jury management indices report - florida courts...jul-sep 2009 oct-dec 2009 jan-mar 2010 apr-jun...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Jury Management Indices Report
Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data cannot be confirmed by OSCA staff.
The Jury Management indices were developed to monitor jury systems performance in the local trial courts. Consistently poor performance on one or more of the indices may indicate the need to review and conceivably change procedures. Often, however, the indices are not sufficient to isolate the specific problem or suggest alternative or modifications that will improve performance. The following are definitions of the indices used in this report. SUMMONING YIELD A comparison of the number of jurors who are available to serve on the first day of the term of service to the number of prospective jurors summoned for the term. The Summoning Yield percentage is calculated by dividing the total number of prospective jurors available to serve by the total number of jurors summoned. The Florida Supreme Court goal for the Summoning Yield index is forty percent (40%) or more. JUROR DAYS PER TRIAL (JDPT) The average number of days a juror is needed for each trial. JDPT is calculated by dividing the sum of jurors reporting daily and carry-overs by the total number of jury trials (six-person + twelve-person). The Florida Supreme Court goal for the JDPT is 30.5 or less. PEOPLE BROUGHT IN PER TRIAL (PBI) The average number of prospective jurors needed to start a trial. PBI is calculated by dividing the total number of jurors reporting daily by the total number of jury trials (six-person + twelve-person). The Florida Supreme Court goal for the PBI is 18.3 or less for a "typical" six-person trial and 30.5 or less for a “typical” twelve-person trial. PERCENT TO VOIR DIRE The percentage of prospective jurors that undergo questioning by counsel for a specific trial. The percentage is calculated by dividing the total number of persons sent to voir dire by the total number of jurors reporting daily. The Florida Supreme Court goal for Percent to Voir Dire is 100% or more. AVERAGE PANEL SIZE The average number of prospective jurors selected from the pool and sent to voir dire for the empanelment of one jury. In Florida, there are standard panel sizes for all trials. These standard panel sizes are set by administrative order of the Chief Justice. NUMBER OF TRIALS The total number of six-person and twelve-person trials.
-
Jury Management Indices Report First Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201031.6% 30.0% 34.3% 31.7% 40.8 38.8 45.8 40.339.1% 40.2% 41.6% 40.3% 54.7 51.2 52.9 54.3Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
First Circuit First Circuit
0
10
20
30
40
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201031.8 31.2 36.4 30.4 82.5% 77.5% 73.0% 82.2%43.7 40.3 43.0 44.3 64.9% 64.8% 64.8% 65.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
First Circuit First CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
450
500
550
600
650
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201026.2 24.2 26.6 25.0 157 140 152 16426 9 27 3 26 7 29 0 128 112 130 132Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
First Circuit First Circuit
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
400
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.9 27.3 26.7 29.0 128 112 130 132
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 1 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
Jury Management Indices Report Escambia County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201026.6% 25.3% 26.5% 25.2% 39.4 31.7 39.7 30.638.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Escambia EscambiaState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201028.9 24.1 29.3 22.0 89.6% 88.3% 83.2% 88.0%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Escambia EscambiaState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
100
200
300
400
500Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201025.9 21.3 24.4 25.9 104 103 99 11524 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Escambia Escambia
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 1 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
Jury Management Indices Report Okaloosa County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
70
80
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201044.5% 48.8% 55.0% 51.7% 61.7 72.3 94.1 68.438.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Okaloosa OkaloosaState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10203040506070
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201056.1 63.1 85.8 54.1 34.6% 48.6% 23.3% 55.8%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
OkaloosaState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Okaloosa
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
30
40
50
60
70
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201019.4 30.6 20.0 30.2 15 14 8 1624 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Okaloosa Okaloosa
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 1 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
Jury Management Indices Report Santa Rosa County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201041.6% 34.0% 39.3% 34.7% 42.2 49.3 46.2 55.938.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Santa Rosa Santa RosaState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201035.9 42.6 38.7 42.9 100.0% 84.0% 100.0% 98.5%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Santa Rosa Santa RosaState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
406080
100120140
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201035.9 35.8 38.7 42.3 25 20 33 3024 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Santa Rosa Santa Rosa
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 1 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Walton County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201024.7% 23.2% 39.1% 24.8% 25.2 55.3 62.3 108.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Walton WaltonState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201018.8 50.3 55.3 99.3 95.5% 32.5% 28.1% 39.9%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
WaltonState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Walton
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
30
40
50
60
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201018.0 16.3 15.5 39.7 13 3 12 324 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Walton Walton
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 1 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Second Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201041.4% 43.0% 44.2% 42.7% 37.3 42.8 38.8 42.539.1% 40.2% 41.6% 40.3% 54.7 51.2 52.9 54.3Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Second Circuit Second Circuit
