july 2016 supplier conservation compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · july 2016...

14
July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14 Data pulled August 22, 2016 Page 1 of 14 Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Previous (3/1/2016) Current (Effective 6/1/2016) July 2015 July 2016 California City City of South Lahontan 28% 28% No 12.3% 15.7% 24.8% 14.5% 159.4 14,120 Yucaipa Valley Water District South Coast 34% 20% Yes 4.5% 15.5% 28.0% 1.3% 278.8 45,016 Livingston City of San Joaquin River 29% 29% No 14.3% 14.7% 7.0% 6.8% 131.7 14,898 North Marin Water District San Francisco Bay 24% 0% Yes -10.6% 10.6% 41.0% 18.4% 135.6 61,299 Sanger City of Tulare Lake 26% 26% No 17.3% 8.7% 19.5% 13.3% 144.7 25,664 Red Bluff City of Sacramento River 33% 33% No 27.4% 5.6% 27.0% 16.6% 188.3 14,076 Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District North Coast 4% 0% Yes -5.4% 5.4% -24.8% -4.1% 80.4 602 Adelanto City of South Lahontan 16% 16% No 12.0% 4.0% 16.0% -20.1%# 105.1 32,543 Bakman Water Company Tulare Lake 34% 34% No 30.2% 3.8% 36.3% 35.5% 200.5 16,756 Fortuna City of North Coast 20% 0% Yes -3.1% 3.1% 21.2% 1.0% 91.5 12,032 Bellflower-Somerset Mutual Water Company South Coast 20% 20% Yes 17.6% 2.4% 20.7% 15.4% 87.0 46,300 Fillmore City of South Coast 26% 26% No 23.7% 2.3% 33.9% 25.7% 136.7 15,222 San Lorenzo Valley Water District Central Coast 12% 18% Yes 16.2% 1.8% 38.3% 21.4% 99.5 23,057 Los Banos, City of San Joaquin River 24% 24% No 24.8% -0.8% 27.7% 19.4% 136.9 37,168 Arcata City of North Coast 4% 0% Yes 1.0% -1.0% 10.3% 9.8% 45.9 18,392 Pico Rivera City of South Coast 16% 16% No 17.3% -1.3% 21.6% 14.0% 93.1 39,002 El Segundo City of South Coast 20% 2% Yes 3.7% -1.7% 11.0% 16.8% 80.5 16,654 Tehachapi, City of Tulare Lake 25% 25% No 27.1% -2.1% 38.6% 21.7% 190.0 8,923 Glendora City of South Coast 34% 20% Yes 22.6% -2.6% 38.3% 18.6% 180.2 51,463 Atwater City of San Joaquin River 33% 33% No 35.7% -2.7% 48.7% 31.9% 245.4 29,500 Monrovia City of South Coast 26% 12% Yes 14.8% -2.8% 23.5% 14.8% 144.3 37,406 Turlock City of San Joaquin River 29% 16% Yes 19.5% -3.5% 35.0% 24.6% 174.5 72,050 Monterey Park City of South Coast 20% 14% Yes 18.1% -4.1% 18.8% 17.1% 86.6 62,183 City of Newman Water Department San Joaquin River 21% 21% No 25.2% -4.2% 31.3% 19.3% 141.0 10,668 Hi-Desert Water District Colorado River 13% 0% Yes 4.3% -4.3% 13.8% 2.3% 97.0 24,725 Covina City of South Coast 26% 12% Yes 16.5% -4.5% 24.9% 14.7% 122.1 33,300 Nipomo Community Services District Central Coast 28% 23% Yes 28.0% -5.0% 37.1% 28.0% 132.9 13,348 Paramount City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 5.3% -5.3% 18.5% 7.6% 58.3 55,302 Humboldt Community Service District North Coast 12% 0% Yes 5.9% -5.9% 12.3% 8.1% 63.3 22,842 San Buenaventura City of South Coast 16% 16% No 21.9% -5.9% 24.7% 22.4% 78.1 113,478 State-mandated Conservation Standard Total Population Served Estimated July 2016 Monthly R-GPCD Monthly Savings (as compared to 2013) Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier* (as compared to 2013) Missed Conservation Standard By Did Supplier Self- certify? * Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Upload: others

Post on 10-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 1 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

California City City of South Lahontan 28% 28% No 12.3% 15.7% 24.8% 14.5% 159.4 14,120Yucaipa Valley Water District South Coast 34% 20% Yes 4.5% 15.5% 28.0% 1.3% 278.8 45,016Livingston City of San Joaquin River 29% 29% No 14.3% 14.7% 7.0% 6.8% 131.7 14,898North Marin Water District San Francisco Bay 24% 0% Yes -10.6% 10.6% 41.0% 18.4% 135.6 61,299Sanger City of Tulare Lake 26% 26% No 17.3% 8.7% 19.5% 13.3% 144.7 25,664Red Bluff City of Sacramento River 33% 33% No 27.4% 5.6% 27.0% 16.6% 188.3 14,076Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District North Coast 4% 0% Yes -5.4% 5.4% -24.8% -4.1% 80.4 602Adelanto City of South Lahontan 16% 16% No 12.0% 4.0% 16.0% -20.1%# 105.1 32,543Bakman Water Company Tulare Lake 34% 34% No 30.2% 3.8% 36.3% 35.5% 200.5 16,756Fortuna City of North Coast 20% 0% Yes -3.1% 3.1% 21.2% 1.0% 91.5 12,032Bellflower-Somerset Mutual Water Company South Coast 20% 20% Yes 17.6% 2.4% 20.7% 15.4% 87.0 46,300Fillmore City of South Coast 26% 26% No 23.7% 2.3% 33.9% 25.7% 136.7 15,222San Lorenzo Valley Water District Central Coast 12% 18% Yes 16.2% 1.8% 38.3% 21.4% 99.5 23,057Los Banos, City of San Joaquin River 24% 24% No 24.8% -0.8% 27.7% 19.4% 136.9 37,168Arcata City of North Coast 4% 0% Yes 1.0% -1.0% 10.3% 9.8% 45.9 18,392Pico Rivera City of South Coast 16% 16% No 17.3% -1.3% 21.6% 14.0% 93.1 39,002El Segundo City of South Coast 20% 2% Yes 3.7% -1.7% 11.0% 16.8% 80.5 16,654Tehachapi, City of Tulare Lake 25% 25% No 27.1% -2.1% 38.6% 21.7% 190.0 8,923Glendora City of South Coast 34% 20% Yes 22.6% -2.6% 38.3% 18.6% 180.2 51,463Atwater City of San Joaquin River 33% 33% No 35.7% -2.7% 48.7% 31.9% 245.4 29,500Monrovia City of South Coast 26% 12% Yes 14.8% -2.8% 23.5% 14.8% 144.3 37,406Turlock City of San Joaquin River 29% 16% Yes 19.5% -3.5% 35.0% 24.6% 174.5 72,050Monterey Park City of South Coast 20% 14% Yes 18.1% -4.1% 18.8% 17.1% 86.6 62,183City of Newman Water Department San Joaquin River 21% 21% No 25.2% -4.2% 31.3% 19.3% 141.0 10,668Hi-Desert Water District Colorado River 13% 0% Yes 4.3% -4.3% 13.8% 2.3% 97.0 24,725Covina City of South Coast 26% 12% Yes 16.5% -4.5% 24.9% 14.7% 122.1 33,300Nipomo Community Services District Central Coast 28% 23% Yes 28.0% -5.0% 37.1% 28.0% 132.9 13,348Paramount City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 5.3% -5.3% 18.5% 7.6% 58.3 55,302Humboldt Community Service District North Coast 12% 0% Yes 5.9% -5.9% 12.3% 8.1% 63.3 22,842San Buenaventura City of South Coast 16% 16% No 21.9% -5.9% 24.7% 22.4% 78.1 113,478

