june 22, 2011 · knowledge of occupational choices, skills, work habits, and job leads necessary...

June 22, 2011

1

NORTH CENTRAL STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEE’S MEETING

Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:00 pm – Fallerius Technical Education Center – Board Room (149-F)

I. CALL TO ORDER - Mr. Steven Stone

A. Pledge of Allegiance B. College Mission Statement

II. ROLL CALL – Mr. Stephen Williams

III. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS – Mr. Donald Plotts

IV. FOCUS OF THE MEETING – Mr. Steven Stone

V. GOVERNANCE POLICIES

A. Nominating Committee Report (IAW 02.91) – Ms. Edith Humphrey & Dr. Mehdi Ressallat

B. Board Self-Assessment (IAW 02.16) – Mr. Steven Stone

C. Campus Quality Survey Action Plan (IAW 4.30)

– Ms. Betty Wells/Mr. Ken Ekegren

D. ENDS Policy Baseline Data (IAW 04.11c) –Mr. Tom Prendergast Pages 26-32

VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION – Mr. Steven Stone

Collective Bargaining – To prepare for, conduct or review collective bargaining strategy Personnel Matters – Matters to be discussed affect specific personnel

VII. REQUIRED APPROVALS AGENDA – Mr. Steven Stone

A. Consent Agenda

Minutes:

1. Approval of Minutes for May 25, 2011 Pages 5-13

Personnel Actions:

2. Consideration of Approval of Employment of College Personnel Page 14 - R-2011-27

2

B. Treasurer’s Report for May 31, 2011 – Ms. Lori McKee Page 15

C. Consideration of Approval of Tuition Increase – R-2011-28 Pages 16 – Ms. Lori McKee

D. Consideration of Approval of 2011-2012 Budget – R-2011-29 Page 17-19 – Ms. Lori McKee

E. Consideration of Approval of College Personnel Pages 20-23 Employment Contracts – R-2011-30 – Ms. Lori McKee

VIII. PRESIDENT’S REPORT – Mr. Donald Plotts

A. North Central State College Phi Theta Kappa Update – Ms. Sarah Mendell

B. North Central State College Foundation Update – Mr. Brad Peffley

C. DEI President’s Meeting /Achieving the Dream Institute (June 13 – 17th)

D. Chief Finance Officer (CFO) Search Update

E. Supplemental Information Page 24-43

F. Other

IX. BOARD CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT – Mr. Steven Stone

A. OSU-Mansfield Board Meeting (June 17th) – Mr. Steven Stone Next OSU-M Board Meeting August 20th

B. Board of Trustees Meeting Dates for 2012 3

C. OACC Annual (spring) Conference (Thursday, May 26th & Friday, May 27th)

D. ACCT Leadership Congress (October 12 – 15, Dallas, Texas)

E. 2011-2012 Link & Learn

– Samaritan Hospital (Ashland, OH) – OSU-M/NCSC Joint Board Function

F. Rock-n-Ribs (July 14, 15 & 16)

G. Summer Board of Trustees Retreat H. Chancellor’s “In-person” Trustee Conference (August 11th) Page 35 I. Other

3

X. MEETING EVALUATION – Mr. Steven Stone

Board Agenda Setting /Evaluation

XI. TIME AND PLACE OF NEXT MEETING

Wednesday, August 24, 2011 – 7:00 pm – Fallerius Technical Education Center, BOT Conference Room 149-F

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

1. Separations Report – June 2011 Page 25 2. ENDS Policy Metrics – Baseline Data Pages 26-32 3. Board of Trustees Meeting Dates for 2012 Page 33-34 4. Chancellor’s “In Person” Trustee Conference Page 35 5. Ohio Senate Budget Talking Points w/ TPP Pages 36-40 6. OACC Letter of Support for $200 Tuition Cap Pages 41-42 7. OACC Research Report 20110613 3

BOARD OF TRUSTEE MEETING DATES

2011 All meetings will be held at NC State Main Campus

Fallerius Technical Building Board Room

7:00 pm (unless otherwise announced)

NCState Rep. OSU-M Meeting Date NCState Meeting Date OSU-M Rep.

E. Humphrey January 21, 2011 January 12, 2011

Feb. 18, 2011 February 23, 2011 D. Gooch

D. McElfresh March 18, 2011 March 23, 2011 @ Urban Center

M. Brunn

K. Singleton April 15, 2011 April 27, 2011 P. Heydinger

L. Reid May 20, 2011 May 25, 2011 J. Roby

June 17, 2011 June 22, 2011 M. Howard

August 19, 2011 August 24, 2011 D. Schenk

Sept. 16, 2011 Sept. 28, 2011 J. Shuler

October 21, 2011 October 26, 2011 P. Siegenthaler

December 2, 20112 December 7, 2011 C. Ticoras

OSU-M 2011 Meeting Dates

January 15th

April 16th

July 16h May be Canceled October 15

th

February 19th

* May 14th

*** August 20th

November 19th

**

March 19th

June 18th

September 17th

December 17th

**

Meetings are 11:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. in Eisenhower Room 113 (Board Room)

1 – July meetings are usually cancelled

2 - The November and December meetings may be combined and scheduled on December 2nd

Revised:4/19/11

Page 1 of 1

North Central State College Board of Trustees (2011 - COLLEGE ACTIVITIES CALENDAR)

June 2011: 9 – NC State Graduate Picnic (Kee Hall)

10 – NC State Commencement

17 – OSU-M Board of Trustees Meeting

22 – Regular June Board of Trustees Meeting (Fallerius)

23 – Kehoe Community Development Project

July 2011: 14, 15, 16 – Rock-n-Ribs

No Regular Board meeting scheduled for July

August 2011: 3-5 ACCT New Trustee Governance Leadership Institute (Wash. D.C.)

11 – Chancellor’s 2011 “In-person” Trustee Conference (OSU-Columbus)

19 – OSU-M Board of Trustees Meeting

24 – Regular August Board of Trustees Meeting (Fallerius)

September 2011: 16 – OSU-M Board of Trustees Meeting

28 – Regular September Board of Trustees Meeting (Fallerius)

October 2011: 12-15 ACCT Annual Leadership Congress (Dallas, TX)

21- OSU-M Board of Trustees Meeting

26 – Regular October Board of Trustees Meeting (Fallerius)

November 2011: 10-12 ACCT Governance Leadership Institute on Diversity (Tampa, FL)

The Nov. & Dec. OSU-M meetings may be combined on Dec. 2nd

No Regular Board meeting scheduled for November

December 2011: 2 or 17 – OSU-M Board of Trustees Meeting

3 – Employee Appreciation Dinner (Kehoe Center Banquet Room)

7 – Regular December Board of Trustees Meeting (Fallerius)

8 – NC State College Holiday Open House (Kehoe Center)

Values

• EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE

• LEARNER-FOCUS

• COMMUNITY RESPONSIVENESS

• DIVERSITY

• ACCESS

• INNOVATION

• TEAMWORK

Vision

North Central State College, a model college of the 21st century, will promote a flexible and responsive, learner-centered environment that is committed to meeting community educational and training needs.

By offering progressive educational programs, NC State will revitalize the learning process. We are committed to a quality faculty and staff building bridges to local communities by actively contributing to the social, economic, educational, and cultural well-being of North Central Ohio.

Mission

To provide quality, responsive, lifelong learning opportunities, including occupational, degree and other educational programs for individuals, business and industry, and the communities we serve.

North Central State College

ENDS Policy Statements

1.0 Global Ends Policy - North Central State College exists for the citizens of

its service region to have the knowledge and skills to succeed in their chosen

path for learning, work, or enrichment, sufficient to justify available resources.

1.1 Equal Opportunity/Diversity - The proportion of students from

economically or educationally disadvantaged backgrounds is at least equivalent

to the proportion in the local communities.

1.2 Job Readiness - Students prepared for employment success will have the

knowledge of occupational choices, skills, work habits, and job leads necessary

for economic self-sufficiency.

1.3 High Demand/Emerging Technologies - Students are capable of

successfully performing in a variety of roles in business and industry including

high demand and emerging technology industries.

1.4 Career Development - Students acquire, maintain, and enhance job skills

that remain relevant in changing jobs markets.

1.41 Foundation for learning (The ability to learn)

1.42 Flexible and creative problem solving

1.43 Necessary licenses and certificates

1.44 Administrative skills

1.5 Transferability - Students prepared for advanced academic success will

have the ability and the prerequisite academic experience sufficient for entry

into a four-year college or university.

1.6 Enrichment - Enrichment opportunities exist to reflect community needs

and values.

