judging 101

64
Judging 101 A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone

Upload: lucius

Post on 24-Feb-2016

62 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Judging 101. A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone. Why Judge?. Without judges, there are no tournaments! Each school is required to provide judges in order for their students to compete. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Judging 101

Judging 101A Speech and Debate survival

guide for everyone

Page 2: Judging 101

Why Judge? Without judges, there are no

tournaments! Each school is required to provide

judges in order for their students to compete.

The number of judges each school is required to bring is directly related to the number of students and the events in which they are entered.

Page 3: Judging 101

As a judge, what should I bring to a tournament?

Your favorite pen If you are judging debate events, it is helpful to

have 2 different colors of ink. Paper or legal pads

It is especially helpful for judges of debate events.

A digital timer A watch with a second-hand is NOT

acceptable. Reading material or business work

Most judges usually have at least 1 round off. A copy of the judge manual

This can come in handy for questions during rounds.

Page 4: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO:

Attend all judge calls to receive judging assignments.

Report to the assigned room on-time.

Ask students to turn off all electronic devices. Make sure you have turned yours off as well!

Page 5: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO:

Take careful notes of each speech.

Keep time on all presentations and provide time signals to the contestants if you have a digital timer.

Complete the ballot(s) with as many substantive comments as possible.

Page 6: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO:

Use a pen and press down hard on debate ballots with multiple copies.

Provide a clear reason for each of your ranking/win-loss decisions.

Complete the master ballot for speech events properly.

Turn in your ballot(s) promptly after the round’s conclusion.

Page 7: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO NOT:

Judge any round in which a student from the school you represent is competing (except Student Congress).

Switch ballots with other judges or take other judges’ assignments.

Allow anyone to video tape, audio tape, or photograph any round.

Page 8: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO NOT:

Allow students to keep time for you.

Ask students for a copy of their scripts or orations.

Ask students what school they are from.

Discuss the students you judged, or your ranking/decision, with other judges.

Page 9: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO NOT:

Penalize speakers for their attire. You can, however, penalize a student for attire that is distracting to his/her performance.

Allow interruptions once a speaker or performance begins.

Page 10: Judging 101

Guidelines For All Judges DO NOT:

Confer with other judges. Each judge should make his/her decision independently.

Observe student performances when you have a round off, as you may be asked to judge those students in a future round.

Page 11: Judging 101

Disclosure/Critiques

It is NOT permissible to talk to students after a round about how you voted/ranked their performances.

Please keep all ranking decisions to yourself.

If you have a comment or question about a performance, please direct it to your school’s coach or a tournament official.

Page 12: Judging 101

Event Distinctions Debate

Lincoln Douglas, Team/Policy Debate, and Public Forum You are determining a win and a loss in the round.

Individual Events Original Oratory, Declamation,

Extemporaneous Speaking, Oral Interpretation, Duo Interpretation, Dramatic Performance IE competitors are ranked from 1 to 6 in the room.

Student Congress Each student to give a speech receives

points from 6 to 1 (zero if less than 60 seconds)

Then students are put in order from 1-6 for best legislator Unlike IE, 6 is the highest value on the individual

speaker sheet.

Page 13: Judging 101

Lincoln Douglas Debate Lincoln-Douglas debate is a two-person

format where the affirmative supports the resolution and the negative attacks it.

The resolution, which changes every two months, is always a question of value.

The debaters will try to show why their position supports the more important, fundamental principles inherent in their position and why that position is superior to the opponent’s.

Page 14: Judging 101

Lincoln Douglas Debate The debaters will construct their cases

using logic, theory, and philosophy. Arguments are to be substantiated by

analysis, testimony, comparison and contrast, analogy, example, and/or factual data.

The most important requirement for a debater’s delivery is that you are able to understand them and write down their arguments.

If the arguments do not make sense to you, be sure to comment on that problem on the ballot.

Page 15: Judging 101

Lincoln Douglas Debate A balance between relevant

content and persuasive delivery is optimal.

Judges ought to put aside their own attitudes and preferences where the issues in the round are concerned.

