j.s. mill

21
J.S. Mill Jeremy Bentham

Upload: anana

Post on 08-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Jeremy Bentham. J.S. Mill. Utilitarianism. “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” J.S.MILL. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: J.S. Mill

J.S. Mill

Jeremy Bentham

Page 2: J.S. Mill

Utilitarianism• “The creed which accepts as the

foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” J.S.MILL

Page 3: J.S. Mill

The utilitarian principle:

Act to promote the greatest good (happiness) for the

greatest number.

Page 4: J.S. Mill

• Jeremy Bentham

• 1748-1832• Philosopher of

ethics & political-legal theory

• Democrat, reformer

Bentham’s ActUtilitarianism

Page 5: J.S. Mill

Bentham=s project

• Was to find an objective basis for moral decision making.–He rejected notions of “moral sense,”

“right reason,” “fitness of things” common in his day.–He found pleasure to be the only

objective good, and pain the only evil.

Page 6: J.S. Mill

A Key Assumption:

Psychological Hedonism

• “Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do.”

» Jeremy Bentham

Page 7: J.S. Mill

Bentham’s Hedonistic Calculus:

• Assumes that pleasures & pains are quantifiable

• Assumes pleasures are equal

• Sets up a simple calculation that reveals which actions are the more morally worthy

Page 8: J.S. Mill

We can calculate the merits of any action according to criteria 1. Intensity

2. Duration

3. Certainty or uncertainty

4. Nearness or remoteness

5. Fecundity

6. Purity

7. Multiply 1-6 by number of affected individuals.

Page 9: J.S. Mill

The result:• “Sum the values of all

the pleasures on the one side and those of the pains on the other. The balance, if it be . . . pleasure, will give the good tendency of the act . . . if on the side of pain, the bad tendency.” J. Bentham

Page 10: J.S. Mill

Questioning the assumptions:

“Quantity of pleasures being equal, pushpin is as good as poetry.” J. Bentham

But are pleasures really equal?

• Is happiness really quantifiable?

Page 11: J.S. Mill

Questioning the implications

• Is it too much to ask each individual to calculate each act?

• What is the ideal reach of the theory? What does it require?

• Does its premise (psychological hedonism) undermine its ethical principle?

Page 12: J.S. Mill

Mill’s Rule Utilitarianism• John Stuart Mill• 1806-1873• Used utilitarian

theory to promote 19th C. social reforms

• Tries to correct Bentham’s theory

Page 13: J.S. Mill

From Act to Rule

“There is no time, previous to action, for calculating and weighing the effects of any line of conduct on

general happiness.J. S. Mill

Page 14: J.S. Mill

Rule Utilitarianism

–Based on past experience & knowledge, we can determine what acts in general produce happiness over unhappiness

–apply the Utilitarian principle to general rules, or moral codes as a whole.

• i.e. the Ten Commandments

•Or the Bill of Rights

Page 15: J.S. Mill

Pleasure Correction

• All pleasures are not equal.–“No intelligent being would

consent to be a fool.” j. s. mill

• Distinguishes “base” from “noble” pleasures.

Page 16: J.S. Mill

Advantages of utilitarianism:

It recognizes the social context of morality.

Best applies when large numbers are affected by an action.

Highlights a common sense belief about ethical behavior Actions should promote positive

consequences.

Page 17: J.S. Mill

Critique of utilitarianism

• How can it be consistently applied?–Seems to sanction morally abhorrent

actions

• Promotes a kind of cost-benefit analysis–Ecological ethics, Business Ethics:

Modern slavery, Sale of Organs, consumer protection

Page 18: J.S. Mill

Does Utilitarianism ask too much?

Page 19: J.S. Mill

Issue of knowledge• How far into the future must we

calculate the consequences?

–How accurate can our knowledge of the future ever be?

• An ambiguity: When am I moral?

–When I intend to promote GH?

–When I in fact promote GH?

Page 20: J.S. Mill

Issue of Self-Sacrifice

• Places the collective above the individual

• Asks us to subordinate individual interests for the good of the whole

–Do these facts undermine the core values of individuality? Self reliance? Autonomy? Independence?

Page 21: J.S. Mill

Questions of Happiness

How is happiness to be defined?

A. By the individual?This leads to relativism or

subjectivism.

B. By some objective standard?This implies there is another standard

that grounds utilitarianism.