0
10
20
30
40
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201029.9 35.1 31.1 34.5 89.4% 76.8% 85.3% 80.5%43.7 40.3 43.0 44.3 64.9% 64.8% 64.8% 65.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Second Circuit Second CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
350
400
450
500
550
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201026.8 26.9 26.6 27.8 108 98 123 11726 9 27 3 26 7 29 0 128 112 130 132Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
First Circuit Second Circuit
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.9 27.3 26.7 29.0 128 112 130 132
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
Jury Management Indices Report Franklin County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201024.0% 0.0% 33.1% 27.3% 36.0 0.0 78.0 32.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Franklin FranklinState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10203040506070
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201036.0 0.0 58.0 27.3 58.3% 0.0% 70.7% 79.3%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
FranklinState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Franklin
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
10
20
30
40
50
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201021.0 0.0 41.0 21.7 1 0 1 324 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Franklin Franklin
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Gadsden County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201033.8% 43.3% 42.4% 37.1% 42.2 39.9 30.9 45.738.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Gadsden GadsdenState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201031.0 31.5 24.0 37.4 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Gadsden GadsdenState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
405060708090
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201031.0 31.5 24.0 37.4 12 10 16 1224 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Gadsden Gadsden
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Jefferson County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
30405060708090
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201029.8% 46.7% 32.0% 40.6% 63.0 42.0 63.0 64.338.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Jefferson JeffersonState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201059.5 35.0 56.0 57.0 11.8% 20.0% 12.5% 12.9%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
JeffersonState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Jefferson
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
102030405060
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20107.0 7.0 7.0 7.3 2 1 1 3
24 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Jefferson Jefferson
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Leon County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201042.9% 42.0% 44.2% 44.4% 37.4 44.8 39.8 41.438.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Leon LeonState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201030.2 37.3 32.1 33.2 79.8% 70.5% 81.9% 82.8%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Leon LeonState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
80
160
240
320
400
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201024.1 26.3 26.3 27.5 84 74 98 9224 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Leon Leon
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Liberty County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201035.5% 36.8% 41.5% 31.1% 19.5 34.0 0.0 64.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Liberty LibertyState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201019.5 29.8 0.0 57.5 100.0% 95.3% 0.0% 34.8%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
LibertyState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Liberty
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
10
20
30
40
50
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201019.5 28.4 0.0 20.0 2 5 0 224 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Liberty Liberty
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Wakulla County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201062.0% 62.0% 57.5% 54.4% 24.9 30.3 29.7 39.838.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Wakulla WakullaState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
60%
100%
140%
180%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201018.9 22.1 22.4 32.8 318.9% 130.5% 165.6% 87.2%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Wakulla WakullaState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
30
40
50
60
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201060.1 28.9 37.1 28.6 7 8 7 524 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Wakulla Wakulla
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 2 - 7
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Third Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201037.3% 40.3% 38.5% 31.3% 57.1 42.3 50.4 54.439.1% 40.2% 41.6% 40.3% 54.7 51.2 52.9 54.3Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Third Circuit Third Circuit
0
10
20
30
40
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201050.5 39.5 43.5 49.6 77.8% 84.8% 90.0% 63.4%43.7 40.3 43.0 44.3 64.9% 64.8% 64.8% 65.8%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Third Circuit Third CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
150
250
350
450
550
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201039.3 33.5 39.2 31.4 21 15 22 1626 9 27 3 26 7 29 0 128 112 130 132Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Third Circuit Third Circuit
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
50
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.9 27.3 26.7 29.0 128 112 130 132
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
Jury Management Indices Report Columbia County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201036.4% 47.9% 40.7% 39.2% 37.4 38.4 44.0 31.238.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Columbia ColumbiaState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201037.4 38.4 44.0 31.2 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Columbia ColumbiaState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
30
40
50
60
70
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201037.4 38.4 44.0 31.2 14 7 13 624 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Columbia Columbia
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Dixie County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201019.8% 29.3% 15.6% 27.7% 60.5 66.0 58.0 88.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Dixie DixieState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201044.5 66.0 58.0 88.0 58.4% 77.3% 60.3% 71.6%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
