judges table of contents - az sos · 2014-09-16 · general election ~ november 4, 2014 judges -...

General Election ~ November 4, 2014

Arizona 2014 Judicial Performance Review

JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW

Report of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review43

JUDGES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Who Judges the Judges .................................................................................................... PAGE 44

Statewide Arizona Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal

Judges Summary – Appellate Courts ................................................................................ PAGE 45

Judges Details – Appellate Courts......................................................................................PAGE 46

Trial Courts by County

Judges Summary – Pinal County Superior Court .............................................................. PAGE 48

Judges Details – Pinal County Superior Court .................................................................. PAGE 49

Judges Summary – Pima County Superior Court.............................................................. PAGE 51

Judges Details – Pima County Superior Court .................................................................. PAGE 52

Judges Summary – Maricopa County Superior Court ....................................................... PAGE 55

Judges Details – Maricopa County Superior Court............................................................ PAGE 58

JPR Voter Checklist........................................................................................................... PAGE 76

General Election ~ November 4, 2014


Report of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review

JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW

44

WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES? YOU DO! WE CAN HELP.Voters! Finish the Ballot! Use the following summary and report by the Commission on Judicial Performance Review (JPR) to Finish the Ballot!The JPR Commission was established by voters to evaluate judges’ performance during retention elections. Whilejudges initially are appointed, this report can help you decide whether these judges meet judicial performancestandards and should be retained. Which judges appear on your ballot depends on your county and the court on whichthe judge serves. By using this report to finish your ballot, you will help ensure Arizona’s strong and impartial judiciary!

Some Arizona judges are appointed through Merit Selection and rated by the JPR Commission.Merit Selection and RetentionIn 1974, Arizona voters decided that for Arizona’s Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and Superior Courts in countieswith populations over 250,000 (currently Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal) judges would be appointed by the Governor froma list of qualified candidates. The Arizona Constitution directs commissions to nominate candidates based primarily ontheir merit, with consideration given to the diversity of Arizona’s population. Arizona voters then periodically votewhether to retain these judges as their terms expire. This system is known as Merit Selection and Retention.

JPR Commission Evaluations & Report Created by a constitutional amendment, the 30-member JPR Commission conducts standards-basedperformance evaluations of judges. Most of the JPR Commissioners are public members, not lawyers or judges. JPRreports its results to the public. This report provides JPR Commission findings, survey results, and states whether eachjudge in a retention election “meets” or “fails to meet” judicial performance standards.

Judicial Performance StandardsThe JPR Commission evaluates each judge up for retention election to assess the judge’s:

Legal Ability: Decides cases based on applicable law, demonstrating competent legal analysis. Integrity: Free from personal bias. Administers justice fairly, ethically, and uniformly. Communication Skills: Issues prompt and understandable rulings and directions. Judicial Temperament: Dignified, courteous, and patient. Administrative Performance: Manages courtroom and office effectively. Issues rulings promptly and efficiently.

Public Input Throughout the ProcessThis year, as every election year, the JPR Commission sought public input from citizens who have had directexperience with judges and made its decisions using that input. In 2013, 60,000 surveys on judges were distributed toattorneys, jurors, litigants and witnesses. The JPR Commission held public hearings open to anyone wishing to speakabout the judges up for retention this year. The JPR Commission accepts signed, written comments about merit-appointed judges at any time.

Use JPR Results and ChecklistEvery Voter can take an active role in this judicial review process. Use this JPR summary and report to guide yourvotes for judges up for retention. After reviewing a judge’s information, mark “Yes” or “No” next to the judge’s name onthe Judges Checklist tear-off sheet in this pamphlet. Refer to your checklist to Finish Your Ballot!

Visit www.AZJudges.info for more information.Contact the Commission on Judicial Performance Review: (602) 452-3311

or email [email protected]

JUDGES - SUMMARY - APPELLATE COURTS General Election ~ November 4, 2014

For More Information Visit: www.azjudges.info

JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW



Reading This DataJudicial Performance Commission Results indicate how JPR Commissioners voted, whether a judge “MEETS” Judicial PerformanceStandards based on survey information as well as all other information submitted by the public or the judge. Judicial PerformanceSurveys percentages show results of surveys completed by respondents based on the averaged results of the survey respondentswho rated the judge “satisfactory” or better in combined Judicial Performance Standards categories.