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

jhartman
Typewritten Text
# Potential software issue
Page 2: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 2 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Exeter City of Tulare Lake 34% 21% Yes 27.0% -6.0% 34.6% 25.8% 177.6 10,572Modesto, City of San Joaquin River 33% 20% Yes 26.3% -6.3% 32.4% 25.7% 207.2 223,432Daly City City of San Francisco Bay 8% 4% Yes 10.6% -6.6% 14.4% 20.1% 50.1 109,139Ceres City of San Joaquin River 26% 13% Yes 19.8% -6.8% 26.6% 21.3% 124.9 47,639Golden State Water Company Norwalk South Coast 8% 0% Yes 7.0% -7.0% 23.7% 11.2% 68.8 44,466Brea City of South Coast 24% 15% Yes 22.4% -7.4% 26.5% 26.1% 97.3 43,328Vernon City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 7.5% -7.5% 8.6% 15.5% 38.4 112Crestline Village Water District South Lahontan 8% 0% Yes 8.3% -8.3% 26.0% 10.6% 62.7 7,686Arroyo Grande City of Central Coast 28% 28% No 36.5% -8.5% 41.3% 35.1% 98.7 17,636Golden State Water Company Florence Graham South Coast 8% 0% Yes 9.2% -9.2% 14.8% 9.6% 55.1 65,492Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services District South Lahontan 24% 0% Yes 9.6% -9.6% 24.9% 14.4% 112.0 20,913Olivehurst Public Utility District Sacramento River 33% 10% Yes 19.6% -9.6% 34.5% 18.9% 235.6 19,509San Luis Obispo City of Central Coast 12% 12% No 21.6% -9.6% 26.4% 23.3% 58.4 46,117California Water Service Company Dominguez South Coast 15% 0% Yes 10.1% -10.1% 8.5% 11.1% 82.3 142,743South Tahoe Public Utilities District North Lahontan 17% 0% Yes 10.1% -10.1% 27.6% 7.8% 107.4 33,124Greenfield, City of Central Coast 14% 5% Yes 15.1% -10.1% 26.9% 15.1% 72.4 17,898Lathrop, City of San Joaquin River 18% 18% No 28.3% -10.3% 34.9% 20.4% 129.9 20,353El Monte City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 10.3% -10.3% 19.0% 13.7% 56.3 22,968City of Big Bear Lake, Dept of Water & Power South Coast 13% 0% Yes 10.4% -10.4% 20.5% 4.1% 75.9 25,822Lompoc City of Central Coast 12% 12% No 22.5% -10.5% 18.0% 28.6% 51.7 41,541Hawthorne City of South Coast 16% 0% Yes 10.6% -10.6% 10.1% 10.4% 66.2 44,631Twentynine Palms Water District Colorado River 24% 0% Yes 10.7% -10.7% 19.6% 9.0% 134.0 18,795Torrance City of South Coast 19% 0% Yes 10.9% -10.9% 24.7% 7.5% 89.9 105,928Valley County Water District South Coast 14% 10% Yes 20.9% -10.9% 26.4% 20.1% 74.9 71,003Inglewood City of South Coast 11% 5% Yes 16.2% -11.2% 15.3% 14.5% 72.6 86,418West Kern Water District Tulare Lake 25% 0% Yes 11.3% -11.3% 21.7% 13.0% 151.5 20,591South Gate City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 11.3% -11.3% 14.5% 3.3% 56.8 88,654Bakersfield City of Tulare Lake 31% 9% Yes 20.4% -11.4% 31.5% 16.6% 229.9 145,751Coastside County Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 11.5% -11.5% 24.2% 19.0% 42.6 16,704Colton, City of South Coast 18% 0% Yes 11.6% -11.6% 24.7% 10.6% 127.5 47,429

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 3: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 3 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Fallbrook Public Utility District South Coast 28% 0% Yes 12.3% -12.3% 30.5% 12.3% 191.4 34,894Marin Municipal Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 12.5% -12.5% 23.2% 11.4% 109.7 189,400San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 12.5% -12.5% 16.0% 12.6% 41.2 859,276Whittier City of South Coast 17% 0% Yes 12.7% -12.7% 24.3% 16.9% 109.7 49,954McKinleyville Community Service District North Coast 4% 0% Yes 12.7% -12.7% 17.9% 12.4% 61.4 16,900Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 29 South Coast 36% 0% Yes 12.8% -12.8% 27.1% 9.7% 289.0 22,247Estero Municipal Improvement District San Francisco Bay 12% 0% Yes 12.8% -12.8% 17.5% 8.4% 67.9 37,339La Habra City of Public Works South Coast 28% 0% Yes 12.8% -12.8% 29.5% 17.0% 100.0 63,118Folsom City of Sacramento River 28% 0% Yes 12.8% -12.8% 32.8% 10.8% 256.3 63,951Vallejo City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 12.8% -12.8% 26.2% 9.2% 94.1 125,200Yuba City City of Sacramento River 28% 15% Yes 27.9% -12.9% 32.8% 29.7% 143.9 73,202Palmdale Water District South Lahontan 28% 10% Yes 23.1% -13.1% 35.3% 21.6% 143.4 116,473Mammoth Community Water District South Lahontan 17% 17% No 30.3% -13.3% 46.6% 26.9% 92.6 16,739Golden State Water Company Southwest South Coast 9% 0% Yes 13.3% -13.3% 15.8% 11.0% 65.8 271,677California-American Water Company San Diego District South Coast 8% 0% Yes 13.4% -13.4% 32.8% 10.4% 77.3 94,043Imperial, City of Colorado River 20% 0% Yes 13.6% -13.6% 21.5% 9.6% 108.6 18,022Golden State Water Company Artesia South Coast 9% 0% Yes 13.6% -13.6% 16.6% 10.2% 75.2 47,978East Palo Alto, City of San Francisco Bay 8% 8% No 21.6% -13.6% 37.9% 28.5% 54.5 29,143Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District South Coast 27% 0% Yes 13.7% -13.7% 33.7% 24.6% 124.0 151,236Norwalk City of South Coast 17% 0% Yes 13.8% -13.8% 18.5% 13.0% 99.9 18,361Eureka City of North Coast 4% 0% Yes 14.0% -14.0% 14.2% 16.9% 69.9 27,052San Juan Water District Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 14.0% -14.0% 41.0% 13.5% 533.9 32,779Fairfield City of Sacramento River 19% 0% Yes 14.0% -14.0% 27.6% 13.1% 112.0 108,392Long Beach City of South Coast 9% 0% Yes 14.0% -14.0% 18.9% 12.4% 65.7 478,306Oxnard City of South Coast 12% 0% Yes 14.2% -14.2% 21.4% 13.9% 57.0 196,720Arvin Community Services District Tulare Lake 21% 0% Yes 14.2% -14.2% 30.5% 10.0% 106.8 20,499Coachella City of Colorado River 20% 0% Yes 14.3% -14.3% 20.6% 10.8% 112.2 45,407Huntington Park City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 14.3% -14.3% 16.3% 14.2% 45.8 64,219Los Angeles Department of Water and Power South Coast 14% 0% Yes 14.4% -14.4% 21.1% 15.1% 81.8 4,061,504Lodi City of Public Works Department San Joaquin River 30% 6% Yes 20.4% -14.4% 29.4% 17.6% 180.7 63,219

