june 21, 2011 c/o neill brower jeffer, mangels, butler and ... appendices... · june 21, 2011...

June 21, 2011 “CONFIDENTIAL: SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE, WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE AND JOINT DEFENSE PRIVILEGE” Mr. Steve Magee C/O Neill Brower Jeffer, Mangels, Butler and Mitchell, LLP 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, Ca 90067 Subject: Limited Phase II Site Assessment Report Ponte Vista

26900 South Western Avenue Los Angeles, California 90732 W&A Proposal # SFIB-11-0720

Dear Mr. Magee: Winefield & Associates, LP (W&A) is pleased to present this report of limited Phase II site assessment activities completed at the above-referenced site. The site, an approximate 61.53 acre property, is located in the 26900 block of South Western Avenue, San Pedro, California as shown in Figure 1 (attached). 1.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the work was to collect soil, groundwater, and soil gas samples from the subsurface to conduct a preliminary assessment of the lateral and vertical extent of petroleum impacts at the site. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK To meet the objectives described above, W&A conducted the following scope of work:

• Drilled and installed 5 borings (one to groundwater) at the locations shown on Figure 2 (attached).

• Collected and analyzed soil samples from all borings at a minimum of five-foot

intervals to total depth.

• Collected and analyzed a groundwater sample from the single boring where water was encountered above the maximum depth investigated.

Mr. Steve Magee RE: Limited Phase II Site Assessment Report June 21, 2011 W&A Project No.SFIB-11-0720 Page 2 of 11

• Collected and analyzed soil gas samples from WB-1 (VP-2), WB-3 (VP-1), and

WB-6 (VP-3).

2.1 Pre-Field Activities 2.1.1 Permits A well permit was obtained from the County of Los Angeles Environmental Health Department on April 26, 2011 (Attachment A). 2.1.2 Health and Safety Plan Preparation A site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) was prepared by W&A. Workers present onsite during sampling activities were required to read and sign the HASP. The HASP was maintained onsite at all times while conducting field activities. 2.1.3 USA Mark Out W&A contacted the Underground Service Alert (USA) hotline more than 48 hours prior to advancement of the borings. A ticket number was issued by USA stating which utility providers were notified prior to field activities. 2.1.4 Borehole Clearance Each borehole location was cleared by a private geophysical locator. The W&A drilling subcontractor hand-augered to five feet below ground surface (bgs) to clear the boring locations for shallow utilities. 3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY Regional and local geologic and hydrogeologic information for the site were reviewed previously by W&A through numerous documents prepared for the subject property and the adjacent Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) San Pedro facility immediately to the north of the subject site. The following subsections (3.1 through 3.4) were taken from a Phase I Environmental Assessment (W&A, 2011) prepared recently by W&A for the subject property. 3.1 Regional Geology Various descriptions of the regional geology in the area of the site have been presented in reports prepared previously for the site by others. Numerous site assessments have occurred at the adjacent DFSP facility from at least the 1990’s to the current day. Based on our review of this data and typically relied upon references, we believe the following


information taken directly from The Source Group Inc. (Source, 2010d) presents the most comprehensive view of the regional geology.

“DFSP San Pedro is situated at the base of the northeastern flank of the Palos Verdes Hills on the southern margin of the Torrance Plain, approximately 2 miles north of the Pacific Ocean and less than 1 mile from Los Angeles Harbor. Ground surface elevations range from approximately 25 feet above mean sea level (MSL) on the eastern side of the property to approximately 260 feet above MSL in the west. The hills are cut by several ravines and gullies. The primary ravine (often referred to as the “central ravine”) bisects the site and trends west to east through the center of the property. North, east, and northeast of the facility lies basin fill, shallow alluvium, and sediments of the late Pleistocene Lakewood and San Pedro Formations, along with the early Miocene Monterey Formation (California Department of Water Resources [CDWR], 1961). The shallow alluvium rests on the Lakewood Formation, with an unconformity separating the Lakewood from the underlying San Pedro Formation. The marine and continental deposits of the Lakewood Formation include the Gage aquifer, which consists of fine sand with interbedded silty and sandy clay and silty and clayey fine to medium sand. The Gage aquifer is approximately 100 feet thick in the vicinity of the site. The marine San Pedro Formation includes the Lynwood and Silverado aquifers. These aquifers are approximately 150 and 300 feet thick, respectively, and reportedly consist of stratified sands with some beds of fine gravel, silty sand, and silt. Clayey zones separate the three aquifers. The total vertical distance from the ground surface to the base of the Silverado aquifer is approximately 850 feet. The presence of the Lynwood and Silverado aquifers has not been confirmed to date by well installations or deep soil borings at the DFSP San Pedro site. Directly beneath the hilltop USTs, the Miocene Monterey Formation is separated from the overlying lower Pliocene San Pedro Sand and Lomita Marl Formations by an unconformity. The upper Miocene Malaga mudstone of the Monterey Formation crops out in the area of the facility. This formation consists of radiolarian-bearing marine mudstone and fine-grained siltstones. Outcrops of this formation, generally light-brown or olive-grey in color, are present in the western portion of the property. Above the San Pedro Formation units lay upper Pleistocene to recent marine and non-marine terrace deposits (Palos Verdes Sand and non-marine Terrace Cover). Northwest/southeast-trending faults and folds characterize the primary structural setting of the area. The Gaffey Anticline and Syncline, both characteristic structural features, have been shown to cross the site. The Palos


Verdes Fault Zone is the prominent fault structure near the facility. This northwest-trending fault zone is immediately north of the Palos Verdes Hills. Evidence of near-surface offset has been reported in the area of the site (Woodring et al., 1946).”

