june 2, 2009

50
1 June 2, 2009 D.P. Weygand Vector Mesons in the Nuclear Medium and the CLAS Collaboration D.P. Weygand R. Nasseripour, M. H. Wood, C. Djalali R. Nasseripour et al. Jul 2007.Phys.Rev.Lett.99:262302,2007. M.H. Wood, et al., Phys.Rev.C78:015201,2008.

Upload: chyna

Post on 05-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Vector Mesons in the Nuclear Medium. D.P. Weygand R. Nasseripour, M. H. Wood, C. Djalali. and the CLAS Collaboration. R. Nasseripour et al. Jul 2007. Phys.Rev.Lett.99:262302,2007. M.H. Wood, et al., Phys.Rev.C78:015201,2008. D.P. Weygand. June 2, 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: June 2, 2009

1June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Vector Mesons in the Nuclear Medium

and the CLAS Collaboration

D.P. WeygandR. Nasseripour, M. H. Wood, C. Djalali

R. Nasseripour et al. Jul 2007.Phys.Rev.Lett.99:262302,2007.

M.H. Wood, et al., Phys.Rev.C78:015201,2008.

Page 2: June 2, 2009

2June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

At this time please turn off all cell phones

and other electronic equipment

Page 3: June 2, 2009

3June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

The Nature of Mass

The spontaneous breaking of Chiral Symmetry in vacuum is the origin of ~2% of the mass of hadrons

Changes of properties of hadrons in the nuclear medium may signal: -Chiral symmetry restoration -exotic state of matter,….As

chiral symmetry is restored.and as a consequence,

masses, coupling constants, widths of hadrons may change.

98% of mass is generated dynamically

Page 4: June 2, 2009

4June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand33

Scale invariance in effective Lagrangian: mV*

mV

=mN

*

mN

=fπ*

fπ≈0.8 at ρ0G.E. Brown and M Rho, Phys. Rev Lett.

66 (1991) 2720

QCD sum rules: T. Hatsuda and S. Lee Phys. Rev. C46 (1992) R34

α ≈0.16±0.06mV

*

mV

=1−αρBρ0

Many body effects:

B Friman, H.J. Pirner, Nucl Phys. A617 (1997) 496 R. Rapp, G. Chanfray, J Wambach, Nucl Phys. A617 (1997) 472

Model Predictions of Vector Meson Properties In Medium

Page 5: June 2, 2009

5June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand44

Vector mesons ρ: M=768 MeV Γ= 149 MeV cτ~1.3 fm JP=1- ω: M=782 MeV Γ= 8 MeV cτ~23.4 fm

φ: M=1020 MeV Γ= 4 MeV cτ~44.4 fm

The predicted medium modifications are so large that even at normal nuclear density, they can be observed, so:•Vector mesons can be produced in nuclei with probes that leave the nucleus in almost an equilibrium state γπp• probe+ A --> V X --> e+e- X ( no FSI)

Medium modification of vector mesons properties in nuclei

Page 6: June 2, 2009

6June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 7: June 2, 2009

7June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand55

“the fit … reproduces the data qualitatively well”

M. Naruki et al, PRL 96 (2006) 092301

Subtract the background and constrain the ωρ ratio to include ρ Using a model that predicts the probability for ρ mesons decaying inside the nucleus.

α = 0.092 +/- 0.002

KEK-PS E325 (ρω) p+A ρω,φ+X (ρωφ e+e-)

Page 8: June 2, 2009

8June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand66

mass shift for low recoil momenta φ in Cu

R.Muto et al., PRL 98 (2007) 042501

m*/m = 1 – m*/m = 1 – kk11 ρρρρ

ΓΓ*/*/ΓΓ = 1 + = 1 + kk22 ρρ//ρρ00

Best Fit ValuesBest Fit Values

ρωρω φφ

k1 9.2 ± 0.2% 3.4+0.6-0.7%

k2 0 (fixed) 2.6+1.8-1.2

KEK-PS E325φ

Page 9: June 2, 2009

9June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

TAPS: CB-ELSA

Page 10: June 2, 2009

10June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ExperimentExperiment ReactionsReactions ResultsResults

