(jw;~tul · oshima chun fong & chung represents oahu sugar company, ltd. in this matter. the...

148
· RNJAMIN J. CAYETANO 00II8IN0II M HAW'" STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P. O. BOX 821 HONOLULU. HAWAII 98a09 FEB 24 1998 Mr. Austin Smith Waiahole Irrigation Company, Ltd. 95-295 Lonom.ea Street Mililani, HI 96789 Dear Mr. Smith: Notice of Action REVOCATION OF WATER USE PERMITS WP 2A, 2B, Well Nos. 2301-21 to 26 for 5.594 mgd (WUP No. 130) WP 2C, 2D, Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32 for 1.862 mgd (WOP No. 131) WP 4A, 4B, Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20 for 3.305 mgd (WUP No. 129) WaiPahu-Waiawa Ground Water Management Area· Oahu. TMK 9-4-2:8 This letter serves as your official notice of the action by the Commission on Water Resource Management (Commission) at their meeting on February 18, 1998, to revoke the subject water use permits, pursuant to §174C-58(4) Hawaii Revised Statutes. MICHAEL D. WILSON ROBERT G. GlR,t.LD DAVID A. NOBRIGA LAWRENCE H. MilKE RlCHARO H. COX HERBERT M. RICHARDS. JR. EDWIN T. $AXODA ,t.(;TJNG DEPUTY OIAECTOfl The Commission is also requiring the owner of Well Nos. 2301-11 to 32 to work with the Commission staff and provide evidence within sixty (60) days showing that the following conditions for abandonment are not applicable to the subject wells: LN:ss a. Their purpose has been served, or b. Their use bas been permanently discontinued, and c. Their physical condition is causing or threatening CODtammatiOn, deterioration in quality, or waste of ground-water resources, or d. Their state of disrepair makes their continued use impractical or creates a hazard to public health or safety. Please contact Glenn Bauer at 587-0263 regarding the abandonment action. Sincerely, EDWIN T. Acting Deputy Director c: Gary Grottke, Northbrook Corporation Yvonne 1m, Oshima Chun Fong " Chung

Upload: others

Post on 18-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

· RNJAMIN J. CAYETANO 00II8IN0II M HAW'"

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P. O. BOX 821

HONOLULU. HAWAII 98a09

FEB 24 1998

Mr. Austin Smith Waiahole Irrigation Company, Ltd. 95-295 Lonom.ea Street Mililani, HI 96789

Dear Mr. Smith:

Notice of Action REVOCATION OF WATER USE PERMITS

WP 2A, 2B, Well Nos. 2301-21 to 26 for 5.594 mgd (WUP No. 130) WP 2C, 2D, Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32 for 1.862 mgd (WOP No. 131) WP 4A, 4B, Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20 for 3.305 mgd (WUP No. 129)

WaiPahu-Waiawa Ground Water Management Area· Oahu. TMK 9-4-2:8

This letter serves as your official notice of the action by the Commission on Water Resource Management (Commission) at their meeting on February 18, 1998, to revoke the subject water use permits, pursuant to §174C-58(4) Hawaii Revised Statutes.

MICHAEL D. WILSON

ROBERT G. GlR,t.LD DAVID A. NOBRIGA LAWRENCE H. MilKE

RlCHARO H. COX HERBERT M. RICHARDS. JR.

EDWIN T. $AXODA ,t.(;TJNG DEPUTY OIAECTOfl

The Commission is also requiring the owner of Well Nos. 2301-11 to 32 to work with the Commission staff and provide evidence within sixty (60) days showing that the following conditions for abandonment are not applicable to the subject wells:

LN:ss

a. Their purpose has been served, or

b. Their use bas been permanently discontinued, and

c. Their physical condition is causing or threatening CODtammatiOn, deterioration in quality, or waste of ground-water resources, or

d. Their state of disrepair makes their continued use impractical or creates a hazard to public health or safety.

Please contact Glenn Bauer at 587-0263 regarding the abandonment action.

Sincerely,

(jw;~TUlw EDWIN T. ~Ax.ODA Acting Deputy Director

c: Gary Grottke, Northbrook Corporation Yvonne 1m, Oshima Chun Fong " Chung

Page 2: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

February 18, 1998

Michael Wilson, Chairman, and Members of the Commission on Water Resource Management

1151 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Re: Revocation of Oahu Sugar Compan~' s Water Use Permits i

Dear Mr. Wilson:

o V..J~~t1~

~c.-VC ~ 'f. l"2-"'-

e, 'l-{ ttl (1. ~ w~ MJA--b~

Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter.

The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131) be revoked pursuant to HRS §174C-5&(4) due to four continuous years of non-use. The staff further recommends that the battery of~ells which constitute WP2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, WP4A and 4B be required to be backfilled and sealed within two years.

!

i

Oahu Sugar does not oppose the revpcation of the water use permits. Since sugar cultivation ceased in 1993, the water allocat~ons have not been used. Also, there is no imminent future need for these allocations. !

Oahu Sugar, however, strongly oppqses the staff recommendation that the wells be deemed abandoned and required to be backfllled and sealed. Oahu Sugar has been exploring, and continues to explore, alternative uses for its wells. It is premature at this time to make a determination that these wells will not have a future use. We ask the Commission recognize the state of transition that this entire area is currently in and allow more time before ordering that the wells be sealed.

WP2 and WP4 are being considered as backup to WPI, which is the source of non potable water for the Waikele Golf Course and for the Mill Site. They could also serve as backup to WP7, which, although not currently in use, is being seriously considered for use by the Navy on the Waipio Peninsula. WP 1 and WP7 are ol<l wells, and if and when maintenance requires that they be shut down, WP2 and WP4 could provide backup sources of water.

The Honolulu Board of Water Supply has also explored the possibility of utilizing the infrastructure that is in place in developing additional potable water supplies for the area.

400 Davies Pacific Center· 841 Bishop Street· Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 • Telephone (808)528-4200 • Facsimile (808) 531-8466

Page 3: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

! - o o Additionally, the Commission is aware that its Waiahole Ditch decision is currently being

appealed. If the supreme court were to significantly decrease the amount of water that flows through the Ditch to irrigate leeward lands, WP2 and WP4 could possibly be called upon to supplement Ditch flows as they had done during Oahu Sugar's history.

Granted, Oahu Sugar's plea to hold off on the decision on sealing the wells is premised on many "ifs" and "coulds". Oahu Sugar, along with State and City governments, other landowners and other interested parties have been grappling over the past few years with this major transition from sugar plantations, which had existed for a century. As this Commission is well aware, we are still in this period of transition. There are many moving parts to consider in making decisions about the future of this area and they are not confined to one region of the island. It is often not easy to reach finality on issues. Thus, all we are asking is, in light of the circumstances, that Oahu Sugar be given a little more time before having to determine whether or not there will be future uses for these wells.

Backfilling and sealing the wells will be expensive and permanent. Given the state of transition and uncertainty that we are in, it is premature to decide that WP2 and WP4 should be permanently put out of commission.

Oahu Sugar is cognizant of concerns when a well is not actively in use. Measures have been taken to mitigate these potential problems. For safety purposes and to guard against contamination, the well and pump station sites are accessible only through locked gates. The buildings are fully secured with tamper-prooflocks and a security guard makes daily rounds of these areas.

Neither WP2 nor WP4 is in such a state of disrepair as to render either impractical for use. Nor do either of them create any hazard to public health or safety.

Based on the above, Oahu Sugar respectfully requests that the Commission not accept the staff recommendation that WP2 and WP4 be backfilled and sealed. However, Oahu Sugar does not object to the revocation of Water Use P.ermit Nos. 129, 130 and 13l.

Thank you for this opportunity to address the Commission on this matter.

Very truly yours,

vonne lzu Attorney for Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd.

cc: Gary Grottke

Page 4: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

8EN; ... MIN. : .. vET ... NO GOV!""" :~ -AWAII

o o

STATE OF HAWAII OEPARTMENT OF LANO AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ".O.IOX'21

HONOlUlU. HAWAII 9tIOt

ST AFF SUBMITTAL

for the meeting of the COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

February 18, 1998 'onolulu, Oahu

~ Sugar Co., Ud. REVOCATIO~ OF WATER USE PERMITS

WP 2A, 2B, Well Nos. 23Q.1-21 to 26 for 5.594 mgd (wup No. 130) WP 2C, 2D, Well Nos. 23d1-27 to 32 for 1.862 mgd (WUp No. 131) WP 4A, 4B, Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20 for 3.305 mgd (WUp .No. 129)

Wajpahu-Waiawa Ground Wfter Mangement Area. Oahu. TMK 9-4-2:8

LOCATION MAP: See Exhibit 1

BACKGROUND:

MICHAE~ O. W1LSo:"

ROBERT G. GiPA..: O ... VID .... NOB"·:o,o. ~wRE"'CE H. ~ C!

