey of lines 1700W-1200W September 7, 1999. A Scintrex Envimag in walkmag mode was used. Magnetic readings at 2 second intervals were measured along all lines. This interval rendered readings spaced at approximately two meter intervals.
Base stations were established along Base Line 0+OON at 100 m intervals. Each base station reading was established standing on the east side of the picket while facing north. See appendices for base station values.
Doug Robinson Consulting
The survey traverses were interrupted at the base line for base station readings. Magnetic readings of the grid lines were corrected relative to the base stations. Interpretation was performed from 1:5,000 profiles. A
1:5,000 contour plan is provided to supplement the profiles.
Topographic SurveyTopography measurements by Suunto clinometer were recorded in percent and used to maintain the transmitter and receiver coils coplanar during the survey. This process was used to eliminate topographic noise that can result in weak responses being overwhelmed by topographic effects. Weak responses encountered appear to have real sources; either due to bedrock features or surficial deposits.
The topography was plotted at 1:5000 scale on the EM- Magnetic profile sheets and the notes were included in the typed EM notes included in this report.
MaxMin SurveyThis MaxMin EM survey was performed on lines 1600W-1300W September 6, 1999. MaxMin, magnetic and topography profiles were plotted in stacked format to facilitate interpretation of the responses. The locations of EM responses were transferred to magnetic profiles and 1:5000 compilation maps included in this report.
Typed MaxMin notes are included in the report.
7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Magnetic SurveyThe magnetic signature of the grid consists of relatively flat magnetic relief. Several magnetic highs reported below, may be caused by mafic flows or intrusives or Timiskaming sediments containing X-5%
Doug Robinson Consulting
magnetite.
A Prominent magnetic high extends from line 1600W-400W between 100-160N.
A prominent magnetic high from 1700W-300S extends to 1400W-486S. A prominent MaxMin response accompanies this magnetic high.
Another weaker magnetic high with a very weak MaxMin response extends along the base line from Line 1700W- 1100W.
Other magnetic highs include 1700W-270S to 1400W-230S and 1600W-225S to 800W-270S.
MaxMin SurveyThe 888 hz frequency was quiet, detecting a few, very weak bedrock responses expected from sulphides and/or graphite; the targeted host for volcanogenic base metal deposits. This indicates IP can be used to effectively map disseminated pyrite concentrations possibly hosting gold mineralization.
The 3555 hz frequency produced numerous weak to strong responses indicating bedrock structure or subsurface topographic feature are present on most lines as tabulated below:
Line 1600W
K 325S-375S 3555 Hz Moderate QP response888 Hz Weak QP response.
Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.Possible weak contribution from minorsulphides.
D 012S-012N 3555 Hz Weak QP response.Probable topographic feature.
Doug Robinson Consulting
Possible bedrock feature.
Line 15QOWK 394S-426S 3555 Hz Strong QP response.
888 Hz Very weak QP response.Probable bedrock structure and subsurfacetopographic feature.
D 012S-012N 3555 Hz Weak QP response.Probable topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
Line 1400W
K 486S 3555 Hz Weak QP response.Possible topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
D OOON-025N 3555 Hz Very weak QP response?Possible topographic feature.Possible bedrock feature.
Line 1300WNo responses.
The 3555 Hz responses are probably caused by a combination of weakly conductive bedrock structures, lithological contacts and wet overburden located in bedrock depressions.
Response "K" on lines 1600W-1500W is a moderate quadrature phase response that appears to weaken to the south east. Line 1700W was not surveyed.
Response "D" is weak and is located at the north edge of a weak magnetic high. This may reflect a conductivity contrast across a geological contact or a possible bedrock structure.
Response "D" appearj to be one of three parallel responses (B, C, and D) . These Responses may splay
Doug Robinson Consulting
from a possible fault along the base line.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Favourable MaxMin responses identified probable bedrock features that may be geological breaks. These should be tested for fault controlled alteration that may host gold mineralization.
Response "K" on lines 1600W and 1500W is the most favourable target and drilling is recommended on this target.
A dipole dipole Induced Polarisation survey ("a" spacing 25m) is recommended on line 1700W.