TAGXTAGX γγ++33He-->He-->ρρ+X (+X (ρρ->->ππππ−−)) full BR, full BR, αα~ 0.06~ 0.06KEKKEK p+A->p+A->ρωρω,,φφ+X (+X (ρωρω->e->e++ee−−)) αα= 0.092±0.002= 0.092±0.002

KEKKEK p+A->p+A->φφ+X (+X (φφ->e->e++ee−−)) αα~ 0.04~ 0.04SPring-8SPring-8 γγ+ A-->+ A-->φφ+A*(+A*(φφ--> K--> K++KK−−)) no effectno effect

TAPS TAPS γγ+A-->+A-->ωωX (X (ωω --> --> ππ00 γγα∼α∼0.13-0150.13-015JLab-g7aJLab-g7a γγ+A-->(+A-->(ρωφρωφA* (VM-->eA* (VM-->e++ee--)) αα0.02±0.020.02±0.02JPARCJPARC p+A->p+A->ρωρω,,φφ+X (+X (ρωφρωφ->e->e++ee−−) ) proposal #16proposal #16

HADESHADES p+p,d->p+p,d->ρωρω,,φφ+X (+X (ρωφρωφ->e->e++ee−−) ) (running)(running)

-Only g7 with EM interaction in entrance and exit channels-Only g7 with EM interaction in entrance and exit channels-TAGX, Spring8 and TAPS have hadronic FSI. -TAGX, Spring8 and TAPS have hadronic FSI.

Page 11: June 2, 2009

11June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

CBA

south linacnorth linac

injector

Page 12: June 2, 2009

12June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Particle Detection In CLAS

Page 13: June 2, 2009

13June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Segmented TargetFoils of Carbon, Iron, Titanium, and LeadLD2 (LH2) as control

Page 14: June 2, 2009

14June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Excellent π/e Rejection

ω

φρbkgd

ee++ee-- Invariant Mass Spectra Invariant Mass Spectra

e+

e-

p

Excellent π/e discrimination: 5.4x10 -4 for one and 2.9x10-7 for two arms.

Page 15: June 2, 2009

15June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Correlated: Monte-Carlo simulations using a Monte-Carlo simulations using a model (BUU) by Mosel et al. model (BUU) by Mosel et al. ((Nucl. Phys. A671, 503 ) Nucl. Phys. A671, 503 ) including various decay including various decay channels and nuclear effects, channels and nuclear effects, and CLAS detector simulation and CLAS detector simulation package (GSIM) Simulations with package (GSIM) Simulations with BUU includes all the e+e- decay BUU includes all the e+e- decay channels with same strength.channels with same strength.

Uncorrelated: Mixed event technique. Pairs of identical (e+e+, e-e-) leptons, which Mixed event technique. Pairs of identical (e+e+, e-e-) leptons, which are produced only by combinatorial background provide a natural are produced only by combinatorial background provide a natural normalization and samples of uncorrelated particles.normalization and samples of uncorrelated particles.

Semi-correlated”:Bethe-Heitler Bethe-Heitler calculated by Mosel’s calculated by Mosel’s group group negligible negligibleγΑγΑ ππππ X X γγ e+e- e+e- γγ e+e- e+e- 2 2 ππ00 Dalitz decay mixed Dalitz decay mixed negligiblenegligibleππ e+e- e+e- e+e- e+e- double Dalitz double Dalitz low masslow mass

Backgrounds

Page 16: June 2, 2009

16June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Uncorrelated Background

Page 17: June 2, 2009

17June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ω

φρ

e+ e- Spectra:Background Subtracted Fit Results

Page 18: June 2, 2009

18June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Ratio A/2H: Varying pole mass

Page 19: June 2, 2009

19June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Ratio A/2H: Varying pole mass

Page 20: June 2, 2009

20June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Ratio A/2H: Varying width

Page 21: June 2, 2009

21June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Ratio A/2H: Varying width

Page 22: June 2, 2009

22June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 23: June 2, 2009

23June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

C Fe

e+e- Invariant Mass (GeV)

D2

C/D2 Fe/D2

Page 24: June 2, 2009

24June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

TargetMass (MeV)

Width (MeV)