IIIC ..... IID H. ::. HERBERT M. RIC ...... ~:S. JR.

On April 11, 1980, the Board of Land and Natural Resources approved the certification of Oahu Sugar Company, ~. 's (OSCO) existing uses and quantities of withdrawal for the subject wells. The water was used for sugarcane agriculture.

OSCo's certified withdrawals were adjus~ on May 17, 1989, January 16, 1992, and December 6, 1995 in response to revised sustainable' yield estimates and abc reduction in OSCO's irrigau:d acreage.

In the summer of 1993, OSCO announced the closure of its sugarcane operations.

ANAL YSIS/ISSUES:

These wells have not been used for over four (4) years; the last report of water use was for December, 1993 (Exhibits 1 to 3). Partial or total nonuse of the water allowed by the permit for a period of four continuous years or more constitutes a ground for revocation of the permit, pursuant to §174C-58(4) Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS).

In a letter dated February 2, 1998, the Commission notified OSCO of these proposed revocations.

This submittal fulfills the hearing requirePtent under § 174C-58 HRS for revocation of a water use permit. I

Iten 3

Page 5: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o Staff Submittal February 18, 1998

Due to the loss in return irrigation recharge resulting from the cessation of OSCO's irrigation practices in the Pearl Harbor area, the Commission staff is in the procesS of reviewing sustainable yields with a view towards optimizing withdrawals from the affected aquifers. This would include the backfilling or sealing of existing wells that have been drilled too deep so that total aquifer pumpage may be maximized. (New wen constructions are subject to the Hawaii Wen Construction and Pump Installation Standards, January 1997 (HWCPIS), which requires initial design and pump testing at a depth below seaf level not exceeding one-fourth of the theoretical thickness (41 times head) of the basal aquifer.)

The subject wells are very deep and very old. HWCPIS states:

• AU wells tmd test borings tIS defined in these StondIJrds nuat be properly abandoned and pe171lll1lDltly sealed to prot«l the ground-wtlUr resolUCes ~ the State of Hawoii from contamilultion tmd waste and to protect public heIlJth tmd sofely. whenever:

1. 1heir purpose 1uls been served, or

2. 1heir use has been permanently disconrinued, and

3. 1heir physical condition is causing or threatening contamination. deterioration in quality, or waste of ground-water resources, or

4. 1heir state of disrepair makes their continued use impractical or creates a hazard to pubUc health or safety.·

The Commission staff recommends that the Commission require the owner to abandon and seal the wens within two (2) years, unless the owner can provide evidence, within sixty (60) days, showing that none of the above conditions for abandonment have been met.

RECOMMENDATION:

~~ Staff recommends that the Commission: ~'\Y\ ~

1. Revoke WUP Nos. 129, no, and 131. y:tj'~">/ ~

2. t.~- r.

Require the owner of Well Nos.( 11 to 32 to~andon and seal the wens, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 13-168, Water Use, Wells, and Stream Diversion Works, Hawaii Administrative Rules, within two (2) years, unless the owne~rovide1 evidence within sixty (60) days showing that the following conditions are not applicable to the subject wells:

a. Their purpose has been served, or

b. Their use has been permanently discontinued, and

2

Page 6: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

Staff Submittal

o o February 18, 1998

c. Their physical condition is causing or threatening contamination, deterioration in quality, or waste of ground-water resources, or

d. Their state of disrepair makes their continued use impractical or creates a hazard to public health or safety.·

!>, lw,tA: ~~~ ~ ~Jo~\ v<tCo~v-J~~ ~ bD klA~ Respectfully submitted, .. -) U-,\~'~~ ~~.

Exhibit(s): 1 (Location Map)

~;J\.Tj~~ EDWIN T. SAKODA Acting Deputy Director

2 (Graph of Monthly Pumpage for Well Nos. 2301-21 to 26) 3 (Graph of Monthly Pumpage for Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32) 4 (Graph of Month-'!y Pumpage for Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20)

I

3

W~ c.l..c)~\iYL.-.

Page 7: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

.. -

00 ,-I! ,)(17

.. ---

----

, .\

' .. \ ~ .-..

I":';~" , .'

1'/"/ '\ ' ·V .~ -. ~

_#~ _.- ... ..,.

.... -.t. J -., ... -

'" \ ,Y :\

,

.... ,.,........ -...;. ... _­... --

~l

__ e. t

, .... \ .-, .... r

- .. ...,. \

,~."-'''';

,...' .. '.-.. ../ , • . , ,tf

\ -

'", /~ \ ". ./ . .." '. ---

"

~,

\

Page 8: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

12

Monthly Pumpage WP2A,28 (Well Nos. 2301-21 to 26)

, I __ 11 ___ _ ,t. _ _ II

I~ I ,_ •

'/ "~I I : ~ • "

I II. I .~ 1 1',1 • '"

I ,'.' • '.t

I

" , ' . ' . ' I 1. ~ ~ ~I~ _

~II- - , II' _._ .1 _ _

, ' " • I

" , , , ,

, -r -0,_ 1 -

o 14,:

o

i • , ' , ' , ' , ' " " ,

, j -

I

• , "

" " " "

". ". .tL .. ",' It I I .... II '" . "

" " \

------~ ----[ ,~ :' " "

__ 'L " ~,------_ .. -' ':, " " r - '1'-, ' " . ",'. , ' ' ,. .,' ~ , ,0" "'" " I" ' '" , , ' " " I t 1'1

- - ~ £ -o

, " ~

or, .JOt

" "n

" ", ,

" " I ' \ I ~ I !

,\I' ~ " :/ I II, \ : I I :"'~! ~. \ " ,. \

monthly pumpage 12-MAV - .noc.ted amount

o

0

gll"miirm"ll~lf'lllllllll

Page 9: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

10

-'"0 6 CJ)

,..." E ->< Q) :r: CJ) CQ - 0.

o::::J E - ~

--I 0. 4

CA),

2

o

, , \ ,I" ", " ~ , '"I

J '." ' " , \

, ,. ,

" _11' _

, ,

I ~I ,

I I ,~ , "

r - -

it' - '/. I ,

Monthly Pumpage WP2C.2D (Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32)

, , ., ,

I I',' ,\ :

- t

'I

'I '.

, " " ,

, I ' I ' \ ' \ " ' :: : " '

, " II, I

I't I

II. I

I','

, ,

,

, I I

" " " '" " I '.'

- - - oJ i - - ~I'~ -.' ~ ,I •• It f,' t ,tI I I

• Itt t ." . ~. , ' j' , '

,I I \ •• , ,

',' '" , ,

" :: .. ----~ ~ --, \' \ : ~ r " " ,.. 'f" 11 I I'" I I

" • I , I

'\ h,

"

It • I I I ", I I I I It:

II I " I I" I I I 1'1, • ... 1'1 II ", I I ,'I

.. __ ._.

. . • I "I "I II, _______ _

- "If" -II~

"I, II" IIII II"

Il't

'I" , ~, , \, , \, - - ;"-1 i

" I I

\ I ,I It I , ,

r"irnTT'li~"'ITI""Wi,"", .... "m",m"jgTl'mlm"""liIml ia""",'rrll ~l1fTiI w~~~rt" nrwtr

monthly pumpage 12-MAV - .aocated amount

o

o

Page 10: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

..." >< :::c -::c ---I +=-

-"0 0)

E -CI) 0) co Q.

E 6.

12

10

8

6 -

4

2

o

.. , - - - .. , - -I' " ,I' ,', I" _ I ,,/ ,

"" ~, ,\ " , "", , , ",\ , 1/ 1/' \ , 1/ II' \ , ,'L ... ,~ . I'. • tI, .', ,II, .\ Itll'l

" UI. II ..

11'1

'" . " I. _' .. ,_

I '" ' .. " "

" • - - ... -\

Monthly Pumpage WP4A,4B (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20)

monthly pumpage

, " ,"

- ,. I

" " "

I "

': :: :., .. 1

" , " ,

12-MAV

----------- ..

