judicial system

28
Judicial System Courtroom Procedures

Upload: burian

Post on 23-Feb-2016

67 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Judicial System . Courtroom Procedures. Judicial System. What is it? is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. The judicial System also provides a mechanism for the resolution disputes. . Judicial System. How is it set up? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Judicial System

Judicial System Courtroom Procedures

Page 2: Judicial System

What is it?◦ is the system of courts that interprets and applies

the law in the name of the state. The judicial System also provides a

mechanism for the resolution disputes.

Judicial System

Page 3: Judicial System

How is it set up?◦ Under the doctrine of the separation of powers ( 3

Branches of Government.) Legislature, Judical, Executive branches

the judiciary generally does not make law (the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce law (which is the responsibility of the executive), but rather interprets law and applies it to the facts of each case.

This branch of government is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under law.

Judicial System

Page 4: Judicial System

3 sets of Judicial Court System◦ County◦ State◦ Federal

Judicial System

Page 5: Judicial System

There are 4 types of Court Cases1. Civil

A civil case is a disagreement between two or more people or businesses. Examples

disputes between a landlord and tenant divorce actions a case where one person is suing another for damages. Small claims court

Courts

Page 6: Judicial System

2. Criminal◦ A criminal case involves a person who has been

accused of committing either a misdemeanor or a felony offense. Examples

Homicide Robbery Drug trafficking

Courts

Page 7: Judicial System

3. Juvenile◦ a juvenile case usually involves a minor who is

under the age of seventeen.◦ Juvenile cases are heard by the family division of

the circuit court.

Court

Page 8: Judicial System

4. Traffic◦ the most common type of court case is related to

a traffic violation.◦ A traffic violation may be either a civil infraction

or a misdemeanor.

Court

Page 9: Judicial System

Defendant - Person who is sued in a civil case or accused in a criminal case.

Prosecutor - A public officer who conducts criminal proceedings on behalf of the state.

Judge - A public officer of the court, who listens and mediates and sometimes carries out decisions pretaining to a court case.

Jury - A group of citizens that decides the outcome of a civil case, or decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty in a criminal case. In a felony case, the jury will consist of 12 persons. In a misdemeanor or civil case, the jury consists of 6 persons. In a criminal case, the jury must reach a unanimous verdict.

Bailiff - The individual in the courtroom who helps the judge manage the evidence and maintain order in the courtroom.

Courtroom Terms

Page 10: Judicial System

Beyond a reasonable doubt -A standard of proof required to convict a person of a crime. The jury has a high degree of certainty about the defendant’s guilt, although they need not be 100 percent convinced.

Burden of proof- A party’s duty to prove a disputed fact.

Indictment -A written accusation charging that a person has committed a crime.

Felony - The most serious category of criminal offenses. With penalties of imprisonment ranging from a year and a day to life, or in some states, punishable by death. In Minnesota, a felony is a crime punishable by imprisonment of more than one year, with or without a fine.

Courtroom Terms

Page 11: Judicial System

Grand jury - In Minnesota, a panel of twenty-three citizens who hear evidence against a person accused of a crime and determine whether that person should stand trial. A grand jury can also investigate various aspects of government at its own initiative, particularly charges of corruption or mismanagement.

Charge -The process of accusing the defendant of a crime.

Indictment -A written accusation charging that a person has committed a crime.

Courtroom Terms

Page 12: Judicial System

Perjure -To knowingly and willfully give false testimony under oath. Warrant - Sanction or authorization, as an arrest warrant

authorizes a police officer to take an individual into custody.  Probable cause - A strong belief, based on facts, that a

crime has been committed, that a particular person has committed the crime and that evidence related to the crime exists.

Acquittal - The finding of not guilty. Appeal - The act of seeking a higher court’s review of a lower

court’s decision.

