june 2014 consolidated report on training for judges ... · the training activity for district...

1

June 2014

By

Dr. Khurshid & Zeb

Consolidated Report on

Training for Judges & Lawyers through Law & Justice

Commission Pakistan

3

Contents

1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 4

2. Background .......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3. Introduction ......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4. Proceedings ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Evaluations ............................................................................................................................... 10

5. Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 19

6.1 Pre Evaluation & Post Evaluation (Closed Ended Questions) ............................................ 19

6.2 Over all training Evaluation ............................................................................................ 20

6.3 Comparative Statistical Statement of Pre & Post Training Evaluation .............................. 21

6.4 Consolidated Resource Person Evaluation by Trainees ..................................................... 22

Annexure .................................................................................................................................. 23

Schedule of Activities ............................................................................................................... 24

List of participants .................................................................................................................... 28

Post training Feedback Form ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Group Photo ............................................................................................................................. 46

4

1. Executive Summary

The Law & Justice Commission of Pakistan (LJCP) devised a series of training programs on

appraisal of evidence & procedure of trials for Judges and Lawyers. It was funded by Access

to Justice Development Fund (AJDF). Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Judicial Academy (KPJA) was the

implementing partner, which conducted these training in the Province of Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa. The target districts were Peshawar, Swat, Chitral, Bannu, D.I Khan and

Abbottabad. The key areas were Professional ethics, Proceedings in Civil Cases, Evidence to

substantiate case, Adjournments, Sharia Nizam-e-Adl Regulation (Impact study), Summoning

of witnesses u/s 540 CrPc, significance of Forensic evidence, Pre trial proceedings and Trial

in criminal cases. The trainees were Civil Judges cum judicial Magistrates and lawyers

posted in their respective divisions. The ratio between Civil Judges cum Judicial Magistrates

and Lawyers was one to three. The District and Sessions Judges in consultation with the

Presidents of Bar Association nominated the lawyers for the trainings of their Districts.

The training activity for District Chitral was conducted on 9 & 10th at D.I. Khan, on 11 & 12th

at Bannu, on 13 & 14th, at Swat on 16 & 17th, at Abbottabad on 18 & 19th and at Peshawar

on 20th and 21st June 2014 respectively. It was attended by a considerable number of

participants.

The Resource Persons were mostly Judicial Officers except for Dr. Adnan Khan, Director

Research & Publication KPJA. The Resource Persons included Mr. Azim Khan Afridi, DSJ

Haripur, Mr. Sharif Ahmad Khan, DSJ, Swat, Mr. Adil Khan, DSJ Charrasadda, Mr. Shaber

Khan, DSJ Peshawar, Mr. Rauf Khan, DSJ D.I. Khan, Mr. Shahid Khan DSJ Abbottabad, Mr.

Inam Ullah Khan DSJ Tank, Syed Zamrod Shah, DSJ Bannu, DR. Khurshid Iqbal, Dean, Qazi

Ataullah, and Ms. javeria Sartaj, Director Instructions KPJA.

The course contents were of practical impart to the participants and the method of

instructions was interactive and participatory.

5

2. Dean's Note

This two-day training was a unique exercise for this Academy. It was conducted on

the advice of Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, which had designed the

curriculum, selected the number, categories and ratio of the participants (total 100

with 2/3rd lawyers and 1/3rd judges) and the districts of their residences. Very little

was left to this Academy! The Academy is grateful to the LJCP for affording it this

opportunity. I can’t help appreciate the efforts of the LJCP for showing a concern for

training of judges and lawyers and advising this Academy to conduct this training.

For a purely academic purpose and with no malice at all, I take this opportunity to

highlight some key challenges that the Academy faced in organizing this training.

Moreover, a discussion on challenges may prove helpful in any future exercise of

similar nature for this Academy as well as the LJCP. Furthermore, we at this Academy

believe that we learn from our problems and shortcomings.

Two aspects appeared to be challenging. First, the proposed 100 participants for one

course appeared problematic. While the seating space was also a problem, what was

found much more difficult was an effective communication of a resource person

with such a large number of participants. The standard strength of a class we

maintain is 25 participants. This is also with a view to ensure sufficient interaction

between the resource person and the participants. In order to ensure effectiveness

of communication and sufficient interaction, the participants were divided into two

groups. The division helped, though in a limited way, to improve effectiveness of

communication, including interaction, particularly during a question-answer session.

It was not mere a logistical issue, but one that goes to the core of the concept of

training as a branch of adult education. One may appreciate that training is a kind of

6

adult education (Merrian and Ralph; 2007), seeking to bring about changes in

knowledge, attitudes, values or skills (Darkenwald and Merrian; 1982). Training of

professionals, like judges and lawyers, is a kind of adult education of collegial nature

(Oxner; 2003), relating to job description and requires ‘a separate body of

knowledge, inquiry, research and practice’ (Armytage; 1993). Emanating from

capacity building, judicial training has far reaching implications in wider perspectives,

such as, the rule of law, development and human rights (Armytage; 2003; Iqbal;

2014).

Second, the curriculum though was well designed, but the main points of some

topics seem to be wide and diverse. For example, the topic: “Trial in Criminal Cases”

was proposed to comprise of framing of charge, the when and how aspects of

evidence of prosecution and defence and recording of statement under section 342

Cr.P.C. Each of these sub-topics is so comprehensive that justice could not be done

to a single one in a two-hour lecture. Same could be said about other topics, for

instance, pretrial proceedings and evidence to substantiate case. On balance,

however, topics like importance of expert evidence and disposal of petty nature

criminal cases could be covered in given time.

Despite these two challenges, the Academy has made every effort to best to make

this training a successful exercise. We have a pre-and post-training evaluation

system that works online. A range of questions are asked from the participants on

the commencing day. Almost the same questions are again asked from the

participants on the concluding. This helps us explore the pre-training level and the

needs, including expectations of the participants. In this way, we are able to measure

the success of our course. Given the high number of participants, a good number of

7

pre-and post-evaluation forms were to be got filled by participants manually. This

manual exercise was difficult to be rigorously monitored. As a result, we could not

receive those forms filled each and every participant. Moreover, from lawyers, the

exact number of participants did not attend the training. Total number of

participants was 346 (252 lawyers and 112 judges). Due to high number of

participants, those registered themselves were 222; the record of 124 is not

available. The pre-and post-evaluation is 69 %. Hence, 69 % evaluation data could be

analyzed. The analyses indicate appreciable improvement in the knowledge and

expertise of the participants.