I

----~---------/, I

" " " " " 't ' I, " ,,, I I • I ~ II I. ' I ,II, _

• t" '. .11"1

-.---~~.-~~---~~~ t' I .. t " I'. I , , , I' ,

- IIIocated amount

\

o

o

'~'lIlnnarrmn~~111I11111I

Page 11: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

IINJAMIN J. CAYETANO OOVEN«IfIOFHAWM

Mr. Austin Smith

o o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND ANO NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P. O.IOX 121

HONOLULU. HAWAII HIOS

FEB ~2 1998

Waiahole Irrigation Company. Ltd. 95-295 Lonomea Street MiliJaDi. m 96789

Dear Mr. Smith:

Revocation of Wamr Use Permits WUP No. 130 (wp 2A.2B. Well Nos. 2301-21 to 26) WUP No. 131 (wp 2C,2D, Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32) WUP No. 129 (wp 4A.4B. Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20)

Waipahu-Waiawa Ground Water Mana&ement ~, Oahu

MICHAEL O. WlLS()tj

ROBERT G. (l1l1AU) DAVID A. NOBRIGA LAWRENCE H. "'I <E

RICHARD H. COX HERBERT M. RlCHAAOS. JR.

EDWIN T. SAKOOA ACTING DEPUTY DIMCtOII

This is to notify you that the Commission on Water Resource Management (Commission) will consider revocation of the subject water use permits due to four (4) continuous years of nonuse. pursuant to §174C-58 Hawaii Revised Statutes. Our records show that the sources were last pumped in December. 1993 (see attached graphs).

The staff is planning to submit this, recommendation to the Commission at their regular meeting on February 18. 1998. We will ~ you a copy of the staff submittal when that document is finalized, about six (6) days prior to the meeting date.

If you have any questions. please QOIltact Lenore Nakama at 587-0218.

LN:ss Attachments

Sincerely,

(luJ;;l TJL~ vi,", EDWIN T. SAKODA Acting Deputy Director

c: Gary Grottke, Northbrook Corporation Yvonne lzu, Oshima, ,Chun, Fong & Chung

Post-it~ Fax Note 7671

Page 12: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

12

10 ----_._- - - -- - -

0 8

I __ . ___ ..i, _ ____ + ____ /'

" \

", " , \ ..... I",,' \ ,,' " "C 'I'" \ , \ , " en ' ", I

, " E

, II' \ ' , ,

" I, 11 11, , I'

" - I, (I) 11 11, I

" 6 j~ - u·..I4 ----~--~--en 1'1 Mill co , a. ,', I I',

" E d 111'1

" " II

, Co

1111

"11 1111 I , '" \

4 '---1-1,----,

-1-, ~ I I "

, " "

,

" " I\~ '" '" '"

0 '" 2

'\ -- - - '1- - - - J t- - - _.

~ ,

r , I I I

0

Monthly Pumpage WP4A,4B (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20)

I " I~ -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - .

" "

" " "

" "I ,', ._I .... '~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

III, "

',', "

I, ; " I II "

~ J I ,I r I

I,I "

: I I " 'I

,~------~-------------~~t

, , , , , , ,

" "

"

" ,

" " " II

, , , , , ,

, -------~-------------

" \ " 'I " 'I , , I I I I " /, " I I I " I I ,1,\ " '," / I ,"1/\

- - - - - ~ - - - -I ..,.' +- - .l.. -1- - - f-! .lI ""1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .

1\ I I" I I ,'_ 1

II , I ' , , I , I , , ,

date (latest data 12197)

monthly pumpage -- 12-MAV allocated amount

Page 13: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

12

10

0 8

-"0 0)

E ....... 8, 6 ttl a. E ::J a.

4

o 2

o

Monthly Pumpage WP2A,2B (Well Nos. 2301-21 to 26)

, " - - - - ~~- ,- - - - ~ - - - -

I ~ J I I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ - - - - -- - - - - - - -

, " " " ,

: \ " \ _ .J,.. I '\ I I rI, --1

,", I, II, ~ I I I I

,':' :: I II; II: II II I

~I' II,I':\J ' I ,'- TI JI ~ ~ ,,' II I I

I I,' , , I' 11 1

~ [ It ,

I,', • I,',

'II, , , , , 1 ..J I- -

" " " " " " \

" I 'I I I

I 'I I,,' I "1 I I 1,/

- ,. l,j I I If

'" '" , , , ,

" , , , I

- - _. I I +-, t -

" " " "

I," II'

I,' I" I '/ ' I ~ I

", i ' ", " ,'/ ' ", " \', I I" I I

- 1 . ..1,- _ ..J _,II I I " I IT - -1- I

,,: /' I It" /' 11 ~ , I ,

, " --I"-t---,--1-

,. "

, " ,

" ---rl-

, J _. _

" " )'

" , , , ' , ' I I " ,- 1- - fI - - -I I " I I "

"

\ :' " "

" " " " :1 , ':\

~ - - - - - - - - - ., L - - - - - - - ~ - r - ~II- - -~ I I I, I

" _ ...iI, __ _

tl/l

", , , ,

" I II, " " II ,11 '1 I /I ,'I"

,II '/ , II I I

I I II

: I I ':: I - - 1 J. - - - - - - -l -'- T -,

I , ,I

,T ., ~I I

I' I

monthly pumpage ~- 12-MAV - allocated amount

,~rrrrrTTl~~n IIHI n

Page 14: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

o

\

10

8

=s 6

~ -Q) 0) co a. c-5. 4

2

o

Monthly Pumpage WP2C,2D (Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32)

, ' " \ , " , , I' ' "

I II,' ,I, \

, ' " I ,\ "

I \ ::

I I " Jd I I "t ',Ii

.1 !...,'IJ1 n I \ It T _Il...l_ I ' '" - r -' -

J I ,', I I

_'-1_1- - _~~ - - ",t I,' I I II rifT - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I " I I II I ,I

r - -

'­,

1- _. _

, 'I' \ I I f \ ~ I

II I ~ f ,,/\ \ II'

'" 'II

'II 'II

" /,1' 1

" ,II I " III

I" II' I I I I' I

I . L I ~ , III I TIl- _It

Itl III

, " "

- -'- -'- -I ------

'" '" I\j , H

" , ,

"

"

" _", I 'II, I

" , , , I ~ ---J- -- -r .-.1 +----------r--

I - - - -, -, III

T- I I I I I I

- - -' ;.1 ~ _ '_ -~ t- L - -1- -4 - - "1 -

\1'1 I: t

I" 'II

, , , , , , , ,

" " I I

" It /- - - - -' ~ -I " , "

"

" " "

" , ':" It

" " I, " " " " " I I "

"

" - I ~ -, " " " " ,

, ,

, , , , , , ,,, 1111 ~ ,

I ___ --,

- - - - - 1 \ /'

" " . It I' 1\/' , ' ,

'" , '\ ", I,

date (latest data 12197)

monthly pumpage -- 12-MAV - allocated amount

T~If11TTm

Page 15: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

OCT 09 '97 15:38 TO-5870219 FROH- CFC

Ms. Lenore Nakama Commission on Water Resource Managemen 1151 Punchbowl Street Room 227 Honolulu. m 96813

RE:

Dear Lenore:

ermits

T-448 P.02/02 F-275

o

October 9. 1997

In response to your question to me. onununication regarding Oahu Sugar Company's wells and water usc pcnnits should be addre sed to:

Austin Smith Waiahole Irrigation Company. Limi 95-295 Lonomea Street Mililani, m 96789.

Copies should be sent to:

Gary Grottke Executive Vice President Northbrook Corporation 900 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, n.., 60611-1581

and also to Alan Oshima or me.

Please feel free to call me if you hav: any further questions.

Very truly yours,

400 Davies PacifiC Canter • 841 Bishap Street • HOIlOI • Hawaii 96813 • Telephone (80B)528-4200 • Facsimile (808) 531-8466

Page 16: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

- OCT 09 '97 15:38 TO-5870219 c

OSBlMACHUN FONG & CHUNG AlTORNEYS AT LAW

FROH OCFC T-448 P.01/02 F-275

TRANSMITIAL MEMORANDUM VIA FACSIMILE

THRi lfit$$.4tJE I6IN1ENDEII t»II..V FOR 1HIi us£ QP THE l. DR ENIITY ro WIICH"" IS AIJDIIU$EII. ANP .... V CDNTIUN ~lION THAT,. ~ Aillllfl¥N7JAL ANP _ IIIftW DlsctOSURE UNDER Al'I'UcAaE tAw. IF 1M READER OF THIS IlUU(I£ 1$ NOT DIE IIfI'fNDEIi MtJII'IENT. 011 7HI! OVg OR AGENr RESI'ONUII.E FM IJRNEIIIIIIB 1HI1111ft$AtfE J1) THE wnNDEII MCII'ffNT. YOU ARE IItREIIV NO"RFIEII JHAT DlUSllNA 1JOJI4 DISJJfIIItITI(J OR CIJIIYING 0II1H1$ COIIIIIIINH:AmNJ IS 8TIfIC'Il. V I'ROHIIITID. IF yuu 1fAvt!,,~ ."". fION IN atI'WI't. I'UACE N07IFV W ~7HV .v 7W~ AND RElVRN THE allQMlAL IIHSAtW J1) US AT tIlE A'OVE DDIlR$ VIA TH£ U.S. I'OSTAL sDlVlCE. 'THANK YOU.

