judith williamson, decoding advertisements - teaching media

2
27/07/13 Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements - TEACHING MEDIA www.teachingmedia.org/williamson-judith-decoding-advertisements/ 1/2 WHERE MEDIA SCHOLARS SHARE RESOURCES & IDEAS FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE CLASSROOM Search TEACHING MEDIA Assignments, Presentations, Readings for Undergraduates Add comments Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements I’ve found Judith Williamson’s Decoding Advertisements incredibly useful for introducing students to semiotics, ideology and subjectivity, as well as the critical study of advertising. I usually use Chapters One and Two. Students find the reading to be challenging, but I help them out a bit with this handout, which is my breakdown of her key points about advertising, subjects, and ideology. How Advertising/Ideology Works/Means through Subjects: Four processes discussed by Judith Williamson We create the meaning of the ad/ Currency of Signs: Our unconscious linking of products, images, and emotions produces the meaning of the ad. The currency of signs does not exist without our active and desiring minds that complete transactions, transfer meanings and values between signs. The ad draws on existing referent systems— shared cultural codes, sign systems, and conceptual maps—to construct its meaning, and we in turn draw on these referents system to interpret and create the ad’s meaning. In order to expose the ideological work of an ad, you must be able to make conscious the unconscious links the ad asks us to make; in other words, you must be able to analyze the specific currency of signs and the particular transfers of meaning that subjects must enact in order for the ad to successfully complete its ideological work. We are created by the ad/ Interpellation: The ad interpellates us; it “hails” us into its meaningful world by offering a subject position within the ideological system of the ad. When we are interpellated, we exchange our self with the subject position created by the ad. The paradox of the interpellation performed by advertisements is that it attempts to turn a mass of concrete individuals into ideological subjects of the ad by addressing them as unique and individual agents who freely choose. We create ourselves in the ad/ Identification and Misrecognition: The ad offers the subject a mirror image with which to identify that is constructed out of various signifiers. This image becomes a symbol through which the subject can experience an imaginary, illusionary feeling (a misrecognition) of self-sameness, of unity. We desire to be this image, to complete and create ourselves through the image, because we lack something that it proclaims to have. Ads actively construct lack; they produce the space for our desire and simultaneously promise its fulfillment. We take meaning from the ad/ Totemism and Social differentiation: Once we have created the meaning, we take this meaning with us; it sets our relationships to other people and/or groups of people. Just as ads create differentiation between their product and others like it, they create social differentiation between groups of people. Ads encourage us align ourselves with—and differentiate ourselves from— others based on our what we buy. Ads ask us to think about our social world—our relationship to it and to others—in terms of individual consumption and not in relation to the social processes of production (who made it and under what conditions,etc.). I ask students to use Williamson to conduct their own critical reading of an advertisement in the form of an oral, in-class presentation. Here are the guidelines: Advertising Analysis (10 points total) Your presentation should be exactly 8 minutes. I am very serious about this requirement and will deduct points from your final score if you are significantly (more than 30 seconds) over or under time. Therefore, you should rehearse several times before presenting to the class. You must bring your advertisement to class. Make copies (black and white) for your classmates if you feel it will enhance your presentation. Throughout your presentation, you should refer directly to the text in order to help your classmates follow your argument. You may want to have another classmate hold the advertisement and assist in pointing out relevant aspects of the text during your presentation. However, any collaboration of this nature should be rehearsed and well planned. Recent Posts Advertising and Propaganda: Critical Approaches Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier Call for Proposals: Paratexts and Pedagogy Deconstructing TV’s Buffy Images of the Disabled Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier at TeachingMedia.Org Call For Proposals: The Video Essay Assignment Tags advertising branding Celebrity and Stardom citizenship Class Consumer Culture Critical Theory Culture jamming digital media electronic media film Film Studies future of news Gender Global Media Ideology Journalism Marshal McLuhan media activism Media Fragmentation Media literacy media policy media production neoliberalism Net Neutrality New Media News participatorymedia Peer review political economy post- feminism post-race Race reality TV Representation Social Media Social Networking sports technophilia technophobia television Television Studies Twitter video games Work and Labor Follow Us Important Links Call for Proposals Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier Curated Editions Instructions & Guidelines Share a Resource Teaching Media Curated Edition Mission Log in and off Register Log in Entries RSS Comments RSS WordPress.org Teaching Resources About The Site Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier Curated Editions

Upload: rodrigo-souza

Post on 28-Oct-2015

231 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements - TEACHING MEDIA

27/07/13 Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements - TEACHING MEDIA

www.teachingmedia.org/williamson-judith-decoding-advertisements/ 1/2

WHERE MEDIA SCHOLARS SHARE RESOURCES & IDEAS FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE CLASSROOM

Search

TEACHING MEDIA

Assignments, Presentations, Readings for Undergraduates Add comments

Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements

I’ve found Judith Williamson’s Decoding Advertisements incredibly useful for introducing students to semiotics,

ideology and subjectivity, as well as the critical study of advertising. I usually use Chapters One and Two.

Students find the reading to be challenging, but I help them out a bit with this handout, which is my breakdown

of her key points about advertising, subjects, and ideology.