8

Synopses of

Lectures

9

How to Address Adjournments and Stay Matters By

Sofia Waqar Khattak

Introduction

Law relating to adjournment and Stay matter as embodied in Order XXXIX and XVII CPC is

considered purely a discretionary relief. Order XVII as originally enacted consisted of three

rules only.Two more rules were added by Ordinance XII of 1972. Rule 1 gives powers to

court to adjourn if sufficient cause is shown. Succeeding two rules apply to adjourned dates

of hearing in suit. To this extent there is similarity between Order IX and Order XVII .Order

IX provides for consequences of all or any party to suit on the day of hearing. Rule 2 states

that where on adjourned date of hearing court may proceed to dispose off the suit in any of

the modes provided under order IX. Rule 3 confers powers to decide forthwith if party to

suit fails to produce evidence inspite of having been given time. Decision may be the same

day or on any other day, but it should be on merits. Temporary injunctions is a form of

equitable relief and are to be issued in aid of equity and justice. Principle of grant or refusal

is regulated by provision of section 53, Specific Relief Act and Order XXXIX rule 1 and 2 of

CPC.

Learning Objectives

An orientation of the basic concept of adjournment and stay matters

To develop understanding how to address these matters in court of Law

Significance of adjournment and stay during proceeding

To sensitize participants about misuse of Law to prolong litigation

Methodology

Main thrust of lecture was to make it more interactive and participatory by involving all the

participants. Relevant Provisions of Specific Relief Act also discussed with specific reference

to pragmatic approach of matter. Adjournment has become menace as this provision is

being misused rather abused for ulterior motives of parties having week case. It was

suggested by the participants that courts need to be more assertive and Bar to strictly

10

adhere to professional ethics and code of conduct. Similarly while dealing with stay matters

courts should avoid summary disposal of application. While issuing stay order vague and

general terminology should be avoided so as to avoid any interpretation other than

intended by the court.

Learning Outcomes

To develop understanding what actually the intention of lawmakers was while

inserting provision relating adjournment

To sensitize participants about misuse of Law

Capacity building by gaining command on law and procedure to tackle with apparent

frivolous application for adjournment

Temporary injunction should not become hurdle in expeditious disposal of suit

Suggested Readings

The code of Civil procedure 1908

The Specific Relief Act 1877

Law of Injunctions by Abid Minhas

Pre Trial Proceedings (Criminal)

By

Syed Yahya Zahid Gilani

Introduction:

The lecture encompasses the area of ‘Cognizable Criminal Litigation’ with the specific focus

on the ‘Pre-Trial Stage, viz the registration of ‘First information Report’ (FIR), ‘Investigation’

and submission of ‘Final Report’ (Challan) for Trial of the case in Court, covering the

procedural law contained in S. 4 (f), Chapter V: S.46, Chapter XIV: S.154 to 173, Chapter

XXIV: S.344 and Chapter XXXIX: S.496-497 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, pertaining to

inception of cognizable criminal case, arrest of the accused, physical entrustment of custody

of accused to police for his interrogation, bail matters, whole process of investigation,

11

judicial confinement, time to time adjournments for completion of investigation and

submission of final report for commencement of court trial.

The fundamental objectives of the lecture, in this prospective, are:

Orientation of the Criminal Law relating to ‘Pre Trial Proceedings’.

Correct understanding of the Law on the subject vis-a-vis its aims of effective judicial

supervision over the investigation process.

Detection of causes of the acute problem of delays in investigation.

Sensitization of the dilemma of unnecessary delays amounting to denial of justice

and motivation for gripping the challenge to eliminate the distress within the existing

legal frame work.

Coordination of judicial Magistrates and Advocates in effective implementation of

relevant instructions of High Court and NJPMC (National Judicial Policy Making

Committee).

This lecture will be a training program for the Judicial Magistrates and Lawyers working at

District Judiciary level who directly concern with the ‘Pre Trial Proceedings’ of the Criminal

Cases.

Methodology:

The lecture starts with light motivating inception to comprehend the audience that their

vision and leadership qualities, augmented by strong will to work, would lead to explore

means and evolve better planning to successfully eradicate core and key issues in shortest

time. The lecture is descriptive, analytical and critical in the sense that it studies the relevant

law mentioned above, and analyzes it, besides its critical survey to discover the causes of

existing hardships and hurdles in its strict implementation. The lecture specifically has direct

micro focusing on the problem of non submission of final report for trial of the case within

14 days that the law codified in S. 173 Cr.P.C. zealously require. The lecture educates about

the practical strategy devised by the speaker with the name of “PTP-Plan” (Pre Trial Pursuit-

Plan) to combat the problem of unnecessary delay in submission of final reports (Challans)

when he was working as District and Session judge at Mardan, in the year 2006-2007. The

PTP-Plan was successfully utilized and the six months achievements report (from 1st January

to 30th June of year 2007) is attached and donated to “Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Judicial

12

Academy” for its library and also to float on its website for utilization of the participants of

the course and all others, interested. This tool of the lecture would sensitize the participants

that the delays in investigation of criminal cases are curable with attention and hot pursuit,

after establishment of articulate data base.

Learning Outcomes:

After attentively attending the lecture, the participant will be expected:

To have refreshed the apt vision of legal provisions pertaining to Criminal Pre Trail

Proceedings.

To have sensitized about core problem of ‘Delays in Submission of Challan’, (final

report for trial) within 14 days, as commanded in law.

To have motivated to curb delays in Pre Trial Proceedings.

Reading List:

(i) Criminal Procedure code 1898:-

Chapter XIV: S.154 to S.173.

Chapter 5: S.46

Chapter XXIV: S.334.

Chapter XXXIX: S.496-497.

(ii) Instructions of Honorable High Court and National Judicial Policy Making Committee

(NJPMC).

a. PHC letter No: 14124-14149/Admin dated Peshawar 30th September 2008.

b. PHC letter No:1230-1253/Admn, dated Peshawar 2nd February 2009.

c. PHC letter No: 2628/Admn. Brh. Dated Peshawar 10th May, 1993.

d. PHC letter No:5374-5395, dated Peshawar 23rd July, 1998.

e. PHC letter No:3011-32 dated Peshawar; 19.04.2000.

f. PHC letter No: 876-99 MIT, dated: 21st May 2004. (Containing: CHIEF JUSTICE

DIRECTIVE NO. 22)

g. PHC, Registrar Letter No.5437-57/ Admin, Dated 13th April, 2012.