DATE: October 9. 1997

TO: Ms. Lenore Nakama

FAX NO: 587-0219 TEL NO: 587"()215

FROM: Yvonno Y. Izu 'n,LII.Q

FAX NO: (808) 531-8466 TEL NO: (80a) 528-4200

TIME: g," 1. T f"" .

TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 2

TRANSMITTING FROM: Toshiba TF851

CASE NAME: Amfac - AgWater CASE NUMBER: 618 - 002

DOCUMENT(S) SENT: 1. Letter Lenore Nakama from Yvonne lzu dated

REMARKS:

f:\d~"'tlnt\8mo\fax\cwrm.doo

Octobe 9. 1997 re Oahu Sugar Wells and Water Permits

400Pavica Pleifi!: CcnlOr' 841 Bilhop Stnct. SlIite 400- ulu. Hawaii 96813. TolaphOllC {BOll) nB-4200. Facaitnilc (108) $31-'466

Page 17: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO GOII£RNOR OF HAWAII

Mr. Bert L. Hatton Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd.

Q o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P. O. BOX 621

HONOLUlU, HAWAII 96809

JUN 1 2 1996

700 Bishop Street, 21st Floor Honolulu, HI 96813

Dear Mr. Hatton:

Notice of Action Water Use Pennit for Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20

Waipahu-Waiawa Ground Water Management Area. Oahu

MICHAEL. D. WILSON ctWRPERI90N

ROBERT G. GlRAlD DAVID A. NOBRIGA

LAWRENCE H. MIlKE RICHARD H. COX

HERBERT M. RICHARDS, JR.

RAE M. LOUI, P.E. DEPUTY

This letter serves as your officiall\otice of the action by the Commission on Water Resource Management (Commission) on pecember 6, 1995 to revoke 0.695 mgd for the water use pennit for WP 4A, 4B (Well Nf. .. 2301-11 to 20) due to four (4) years of continuous non-use. The Commission's 'on also provides for an extension of the 1995 deadline for review and adjustment of th allocation for the well to December 1996.

LN:ss

i

If you have any questions, please contact Lenore Nakama at 587-0218.

Sincerely,

RAE M. LOUI Deputy Director

Page 18: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o MINUTES

FOR TIlE MEETING OF THE COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

DATE: TIME: PLACE:

December 6, 1995 19:30 am . Interisland Terminal Conference Center 7th Floor Honolulu International Airport

Chairperson Michael Wilson called the m eting of the Commission on Water Resource Management to order at 10:10 a.m.

The following were in attendance:

OTHERS:

Mr. Kalani Haia Mr. Peter Aiello Mr. Tom Nance Mr. Hide Takahashi Mr. Howard Hamamoto· Mr. Ronald Sakamoto Mr. Edsel Yamada

MEMBERS: Mr. Michael Wilson Mr. Richard Cox Dr. Lawrence Miike Mr. Robert Girald Mr. David Nobriga Mr. Herbert Richards, Jr.

COUNSEL:

Ms. Rae Loui Mr. Edwin Sakoda Mr. Roy Hardy Ms. Lyann Mizuno Mr. David Higa Mr. Charley Ice Ms. Janis Uwaine

Mr. William Tam

Mr. Tim Steinberger Mr. David Bills Mr. Randy Ouye Ms. Rosemary Liu Mr. Chester Lao Ms. Carolyn Hayashi Ms. Karen Piltz

Ms. Jan Sullivan Ms. Elizabeth Martin Mr. Alan Suwa Mr. Mark Morita Mr. Barty Usagawa Ms. Lola Mench Mr. Al Chee

All written testimonies submitted at the meeting are filed in the Commission office and are available for review by interested parties. The items were not taken in the order posted on the agenda.

AGENDA 1 Item 1

------'--------------------_.,'-

Page 19: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

ITEM 1.

ITEM 2.

ITEM 3.

o o MINUfES OF 1HE OCTOBER 18,1995 AND OCTOBER 20,1995 MEETINGS.

Minutes of October 18, 1995:

Amendment:

Commissioner Cox requested to have Mr. Pat Liu corrected to Ms. Pat Liu.

MOTION: (COX/GIRAID)

To approve the minutes as amended.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.

Minutes of the October 20, 1995 meeting:

MOTION: (GIRAID/RICHARDS)

To approve the minutes.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.

OLD BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS

None.

Schuler Homes, Jnc. Aj>plication for a Stream. Channel Alteration Permit Construction of Drainage Outlet Structure: Puali Stream.. Pub; Kauai CfMK 3-3-03:33)

PRESENTATION OF SUBMrITAL: Mr. David Higa.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommended that the Commission approve the construction of a drainage outlet structure on Puali Stream, Puhi, Kauai for a period of two years from the date of approval, subject to the conditions listed in the staff ~bmittal ..

TESIlMONY BY APPUCANT:

Mr. David Bills of Schuler Homes, Inc. stated that they have conformed with all requirements thus far and will continue doing so.

2

Page 20: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

ITEM 4.

ITEM 5.

o o

MOllON: (COXIRICHARDS)

To approve staff's recommendation.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.

Mr. Charley Ice

SfAFF RECOMMENDAll

Staff recommended that e Commission approve the issuance of a well construction pennit for H kukano Well, subject to the standard well construction pennit condi ·ons in Attachment C, as well as the following special condition:

1. The grouted annulus of the well shall be to a depth of at least 500 feet. TlPe grouted annular space shall be at least three inches all a{ound the casing.

!

MOTION: (COX/RI~S)

PRESENTATION OF SUBMl1TAL: Mr. Charley Ice

SfAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommended the following:

A. That the Commission approve the issuance of a well construction permit for Wahiawa n Well Addition, subject to the standard well construction permit conditions in Attachment C of the staff submittal.

3

-------'------------_________ . f_

Page 21: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

ITEM 6.

o o B. The Commission authorize the Chairperson to approve and

issue a pump installation pennit for a 2,100 gpm, or less, pump, upon acceptance of adequate aquifer pump test results required in Condition 6(e), subject to the standard pump installation pennits conditions in Attachment E.

MOTION: (GlRAID/NOBRIGA)

To approve staffs recommendation.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED.

MODIFICATION OF A WATER USE PERMIT. CAS11.E & COOKE. INC .. OOLE CANNERY WElLS (WELL NOS.19S2-11.13.20.21l. KALIm GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT AREA. OAHU

PRESENTATION OF SUBMfITAL: Mr. Roy Hardy

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommended that the Commission modify Castle & Cooke, Inco's permitted use for Well Nos. 1952-11, 13, 20, 21 to specify an allocation for reasonable and beneficial use of 0.175 mgd for industrial, domestic, and agricultural uses at the Dole Cannery site, subject to the standard water use permit conditions listed in Attachment A.

Amendment:

Staff requested to amend number 18 of Attachment A, Standard Water Use Permit Conditions, as follows:

18. The water use permit shall be subject to the Commission's establishment of instream standards and policies to the·Stream Protection and Management (SPAM) plan, as well as legislative mandates to protect stream resources.

MOTION: (COXINOBRIGA).

To approve staffs recommendation as amended. - .

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED.

4

Page 22: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

ITEM 7.

o HEARING FOR REVOCATION OF WATER USE PERMITS. OAHU SUGAR COMPANY (WELL NOS. 2301-11 TO 20 & 2301-27 TO 32). nm ESfATE OF JAMES CAMPBElJ.. (WELL NOS. 2202-03 TO 141. WAJPAHU-WAIAWA GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT AREA. OAHU

PRESENfATION OF SUBMITTAL: Mr. Roy Hardy

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Amendment:

Staff requested to amend the staff recommendation as follows:

Staff recommends 1t the Commission:

TESTIMONY:

1. Revok~ the amounts of water not in use for the last four continfous years shown in Exlubit 3 under "4-YR NON­USE".,

2. Extend the 1995 deadline for review and adjustment of the anocations for the wells shown in Exhibit 2 to December 1996 to provide additional time for the staff to complete a comprehensive review of current and projected needs in the PHGWMA.

Mr. Kalani Haia of the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council gave oral and written testimony in support of staffs recommendation to revoke the amount of water which has not been in use for the last four year period. He urged the Commission to revoke r,e 6.469 mgd for non-use and asked that the Commission wait until the aiahole Combined Contested Case Hearing is completed to re-allocate th water.

MOTION: (COXIRICHARDS)

To approve stafl's recommendation as amended.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED.