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 4: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 4 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Golden State Water Company S San Gabriel South Coast 10% 0% Yes 14.5% -14.5% 15.6% 12.9% 66.6 27,656Mesa Water District South Coast 13% 0% Yes 14.5% -14.5% 24.2% 10.3% 141.2 110,000Goleta Water District Central Coast 12% 12% No 26.7% -14.7% 33.5% 32.2% 52.3 86,946Rubidoux Community Service District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 14.7% -14.7% 29.6% 14.7% 124.7 32,200Golden State Water Company Bell-Bell Gardens South Coast 8% 0% Yes 14.8% -14.8% 19.9% 15.6% 57.0 57,934Golden State Water Company Culver City South Coast 16% 0% Yes 14.8% -14.8% 19.8% 14.0% 74.2 36,215Valley Water Company South Coast 34% 0% Yes 14.9% -14.9% 34.6% 13.6% 352.8 9,900California-American Water Company Monterey District Central Coast 8% 0% Yes 14.9% -14.9% 17.1% 16.1% 69.2 91,884Joshua Basin Water District Colorado River 20% 0% Yes 15.0% -15.0% 36.8% 18.4% 94.9 9,514North Tahoe Public Utility District North Lahontan 25% 0% Yes 15.0% -15.0% 26.8% 10.4% 182.0 7,500Rowland Water District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 15.0% -15.0% 18.7% 14.7% 89.4 58,000Laguna Beach County Water District South Coast 24% 0% Yes 15.0% -15.0% 26.9% 13.0% 93.5 19,121Corona City of South Coast 28% 0% Yes 15.0% -15.0% 25.4% 12.9% 128.9 168,070Lake Hemet Municipal Water District South Coast 26% 15% Yes 30.1% -15.1% 46.1% 29.7% 138.3 52,914Rialto City of South Coast 26% 0% Yes 15.1% -15.1% 29.1% 14.4% 139.8 54,453Casitas Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 0% Yes 15.2% -15.2% 40.9% 19.2% 124.5 9,944California Water Service Company East Los Angeles South Coast 8% 0% Yes 15.3% -15.3% 17.6% 15.0% 46.6 158,725Pinedale County Water District Tulare Lake 14% 14% No 29.3% -15.3% 29.4% 28.5% 148.5 16,735Irvine Ranch Water District South Coast 8% 0% Yes 15.3% -15.3% 22.1% 11.6% 74.8 392,585Loma Linda City of South Coast 30% 0% Yes 15.3% -15.3% 28.1% 12.9% 169.2 23,751Vista Irrigation District South Coast 12% 0% Yes 15.4% -15.4% 33.5% 13.1% 97.1 127,699Windsor, Town of North Coast 16% 0% Yes 15.4% -15.4% 27.0% 13.1% 109.3 27,183Camrosa Water District South Coast 24% 0% Yes 15.5% -15.5% 32.8% 18.3% 221.5 27,037Norco City of South Coast 36% 0% Yes 15.7% -15.7% 23.8% 10.1% 218.8 25,891Santa Ana City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 15.9% -15.9% 21.9% 15.4% 68.7 332,005El Dorado Irrigation District Sacramento River 24% 0% Yes 15.9% -15.9% 33.9% 17.4% 303.9 118,500San Gabriel County Water District South Coast 18% 0% Yes 15.9% -15.9% 26.5% 11.8% 97.2 45,000Tulare, City of Tulare Lake 30% 0% Yes 16.0% -16.0% 25.8% 13.5% 168.1 63,837Anaheim City of South Coast 13% 0% Yes 16.1% -16.1% 27.7% 8.2% 96.4 360,972Seal Beach City of South Coast 12% 0% Yes 16.1% -16.1% 22.9% 13.3% 69.6 25,561