Required Approvals Agenda

A. Consent Agenda

Minutes:

1. Approval of Minutes for May 25, 2011

Personnel Actions:

2. Consideration of Approval of Employment of College

Personnel - R-2011-27

B. Treasurer’s Report for May 31, 2011 – Ms. Lori McKee

C. Consideration of Approval of Tuition Increase – R-2011-28

– Ms. Lori McKee

D. Consideration of Approval of 2011-2012 Budget – R-2011-29

– Ms. Lori McKee

E. Consideration of Approval of College Personnel Employment

Contracts – 2011-30 – Ms. Lori McKee

1

North Central State College Board of Trustees’ Meeting

May 25, 2011

I. CALL TO ORDER

The Chair, Mr. Steven Stone called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. in the Fallerius

Technical Education Center Board of Trustees conference room. At that time he asked all

to rise and join him in reciting the pledge of allegiance followed by his reading of the

Mission Statement for North Central State College.

II. ROLL CALL

The Recorder, Mr. Stephen Williams called the roll.

Present: Mr. Michael Carroll

Mrs. Edith Humphrey

Dr. Dwight McElfresh

Dr. Mehdi Ressallat

Ms. Lydia Reid

Ms. Kimberly Singleton

Mr. Matthew Smith

Mr. Steven Stone

III. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS

President Donald Plotts introduced Ms. Lori McKee, Ms. Peg Moir, Dr. Karen Reed and

Ms. Betty Wells, representing the President’s Staff; Ms. Beth Price and Ms. Nancy

Kukay, representing the Manager’s Advisory Council; Ms. Carol Allen representing the

Staff Caucus, and Ms. Margaret Puckett, Ms. Dorie Ford, Ms. Ellen Johnson, Ms. Carol

Wolfe, Mr. Phil Martin, Mr. Jeff Taylor, Mr. Matthew Cupach, Mr. Ross Justice, Ms.

Jean Jones, Ms. Lisa Music, Ms. Carolyn Kaple, Ms. Beth Franz, and Ms. Jennifer Lynn,

representing the Faculty Association. Student Sarah Mendell was present representing the

Beta Theta Eta chapter of Phi Theta Kappa; Mr. Rodger Smith was present representing

the Ohio State University, Mansfield Board of Trustees; Ms. Lori McKee, Controller and

Mr. Tom Prendergast, Director of Institutional Research and Grants were present as well.

IV. FOCUS OF THE MEETING

Mr. Steve Stone explained that the primary focus of tonight’s meeting was to continue

with the board self evaluation, establishment of ENDS policy baseline data, and to hear

the results of the Campus Quality Survey.

2

V. GOVERNANCE POLICIES – Mr. Steve Stone

A. Discussion of Nomination Committee (IAW 02.91)

Mr. Steven Stone called for the nomination committee report. Co-chair, Dr. Mehdi

Ressallat reported that his conversation with the governor’s office revealed that they had

in fact, received sufficient applications for the vacant position to make an appointment

decision but the governor’s office is working to appoint soon.

B. Board Self-Assessment (IAW 02.16)

Mr. Steven Stone distributed the board self assessment tally sheet. He encouraged all

trustees to be sure to submit their assessment immediately following the meeting. After a

number of months the board will be able to review these materials and note trends. Some

weakness comments to note thus far included: following the agenda, participation in the

board discussions and activities needs to be better. Some strong comments to note

included: establishment of a well-planned agenda, work has been accomplished in

improving trust and openness. Following Mr. Stone’s report on assessment survey

participation results various members of the board echoed the importance in needing

better participation in submitting the self-assessment surveys in order to get an accurate

assessment of the board’s performance as a collective body.

C. ENDS Policies Baseline Data (IAW 04.11c) – Mr. Stephen Williams/Mr. Tom

Prendergast

Mr. Stephen Williams explained very soon the CEO will be presenting the Board with his

first round of monitoring reports. As the board reviews these reports, it will have to

deliberate and make an assessment in two areas, (a) the reasonableness of the CEO’s

interpretations, using a “reasonable person test” rather than with interpretations favored

by individual board members and (b) whether data demonstrated the CEO’s/Institution’s

accomplishment of the interpretation (IAW 03.44). The information that will be

presented by Mr. Tom Prendergast is presented in accordance with policy 04.11c in the

spirit of giving the board some baseline data from which to begin formulating an

educated definition of reasonableness that may help the board put further discussions and

assessments into a proper context toward establishing reasonableness. Mr. Tom

Prendergast distributed an information sheet on ENDS policy baseline data on Equal

Opportunity, Diversity and Transferability and provided some discussion of the data

presented for each of the respective areas of ENDS policy.

D. Campus Quality Survey (IAW 2.41b, 3.43b, 3.45, 4.30) – Mr. Steven Stone

Mr. Steven Stone reviewed the Gardner-Shaw Report from the Campus Quality Survey.

He explained that the report showed what was done in 2003 compared to what was done

in 2011 and further explained that the report looks at eight different areas. Mr. Stone

proceeded to discuss some of the highlights between the two and highlighted some

features of this year’s report. Mr. Matthew Smith indicated that he appreciated the

continuity between the two reports. Mr. Stone pointed out that the report included both

institutional strengths and weaknesses. The report recommended (1) distribution to the

college community, (2) the development of an action plan to address the areas of

3

opportunity. Mr. Steven Stone reminded the Board that this report was to be defined as an

external report that would in turn be used by the CEO toward the development of

monitoring reports and an ensuing action plan. President Don Plotts indicated that the

report would be sent to the planning advisory council for review and used as the basis for

developing an appropriate action plan. The PAC will plan to bring back a timeline for

actions to be considered from the report results.

VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION

The Chair called for an Executive Session at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Mike Carroll made a motion

and it was seconded by Dr. Dwight McElfresh to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss

Collective Bargaining Strategy. A roll call vote on the motion was approved unanimously

by all members present.

Mr. Michael Carroll – “yes”

Mrs. Edith Humphrey – “yes”

Dr. Dwight McElfresh – “yes”

Ms. Lydia Reid – “yes”

Dr. Mehdi Ressallat – “yes”

Ms. Kimberly Singleton – “yes”

Mr. Matt Smith - “yes”

Mr. Steve Stone - “yes”

Upon a motion made by Dr. Dwight McElfresh seconded by Ms. Kimberly Singleton to

end the Executive Session at 8:35 p.m., and to reconvene the regular Board meeting, a

roll call vote on said motion was approved unanimously by all members present.

Mr. Michael Carroll – “yes”

Mrs. Edith Humphrey – “yes”

Dr. Dwight McElfresh – “yes”

Ms. Lydia Reid – “yes”

Dr. Mehdi Ressallat – “yes”

Ms. Kimberly Singleton – “yes”

Mr. Matt Smith - “yes”

Mr. Steve Stone - “yes”

VII. REQUIRED APPROVALS AGENDA

A. CONSENT AGENDA

The Chair presented the Consent Agenda. On a motion by Dr. Dwight McElfresh and

seconded by Ms. Lydia Reid and passing unanimously, the following items were

approved:

1. Approval of minutes for April 27, 2011

4

2. Consideration of Approval of Employment of College Personnel

– R-2011-23

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF

EMPLOYMENT OF COLLEGE PERSONNEL

R-2011-23

NEW HIRES

BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that the following Child Development staff

member is hereby awarded the prescribed salary at the beginning date stipulated below.

BEGINNING MAY 17, 2011

Rebecca Wolfe, Kitchen Assistant

SALARY: $8.00/hr. based on 25 hrs./week

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that the following staff member is

hereby awarded the prescribed salary at the beginning date stipulated below.

BEGINNING MAY 23, 2011

Jill Kubasek, Administrative Assistant/TRIO Student Services Program

Associate in Arts degree in Secretarial Science

SALARY: $12.19/hr. based on 25 hrs./week

EXPLANATIONS OF NEW HIRES FOR RESOLUTION R-2011-23

Rebecca Wolfe replaces Paula Triplett.

Jill Kubasek replaces Kristin Jaggers.

3. Consideration of Approval of College Personnel Professional Growth

Recognition – R-2011-24


COLLEGE PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL GROWTH RECOGNITION

R-2011-24

WHEREAS: Susan Elliott has supplied documentation that she has completed 60% of a

Master’s degree in Business Administration.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that $1,560.09 be added to base

salary of $40,412.74 to $41,972.83, effective May 2, 2011, in recognition of completion of 60%

of a Master’s degree in accordance with the policy adopted under resolution 1991-30 for

“Professional Growth Recognition.”

5

WHEREAS: Nicole Martin has supplied documentation that she has completed 60% of a

Master’s degree in Health Science Studies.

THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that $2,074.00 be

added to base salary of $43,063.27 to $45,137.27, effective May 2, 2011, in recognition of

completion of 60% of a Master’s degree in accordance with the policy adopted under resolution

1991-30 for “Professional Growth Recognition.”