ITEM 8(a) ROYAL OAHU RESORT. INC/OAHU SUGAR CO, LTD, APPUCATION FOR A WATER USE PERMIT. WP 2 (WELL NOS. 2301-21 TO 321. 1'MK 9+2:8. MODIFICATION OF WATER USE PERMIT FOR FtITURE IRRIGATION USE FOR 0.750 MGD

5

--~------------------------------------------~I-

Page 23: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o ill Ewa Plain Water Development Corporation/The Estate of James Campbell

Application for a Well ConstructionlPump Installation Permit, Honouliuli Well 7 (Well No. 2302-Q71. TMK 9-2-1:01. Construction of a IS-inch Diameter. 565-foot Deep Well and Installation of a 2050 &pm Pump for Future Municipal Uses. Applications for Water Use Permits. Honouliuli WeDs 7.8.9 (Well Nos. 2302-Q7 to 09). TMK 9-2-1:01. Future Municipal Use for Total 3.360 mgd. Waipahu-Waiawa Groundwater Management Area. Oahu

PRESENTATION OF SUBMfITAL: Mr. Roy Hardy

SfAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Amendment:

Staff requested to amend the staff submittal so that any reference to Puu Makakilo is deleted and corresponding updates to allocation figures in Table 1 is made accordingly.

Further, staff requested to amend the staff recommendation as follows:

Staff recommends that the Commission:

1. Deny the standing of the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council to file objections to the application by Royal Oahu Resort, Inc./Oahu Sugar Co. Ltd.

2. Find that the objection made by the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council, on behalf of the Office of Hawaii Affairs, is untimely.

3. Find that a public hearing is not required based on the grounds of the objections by the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council, on behalf of Mr. Charles Herring.

4. Approve the issuance of an interim water use permit to Royal Oahu Resort, Inc./Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd. for the reasonable and beneficial use of 0.750 mgd. of nonpotable groundwater from the Waiapahu-Waiawa Aquifer System for golf course irrigation use at the Royal Oahu Resort Golf Club and 4.844 mgd for agriculture use for WP2 for agricultural use, subject to the standard water use permit conditions in Attachment B and the following special conditions:

a. Should an alternate permanent source of water supply be found for this use, then

6

..

Page 24: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

-- o o the Commission reserves the right to revoke this pennit, after a hearing.

b. The applicant shall notify the Commission, within thirty (30) days from the date of this submittal, which of the WP 2 batteries should be specified on the water use permit.

5. Appro e the issuance of an interim water use permit to Ewa Pain Water Development Corp./The Estate of James Campbell for the reasonable and beneficial use of 1.120 mgd of fresh groundwater from the Waipahu­Waia a Aquifer System for Honouliuli Well 7 (Well Nos. 2302- 7 to 09) for municipal use, subject to the stand d water use permit conditions in Attachment B.

6. Deny ·thout prejudice the water use applications by Ewa lain Water Development Corp./The Estate of Jame Campbell for Honouliuli Wells 8 & 9 (Well Nos. 2302-08 & 09).

7. Approve the issuance of a well construction permit for Honoliliuli Well 7 (Well No. 2302-07) subject to the standard well construction conditions in Attachment C.

8. Authorize the Chairperson to approve and issue a pump installation permit upon acceptance of adequate aquifer pump test results, required under Condition 6.e. of the well construction permit, subject to the standard pump installation permit conditions in Attachment D.

TESTIMONY BY APPUCANT:

Mr. Randy Ouye, of Ewa Plains Gentty Homes Ltd. testified that they are running out of water. He requested that the word "interim" from staff recommendation #5 be deleted and wanted staff recommendation #6 to be deferred, rather than "deny without prejudice".

Ms. Jan Sullivan of Halekua Development testified in support of Royal Hawaiian Resort.

7

~----------------------------------------------_,'-

Page 25: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

ITEM 9

o TESTIMONIES:

Mr. Tom Nance. consultant to EPWDC, clarified that over-pumping tests for the last two Honouliuli Wells are near completion and should be continued.

Mr. Kalani Haia of the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council (NHAC) requested to have the matter deferred until the Waiahole Ditch Contested Case hearing is completed. He also requested that the NHAC be included in any round table discussions that may be held. Mr. Haia also stated that NHAC does not object to the water use permit if there is an emergency need in the Ewa plain.

MOTION: (COXINOBRIGA)

To go into executive session after Item #9.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.

REQUEST FOR PUBliC HEARING ON PROPOSED CHAPTER 172. HAWAll ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAR), HAWAllAN WATER RIGHTS

PRESENTATION OF SUBMTITAL: Ms. Lyann Mizuno

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff requested to amend #10, under Revisions, as follows:

10. Subsection 13-172-30(b) has been added to clarify that the right to domestic water for kuleana land does not create an obligation upon any entity to provide service of that water.

Staff recommended that the Commission:

1. Resubmit the proposed Chapter 172, liAR, to the Attorney General and Governor for preliminary approval, in accordance with Administrative Directive No. 94004; and

2. Direct staff to hold a second public hearing and continue the rulemaking process.

TESTIMONIES:

Mr. Kalani Haia of the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council (NHAC) requested to have the footnote: Reppun vs. BWS replaced with P ASH \'S. HI County Planning. He strongly urged that the Commission meet with OHA and the Department of Hawaiian Homelands before any further steps (e.g. public hearing) are taken on the proposed rules.

8

Page 26: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~ BENJAMIN J- CAYETANO OOVtRNOll OF Ho\WAII

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT Of lAND AND NA T\JRAl RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 1'.0.101(12'

HONOlUlU, HAWAII KIOt

(or th meeting of the COMMISSION ON WA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Dec ber 6, 1995 Han lulu, Hawaii

HEARING FOR REV nON OF WATER USE PERMITS Oahu Sugar Company (Well as. 2301-11 to 20 at 2301-27 to 32)

11le Estate of James pbell (Well Nos. 2202-03 to 14) Wai ahu-Waiawa Grou dwater Mana ement Area Oahu

BACKGROUND:

ROBERT 0. GlIWD OAVID A. N08AIGA

LAWRENCe K. MIlKE RICHARD K. cox

HERBERT lot. RICHAAD6. JR.

RAE lot. LOUI. P.£. DEPVIY

On April 22, 1988, the Board of Land an' Natural Resources approved the transfer of 0.5 mgd of "preseIVed use" from OSCo's EP 2 (Well Nos. 2201-03,04,07) to 0.5 mgd of "permitted use" to the City and County D partment of Parks and Recreation (City) for irrigation of the golf course, park, and gr en belt areas of the West Loch Estates project.

On May 17, 1989, the Commission on W ter Resource Management (Commission) approved adjustments to water use permits in the earl Harbor Groundwater Management Area (PHGWMA) to comply with the Commiss on's April 19, 1989 revisions to the PHGWMA sustainable yields. The adjustments pro ded for a 5-year re-allocation plan which incorporated. amongst other items. the c nversion of sugar cane cultivation to wban development as well as the estimated oahu Sugar Company (OSCo) optimum basal groundwater demand.

In a letter dated December 6, 1991, osco submitted a listing of basal weB by weB pumpage requirements for current and projected iqigation water requirements (Exhibit 1). This listing showed a zero (0) allocation for 1W 2; however, as stated above, EP 2 had already been transferred to the City. I

i

In January 1992, the staff completed a review of existing water use patterns and authorized uses for all major water users within the PHGWMA and revisited the scheduled conversion of sugar cane lands to urban lands. Based upon the staff's review, it was evident that

Iten 7

------------~------............... ----------------____________ ... ,._

Page 27: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o Staff Submittal December 6, 1995

additional water use reductions could be applied to OSCo's authorized uses.. Exlu'bit 2 shows the re-adjusted allocations by wells. Because EP 2 was listed in OSCo's breakdown of well by well pumpages (Exlu'bit 1), EP 2 was erroneously included in the re-adjusted allocations for 1992.

On January 16, 1992, the Commission approved the reduction of OSCos allocation in accordance with Exlu'bit 2, subject to the condition that water use permits issued according to the revised schedule be subject to review and adjustment by 1995.

Five (5) of the eleven (11) groundwater sources listed in Exlu'bit 2 are located on Campbell lands. As the leases to OSCo expired during the latter part of 1995, these weDs were transferred to Campbell, pursuant to § 174C-59 Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS). At present, OSCo holds allocations for the remaining five (5) sources.

