julie f kadas unified field theory 012810

8/14/2019 Julie F Kadas Unified Field Theory 012810

1/4

1. The Gravity Problem

I have, since I was very young, thought of the universe in a very different waythan most. E=mc2 is the conventional way of converting matter to energy andvice versa. However, as you know, this equation lacks the ability to accurately

perform the same conversion on a quantum level. I am of the opinion that this issimply because of the persisting desire to include gravity as the longest acting,weakest force. I propose different.

The more I thought of the universe the less I was able to reconcile the idea ofgravity as the longest acting, weakest force. Suppose there is no gravitybecause there is no mass in the universe (as it may have been in the very earlyuniverse):

Question: What would move massless objects if there was no gravitationalattraction?

Answer: An unbalanced equilibrium between heat and cold.

Argument: The laws of thermodynamics state that heat moves toward cold. So,regardless of gravity, objects will move in the direction of the colder of any two(or more) objects in any system. So, massless particles are swimming about inthe early universe just after the Big Bang and if we removed gravity entirely,these objects would still move. Why? Because they lack thermal equilibrium.Hot objects, regardless of their gravitational attraction, are going to move towarda colder part of space in order to find balance.

This process lead me to devise a more complete equation for the conversion ofenergy to anything: E=FT or, Energy equals Force times Time.

Note: I realize that the most current and complete equationfor energy conversion is: E=K+mc2 where K represents thekinetic energy within the system. Bearing in mind that I havechosen to remove gravity and replace it with a simple heatto cold process, one can see how K and m combine in myequation, while the time component represented by c2in theclassic equation is now represented by T in my equation.

Also, my equation incorporates a place in spacetime thatgoes unrecognized in its predominant feature: A singularityis an object whose temperature is Atomic AbsoluteZero. Think about it: The only thing a singularity can do isdraw things towards it. Why? Because it is at AtomicAbsolute Zero. Heat moves toward cold. The only thing thatcan happen to a singularity (or any point or place in spacethat is at AAZ) is that objects (including massless objects like


2/4

light) move toward it. Why would a massless object movetoward anything? Gravity should have no effect. Light ishot, singularities are cold.

A singularity cannot do anything but wait for the world to

pass them by. Because they have no heat, no movingmatter, no kinetic energy of their own with which to movearound or react to anything, they must wait and draw inobjects which are hotter than they are; even if those objectsare only a billionth of a degree warmer than they, in space asingularity will become a popular spot to be drawn to.

Now, the material around the singularity will become hot,dense and full of various interactions, up to and includinggravity but the singularity, in order to incorporate newmaterial must first have the material presented in useful

form. [Diamonds dont become diamonds by just someapplication of force and some carbon; the amounts arespecific and necessary to form a diamond.] Same goes withthe addition of matter/force to a singularity: Essentially, inorder to incorporate anything into a singularity (or any AAZpoint) the material must be properly Tetrised into theobject.

My theory predicts that improperly reverse fractionatedmaterial will cause a very common phenomenon: GammaRay Bursts or GRBs. I believe that Gamma Ray Bursts are

a result of thermal cracking on a huge scale around a pointwhose temperature is Atomic Absolute Zero and whoseincoming hot, dense material was not properly introducedinto the system.

So, gravity is not the longest acting, weakest force. Rather, thermodynamicprocesses are the rootof all movement in the universe. As the universe grows incomplexity and matter is created by quantum interactions, the force we describeas gravity becomes apparent: It emerges from a quantum state. This is why Ibelieve E=mc2 is unacceptable for a reverse conversion from stable matter toquantum particles. It is a threshold which cannot be reverse engineered (movingagainst times arrow,) but must be deduced in the direction of the flow of time andthen recognized as emergent from the quintillions of interactions up to that point.

E=FT


3/4

2. The Problem of the Proper Calculation of the Passage of Time

Pi is a better measuring stick for the passage (and type) of time than theatom (though we currently use Caesium for this purpose in our atomicclocks).

Pi as a more useful measuring stick for the passage of time

As is generally accepted for quantum theory atoms cannot exist in quantum timeand are therefore, a poor gauge for the passage of time or the measurement ofthe expansion or contraction of spacetime.

Question: When is Pi stable after matter is created?

Answer: I have no exact answer for this as I am still working on it.

My theory: Pi is representative of an ever expanding coil, the tightness of whichis representative of the speed with which time is passing and with whichspacetime is growing.

Argument: We are aware that Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle toits diameter. Unfortunately, time has not been accounted for in this measurementand that leaves a vital clue about the nature of Pi unrepresented.

If we think of time using Prof. Hawking's representation of it as a light cone, thenone must conclude that when one measures the diameter of any given circle,there is a beginning to the measurement and an ending to the measurement

during which time has passed. This being the case, and knowing that a beginningand an end cannot happen simultaneously, one must conclude that the passageof time has offset the beginning measurement from the end measurement by alength of time represented as lp (a Planck length). This means that the start pointand the end point can never meet - they pass each other always by length lp[...because time and space are being created not only while the measurement istaking place, but also after the measurement has taken place. Whatever markerswere used to denote 'start' and 'stop' will move away from each other due to theexpansion of spacetime.] Thus, the calculation never actually ends -- it is merelymarked along the way with whatever points we assign it. Essentially, Pi doesntrepresent anything about a circle: It is more accurately described asrepresenting a spiralwhen Time is included in the calculation. I believe this wayof thinking is more useful when contemplating things like the random walk ofphotons in stars. Though the walk is generally a series of straight lines (or sowe are assuming because of their short length[I believe their path experiencesa curvature due to a Correolis type effect which is pervasive throughout theuniverse and contingent upon each photons relative position to other forces,matter and, if we must, gravity] it seems feasible to me that this walk, too, can


4/4

be flattened out so to speak, so that its overall pattern of escape from the innerstar is represented by a misshapen coil.

How does Pi work for measuring time?

If we were to superimpose a dot onto Prof. Hawking's light cone representing astart point, and then add another dot representing an end point, we would seeclearly that these points were offset (if even by the minutest of lengths) and thatpicture would (if drawn though enough time for an observer to reveal a long termpattern) show a spiral or coil that is indistinguishable from the skin of the lightcone which expands (as does the light cone itself) with the passage of time.

Special Note: It is important in every calculation to includea measurement for the passage of time since the flow oftime does not stop while humankind makes theircalculations. Obviously, most calculations such as

measuring the lengths of wood for a new deck on oneshouse need not include a variable for time since the flow oftime will have a negligible effect on the final length andplacement of the wood. But if we are to consider theexpansion of spacetime, quanta and minute matter/forceinteractions, it is vital to include a variable to represent theeffect of the flow of time and the simultaneous creation ofspacetime on these particles.

E=FT

Conclusion

Heat moves toward cold. E=FT. Gamma Ray Bursts are caused by thermalcracking on a grand scale. Singularities are points whose temperature is AtomicAbsolute Zero. Light is drawn to a singularity because it is warmer than thesingularity itself, and gravity is a result of thermodynamic processes in the earlyuniverse which resulted in force reactions which caused objects to spin due tothe growth and expansion of spacetime and the flow of time itself. There is noHiggs Boson because who needs a God Particle when: A) there is no God, andB) the interaction and resultant particle it tries to describe are already accountedfor by my theory.

******

julie f kadas unified field theory 012810

Documents