Judicial Performance Standards include: Legal Ability: Decides cases based on applicable law, demonstrating competent legal analysis. Integrity: Free from personal bias. Administers justice fairly, ethically, and uniformly. Communication Skills: Issues prompt and understandable rulings and directions. Judicial Temperament: Dignified, courteous, and patient. Administrative Performance: Manages courtroom and office effectively. Issues rulings promptly and efficiently.

RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE APPELLATE COURT JUSTICES AND JUDGES

The following judges DO NOT MEET Judicial Performance Standards

NONE

The following judges MEET Judicial Performance Standards

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT:Scott BalesRobert Brutinel

COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE:Andrew W. GouldRandall M. HoweDiane M. JohnsenPatricia A. OrozcoSamuel A. Thumma

COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO:Garye L. Vasquez

Judge

JPR Votes “Meets”Judicial

Standards

JPR Votes“Does Not Meet”

Judicial Standards

Did Not Vote

JPR Commission Member

Did Not Vote on Self

Details JPR Page

Bales, Scott 29 0 0 0 46

Brutinel, Robert 29 0 0 0 46

Gould, Andrew 29 0 0 0 46

Howe, Randall 29 0 0 0 46

Johnsen, Diane 29 0 0 0 47

Orozco, Patricia 29 0 0 0 47

Thumma, Samuel 29 0 0 0 47

Vasquez, Garye 27 0 2 0 47

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - DETAILS - APPELLATE COURTS


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW



Reading This DataJudicial Performance Commission Results indicate how JPR Commissioners voted, whether a judge “MEETS” Judicial PerformanceStandards based on survey information as well as all other information submitted by the public or the judge. Judicial PerformanceSurveys percentages show results of surveys completed by respondents based on the averaged results of the survey respondentswho rated the judge “satisfactory” or better in combined Judicial Performance Standards categories. For Judicial PerformanceStandards explanation, see JPR 4.

BALES, SCOTTAppointed toSupreme Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance SurveysAttorney

ResponsesSuperior Court

Judge Responses

Legal AbilityIntegrityCommunication SkillsJudicial TemperamentAdministrative Performance

95%96%98%98%99%

100%100%N/AN/A

100%

BRUTINEL, ROBERTAppointed toSupreme Court: 2011




Judge Responses


90%99%97%99%90%

100%100%N/AN/A

100%

GOULD, ANDREWAppointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2012




Judge Responses


89%99%98%98%94%

99%100%N/AN/A

100%

HOWE, RANDALLAppointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2012




Judge Responses


94%100%100%99%94%

100%100%N/AN/A

100%

JUDGES - DETAILS - APPELLATE COURTS General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW



Reading This DataJudicial Performance Commission Results indicate how JPR Commissioners voted, whether a judge “MEETS” Judicial PerformanceStandards based on survey information as well as all other information submitted by the public or the judge. Judicial PerformanceSurveys percentages show results of surveys completed by respondents based on the averaged results of the survey respondentswho rated the judge “satisfactory” or better in combined Judicial Performance Standards categories. For Judicial PerformanceStandards explanation, see JPR Page 44.

47

JOHNSEN, DIANEAppointed to Court ofAppeals Division 1: 2006




Judge Responses


89%98%98%98%94%

94%90%N/AN/A95%

OROZCO, PATRICIAAppointed to Court ofAppeals Division 1: 2004




Judge Responses


89%98%98%99%91%

97%98%N/AN/A

100%

THUMMA, SAMUELAppointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2012




Judge Responses


84%100%99%100%96%

100%100%N/AN/A

100%

VASQUEZ, GARYEAppointed to Court of Appeals Division II: 2006

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS27 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards 2 Commissioners Did Not Vote



Judge Responses


88%97%97%

100%99%

97%98%N/AN/A98%

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - SUMMARY - PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW





RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES


NONE


Gilberto V. FigueroaSteven J. FullerBrenda E. Oldham

Daniel A. WashburnKevin D. White

JudgeJPR Votes

“Meets”Judicial Standards


Judicial Standards

Did Not Vote



Details JPR Page

Figueroa, Gilberto 29 0 0 0 49

Fuller, Steven 29 0 0 0 49

Oldham, Brenda 29 0 0 0 49

Washburn, Daniel 27 1 1 0 49

White, Kevin 28 1 0 0 50

JUDGES - DETAILS - PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




49

FIGUEROA, GILBERTOElected to Pinal County Superior Court: 1998



ResponsesLitigant/Witness

Responses


94%97%97%95%98%

N/A100%100%100%100%

FULLER, STEVENElected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


100%99%

100%93%

100%

N/A84%74%71%83%

OLDHAM, BRENDAElected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


93%96%95%93%93%

N/A100%94%95%93%

WASHBURN, DANIELElected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2011

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS27 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 1 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards 1 Commissioner Did Not Vote



Responses


86%97%78%84%94%

N/A95%95%91%97%

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - DETAILS - PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




WHITE, KEVINElected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2005




Responses


83%87%76%75%69%

N/A100%100%100%100%

JUDGES - SUMMARY - PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW





RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES


Catherine M. Woods


Jeffrey T. BerginChristopher BrowningJavier Chon-LopezCharles HarringtonDanelle B. Liwski

James E. MarnerRichard D. NicholsKathleen A. QuigleyKenneth C. Stanford

Judge

JPR Votes “Meets”Judicial

Standards


Judicial Standards

Did Not Vote



Details JPR Page

Bergin, Jeffrey 29 0 0 0 52

Browning, Christopher 29 0 0 0 52

Chon-Lopez, Javier 29 0 0 0 52

Harrington, Charles 29 0 0 0 52

Liwski, Danelle 29 0 0 0 53

Marner, James 29 0 0 0 53

Nichols, Richard 29 0 0 0 53

Quigley, Kathleen 29 0 0 0 53

Stanford, Kenneth 29 0 0 0 54

Woods, Catherine 7 22 0 0 54

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - DETAILS - PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




BERGIN, JEFFREYAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


98%99%100%100%100%

N/A100%100%100%100%

BROWNING, CHRISTOPHERAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1998




Responses


94%93%96%90%99%

N/A98%97%98%98%

CHON-LOPEZ, JAVIERAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


87%100%91%96%82%

N/A99%

100%100%100%

HARRINGTON, CHARLESAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1999




Responses


98%99%98%97%99%

N/A96%97%94%

100%

JUDGES - DETAILS - PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




53

LIWSKI, DANELLEAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


94%90%90%94%97%

N/A86%82%82%97%

MARNER, JAMESAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


100%99%99%98%100%

N/A100%100%100%100%

NICHOLS, RICHARDAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1995




Responses


94%98%96%97%99%

N/A97%96%98%98%

QUIGLEY, KATHLEENAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


100%99%100%99%100%

N/A100%100%100%100%

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - DETAILS - PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




STANFORD, KENNETHAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


88%93%93%93%99%

N/A100%100%100%95%

WOODS, CATHERINEAppointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2011

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 7 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards22 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards



Responses


80%88%76%83%82%

N/A100%100%100%100%

JUDGES - SUMMARY - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW





RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THEMARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES


Benjamin R. Norris


MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT:

Mark F. AcetoAimee L. AndersonArthur T. AndersonBradley AstrowskyCynthia J. BaileyJanet E. BartonEdward W. BassettDawn M. BerginJames T. BlomoMark H. BrainRoger E. BrodmanWilliam L. BrothertonKatherine M. CooperJanice K. CrawfordDavid O. CunananNorman J. DavisSally S. DuncanBoyd W. DunnAlfred M. FenzelDean M. FinkGeorge H. Foster, Jr.J. Richard GamaWarren J. GranvilleHugh E. HegyiMichael J. Herrod

Bethany G. HicksCarey S. HyattBrian K. IshikawaJoseph C. KreamerDaniel G. MartinRosa P. MrozSamuel J. MyersKaren L. O’ConnorSusanna C. PinedaJay PolkGerald J. PorterJohn C. ReaPeter C. ReinsteinEmmet J. RonanJoan M. SinclairPamela Hearn SvobodaDavid M. TalamanteDanielle J. ViolaRandall H. WarnerJoseph C. WeltyEileen S. Willett