The judge’s purpose is to decide who has done the better job of debating, and not to decide which side is the “correct” one.

Page 16: Judging 101

Lincoln Douglas Debate Judges should write comments to the

debaters on the ballot. Debaters want to know what didn’t

work, what the judge didn’t buy as an argument or strategy, and how they can improve.

Comments on delivery problems that affected the judge’s ability to comprehend the arguments are always helpful.

Judges should always give a Reason For Decision outlining arguments which you felt were the important ones in the round and who you think won them.

Page 17: Judging 101
Page 18: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate Public Forum values persuasion as

much as it values argumentation and reasoning.

The topic is a current event and changes monthly.

The pro team must uphold the resolution, and the con team must negate the resolution.

Page 19: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate Judges should look for clear, well-

structured cases that use logical arguments and evidence as support.

Judges should expect to see clash, meaning the debaters refute their opponents’ arguments, showing why they are flawed or insufficient.

Page 20: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate Delivery is an important part of

this event. Debaters should be fluent,

articulate, free of slang and jargon, have good vocal variety and good eye contact with the judge.

Argumentation should be organized and vigorous but civil. Teams should not be obnoxious, rude

or loud.

Page 21: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate You must decide which team was

most persuasive in the debate. Judges should do their best to be

objective about the issues, setting aside their own opinions and attitudes.

The judge’s job is to determine which team did the better job of debating, not which side is right and which side is wrong.

Page 22: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate The ballots should explain your

reason for decision, which should include which arguments were most persuasive.

Suggestions for improvement in delivery are also helpful.

Page 23: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate For PBCFL tournaments, the sides are set

prior to the students entering the rounds. In National Competition (NFL) ONLY, a

coin toss will determine the organization of the round. Generally one team will flip and the other

will call. The coin toss must be witnessed by the

judge(s) assigned to the round.

Page 24: Judging 101

Public Forum Debate The team that wins the coin toss

shall select EITHER: 1. Which side of the topic they wish to

uphold (Pro or Con) OR

2. Which speech they would like to give (First or Last)

The team which lost the coin toss will select from the remaining option.

Page 25: Judging 101
Page 26: Judging 101

Student Congress Contestants in Student Congress

become legislators charged with the task of fulfilling the responsibilities of the legislative branch of the federal government.

Prior to the tournament students receive the topics and research those areas to prepare speeches.

Page 27: Judging 101

Student Congress Each Congress session is

approximately 2 1/2 hours. The session is run by a student

Presiding Officer. The PO’s job includes:

Recognizing speakers Conducting vote Keeping order

Page 28: Judging 101

Student Congress At all tournaments, you will be

given lots of copies of a Speaker Ballot.

All speeches are a maximum of 3 minutes in length. Each speech has a required cross-examination period, where other student legislators question the speaker.

Each time a student is recognized for the purpose of making a speech, you should complete a ballot.

Page 29: Judging 101

Student Congress Fill out all identification information

on the ballot. Write comments telling the

speaker what you thought of delivery and content.

Assign a score on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 6 (excellent).

Page 30: Judging 101

Student Congress Unlike other speech events, you

will give the same number to several different speakers.

It is always a good idea to save the score of 6 for truly outstanding speeches.

Likewise, scores of 3 or below should be reserved for short, poorly delivered, or inappropriate commentary. If a speech is less than one minute, it

gets a score of 0.

Page 31: Judging 101
Page 32: Judging 101

Student Congress When you receive your judge packet,

you will also receive a Master Ballot, a blank grid on which to record scores.

Write the last name of the legislators on the left side. Indicate who is the PO in the round

Circle the score (6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0) you entered on the speaker’s individual ballot for that speech.

When the session is done, add up the total points and enter that in the right side column.

Page 33: Judging 101
Page 34: Judging 101

Student Congress You may also be asked to judge the

Presiding Officer. This person is referred to as the

Parliamentarian At most tournaments, the Presiding

Officer’s score will be based on a maximum of 12 points.

In these cases, total scores below 8 should be reserved for extreme circumstances.