4. Consideration of Approval of Contracts for Probationary and Non-

Probationary Faculty – R-2011-25

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACTS FOR PROBATIONARY

AND NON-PROBATIONARY FACULTY

R-2011-25

BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that approval is hereby given to the

administration of the college for the “memos of intent” to be issued to the following faculty,

recommended without reservation, for renewal of contracts for the period stated below:

THREE-YEAR NON-PROBATIONARY CONTRACT

(September 2011 through May 2014)

Christina Barker

Jim Beck

Jennifer Phenicie

Michelle Slattery

William Douglas Urban

PROBATIONARY THIRD-YEAR 12-MONTH CONTRACT

(Summer 2011 through Spring 2012)

Ann Davies

PROBATIONARY SECOND-YEAR 12-MONTH CONTRACT

(Summer 2011 through Spring 2012)

Seaneen Sullinger

PROBATIONARY SECOND-YEAR 9-MONTH CONTRACT

(Fall 2011 through Spring 2012)

Daniel Coovert

Steve Edgehouse

Dan McCool

Sara Rollo

Christine Shearer

6

B. Consideration of Approval for Designation of Emeritus Status for Mr. Joseph

Badamy – R-2011-26

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF DESIGNATION

OF EMERITUS STATUS FOR JOSEPH BADAMY

R-2011-26

WHEREAS: in accordance with Board Resolution R-1998-20, and the NCState – NCFA-AAUP

Collective Bargaining Agreement dated December 17, 2008, qualifying retiring faculty members

may be recommended for the designation of Emeritus status, and

WHEREAS: Mr. Joseph Badamy, who after 36 years retired as an Associate Professor of

Computer Information Systems, has met all qualifications, and

WHEREAS: Mr. Joseph Badamy has been nominated for Emeritus status by the regular

bargaining unit faculty of his division and recommended by his Dean and this recommendation

is endorsed by the Vice President for Learning and the President’s Staff.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees, that

Mr. Joseph Badamy is granted Emeritus Status.

ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Mike Carroll moved for approval of resolution R-2011-26

Consideration of Approval of Designation of Emeritus Status for Mr. Joseph Badamy.

Ms. Kimberly Singleton seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.

C. Treasurer’s Report for April 30, 2011 – Ms. Lori McKee

Ms. Lori McKee presented the Treasurer’s Report for the period ending April 30, 2011.

She stated that revenues for the month totaled $596,230. Expenditures were $2,355,275

leaving a deficit of $1,759,046. Year-to-date revenues totaled $18,571,198. Year-to-date

expenditures totaled $16,435,654 leaving an excess of $2,135,544. The Star Ohio month-

end balance for April 2011 is $2,515,507. Ms. McKee noted that the next tuition amount

will be collected in summer quarter.

ACTION TAKEN: Ms. Kimberly Singleton moved for approval of the Treasurer’s

Report for the period ending April 30, 2011. Dr. Dwight McElfresh seconded the motion

and the motion carried unanimously.

VIII. PRESIDENT’S REPORT – Mr. Donald Plotts

A. North Central State College Phi Theta Kappa Update – Ms. Sarah Mendell

Ms. Sarah Mendell was introduced by Beta Theta Eta Chapter Advisor, Ms. Barb Keener.

Ms. Mendell explained her current activity in talking with students and other Phi Theta

Kappa officers about forming a North Central State College Student Council. The council

would consist of PTK members and Non-PTK members representing each of the various

7

program areas. Ms. Mendell also talked about other PTK activities working to develop

scholarships for students.

B. North Central State College Foundation Update – Mr. Donald Plotts

Mr. Donald Plotts provided the following report on Foundation activities.

(1) Rock-n-Ribs 2011 planning is in full swing. Many volunteers are needed to make this

a success. Our volunteer form is on the College website, but College Board members may

use the volunteer forms (Steve Williams distributed to all Board members). Rock-n-Ribs

will be held July 14-16 and features national entertainment acts. A multi-chamber

Business After Hours event will be held July 14, and our popular Donor Reception will

be July 15. (2) Mark your calendar for the June 23 grand announcement that we are

making on the Kehoe third floor renovation project. A media event and donor/community

leader reception will be held, beginning at 5 p.m. The Foundation has received a

gift/pledge of $750,000 for the project's $1.5 million Phase 1. (3) We have bypassed our

goal of $150,000 for our annual fund Emerald Club drive, raising more than $160,000 for

scholarships and events that produce funding for scholarships. (4) The Tech Smart-Health

Sciences Classroom Technology Campaign will kick off in the fall. A planning session

with Health Sciences department leaders will be held in late June. The Foundation hopes

to raise about $1 million on this project. (5) Opening Doors Capital Campaign results:

nearly $4.6 million on the $5.5 million campaign.

C. State Budget Update

President Donald Plotts explained the lack of information from the State at this time but

indicated that President’s of 2-year institutions in Ohio have been lobbying hard with

legislators on budgeting and other funding for Ohio’s community colleges. Among some

of the more important issues before the legislature is allowing community colleges to

take more than a 3.5% tuition increase and how this issue impacts 2-year colleges more

than 4-year institutions.

D. College Budget Presentation – Mr. Donald Plotts / Ms. Lori McKee

President Donald Plotts provided some background information on the budget

development process and other factors that effected the development of this budget

presentation. Then he introduced Ms. Lori McKee to serve as the co-presenter of this

year’s proposal. Following the presentation Ms. McKee discussed some money

saving/revenue generation considerations being made through our affiliation through

campus shared services. Shared services considerations included: shared mental health

services, campus marketing services through NC State, cleaning services through NC

State, postage metering through NC State, a campus student pay to print program, shared

disability services, shared grant writing and an increase in more bachelor of science and

arts degree programs.

E. Supplemental Information

President Donald Plotts asked the Board if they had any questions regarding any of the

supplemental information. The Board responded that they did not.

8

IX. BOARD CHAIRPERSON REPORT- Mr. Steven Stone

A. OSU-M Board Meeting Recap (May 20th ) – Ms. Lydia Reid

Ms. Lydia Reid attended the May 20th

meeting of the OSU-M Board of Trustees and

distributed a written summary of the highlights to include several of the meeting’s

handouts. Highlights included: (1) Dean and Director, Dr. Steven Gavazzi’s offer to

speakout on behalf of the college to public or private gatherings to convey the message

of the university, (2) Considerations for future programming to include a Consumer and

Family Financial Services Major, (3) Topics for the board’s August retreat, (4) Alumni

weekend planned for September 23 and 24, (5) Nomination committee made

recommendations for 2 new board members, (6) Finance committee projections, (7)

Marketing committee’s statewide campaign, (8) Professional writing major

considerations, (9) Semester conversion update, (10) Regional campus cluster advisory

council meeting report.

Mr. Steven Stone called for a representative for the OSU-M June 17th

meeting. No

representative named at this time.

B. OACC Annual Spring Conference – Mr. Steven Stone

Mr. Steven Stone called for a confirmation of those Trustees planning to attend the

OACC Annual Spring Conference, May 26th

and 27th

in Delaware, Ohio. Mr. Steven

Stone, Ms. Edith Humphrey, Mr. Matthew Smith, Ms. Lydia Reid, and Dr. Dwight

McElfresh acknowledged their plans to attend. Ms. Kimberly Singleton indicated that

she would be unable to attend as originally expected.

C. Other

Mr. Steven Stone reminded the Board of college activities for Board involvement that

included the graduate picnic on June 9th

and commencement exercises on June 10th

and

encouraged all Trustees to participate as they are able to demonstrate board support.

Mr. Steven Stone read a letter he received from Mr. Evan Scurti on behalf of the

outstanding data support regional economic development activities were receiving from

Mr. Tom Prendergast. Mr. Stone echoed the Board’s appreciation for the services to the

community put forth by Mr. Prendergast.

X. MEETING EVALUATION – Mr. Steven Stone

Mr. Steve Stone provided a quick recap of the meetings accomplishments and reminded

the trustees to visit the website or respond to the email reminder that would be put out by

the Board Recorder to evaluate this evening’s meeting. Mr. Stone encouraged all trustees

to feel free to contact him directly if they have input on or recommendations towards the

development of next month’s agenda or some other future agenda.

9

XI. TIME AND PLACE OF NEXT MEETING

The next Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees is scheduled for Wednesday, June 22

2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the Fallerius Building Board of Trustees Conference Room.

XII. ADJOURNMENT

The Chair called for any additional business requiring Board action.

ACTION TAKEN: As there was no further business requiring the Board’s

consideration, a motion was made by Dr. Dwight McElfresh to adjourn the meeting at

9:38 p.m. Ms. Edith Humphrey seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.

Respectively submitted:

Mr. Stephen R. Williams, Board Recorder Mr. Steven G. Stone, Chair


EMPLOYMENT OF COLLEGE PERSONNEL

R-2011-27

NEW HIRES

BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that the following faculty member is

hereby awarded an employment agreement at the salary and dates stipulated

below:

BEGINNING JUNE 21, 2011

Bradley Wood, PTA Faculty

Associate of Science, Physical Therapist Assistant

Bachelor of Health Science

SALARY: $39,897 per year based on a 9-month contract

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that the following staff

member is hereby awarded the prescribed salary at the beginning date stipulated

below:

BEGINNING JUNE 20, 2011

Kelly Gray, Director of Nursing

Master of Science, Nursing

Bachelor of Science, Nursing

SALARY: $72,000 per year based on a 1-year contract.