3.2 Site Geology In 1996, Geoservices advanced four soil borings at the site along the northern border with the DFSP property. They reported predominantly San Pedro sands and silty sand to depths up to 120 feet bgs, except in one boring where black cohesive clay was encountered between 90 and 125 feet bgs. The drilling interpretation was that the sand in these borings was from the Lower Pleistocene San Pedro formation and the clay of the Miocene Monterey Formation, Malaga mudstone member (Geoservices, 1997). The Byer Group advanced 28 borings to maximum depths of 60 feet bgs at the site. Their report characterizes soils at the site as fill ranging in depth from 2 to 24 feet bgs, consisting of an upper silty sand layer. A lower layer is described as clayey sand, with clayey sand at the base. The base clayey sand layer reportedly contains petroleum in the form of tar, and potentially fuel (Byer Group, 2005). The fill in the southeast portion of the site (the undeveloped land) sits on an alluvium layer between five and nine feet thick, consisting of alternating layers of sand and silty sand, with some gravel and organic material. The recent alluvium sits on top of older alluvium, which consists of clayey sand. This layer also contains some gravel. In the north and center portion of the site the fill sits on Pleistocene San Pedro Formation (Byer Group, 2005). 3.3 Regional Hydrogeology As with the regional geology, numerous interpretations of the hydrogeology in the area of the site have been presented in previous reports by others, and in reference documents. Numerous groundwater assessments have occurred at the adjacent DFSP facility from at least the 1990’s to the current day. Based on our review of this data and typically relied upon references, we believe the following information taken directly from The Source Group Inc. (Source, 2010d) presents the most comprehensive view of the regional hydrogeology.

“Major saturated zones north and east of the site reportedly include the Gage, Lynwood and Silverado Aquifers (Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity [NEESA], 1990). The Palos Verdes Fault Zone is reported to act as a hydrogeologic barrier separating the northeastern and southwestern areas near the fault zone (Woodward-Clyde Consultants, March 1992). Regional groundwater gradient in the shallow Gage Aquifer is reported generally toward the northwest, although local gradient variations occur. Three municipal wells are located north of Anaheim Street and a water-production


well is located at the ConocoPhillips (former Unocal/Tosco) refinery east of Gaffey Street. These three wells reportedly produce water from the Silverado aquifer. An important variable in understanding the groundwater regime beneath the property is the Dominguez Gap Barrier Project (Barrier Project). The Barrier Project consists of a series of groundwater injection and monitoring wells that were installed and are maintained by the Los Angeles County Department of Public works (LACDPW, formerly the Los Angeles County Flood Control District). The purpose of these wells is to control salt-water intrusion into the freshwater aquifers of the West Coast Basin through the Dominguez Gap. Salt-water intrusion has been occurring since the early part of the 20th century and has been progressing inland through the shallow freshwater aquifers such as the Gage and the Gaspur Aquifers. The Barrier Project functions by injecting freshwater into the aquifers through a series of injection wells extending east-west from the Harbor Freeway to Alameda Street, and northeast-southwest between Anaheim Street and Sepulveda Boulevard. The wells are generally located along Anaheim Street and Alameda Street. The nearest Barrier Project well is located northeast of DFSP San Pedro, within approximately 1 mile of the Administration Area. Injection along the Barrier Project commenced in February 1971 and was primarily into deeper aquifer units, including the Gage Aquifer. This injection produces a groundwater mound which results in pressure gradients in the aquifers from the point of the injection wells. The pressure gradients “push” against the invading salt water, thus preventing further migration landward. The injection wells, therefore, are expected to significantly influence groundwater gradients in the deeper aquifers beneath DFSP San Pedro and the surrounding area. During the most recent site-wide groundwater monitoring event in April 2009, depth to groundwater in Tank Farm Area wells that did not contain floating product ranged from 18.08 to 137.69 feet below the tops of the well casings. Groundwater elevations in the Tank Farm Area ranged from 25.36 feet above MSL (near Tank 20) to 203.79 feet above MSL. In April 2009, groundwater gradients northwest of Tank 20 were toward the southwest at approximately 0.042 to 0.045 feet per foot (ft/ft). Groundwater is present at a depth of approximately 120 feet bgs in the vicinity of Tank 20. The gradient direction just south of Tank 20 appears to be toward the east, based upon gauging data collected from the wells installed during this investigation.”