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - SUMMARY - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW



JudgeJPR Votes

“Meets” Judicial Standards


Judicial Standards

Did Not Vote



Details JPR Page

Aceto, Mark 29 0 0 0 58

Anderson, Aimee 29 0 0 0 58

Anderson, Arthur 29 0 0 0 58

Astrowsky, Bradley 25 4 0 0 58

Bailey, Cynthia 29 0 0 0 59

Barton, Janet 29 0 0 0 59

Bassett, Edward 29 0 0 0 59

Bergin, Dawn 29 0 0 0 59

Blomo, James 29 0 0 0 60

Brain, Mark 29 0 0 0 60

Brodman, Roger 29 0 0 0 60

Brotherton, William 28 1 0 0 60

Cooper, Katherine 29 0 0 0 61

Crawford, Janice 29 0 0 0 61

Cunanan, David 29 0 0 0 61

Davis, Norman 29 0 0 0 61

Duncan, Sally 29 0 0 0 62

Dunn, Boyd 29 0 0 0 62

Fenzel, Alfred 29 0 0 0 62

Fink, Dean 29 0 0 0 62

Foster, George 28 0 0 1 63

Gama, J. Richard 29 0 0 0 63

Granville, Warren 29 0 0 0 63

Hegyi, Hugh 29 0 0 0 63

Herrod, Michael 29 0 0 0 64

Hicks, Bethany 29 0 0 0 64

Hyatt, Carey 29 0 0 0 64

Ishikawa, Brian 29 0 0 0 64

Kreamer, Joseph 29 0 0 0 65

Martin, Daniel 29 0 0 0 65

Mroz, Rosa 29 0 0 0 65

Myers, Samuel 29 0 0 0 65

Norris, Benjamin 3 25 1 0 66

O’Connor, Karen 29 0 0 0 66

Pineda, Susanna 29 0 0 0 66

Polk, Jay 29 0 0 0 66

Porter, Gerald 18 11 0 0 67

Rea, John 29 0 0 0 67

Reinstein, Peter 28 1 0 0 67

JUDGES - SUMMARY - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW



JudgeJPR Votes

“Meets” Judicial Standards


Judicial Standards

Did Not Vote



Details JPR Page

Ronan, Emmet 29 0 0 0 67

Sinclair, Joan 29 0 0 0 68

Svoboda, Pamela 29 0 0 0 68

Talamante, David 29 0 0 0 68

Viola, Danielle 29 0 0 0 68

Warner, Randall 29 0 0 0 69

Welty, Joseph 29 0 0 0 69

Willett, Eileen 29 0 0 0 69

General Election ~ November 4, 2014 JUDGES - DETAILS - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT


JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




ACETO, MARKAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995




Responses


96%99%98%97%99%

N/A97%92%95%98%

ANDERSON, AIMEEAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


100%100%97%92%93%

N/A84%75%80%76%

ANDERSON, ARTHURAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999




Responses


90%96%91%90%88%

N/A100%100%100%100%

ASTROWSKY, BRADLEYAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


92%92%91%77%83%

N/A100%100%100%100%

JUDGES - DETAILS - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT General Election ~ November 4, 2014


JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




59

BAILEY, CYNTHIAAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


96%96%96%93%98%

N/A100%100%100%100%

BARTON, JANETAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000




Responses


100%100%100%93%100%

N/A0%0%0%0%

BASSETT, EDWARDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2008




Responses


95%100%100%96%100%

N/A94%87%94%97%

BERGIN, DAWNAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


90%99%93%94%95%

N/A100%100%100%100%



JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




BLOMO, JAMESAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


94%96%90%76%89%

N/A100%98%99%99%

BRAIN, MARKAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


92%99%96%96%99%

N/A100%100%100%100%

BRODMAN, ROGERAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


95%98%96%96%99%

N/A92%94%87%89%

BROTHERTON, WILLIAMAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


88%90%89%74%95%

N/A95%97%99%98%



JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




61

COOPER, CATHERINEAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


93%99%92%98%98%

N/A98%83%88%92%

CRAWFORD, JANICEAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


98%99%97%98%99%

N/A88%86%80%82%

CUNANAN, DAVIDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


92%96%88%92%96%

N/A97%75%75%79%

DAVIS, NORMANAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995


Judicial Performance Surveys All Respondents

Judge Davis is the Maricopa County PresidingJudge and was reviewed on administrativeduties.