Explanation of new hires

Bradley Wood replaces Anne Bradley.

Kelly Gray replaces Janet Boeckman.

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF TUITION INCREASE

R-2011-28

WHEREAS: the Board of Trustees of North Central State College is committed to

providing access to a high-quality and affordable education, and

WHEREAS: the State Share of Instruction (SSI) allocations for academic years

2011 and 2012 have been lowered due to reduced state revenue projections for the

biennium, and

WHEREAS: the Ohio Board of Regents Chancellor has authorized Ohio public

colleges and universities the option to institute a base tuition increase to offset part

of the reduction in State Share of Instruction, and

WHEREAS: of the date of this action, the Ohio Board of Regents Chancellor has

not set the precise standard of the maximum allowable per credit increase in base

tuitions that institutions may consider.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the Board of Trustees hereby

authorizes the maximum allowable per credit hour increase in base tuition

permitted as in the approved FY 2012-2013 State of Ohio Budget, not to exceed

$90.90 for the 2011-2012 academic year commencing Fall Quarter 2011.


2011-2012 OPERATING BUDGET

R-2011-29

WHERAS: the Board of Trustees of North Central State College has reviewed the

income and expense portion of the proposed 2011-2012 Operating Budget, and

WHEREAS: the Board of Trustees approves the income and allocation of payroll

and non-payroll expenditures of this budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that the

2011-2012 Operating Budget of the College is hereby adopted as presented.

39

Category FY’11 BudgetOriginal

FY’11 BudgetAmended

FY’12 Budget

Payroll $ 11,507,970 $11,507,970 $ 11,011,949

Benefits 4,409,027 4,409,027 4,455,042

Printing 106,150 106,150 117,850

Advertising 213,700 174,200 170,250

Postage 116,000 116,000 108,000

Shared Campus Expense 1,750,000 1,600,000 1,600,000

Professional Development 344,164 344,164 283,584

Grants and Scholarships 321,000 251,000 256,000

Equipment Lease & Rental 180,800 161,375 169,650

New Equipment 206,050 160,300 150,850

Professional Fees 235,910 217,410 228,501

Debt Service 0 1,385 0

All Other Expenses 1,678,880 1,496,630 1,601,637

Child Development Center 64,629 60,929 42,600

Corporate 42,225 32,050 49,050

Facilities 502,900 462,200 437,810

Total Budget $21,679,405 $21,100,790 $20,682,773

40

CategoryFY 2011Original

FY 2011Amended

FY 2012

State Share of Instruction $7,899,785 $7,254,916 $6,820,280

Student Tuition and Fees 11,515,432 10,970,625 11,407,624

Non-Credit Nursing 18,000 6,934 5,000

Other Revenues 497,918 493,293 430,395

University Center 25,000 4,884 15,000

Capital Debt Service 212,000 211,745 201,400

Child Development Center 624,923 544,389 577,148

Workforce/Community Dev. 204,000 95,276 232,300

Facilities 85,000 88,692 61,500

Fund Balance- Wireless Network- Semester Conversion- Operating Expense

268,850 328,497

268,850 1,161,186

10,500 207,329 714,297

Total Budget $21,679,405 $21,100,790 $20,682,773


COLLEGE PERSONNEL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

R-2010-30

BE IT RESOLVED: by the Board of Trustees that the following College

personnel are hereby awarded employment agreements at the salary and dates

stipulated in accordance with the previously approved 2011-2012 budget under

Resolution 2011-29

(See list on following pages)

Supplemental Information

1. Separations Report – June 2011

2. Global ENDS Policy Metrics – Baseline Data

3. Board of Trustees Meeting Dates for 2012

4. Chancellor’s “In Person” Trustee Conference

5. Ohio Senate Budget Talking Points w/ TPP

6. OACC Letter of Support for $200 Tuition Cap

7. OACC Research Report 20110613

SEPARATION REPORT

Report for June 2011

SEPARATIONS

Resignations

Effective June 12, 2011

Jeffrey Janssens, English Faculty

Reason: Personal reasons.


Jennifer Phenicie, Faculty/Program Coordinator, Early Childhood Education

Reason: Pursuing new opportunities.


Seaneen Sullinger, Associate Professor/LPN Faculty

Reason: Moving out of state.

Retirements


Pearl Keib, Associate Professor, Nursing

Pearl served the College for 20 years.

Terminations


Amy Burns, Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy

Reason: Non-renewal.

Ends Policy Metrics for Discussion at June 22 Board Meeting

1.2 Job Readiness – Students prepared for employment success will have the knowledge of

occupational choices, skills, work habits and job leads necessary for economic self-sufficiency.

1.21 – Occupational Choices Completion Percentage. Newly enrolled students who complete a course

exploring occupational/educational choices and goals within the first quarter of enrollment. Baseline

metric for FY 2011: 38%.

Currently, all students who take the First Year Experience course complete an assignment where they

identify a field of study and develop a tentative career plan. Prospective students taking the ABLE

Strategies for Success workshop also complete a career discovery project. Note that FYE is not currently

required for all majors, and will only be required for developmental students after semester conversion.

1.22 Percentage of Programs Completing Annual Program Assessment Reports1. Baseline metric for FY

2010: 40% (8/20).

The annual deadline for academic programs to report their program-level learning outcomes assessment

is 10/15. This activity is facilitated by the College Assessment Committee, with reports posted on the NC

State website under the Student Success Plan. The PAR completion rate was 80% for FY 2009 and 90%

for FY 2008.

1.23 Success Skills Completion Percentage. Percent of students successfully completing a success skills

course. Baseline metric: 0%.

The College has identified the following eight success skills to embed in its programming: accepting

personal responsibility, discovering self-motivation, mastering self-management, employing

interdependence, gaining self-awareness, adopting lifelong learning, developing emotional intelligence

and believing in oneself. While the FYE course currently teaches success skills, it does not focus on these

eight skills. A Strategic Initiative action plan involves revising the course to embed these skills.

1.24a,b Percentage of Academic Technical Programs with Embedded Licensure/Certification, and

Licensure/Certification Pass Percentage. Data is still being collected and will be presented in August.

1.25a Job Search Skills Percentage. Percent of grads developing formal job search skills. Baseline metric

for FY 2011: 39% (169/431).

Five programs in the college embed job search skills development within their curriculum, such as

resume and cover letter development. A Strategic Initiative action plan proposes to have each academic

program create a job search skills development plan unique to their program outcomes, aligned with

support from the Career Development Office.

1 This is a surrogate metric until the college refines and ensures compliance with the Annual Program Outcome

Report.

1.25b Job Network Use by Employers. Number of employers using the College Central Network Services

site. Baseline metric for FY 2011: 317.

College Central Network is a community job matching system for NC State students, alumni and

employers. The 317 employers with active accounts on the system represent 6.3% of all business

establishments in the NC State service area. Employers have posted 378 jobs on the system the past

year, including 21 jobs currently posted within an approximately one-hour commute.

1.3 High Demand/Emerging Technologies – Students are capable of successfully performing in a

variety of roles in business and industry including high demand and emerging technology industry.

1.31 Percentage of Programs Completing Annual Program Assessment Reports (See Above).

1.32 Total High Demand/Emerging Technology Credentials Awarded. Baseline metric for FY 2011: 77

(18% of all degrees/major certificates).

The College defines the following programs as high demand/emerging technology: Associate of Science,

Bioscience Technology, Computer Information Systems (and prior related majors), Digital Arts, Digital

Media Technology, Electronic Engineering Technology, Industrial Technology, and Mechanical

Engineering Technology. The baseline metric represents associate’s degrees and major certificates. This

compared to 52 credentials in FY 2010 and 66 credentials in FY 2009.

1.0 Addition to Global Ends Policy Metrics.

1.0G Number of individuals receiving degrees and major certificates. Baseline metric for FY 2011: 420.

Earlier this year, North Central State College committed to the “College Completion Challenge” of the

AACC/ACCT. The College pledged to producing 50% more students with high quality degrees and

certificates by 2020. In FY 2011, NC State awarded 431 degrees and certificates of at least one year to

420 individuals. Consequently, the College must increase its output of students receiving degrees and

major certificates to 630 by 2020. The College is making improvement in production of major degrees

and certificates. In FY 2010, it issued 383 such credentials to 379 individuals – 11% fewer individuals

than in FY 2011.

Ends Policy Baseline Metrics for May 25th BOT Meeting

1.1 Equal Opportunity/Diversity – The proportion of students from economically or educationally

disadvantaged backgrounds is at least equivalent to the proportion in the local communities.

1.11 Opportunity for Access to NC State

1.11A – 150% Poverty Rate Enrollment Ratio. Total percentage of students whose household income is

150% of poverty over total regional population within 150% of poverty. Baseline metric fall 2007 - 2009:

34.7%/23.0% = 1.51.