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 5: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 5 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Huntington Beach City of South Coast 13% 0% Yes 16.2% -16.2% 25.7% 13.2% 96.9 196,041Azusa City of South Coast 18% 3% Yes 19.3% -16.3% 26.8% 18.8% 91.5 106,400Cerritos City of South Coast 21% 0% Yes 16.3% -16.3% 27.6% 14.8% 133.1 49,041Ontario City of South Coast 20% 0% Yes 16.4% -16.4% 26.2% 15.5% 108.2 168,777Reedley City of Tulare Lake 22% 0% Yes 16.4% -16.4% 34.8% 19.1% 86.3 24,194Montecito Water District Central Coast 32% 31% Yes 47.4% -16.4% 50.4% 48.9% 206.5 13,500Redwood City City of San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 16.4% -16.4% 14.2% 10.2% 75.9 87,023Orchard Dale Water District South Coast 8% 0% Yes 16.4% -16.4% 22.0% 14.2% 74.3 25,000El Centro City of Colorado River 20% 0% Yes 16.5% -16.5% 22.3% 14.9% 127.1 44,311Susanville City of North Lahontan 33% 0% Yes 16.5% -16.5% 32.5% 14.8% 328.4 8,497Riverside City of South Coast 25% 0% Yes 16.5% -16.5% 30.7% 15.0% 145.0 301,228Palo Alto City of San Francisco Bay 24% 0% Yes 16.6% -16.6% 31.1% 12.9% 105.1 64,403Camarillo City of South Coast 20% 3% Yes 19.7% -16.7% 26.7% 18.0% 92.2 47,405Crescent City City of North Coast 16% 0% Yes 16.7% -16.7% 17.1% 18.6% 67.0 18,382San Diego City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 16.8% -16.8% 28.9% 14.1% 71.8 1,339,958Western Municipal Water District of Riverside South Coast 28% 0% Yes 16.9% -16.9% 34.6% 14.6% 174.6 96,139Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District South Coast 32% 0% Yes 16.9% -16.9% 28.7% 12.4% 215.2 43,111California Water Service Company Kern River Valley Tulare Lake 25% 0% Yes 16.9% -16.9% 21.0% 22.0% 123.8 5,349Big Bear City Community Services District South Coast 13% 0% Yes 16.9% -16.9% 25.6% 8.7% 97.0 12,411West Valley Water District South Coast 28% 0% Yes 17.0% -17.0% 26.5% 11.6% 175.9 81,379Shasta Lake City of Sacramento River 25% 10% Yes 27.0% -17.0% 37.9% 21.8% 202.2 10,293Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 40 South Lahontan 28% 0% Yes 17.0% -17.0% 40.1% 10.1% 212.0 207,659Westminster City of South Coast 13% 0% Yes 17.0% -17.0% 31.2% 15.9% 81.9 96,046Vaughn Water Company Tulare Lake 30% 0% Yes 17.0% -17.0% 29.6% 15.9% 457.9 31,430Manhattan Beach City of South Coast 18% 0% Yes 17.1% -17.1% 23.4% 15.0% 92.3 35,996Sonoma City of San Francisco Bay 28% 0% Yes 17.2% -17.2% 46.8% 33.6% 144.5 11,579Bella Vista Water District Sacramento River 33% 33% No 50.2% -17.2% 57.6% 38.6% 460.6 18,426Napa City of San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 17.3% -17.3% 28.3% 15.1% 113.2 86,848Santa Rosa City of North Coast 16% 0% Yes 17.3% -17.3% 43.8% 30.8% 78.0 173,071Otay Water District South Coast 12% 0% Yes 17.3% -17.3% 29.2% 13.6% 95.2 220,200

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 6: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 6 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Rohnert Park City of North Coast 16% 0% Yes 17.3% -17.3% 37.4% 24.3% 73.5 43,398Chino City of South Coast 21% 0% Yes 17.4% -17.4% 25.6% 15.1% 102.0 74,639Moulton Niguel Water District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 17.5% -17.5% 26.5% 15.5% 116.7 172,068Jurupa Community Service District South Coast 23% 0% Yes 17.5% -17.5% 31.6% 12.0% 181.6 118,731Rio Vista, city of Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 17.6% -17.6% 41.7% 22.4% 222.2 8,324Las Virgenes Municipal Water District South Coast 35% 0% Yes 17.7% -17.7% 37.2% 15.7% 197.6 75,384Montebello Land and Water Company South Coast 9% 0% Yes 17.8% -17.8% 18.8% 15.4% 73.8 32,219Lakewood City of South Coast 12% 0% Yes 17.8% -17.8% 29.0% 14.9% 83.0 59,081Eastern Municipal Water District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 17.8% -17.8% 27.2% 14.4% 122.9 554,372Oceanside City of South Coast 12% 0% Yes 17.9% -17.9% 31.6% 15.0% 88.7 175,948California Water Service Company Hermosa/Redondo South Coast 19% 0% Yes 17.9% -17.9% 20.7% 18.4% 79.2 95,954Lake Arrowhead Community Services District South Lahontan 13% 0% Yes 17.9% -17.9% 35.2% 16.4% 78.6 24,846Lomita City of South Coast 20% 0% Yes 17.9% -17.9% 20.5% 16.2% 86.5 20,463Santa Cruz City of Central Coast 8% 8% No 26.0% -18.0% 30.6% 21.9% 49.2 96,094Soledad, City of Central Coast 24% 0% Yes 18.1% -18.1% 19.9% 18.6% 89.1 16,729California Water Service Company Mid Peninsula San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 18.3% -18.3% 25.3% 16.9% 78.7 135,458Downey City of South Coast 14% 0% Yes 18.4% -18.4% 26.1% 14.4% 93.8 111,931East Bay Municipal Utilities District San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 18.4% -18.4% 30.9% 18.7% 83.7 1,400,000Chino Hills City of South Coast 28% 0% Yes 18.5% -18.5% 30.5% 17.4% 130.5 77,596Santa Maria City of Central Coast 16% 0% Yes 18.5% -18.5% 21.1% 17.5% 83.9 102,087Orange City of South Coast 21% 0% Yes 18.5% -18.5% 27.5% 14.4% 119.4 140,094Vallecitos Water District South Coast 16% 0% Yes 18.5% -18.5% 36.5% 15.1% 104.4 96,985Sierra Madre City of South Coast 30% 0% Yes 18.5% -18.5% 24.1% 13.2% 192.3 11,100Hesperia Water District City of South Lahontan 28% 0% Yes 18.6% -18.6% 34.3% 15.7% 140.4 93,226Hemet City of South Coast 14% 0% Yes 18.7% -18.7% 28.2% 23.6% 64.8 29,982Morgan Hill City of Central Coast 27% 0% Yes 18.7% -18.7% 42.1% 16.3% 138.9 40,807Santa Monica City of South Coast 20% 0% Yes 18.7% -18.7% 24.7% 20.0% 78.1 93,640Walnut Valley Water District South Coast 26% 0% Yes 18.7% -18.7% 28.9% 14.8% 146.2 113,236Sunnyvale City of San Francisco Bay 16% 5% Yes 23.7% -18.7% 36.7% 25.6% 67.6 148,372Helix Water District South Coast 12% 0% Yes 18.7% -18.7% 31.7% 16.5% 90.5 271,759