How Advertising/Ideology Works/Means through Subjects:

Four processes discussed by Judith Williamson

We create the meaning of the ad/ Currency of Signs: Our unconscious linking of products, images, and emotions

produces the meaning of the ad. The currency of signs does not exist without our active and desiring minds that

complete transactions, transfer meanings and values between signs. The ad draws on existing referent systems—

shared cultural codes, sign systems, and conceptual maps—to construct its meaning, and we in turn draw on

these referents system to interpret and create the ad’s meaning. In order to expose the ideological work of an

ad, you must be able to make conscious the unconscious links the ad asks us to make; in other words, you must

be able to analyze the specific currency of signs and the particular transfers of meaning that subjects must enact

in order for the ad to successfully complete its ideological work.

We are created by the ad/ Interpellation: The ad interpellates us; it “hails” us into its meaningful world by

offering a subject position within the ideological system of the ad. When we are interpellated, we exchange our

self with the subject position created by the ad. The paradox of the interpellation performed by advertisements

is that it attempts to turn a mass of concrete individuals into ideological subjects of the ad by addressing them as

unique and individual agents who freely choose.

We create ourselves in the ad/ Identification and Misrecognition: The ad offers the subject a mirror image with

which to identify that is constructed out of various signifiers. This image becomes a symbol through which the

subject can experience an imaginary, illusionary feeling (a misrecognition) of self-sameness, of unity. We desire

to be this image, to complete and create ourselves through the image, because we lack something that it

proclaims to have. Ads actively construct lack; they produce the space for our desire and simultaneously promise

its fulfillment.

We take meaning from the ad/ Totemism and Social differentiation: Once we have created the meaning, we take

this meaning with us; it sets our relationships to other people and/or groups of people. Just as ads create

differentiation between their product and others like it, they create social differentiation between groups of

people. Ads encourage us align ourselves with—and differentiate ourselves from— others based on our what we

buy. Ads ask us to think about our social world—our relationship to it and to others—in terms of individual

consumption and not in relation to the social processes of production (who made it and under what

conditions,etc.).

I ask students to use Williamson to conduct their own critical reading of an advertisement in the form of an oral,

in-class presentation. Here are the guidelines:

Advertising Analysis

(10 points total)

Your presentation should be exactly 8 minutes. I am very serious about this requirement and will deduct points

from your final score if you are significantly (more than 30 seconds) over or under time. Therefore, you should

rehearse several times before presenting to the class.

You must bring your advertisement to class. Make copies (black and white) for your classmates if you feel it will

enhance your presentation. Throughout your presentation, you should refer directly to the text in order to help

your classmates follow your argument. You may want to have another classmate hold the advertisement and

assist in pointing out relevant aspects of the text during your presentation. However, any collaboration of this

nature should be rehearsed and well planned.

Recent Posts

Advertising and Propaganda: Critical

Approaches

Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier Call for

Proposals: Paratexts and Pedagogy

Deconstructing TV’s Buffy

Images of the Disabled

Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier at

TeachingMedia.Org Call For Proposals:

The Video Essay Assignment

Tags

advertising brandingCelebrity and Stardom citizenshipClass Consumer Culture CriticalTheory Culture jamming digitalmedia electronic media film

Film Studies future of news

Gender Global Media Ideology

Journalism Marshal McLuhan mediaactivism Media Fragmentation

Media literacy mediapolicy media productionneoliberalism Net Neutrality NewMedia Newsparticipatorymedia Peer review

political economy post-

feminism post-race Race reality

TV Representation Social

Media Social Networkingsports technophilia technophobia

television TelevisionStudies Twitter video gamesWork and Labor

Follow Us

Important Links

Call for Proposals

Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier

Curated Editions

Instructions & Guidelines

Share a Resource

Teaching Media Curated Edition Mission

Log in and off

Register

Log in

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

WordPress.org

Teaching Resources

About The Site Cinema Journal Teaching Dossier Curated Editions

Rodrigo
Highlight
Rodrigo
Highlight
Rodrigo
Highlight
Rodrigo
Highlight
Page 2: Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements - TEACHING MEDIA

27/07/13 Judith Williamson, Decoding Advertisements - TEACHING MEDIA

www.teachingmedia.org/williamson-judith-decoding-advertisements/ 2/2

Uses wordpress plugins developed by www.wpdevelop.com

© 2011 TEACHING MEDIA Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Posted by Julie Wilson at 11:13 am Tagged with: advertising, Ideology

Peer Review Form Net neutrality micro-research project.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Your presentation should be formal and expository. You may read directly from a prepared manuscript.

You must actively and effectively engage with the theoretical concepts discussed in our course readings. Most

important here are those concepts discussed by Williamson: ideology, subjects, interpellation,

identification/desire, and signification (signifiers/signifieds/referent systems).

Grading Guidelines

Your oral presentation counts 10 points towards your final score. I will grade your presentation according to

the following criteria:

Presentation (2 points): your delivery and overall performance (time, clarity, eye contact, organization, etc.)

Analysis (4 points): your reading of specific elements of the advertisement

Theory (4 points): your engagement with and demonstrated understanding of our theoretical concepts from

Williamson

Print PDF