Doug Robinson Consulting
9.0 REFERENCES
Savage, W.S., 1964. Mineral Resources and Mining Propertiesin the
Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Area. Ontario Department of Mines, Mineral Resources Circular No 3. p77 k Chart A.
MERQ-OGS, 1983. Lithostratigraphic Map of the Abitibi Subprovince;
Ontario Geological Survey/Ministere de 1'Energie etdes Resources, Quebec; scale 1:500 000.
Map 2628. Precambrian Geology, Larder Lake Area. Ontario Geological Survey. Scale 1:50,000
Doug Robinson Consulting
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Douglas Robinson, of 24 Victoria Avenue, Swastika, Ontario hereby certify that:
1. I am a registered professional Engineer of the province of Ontario, No. 39322011.
2. I am a graduate of Queen's University in Kingston Ontario with an Honours Bachelor of Science, Geological Engineering 1975, andNorthern College, School of Mines in Haileybury, Ontario, 1970.
3. I have been practising my profession since graduation.
4. The information contained in this report is the result of work done by myself and the references cited.
5. I own no direct or indirect interests in and do not expect to receive any interests in the Crosby Lake Property.
.-'* * ^^3*0
Resp
:fougla^xRobinson, P. EngA September 15, 1999
Doug Robinson Consulting
GENERALIZED GEOLOGY
Cobalt sedimentary rocks.
TRIM E,j^,S^ '' ' - , ' ,'*
;,Jx: x,,,—; .•r; .j•'-'-;s'rV:r.a;.g'^v-'C:
••'•-'•i;^-":-.^ O/rfer sedimentary am yiZ&iZi volcanic rocks :!:^V\M^:- (Timiskaming series).
Acid and basic volcanic rocks and undifferentialed dioriles.
3)——STOP. C. l. M. FIELD TRIP. 1967
Properties indicated by numbers on the mop are named under the Property List of the ODM Mineral Resources Circular No. 3.
For detailed geology of townships see list of Geological Mops in circular.
SOURCE OF INFORMATION
Compiled by W. S Savage, 1963.
Location Map including Regional Geology (After Chart A, MRC No3)
o8
2o o m
1•fr
1O
2 O O
- - csl
|
O
V)
8
w8CM
(0
8n
CO
8TJ-
50 0^50 100
(meters)
Contour Interval: Automat
1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W 100W
x v ^ irG
5^ i . -4- f - Xft 4-4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4-
\~5t90\
•4- - - -- N-s** 4-4-4-4-4-4-j ipioZ- r j
-| - - | - t l t -H -H -j
i J,
ij 7.52. rp j i? e--- -T0 ^-^^ pJ 1 ?' ^Je ? -z^5 -p/ ?^5 ^9200 - - 4- x * - '1
tj -- 1 1 ? /P' 177 t t - t t "."-t:: t 3 ? il B — — - ^~ — — ~ ^~ — i "— — ~ M R•^----- -f -f -- ,t 4- ^T R t
i ^ /L 1i ^^ff oL8 P^ OZ5-
Ho'3 iik ol2. ^^^-^ ~"JX--y;0 '8^tr-6 - - u oii , rv y . -^j j-^— -^ j^N p) -T-^ joz,^ ^1H - - rv^ T a(5 |0 MOOO M "Jl:^^r " G :a-^. i ^F-^^OGO L^" - o^ 050 \
-t1 i - - - i \X \ - "J- i ^- J--^ - "^ 1 \\ 1
f- -k f-'t ^! \ |4 } - L- ~" f - T 4- 4- f
1 ID?- -4*--*l j J250
-i | 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- J"- --fi"
1 It i
-4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- - i-
1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W 100W
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp.COMPILATION
Magnetic and MaxMin (EM) c
SCINTREX ENVIMAP plot by Doualas Robinson. Ooug Robinson Consulting
O)o o2
g IT Magnetic High0 T~
1| Magnetic Low
o J R Magnetic Reversal (?)2
L -j Magnetic Break
04 1321 g T MaxMin Responsez ..j) Bar shows extent
a2V Frequency 3500 Hz Location fi limits 224, 232
III. IP - in phase g QP - quadrature phase o -z.
1
-- . ^0\ 2j
oo2^S
o w
M 3
y)
I3j?