Depth to groundwater in the Tank Farm Area was reportedly measured from 17.83 to 121.94 feet below the tops of the well casings. Sixteen wells are screened in a deeper saturated zone, 19 in a shallower zone. Groundwater gradient in the shallow zone is


identified as toward the southeast in the central portion, the south in the west-central portion, toward the north-northeast in the northwest portion. The gradient in the deeper zone is reported to the southeast (Source, 2010a). Depth to groundwater in the Pump House Area was reportedly measured from 12.61 to 38.63 feet below the tops of the well casings. Groundwater gradient is identified as toward the north and northeast, with local deviations (Source, 2010a). Depth to groundwater in the Administration Area was reportedly measured from 46.15 to 77.50 feet below the tops of the well casings. Groundwater gradient is identified as toward the south, southwest in the north and central portion of the area, with flow to the northeast in the southern portion of the area (Source, 2010a). Earlier groundwater monitoring data collected from site wells were interpreted by Bechtel (1996) to indicate an easterly groundwater flow direction. Geoservices (1997) reported that DFSP San Pedro is hydraulically cross- to up gradient of the subject property. 3.4 Site Hydrogeology In 1996, Geoservices advanced 4 borings in lawns of residential units on the northeast side of John Montgomery Drive and northwest corner of Samuel Dupont Avenue. Groundwater was found between 85 and 120 feet bgs with groundwater depth increasing as the ground elevation increased. The local groundwater flow was identified as towards the east-southeast (Geoservices, 1997). Perched groundwater was encountered at the site within the lower part of the fill at about 17 feet bgs in one of the 28 borings drilled in 2005. The water was reportedly perched on the older alluvial clayey sand layer. Groundwater was not found below the fill layer to a depth of 50 feet bgs (Byer Group, 2005). 4.0 FIELD WORK 4.1 Boring Advancement/Probe Installation Borings were advanced using a hollow stem auger drilling rig operated by Cascade Drilling of La Habra, California. Access to subsurface soils was provided by grinding a 10-inch hole through the asphalt pavement at the locations shown on Figure 2. Prior to the on-site investigation, locations WB-1 and WB-2 were moved from locations behind housing units to the yard or street in front of these units due to inaccessibility of the originally planned locations. Six borings were initially planned to between 25 and 65 feet bgs, increasing in depth toward the northern boundary of the property. Total planned drilling footage was 270 feet. Regional groundwater was deeper than anticipated, and a total of 292.5 feet were


drilled by the completion of the fifth boring in an attempt to reach groundwater. As a result, a soil boring was not completed at the sixth location (PWB-1). Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals. Samples were collected in brass tubes, capped with Teflon sheets and plastic end caps and placed on ice for transport to a fixed base laboratory. Samples were tracked with a chain-of-custody. Soils were field-screened for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID) calibrated to 50 parts per million (ppm) of isobutylene. Field screening consisted of placing soil collected in the shoe of the split-spoon sampler in a zip-locking plastic bag, and following equilibration, the probe tip of the PID was inserted in the headspace of the bag and the resulting PID reading was recorded on the soil boring log. Following collection of soil samples, borings were backfilled to approximately 6-inches bgs by installing bentonite chips using a tremie pipe. Bentonite backfill was charged by pouring water through the tremie pipe at the manufacturer recommended rate. Copies of original boring logs completed during the investigation are included as Attachment B. Boring WB-6 was the first boring completed. Soils encountered in this boring to ten feet bgs consisted of silty sand and clayey sand. A one-foot thick clay layer was encountered at 11 feet bgs. Slightly consolidated, friable clayey sands and siltstone were present from approximately 11 to 21 feet. Hydrocarbon odors were noted from approximately 15 to 21 feet bgs. PID readings within this interval ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 ppm. Fine, poorly-graded sands were noted from 25 to 66.5 feet bgs. PID readings were all 0.0 in this interval with the exception of 0.1 ppm at 55 and 65 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered to a depth of 66.5 feet bgs. A five-foot depth soil vapor probe (designated VP-3) was installed in a 5-foot bgs hand-augered boring located approximately 3-feet from the drilled borehole. Boring WB-4 was the second completed boring and was drilled to a total depth of 76.5 feet bgs. Soils encountered in this boring were sand to approximately 5 feet bgs with a clayey silt layer present from at least 5 to 6.5 feet bgs. Below 6.5 feet bgs to total depth soils were grayish brown to orange, poorly graded sand with silty sand logged at the 65 foot depth. In an effort to encounter groundwater the boring was extended deeper than the planned maximum depth of 65 feet. With the exception of 0.2 ppm measured at the 70-foot depth, no PID readings above 0 ppm were recorded. Groundwater was not encountered in this boring. Boring WB-5 consisted nearly entirely of silty fine to medium grained sand to the 15 feet bgs. Perched groundwater was encountered at 10 feet bgs in fine to medium grained sand with clay globules and perched on approximately 1.5 feet of silty clay encountered at the 15- to 16.5 feet bgs. The boring was terminated at a depth of 16.5 feet bgs. In accordance with the proposed scope of work, a grab groundwater sample was collected at this location.