This measure represents economically disadvantaged enrollees. The federal “poverty” rate is based on

a sliding scale, which in 2011 represents a $33,525 income level for a family of four. Generally, family

income at 200% of the poverty rate is considered a living wage, and individuals can receive many

supplemental benefits at 150% of the poverty rate such as NC State’s TRiO Student Support Services.

Poverty data from the 2010 Census is still pending. However, data from the US Census Bureau American

Community Survey does estimate poverty for Ashland, Richland and Crawford counties from a 2007 –

2009 average. According to this estimate, 49,002 persons within these counties subsist at 150% of the

poverty level, or 23.0% of residents for whom poverty status is determined. It is likely this number will

increase in the 2010 Census as the ACS average covers only part of the recession period.

As a baseline ratio, we have examined financial aid data of entering fall students from 2007 – 2009. This

included combining the incomes of dependent students with their parents to compute money income. A

three-year average shows that 34.7% of these students filing FASFA forms were within 150% of poverty.

1.11B – First Generation Enrollment Comparison Ratio. The percentage of NC State students for who

neither parent completed any college over the “first-generation” percentage of Ohio’s co-located

technical colleges. Baseline metric fall 2009: 67.32%/66.87% = 1.01.

While the Census Bureau measures educational attainment, it does not survey respondents on their

parent’s education. Consequently, we compared the concentration of first-generation enrollees for fall

2009 with that of Ohio’s other co-located technical colleges. According to the Census Bureau, NC State’s

region has a nearly identical percentage of adults who have not completed college as compared to the

peer college region (76%).

1.12 Successful Completion at NC State

1.12A – 150% Poverty Rate Completion Ratio. Total percentage of entering fall cohort students who are

low income that complete a major credential within three/six years of initial enrollment. Baseline low-

income metric: three-year completion rate of 9.1% for 2007 cohort and six-year completion rate of

13.3% for 2004 cohort.

This represents a subset of the completion percentage reported in the Global Ends Policy metrics. The

three-year completion rate for all 2007 cohort students was 11.8% and six-year completion rate for the

2004 cohort was 19.0%.

1.12B – First Generation Retention Ratio (Temporary surrogate for completion) – Baseline Metric: Fall-

to-fall retention of 49% for 2009 first generation cohort students compared to 45% for non-first

generation students from the cohort.

It appears that data on first-generation status for the 2004 and 2007 cohorts was not migrated over

during the college information system conversion. While we determine the feasibility for obtaining this

data from the old system, we are producing a surrogate metric showing fall-to-fall retention of first-

generation students in the 2009 cohort.

1.5 Transferability – Students prepared for advanced academic success will have the ability and

prerequisite academic experience sufficient for entry into a four-year college or university.

1.51 Non-graduate Transfer Percentage – Reflects students earning at least 18 college-level credits at NC

State who then enroll at a four-year institution within one year of leaving NC State. Results are based on

transfer results for entering fall cohorts at three and six years. 1 Baseline metric: third-year transfer rate

for 2007 cohort is 4.1%, and sixth-year transfer rate for the 2004 cohort is 4.4%.

1.52 Graduate Transfer Percentage – Reflects associate degree graduates in the spring term who then

enroll within a year at a four-year institution. Baseline metric: Of the 245 graduates in spring 2010,

18.4% transferred to a four-year institution within the year.

The most common cohort transfer destinations for spring 2010 graduates were: The Ohio State

University (eight), Ohio University (seven), Franklin University (five), Mount Vernon Nazarene University

(four) and University of Akron (four). The most common NC State programs experiencing graduate

transfer were: Technical Studies including CollegeNow (11), Criminal Justice (seven), Registered Nursing

(6) and Accounting (five).

1 Reflects cohort students that had transferred to a 4-year institution within the third or sixth year (and were not

co-enrolled at NC State during that time). This metric is also one of the Global Ends Policy metrics.

Global Ends Policy Metrics – Baseline Data

I. Success percentages. These metrics are based off of students entering NC State for the first time

during either fall 2004 or fall 2007 (except high school students). It is important to remember these

cohort figures represent a snapshot in time – success measures during either the third or sixth year since

enrollment – for uniform comparison.

A. 3- & 6-Year Completion Percentage. Cohort students who completed a major credential (certificate

of at least one year) within three/six years of initial enrollment. 1

B. 3- & 6-Year Continuing Percentage. Cohort students that had not graduated within three/six years,

but were enrolled at NC State at least one term of the third/sixth year. 2

C. 3- & 6-Year Transfer Percentage. Cohort students that had neither graduated by nor persisted within

three years, but had transferred to a 4-year institution within the third/sixth year. Based on national

research, the students must have earned at least 18 college-level credits at NC State to be counted

for this measure.3

The following charts show success measures for the 2004 cohort (733 students) and 2007 cohort (694

students).

The data shows improvement in the completion measures when comparing the 2004 and 2007 cohorts

three years after initial enrollment. Note the 2007 cohort fully benefitted from Achieving the Dream

interventions first implemented in 2006-07. Within six years, the success measures for the 2004 cohort

have also improved – including a completion percentage which more than doubled.

1 Achieving the Dream’s methodology for calculating completion rates captures all credential completions, including minor certificates of less than a year. After consulting with President’s Staff, we believe that reporting only major certificates and degrees more accurately reflects completion. In reality, only four students from the 2004 cohort and three from the 2007 cohort completed minor certificates alone. 2 Achieving the Dream’s methodology for calculating retention combines retained and graduated students. The Ends Policy metric does not include students who have already earned a major credential. 3 From Core Indicators of Effectiveness for Community Colleges, by Jeffrey Seybert.

Completion Continuing Transfer

2004 Cohort 9.0% 28.5% 3.7%

2007 Cohort 11.8% 27.8% 4.1%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0% 3-Year Success Measures, 2004 and 2007 Cohorts

Completion Continuing Transfer

2004 Cohort 19.0% 7.5% 4.4%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0% 6-Year Success Measures, 2004 Cohort

II. Enrollment. This metric reflects annualized unique headcount for credit students.

Annualized headcount has grown 16.4% in the decade from FY 2001 to 2011 – an average pace of

1.6% per year. This growth occurred at the same time population age 16-64 of the three-county

service area dropped 3.5%.

III. Graduate Satisfaction Index. This metric gauges graduate satisfaction by creating a weighted

average of two key questions from the annual graduate follow-up survey. The benchmark responses

below are from the 2008/09 survey given low response rates to the 2009/10 survey. The Career

Services Department is implementing steps to enhance responses to the 2010/11 survey.

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003

FY 2004

FY 2005

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

HC 4,259 4,571 4,844 4,806 4,729 4,495 4,514 4,567 4,749 5,031 4,959

3,800

4,000

4,200

4,400

4,600

4,800

5,000

5,200Annualized Unduplicated Headcount

67%

25%

8% 0%

How well did NC State courses prepare you for transfer? 24 responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

30%

34%

26%

6% 4%

What is your overall rating of the education you received as it relates to the requirements

of your job? 80 responses

Very High

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Very Low

To create an index score, a 1-4 Likerd scale would be assumed for each question. For the education

rating question, the two lowest categories are combined. Consequently, the average score for the

transfer question is 3.58 while the average score for education rating is 2.89. Since three times as many

graduates responded to the education rating question, the average score is multiplied by three (8.63).

The average transfer rating is added to this number, and then divided by four for a total weighted score

of 3.05.

IV. Employer Satisfaction Index. This metric will gauge employer satisfaction of recent NC State

graduates. The Institutional Research, Career Services and Workforce Development departments are

collaborating on a new employer survey from which this index will be created (see draft). They are

coordinating with academic departments such as health science to avoid employer survey duplication

while ensuring key index questions are uniformly asked. We intend to preview this survey with key

business audiences before distributing this summer to obtain baseline data.

V. Program & Service Review Percentage. This metric will track the percentage of eligible academic

programs and support services reviewed through the Institutional Review Committee being piloted in FY

2011-12. The Action Plan proposes the submission of two academic program and two service area

quality improvement reports by June 1, 2012. The college has set a long-term goal of reviewing all

programs and eligible services on a four-year cycle. Once this cycle is underway, we anticipate

converting this metric to track compliance with implementing Committee recommendations.

BOARD OF TRUSTEE MEETING DATES

2012 All meetings will be held at NC State Main Campus

Fallerius Technical Building Board Room (149) unless otherwise announced

7:00 pm

January 11, 2012

February 22, 2012*

March 28, 2012

April 25, 2012

May 23, 2012

June 27, 2012

August 22, 2012

September 26, 2012

October 24, 2012

December 5, 2012

NOTE: No regular meetings scheduled for July and November.