On November 13, 1995, the staff met with representatives from the City, Campbel1. and OSCo to discuss the scheduled reductioIl$ for 1995. 'nle staff proposed three (3) methods by which the allocations could be adjuSted: 1) in accordance with the 1992 schedule, 2) revocation due to 4-years continuous nonuse, and 3) by applying a lower irrigation water requirement for diversified agriculture (roughly 50% of sugarcane). Exhibit 3 shows the sources, landowners, present permitted use, current 12-month moving average withdrawals, and the three methods proposed for adjustment of the allocations. Because EP 2 is listed in the January 1992 submittal as one of the sources scheduled for review and adjustment in 1995, and because EP 2 has an allocation, albeit to the City, EP 2 is also listed in Exhibit 3.

On November 20, 1995, Campbell and OSCo verbally agreed to the revocation of portions of allocations not used for at least the past four years. By this method, the present permitted use of Campbell's EP 5,6 (Well Nos. 2202-03 to 14) may be reduced by 2.792 mgd and asCo's permitted use of WP 2C,2D (Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32) and WP 4A.4B (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20) may be reduced by 2.982 mgd and 0.695 mgd, respectively.

ANALYSIS Be ISSUES:

For the record, it should be clarified that EP 2 (Well Nos. 2201-03,04,07) should not be subject to the Commission's 1995 review of former-OSCo well allocations since the transfer of this source to the City pre-dated the Commission's 1989 initial adjustment.

Section 174C-58( 4) Hawaii Revised Statutes, provides for revocation of permits by the Commission, after a hearing for flfpJartim or total nonuse, lor reasons other than conservation, 0/ the waler allowed by the permit lor a period of/our continuous yean or more-. Exlu'bits 4-6 show the twelve-month moving average withdrawals at EP 5,6, WP 2C,2D and WP 4A.4B sites since 1980. 11Us submittal fulfiDs the hearing requirement under 13-171-24, HAR for revocation of water use permits.

2

-

Page 28: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o Staff Submittal December 6, 1995

Although there is a legal basis for revocation due to nonuse, a comprehensive review of the groundwater allocations and uses is still warranted in the PHGWMA. Staff proposes to convene a roundtable discussion for the purposes of further revi~w and adjustments to the former-OSCo well allocations in 1996.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff reconunends that the Commission:

1. Revoke the amounts of water not in use for at the least last four continuous years shown in Exluoit 3 UJ¥ler "4-YR NONUSE-.

2. Extend the 1995 deadline flr review and adjustment of the allocations for the wells shown in Exluoit 2 to TDecember 1996 to provide additional time for the staff to complete a compreh~ive review of current and projected needs in thePHGWMA. '

Respectfully submitted,

Attachments

APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:

MICHAEL D. WILSON, Chairperson

3

----------~----------------------------------------.. ,-

Page 29: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

... .. '. r· ! .-.:.J _.. ....

: \ 0 .:. i1 : 3 5

Mr. Manabu Tagomori Deputy Director

December 6, 1991

OAHU SuGAA PO. Box ··0"

O· Watpahu. Hawati 96797 . _ (808)677-3577

d\Jv,fac

commission on Water Resource Management Department of Land and Natural Resources P. O. Box 373 Honolulu, HI 96809

Dear Manabu:

Enclosed are a listing of fields actually withdrawn from Oahu Sugar Company's demise by ~ampbell Estate via Area and Rental Agreements and a list of basal well by well pumpage requirement to total 60.62 MGD when our present allocation is readjusted.

If any other information is required, please give me a call.

Very truly yours,

w. D. Balfour, Jr. Vice President and Manager

WOB:yk

enclosures

EXHIBIT 1

----~----------------__ 4._

Page 30: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LTD.

Recommended Distribution of Revised 60.62 MGD Basal Groundwater Allocation

~oOlau Sub-area: P2r -l 0.000 ...

EP3,4 3.304 EP5,6 8.000 EP7,8 6.813 EP15,16 12.154 WP17A,17B 0.000 wp1 1.151 wp2A,2B 5.594 wp2C,4C 5.594 WP4A,4B 4.000 wp6A,6B 0.000 WP7A,7B,7C 9.000

======= 55.610

Waianae Sub ... area: WP5 0.000 EP10 5.010

======= 5.010

TOTAL 60.620

MGD MGO MGD MGO !'tGD MGO MGO MGO MGO ~GO MGD MGO

MGD

MGD MGD

MGD

. ' .

o o

. ..

~ . A ; •...•.

Page 31: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

m :r: -CD --I I\)

DURM ALLOCATION SCHEDULE

\JELLS (mgd)

1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 ............ = ................................... ......................... ....... __ ..... == OAHU SUGAR COMPANY

EP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EP3,4 5.362 3.887 3.558 3.304 3.304 3.304 3.304 1.919 EP5,6 ".696 10.292 9.963 9.709 8.000 8.000 8.000 6.615 EP7.8 8.514 7.396 7.067 6.813 6.813 6.813 6.813 5.428 EP15,16 19.150 17.596 15.522 14.828 12.154 12.154 12.154 10.769 \JP17A. 178 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 \JP1 1.151 1.151 1.151 1.151 1.151 1.151 1.151 1.151 \JP2A,28 6.7'50 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 \JP2C, 4C 6.250 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 \lP4A, 48 6.478 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 \JP6A,6B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 \JP7A, 78, 7C 13.000 13.000 13.000 13.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000

_.------------_._----------_._._.-------------_._----------------_.-_ ... -._---_._-_._----------Subtotal COSCo) 78.651 68.808

~AIANAE BASAL AQUIFER

\lELLS 1988 1989

65.749 64.293 55.610

O~ ALLOCATION SCHEDULE (mgd)

1990 1991 1992

55.610 55.610 50.069

1993 1994 1995 ~.·m.u .. Aa •• ·.~ •• I ... Ana •••• ~.n.a.a ••• ~ .... ~ ••• a •••••••• u ... ··~ ............................................................ .

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY \IPS EP10

6.000 4.500 4.500 4.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.000 4.700 4.700 1.590 5.010 5.010 5.010 2.564 ._--_.-._-------------_._._.-._.--_._ ... -._---_._.-.--_.-._.--.-_.-.-_._ .. _---.. -.. -.-.. -._----

Subtotal COSCO) 11.000 9.200 9.200 6.090 5.010 5.010 5.010 2.564

...................... ~ ........... =_ ....................................................... a.

Total OSCo. 91.651 78.008 74.949 70.383 60.620 60.620 60.620 52.633 ...................................................... WI&I:a8.: ............. : •• ·u ... • __ ...... __ •• ...... Ia: __ IIIaI.· .... ==.

0

o

Page 32: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

1m SCHEDULE

1995 MAX CONalN\!D 3soonooo WELL NAME 10/31/95 (1992 4-YR. 4-YR. 199'1 DWRM gpd/ac (WElL NO.) WELL OWNER WUP IlMAV DWRM) IlMAV NONUSE

4-va NONUSE (5O~)

(0) (0)

EP 2 (2201~3.04.07) CACDHCD O.SOO 0.976 0.000 0.976 0.000 0.000 0.250 (~.SOO) (5/95) (~.500)

I EP 3,4 (2102~ TO 22) CAMPBELL ESTATE 3.304 0.310 l.919 5.069 0.000 1.919 l.652 0 (-1.38S) (4/93) (-1.385)

EP 5,6 (2202~3 TO 14) CAMPBELL ESTATE 8.000 0.000 6.615 S.208 -2.792 5.208 4.000 (-1.385) (12/92) (-2.792)

EP 7.8 (2202-1S TO 20) CAMPBELL ESTATE 6.113 2.083 5.428 14.075 0.000 5.428 3.057

·m (~.685) (9/93) ('().68S)

X EP 15.16 (2202-11) CAMPBELL ESTATE 12.154 0.319 10.769 15.578 0.000 10.769 6Jl71

:I: (-1.385) '(9/92) (-1.38S) -OJ WP I (2301~1 to 10) OAHU SUGAR l.lSl 1.492 1.151 3.198 0.000 1.151 0.576 - (..().OOO) (1/95) (~.OOO) ..... CAl WP lA,2B (2301-21 to l6) OAHU SUGAR 5.594 0.000 5.594 6.230 0.000 5.594 2.797

(~.OOO) (9/93) (~.OOO)

WP 1C,lD (2301-17 to 32) OAHUSUGAIl 5.594 0.000 5.594 2.612 -2.982 1.612 2.797 (~.OOO) (9/93) (-1.982)

WP 4A.48 (2301-11 to 20) OAHU SUGAR 4.000 0.000 4.000 3.305 ~.695 3.305 2.000 0 (~.OOO) (1/92) (~.695)

WP 7A,7B,7C (2300-21 to 23) OAHU SUGAIl 9.000 5.138 9.000 10.935 0.000 9.000 4.500 (~.OOO) (3/9S) (~.OOO)

EP 10 (2OO6.()l to 11) CAMPBELL ESTATE 5.010 0.63S 2.564 6.579 0.000 2.564 2.505 (-2.446) (12/91) (-2.446)

TOTAL 60.420 26.319 52.634 47.550 30.211 (-7.786) -6.469 (-11.870) (-30.209)

Page 33: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

m X :I: -OJ --I ~

I

Monthly Pumpage EP5,6 (Well Nos. 2202-03 to 14)

20 ... . .. _.--- -.- .. .