Boring WB-2 consisted of light gray to orange brown, silty sand to clean poorly graded sands to 66.5 feet bgs. A thin but distinct horizon of light blue-gray sand and clay interbeds were noted at 45.5- to 46 feet bgs. No groundwater was encountered to the total depth of the boring. PID readings ranged from 0.0 to 0.5 ppm at the 65-foot depth. Boring WB-3 consisted of soil types very similar to WB-2. A weakly cemented gray siltstone was noted from 40- to 40.5-feet bgs. No groundwater was encountered to the total boring depth of 66.5 feet bgs. A five-foot depth soil vapor probe (designated VP-1) was installed in a 5-foot depth hand-augered boring located approximately 3 feet from the drilled borehole. No borehole was drilled at proposed location PWB-1 due to the surpassed footage allotment. A five-foot depth soil vapor probe (designated VP-2) was installed in a 5-foot depth hand-augered boring at the location indicated on Figure 2. 4.2 Groundwater Sampling A grab groundwater sample was collected from boring WB-5 by lowering a 1-inch diameter PVC slotted screen and riser pipe into the open borehole. Water was withdrawn from this pipe using a 3/8-inch polyethylene tube equipped with a one-way foot valve. The groundwater sample was transferred to laboratory-supplied containers, and placed on ice for transport to a fixed-base laboratory. 4.3 Soil Gas Sampling Once soil and groundwater sampling was completed at locations WB-6 and WB-3, a 1/4-inch diameter Teflon tube attached to a porous ceramic implant was embedded in one-foot of sand at depth of five feet bgs in a 1.5-inch diameter hand-augered boring. The same procedure was completed at PWB-1 as noted above. Dry granular bentonite followed by hydrated bentonite grout was added to the boring above the sand to ground surface. The temporary gas probes thus completed were allowed to equilibrate for approximately seventy two hours prior to sampling. On May 2, 2001, soil gas samples were collected from each probe using a Summa canister. Sampling consisted of purging each probe a rate of less than 200 milliliters/minute for a total purge volume equivalent to three dead space volumes. Following collection of soil vapor probes, the probe tubing was removed from the boreholes and the surface of each patched with asphalt to match the surrounding grade. 5.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS A total of 58 soil samples were analyzed by the Test America Laboratories, Inc. in Irvine, California for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) with carbon chain ranges from C6 to


C36 using EPA Method 8015B. Samples for gasoline-range hydrocarbons were prepared using a purge and trap extraction method analyzed using a combination of gas chromatograph and flame ionization detector (GC/FID). Sample for diesel- and heavier-range hydrocarbons were prepared using a solvent extraction, and analyzed using a GC/FID. The analytical laboratory data provided by Test America, Inc. are included as Attachment C. The groundwater sample collected from boring WB-5 was analyzed for TPH by EPA Method 8015B and for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B. The soil gas samples were analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260B. The analytical laboratory data provided by Jones Environmental Laboratories, Inc. is included as Attachment C. 6.0 FINDINGS 6.1 Soil Gas Soil gas samples were below laboratory detection limits for all constituents analyzed for this investigation. 6.2 Groundwater The groundwater sample was below laboratory detection limits for all constituents analyzed for this investigation. 6.3 Soil Petroleum hydrocarbons in the C10 to C36 range were detected in 10 of 58 samples analyzed for this investigation. In eight of the ten samples, hydrocarbon concentrations in any one carbon chain range were low enough to appear in only the total of carbon chain ranges. In the 15-foot depth sample from boring WB-6, a TPH concentration of 1,900 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was detected. 140 mg/kg of TPH was detected in the 10-foot sample from boring WB-5. As indicated in Table 1, no gasoline range hydrocarbons were detected in any of the soil samples analyzed. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS Soil gas and groundwater sampled and analyzed for this investigation were not impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons.


9.0 REFERENCES Winefield & Associates, LP (W&A), 2011. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,

Ponte Vista, 26900 South Western Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90732. March, 2011.

Byer, 2005. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Proposed Multi-Family

Residential Development, Lot 1, Tract 3192, 26900 South Western Avenue, San Pedro, California, The J. Byer Group, Inc., June 21, 2005

DWR, 1961. Planned Utilization of the Groundwater Basins of the Coastal Plain of the

Los Angeles County, Bulletin 104, Appendix A Groundwater Geology State of California, Southern District, Department of Water Resources, 1961

Geoservices, 1997. Final Environmental Groundwater Study, San Pedro Housing, San

Pedro California, September 27, 1997 Source, 2010a. First Semiannual 2010 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report,

Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro, July 21, 2010 The Source Group, Inc. Source, 2010d. Assessment and Delineation Report, Tank 20 Release, Defense Fuel

Support Point, San Pedro, November 1,2010, The Source Group, Inc. USGS, 1981. United States Geological Survey Topographic Map 1964 (photo revised

1981) 7.5 minute series, Torrance Quadrangle, California, scale: 1:24,000, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.

Woodring et al., 1946. Woodring, W.P., M.V. Bramlette, and W.S. Kew, 1946 Geology and Paleontology of the Palos Verdes Hill, California, United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 207

W:\Projects\2011\SFI Bridgeview\SFIB-11-0720\Final Work Product\Limited Phase II Site Assessment Report\SFIB-11-0720 Site Assessment Report MEC revised.docx

Mr. Steve Magee RE: Limited Phase II Site Assessment Report June 21, 2011 W&A Project No.SFIB-11-0720 Attachments

Figures and Tables

Phase II Limited Environmental Assessment ReportJune 1, 2011

RE: Ponte Vista, 26900 S. Western Ave., San PedroW&A Project No. SFIB-10-133

Site

Base Map FIGURE 1Base Map FIGURE 1SITE LOCATION MAP

United States Geological Survey Ponte VistaInglewood Quadrangle 26900 South Western Avenue

7.5 minute Series Topographic Map San Pedro, CA1964, Photorevised 1981 W&A Project No. SFIB-10-133

VP-2

WB-2

WB-6VP-3

WB-5

WB-3VP-1

WB-4

Legend WB-2 Winefield Soil Boring 4/28‐29/2011 VP-1 Winefield Vapor Probe 4/28‐29/2011© Google Base Map