13

Further Readings

Leading relevant Published Papers recommended for study for capacity building:-

1:- “Hardships of litigants and miscarriage of Justice caused by Delays and Courts”. (PLD-

1991-Journal-Page 103).

2:-“Speedy Justice, How?”(PLD-1998-Journal-Page-228).

Summoning of Witnesses U/S 540 CrPC and Significance of Forensic Evidence

By

Qazi Ataullah

Introduction

At the first instance, the lecture discovers the justification of incorporating Section 540 in

the last chapter “Miscellaneous” of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As a second attempt, it

introduces Forensic Evidence with special focus on its evidentiary value.

For Section 540 is not a part of regular trial procedure, the lecture deals it in juxtaposition to

summoning of witnesses u/ss. 244 and 265(f) of the Code. It explores that the later sections

carries the principles of Common Law and as such provide equal opportunity of audience to

Prosecution and Defense. Section 540, on the other hand, has been laid down on the

principles of Equity that ensures the dispensation of justice on the basis of truth; a keynote

for arriving to the just conclusion of the case. Besides, the lecture digs out the philosophy of

seven time repetition of word “any” in a small provision of five lines.

Forensic Evidence is the second concern of the activity. The lecture draws a distinction

between its literal and technical meanings as it differentiates it from Forensic Science. It also

highlights the use of forensic evidence in various disciplines such as Astronomy, Biology,

Geology, Archaeology and the alike. The focus, nevertheless, remains on its use in criminal

causes. Traditionally, such evidence is taken as non-binding and is used for corroboration

only. The lecture explores that the utility of the prevailing practice should be revisited and

such evidence may be classified to conclusive and corroborative, on the basis of latest

14

modern research. Should our stance remain unchanged despite the discovery of “Genetic

Code” in mid 80’s?

Methodology

Analysis of the relevant provisions will remain the basic technique. Comparison shall also be

drawn between them. The participants shall provide their input, especially when tools of

interpretation are applied. All these peculiarities will render the lecture analytical on one

hand and participative and comparative on the other. As a whole, our approach shall remain

jurisprudential, free of journalistic descriptions.

Learning Outcomes

At the end, the participants shall have developed the capability to;

Realize that equitable justice is the supreme objective.

Know the situations wherein Section 540 should be invoked.

Draw distinction between “Right Conclusion of the Case” and “Filling up the gaps” in

evidence of either party.

Understand that summoning of witnesses u/s 540 [part II] is mandatory.

Comprehend the literal and technical meanings of Forensic Evidence.

Realize the significance and evidentiary value of Forensic Evidence.

To classify Forensic Evidence on the basis of latest modern research and to evaluate

it accordingly.

Suggested Readings

1) Woodroffe on the Code of Criminal Procedure, compiled by Sheikh Abdul Halim,

Law Publishing Company Lahore, 1977.

2) The Code of Criminal Procedure by M. Mahmood, Al-Qanoon Publishers Lahore,

2013.

3) The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 by M. Mahmood, Al-Qanoon Publishers Lahore,

2013.

4) Forensic Evidence available at http://wikipedia.org/wiki/forensic _Science.

15

5) Building a Criminal Case Using Forensic Evidence available at

http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk.

6) Jack Claridge, Understanding Trace Evidence, find at

http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk

Trial in criminal Cases By

By Justice (R)Hamid Farooq Durrani

Concept:-

To achieve the ends of social justice and its administration as contemplated by Law while

remaining within the parameters of procedure / Rules .

Evolution :-

The Divine commandments

Before Medieval times

English legal system during Norman‘s regime

Development of statutory laws

Linchpin in administration of justice :

Adversarial legal system

To maintain social order through implementation of law

i ) Penalizing the violators of Law and rights

ii) compensating the victims /sufferers

iii) creating deterrence for others in society

DISTINCTION BETWEEN MODES OF TRIAL :

Jury Trial

Trial before special courts under special Laws

Trial conducted by judges /Magistrates

PROCEDURE:

http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/

http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/

16

Complex system of procedure

Delay due to hiccups in the procedure

Obsolete system of initiation of process

DISCREET APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE :

Outlook and approach towards appreciation of evidence

Guidance from precedents /case Law

PRAGMATIC INDULGENCE DURING TRIAL :

Use of discretionary powers and jurisdiction in appropriate cases

Embarking upon various provisions of CrPC in the said regard

Intelligent participation in recording of evidence and its

oversight

Exercise of powers u/s 249A and 265K CrPC

Provisions of Qanoon e Shahadat Order.

CRIMINAL TRIAL AND TRIAL OF A CRIMINAL :

i) Objective approach and its effects

ii) Subjective approach and its effects on outcome of trial .

PROCEEDINGS IN CIVIL CASES

By

Ms NusratYasmeen

INTRODUCTION

Since proceedings in civil cases are mainly regulated by the code of civil procedure,

therefore the lecture discusses the most relevant provisions of Code of civil procedure

“CPC”. CPC is a very exhaustive code which is primarily a procedural law but also contains

substantive provisions; and it may not be possible to encompass all provisions in the same

lecture. However an effort has been made to cover all those provisions which relate to

various stages of a civil suit it passes through. This lecture also describes the inter-se

17

relation of the various Sections and Orders contained in the Code. This lecture will be very

helpful in understanding the very scheme of the Code in its practical application to the

litigation before the court.

In this context the key objectives of the lecture are:

Basic understanding of relevant provisions of CPC.

Comprehension of inter-se relation of various Sections and Orders.

Practical application of provisions of CPC to litigations.

Understanding of the powers of court in dealing with civil cases.

Knowledge of provisions that can be pressed into service to overcome technicalities.

Methodology:

The lecture is descriptive as well as analytical. Descriptive in the sense, that it studies and

describes various provisions of CPC and analytical as it analysis the co-existence of the

Sections and Orders, and its applicability to cases before court.