N/A97%98%98%98%



JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




DUNCAN, SALLYAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004




Responses


92%95%90%93%94%

N/A95%67%90%76%

DUNN, BOYDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


90%90%84%84%84%

N/A90%91%89%88%

FENZEL, ALFREDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999




Responses


94%98%95%95%97%

N/A100%100%100%100%

FINK, DEANAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


93%98%95%99%99%

N/A100%100%100%100%



JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




63

FOSTER, JR., GEORGEAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS28 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards 1 JPR Commission Member-Did Not Vote on Self



Responses


89%94%86%86%91%

N/A79%68%74%73%

GAMA, J. RICHARDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000




Responses


96%99%99%98%95%

N/A100%100%100%100%

GRANVILLE, WARRENAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000




Responses


99%99%100%99%100%

N/A100%100%100%97%

HEGYI, HUGHAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


77%97%86%86%90%

N/A94%78%82%78%



JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




HERROD, MICHAELAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


95%98%96%99%97%

N/A100%100%100%100%

HICKS, BETHANYAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999




Responses


94%95%94%95%98%

N/A90%88%91%93%

HYATT, CAREYAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000




Responses


96%98%94%92%98%

N/A98%100%100%100%

ISHIKAWA, BRIANAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995




Responses


95%99%95%98%97%

N/A100%99%99%100%



JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




65

KREAMER, JOSEPHAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


96%100%100%99%99%

N/A100%100%100%100%

MARTIN, DANIELAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


90%90%91%91%94%

N/A100%100%100%100%

MROZ, ROSAAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004




Responses


100%100%99%97%

100%

N/A100%100%100%100%

MYERS, SAMUELAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


97%100%96%

100%99%

N/A99%96%96%100%



JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




NORRIS, BENJAMINAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2008

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 3 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards25 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards 1 Commissioner Did Not Vote



Responses


75%87%67%59%84%

N/A93%86%89%90%

O’CONNOR, KARENAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000




Responses


92%91%94%94%98%

N/A100%100%100%100%

PINEDA, SUSANNAAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


86%99%98%96%90%

N/A100%100%100%100%

POLK, JAYAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011



Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses


95%98%94%94%96%

N/A88%80%73%67%



JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




67

PORTER, GERALDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS18 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards11 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards



Responses


93%96%88%90%95%

N/A77%66%66%70%

REA, JOHNAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004




Responses


97%100%98%99%99%

N/A100%100%100%100%

REINSTEIN, PETERAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1998




Responses


94%92%89%80%94%

N/A98%86%89%88%

RONAN, EMMETAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000




Responses


96%98%96%97%96%

N/A99%96%99%97%



JUD

ICIA

L PE

RFO

RM

ANCE

REV

IEW




SINCLAIR, JOANAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


94%99%98%99%84%

N/A100%98%98%99%

SVOBODA, PAMELAAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012




Responses


100%100%100%100%100%

N/A92%92%92%100%

TALAMANTE, DAVIDAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999




Responses


98%96%94%96%98%

N/A92%86%89%91%

VIOLA, DANIELLEAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011




Responses


98%98%98%98%98%

N/A83%75%83%86%



JUD

ICIAL PERFO

RM

ANCE R

EVIEW




69

WARNER, RANDALLAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


98%99%99%99%100%

N/A100%100%100%100%

WELTY, JOSEPHAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007




Responses


100%100%100%99%100%

N/A100%100%100%100%

WILLETT, EILEENAppointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999




Responses


97%100%98%99%100%

N/A92%91%94%94%

judges table of contents - az sos · 2014-09-16 · general election ~ november 4, 2014 judges -...

Documents