Courtroom Terms

Page 13: Judicial System

Courtroom Procedures Participants:

◦ Judge◦ Prosecution attorneys◦ Defense attorneys◦ Jury◦ Representative of the media (sketch artist,

reporters)◦ Baliff◦ Witnesses for presecution/petitioner◦ Witnesses for defense

Page 14: Judicial System

Courtroom Procedures Opening Statement The Oath Direct Examination Cross Examination Closing Argument Jury Deliberation Findings/Ruling/Judgement

Page 15: Judicial System

Opening Statements - Prosecution

The opening statement to the judge and jury to inform them of the nature and facts of the case.◦ This statement should include the following information in

order to clearly come across to the jury. ◦ Include

Name of the case Your name Client’s name Opponent’s name A description or story of the facts and circumstances that led to

the case. A summary of the key facts each witness will bring out in

tesitmony and the importance of any documents to be introduced. Conclusions and request for relief. ( Find innocent or guilty)

Page 16: Judicial System

Opening Statement: Prosecution

Avoid Too much detail. It may tire and confuse the jury. Exaggeration and overstatement. Don’t use such

phrases as “prove it to a mathematical certainty” or “prove it absolutely beyond question.” Argument. It violates the function of the opening

statement (which is to provide the facts of the case from your client’s viewpoint), and you risk

rebuke from the bench. Anticipating what the defense attorney will say. Walking or pacing. It distracts juries and irritates

judges.

Page 17: Judicial System

Opening Statements: Defense

To deny that the prosecution or plaintiff has a valid case and to outline the facts from the standpoint of the defendant. ◦ This statement should include the following information in

order to clearly come across to the jury. Include

Your name and your client’s name. General theory of defense. Facts that tend to weaken the plaintiff’s case. A rundown of what each defense witness will testify to. Conclusion.

Page 18: Judicial System

Opening Statement: Defense

Avoid Repetition of facts that are not in dispute. Exaggeration and argument. Strong points of the plaintiff’s case. Walking or pacing. It distracts juries and irritates judges.

Page 19: Judicial System

Activity

Page 20: Judicial System

Direct Examination of Witness

1. Purpose◦ To present the evidence necessary to warrant a

verdict favorable to your client. ◦ All theelements of a law or criminal charge must

be brought into evidence by witness testimony or documents.

◦ To present the facts with clarity and understanding; to convince the jury of the soundness of your client’s case.

◦ To present your witnesses to the greatest advantage; to establish their credibility.

Page 21: Judicial System

Direct Examination of Witness

2. Refreshing memoryIn the event that your witness’s memory fails, you may refresh his or her memory by the use of the witness statement.

3. General suggestions Ask “open-ended” questions. Those usually begin with who,

what, when, where, or how, or by asking the witness to “explain” or “describe.”

Avoid complex or long-winded questions—questions should be clear and simple.

Be a “friendly guide” for the witnesses as they tell their stories. Let the witnesses be the stars.

Be prepared to gather information via questions and answers. Narratives, though very effective, may be open to objections.

Page 22: Judicial System

Activity

Page 23: Judicial System

Cross – Examination of Witnesses

1. Purpose◦ To secure admissions from opposing witnesses

that will tend to prove your case.◦ To discredit your opponent’s witness and their

statement. 2. Scope

◦ Witnesses may be cross-examined regarding their direct testimony.

◦ Cross-examination is used to explain, modify, or discredit what a witness has previously stated.

Page 24: Judicial System

Cross-Examination of Witnesses3. Approach

◦ Use narrow, leading questions that suggest an answer to the witness. Ask questions that require “yes” or “no” answers.

◦ Expose lack of sincerity or the existence of bias.◦ Never ask “Why?” It gives a well-prepared witness a

chance to explain.◦ Generally, don’t ask questions unless you know what

kind of answer you are going to obtain.◦ Fishing trips may be expensive.◦ Be fair, courteous; avoid the “Isn’t it a fact…?” type of

questioning.◦ It may be useful not to insist on an answer.

Page 25: Judicial System

Activity

Page 26: Judicial System

Closing Argument Summarize the highlights of the testimony

and documents as they support your case and undermine your opponent’s case. Use actual examples from the trial that you have written down.

Tie the facts to the law. Be persuasive. Confidently request the judge or jury to

grant you the decision that you want.

Page 27: Judicial System

Activity

Page 28: Judicial System

Jury Deliberation Once all arguments have been given and

witnesses have been questioned. The jury’s job fully begins.

They are to go back to their deliberation room and begin discussing the evidence and statements brought to them in the case.

They then decide if the accused is innocent or guilty, on all charges brought against the accused.