DixieState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Dixie
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
102030405060
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201026.0 51.0 35.0 63.0 2 1 1 124 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Dixie Dixie
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Hamilton County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
40
80
120
160
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.7% 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.0
38.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hamilton HamiltonState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
40
80
120
160
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20100.0 0.0 0.0 52.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hamilton HamiltonState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
102030405060
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20100.0 0.0 0.0 52.0 0 0 0 1
24 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hamilton Hamilton
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Lafayette County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201049.5% 33.3% 43.1% 36.7% 135.0 26.0 28.3 22.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Lafayette LafayetteState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201099.0 20.0 28.0 22.0 100.0% 100.0% 92.9% 100.0%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
LafayetteState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Lafayette
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
102030405060
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201099.0 20.0 26.0 22.0 1 1 3 124 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Lafayette Lafayette
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Madison County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
40
80
120
160
200
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201038.0% 0.0% 35.7% 38.3% 205.0 0.0 50.0 254.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Madison MadisonState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
50
100
150
200
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010205.0 0.0 50.0 230.0 2.9% 0.0% 12.0% 3.5%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Madison MadisonState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
102030405060
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20106.0 0.0 6.0 8.0 1 0 1 1
24 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Madison Madison
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Suwannee County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201046.8% 25.5% 38.2% 19.4% 71.3 56.3 85.8 44.838.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Suwannee SuwanneeState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201048.0 44.7 48.5 34.2 100.0% 100.0% 88.1% 74.9%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
SuwanneeState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Suwannee
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
30
40
50
60
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201048.0 44.7 42.8 25.6 3 3 4 524 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Suwannee Suwannee
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 7
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Taylor County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20304050607080
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20100.0% 40.8% 0.0% 43.0% 0.0 34.7 0.0 43.0
38.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Taylor TaylorState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20100.0 34.7 0.0 43.0 0.0% 27.9% 0.0% 100.0%
38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Taylor TaylorState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
102030405060
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
20100.0 9.7 0.0 43.0 0 3 0 1
24 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Taylor Taylor
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 3 - 8
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Fourth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201031.2% 33.0% 31.7% 30.3% 47.0 46.2 49.2 46.239.1% 40.2% 41.6% 40.3% 54.7 51.2 52.9 54.3
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Fourth Circuit Fourth CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
0
10
20
30
40
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201035.9 34.1 34.9 34.7 65.2% 72.6% 80.4% 83.2%43.7 40.3 43.0 44.3 64.9% 64.8% 64.8% 65.8%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Fourth Circuit Fourth Circuit
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
430
510
590
670
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201023.4 24.8 28.1 28.9 149 139 159 15826 9 27 3 26 7 29 0 128 112 130 132
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Fourth Circuit Fourth CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
350
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.9 27.3 26.7 29.0 128 112 130 132
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 4 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
Jury Management Indices Report Clay County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201045.5% 38.6% 45.7% 35.2% 60.1 93.3 79.6 135.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Clay ClayState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201052.3 79.3 63.4 122.8 34.9% 32.8% 43.6% 21.8%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
ClayState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Clay
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
30
40
50
60
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201018.3 26.0 27.6 26.8 8 7 8 424 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Clay Clay
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 4 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Duval County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201029.2% 31.7% 30.0% 29.4% 45.9 42.0 46.6 43.038.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Duval DuvalState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201034.8 30.2 32.2 31.3 68.0% 82.0% 88.0% 93.4%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Duval DuvalState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
100200300400500600
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201023.7 24.8 28.4 29.3 133 128 147 14924 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Duval Duval
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 4 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Nassau County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
20
40
60
80