-- ... -- ............ - .................................... , ......... - ......... - ............ - ................................................... ...

- -'0.

g 8,10 !-fl-' 11 \----i---------------------nJ 0. E &.

5 ..1.1 __ - - J L - - - - -1- ..I - - - 1-1- - - - - - - - - -

mImTlIIIRgIIIIIIIIID)

date (latest data 10/95)

-0-- monthly pumpage -0-- 12-MAV _ allocated amount

e

o

Page 34: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

m X :::c -OJ --I en

I

10

8

- 6· -- '& E -CD 0) co 0. E &. 4

2 --... ......... - .. .

Monthly Pumpage WP2C,4C (Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32)

.------. -------- ._----_._---_ .. _-----

date (latest data 10195)

_ monthly pumpage -- 12-MAV - allocated amount

e

o

Page 35: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

m X

--~ -CD --4 en

i

-"0 0)

E -

Monthly Pumpage WP4A.48 (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20).

12~--------------------______________________________________________ ~

10 -t.. - . . - . - - - - - - - . - - - - . I· - . - - . . . - . - . - - - . . . . . . . . _. . __ . __ .. . _ . . _ . . _ . _ . .

8 .... - -~- -- ----------------------------~ ... --- .. _--------------------------------

8, 6 .. - III ..

C'O a. E :::l Q.

2 ~ ... -- .. · ... I- ..... -

o 8 IlTrT~frmlTTir4TTTlJm ~1f1TrTH rHH II rrm1lli

date (latest data 10/95)

-0- monthly pumpage -0- 12-MAV - al/ocated amount

\

o

o

Page 36: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

\.

.. +' WALTER M. HEEN, 222 EUZABETH PA MARTIN, 4265 MOSES KN. HAIA III, 6277 TIlOMAS A.K. HAIA, 6484

o

NATNE HAWAIIAN ADVISORY COUNCIL 1088 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Telephone: (808) 523-1445

JON VAN DYKE, 1896 2515 Dole Street Honolulu, HI 96822 Telephone: (808) 956-8509

Attorneys for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

STATE OF HAWAII

IN THE MATTER OF WATER USE ) PE~IIT APPLICATIONS, PETITIONS ) FOR INTERIM INSTREAM FLOW ) STANDARD AMENDMENTS, AND ) PEll'IlONS FOR WATER ) RESERVATIONS FOR THE ) WAIAHOLE DITCH COMBINED ) CONTESTED CASE HEARING ) c:\"'pdoaIl:a1aru~wrm \aCfidavi.OO2

CASE NO. CCH-OA-95-1

OFFICE OF HA W AIIAl~ AFFAIRS

AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS AK HAIA; EXHIBIT "A"; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS A.K. HAIA

I, Thomas A.K. Haia, being first duly sworn on oath, depose and say:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Hawai'i.

2. I am employed by Native Hawaiian Advisory Council ("NHAC').

3. NHAC represents the Office of Hawaiian Affairs in the Waiahole Combined

Contested Case Hearing.

--------------------------------------

Page 37: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o 4. I have prepared testimony th t will be submitted to the Commission on Water

Resource Management at its Dece ber 6, 1995 meeting. (Exhibit "A"). i

5. This testimony, submitted Fn behalf of NHAC and its clients, contains !

reference to the Waiahole Combinfd Contested Case Hearing. I

6. Out of an abundance of ca4tion, I have caused this testimony to be served i

upon all parties to the Waiahole ~mbined Contested Case Hearing in order that

it is not construed as an ex-parte q>mmunication. I

Further Affiant Sayeth Naught.

Subs.:;ti~d and sworD to before mp. this _~ .u.... day of December, 1995.

My commission expires: I ~ ~-0/1

2

------------------~------------------------------------------.. -

Page 38: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o NATIVE HA WAIIAN ADVISORY COUNCIL

'Aha ka7w'o ka ai no ka na'auao. no ke kulaiwi. no ka Hawai'i A Non-Profit 501(c)(3) Corporation

1088 Bishop Street, Suite 1 , Honolulu, III 96813. (808) 523-1445, Facsimile 599-4380 Administrative Office. (808) 261-6318, Facsimile 261-2012

Mala'ai 0 Pa'ala'akai Project, Waialua. (808) 637-6625

Testimony of Native awaiian Advisory Council fore the

Commission on Wa er Resource Management, December 6, 1995 Meeting

(Held at Honolulu International A' rt Interisland Tenninal Conference Room)

Aloha and Good Morning Chair Wilson an

My name is Kalani Haia and I am an ttorney with the Native Hawaiian Advisory Council (NHAC). We appreciate this opportunity to xpress our thoughts and concerns regarding various items that appear on today's CWRM Agen

!

Agenda Item #7 - Hearing for ~vocation of 'Vater Use Permits, Oabu Sugar Company (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20 & 230 -27 to 32), Tbe Estate of James Campbell (Well Nos. 2202-03 to 14), Waipabu-Waiawa G undwater Management Area, Oabu.

NHAC agrees with Staffs recommen tion to revoke the amount of water which has not been in use for the four year statutory peri . NHAC is concerned about what will become of this 6.469 mgd. As we have stated previo ly in our November 29, 1995 letter to Chairperson Wilson and Deputy Director Loui, further di sions and/or the actual re-allocation of this water seems improper as a re-allocation may ect issues presented in the Waiahole Combined Contested Case Hearing.

Therefore, NHAC urges the Co ssion to revoke the 6.469 mgd for non-use. In addition, NHAC urges the Commission to n re-allocate this water until the Waiahole Combined , Contested Case Hearing is completed.

Agenda #8(b) - Ewa Plain Water evelopment Corporation/Tbe Estate of James Campbell: Application for a Well Const ction/pump Installation Pennit, Honouliuli Well &(Well No. 2302-07), TMK 9-2-1:01, and pplications for Water Use Permits, Honouliuli

-

Page 39: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o NATIVE HA WAlIAN ADVISORY COUNCIL

'Aha kiikc'o kanawai no ka na'aULJo, no Ice kulaiwi, no ka Hawaj'j Page 2

Wells 7,8,9 (Well Nos. 2302-07 to 09), TMK 9-2-1:01, future Municipal Use for Total 3.360 mgd, Waipahu-Waiawa Groundwater Management Area, Oahu

NHAC opposes Staffs recommended approval of Well Construction and Water Use Pennits for Ewa Plain Water Development Corporation's proposed Honouliuli Well No.7 (2302-07). NHAC, again, expresses its concern that any re-allocation of water previously drawn by OSCO out of the Waipahu-Waiawa Groundwater Management Area may have an adverse impact on issues presented in the Wai3hole Combined Contested Case Hearing. Therefore, NHAC strongly urges the Commission to defer any further action on EPWDCs Well Construction and Water Use Pennits until after the Wai3hole Combined Contested Case Hearing has been completed.

Agenda Item #9 - Request for Public Hearing on Proposed Chapter 172, Hawaii Administrative Rules (BAR), Hawaiian Water Rights.

NHAC has the following comments with respect to Proposed HAR Chapter 172, Hawaiian Water Rights:

1. Proposed Section 13-172-1 contains a footnote to the Hawaii supreme court opinion styled Reppun v. Board of Water Supply.

NHAC urges the Commission to remove this notation to the proposed administrative rules. NHAC suggests that the more recent Hawaii supreme court decision styled, Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. Hawaii County Planning Commission (pASH) is a more appropriate decision to include in administrative rules pertaining to Hawaiian water rights. The PASH decision contains a clear mandate that all state and county agencies must, to the extent feasible, protect Hawaiian traditional and customary rights. NHAC urges the Commission to replace the cite to Reppun with a cite to the more recent PASH opinion.

2. Proposed Section 13-172-1 provides that the purpose of the chapter is lito establish the framework which will govern the practice and procedure of the commission in discharging its duty to protect native Hawaiian water rights." (Emphasis added).

