journal reading in universities: comparing the u.s. and australia (a case study)
DESCRIPTION
Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study). Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee [email protected]. Tenopir & King Data From:. 25,000+ scientists, engineers, physicians, and social scientists 1977 to the present University and non-university settings - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Carol TenopirUniversity of Tennessee
Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia
(A Case Study)
![Page 2: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Tenopir & King Data From:
• 25,000+ scientists, engineers, physicians, and social scientists
• 1977 to the present• University and non-university settings• Mostly North America• Recent surveys at 3 U.S. universities,
pediatricians, astronomers• UNSW staff and students in 2004, UQ
2005
![Page 3: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
150172
188216
0
50
100
150
200
250
1977 1984 1993 2000-03
Ave. Articles Read per Univ. ScientistA
vera
ge
nu
mb
er
of a
rtic
les
rea
d p
er
scie
ntis
t
Year of Studies
![Page 5: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Average Reading per Faculty member
186215
197216
175206
219
0
50
100
150
200
250
Num
ber o
f Rea
ding
s
U ofTennessee
U ofPittsburgh
Drexel AllScientists
All-Non-Scientists
All US UNSW
![Page 6: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UNSW Respondents
21%
12%
6%10%
22%
29%Medicine/health
Social Science
Sciences
Aviation/Engineering
Humanities
Other
![Page 7: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Reading Varies by Subject Discipline and workplace
• Univ. medical• Pediatricians• Univ Scientists• All Scientists• Soc Sci/Psych• Engineers
• ~322 articles/year• ~180 articles/year• ~216 articles/year• ~130 articles/year• ~191 articles/year• ~111 articles/year
![Page 8: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
UNSW Reading by Subject
• Medical/Health• Engineering/Aviation• Sciences• Social Sciences• Humanities
• ~265• ~238• ~248• ~206• ~128
![Page 9: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Print & Electronic Serial Titles in Australian and New Zealand Academic
Libraries
Source: CAUL Statistics http://www.caul.edu.au/stats/caul2002-pub.xls
Print and Electronic Titles
Electronic Titles
Electronic
253,627
17%
1,245,424
83%
Individual Electronic Serial Titles
Titles Within a Single Publisher CollectionTitles Within aggregations
43,301
4% 78,385
6%
1,123,738
90%
![Page 10: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Reading from Print or Electronic
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
US all ('00-'03) UT ('00) Pitt ('03) Drexel ('02) UNSW ('04)
Print Electronic
![Page 11: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• 18% of these are read on the screen
• 82% are printed out on paper for reading
UNSW Readings: 67.3% Electronic
![Page 12: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Print or Electronic
80%
20%
Electronic
81%
19%
63%
37%
Astronomers
Pediatricians
University Science
67%
32%
UNSW
![Page 13: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Form of Final Reading
Paper92.6%
Paper87.9%
Electronic12.1%
Electronic7.5%
Pediatriciansn=644
UNSW
![Page 14: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
56%
20%
15%
9%
Browsing
Online Searching
Cited in Other Pub.
Another Person
Other
Drexel21%
12%
12%
7%
48%
Tennessee
27%
10%
15%
45%
3%
Pittsburgh
MethodMethod ofof ArticleArticle DiscoveryDiscovery
20%
11%48%
11%
10%
UNSW
![Page 15: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Pediatricians
1 year
2-5 years
> 6 years
ScientistsAstronomers
Year of Articles
81.3 %
17 %
2 %
68.8 %
20.8 %
10.4 %
64 %23 %
13 %
55.2%
23.8%
23.8%
UNSW
![Page 16: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Principal Purpose of Reading: Pittsburgh
Research 50%Current Awareness 22%Teaching 18%Writing 10%
![Page 17: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Principal Purpose of Reading: UNSW
Research 55%Teaching 16%Writing Proposals 14%Current Awareness 11%
![Page 18: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
UNSW Value of Reading
• Inspired new thinking 41.7%
• Improved the result 32.2%
• Narrowed the focus 25.2%
![Page 19: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
UNSW Readings Judged To Be…
4%
66%
31%Absolutely essential
Somewhat important
not at all
![Page 20: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Average Number of Personal Subscriptions to Scholarly Journals
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1977 1978-1983
1984 1985-1989
1990-1993
1994-1998
2000-2001
2002-2003
Years of Observation
![Page 21: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Personal Subscriptions
All studies average under 2 U.S. science faculty average 3.6 Medical faculty and pediatricians average 5-
6 UNSW average 2
![Page 22: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Sources of Readings of Scholarly Articles Overtime
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1977 1993-1998 2001-2003
Personal Subs Library Subs Separates
![Page 23: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sources of Readings of Scholarly Articles in Universities
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Personal Subs Library Subs Separates
UT Pitt Drexel UNSW
![Page 24: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
U.S. and Australian academics:
• Read for many reasons, research is #1
• Use many ways to find articles
• Use whatever is most convenient
• Prefer print for personal subscriptions, electronic for library subscriptions
• Patterns vary by subject discipline
![Page 25: Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081603/5681431e550346895daf8109/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
But Australians…
• Rely more on electronic journals
• Read more older articles
• Browse more
• Use alerts more