OlD
/)
^ O
n
\Declination: 12 Decrees West
1700 600W 400W 300W 200W 100W
100W
50 O 50 100J—""^(meters)
Contour Interval: Automatic
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp.COMPILATION
Magnetic and MaxMin (EM)
SCINTREX ENV1UAP plot by Douglas Robinson. Pouq Robinson Consulting Declination: 12 Dtgreo West
6oo1700 1500 Woo I30o 1200 1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 4OOW 300W 200W 100W
500 4
*SOO -h
300 4.
2.00
too --
100
ZOO
3OO
4oo -.
500 -
600 --
Crosby Lak?
1100W 1000W 900W 200W 100W
50 O SO 1003*"*^^*^^^^ (matan) J
Contour Interval: Automatic
^Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp.COMPILATION
Magnetic and MaxMin (EM)
SCINTREX CNV7UAP plot by Douglas Robinson. Douq Robinson Consulting Declination: 12 Dv^rcei West
1700W 1600W 1500W 1400W 130OW 1200W 1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300VV 200W
17CX)W 1600W 1500W 1400W 1300W 1200W 1100W 1000W 900W 800W 700W 600W 500W 400W 300W 200W
100 100
Contour Interval: 25 nT
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp.MAGNETIC TOTAL FIELD STRENGTH
nanoTeslasSCWTKEX ENVtUAP plot bv Douglas Robinson. Douo Roblmon 12 D*grMl
50.0
0.0
D.O
-700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300
3555 Hz.
00 -6
00 -6
DO -5
00 -5
00 -4
00 -4
DO -3
00 -3
00 -2O/ 1
' 7u \
88
00 -2i V. \
00 -1P a- Oif
8 Hz.
00 -1P ---*---.w.r
00 (IP
00 (\D
) K
) K
)0 2(
DO 2(
DO 3(
DO 3(
- tu
20- 10
0- -10- -20
-40
)0
r 40
20100
- -10-20
DO
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
Av \ ^"~ ^ ^^^-A ^ -A~Vpsf7^1^v^^J-V|pAM
* r^/VvMT\^ __ AA/ -^-sA /^
Y
ri
^J
00 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 4(
o/ouu.u
57600.0
57400.0
57200.0
57000.0
56800.0 DO
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1700W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topogra
"—t t t i -j
phy
*~— H ——
-600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200
3.0
0.0
300
3555 Hz.
-6
-6
•H t
00 -5
t — h l -
00 -5
-^4-lI~~*
37
00 -4
00 -4
. — -H1.
5
00
—— HtT— q
00
^ — 1 —— 1
k--*---^
O-
k- —— 1- - -H
K --'
3-3
-3
^-*..t-.-
2*5
00
00
t^;
-2
-2
^Nt^*^*^
00 -1——— %IP -"-K
888 Hz.
00 -1i Of. ID i
^t— -1-
o
00C/.ODTOUr
•~~r—
00. - . oz.no
-**"
n.
,
~-.
i
(
a
(
'
x
)
B^
)
-f — *•*'
0/2.
1C
~V*
K
)0 2(
)0 2(
)0 3C
)0 3(
- 20- 10
0 -10-20
O rt
-40
)0
r 40
on
20- 10- 0
-10- -20
-40
)0
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800-^00.0 -500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1600W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topography
-6
-6
00 -500
*^
00
-400 -300
v i i i-4---
VZ6
-500
,.
-600
i---.
Jj
— i— *J^-t-^-"
39V't
-200 -100
3555 Hz.
^Ilt^*^*--
-400 -300
^ 4--.
-500
V
—4-
, t ^ i,
0
-'t^t-^-"
-200 -100A o/ in ± o/ f\r*
888 Hz.
-400 -300
Total
.-"~ \i
^00.0 -500.0
\^^
- i i i -
^ . — *
100
(
0
-200 -100——— 1 ——— -fclP ---^-- "/fcOP
)0l2.
200
100
- 0.0
- .*;n n300
... /in
200
~~ *—^— ̂ i* ;
0 100
on
2010
- 0 -10-20
AC\
300
An
200
Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
S
-400.0 -300.0
"^"-^ —— ̂ A AV1l^i ""(^y-'- v-'-v, A ^i
i
-200.0 -100.0 0.0
-
;j
1 .