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 7: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 7 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Golden State Water Company West Orange South Coast 9% 0% Yes 18.7% -18.7% 28.0% 17.4% 75.6 111,904Mission Springs Water District Colorado River 24% 0% Yes 18.8% -18.8% 27.7% 24.2% 129.8 37,600San Fernando City of South Coast 22% 0% Yes 18.9% -18.9% 26.3% 16.6% 105.3 23,645Carlsbad Municipal Water District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 19.0% -19.0% 29.7% 15.6% 115.4 86,596Watsonville City of Central Coast 20% 0% Yes 19.0% -19.0% 24.8% 19.0% 80.6 65,966Millbrae City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 19.0% -19.0% 31.5% 20.2% 78.8 21,532Placer County Water Agency Sacramento River 28% 0% Yes 19.2% -19.2% 14.2% 21.9% 211.3 98,128Garden Grove City of South Coast 20% 0% Yes 19.2% -19.2% 23.5% 14.6% 80.5 177,020Blythe City of Colorado River 28% 0% Yes 19.2% -19.2% 11.9% 13.5% 116.7 13,839Pittsburg City of San Francisco Bay 19% 0% Yes 19.3% -19.3% 26.9% 18.3% 97.8 67,628Lincoln City of Sacramento River 28% 0% Yes 19.3% -19.3% 38.3% 17.9% 188.5 47,339San Dieguito Water District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 19.3% -19.3% 26.0% 16.1% 129.9 37,376Suburban Water Systems Whittier/La Mirada South Coast 28% 0% Yes 19.4% -19.4% 28.7% 16.6% 122.2 115,000Discovery Bay Community Services District San Joaquin River 29% 0% Yes 19.4% -19.4% 40.8% 14.8% 215.3 15,030Glendale City of South Coast 18% 0% Yes 19.4% -19.4% 27.4% 17.6% 91.7 193,300Sweetwater Authority South Coast 8% 0% Yes 19.5% -19.5% 27.1% 16.5% 68.3 188,886Santa Fe Irrigation District South Coast 28% 0% Yes 19.5% -19.5% 47.5% 12.8% 519.9 19,839Nevada Irrigation District Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 19.5% -19.5% 36.0% 18.5% 245.8 44,761Newhall County Water District South Coast 25% 0% Yes 19.5% -19.5% 34.4% 17.9% 131.1 45,036Olivenhain Municipal Water District South Coast 24% 0% Yes 19.6% -19.6% 39.8% 13.7% 165.5 84,351Castaic Lake Water Agency Santa Clarita Water Division South Coast 28% 0% Yes 19.6% -19.6% 38.6% 17.1% 168.0 122,998Fullerton City of South Coast 21% 0% Yes 19.7% -19.7% 27.6% 17.3% 124.6 138,000Pismo Beach City of Central Coast 22% 0% Yes 19.8% -19.8% 29.2% 18.3% 110.7 7,861Martinez City of San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 19.8% -19.8% 42.2% 17.0% 59.8 35,375Pomona City of South Coast 18% 0% Yes 19.9% -19.9% 31.5% 21.4% 52.9 155,604Golden State Water Company Placentia South Coast 17% 0% Yes 19.9% -19.9% 34.7% 16.6% 106.6 46,543Santa Clara City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 19.9% -19.9% 19.9% 16.8% 81.6 120,973Delano City of Tulare Lake 21% 0% Yes 20.0% -20.0% 26.7% 20.0% 115.1 55,459La Verne City of South Coast 30% 0% Yes 20.0% -20.0% 35.6% 18.0% 136.0 32,228Roseville City of Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 20.1% -20.1% 39.2% 19.6% 144.7 129,262

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 8: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 8 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Hollister City of Central Coast 20% 0% Yes 20.1% -20.1% 30.9% 17.2% 114.2 20,784Redlands City of South Coast 33% 0% Yes 20.2% -20.2% 20.5% 11.4% 214.4 85,276Sacramento County Water Agency Sacramento River 24% 0% Yes 20.2% -20.2% 42.0% 20.9% 171.5 179,154California Water Service Company Stockton San Joaquin River 18% 0% Yes 20.3% -20.3% 28.9% 18.3% 101.0 171,148Calaveras County Water District San Joaquin River 13% 0% Yes 20.4% -20.4% 38.9% 19.4% 143.1 20,698Pasadena City of South Coast 26% 0% Yes 20.4% -20.4% 25.7% 18.3% 117.5 166,545San Juan Capistrano City of South Coast 27% 0% Yes 20.4% -20.4% 27.6% 15.9% 109.2 39,189Tracy City of San Joaquin River 25% 0% Yes 20.5% -20.5% 33.8% 20.8% 140.5 88,028Hanford City of Tulare Lake 23% 0% Yes 20.5% -20.5% 13.4% 19.2% 137.3 59,338Cucamonga Valley Water District South Coast 30% 0% Yes 20.5% -20.5% 32.8% 19.0% 153.7 203,815California Water Service Company Palos Verdes South Coast 36% 0% Yes 20.6% -20.6% 33.1% 18.2% 211.4 70,029Port Hueneme City of South Coast 8% 0% Yes 20.6% -20.6% 15.2% 13.3% 74.4 21,555San Bernardino City of South Coast 24% 0% Yes 20.6% -20.6% 29.8% 18.2% 142.0 199,634Beverly Hills City of South Coast 32% 0% Yes 20.7% -20.7% 21.6% 21.4% 131.5 51,403California Water Service Company Visalia Tulare Lake 29% 0% Yes 20.7% -20.7% 28.3% 18.6% 175.0 141,103Santa Paula City of South Coast 26% 0% Yes 20.8% -20.8% 30.4% 17.4% 110.5 30,009Shafter City of Tulare Lake 32% 0% Yes 20.8% -20.8% 32.6% 23.0% 159.5 19,347Truckee-Donner Public Utilities District North Lahontan 25% 0% Yes 20.8% -20.8% 39.1% 19.2% 145.3 32,776Victorville Water District South Lahontan 24% 0% Yes 20.8% -20.8% 32.9% 20.9% 152.9 126,451Healdsburg City of North Coast 24% 0% Yes 20.9% -20.9% 27.9% 20.9% 122.6 11,815Rancho California Water District South Coast 32% 0% Yes 20.9% -20.9% 41.7% 22.9% 248.8 149,092Crescenta Valley Water District South Coast 18% 0% Yes 21.0% -21.0% 32.5% 18.9% 109.4 32,385La Palma City of South Coast 13% 0% Yes 21.2% -21.2% 27.4% 19.4% 84.3 15,896San Bruno City of San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 21.2% -21.2% 27.0% 18.9% 51.7 43,798Newport Beach City of South Coast 21% 0% Yes 21.4% -21.4% 28.0% 18.4% 122.9 66,550Soquel Creek Water District Central Coast 8% 8% No 29.5% -21.5% 32.7% 25.4% 63.9 40,410Indian Wells Valley Water District South Lahontan 32% 0% Yes 21.5% -21.5% 27.3% 15.4% 210.0 31,120Oildale Mutual Water Company Tulare Lake 31% 0% Yes 21.5% -21.5% 32.3% 22.2% 235.7 34,133Valley of the Moon Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 21.6% -21.6% 38.1% 32.6% 90.1 23,782Buena Park City of South Coast 13% 0% Yes 21.6% -21.6% 27.9% 20.6% 91.4 83,347