* - We will discussion omitting the February meeting

January

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30 31

February

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29

March

S M T W T F S

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

April

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

May

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31

June

S M T W T F S

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26 27 28 29 30

July

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30 31

August

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31

September

S M T W T F S

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30

October

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30 31

November

S M T W T F S

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30

December

S M T W T F S

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

2012

Steve Williams - Invite 2011 Statewide Trustee Conference

Dear Trustee; I am writing as a follow-up to the Save the Date notice regarding the University System of Ohio’s statewide Trustee Conference, which will be held on Thursday August 11. Please accept this letter as your official invitation to attend the conference at the Fawcett Center on the campus of The Ohio State University. The Fawcett Center is located at 2400 Olentangy River Road in Columbus, 43210. For your convenience, a conference registration website has been created and can be accessed at www.ohioacte.org/events?eventId=325507&EventViewMode=EventDetails.

The conference will present trustees with an opportunity to interact with our Board of Regents members, management and staff, and discuss the goals and strategies of the University System. Priority initiatives and themes will be detailed, including the plan for the establishment of the “Enterprise University System”. We also will present ideas on how we will foster interaction with our college and university trustees going forward. Among the other themes to be featured at the conference are the importance of having effective and streamlined technology transfer and commercialization strategies. Best practices from across the state will be highlighted with panelists discussing methods for how to best move research from ideas and publications to products that are manufactured and can create jobs. This conversation will focus on how to best align research with industry needs, create more startup companies, interact with industry at the “speed of business,” and promote an entrepreneurial culture on campus. At the request of trustees through institutional surveys, the conference will also feature a session on exploring the fiduciary responsibilities of trustees. A final conference agenda will be available in the coming weeks. I am very excited about the opportunity to share ideas, answer your questions and receive your input. Trustees play a vitally important role in ensuring the success of our great institutions of higher education. Events like the statewide Trustee Conference provide opportunities for us to work together and learn from each other ways to improve our institutions and our state. Please make every effort to attend the conference.

Any questions regarding the conference can be directed to Charles See, at [email protected] or by phone at (614) 728-2663. I look forward to seeing you on August 11th.

Sincerely,

Jim Petro

From: Charles See <[email protected]>To:

Dwight McElfresh <[email protected]>, Edith Humphrey <[email protected]>, Kimberly Singleton, Lydia Reid <[email protected]>,Matthew Smith <[email protected]>, Mehdi Ressallat <[email protected]>, Mike Carroll <[email protected]>, Steve Williams <[email protected]>, Steven Stone <[email protected]>

Date: 6/20/2011 3:01 PMSubject: Invite 2011 Statewide Trustee Conference

Page 1 of 2

6/20/2011file://C:\Documents and Settings\swilliam\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4DFF60E0NC...

Chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents University System of Ohio

Page 2 of 2

6/20/2011file://C:\Documents and Settings\swilliam\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4DFF60E0NC...

175 South Third Street Suite 560 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Office: 614-221-OACC (6222) Fax: 614-221-6239 www.ohiocc.org

WWhhyy tthhee NNeeeedd ffoorr TTuuiittiioonn FFlleexxiibbiilliittyy??

There is Historic Demand for Community College Programs and Services:

Community Colleges have experienced unprecedented levels of enrollment growth over the last 10 years. Since FY 2000 enrollment has grown by over 80%, placing a tremendous amount of pressure on Community Colleges’ programs and services.

State support per full-time equivalent (FTE) student since FY 2000 (adjusted for inflation) has declined by almost 40%. At the same time, tuition per student on a real dollar basis has only increased by approximately 15%, and expenditures have declined by 20%.

Community Colleges are also enrolling a greater percentage of less prepared “at risk” students who require additional counseling and other intervention services, further straining our declining resources.

These funding dynamics are placing tremendous pressure on Ohio’s Community Colleges at a time when displaced workers are coming to us for job assistance and more Ohioans are seeking credentials that will propel them into living wage jobs.

How State Support is Impacting the Numbers:

Ohio is 45th in the nation for state support for higher education. In other words, we are 5th from last.

Ohio is in the bottom 5 nationally for state funding per FTE, along with Indiana, Montana, New Hampshire, and Vermont.

As a result of lags in state funding, Ohio’s institutions of higher education have relied on a greater share of tuition for funding than the national average. Even with this, we still rank 10% below the national average in total educational revenue per FTE (this includes both tuition and state appropriations dollars).

For every $1000 in personal taxable income, Ohio spends $6.37 on higher education which is almost $1.00 below the national average of $7.35.

OACC

Community Colleges are Doing More with Less and Maximizing Efficiencies:

Due to the higher relative enrollment growth experienced by Community Colleges in comparison to the University sector, the change in state share of instruction (SSI) per FTE student over the past four years has been significantly unequal as shown in the chart below:

SSI relative to FTE has declined by 14% for Community Colleges, while SSI for universities has risen by 6%. This has been the case despite the fact that the cost of doing business is the same for both sectors.

Despite declines in state funding, Community Colleges have achieved substantial efficiencies via individual and collaborative initiatives and economies of scale. Community Colleges saved over $28 million in FY08, over $42 million in FY09, over $45 million in FY10, and over $41 million in FY11. Some of these cost saving measures included:

o Freezing salaries and benefits or reducing the number of months between merit salary increases

o Increasing employees’ share of contributions toward healthcare benefits o Eliminating and consolidating non-faculty positions and reducing salaries for incoming

staff o Reducing part-time hours o Continuing to offer ‘partial year’ (a number of weeks unpaid) employment options o Reducing energy consumption through energy programs and lower negotiated gas and

electric rates o Participating in group purchasing and consortium buying o Implementing cash separation/retirement agreements with employees

$3,499

$2,997

$(502)

$5,462 $5,766

$304

$(1,000)

$-

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

FY 2007 Actual FY 2011 Projected Change

2-Year Sector

4-Year Sector

State Share of Instruction (SSI) Per Subsidy Eligible FTE Student

-14%

+6%

OACC

For several years, including the last biennium, many Community Colleges voluntarily froze tuition or did not maximize the tuition cap, as reflected in the grid below.

* Owens’ FY10 and FY11 tuition figures are based on 12 semester credit hours.

Yellow – Tuition was frozen

Blue – Tuition decreased

Tuition at Ohio’s Community Colleges increased an average of $202 across five years (FY 2007 – FY 2011).

Based on this average, Tuition at Ohio’s Community Colleges has increased an average of $40.40 or 1.2% a year since FY 2007.

Campus Name FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 $ Difference FY07-FY11

Belmont 3,784 3,784 3,784 3,784 3,908 124

Central Ohio 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,684 3,852 252

Cincinnati State 3,867 3,867 3,867 3,909 4,124 257

Clark State 3,485 3,485 3,485 3,566 3,732 247

Columbus State 3,555 3,555 3,555 3,638 3,679 124

Cuyahoga 2,416 2,416 2,416 2,416 2,537 121

Eastern Gateway 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,790 90

Edison State 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,570 3,690 240

Hocking 3,546 3,546 3,546 3,669 3,795 249

Lakeland 2,697 2,697 2,726 2,819 2,916 219

Lorain 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,483 2,569 169

Marion 3,660 3,660 3,660 3,716 3,876 216

North Central 3,634 3,634 3,634 3,719 3,893 259

Northwest State 3,870 4,080 4,140 3,990 3,990 120

*Owens State 2,972 2,972 2,972 3,076 3,184 212

Rhodes State 4,229 4,229 4,229 4,229 4,313 84

Rio Grande 3,482 3,482 3,520 3,610 3,740 258

Sinclair 2,025 2,025 2,025 2,072 2,259 234

Southern State 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,633 243

Stark State 3,810 3,810 3,810 3,874 4,073 263

Terra State 3,590 3,590 3,610 3,735 3,865 275

Washington State 3,555 3,555 3,555 3,638 3,807 252

Zane State 3,825 3,825 3,825 3,915 3,960 135

AVERAGE: $202

OACC

Some Community Colleges are Affected by the Accelerated Phase Out of the Tangible Personal Property Tax:

The proposed accelerated phase out of the tangible personal property tax (TPP) and utility payments for levy schools will result in a collective reduction in revenues of over $45 million versus the current phase-out schedules. In addition, some levy schools are being impacted by reductions in property valuations and foreclosures. For instance it is noted that during the next biennium:

o Sinclair Community College is projecting a $5 million or 15% abrupt loss of levy revenue due to the accelerated phase out of TPP and anticipated reductions in property values.

o Cuyahoga Community College is projecting a loss of nearly $26 million in FY 12/13, or nearly 12.6%, of its levy revenue as a result of the proposed accelerated phase-out of TPP, anticipated reductions in property values, and growing delinquency rates.

o Lakeland Community College is projecting a $1.2 million, or 6% abrupt loss of levy revenue solely due to the accelerated phase-out of reimbursements for the TPP of both general business and public utilities.

o Eastern Gateway Community College is projecting a 17% additional loss of levy revenue for FY 12 and a 23% additional loss of levy revenue for FY 13 due to the proposed accelerated phase out of TPP and utility payments. The total estimated loss of funds to the college is $804,000 over the next six years.

o Lorain County Community College is projecting a $1 million or 10% annual loss of local levy revenue due to the accelerated phase out of TPP.

o Rio Grande Community College is anticipating a 12% loss in levy revenue due to the accelerated phase out of TPP.