100.0
ll
i
^\r^T]
200.0 30
, onou
20100-10-20 -30
A n— r -tu
300
57800.0
57600.0
57400.0
57200.0
57000.0
56800.0 0.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1500W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topogra phy
-600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200
3.0
0.0
300
3555 Hz.
t 1
(
~*--K'' '
)y06
-— 1— K-—*---^" T
U^+^t-^-H —— 1—— *— *~~ —— *—— t- —— * —— 1
OOO
* —— ~t~~~-4, - ' t
-Q 02.5
- t\J
- 20100
- -10-20
-600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300
^*—±--*- — t— h— t-^4 ^ + ,1 —— ̂ —— H—— *——^ ^———^Li^i -4 ——
- HU
- 20- 10- 0- -10
-20
-600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
^-^ /V N^-- -^K^^^l
rv r- |VJ
v-' l)\ \
"\ ~~ ———y-J
1
\
TVJ\
\
o/ouu
57600
57400
57200
57000
^RRnn^00.0 -500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1400W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topography
J.— 1 ——— *- -q. —
-500 -4
r^
-500 -4
: —— t— H —— i^— J
00 -3
--^——^—— K^
DO -3
00 -2
r—— t--*--h--
DO -2
1 — -\ — i — i — i
00 -1
^3^4— *~-
DO -1— i — *
— i— i — h-.,
00 (
3555 Hz.
k— ̂ --t-4- -
DO C,IP —— -K —— *(
) K
.—*— *— *
) K
)P
— *
30 2(
)0 2C
30 3(
)0 3C
30 4(
)0 4C
- -JV.
0.0
30
-40
-20- 10- 0 --10--20
--40
)0
.0
888 Hz. 40 30 20 10 O-10-20-30-40
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800"10.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1300W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Topography50.0
0:0
-50.0-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100 200 300 400
3555 Hz.40
20 10 O-10-20
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100
888 Hz.
200 300 400
40302010
-10-20-30-40
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 100•fclP ----i--
200 300 400
Total Magnetic Field Strength (nT)
-400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0
57800.0
57600.0
57400.0
57200.0
57000.0
56800.0400.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp Line: 1200 W
MaxMin: 100 m. Coil Seperation Magnetometer: Walkmag Mode (2 Seconds)
Total Magnetic Field Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1700W
58400.01:5000 s :aie
58200.0
58000.0
57800.0
57600.0
57400.0
-700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100
57200.0
57000.0
56800.0100 200 300 400
Total Magnetic F, ' Strength (1 OOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1600W
58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
56800-700.0 -600.0 -500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0
Total Magnetic ' d Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1500W
58400.0
58200.0
58000.0
57800.0
57600.0
57400.0
1:50005 :ale
V2657200.0
57000.0
O
56800.0-700.0 -600.0 -500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0
Total Magnetic F j Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1400W
58400
58200
58000
i :5000 scale
57800
57600
57400
57200
57000
t1186 ooo lo] OZ5
56800-700.0 -600.0 -500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0
Total Magnetic F l Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1300W
58400
58200
58000
57800
57600
57400
1:5000 Se ale
57200
57000
56800-500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0
Total Magnetic F , Strength (lOOnT/cm) Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1200W
58400.0
58200.0
58000.0
57800.0
57600.0
1:5000 S :ale
57400.0
57200.0
57000.0
56800,0-500.0 -400.0 -300.0 -200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1600W S100m
September 06,1999
Station100755025
0-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350-375-400-425-450-475-500-525-550-575-600-625
IP 3555 Hz.
54354553
3.5276
6.564
2.53433343334
QP 3555 Hz.
0-2-1-2
-0.52.5
7554
3.544
2.5-2-6-6-7
-1.559632
3.53
IP 888 Hz.
421323
3.51.51.5
154
4.542112111
2.51
0.512
QP 888 Hz.