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 9: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 9 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Marina Coast Water District Central Coast 11% 11% No 32.6% -21.6% 31.1% 34.6% 58.9 34,235Scotts Valley Water District Central Coast 16% 0% Yes 21.6% -21.6% 27.7% 20.9% 85.2 10,309Golden State Water Company Bay Point San Francisco Bay 12% 0% Yes 21.6% -21.6% 31.6% 22.9% 63.6 22,258Upland City of South Coast 34% 0% Yes 21.7% -21.7% 35.7% 21.1% 188.8 76,469Clovis City of Tulare Lake 33% 0% Yes 21.7% -21.7% 36.3% 19.3% 237.5 111,927San Gabriel Valley Fontana Water Company South Coast 26% 0% Yes 21.7% -21.7% 33.5% 20.9% 124.4 209,035Pico Water District South Coast 18% 0% Yes 21.8% -21.8% 22.9% 24.4% 92.8 25,284Tustin City of South Coast 21% 0% Yes 21.8% -21.8% 31.9% 18.7% 137.6 67,700Sweetwater Springs Water District North Coast 16% 0% Yes 21.9% -21.9% 28.9% 19.7% 81.7 7,799Morro Bay City of Central Coast 12% 0% Yes 21.9% -21.9% 23.1% 23.9% 66.6 10,284Padre Dam Municipal Water District South Coast 12% 0% Yes 22.0% -22.0% 39.7% 20.5% 94.1 88,995East Niles Community Service District Tulare Lake 33% 0% Yes 22.1% -22.1% 34.6% 21.5% 223.7 31,772Davis City of Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 22.2% -22.2% 31.8% 20.9% 123.7 68,320Petaluma City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 22.3% -22.3% 29.6% 22.3% 87.6 61,955Yreka, City of North Coast 30% 0% Yes 22.3% -22.3% 24.4% 22.3% 205.1 7,840Kerman, City of Tulare Lake 29% 0% Yes 22.3% -22.3% 30.8% 20.5% 187.9 14,359Alco Water Service Central Coast 24% 0% Yes 22.4% -22.4% 21.1% 20.4% 103.0 29,459Fair Oaks Water District Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 22.5% -22.5% 40.2% 22.8% 292.6 36,226Fountain Valley City of South Coast 13% 0% Yes 22.5% -22.5% 29.9% 20.9% 97.1 59,227Mountain House Community Services District San Joaquin River 21% 0% Yes 22.6% -22.6% 35.6% 22.4% 138.3 15,465Lincoln Avenue Water Company South Coast 26% 0% Yes 22.6% -22.6% 30.5% 14.7% 124.9 16,126Madera City of San Joaquin River 26% 0% Yes 22.7% -22.7% 33.1% 22.1% 111.2 65,474Lamont Public Utility District Tulare Lake 25% 0% Yes 22.7% -22.7% 30.8% 22.4% 155.8 20,009Golden State Water Company Cordova Sacramento River 32% 0% Yes 22.7% -22.7% 39.4% 21.5% 216.1 43,767Ventura County Waterworks District No. 8 South Coast 26% 0% Yes 22.7% -22.7% 33.6% 21.7% 141.3 90,687Park Water Company South Coast 8% 0% Yes 22.8% -22.8% 28.1% 25.5% 49.9 125,784Ramona Municipal Water District South Coast 20% 0% Yes 22.8% -22.8% 39.3% 20.2% 157.0 36,564Atascadero Mutual Water Company Central Coast 28% 0% Yes 22.9% -22.9% 38.0% 23.5% 140.2 31,491Monte Vista Water District South Coast 22% 0% Yes 22.9% -22.9% 38.5% 25.0% 106.7 55,995Wasco City of Tulare Lake 32% 17% Yes 40.0% -23.0% 28.9% 38.3% 108.1 26,159

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 10: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 10 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Rosamond Community Service District South Lahontan 24% 0% Yes 23.0% -23.0% 43.5% 28.5% 143.4 17,700Sunny Slope Water Company South Coast 22% 0% Yes 23.1% -23.1% 29.8% 22.6% 96.7 30,700Elk Grove Water Service Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 23.1% -23.1% 40.5% 21.7% 146.4 44,289Suburban Water Systems San Jose Hills South Coast 22% 0% Yes 23.1% -23.1% 29.8% 21.2% 102.8 178,500Banning City of Colorado River 28% 0% Yes 23.1% -23.1% 39.3% 22.0% 157.3 30,325Diablo Water District San Joaquin River 23% 0% Yes 23.1% -23.1% 34.6% 23.4% 118.0 40,793Rubio Canyon Land and Water Association South Coast 34% 0% Yes 23.2% -23.2% 34.6% 26.3% 176.4 9,600San Bernardino County Service Area 70J South Coast 24% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 36.8% 25.3% 119.3 11,577Riverbank City of San Joaquin River 30% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 21.3% 20.8% 171.1 23,734Georgetown Divide Public Utilities District Sacramento River 29% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 40.5% 21.9% 230.6 9,018Stockton City of San Joaquin River 26% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 36.3% 23.0% 141.6 177,808Lakeside Water District South Coast 12% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 36.0% 21.1% 96.9 35,500Anderson, City of Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 30.2% 26.1% 174.3 11,147Mid-Peninsula Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 32.3% 23.1% 96.9 26,924Trabuco Canyon Water District South Coast 28% 0% Yes 23.3% -23.3% 40.1% 21.2% 104.6 13,175Coalinga City of Tulare Lake 30% 5% Yes 28.4% -23.4% 45.8% 38.3% 160.7 16,529Amador Water Agency San Joaquin River 21% 0% Yes 23.5% -23.5% 41.6% 29.9% 103.3 23,347Indio City of Colorado River 27% 0% Yes 23.5% -23.5% 23.7% 20.9% 165.3 88,411Santa Barbara City of Central Coast 12% 12% No 35.5% -23.5% 36.3% 38.0% 67.9 93,426California Water Service Company South San Francisco San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 23.6% -23.6% 24.1% 24.6% 42.0 61,782Tuolumne Utilities District San Joaquin River 21% 0% Yes 23.6% -23.6% 41.8% 25.1% 84.6 30,809California-American Water Company Los Angeles District South Coast 26% 0% Yes 23.6% -23.6% 31.3% 22.3% 145.6 101,777Ventura County Waterworks District No 1 South Coast 30% 0% Yes 23.8% -23.8% 34.7% 22.6% 154.7 38,703Paso Robles City of Central Coast 24% 0% Yes 23.8% -23.8% 37.5% 26.0% 125.1 30,522Redding City of Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 23.8% -23.8% 32.6% 22.4% 254.0 91,207West Sacramento City of Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 23.8% -23.8% 42.4% 24.0% 168.8 50,836Golden State Water Company San Dimas South Coast 26% 0% Yes 23.9% -23.9% 38.4% 22.1% 131.8 54,872Riverside Highland Water Company South Coast 33% 0% Yes 23.9% -23.9% 39.7% 22.3% 209.4 15,481California Water Service Company Bear Gulch San Francisco Bay 36% 2% Yes 26.0% -24.0% 38.6% 24.6% 190.6 68,829Thousand Oaks City of South Coast 26% 0% Yes 24.1% -24.1% 34.9% 22.4% 133.8 51,609

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 11: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 11 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

