judith jarvis thomson, "the trolley problem" (1985)

23
J.J. Thomson, “The Trolley Problem” (1985) PHIL 102, UBC Christina Hendricks Fall 2015 Except images licensed otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC BY 4.0

Upload: christina-hendricks

Post on 22-Jan-2017

2.670 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

J.J. Thomson, “The Trolley Problem” (1985)

PHIL 102, UBCChristina Hendricks

Fall 2015

Except images licensed otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC BY 4.0

Page 3: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Trolley Driver 5 1

Page 4: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Philippa Foot, 1967 Transpl

ant

Page 5: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Trolley driver & transplant

• How does Philippa Foot (1967) explain the difference between these cases?

• What do you think?

Page 6: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Thomson’s response to Foot

• Foot’s solution won’t work for a different case from “trolley driver”: “bystander at the switch”

oWhy not?

Page 7: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Bystander at the Switch

Basic Trolley Scenario, Flickr photo shared by John Holbo, licensed CC BY-NC 2.0

Permissible to flip the switch?

Page 8: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Foot’s Driver vs Transplant

I. “Killing one is worse than letting five die” (Thomson 1396)

II. “Killing five is worse than killing one” (Thomson 1397) Trolley, Flickr photo shared by

John Holbo, licensed CC BY-NC 2.0

Bystander at the switch is in this situation too

Page 9: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Thomson’s main question“Why is it that the bystander may turn

his trolley, though the surgeon may not remove the young man’s lungs, kidneys and heart?” (1401)

Basic Trolley Scenario, Flickr photo shared by John Holbo, licensed CC BY-NC 2.0

Page 10: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

How does Thomson answer this question?

Page 11: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Using people as means to ends?

Is the difference between transplant and bystander that:

• in transplant the surgeon uses the patient merely as a means to save the five others,

• but that doesn’t happen in the bystander at the switch case?

Page 12: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

No, b/c of loop example (1402-1403)

Using a person merely as a means to an end

Bystander

Page 13: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

What do you think of “loop”?

Straw polls on LC:(attendance not taken; this is just for interest’s sake)

• How many think it is morally permissible for the bystander at the switch w/o the loop to pull the switch?

• How many think it is morally permissible for the bystander at the switch with the loop to pull the switch?

Page 14: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Can we appeal to rights?• “rights trump utilities” (1404)

• Can we say, then, that (1404):i. Surgeon cannot transplant b/c violates

rights of patient, butii. Bystander can flip switch b/c doing so

doesn’t violate rights of the one who is killed?

This may not be true (1405)May still flip switch even if violate rights (1405-1406)

Then why can’t surgeon transplant?

Page 15: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Another way to distinguish bystander from transplant

• Bystander: saves 5 by making something that threatens them, threaten 1 instead (1407)

• Not true of transplant

• Imagine a case similar to bystander: o deflecting lethal gas in

hospital from five to one (1407-1408)

Page 16: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

“Distributive Exemption”• “permits arranging that something that will

do harm anyway shall be better distributed than it otherwise will be—shall … do harm to fewer rather than more” (1408).

• Could use this to say:oBystander may turn the trolleyoWe may deflect gas fumes in the hospitalo The surgeon must not transplant

Page 17: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

“Distributive Exemption”Difference between this and what Foot says about choosing between violating two negative duties?

Driver’s choice Bystander’s choice

Killing 1

Violating negative duty and 1 dies

Killing 5

Violating negative duty and 5 die

Killing 1

Violating negative duty and 1 dies

Letting 5 die

Not fulfilling positive duty

On Foot’s principle, this may not be permissible

Page 18: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

But…

Distributive exemption is only morally permissible if we can deflect a harm from many onto fewer “by means which do not themselves constitute infringements on the rights of the one” (1409)

Page 19: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

How does Thomson argue that it’s permissible for the bystander to

flip the switch but not to push the large person?

Page 20: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

“Fat Man”

Bridge Situation, Flickr photo shared by John Holbo, licensed CC BY-NC 2.0

Basic Trolley Scenario, Flickr photo shared by John Holbo, licensed CC BY-NC 2.0

Page 21: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

What do you think of “fat man”?

Straw poll on LC:(attendance not taken; this is just for interest’s sake)

• How many think it is morally permissible for the bystander to push the large person off the bridge to stop the trolley?

Page 22: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Summary & review

Why?

Page 23: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem" (1985)

Why these weird scenarios?

• What could be the point of unrealistic thought experiments like this?

• Create artificial situations to focus in on particular questionsoWhat questions are focused on in trolley

driver vs. transplant, bystander at the switch, fat man, loop?