18

EVALUATIONS

19

5. Evaluation

6.1 Pre Evaluation & Post Evaluation (Closed Ended Questions)

G1

Analysis:

The graph G1 represents the combined pre and post evaluation result of 06 trainings. The

closed ended questions in the pre evaluation and post evaluation were marked and

compared. A scale of 1-10 has been standardized for the results. The overall score for the

pre evaluation was 6.6 and the post evaluation result was 9.2, which shows significant

improvement in the knowledge based skills of participants after the training. The G1 is

based from the result of different MCQs. Each MCQ has a minimum 03 field (options) for the

participants of the training to choose from. These close ended questions were in MCQs form

and 02 MCQs were taken from each topic taught during the course.

Pre Evaluation

Post Evaluation

6.6

9.2

MCQS Based Result

20

6.2 Over all training Evaluation

According to graph 1, 98% of the trainees opined that course content was quite relevant to

their judicial work. Only 2% opined that the training will bring a little improvement in their

work. This number is negligible. Graph 2 reveals that 100% of the trainees are of the

opinion that the training material was highly useful. About the skills of the trainer, 79% saw

it “very good” and 27% saw it excellent. It shows that there is, though little, room for

improvement. As far as command of the trainers over the subject is concerned, 70% opined

that it was excellent. The remaining graphs shows that the training environment in the

academy was excellent, however their opinions in respect of accommodation and food

quality therein are worthy consideration Note: For the reason that some questions are

similar [see consolidated resource person feedback graph] and the results in graphs are

more or less the same, we have therefore left them uncommented.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

G1. Course relevancy

G2. Training Material Usefulness

G3. Skill of Trainer

G4. Logistics & Accomadations

100%

75%

50%

25%

21

6.3 Comparative Statistical Statement of Pre & Post Training Evaluation

The scales show the capacity level of the participants before and after training. Figure 1

(orange) indicates pre – training intellectual level of the trainees at their arrival in the

academy.

Figure 2 (blue) reveals their level after training. Figure 3 (green) points at the difference

between the two stages.

66%

91.00%

25.00%

Pre Training Level Post Training Level Improvement level

Improvement level

22

6.4 Consolidated Resource Person Evaluation by Trainees

The above graphical map is self explanatory. Each group of graph reflects the level of a specific

quality in all resource persons. For example the last group reflects that 98% participants see full

perfectness [100%] in motivation and professionalism exhibited by the pool of trainers during

training.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Oral Communication Skills?

Writing Communication Skills

Level of Confidence during Presentation

Level of Know-how about Computer and Audio-Visual Aids

Body Language and Eye Contacts during the Presentation

interpersonal, Networking and Social skills

Judgment and Perceptive ability about Issues

Level of Maturity

Level of Responsibility

Motivation and professionalism

Time Management

Learning Enthusiasm and Interest in the Subject

Handling Question Answers

Outstanding Excellent V. Good Good Average

23

ANNEXURE

24

Schedule of Activities

Training for Judges & Lawyers through Law & Justice Commission Pakistan (District D.I. Khan) 11 – 12 June 2014

Day -1 Topic Resource Person Duration

Registration & Pre Evaluation 8:30- 9:00

Recitation from the Holy Qur‘an & Duaa 9:05- 9:10

Introductory Remarks - DG, KPJA 9:10 – 9:20

Group A Evidence to substantiate case Mr. Niaz Muhammad Khan 9:20- 10:50

Tea Break 10:50 -11:00

Proceedings in Civil Cases

Ms. Nusrat Yasmin 11:00 – 12:30

Lunch & Prayer Break 12:30 – 1:30

How to address the adjournments and stay.

Ms. Sofia Waqar

1:30- 2:30

Professional Ethics Dr. Adnan Khan

2:30 – 4:00

Group B Topic Resource Person Duration

Pre Trial Proceedings (Criminal) Mr. Yahya Zahid Gillani 9:20- 10:50

Tea Break 10:50 -11:00

Trial in Criminal Cases Mr. Justice (R) Hamid Farooq Durrani

11:00 – 12:30

Lunch & Prayer Break 12:30- 1:30

Disposal of selected cases/probation Laws

Mr. Adil Khan 1:30- 3:00

Summoning of Witnesses u/s 540 CrPC & Significance of Forensic Evidence

Qazi Ataullah 3:00 – 4:00

25


Recitation from the Holy Qur‘an & Duaa

Group B Evidence to substantiate case Mr. Niaz Muhammad Khan 9:00- 10:30

Tea Break 10:30- 10:45




Ms. Sofia Waqar

12:10- 1:30


Professional Ethics Dr. Adnan Khan 2:30 – 4:00

Group A Topic Resource Person Duration


Tea Break


10:45 – 12:10

Disposal of selected cases/probation Laws Mr. Adil Khan 12:10- 1:30




Post training Evaluation & Concluding Ceremony

4:00-5:00

26

Training for Judges & Lawyers through Law & Justice Commission Pakistan (District Bannu)

13 – 14 June 2014

Day -1

Topic Resource Person Duration

Registration & Pre Evaluation 8:30- 9:00

Recitation from the Holy Qur‘an & Duaa 9:05- 9:10

Introductory Remarks - DG, KPJA 9:10 – 9:20

Group A Disposal of selected cases/probation Laws


Tea Break 10:50 -11:00

Evidence to substantiate case

Mr. Niaz Muhammad Khan 11:00 – 12:30

Lunch & Prayer Break 12:30 – 1:30


Ms. Sofia Waqar

1:30- 2:30

Professional Ethics Dr. Adnan Khan

2:30 – 4:00

Group B

Topic Resource Person Duration


Tea Break 10:50 -11:00


11:00 – 12:30


Evidence to substantiate case Mr. Niaz Muhammad Khan 1:30- 3:00



27


Recitation from the Holy Qur‘an & Duaa

Group B Disposal of selected cases/probation Laws


Tea Break 10:30- 10:45

Professional Ethics Dr. Adnan Khan 10:45 – 12:10


Ms. Sofia Waqar

12:10- 1:30




Group A Topic Resource Person Duration


Tea Break


10:45 – 12:10


Ms. Nusrat Yasmin 12:10- 1:30




Post training Evaluation & Concluding Ceremony

4:00-5:00

28

List of participants Training For Judges & Lawyers Through Law & Justice Commission Pakistan