Winefield Boring and Soil Vapor Figure 2

Sample Locations

Limited Phase II Soil Sampling ReportTables

Ponte VistaWinefield No .SFIB‐11‐0720

Sample ID PQL

WB‐2‐10

WB‐2‐15

WB2

‐20

WB2

‐40

WB2

‐50

WB3

‐30

WB‐5‐10

WB‐6‐5

WB‐6‐10

WB‐6‐15

Petroleu

m

Hydrocarbon

Ra

nge

Hydrocarbons C6 ‐ C12 (volatile) 1.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Gasoline*

Hydrocarbons C10 ‐ C28 3.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,420 Diesel*

Hydrocarbons C29 ‐ C36 3.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 480 HeavyTotal Extractable Hydrocarbons C10‐C36 5 5.4 10 8.2 7.4 6.2 9.8 140 13 10 1,900PQL ‐ practical quantitation limit

mg/kg ‐ milligrams per kilogram

ND ‐ not detected above the PQL

Samples analyzed using Environmental Protection Agency Method 5030/8015B(M) (LUFT) with GC/FID

*Gasoline and diesel range organics as defined in EPA SWA‐846 Method 8015C (February 2007)

Ponte Vista

26900 South Western Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90732

Purge and Trap

Solvent Extraction

mg/Kg

Table 1

Summary of Detected Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil

Samples Collected April 28‐29, 2011

W:\Projects\2011\SFI Bridgeview\SFIB‐11‐0720\Working Drafts\Table 1


Attachment A

Well Permits


Attachment B

Boring Logs

WB-2

Drilling Rig: CME 95Borehole Dia.: 4"Total Depth:Groundwater Investigation DataDepth GW Encountered:Samples Collected: NATotal Length of Casing:

Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

4

7 0.0

7

5

66.5' bgs

Not Encountered

BOREHOLE LOG

Silty SAND: dark brown, fine grained, moderately sorted, slightly moist

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, moderately sorted, slightly moist

Tubing Material: NATubing Diameter: NA

10

Sample Equipment: CA Split SpoonSample Diameter: 2"Total Samples: 1366.5' bgs

NA Depth to Slotted Screen: NA

Soil Gas Investigation Data

Description

W&A Project No.: BBASFIB-11-0720Date: 4/28/2011

Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling LP

SURFACE: 6" asphalt

5

Field Geologist: LeAnn AndrewsSoil Investigation Data

5 0.0

8

5

5 0.0

7

5

9 0.2

13

15

25 0.0 SW

Ben

toni

te G

rout

SMy , g , y , g y

15

Sandy SILT: brown, slightly moist, low plasticity, trace clay

20

ML

SAND: gray, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist, trace FeO staining25

Silty SAND: brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist

Page 1 of 3

WB-2


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

40

13

19 0.0

28

14

BOREHOLE LOG

SAND: gray, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist, trace FeO staining

SAND: brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist, trace FeO staining

S

Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling LPField Geologist: LeAnn Andrews

Soil Investigation DataSample Equipment: CA Split Spoon

30


Sample Diameter: 2"Total Samples: 13

Tubing Material: NA

3

66.5' bgs

Tubing Diameter: NADepth to Slotted Screen: NA


Description

26

Not Encountered

NA

29 0.1

40

23

50 0.0

13

25 0.1

40

13

20 0.1

Ben

toni

te G

rout

SAND: light gray, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist, trace FeO staining

SW

Silty SAND with clay: light blue gray intermixed with dark orange, fine grained, low plasticity, poorly graded, slightly moist

SM

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, moderately sorted

35

50

40

45

Page 2 of 3

WB-2


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

30

23

50

25


Soil Investigation Data

nton

ite G

rout

BOREHOLE LOG

SM

Silty SAND with clay: light blueish gray intermixed with dark orange, fine grained, low plasticity, poorly graded, slightly moist

Silty SAND: light gray intermixed with dark orange, fine grained, moderately sorted, slightly moist

55

Description

51

Not Encountered

NA

Tubing Material: NATubing Diameter: NADepth to Slotted Screen: NA

66.5' bgs

Sample Equipment: CA Split SpoonSample Diameter: 2"Total Samples: 13Soil Gas Investigation Data


50

NA

Ben

65

SAND: orangish brown, medium grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

SP

60

SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slighlty moist, silt inclusions

Page 3 of 3

WB-3


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

SW

10

7 0.0

8

11

BOREHOLE LOG

SAND: orangish brown, fine to medium grained, slightly moist, clay globules, trace gravel



Description

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, moderately sorted, slightly moist

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, moderately sorted, slightly moist, trace clay globules


Sample Equipment: CA Split SpoonSample Diameter: 2"Total Samples: 13

SM

NA

5



SURFACE: 6" asphalt

66.5' bgs66.5' bgs

Not Encountered

15 0.0

18

11

13 0.0

11

10

13 0.0

15

19

27 0.0 SM

Ben

toni

te G

rout

Silty SAND: orangish brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist

20

25

10

15

SW

Silty SAND: light gray intermixed with dark orange, fine grained, slightly moist

SAND: orangish brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist

Page 1 of 3

WB-3


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

35

23

50 0.0

45

BOREHOLE LOG

SM Silty SAND: light gray intermixed with dark orange, fine grained, slighlty moist