California Water Service Company Marysville Sacramento River 21% 0% Yes 24.1% -24.1% 32.8% 23.7% 129.0 12,555Suisun-Solano Water Authority San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 24.2% -24.2% 30.2% 24.8% 83.6 29,510California-American Water Ventura District South Coast 30% 0% Yes 24.3% -24.3% 30.8% 24.7% 145.8 63,423Golden State Water Company Simi Valley South Coast 22% 0% Yes 24.3% -24.3% 40.3% 21.9% 110.8 43,351Grover Beach City of Central Coast 8% 8% No 32.3% -24.3% 36.2% 28.7% 80.5 13,156Santa Margarita Water District South Coast 23% 0% Yes 24.4% -24.4% 35.1% 26.6% 98.5 158,806Valencia Water Company South Coast 21% 0% Yes 24.4% -24.4% 40.4% 22.2% 154.4 97,300Perris, City of South Coast 24% 4% Yes 28.5% -24.5% 32.7% 29.1% 89.1 9,000Carmichael Water District Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 24.5% -24.5% 38.9% 24.0% 280.2 37,897Manteca City of San Joaquin River 27% 0% Yes 24.5% -24.5% 30.8% 20.5% 157.9 76,797Sacramento Suburban Water District Sacramento River 29% 0% Yes 24.5% -24.5% 42.7% 30.1% 162.5 176,106Linda County Water District Sacramento River 29% 0% Yes 24.6% -24.6% 42.0% 24.8% 194.9 18,808Hayward City of San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 24.7% -24.7% 28.7% 31.2% 30.1 158,985Santa Fe Springs City of South Coast 16% 0% Yes 25.0% -25.0% 28.6% 27.4% 73.6 18,199Arcadia City of South Coast 34% 0% Yes 25.0% -25.0% 30.9% 22.9% 160.6 57,639Fruitridge Vista Water Company Sacramento River 28% 0% Yes 25.1% -25.1% 39.7% 25.9% 204.6 21,441California Water Service Company Los Altos/Suburban San Francisco Bay 32% 0% Yes 25.1% -25.1% 38.7% 24.1% 150.0 69,874Rio Linda - Elverta Community Water District Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 25.2% -25.2% 41.8% 28.1% 281.0 11,013Livermore City of Division of Water Resources San Francisco Bay 17% 0% Yes 25.3% -25.3% 42.1% 25.9% 132.4 28,782Burbank City of South Coast 22% 0% Yes 25.4% -25.4% 28.9% 23.2% 101.1 105,110El Toro Water District South Coast 24% 0% Yes 25.4% -25.4% 28.9% 24.3% 111.9 48,628California Water Service Company Salinas District Central Coast 16% 0% Yes 25.5% -25.5% 28.9% 25.4% 69.0 122,030Citrus Heights Water District Sacramento River 29% 0% Yes 25.5% -25.5% 42.4% 25.0% 237.0 65,093Gilroy City of Central Coast 24% 0% Yes 25.5% -25.5% 35.2% 23.3% 104.1 55,398Sunnyslope County Water District Central Coast 26% 0% Yes 25.6% -25.6% 42.2% 27.7% 122.3 19,837Fresno City of Tulare Lake 25% 0% Yes 25.6% -25.6% 31.4% 22.4% 190.1 520,453Antioch City of San Joaquin River 27% 0% Yes 25.6% -25.6% 37.5% 25.4% 100.1 112,968San Clemente City of South Coast 24% 0% Yes 25.7% -25.7% 30.7% 22.8% 95.6 51,385Vacaville City of Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 26.1% -26.1% 38.6% 24.9% 157.0 90,194Coachella Valley Water District Colorado River 32% 0% Yes 26.1% -26.1% 40.6% 28.6% 223.0 318,217

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 12: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 12 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

San Jose Water Company San Francisco Bay 20% 2% Yes 28.2% -26.2% 38.4% 28.5% 87.3 990,000South Pasadena City of South Coast 26% 0% Yes 26.3% -26.3% 32.0% 24.8% 97.8 26,174Sacramento City of Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 26.5% -26.5% 35.0% 25.1% 156.5 485,683Golden State Water Company S Arcadia South Coast 22% 0% Yes 26.6% -26.6% 31.6% 24.5% 95.8 26,827Orange Vale Water Company Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 26.7% -26.7% 42.6% 26.6% 288.5 16,747Groveland Community Services District San Joaquin River 21% 0% Yes 26.7% -26.7% 31.7% 25.5% 148.7 3,400Alameda County Water District San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 26.7% -26.7% 36.2% 24.8% 86.2 349,000California Water Service Company Bakersfield Tulare Lake 29% 0% Yes 26.7% -26.7% 38.9% 31.8% 194.2 279,393South Coast Water District South Coast 24% 0% Yes 27.0% -27.0% 33.0% 24.6% 106.4 35,004San Bernardino County Service Area 64 South Lahontan 28% 0% Yes 27.0% -27.0% 36.3% 26.7% 154.8 14,104Carpinteria Valley Water District Central Coast 20% 0% Yes 27.1% -27.1% 37.6% 32.9% 93.9 14,616Quartz Hill Water District South Lahontan 32% 0% Yes 27.1% -27.1% 43.6% 16.3% 309.6 20,352California Water Service Company Westlake South Coast 34% 0% Yes 27.3% -27.3% 38.2% 27.0% 273.9 19,456San Jose City of San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 27.4% -27.4% 35.5% 29.3% 103.3 113,700Desert Water Agency Colorado River 32% 0% Yes 27.5% -27.5% 29.8% 21.8% 209.9 105,680Tahoe City Public Utilities District North Lahontan 17% 0% Yes 27.5% -27.5% 33.2% 20.4% 93.8 15,888Golden State Water Company Barstow South Lahontan 20% 0% Yes 27.6% -27.6% 36.7% 29.6% 107.7 31,209Kingsburg, City of Tulare Lake 34% 0% Yes 27.6% -27.6% 38.6% 24.1% 310.0 11,685Poway City of South Coast 24% 0% Yes 27.7% -27.7% 43.3% 23.5% 171.1 48,774Mountain View City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 27.7% -27.7% 30.7% 28.3% 73.8 76,448East Valley Water District South Coast 22% 0% Yes 28.3% -28.3% 35.2% 25.3% 153.6 104,457Galt City of Sacramento River 29% 0% Yes 28.3% -28.3% 38.0% 26.5% 202.0 24,289Oakdale City of San Joaquin River 30% 0% Yes 28.3% -28.3% 43.3% 24.2% 222.5 21,442Corcoran, City of Tulare Lake 32% 0% Yes 28.3% -28.3% 35.8% 28.9% 225.1 24,154Alhambra City of South Coast 22% 0% Yes 28.4% -28.4% 28.5% 30.4% 85.5 85,068