Dated 09-21 June 2014

S.No

Name of Participant Designation Station Date of Training

1 Mr. Muhammad Ishaq Civil Judge/Illaqa Qazi

Chitral 09-10 June 2014

2 Ms. Aqsa Saeed Civil Judge/Illaqa Qazi II

Chitral 09-10 June 2014

3 Alam Zeb President (Lawyer) Chitral 09-10 June 2014

4 Raza Ali Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

5 Sajjad Ahmad Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

6 Sajid ullah Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

7 Alam Zeeb Khan Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

8 Alam Zeb Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

9 Muhammad Zahir Shah Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

10 Rizwanullah Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

11 Inayat ullah Khan Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

12 Fida Ahamd Javed Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

13 Miftahud Din Shah Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

14 Shahab ud din Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

15 Ghulam Mustafa Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

16 Nizar Ali Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

17 Ghulam Ali Shah Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

18 Sher Badshah Khan Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

19 Aziz ud Din Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

20 Aftab Rahim Khan Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

21 Sajjad Ali Shah Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June

29

2014

22 Abdul Wali Khan Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

23 Shams-ul-Islam Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

24 Niaz Ahmad Niazi Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

25 Muhammad Azim Baig Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

26 Fazle Rahim Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

27 Sarwar Kamal Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

28 Aftab Hussain Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

29 Khalil Ahmad Baig Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

30 Atta ur Rehman Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

31 Tanzilur Rehman Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

32 Gul Murad Khan Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

33 Muhammad Nawab Khan Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

34 Intizar Ali Khan Lawyer Booni 09-10 June 2014

35 Sher Habib Jan Lawyer Drosh 09-10 June 2014

36 Ikram Hussain Lawyer Drosh 09-10 June 2014

37 Ansar Ayub Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

38 Muhammad Rafi Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

39 Muhammad Ishaq Lawyer Chitral 09-10 June 2014

40 Ms. Javeria Sartaj Khan Director Instructions II

KPJA 11-12 June 2014

41 Mr. Muhammad Asghar Ali Civil Judge Tank 11-12 June 2014

42 Ms. Tahira Zanib Malik Civil Judge Tank 11-12 June 2014

43 Mr. Mohammad Aaqib Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

44 Mr. Ubaid Ullah Judicial Magistrate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

45 Mr. Khalid Mansoor Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

46 Mr. M.Umair Habib sial Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

30

47 Mr. Muhammad Haroon Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

48 Mr. Abid Zaman Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

49 Mr. Shakeel Ur Rehman Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

50 Mr. Dilnawaz Khan Kundi Advocate Tank 11-12 June 2014

51 Mr. Farman Ullah Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

52 Mr. M.Rizwan Khan Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

53 Mr.M.A Kamran khan Baloach Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

54 Mr. Haroon Rashid Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

55 Mr. Inam ullah kundi Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

56 Mr.Muhammad Jamal Khan Advocate Tank 11-12 June 2014

57 Mr. Mian Muhammad Jamshaid Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

58 Mr. Saree Ul Ehsan Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

59 Mr. Dil Awaiz Baloch Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

60 Mr.Javed Akhtar Kundi Advocate Tank 11-12 June 2014

61 Syed Israr Ali Shah Judicial Magistrate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

62 Mr. Qaiser Shahzad Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

63 Mr. Raja Muhammad Shoaib khan

Civil Judge D.I khan 11-12 June 2014

64 Mr. Mohib Ur Rehman Civil Judge D.I khan 11-12 June 2014

65 Mr. Muhammad Asghar Civil Judge D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

66 Mr. Yasir Jabran Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

67 Mr. Nausher Baloch Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

68 Mr. Saif Ullah khan Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

69 Mr. Awais Ali Advocate D.I Khan 11-12 June 2014

70 Mr. Damsaz khan Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

71 Mr. Fayyaz Hussain Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

72 Mr. Mubasher Ahmad Baloch Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June

31

2014

73 Mr.Muhammad Hanif Kamal Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

74 Mr. Asif Bilal Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

75 Mr. Nazir Ahmad Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

76 Mr. Sheikh Shafqat ur Rehman Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

77 Mr. Imran Sumuel Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

78 Mr. Muhammad Kamran Baloch Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

79 Mr. Abid Iqbal Qureshi Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

80 Mr. Muhammad Imran Khan Gandapur

Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

81 Mr. Sadique Ullah Kundi Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

82 Mr. Jamil Ahmad Turk Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

83 Mr. Muhammad Abid Bhittani Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

84 Mr. Murtaza Ali Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

85 Mr. Iftikhar Ali Marwat Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

86 Mr. Saleem Shahzad Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

87 Mr. Muhammad Usman Ali Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

88 Mr. Tenseer Ali Mehdi Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

89 Mr. Rashid Irfan Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

90 Mr. Muhammad Shoaib khan Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

91 Mr. Faheem Ahmad Baloch Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

92 Mr. Junaid Ahmad Kundi Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

93 Mr. Malik Muhammad Faisal Advocate D. I Khan 11-12 June 2014

94 Mr. Farman ullah Khan Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

95 Mr. Naeem ullah Jadoon Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

96 Mr. Khalid Anwar Kundi Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

97 Mr. Assad Ullah Khan Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

32

98 Mr. Hamid Kamal Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

99 Mr. Adam Khan Suleman Khel Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

100 Mr. Umar Azamat Khan Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

101 Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmed Civil Judge Bannu 13-14 June 2014