-1-1-1-1-101
0.50.5
00000
-1-2-2-2-1
0.51.5
10000
07o Slope
-20-20
O O O O
2310
5-5
-10-20-12 15
-20-8 O O O O
20 5 5 O O
-5 O O 5
Elevation0.0
-5.0-10.0-10.0-10.0-10.0-10.0
-4.3-1.8-0.5-1.8-4.3-9.3
-12.3-8.5
-13.5-15.5-15.5-15.5-15.5-15.5-10.5-9.3-8.0-8.0-8.0-9.3-9.3-9.3-8.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie TwpLine: 1500WLocation of Receiver relative to Transmitter: NCoil Spacing 100mDate: September 6,1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. "/o Slope Elevation1251007550250
-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350-375-400-425-450-475-500-525-550-575
556532
2.533
3.54424
2.51.5343
3.533
2.525
52.51.5
1358
2.53.52.5
13.53577
113-3-3
-1.5-2165
234
3.50.50.50.51.5
1222
0.52
1.5012
1.5211113
0.50
-0.5-0.5
00.5
1000
-0.500
0.51120
-1.5-1.5
-1-1
-0.51
0.5
15152215-300-507270-5-801010108000-8
-150
-100
16.813.09.33.80.00.80.80.82.02.00.3-0.3-2.0-2.0-0.81.31.3
-1.3-3.8-6.3-8.3-8.3-8.3-8.3-6.3-2.5-2.50.00
Grid:Line:Location of Receiver relative to Transmitter:Coil SpacingDate:
Station
Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie Twp 1400 W S100m
September 06,1999
n125100755025
0-25-50-75
-100-125-150-175-200-225-250-275-300-325-350-375-400-425-450-475-500
IP 3555 Hz.
22.5
56.5
5433
4.5433323
2.553344
4.535
QP 3555 HZ.
52.52.5
31.5
44
3.52.5
3335445
1.23
-0.6-1.80.8-6-3
0.3
IP 888 Hz.
-103
4.532
1.52.5
33
1.5221
2.51.82.82.22.4
21.82.6
01.6
QP 888 Hz.
0.5000
-0.50000000
0.40.30.3
50.4
0-0.6
-1-0.4
-2-1.2-0.8
"/o Slope
010-5
-22-580600
-1010100
-5-15
-31
-1-500002
1010
Elevation0.00.02.51.3
-4.3-5.5-3.5-3.5-2.0-2.0-2.0-4.5-2.00.50.5
-0.8-4.5-5.3-5.0-5.3-6.5-6.5-6.5-6.5-6.5-6.0-3.5-1.0
Grid: Crosby Lake Grid: Mcvittie TwpLine: 1300WLocation of Receiver relative to Transmitter: NCoil Spacing 100mDate: September 6,1999
Station IP 3555 Hz. QP 3555 Hz. IP 888 Hz. QP 888 Hz. V, Slope Elevation1251007550250
-25-50-75•100125•150•175•200•225250275300325•350375400425450475
335323
2.24
3.83
1.833
2.53
3.587675
41.83
2.52.25
3.23.53.23
3.83.53.53.55
2.52
2.503
2.5
0.81.23.51.30.21.20.22.21.8
1-0.21.81.2
11.426545
3.8
0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.20.40.20.10.20
0.20
0.22
0.4-0.2-0.4-0.2-0.8-0.2-0.2
01020100
-10-3-80-2-30-5-2-28
22200
-200
25-100
12.512.510.05.02.52.55.05.87.87.88.39.09.0
10.310.811.39.33.8-1.3-1.33.83.8-2.50.00
7-Sep-99All base stations along Station nT
-1700 57244-1600 75243-1500 57363-1400 57429-1350 57369-1300 57376-1250 57331-1200 57360-1150 57254-1100 57253-1050 57264-1000 57154
-950 57307-900 57361-850 57356-800 57340-750 57318-700 57286-650 57283-600 57296-550 57270-500 57267-450 57251-400 57230-350 57239-300 57242-250 57241-200 57251-150 57250-100 57243
-50 57242O 57235
50 57233100 57249150 57198200 57216250 57230300 57238350 57365400 57269450 57229
VJ Jntario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land
Mining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990
Transaction Number (office use)
Assessment Files Research Imaging
isection 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the Mining Ad, isment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this ern Development and Mines, 3rd Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury,
32D04NE2019 2.19923 MCVITTIE 900
Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. - Please type or print in ink.