Page 35: Judging 101
Page 36: Judging 101

Student Congress Your other major responsibility

during the session is to note how well each legislator performs with respect to: Participation in questioning periods Level of involvement in parliamentary

disputes Interaction with other legislators Decorum Behavior Attendance

Page 37: Judging 101

Student Congress You will be asked to select a

designated number of students as the Best Legislators in the session.

Look for students who were excellent speakers and excellent legislators (may include PO).

A tournament official will tell you how many legislators to select.

Page 38: Judging 101
Page 39: Judging 101

Extemporaneous Speaking Students are given 30 minutes of

preparation time to deliver a 7 minute speech that answers a question about a topic of public interest, almost always pertaining to current events.

Only the judge and one contestant at a time will be present in the room. The first speaker will arrive when his/her 30

minutes have elapsed. Each subsequent speaker will come into the

room at approximately 7 minute intervals.

Page 40: Judging 101

Extemporaneous Speaking Each speaker should hand the

question to the judge when he/she enters the room.

Speaker should be judged on: Content organization Valid and varied evidence Effective delivery

Page 41: Judging 101
Page 42: Judging 101
Page 43: Judging 101

Original Oratory Oratory is a speech of up to 10

minutes that must be: composed by the student delivering it memorized

The purpose of the oration should be to inform and/or persuade.

The topic should be interesting, stimulating, and of some importance.

Page 44: Judging 101

Original Oratory Speakers must not be penalized for

expressing views with which the judge happens to disagree.

The Speech should be organized for easy understanding.

Content should be developed with varied support and effective language.

Vocal and physical delivery should enhance the content.

Page 45: Judging 101
Page 46: Judging 101
Page 47: Judging 101

Declamation In Declamation, students present a

memorized speech that must have been actually delivered in real life.

Selections may include, but are not limited to: professional speeches public orations Eulogies sermons, etc.

Page 48: Judging 101

Declamation The introduction must:

name the work and author provide necessary background information establish the mood

Judging should be based on effectiveness of: Presentation style Vocal delivery Physical delivery Ability to interpret and convey

speech’s original message

Page 49: Judging 101
Page 50: Judging 101
Page 51: Judging 101

Oral Interpretation An interpreter delivers either 10

minutes of prose or poetry selections while holding a script.

Students must prepare separate prose and poetry selections, which they will perform in alternating rounds.

In any given round, a judge will hear either all poetry or all prose.

Each piece must include an introduction stating author(s) and title(s).

Page 52: Judging 101

Oral Interpretation The selection should be literature,

either as: A single piece A cutting A series of short pieces united by

theme or author A balance between eye contact

and reading is required. Feet must remain firmly planted in

one place.

Page 53: Judging 101
Page 54: Judging 101
Page 55: Judging 101

Duo Interpretation Challenges two students to

produce a 10 minute believable scene without the use of costuming or props.

The material may be humorous or dramatic or may combine both tones.

The selection must be memorized; no scripts are to be used.

Page 56: Judging 101

Duo Interpretation An introduction must be provided

that names the work and author. The only time students may look at

one another or touch one another is during the introduction.

Movement is limited. Performers should convince you

that they are the characters and that their scene’s surroundings are real.

Page 57: Judging 101
Page 58: Judging 101
Page 59: Judging 101

Dramatic Performance Student performs a memorized, 10

minute cutting, dramatic, humorous, or both, from a published piece of literature for the purpose of creating a compelling scene

The student may portray one or more characters

The student may not use props or costumes

Page 60: Judging 101

Dramatic Performance The story should be complete and easy

to follow Vocal and physical delivery should

enhance development of the character/scene

Student must provide an introduction in which he/she states the title and author of the selection

Students should use “focal points,” except during the introduction and when portraying characters who address the audience directly

Page 61: Judging 101
Page 62: Judging 101
Page 63: Judging 101

Judging Grid

Code 216 1 2 2 2 2 2 222 - 1 1 1 1 1 247 - - 3 4 4 4 201 - - - 3 3 3 213 - - - - 5 6 200 - - - - - 5

Page 64: Judging 101

Thank YouWe appreciate EVERYTHING you do for our teams!

Remember, without you, none of this would be possible!