102 Mr. Amjad Hassn Tanoli Civil Judge Lakki Marwart 13-14 June 2014

103 Mr. Malik Muhammad Hassnain Civil Judge Lakki Marwart 13-14 June 2014

104 Mr. Rehan Samad Civil Judge Lakki Marwart 13-14 June 2014

105 Mr. Zaeem Ahmad Civil Judge Lakki Marwart 13-14 June 2014

106 Ms. Saadia Andaleeb Civil Judge Lakki Marwart 13-14 June 2014

107 Mr. Tasawar Hussain Civil Judge Lakki Marwart 13-14 June 2014

108 Mr. Asfandyar Ali Shah Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

109 Mr. Shaukat Khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

110 Mr. Ahmad Ullah Khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

111 Mr. Ahmad Ali Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

112 Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

113 Mr. Inamullah Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

114 Mr. Amir Ullah Khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

115 Mr. Karim Ullah khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

116 Mr. Nadeem Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

117 Mr. Muhammad Azghar Khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

118 Mr. Mujahid Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

119 Mr. Shahid Mangi Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

120 Mr. Sakhi-Ullah Khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

121 Mr. Akbar Ali Khan Advocate Bannu 13-14 June 2014

122 Haji Habib ur Rehman Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

123 Mr. Hamid ullah Khan Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June

33

2014

124 Mr. Farid ullah Shah Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

125 Mr. Sheikh Fazl ur Rehman Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

126 Mr. Waris Faheem Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

127 Mr. Masood Adanan Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

128 Mr. Habib Ullah Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

129 Mr. Naik Nawaz Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

130 Mr. Zafar ullah Khan Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

131 Mr. Kifayatullah Khan Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

132 Mr. Muhammad Riaz Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

133 Mr. Najeeb Ullah Khan Advocate Lakki Marwat 13-14 June 2014

134 Mr. Muhammad Riaz Advocate Karak 13-14 June 2014

135 Mr. Abdullah Advocate Karak (Takht-e-Nasrati)

13-14 June 2014

136 Mr. Irfan Ullah Advocate Karak (Takht-e-Nasrati)

13-14 June 2014

137 Mr. Aamir Farooq Advocate Karak (Takht-e-Nasrati)

13-14 June 2014

138 Mr. Wajahat ullah Advocate Karak (Takht-e-Nasrati)

13-14 June 2014

139 Mr. Fahad Ahmad Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

140 Mr. Alamgir Shah Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

141 Mr. Muhammad Jamil Khan Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

142 Mr. Fazal Nasir Shah Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

143 Mr. Farman Ali Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

144 Mr. Dost Muhammad Khan Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

145 Syed Shaukat Ullah Shah Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

146 Mr. Fazal Gul Civil Judge Swat 16-17 June 2014

147 Mr. Arshad Khan Civil Judge Dir Lower 16-17 June 2014

148 Mr. Tanveer Iqbal Civil Judge Dir Lower 16-17 June 2014

34

149 Mr. Akbar Ali Mohmand Civil Judge Dir Lower 16-17 June 2014

150 Mr. Muhammad Zahoor Civil Judge Dir Lower 16-17 June 2014

151 Mr. Muhammad Sher Ali Khan Civil Judge Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

152 Mr. Ikram Ullah Civil Judge Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

153 Mr. Inam Khan Civil Judge Malakand 16-17 June 2014

154 Ms. Saeeda Akhter Civil Judge Malakand 16-17 June 2014

155 Mr. Abdul Hassan Mohmand Civil Judge Shangla 16-17 June 2014

156 Mr. Muhammad Hanif Civil Judge Shangla 16-17 June 2014

157 Mr. Gulzar Ullah Civil Judge Shangla 16-17 June 2014

158 Mr. Nasir Khan Civil Judge Buner 16-17 June 2014

159 Mr. Abdul Qayyum Siddiqui Civil Judge Buner 16-17 June 2014

160 Mr. Attaullah Civil Judge Buner 16-17 June 2014

161 Mr. Faisal Khan Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

162 Mr. Sulaiman Khan Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

163 Mr. Murad Akmal Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

164 Mr. Zarawar Khan Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

165 Mr. Shah Nawaz Khan Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

166 Ms. Mehnaz Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

167 Ms. Saima Anwar Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

168 Ms. Humaira Shaukat Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

169 Mr. Abdul Haleem Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

170 Mr. Zia ud Din Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

171 Mr. Rahim Ullah Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

172 Mr. Siraj Ali Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

173 Mr. Umar Rahim Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

174 Mr. Navid Farid Advocate Swat 16-17 June

35

2014

175 Mr. Kishwar Khan Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

176 Mr. Bacha Bahadar Khan Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

177 Mr. Attaullah Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

178 Mr. Gohar Ali Advocate Swat 16-17 June 2014

179 Mr. Waheed Ahmad Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

180 Mr. Majeed Ullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

181 Mr. Jehanzeb Khan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

182 Mr. Alamzeb Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

183 Mr. Azizullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

184 Mr. Zia ud Din Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

185 Mr. Rahat Ullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

186 Mr. Sajjad Khan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

187 Mr. Abid Ullah Jan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

188 Mr. Hamid Ur Rehman Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

189 Mr. Rahatullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

190 Mr. Saeed ur Rahman Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

191 Mr. Imtiaz Khan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

192 Mr. Kifayyatullah Khan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

193 Mr. Ayaz Ahmad Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

194 Mr. Suliman Khan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

195 Mr. Jamil Faqir Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

196 Mr. Hanif Ullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

197 Mr. Shafiullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

198 Mr. Sabz Ali Khan Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

199 Mian Rafiullah Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

36

200 Mr. Amjad Karim Advocate Dir Upper 16-17 June 2014

201 Mr. Muhammad Abdullah Advocate Malakand 16-17 June 2014

202 Mr. Irfan Muhammad Advocate Malakand 16-17 June 2014

203 Mr. Amjad Ali Zaiwar Advocate Malakand 16-17 June 2014

204 Mr. Irshad Hussain Advocate Malakand 16-17 June 2014

205 Mr. Mohsin Niaz Advocate Malakand 16-17 June 2014

206 Mr. Ezaz Ali Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

207 Mr. Waqif Shah Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

208 Mr. Shah Wali Khan Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

209 Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Khan Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