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201042.7% 42.1% 40.7% 38.7% 53.0 97.3 84.3 68.838.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Nassau NassauState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201037.4 79.0 76.3 66.0 63.5% 26.6% 24.3% 30.3%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
NassauState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Nassau
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
30
40
50
60
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201023.8 21.0 18.5 20.0 8 4 424 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Nassau Nassau
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median5
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 4 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Fifth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201039.5% 39.8% 40.3% 40.8% 50.4 47.6 53.5 44.639.1% 40.2% 41.6% 40.3% 54.7 51.2 52.9 54.3
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Fifth Circuit Fifth CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
0
10
20
30
40
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201040.3 38.2 42.5 36.2 60.8% 59.1% 60.7% 63.8%43.7 40.3 43.0 44.3 64.9% 64.8% 64.8% 65.8%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Fifth Circuit Fifth Circuit
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
350
400
450
500
550
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201024.5 22.6 25.8 23.1 121 118 111 12626 9 27 3 26 7 29 0 128 112 130 132
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Fifth Circuit Fifth CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.9 27.3 26.7 29.0 128 112 130 132
Legend: Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 5 - 1
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
-
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Jury Management Indices Report Citrus County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
30
40
50
60
70
80
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201048.9% 43.8% 47.7% 44.6% 129.5 61.8 58.4 66.338.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Citrus CitrusState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010113.5 43.1 45.9 57.0 22.7% 48.2% 53.5% 38.6%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
CitrusState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Citrus
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
40
60
80
100
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201025.8 20.8 24.6 22.0 4 9 12 624 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Citrus Citrus
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 5 - 2
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Hernando County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20304050607080
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201045.9% 51.6% 52.4% 55.9% 70.8 41.2 53.3 39.538.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Hernando HernandoState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10203040506070
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201061.6 37.2 47.0 33.7 56.8% 73.7% 75.2% 83.2%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Hernando HernandoState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
30
40
50
60
70
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201035.0 27.4 35.3 28.0 8 13 9 1224 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Hernando Hernando
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 5 - 3
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Lake County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201037.5% 36.9% 38.0% 36.9% 64.7 52.2 43.8 46.638.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Lake LakeState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201051.4 39.6 33.3 36.0 57.0% 63.1% 79.4% 77.2%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
LakeState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Lake
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
30
60
90
120
150
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201029.3 25.0 26.4 27.8 28 28 36 4224 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Lake Lake
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 5 - 4
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Marion County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201036.7% 36.9% 35.7% 36.9% 39.7 47.2 56.9 43.138.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Marion MarionState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201031.1 39.0 47.7 35.8 71.2% 56.1% 48.2% 54.6%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Marion MarionState Median State Median
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
70
140
210
280
350
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201022.1 21.9 23.0 19.6 77 60 49 5824 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Marion Marion
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 5 - 5
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Sumter County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201024.8% 26.2% 25.6% 30.4% 35.3 29.0 78.0 36.438.0% 39.2% 40.7% 38.5% 48.2 49.3 53.3 51.7
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Sumter SumterState Median State Median
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
60
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201024.8 23.8 41.0 28.5 57.6% 58.9% 84.4% 61.4%38.0 39.6 45.1 42.9 59.7% 58.9% 61.3% 69.2%
SumterState Median State Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Sumter
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
20
30
40
50
60
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201014.3 14.0 34.6 17.5 4 8 5 824 1 25 0 24 8 26 5 12 9 11 12State Median State Median
Quarterly Average Panel Size
Quarterly (6 + 12 Person)
Sumter Sumter
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
24.1 25.0 24.8 26.5 12 9 11 12
Legend: County State Median Standard
State Median State Median
Quarter Ending June 30, 2010 (Data as of October 11, 2010) 5 - 6
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
-
Jury Management Indices Report Sixth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
30
40
50
60
70
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201040.8% 42.0% 46.7% 43.3% 51.1 57.2 52.4 56.739.1% 40.2% 41.6% 40.3% 54.7 51.2 52.9 54.3
Quarterly Summoning Yield
Quarterly JDPT
Sixth Circuit Sixth CircuitCircuit Median Circuit Median
0
10
20
30
40
50
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
2010Jul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun
201042.9 49.1 45.8 48.4 65.5% 58.2% 58.6% 61.5%43.7 40.3 43.0 44.3 64.9% 64.8% 64.8% 65.8%Circuit Median Circuit Median
Quarterly PBI Quarterly Percent to Voir Dire
Sixth Circuit Sixth Circuit
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
10
20
30
40
50
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend
480
560
640
720
800
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataJul-Sep
2009Oct-Dec
2009Jan-Mar
2010Apr-Jun