1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name J L. i ' i
AjcjrT" wn H Q \-\~\r\cfror\Address ' . '
A^/r-kla^c/ Lake. O H PA// IT iName
Address
Client Number . ., - , t 14-201(0
Telephone Number ^ ^-, — . , ^1oS-5(*l- &5ZOFax Number
Client Number
Telephone Number
Fax Number
2. Type of work performed: Check (^) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)
Physical: drilling stripping, trenching and associated assays
Rehabilitation
Work Type (^ ^o -fc.C,V\ fr\Ct
Dates Work From o Performed Day "7 | Month O | 1
Global Positioning System Data (if available)
? l l jnf\Cfqr*GsOrr\G.r^(' Svt-vfy
Wql rn.n Survey
iTo
rear ^\ Day *] | Month T | Year 7 T
Township/Area KA, //' -hrlp
M or G-Plan Number — . ,-C? 5)fe5
Office UseCommodityTotal S Value of Work Claimed *? S VONTS Reference
f ) f}Mmmg Division^ ̂ ^ ^^ j^JL^Resident Geologist , , District c^JV tffc-J-CL (LdL t^Q-^j^^i
Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.
3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name
Address 34-V?*
Q// PoK /To
Telephone NumberIDS'-Fax Number
Name Telephone Num
Address RECEIVED\ AKE
Fax Number
Name MINING DIVISION Telephone Numb
Address MOV 24 m Fax Number
4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agentla
, do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in(Print Name)'
this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent
hone Number70^34
0241 (03197) PROVINCIAL RECORDING OFFICE -SUDBU
R E C E ! V
P.M.
5. Wo'fr'to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining and Where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link must accompany this orm.
Mining Claim Number. Or if /vork was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.
ag
eg
eg
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TB 7827
1234567
1234568
U2 6^o\/;u S30^/aa 5-4- 77 '/jujrf IB 'aas^ 30 '
Column Totals
Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.
16 ha
12
2
Z.
1^
l
3c?
*o
Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.
S26.825
0
S 8,892
^03
3(000
900HI!.20^
9,8^0
Value of work applied to this claim.
N/A
524,000
S 4,000
Value of work assigned to other mining claims.
S24,000
0
0
Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date
52,825
0
S4,892
I^o33ioO
?00
(HI2o^(o
1^0
, do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Print Full Name)
subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim
where the work was done.
Signature of Recorded Ho thorized in Writing Date
6. Instruction for cutting back credits that are not approved.
in the boxes below to show how you wish toSome of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check prioritize the deletion of credits:
H 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated^D 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, workingD 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declara\icD 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or i
Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.
For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp
0241 (03/97)
RECEIVED tfcRDERlAKE
MINING DIVISION
Deemed Approved Date
Date Approved
Date Notification Sent
Total Value of Credit Approved
Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)
Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
Transaction Number (office use)
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, this information is a public record. This information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to a Provincial Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 3rd Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5.
Work Type
FKQOhefoM&'feh ^/rK?y
/TtaX-AUn S()tve^
L\T\e C^ifinQ
Units of workDepending on the type of work, list the number of hours/day worked, metres of drilling, kilometres of grid line, number of samples, etc.
/^6#Am
l03tfkvr\
Ik-, km
Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).
Transportation Costs
Food and Lodging Costs
Cost Per Unit of work
* lor/**
* ZSI-ftm
* 3f3VU
Total Value of Assessment Work
Total Cost
.nts
1&84*
Si a\
1^0
Calculations of Filing Discounts:
1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 10007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 5007o of the Total
Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:
TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 s Total S value of worked claimed.
Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statedverification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarificatikn^sViot made, the^or part of the assessment work submitted. \ vin\l ?S
Certification verifying costs:
l. ___
dayf of a request for ister may reject all
, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may reasonably(please print full name)
be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on the accompanying
Declaration of Work form as(recorded holder, agent, or state company position with signing authority)
l am authorized to make this certification.