210 Mr. Fayaz Ahmad Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

211 Mr. Abdul Hakim Khan Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

212 Mr. Sultan Rome Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

213 Mr. Majeed Ullah Khan Advocate Shangla 16-17 June 2014

214 Mr. Shameen Khan Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

215 Mr. Mehbood ur Rehman Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

216 Mr. Wali ullah Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

217 Mr. Israr Ahmad Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

218 Mr. Inam ur Rahman Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

219 Mr. Abdul Kabir Khan Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

220 Mr. Amir Zada Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

221 Mr. Said Jamil Shah Advocate Buner 16-17 June 2014

222 Mr. Basharat Rauf Swati Civil Judge Kohistan 18-19 June 2014

223 Mr. Rashid Rauf Swati Civil Judge Battagram 18-19 June 2014

224 Mr. Aman Ullah Khan Civil Judge Battagram 18-19 June 2014

225 Mr. Mohsin Abbas Civil Judge Battagram 18-19 June

37

2014

226 Mr. Amer Ali Civil Judge Manshera 18-19 June 2014

227 Ms. Lubna Zaman Civil Judge Manshera 18-19 June 2014

228 Ms. Farhana Tabbasum Civil Judge Manshera 18-19 June 2014

229 Ms. Rabia Abbasi Civil Judge Manshera 18-19 June 2014

230 Mr. Muhammad Umer al Farooq Civil Judge Manshera 18-19 June 2014

231 Mr. Amir Ali Afridi Civil Judge Manshera 18-19 June 2014

232 Ms. Hajira Rehman Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

233 Syed Tehrema Sabahat Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

234 Mr. Muhammad Faisal Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

235 Ms. Qurrat-ul-ain Rashid Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

236 Mr. Muhammad Shoaib Khan Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

237 Mr. Faisal Anjum Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

238 Mr. Muhammad Ghayas Khan Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

239 Mr. Shabbir Muhammad Durrani Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

240 Mr. Najeeb-ul-Haq Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

241 Syeda Tehrema Sabahat Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

242 Ms. Aliya Ihsan Swati Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

243 Mr. Tila Mohammad Civil Judge Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

244 Mr. Naveed Ahmad Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

245 Mr. Aftab Javed Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

246 Mr. Ijaz ur Rehman Qazi Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

247 Mr. Badar Munir Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

248 Mr. Adil Zeb Khan Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

249 Ms. Sidra Azmat Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

250 Mr. Qaiser Khan Afridi Civil Judge Haripur 18-19 June 2014

38

251 Mr. Muhammad Ilyas Advocate Battagram 18-19 June 2014

252 Mr. Humayun Khan Advocate Battagram 18-19 June 2014

253 Mr. Abdul Wahid Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

254 Mr. Gulam Ali Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

255 Mr. Muhammad Awais Ijaz Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

256 Mr. Sabir Ali Shah Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

257 Mr. Burhan Qayyum Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

258 Mr. Malik Waqar Ahmad Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

259 Mr. Qazi Zia ur Rehman Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

260 Mr. Yasir Hussain Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

261 Ms. Sumaira Nawaz Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

262 Ms. Aneela Sarfraz Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

263 Ms. Rakhshanda Zeb Khan Tannan

Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

264 Syeda Aleena Ayaz Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

265 Ms. Rabia Yousaf Rajpoot Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

266 Ms. Chand Kanwal Advocate Manshera 18-19 June 2014

267 Mr. Faraz Ahmad Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

268 Mr. Siraj Hussain Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

269 Mr. Nizakat Ali Tanoli Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

270 Mr. Haibit Khan Tanoli Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

271 Ms. Fouzia Ayub Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

272 Mr. Saima Riaz Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

273 Ms. Azra Iftikhar Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

274 Ms. Umbreen Taj Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

275 Ms. Sobia Pervaiz Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

276 Mr. Aaqil Malik Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June

39

2014

277 Mr. Muhammad Usman Ali Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

278 Mr. Ahmad Hussain Tanoli Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

279 Mr. Awais Abbasi Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

280 Ms. Sadia Haleema Advocate Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

281 Mr. Sardar Jan e Alam Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

282 Mr. Muhammad Naeem Akbar Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

283 Mr. Hassan Ali Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

284 Mr. Malik Hashim Ghani Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

285 Mr. Touqir Ahmed Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

286 Mr. Sardar Zia ur Rehman Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

287 Ms. Waqar-un-Nisa Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

288 Ms. Aamina Imam Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

289 Mr. Attique Ahmad Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

290 Ms. Farkhanda Jabeen Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

291 Ms. Tahira Bano Advocate Abbotabad 18-19 June 2014

292 Mr. Ghulam Habib Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

293 Mr. Waseem Akhunzada Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

294 Mr. Tauseef Ahmad Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

295 Mr. Munir Ahmad Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

296 Mr. Jawad Habib Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

297 Mr. Rab Nawaz Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

298 Mr. Adnan Fareed Advocate 18-19 June 2014

299 Mr. Muhammad Ali Qazi Advocate 18-19 June 2014

300 Mr. Muhammad Kashif Manzoor Advocate 18-19 June 2014

301 Mr. Nayyar Iqbal Advocate 18-19 June 2014

40

302 Mr. Mazhar Shah Advocate 18-19 June 2014

303 Mr.Faisal Shehzad Advocate Haripur 18-19 June 2014

304 Sayed Fazal Wadood Jan Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

305 Mrs. Shah Sultan Durrani Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

306 Ms. Natasha Zaman Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

307 Syed Murad Ali Shah Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

308 Ms. Qurat ul Ain Chand Irfan Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

309 Mr. Wajid Ali Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

310 Mr. Ihsan ul Haq Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

311 Mr. Muhammad Wali Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

312 Ms. Saira Iftikhar Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

313 Ms. Kiran Shaukat Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

314 Ms. Wadeeya Mushtaq Malik Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

315 Mr. Muhammad Asim Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

316 Mr. Bakht Zada Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

317 Mr. Ahmad Ehsan Qurashi Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

318 Mr. Shaukat Ahmad Khan Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

319 Mr. Zafar ullah Mohmand Civil Judge Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

320 Mr. Naseer Ahmad Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

321 Syed Mansoor Shah Bukhari Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

322 Mr. Saqib Khan Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

323 Syed Ijlal Hussain Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

324 Ms. Marya Wajahat Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

325 Ms. Beenish Ismail Syed Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

326 Ms. Shamsul huda Salarzai Civil Judge Mardan 20-21 June 2014

327 Ms. Hussan Bano Civil Judge Swabi 20-21 June

41

2014

328 Mr. Shah Faisal Civil Judge Swabi 20-21 June 2014