Tubing Material: NANot Encountered

NA

66.5' bgs



Description

26

30

50 0.0

20

35 0.0 ML

50/4

27

50 0.0

23

50 0.0

Ben

toni

te G

rout

Silty SAND: light gray intermixed with dark orange, fine grained, slightly moistSM

50

SILTSTONE: weathered, light gray40

45

Silty SAND: light gray, fine grained, moderately sorted, slighlty moist, FeO staining

35

Page 2 of 3

WB-3


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

30

23

50 0.0



onite

Gro

ut

BOREHOLE LOG

Silty SAND: light gray, fine grained, moderately sorted, slightly moist, FeO staining55

51

SM

Description

Not Encountered

NA


66.5' bgs



23

50 0.0

35

50/4 0.0

Ben

to

SAND: light gray, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist, FeO staining

60

65

SAND: light gray, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

SW

SP

Page 3 of 3

WB-4

Drilling Rig: CME 95Borehole Dia.: 6"Total Depth:Groundwater Investigation DataDepth GW EncounterSamples Collect NATotal Length of Casin

Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

7

12 0.0

18

47

BOREHOLE LOG

SAND: brown, fine to coarse grained, well graded, trace gravel & cobbles, slightly moist

SAND: orangish brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist



Description

Clayey SILT: brown, low plasticity, slightly moist, trace fine to medium grained sand

SAND: orangish brown, fine to coarse grained, well graded, trace gravel and cobbles



NA

5

SW

ML



SURFACE: 6" Asphalt

76.5' bgs76.5' bgs

Not Encountered

50/6 0.0

17

25 0.0

17

25 0.0

17

25 0.0

Ben

toni

te G

rout

SM Silty SAND with gravel and cobbles: orange, brown, gray, fine to coarse grained, weathered granite bedrock, slightly moist

70

75

10

15

SAND: orangish brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

SAND: light grayish brown, fine grain, poorly graded, slightly moist

SP

Page 1 of 3

WB-4


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

45

22

28

40

37

BOREHOLE LOG

SAND: light grayish brown, fine grain, poorly graded, slightly moist





Tubing Material: NA

NA

76.5' bgs



3

Description

26

30

Not Encountered

50/6

27

50/4

27

50/4

27

50/4

Ben

toni

te G

rout

SP

SAND: light olive gray, medium grained, poorly graded, slightly moist, FeO staining

35

75

40

70

Page 2 of 3

WB-4


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

35

50/4 0.0

35



BOREHOLE LOG

SAND: light olive gray, medium grained, poorly graded, slightly moist, FeO staining

51

55

60

SP

Description

Not EncounteredSoil Gas Investigation Data

SA i h b di i d l d li h l i


NA


76.5' bgs


50/4 0.0

30

50 0.0

45

50/4 0.2

40

50 0.0 CL

70

75

60

65 Ben

toni

te G

rout

SAND: orangish brown, medium grained, poorly sorted, slightly moist

Silty SAND: dark orange with gray inclusions, fine to medium grained, well graded, trace gray, silt lenses

SW

SAND: orangish brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist, trace gravel

SAND: gray, fine to medium grained, well graded, FeO staining

CLAY: brown, medium plasticity, slightly moist

Page 3 of 3

WB-5

Drilling Rig: CME 95Borehole Dia.: 6"Total Depth:Groundwater Investigation DataDepth GW Encountered:Samples Collected: 1Total Length of Casing:

Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

SM

SW



SURFACE: 6" Asphalt

SM

16.5' bgs16.5' bgs

10' bgs

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist5

10

Silty SAND: brown, fine o medium grained, moist


Description



NA

BOREHOLE LOG

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

SAND: brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, slightly moist

nton

ite G

rout

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist, trace silt inclusions

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, slightly moist, clay globules


Silty CLAY: black, medium plasticity, slightly moistCL

10

15Silty CLAY: brown, medium plasticity, wet

Silty SAND: brown, fine to medium grained, well graded, wet, trace gravel and clay globules

Be

Page 1 of 1

WB-6


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

ML

5

7 0.0

15

6 SC

BOREHOLE LOG



Description


Sample Equipment: CA Split SpoonSample Diameter: 2"Total Samples: 1266.5' bgs66.5' bgs

Not Encountered



SURFACE: 6" asphalt

Sandy SILT with Clay: brown, low plasticity, slightly moist

5

10Clayey SAND with Silt: dark gray, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

NA

Silty CLAY brown, medium plasticity, slightly moist, trace gravel

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

CLAY: brown, medium plasticity, slightly moist

SM

CL

17 0.0 CL

15

0

16

16 0.0 SM

19

0.3

17

30 0.1

30 SP

5

7 0.0 SP

Ben

toni

te G

rout

20

SAND: orangish brown, fine grained, poorly graded, moist25

10

15

SP

ML

Silty SAND with Gravel: dark gray, fine to medium grained, well graded, moist

Silty CLAY: brown, medium plasticity, slightly moist

SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, clay globules, slightly moist

MLWeathered SILTSTONE: gray, dry

Weathered SILTSTONE with Sand: gray and brown, friable, dry

SILT: gray, slightly moist

SAND: fine grained, dark brown, poorly graded, moist

Page 1 of 3

WB-6


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

8

5

7 0.0

11

7

BOREHOLE LOG

SAND: orangish brown, fine grained, poorly graded, moist

SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist, slightly cemented



30



Tubing Material: NA

NA

3

66.5' bgs



Description

26

Not Encountered

9 0.0

9

NA

0.0

10

12 0.0

12

10

12 0.0

Ben

toni

te G

rout

35

50

40

45

Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, low plasticity, slightly moist, trace clay