. 0212(03/97)
RECEIVEDLARDER IAKE
MINING DIVISION
NOV 24
Signature DateAW-
OntarioMinistry of Ministere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines
Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road
February 25, 2000 6th FloorSudbury, Ontario
MARTYN SPENCER HARRINGTON P3E 6B566 FOURTH STREETKIRKLAND LAKE, ONTARIO Telephone: (888) 415-9845P2N-1T1 Fax: (877)670-1555
Visit our website at: www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm
Dear Sir or Madam: Submission Number: 2.19923
Status Subject: Transaction Number(s): W9980.00634 Approval After Notice
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact LUCILLE JEROME by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 14604
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number: 2.19923
Date Correspondence Sent: February 25, 2000 Assessor: LUCILLE JEROME
First Claim Number1225301
Township(s) l Area(s)MCVITTIE
StatusApproval After Notice
Approval Date
February 25, 2000
Transaction NumberW9980.00634
Section:14 Geophysical MAG 14 Geophysical EM
The revisions outlined in the Notice dated February 16, 2000 have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form accompanying this submission.
Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, ON
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):F. J. SharpleyVIRGINIA TOWN, ONTARIO
MARTYN SPENCER HARRINGTON KIRKLAND LAKE, ONTARIO
Page: 1Correspondence ID: 14604
LO
Katrine Tp.LMfffCJVEMEffT DISTRICT OFMJWICJPALIT^ OF I.ARDrr?
l (i ""'"'" pQ/ - '-Y.
\ '——L- -T r
H IP? ^-4—— —— —— .'—— ——
1226198'Coo f e L.
122519^Spectacle 1225200 l l
122&6901225302
12223
.HI.*. '— -- iiI'll v loi
r- ,*~t' i
PiorJ Q*flWlf 1'561780 ,'
Northwest Bay
OF LARDER LAKE
OF WININO" CLAIMl W(TH)M TOWN Or UARDW LAKE - TQ SEC. !7(ft] OF MINING ACT [ K.|.0.lfl7O|
Hearst Tp. M( CARRY
LEGEND
HIGHWAY ANO HMLMf
O T Ml H ROA1.I';
SURVEYED LINFSIOWNLH IPii, BASL L INI S 1 1 CLOTS MININf, D AIM?* PARCH S, f TC
uhsuRvt yeo L INESLOT MNFS - PA RTF l tU'lirNflArlY MlNINc.Cl AIMS FTr
HAIL WAY A NO Rlf.HTO* WAY -*
UTIllTYUNFSNONPFRFNNIAI STflFAM -
rLDOniNfi OR FLOODING Ffl.iHTT, -
SUBDIVISION OR TOMPOSITF Pi AN ' "
Ri tt HVATION'iORIGINAL SHOH El .
MAHSM OR MUSK E Ci
*iz^
,. A .rA^ J^,AI J*
V
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PAfENT.SUfT ACF ft MINING HliiHTS
. SlJRl ACTl HltJHTSONLV .....
, M+NINf, HtGMTSUNI Y .
LIASF , SlJKI A i; t 4 MINING MIGHTS ,
, MININQ RIGHTS ONl Y
or OCCUPATION . .. onor n IN COUNCIL . .R l Sf R VAT l ON
CANCfl L EH SAND A
SYM3OL
O?) " r 4) (R* K o or 0
eC or f
B. .... B
L 1* w Toc
NDT|: MttsriMa WlO^TS IH P^ptCF-.S fATfMTfl) PHlON 'O MAY n 191.1 VESTiD i** O**iOiM*l ^ATI^TH iv IMF Pi'01 ir
r' , fi * O 14^0 fM^p 3*0. Cfi" fi i
SCALE : 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS
4000 uooo
MI L 1 K M t [S
SEC. 35 W-LL-P1632/99 ONT MAY 11/99 M+S
TOWNSHIP
M'VITTIEM.N B ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
KIRKLAND LAKEMINING DIVISION
LARDER LAKELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
TIMtSKAMING
Ministryof
Ont.irioResources Branch
DttiSEPTEMBER I9B4
NvriHr
G-3I63
LO
O
F m
THE INFOflMWT' THAT APPEARS Or MAP HAS BEL 4 COM. LEP FROM VKn.OUS BOURCEF AND ACCURACY IS NQ - GUARANTEEft? FHOffE WISHING TO STAKE M(N ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WTM THE -JttMlNn RECORDER. MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, PDR AD- OITIONrtL ^FORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HERECN.
B
O)32D04NE2019 2.19923 MCVITTIE 200
copy OF THIS MVLAHT' nw
.UBBI .ijn
RECEIVED
On fa//
32D04NE2019 2.19923 MCVITTIE 210