329 Syed Zahid Shah Civil Judge Swabi 20-21 June 2014

330 Mr. Ajmal Tahir Civil Judge Swabi 20-21 June 2014

331 Syed Iftikhar Shah Civil Judge Swabi 20-21 June 2014

332 Mr. Ihtesham ul Haq Danishmand Khan

Civil Judge Charasadda 20-21 June 2014

333 Ms. Nusrat Naz Civil Judge Charasadda 20-21 June 2014

334 Mr. Shah Hussain Civil Judge Charasadda 20-21 June 2014

335 Mr. Mazhar Hussain Civil Judge Charasadda 20-21 June 2014

336 Syed Hamid Qasim Civil Judge Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

337 Mr. Zia Jehangir Civil Judge Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

338 Mr. Abdul Wahab Qureshi Civil Judge Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

339 Mr. Wajahat Hussain Mir Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

340 Ms. Asma Gul Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

341 Syed Naveed Ali Shah Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

342 Mr. Imran Saeed Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

343 Ms. Musrat Andaleeb Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

344 Ms. Anam Shahbaz Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

345 Mr. Yasir Khalid Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

346 Mr. Akhlaq Ahmad Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

347 Mr. Muhammad Asif Tajik Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

348 Mr. Sifat ullah Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

349 Mr. Abid Hayat Safi Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

350 Syed Bilal Shafi Andrabi Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

351 Ms. Meena Qaisar Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

352 Ms. Hasbia Javed Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

42

353 Ms. Mehmooda Gul Advocate Peshawar 20-21 June 2014

354 Ms. Shakeela Zaman Advocate Mardan 20-21 June 2014

355 Mr. Sulaiman Shah Advocate Mardan 20-21 June 2014

356 Mr. Abubakar Siddique Advocate Mardan 20-21 June 2014

357 Mr. Mohammad Iqbal Advocate Mardan 20-21 June 2014

358 Mr. Mudassir Nazar Advocate Mardan 20-21 June 2014

359 Mr. Suhaib Akhter Advocate Mardan 20-21 June 2014

360 Mr. Mazhar Ali Khan Advocate Swabi 20-21 June 2014

361 Mr. Hamid Ali Yousafzai Advocate Swabi 20-21 June 2014

362 Ms. Safia Naz Advocate Swabi 20-21 June 2014

363 Mr. Safdar Zeb Advocate Swabi 20-21 June 2014

364 Mr. Kareem Bakhsh Advocate Swabi 20-21 June 2014

365 Mr. Arif Jamal Advocate Charsadda 20-21 June 2014

366 Ms. Hina Qaiser Advocate Charsadda 20-21 June 2014

367 Mr. Muhammad Irshad Khan Advocate Charsadda 20-21 June 2014

368 Mr. Yousaf Ali Advocate Charsadda 20-21 June 2014

369 Qazi Shakeel Ahmad Advocate Charsadda 20-21 June 2014

370 Mr. Asad Khan Advocate Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

371 Mr. Muhammad Zubair Advocate Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

372 Mr. Rab Nawaz Khan Advocate Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

373 Mr. Ghazi Abid ullah Advocate Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

374 Mr. Ali Haider Khan Advocate Nowshera 20-21 June 2014

43

Welcome Speech of the Director General

It is a great occasion for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Judicial Academy that we are entering into a

new era. We are involving the lawyers in the training process. We have many plans and

programmes for the training of lawyers.

Judicial system in Pakistan hinges on two horns of a bull; one is the judges i.e. the district

judiciary as well as the High court and the second is the lawyers, commonly called

advocates. A single bar intervenes between the two; on one side there is judge and on the

other side of the bar there is advocate. Both of them have got similar responsibilities. Both

are answerable to Almighty Allah in the same way. One is to decide and the other is to

assist.

Assistance is sometimes more important than the decision, because decision is made on the

basis of assistance which is given. It is a sort of ladder that when you climb a building, you

use a ladder and if the ladder is strong you reach the roof safely and quickly and if the

ladder is weak there is always a chance that you may fell down and you may not reach the

roof. So to me the person standing on the other side of the bar is more important and more

responsible.

Ladies Gentlemen! You have selected a very tough job. You have selected a job which

imparts more responsibility, which imposes a larger duty of the nation upon you, because

you represent the justice seeker. It is a wrong conception that the plaintiff or the

complainant is the justice seeker and the defendant or accused is not the justice seeker.

Both the parties have come to the court for justice. And their mouths and their faces are

lawyers. This being the position, he is a very important segment of the society. When we

were lawyers we used to hear in the bar and we use to say that we are the cream of the

society. And I still believe that bar is the cream of the society. You are face of the nation. If

you are disciplined, the nation is disciplined. If you fight for justice, the nation gets justice.

Ladies and Gentlemen! This is your Academy. You are an important segment of the justice

system and it is our duty to transfer what we have to improve your capacities. I hope you

will enjoy the day here and your attitudes and behavior will be changed from tomorrow.

Wish you best of luck.

44

Class Representative Remarks (Consolidated)

On behalf of all my colleagues may I take the pride to pay our gratitude to Hon’able Chief

Justice for affording us the opportunity to take part in this one week’s training program. The

Academy is a marvelous achievement and an institution of its own kind. It is a dream come

true and no doubt KPK Judiciary took long strides in this direction. It was not possible

without the able leadership and patronage of the Hon Chief Justice. The way this Academy is

being managed and the efforts being put are excellent by all means. We can foresee that all

these efforts would transform this small Academy to a gigantic centre of excellence of

judicial and legal studies and the milestone is not that far.

Now coming to our training part, within this short span of time we really enjoyed the legal

and academic environment, presentation sessions, views of the resource persons and what

is more the heated debates over a number of issues of jurisprudential concepts and legal

practices. Though this short period of training could not satiate the intellectual thirst, it was

sufficient to make us learn, discuss and debate, share our respective angles of seeing a

thing, share our experiences and what is more we learnt to listen to the mind of each other.

It appears that when we came here we had only our own views and experiences, but while

leaving now we are carrying with us experiences of each other.

On academic part the resource persons, staff of the Academy as well the visiting faculty,

generated sufficient interest to involve us in discussions. We started with important topics

of framing of charge, public nuisance, oath by the parties and its evidentiary significance,

execution of decrees and bail. The lecture on anomalies and conflict between different laws

by Mr. Niaz Khan was most interesting and thought provoking. Specifically after that

particular presentation we felt how deficient we are and we really lack juristic approach for

interpretation of statutes.

We have also been asked to submit detail report as to the quality of training and point out

areas where further improvement can be made. The report shall be prepared and

submitted. This feedback shall help further making the training programs more meaningful

and effective. In that respect few of our suggestions are:

1. Reading material may be provided beforehand.

45

2. At the start of training, a session may be conducted to apprise the participants how

to participate, discuss things in an impersonal way and listen to other’s point of view with

patience.

3. Each participant must be given at least one topic well before the training to prepare

and present it during the session.

4. More hunting may be made for truly academic and research loving resource persons.

With these humble submissions I again thank you all specially the DG, the academic and

administrative wings for your valuable support and benevolent treatment.

Thanks

46

GROUP

PHOTOS

47

Lawyers and Judges of District Abbottabad

Lawyers and Judges of District Chitral

48

Judges and Lawyers of District D.I. Khan

Judges and Lawyers of District Swat

49

Judges and Lawyers of District Peshawar

june 2014 consolidated report on training for judges ... · the training activity for district...

Documents