The Community College Sector is Simply Advocating for Fairness

As the lowest cost sector of higher education in Ohio, a 3.5% cap results in a disparity of actual dollars for Community College’s - $81 annualized per student at the lowest tuition rate vs. $151 dollars at the highest - disproportionately constraining Community Colleges’ ability to respond to current budgetary challenges.

As the lowest cost sector of higher education in Ohio, for Community Colleges, a 3.5% tuition increase equates to an average of $126, while regional campuses and universities will receive an average of $195 and $300, respectively.

OACC

Even with a $200 increase, Community Colleges would still be the lowest cost option in the University System of Ohio. $200 would be an average increase of $6.67 per credit hour for a full-time student.

The $200 cap would provide necessary flexibility to modestly recalibrate tuition rates for long-term fiscal sustainability given prolonged declines in state funding and other revenue sources such as the phase out of TPP (The accelerated phase out of TPP impacts six of Ohio’s Community Colleges).

In-County Annualized Tuition

Impact of 3.5% Tuition Cap

Community Colleges $3,600 $126

Universities $8,576 $300

DIFFERENCE - $4,976 - $174

June 16, 2011

The Honorable Ron Amstutz

Ohio House of Representatives

Riffe Center, 13th

Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Re: Letter of Support for Community Colleges’ $200 Tuition Cap

Dear Chairman Amstutz et al:

I write today on behalf of Ohio’s 23 community colleges to urge your support for the

$200 tuition cap on community colleges included in the Senate’s version of House Bill 153.

The Ohio Association of Community Colleges (OACC) believes the Senate acted

responsibly in recognizing the distinctions that exist between the funding models of Ohio’s

community colleges and other sectors of higher education. Maintaining those distinctions in both

State Share of Instruction (SSI) funding and tuition cap flexibility is essential to the longevity of

Ohio’s community colleges.

As many of our member colleges have shared with you and your colleagues throughout

the budget process, Ohio’s community colleges are bumping up against significant challenges as

a result of state funding that has historically inadequately kept pace with enrollment growth, as

well as more recent factors such as the accelerated phase out of the Tangible Personal Property

Tax and declining property values that further depress the revenue streams of levy colleges.

The unprecedented demand for Ohio’s community colleges as validated by the influx of

both non-traditional students and displaced workers into our classrooms over the past several

years has created a tremendous demand for community colleges’ programs and services to

provide both remediation and support to help these students succeed and join or rejoin Ohio’s

workforce. Community colleges are committed to responding to this call to action and are asking

you and the rest of the General Assembly for the necessary tools to adequately meet the demands

of our students who will in turn provide the trained workforce that Ohio’s employers so

desperately need.

As the OACC has explained in meetings with various legislators and policy staff over the

past month, a $200 tuition cap will provide much needed flexibility to Ohio’s community

colleges that are at various ends of the tuition spectrum. Some colleges will not need the tuition

increase. In fact, several of our colleges have publicly announced that they will maintain a flat

tuition this coming academic year. However, for those colleges that have voluntarily held the line

on raising tuition during Ohio’s recession and in years when they could afford to do so, a $200

tuition cap appropriately recognizes their efforts to consider the financial needs of their students

by providing these colleges latitude for fiscal recalibration.

In closing, the OACC would like to thank you for listening to our thoughts and concerns

throughout this budget process. In an effort to provide you with a bit more information related to

our $200 tuition cap, I have included a supplemental piece for your review. If you have

additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of my staff.

Sincerely,

Dr. Ron Abrams

President

Ohio Association of Community Colleges

cc: The Honorable Chris Widener

The Honorable John Carey

The Honorable Shannon Jones

The Honorable Vernon Sykes

The Honorable Michael Skindell

June 2011

Prepared By

Ohio's Community Colleges:Creating Pathways to Prosperity

Table of Contents

Section Page(s)

OACC and the Center for Development .......................................................................... 1

Introduction to this Report..................................................................................................... 1-2

Ohio's Workforce Outlook ..................................................................................................... 3

The Cost to Ohio of Doing Nothing ..................................................................................... 3-4

Ohio’s Industry Workforce Competitiveness Objectives.................................................. 4

Setting a Bold Goal for Ohio ................................................................................................. 4

Ohio’s Two-Year System Benefits ......................................................................................... 5

OACC's Role in Powering Ohio's Success ........................................................................... 5-6

Ohio's Workforce Competitiveness Challenges ................................................................ 6-15

What are Ohio's ROI Indicators for Improving Workforce Competitiveness? What are the Current Roles of Ohio's Community Colleges in Workforce

Development? What Do Ohio’s Companies Need to Compete? How Does Ohio Create Sustainable Performance? What are the Economic and Workforce Conditions of the United States? What is the Evolution of the Unskilled to Skilled Workforce in the United

States? How Do Ohio's Educational Levels Compare to the National Averages? What is Ohio's Population Age Distribution? What are Ohio's PK-12 Enrollment Levels? What Does Ohio Expend Annually in Payroll? What Industries Employ Ohio's Citizens? What are the Sizes of Ohio's Employers?

1


OACC and the Center for Development OACC The trustees, presidents and staff of the Ohio Association of Community Colleges (OACC) are dedicated to the advancement and implementation of sound policy and initiatives that work to ensure the success of the more than 300,000 community college students in Ohio. Rooted in the belief that every person should have access to a high-quality college education, OACC supports the mission of the state's 23 community colleges in offering our local communities technical, developmental and continuing education programming in addition to the opportunity to complete the first two years of a bachelor's degree. To that end, OACC exists to advocate for Ohio’s community colleges, as well as serve as a resource for its member institutions. OACC provides leadership to develop and execute strategic direction for Ohio’s community and technical colleges, represents its member colleges at the state and national levels, promotes the benefits of community colleges to the residents of Ohio, provides opportunities for trustee development and facilitates the exchange of ideas and information. The OACC Center for Development The OACC Center for Development (Center) serves in a complementary role to OACC to provide funding resources, services and support for Ohio’s community colleges as well as serves as a resource for its member institutions. To increase the competitive performance of Ohio’s workforce, the Center facilitates and coordinates collaboration in statewide and regional initiatives to:

Increase awareness opportunities, excellence and impact for Ohio's community colleges

Enhance alignment and partnering among industry, educators and community organizations

Develop resources to create, scale and sustain new ideas and innovation

Introduction to this Report The data and information in this report were provided at the OACC Annual Conference in May 2011 during the presentation, Ohio's Workforce--Getting to 60%, by Robert LePage, Senior Vice President of Workforce Development Services at the Clements Group, L.C. This report is a step in identifying needs and opportunities for Ohio’s

2


community colleges and defining the role that the Center will play in facilitating and coordinating collaboration in statewide and regional initiatives to:

Secure Resources for Statewide and Collaborative Initiatives Secure funds to promote additional member’s adoption of currently successful strong results-driven workforce and student success initiatives in place at other community colleges in Ohio and other states.

Engage in Strategic Partnerships Enhance Ohio community colleges' outreach to corporate, government and community leaders through direct engagement in order to confirm strategic workforce strategies, increase alignment and launch new partnerships.

Find and Scale Effective Programs

To drive Ohio’s student and workforce success, create further collaboration among the membership, community-based organizations, government agencies and educators to identify and define new ideas, construct innovative programs and secure funding to develop plans and test, pilot and scale them for statewide impact.

Expand the Resource Development Capacity of Foundations Advance the growth and success of Ohio’s community colleges through the expansion of their foundations' capacity to secure resources from individuals, corporations, foundations, grants and contracts and through the development of entrepreneurial partnerships.

Facilitate a Culture of Philanthropy

Champion the success of Ohio’s community colleges by celebrating our students, faculty, staff and programs locally, statewide and nationally, in addition to stimulating continued innovation and excellence through the provision of professional resources, the creation and distribution of information and the bestowing of recognition awards.

Increase Awareness of Ohio’s Community Colleges Create awareness and capture advocacy by providing members new data sources and tools to promote the value and impact of Ohio’s community colleges as the catalysts to build the educated workforce required in each community to drive economic development.

3


Ohio's Workforce Outlook Since their beginning almost five decades ago, Ohio’s community colleges have strived to provide citizens the knowledge and tools to build careers in our state. Serving more than 300,000 students today, Ohio's community colleges play a key role in educating and training the workforce our state needs to revitalize the economy and attract new business. As drivers of the state’s workforce and economic development efforts, Ohio’s community colleges must continue to play an active role to assist regional business and industry to recruit, train and retain the kind of highly-skilled workforce required to compete in increasingly complex and competitive markets. Enhanced workforce development efforts are particularly crucial for the region’s high-growth occupations and anchor industries essential to Ohio’s prosperity. Our colleges must continue to develop additional capacity and new capabilities to enhance program offerings and further our success in supporting students to become high-qualified and high-performance workers to power our state’s economic competitiveness. It is clear that in today’s rapidly evolving global economy, keeping pace with changing needs and providing relevant programs and services are essential for Ohio’s continued economic success. With additional support from the community, Ohio’s community colleges can take the necessary steps to provide students with innovative industry standard learning opportunities; defined pathways of support to careers; new programs aligned to the emerging needs of industry and our communities; and the education that will result in a better quality of life for Ohio’s citizens.