California-American Water Company Sacramento District Sacramento River 17% 0% Yes 28.5% -28.5% 44.9% 28.5% 131.4 203,851American Canyon, City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 28.6% -28.6% 26.6% 29.8% 78.2 20,315California Water Service Company Oroville Sacramento River 25% 0% Yes 28.7% -28.7% 32.1% 28.6% 135.5 10,858Golden State Water Company Orcutt Central Coast 31% 0% Yes 28.8% -28.8% 41.8% 28.8% 171.2 31,872Great Oaks Water Company Incorporated San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 28.9% -28.9% 36.1% 31.4% 79.6 100,523

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 13: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 13 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Burlingame City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 29.0% -29.0% 34.6% 26.6% 64.4 31,109Lee Lake Water District South Coast 31% 0% Yes 29.1% -29.1% 30.4% 26.8% 141.4 15,543California Water Service Company King City Central Coast 9% 0% Yes 29.1% -29.1% 27.0% 35.4% 45.3 15,087Woodland City of Sacramento River 20% 0% Yes 29.4% -29.4% 44.8% 32.0% 119.4 57,223Brentwood City of San Joaquin River 28% 0% Yes 29.5% -29.5% 44.6% 28.6% 143.8 58,784Triunfo Sanitation District / Oak Park Water Service South Coast 30% 0% Yes 29.5% -29.5% 35.9% 24.5% 157.4 12,200Ripon City of San Joaquin River 33% 0% Yes 29.5% -29.5% 30.8% 29.0% 234.5 14,915San Jacinto City of South Coast 30% 0% Yes 29.8% -29.8% 39.0% 24.7% 116.1 17,961Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company South Lahontan 24% 0% Yes 29.9% -29.9% 36.4% 27.7% 129.0 62,602East Orange County Water District South Coast 29% 0% Yes 30.1% -30.1% 40.3% 25.9% 244.2 3,257Yorba Linda Water District South Coast 28% 0% Yes 30.2% -30.2% 43.4% 27.3% 169.1 78,539Golden State Water Company Claremont South Coast 30% 0% Yes 30.2% -30.2% 48.0% 27.8% 177.8 37,160Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District South Coast 24% 0% Yes 30.4% -30.4% 36.6% 33.6% 127.9 29,955California Water Service Company Dixon, City of Sacramento River 24% 0% Yes 30.5% -30.5% 36.7% 30.6% 118.4 10,020Escondido City of South Coast 12% 0% Yes 30.6% -30.6% 40.1% 27.7% 92.4 137,941California Water Service Company Livermore San Francisco Bay 21% 0% Yes 30.8% -30.8% 46.3% 28.8% 133.5 58,918Pleasanton City of San Francisco Bay 24% 0% Yes 30.9% -30.9% 46.8% 29.0% 136.0 74,850Hillsborough Town of San Francisco Bay 36% 0% Yes 31.1% -31.1% 42.6% 28.5% 295.9 10,850Westborough Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 31.6% -31.6% 48.0% 39.5% 37.5 14,050Contra Costa Water District San Francisco Bay 25% 0% Yes 31.9% -31.9% 39.7% 26.7% 119.8 199,680Brawley City of Colorado River 24% 0% Yes 32.0% -32.0% 37.7% 29.9% 162.3 27,743Valley Center Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 0% Yes 32.0% -32.0% 48.1% 22.3% 240.1 25,608Dinuba City of Tulare Lake 29% 0% Yes 32.5% -32.5% 38.9% 31.7% 137.3 24,657Dublin San Ramon Services District San Francisco Bay 12% 0% Yes 32.5% -32.5% 44.6% 32.5% 66.8 82,287California Water Service Company Redwood Valley North Coast 16% 0% Yes 32.7% -32.7% 39.7% 33.8% 95.5 3,206California Water Service Company Chico District Sacramento River 29% 0% Yes 33.3% -33.3% 44.3% 32.9% 174.7 104,375San Gabriel Valley Water Company South Coast 14% 0% Yes 33.4% -33.4% 39.6% 32.1% 73.1 271,817Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company Colorado River 32% 0% Yes 33.6% -33.6% 37.1% 37.0% 270.8 8,948California Water Service Company Willows Sacramento River 26% 0% Yes 33.8% -33.8% 38.0% 33.1% 147.3 7,114North Coast County Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 0% Yes 36.8% -36.8% 39.3% 44.1% 47.3 39,000

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.

Page 14: July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard … · 2016. 9. 6. · July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %) 398 suppliers reporting; non-filers

July 2016 Supplier Conservation Compliance (by missed standard %)398 suppliers reporting; non-filers on page 14

Data pulled August 22, 2016

Page 14 of 14

Supplier Name Hydrologic Region

Previous (3/1/2016)

Current (Effective 6/1/2016)

July 2015

July 2016

State-mandatedConservation

StandardTotal

PopulationServed

EstimatedJuly 2016 Monthly R-GPCD

Monthly Savings(as compared to

2013)

Applicable Cumulative Savings

Achieved by Supplier*

(as compared to 2013)

Missed Conservation Standard By

Did Supplier

Self-certify?

Merced City of San Joaquin River 34% 0% Yes 37.0% -37.0% 44.3% 37.1% 209.7 83,400Paradise Irrigation District Sacramento River 33% 0% Yes 37.5% -37.5% 46.8% 36.6% 190.6 26,032Benicia City of San Francisco Bay 20% 0% Yes 38.1% -38.1% 36.8% 37.1% 86.7 28,086California Water Service Company Selma Tulare Lake 30% 0% Yes 38.6% -38.6% 43.2% 38.8% 166.1 25,177Patterson City of San Joaquin River 25% 0% Yes 38.8% -38.8% 36.8% 44.8% 108.7 21,094Del Oro Water Company Sacramento River 21% 0% Yes 40.8% -40.8% 35.8% 35.9% 82.1 9,546Menlo Park City of San Francisco Bay 16% 0% Yes 45.8% -45.8% 46.3% 50.3% 83.5 16,066California Water Service Company Antelope Valley South Lahontan 32% 0% Yes 45.9% -45.9% 45.9% 38.5% 198.3 3,401

Reclassified as small and removed from list of urban water suppliers:

Golden State Water Company Cowan Heights Winton Water & Sanitary District

July 2016 Non-filers

The following suppliers did not submit July 2016 data by August 22, 2016:

Calexico City of Lynwood City of South Feather Water and Power Agency

Cambria Community Services District Milpitas City of Ukiah City of

Compton City of Porterville City of

Lemoore City of Rainbow Municipal Water District

June 2016 Non-filers

The following suppliers did not submit June 2016 data by August 22, 2016:

Cambria Community Services District South Feather Water and Power Agency

* Applicable Cumulative Savings Achieved by Supplier is used to assess compliance with conservation standard: cumulative savings for suppliers that did not self-certify are from June 2015 through July 2016; for suppliers that self-certified, cumulative savings are calculated from June 2016 through July 2016.