SP

SAND: orangish brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

Page 2 of 3

WB-6


Blo

w

Cou

nts

Sam

ple

Dep

th(f

t.)R

ecov

ery

PID

USC

S Backfill Material

12 51

14 55

15 0.1

15

17 60

BOREHOLE LOGDrilling Company: Cascade Drilling LPField Geologist: LeAnn Andrews


nton

ite G

rout


Description

Not Encountered

NA


66.5' bgs


SM Silty SAND: brown, fine grained, poorly graded, low plasticity, slightly moist, trace clay

S

SAND: gray and orange, fine to medium grained, well graded, FeO staining

25 0.0

35

25 65

35 0.1 ML

40 SPB

enSAND: gray and orangish brown, fine grained, poorly graded, slightly moist

SW

SAND: gray and orange, fine grained, well graded, FeO staining

SILT: brown, dry, slightly cemented

Page 3 of 3


Attachment C

Laboratory Analytical Reports

ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Irvine17461 Derian Avenue. Suite 100Irvine, CA 92614Tel: (949) 261-1022

TestAmerica Job ID: IUD2808Client Project/Site: SFIB-11-0720

For:Winefield & Associates, Inc. - Irvine19700 Faichild, Suite 170Irvine, CA 92612

Attn: Grayson Carlton

Authorized for release by:05/09/2011 05:00:21 PM

Pat AbeProject [email protected]

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC requirements for accredited parameters,exceptions are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAC, this report may not be reproducedexcept in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contactthe Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signatureis intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Page 1 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspxhttp://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htmhttp://www.testamericainc.commailto:[email protected]

Table of Contents

Client: Winefield & Associates, Inc. - IrvineProject/Site: SFIB-11-0720

TestAmerica Job ID: IUD2808

Page 2 of 61TestAmerica Irvine

05/09/2011

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: IUD2808Client: Winefield & Associates, Inc. - Irvine

Project/Site: SFIB-11-0720

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

IUD2808-01 WB-2-5 Soil 04/28/11 15:35 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-02 WB-2-10 Soil 04/28/11 15:40 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-03 WB-2-15 Soil 04/28/11 15:43 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-04 WB-2-20 Soil 04/28/11 15:45 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-05 WB-2-25 Soil 04/28/11 15:50 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-06 WB-2-30 Soil 04/28/11 16:00 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-07 WB-2-35 Soil 04/28/11 16:03 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-08 WB-2-40 Soil 04/28/11 16:05 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-09 WB-2-45 Soil 04/28/11 16:10 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-10 WB-2-50 Soil 04/28/11 16:17 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-11 WB-2-55 Soil 04/28/11 16:20 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-12 WB-2-60 Soil 04/28/11 16:25 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-13 WB-2-65 Soil 04/28/11 16:35 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-14 WGW-5 Water 04/28/11 18:45 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-16 WB-5-5 Soil 04/28/11 14:05 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-17 WB-5-10 Soil 04/28/11 14:15 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-18 WB-5-15 Soil 04/28/11 14:21 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-19 WB-6-5 Soil 04/28/11 07:50 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-20 WB-6-10 Soil 04/28/11 07:55 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-21 WB-6-15 Soil 04/28/11 08:00 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-22 WB-6-20 Soil 04/28/11 08:04 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-23 WB-6-25 Soil 04/28/11 08:10 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-24 WB-6-30 Soil 04/28/11 08:14 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-25 WB-6-35 Soil 04/28/11 08:20 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-26 WB-6-40 Soil 04/28/11 08:25 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-27 WB-6-45 Soil 04/28/11 08:30 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-28 WB-6-50 Soil 04/28/11 08:35 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-29 WB-55 Soil 04/28/11 08:40 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-30 WB-60 Soil 04/28/11 08:45 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-31 WB-65 Soil 04/28/11 08:50 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-32 WB-4-5 Soil 04/28/11 10:29 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-33 WB-4-10 Soil 04/28/11 10:35 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-34 WB-4-15 Soil 04/28/11 10:40 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-35 WB-4-20 Soil 04/28/11 10:47 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-36 WB-4-25 Soil 04/28/11 10:50 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-37 WB-4-30 Soil 04/28/11 11:00 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-38 WB-4-35 Soil 04/28/11 11:05 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-39 WB-4-40 Soil 04/28/11 11:10 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-40 WB-4-45 Soil 04/28/11 11:15 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-41 WB-4-50 Soil 04/28/11 11:17 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-42 WB-4-55 Soil 04/28/11 11:27 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-43 WB-4-60 Soil 04/28/11 11:30 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-44 WB-4-65 Soil 04/28/11 11:35 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-45 WB-4-70 Soil 04/28/11 11:40 04/28/11 18:45

IUD2808-46 WB-4-75 Soil 04/28/11 11:45 04/28/11 18:45

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 3 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Analytical DataTestAmerica Job ID: IUD2808Client: Winefield & Associates, Inc. - Irvine


Lab Sample ID: IUD2808-01Client Sample ID: WB-2-5Matrix: SoilDate Collected: 04/28/11 15:35

Date Received: 04/28/11 18:45

Method: EPA 8015B - EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (CADHS/8015B)

Result Qualifier RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac

EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND

Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits

n-Octacosane 80 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 22:40 1.0

Surrogate

Method: EPA 8015B MOD - HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTION (EPA 8015 Mod.)


Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons (C6-C12) ND M1 0.95 mg/kg 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 10:23 1.0

Analyte

0.95 mg/kg 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 10:23 1.0Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons (C6-C7) ND



4-BFB (FID) 103 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 10:23 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) 5.4 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 82 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:00 1.0

Surrogate

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 4 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9







Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons (C6-C12) ND 0.98 mg/kg 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 10:51 1.0

Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 101 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 10:51 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) 10 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 85 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:20 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 98 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 12:24 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) 8.2 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 5 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9





Method: EPA 8015B - EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (CADHS/8015B) (Continued)


EFH (C20 - C21) ND 3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 71 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/04/11 23:40 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 87 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 13:48 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 61 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:00 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 98 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 14:27 1.0

Surrogate

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 6 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9







EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 73 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:20 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 87 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 14:55 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 67 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 00:40 1.0

Surrogate

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 7 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9








Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 99 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 15:23 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) 7.4 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 67 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:00 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 99 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 15:51 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 8 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9





Method: EPA 8015B - EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (CADHS/8015B) (Continued)


EFH (C20 - C21) ND 3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 63 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:20 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 95 65 - 140 05/04/11 14:00 05/05/11 00:47 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) 6.2 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 74 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 01:41 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 98 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 17:43 1.0

Surrogate

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 9 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9







EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 71 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 02:41 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 99 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 18:11 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 73 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:01 1.0

Surrogate

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 10 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9








Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 82 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 18:39 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 75 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:21 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte




4-BFB (FID) 106 65 - 140 05/04/11 14:00 05/05/11 01:14 1.0

Surrogate

Lab Sample ID: IUD2808-14Client Sample ID: WGW-5Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 04/28/11 18:45


Method: EPA 8260B - VOLATILE ORGANICS with OXYGENATES by GC/MS (EPA 8260B)


Benzene ND P, pH 2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0

Analyte

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Bromobenzene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Bromochloromethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Bromodichloromethane ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Bromoform ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Bromomethane ND P, pH L

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 11 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9





Method: EPA 8260B - VOLATILE ORGANICS with OXYGENATES by GC/MS (EPA 8260B) (Continued)


n-Butylbenzene ND P, pH 5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0

Analyte

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0sec-Butylbenzene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0tert-Butylbenzene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Carbon tetrachloride ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Chlorobenzene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Chloroethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Chloroform ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Chloromethane ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.02-Chlorotoluene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.04-Chlorotoluene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Dibromochloromethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Dibromomethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2-Dichlorobenzene ND P, pH



5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Dichlorodifluoromethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1-Dichloroethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2-Dichloroethane ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1-Dichloroethene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2-Dichloropropane ND P, pH



2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1-Dichloropropene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Ethylbenzene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Hexachlorobutadiene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Isopropylbenzene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0p-Isopropyltoluene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Methylene chloride ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Naphthalene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0n-Propylbenzene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Styrene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Tetrachloroethene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Toluene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1,1-Trichloroethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Trichloroethene ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Trichlorofluoromethane ND P, pH L

10 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2,3-Trichloropropane ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND P, pH

TestAmerica Irvine

Page 12 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9





Method: EPA 8260B - VOLATILE ORGANICS with OXYGENATES by GC/MS (EPA 8260B) (Continued)


1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND P, pH 2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0

Analyte

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Vinyl chloride ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0m,p-Xylenes ND P, pH

2.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0o-Xylene ND P, pH

4.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Xylenes, Total ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Di-isopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0Methyl-tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) ND P, pH

5.0 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND P, pH

50 ug/l 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0tert-Butanol (TBA) ND P, pH


4-Bromofluorobenzene 88 P, pH 80 - 120 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.0

Surrogate

Dibromofluoromethane 114 P, pH 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.080 - 120

Toluene-d8 102 P, pH 05/09/11 07:09 05/09/11 11:50 1.080 - 120

Method: EPA 8015B - VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (EPA 5030/8015)


GRO (C4 - C12) ND 50 ug/l 05/03/11 08:00 05/03/11 22:32 1.0

Analyte


4-BFB (FID) 120 65 - 140 05/03/11 08:00 05/03/11 22:32 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) ND 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C26 - C27) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C28 - C29) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C30 - C31) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0EFH (C32 - C36) ND


n-Octacosane 86 40 - 140 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 03:41 1.0

Surrogate




Analyte



TestAmerica Irvine

Page 13 of 61 05/09/2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9






4-BFB (FID) 97 65 - 140 05/02/11 07:00 05/02/11 19:35 1.0

Surrogate





EFH (C10 - C36) 140 5.0 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0

Analyte

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C10 - C11) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C12 - C13) ND

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C14 - C15) 4.3

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C16 - C17) 9.3

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C18 - C19) 10

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C20 - C21) 15

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C22 - C23) 12

3.5 mg/kg 05/02/11 10:02 05/05/11 05:40 1.0EFH (C24 - C25) 14

3.5 mg/kg

june 21, 2011 c/o neill brower jeffer, mangels, butler and ... appendices... · june 21, 2011...

Documents