The Cost to Ohio of Doing Nothing The cost to Ohio of not addressing these critical workforce needs include:

Higher costs and lower productivity, putting Ohio's companies at competitive disadvantage globally

The shift of current Ohio companies’ growth opportunities to other states

Constricted growth potential for Ohio's small and mid-sized companies

The loss of prospective companies to neighboring states with stronger workforces

A rise in employee turnover and recruitment expenditures

A rise in employee orientation timelines and training expenditures

A rise in employee salary, benefits and health care costs

4


The loss of young talent and potential future community leaders as they seek stronger long-term career prospects elsewhere

Ohio's Industry Workforce Competitiveness Objectives Adopting strategies to significantly improve the workforce competitiveness of Ohio’s employers will result in:

Improved overall employee productivity

Effective utilization of equipment and technology

Reduced orientation time of new employees

Decreased recruitment expenditures

Shortened vacancy placement cycle times

Enhanced employee retention rates

Availability of sufficient candidate pool to address projected baby-boomer retirements

Increased fiscal performance and profitability

Setting a Bold Goal for Ohio Over the next decade, Ohio’s community colleges face the imperative of driving the economic success of the state by providing business and industry the critical number of high-performance graduates with market-driven workforce credentials (certificate, degree, diploma) that include the knowledge and skills required to compete in a global economy. For Ohio to be nationally and globally competitive by 2020, we must achieve the bold goal of doubling the number of Ohioans completing a credential or degree, or transferring to a four-year institution.

At a time when the state’s community colleges are being summoned to accelerate their growing role in improving Ohio’s current workforce, as well as developing a new generation of workers to enable employers to compete in a global economy, they are also facing growing cuts in state and federal support and funding. Achieving this bold goal will require the commitment of Ohio’s community colleges and OACC to further engage, collaborate, innovate and develop new ideas that can be scaled for statewide impact.

5


Ohio’s Two-Year System Benefits

Ohio’s 23 community colleges provide highly valuable benefits to students, citizens, industries and communities in driving workforce performance, economic development and quality of life for the state.

Academic excellence

Quality faculty and staff

Affordable cost

Classes close to home

Variety of programs

Outstanding support services

Personal

State-of-the-art

Caring environment

Small classes

Collegiate

Ability to transfer credits

OACC's Role in Powering Ohio's Success OACC plays a critical role in powering Ohio's success through its work in supporting Ohio’s community colleges, including:

Increasing Community College Student Success OACC believes that every community college student is capable of achieving his/her educational aspirations; however, there are many challenges preventing both students and colleges from making this a reality. OACC is committed to explicitly focusing on improving student retention and student success outcomes for students in all demographic and academic preparedness categories.

Ensuring College Access and Affordability OACC is committed to ensuring that a community college education is accessible and affordable to students throughout Ohio.

Ensuring Program and Service Quality OACC is committed to ensuring the highest standards of program and service quality, and ensuring this quality is recognized both within the University System of

6


Ohio and externally. This is a commitment ingrained in all OACC’s policy priorities.

Supporting Community College Infrastructure OACC is committed to the support of effective, efficient, well-maintained infrastructure which meets the industry standards students will encounter in the workforce.

Increasing Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Community College System OACC is committed to the promotion and advancement of operational and academic efficiency and effectiveness within both the University System of Ohio and Ohio’s community colleges.

Advancing Workforce Development Workforce development is an important component of the community college mission, and OACC is committed to advancing state and federal policies which assist community colleges in meeting the workforce education and training needs of Ohio’s employers and workers.

Preparing Students for Transfer Preparing students for transfer to four-year institutions is another important component of the community college mission, and OACC is committed to advancing systemic alignment policies which ease students’ transfer pathways to achieve their highest educational aspirations.

Ohio's Workforce Competitiveness Challenges What are Ohio's ROI Indicators for Improving Workforce Competitiveness?

Employers Access to qualified workers

Increased productivity

Reduced recruitment costs and turnover

Shortened new employee orientation times and reduced expenditures

Ability to promote from pool of loyal employees

Access to skill upgrading for incumbent workers

Community Alignment of economic development vision and workforce advancement

Enhanced labor pool to retain and attract employers

April 7, 2011

7


Increased income levels in the community

Reduced poverty, crime and support costs

Education System Increased number of students earning credentials and degrees

Enhanced student engagement

Reduced dropout rates

Reduced remedial course enrollment

Increased number of students going on to college

Policy Makers Increased impact of funded programs

Improved outcomes based on growth of society

Drives economic and quality-of-life success What are the Current Roles of Ohio's Community Colleges in Workforce Development? The current roles of Ohio's community colleges in workforce development include:

Workforce credentials (certificate, diploma, degree)

Continued education (credit)

Customized corporate training

Professional licensure preparation and exams

Continuing education units

Literacy and adult basic education

Workforce assessment

Career services

Experiential learning

What Do Ohio’s Companies Need to Compete? To compete in the 21st century global economy Ohio’s companies must have:

Access to a qualified workforce Ability to innovate, add new value and respond quickly

8


Ability to develop and deploy technology Ability to acquire and absorb information Ability to manage people and change Access to capital

How Does Ohio Create Sustainable Performance

State leaders must undertake aligned actions to foster a culture of innovation, collaboration and coordination of resources to build sustainable success in:

Economic Development

To promote sustainable economic development, Ohio must focus on providing specialized support that meets the recruitment, development and retention needs for small, mid-size and large employers in the region.

Workforce Development To ensure operational success at all levels of the various organizations, Ohio’s Community Colleges must work proactively with business and industry to focus on improving the effectiveness of their human resources.

What are the Economic and Workforce Conditions of the United States?

The great global recession

Growing global competition

Increasing demand for a highly-educated workforce

Lack of college readiness among high school graduates

High number of under or unemployed working age adults

Aging workforce and severe shortages in key occupations

Lack of degree/credential attainment of our citizens

Undereducated workforce

Low population growth

Flight of business and industry to other countries

9


What is the Evolution of the Unskilled to Skilled Workforce in the United States? Unskilled jobs of the past are being replaced by mid-skill jobs that require stronger foundation skills, higher technical knowledge, critical thinking and problem solving. Changing Skill Requirements for Employability How Do Ohio's Educational Levels Compare to the National Averages? Ohio's Educational Attainment Performance

In just ten years, more than 60% of all new jobs will require a college education. Will Ohio be ready? Good family incomes and the health of state economies depend on more of our young people succeeding in college.

According to the US Census Bureau, Ohio's educational attainment of an associate's degree or more is 31%, which is slightly less than the national average of 35%. Nationally, 50% of individuals attain less than an associate's degree, while in Ohio 56% of individuals attain less than an associate's degree.

36% of Ohio's young adults (ages 25-34) have college degrees.

10


Attainment Levels Ohio US

Less than 9th Grade 4% 6% 9th to 12 Grade, No Diploma 10% 9% High School Graduate (or GED) 36% 29% Some College, No Degree 20% 20% Associate's Degree 7% 7% Bachelor's Degree 15% 17% Graduate or Professional Degree 9% 10%

Unemployment and Educational Attainment According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there was an average of 595,500 unemployed Ohioans in 2010 and 5,303,000 employed. Of those unemployed:

15% have less than a high

school diploma

11% are high school graduates with no college

8% have some college or an associate's degree

4% have a bachelor's degree or higher

To reduce the impact of unemployment on families, communities and Ohio new strategies and levels of partnering will need to be undertaken to create systematic steps to convert the unskilled workforce to a pool of sought-after mid-skilled employee candidates for business and industry.

11


Relationship Between Educational Attainment and Earning Potential According to the National Education Longitudinal Study (2000) conducted by The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, individuals' earning potential depends on the interaction between their levels of education and their occupations. What is Ohio's Population Age Distribution? It is important to note Ohio's population age distribution as we prepare to face the retirement of the baby-boomer generation from the workforce.

12


What are Ohio's PK-12 Enrollment Levels? Over the next decade, even with significant improvement in high school graduation rates (83-85% recently) and college readiness levels, Ohio’s PK-12 enrollment of 1.9 million students will not produce a sufficient supply of people to enroll and obtain the college credentials necessary to build the workforce required to drive Ohio’s economic prosperity.

13


What Does Ohio Expend Annually In Payroll?

14


What Industries Employ Ohio's Citizens?

15


What are the Sizes of Ohio's Employers?

NOTES _____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

January

S M T W T F S

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

February

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28

March

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31

April

S M T W T F S

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26 27 28 29 30

May

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30 31

June

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30

July

S M T W T F S

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26 27 28 29 30

31

August

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30 31

September

S M T W T F S

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30

October

S M T W T F S

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

November

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30

December

S M T W T F S

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2011