Mass Giessen

BUU

WidthGiessenBUU

2H770.3 +/-

3.2185.2 +/-

8.6- -

C762.5 /-

3.7176.4 +/-

9.5773.8 +/- .9

177.6 +/- 2.1

Fe779.0 +/-

5.7217.7 +/-

14.5773.8 +/-

5.4202.5 +/-

11.6

Summary on the ρ meson

Page 25: June 2, 2009

25June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand2121

Summary on the ρ meson

• PRL published – R. Nasseripour et al., PRL 99 (2007) 262302• PRC submitted February 2008. M. Wood et al., arXiv:0803.0492v1 [nucl-ex]

Our result (α =0.02 ± 0.02) is consistent with no mass shift

Result does not confirm the KEK results (α ~0.09).

Rule out ΔM à la Brown/Rho ( 20%) and Hatsuda/Lee (α ~0.16)

width reproduced by GiBUU

momentum of ρ limited between 0.8 and 2 GeV

Page 26: June 2, 2009

26June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ρ−ωInterference ρω

Page 27: June 2, 2009

27June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 28: June 2, 2009

28June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 29: June 2, 2009

29June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ρ−ωInterference

Page 30: June 2, 2009

30June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

WARNING! The following is EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY- DO NOT QUOTE!!

Page 31: June 2, 2009

31June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 32: June 2, 2009

32June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Kaon Identification by Energy Loss

KaonsNot Kaons

Page 33: June 2, 2009

33June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 34: June 2, 2009

34June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 35: June 2, 2009

35June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 36: June 2, 2009

36June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 37: June 2, 2009

37June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Ratio of K+ K- invariant mass to H2

Page 38: June 2, 2009

38June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Ratio of K+ K- invariant mass to H2

Page 39: June 2, 2009

39June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand2929

CLAS was an excellent tool for these studies:

e+e- from rare leptonic decay of light vector mesons are identified.• Clear ρ, ωand φsignals in the invariant mass spectrum. “Mixed-event” technique gives both shape and normalization of the combinatorial background. The ρ meson ( Final): Correct mass shape is extracted. No mass shift and width increased by 40% in Fe ( as predicted by GiBUU)

KK sprectrum being studied for Φ meson Next at Jlab by g7 group:

High Statistics measurement of e+e- production on H2 g12 70 pb-1

Conditionally approved g7b high statistics data on LD2, C, Fe, Nb and Sn

Summary and Conclusions (Medium Modifications)

Page 40: June 2, 2009

40June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

The End

Page 41: June 2, 2009

41June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Extra Slides

Page 42: June 2, 2009

42June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Page 43: June 2, 2009

43June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Systematics

Page 44: June 2, 2009

44June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ωφ Absorption

Page 45: June 2, 2009

45June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ω absorptionThe in-medium width is Γ=Γ0+Γcoll where Γcoll = γρvσ*

VN

Kaskulov, Hernandez & Oset EPJ A 31 (2007) 245P. Mühlich and U. Mosel NPA 773 (2006) 156

JLab preliminary

Taps

Normalized to carbon

Page 46: June 2, 2009

46June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

ω AbsorptionThe in-medium width is Γ=Γ0+Γcoll where Γcoll = γρvσ*

VN

Kaskulov, Hernandez & Oset EPJ A 31 (2007) 245P. Mühlich and U. Mosel NPA 773 (2006) 156

JLab preliminary

Normalized to carbonNormalized to carbonTaps

JLab preliminary

Taps

Access to the cross sectionTA=σA/AσN

Page 47: June 2, 2009

47June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

φ Absorption

2424

JLab (preliminary)

Spring8 T. Ishikawa et al. Phys. Lett. B 608, 215 (2005)

Giessen calculations

Giessen calculationsw/ Spring8 absorptionstrengths

Proposed JLab data

Normalized to carbon

Spring8 γ A φ A’ K+K- A’ (Eγ=1.5-2.4 GeV)

Large statistical error bars.

preliminar

y

Text

Page 48: June 2, 2009

48June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

e+e- (mixed)e+e+(same)e-e- (same)

Page 49: June 2, 2009

49June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

χ/DOF=1.1

χ/DOF=3.9

Page 50: June 2, 2009

50June 2, 2009D.P. Weygand

Systematic errors on α