Although § 13-172-1 refers to "native Hawaiian" water rights, there is no deftnition of the term "native Hawaiian." Rather, the term "Hawaiian" is defmed in proposed §13-172-2 as "any descendent of the aboriginal peoples inhabiting the Hawaiian Islands which exercised sovereignty and subsisted in the Hawaiian Islands in 1778, and which peoples thereafter have continued to reside in Hawaii." As the term "native Hawaiian" has a speciftc legal meaning, it is inappropriate for the term to be freely interchanged with the term "Hawaiian". '" ~

Additionally, proposed §174C-2(3) provides, inter alia, "adequate provision shall be made for the protection of traditional and customary Hawaiian rights." The word "native II does not

Page 40: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVISORY COUNCIL

'Aha !iko'o leanawai no lea na'auao, no ke kulaiwi, no ka Hawai'i Page 3

i

modify the word Hawaiian in the State wt.ter Code and therefore should not appear in the proposed Hawaii Administrative Rules. s noted above, a consistent defined term (e.g. ""Hawaiian" rights) should be used unless a distinction in meaning is intended and expressed.

2. Proposed section 13-172-2 has been modified to designate and defmes traditional and customary practices in a manner that ocuses on "gathering". Traditional and customary practices of Hawaiians are not limit to gathering; traditional and customary practices include a wide range of cultural, sp' 'tual and religious practices, including ceremonial activities. I

The Water Code, specifically §174C- (c), in pertinent part, provides: "[A]dequate provision shall be made for the protection of traditional and customary Hawaiian rights ... ". Any reference that suggests that ditional and customary Hawaiian rights are limited to "gathering" is inappropriate. The defmed t rm should be "traditional and customary practices".

I

Moreover, in Staff Submittal at Paral:> ph 3 - Issues/Analysis (12/6/95) - Staff gives its response to concerns that the rules should e e that water is protected for practices associated with sacred springs and cultural bathing site. It states:

Section 13-172-50 already inc udes protection of stream flows for practices recognized in the Ha ai' i State Constitution, Article XII, Section 7 and the State Wat r Code, Subsection 174C-1D1(c)[.] Both references include the pr tection of traditional and customary rights related to cultural and r ligious purposes.

Proposed section 13-172-50 is entitled "Trad tional and Customary Gathering Rights". Section 13-172-50 continues, "To protect stream flow necessary for such practices, the commission shall manage streams in accordance with ... 174 -71(1), HRS .... " (Emphasis added). Because the word "such" in this sentence modifies the word Npractices" and the title of the section specifically includes only traditional and cu omary gathering rights, this section suggests that somehow traditional and customary practices are limited to only those involving gathering. The Commission must delete the reference to "ga ering" in both §§13-172-2 and 13-172-50 to avoid confusion and ensure that the full scope of ditional and customary practices is protected .

. Further, Staffs above-quoted analysis recognizes the importance of protecting traditional and customary rights related to cultural an religious purposes. NHAC strongly urges the Commission to adopt an administrative rule at expressly acknqwledges and protects water uses associated with traditional and customary c ltural, spiritual and religious practices, including ceremonial activities. For example, we w uld suggest that the defmition of traditional and customary rights be modified to include as xamples of rights - traditional practices in sacred springs and cultural bathing sites. This chan e would directly address concerns over limiting the scope of defmed traditional and customary p ctices. Such a change will also illustrate that the Commission is cognizant that traditional and customary rights are not limited to gathering.

Page 41: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o NATIVE HA WAlIAN ADVISORY COUNCIL

'Aha kaKo'o kanawai no ka na'auao, no ke kulaiwi, no ka Hawai'i Page 4

NHAC must strongly object to the current draft of the Hawaii water rights administrative rules. The sweeping changes proposed by staff have eliminated a number of critical elements required to adequately implement protections of Hawaiian water rights.

Recommendations to limit reservation requests to the Water Commission and the Chairperson of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, elimination of reference to traditional and customary agriculture, and deletion of the subchapter on fishponds totally subverts the good faith efforts of the Hawaiian Water Rights Task Force. Before these proposed rules go out for public hearing and comment, the Hawaiian Water Rights Task Force should be consulted - if not reconvened.

The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (aHA) is charged with taking action for the betterment of conditions of Hawaiians and native Hawaiians pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes, section 10-3. aHA is authorized by Hawaii Revised Statutes, section 10-3(4) to H[a]ssess the policies and practices of other agencies impacting on native Hawaiians and Hawaiians and conducting advocacy efforts for native Hawaiians and Hawaiians." The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, as trustee under the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920, is charged with protecting the interests of its beneficiaries. Therefore, additional consultation is needed from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs and Department of Hawaiian Home Lands before any further steps are taken on these proposed rules.

c:\wpdocs\kal ani\cowrm\ll 06m tg.tst

*espectfully submitted,

lid T.A. Kalani Haia On behalf of: NATIVE HAWATIAN ADVISORY COUNCIL

Page 42: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

WALTER M. HEEN, 222 .. ELIZABETH PA MARTIN, 4265 ., MOSES K. N. HAlA, m, 6277 THOMAS A. K. HAlA, 6484 NATIVE HAWAIJAN ADVISORY COUNCIL 1088 Bishop Street, Suite 1204 Honolulu, HI 96813 Telephone: (808) 523-1445

JON VAN DYKE, 1896 2515 Dole Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Telephone: (808) 956-8509

Attorneys for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs

o

BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

STATE OF HAWAll

IN THE MATTER OF WATER USE PERMIT ) CASE NO. CCH-OA-95-1 APPLICATIONS, PETITIONS FOR INTERIM ) INSTREAM FLOW STANDARD AMENDMENTS, ) CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE AND PETITIONS FOR WATER RESERVATIONS ) FOR THE W AIAHOLE DITCH COMBINED ) CONTESTED CASE HEARING )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this date, a copy of the foregoing Affidavit of Thomas A.K. Haia; Exhibit' A '; and Certificate of Service were duly served upon the following individuals by depositing a copy in the individual jackets located at the Commission on Water Resource Management:

Michael D. Wilson, President Officer clo William M. Tam, Esq. 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 227 Honolulu, HI 96813

Alan M. Oshima, Esq. Yvonne Izu, Esq. Oshima Chun Fong & Chung 841 Bishop Street, Suite 400 Honolulu, HI 96813 Auomeys for AMFAC JMBIWA1AHOLE

IRRIGATION CO.

Michael W. Gibson, Esq. Douglas S. Appleton, Esq. Ashford & Wriston 1099 A}akea Street, Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 Auorneys for The Eslale of James Campbell

Stephen K.C. Mau, Esq. Cheryl A. Nakamura, Esq. Rush Moore Craven Sutton Morry & Beh 745 Fort Street Mall, Suite 2000 Honolulu, HI 96813 Allorneys for Mar'. A. Robinson Trusts

Gary M. Slovin. Esq. Karen L.S. Stanitz, Esq. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel 1099 Alakea Street. Suite 1800 Honolulu, HI 96813 Allorneys for Dolc!Castle & Cooke

Rick J. Eichor, Esq. Deputy Attorney General Department of the Attorney General State of Hawaii, 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Allorney for State of Hawaii Depanrnent of Land and Natural Resources!

Depanrnent of Agriculture

Jan N. Sullivan. Esq. Don S. Kitaoka, Esq. Takeyama & Sullivan 11 00 Alakea Street, Ste. 311 0 Honolulu, HI 96813 Attorneys for Halekua Development

Corporation and West Beach Estates

Mr. Kiyoshi Masuda. President Koei Hawaii. Inc. 1·94 Sakuragaoka. Y~ity Osaka 581. JAPAN Koei Hawaii. Inc.

Mr. Howard H. Hamamoto. Receiver Royal O'ahu Reson, Inc. 1088 Bishop Street. Suite 1214 Honolulu, HI 96813 Royal O'ahu. Inc.

Pu'u Makakilo. Inc. clo Roben M. Creps Post Office Box 78 Honolulu, HI 96810

Paul M. Sullivan, Esq. Pacific Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-7300 AlIOmey for Depanrnent of the Navy

Nathan T. Nalori, Esq. Carlsmith Ball Wichman Murray Case & Ichiki Suite 2200, Pacific Tower 1001 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813 AlIOmey for Nihonkai Lease Co., Ltd.

George K.K. Kaeo, Jr. Esq. Deputy Attorney General State of Hawaii 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Anomey for Depanrnent of Hawaiian Home Lands

-

Page 43: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

Colbert M. Matsumoto, Esq. e Matsumoto, LaFounraine & Chow Suite 2000, Amfac Tower 700 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Anomey for Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation

Del Monte Fresh Produce (Hawaii), Inc. Attention: Roger McCloskey Post Office Box 200 Kunia, HI 96759

T. Lowell Wolf, Esq. Deputy Corporation Counsel Department of the Corporation Counsel Honolulu Hale 530 S. King Street Honolulu, HI 96813

Dr.. Fred Madlener Hawai'i's Thousand Friends 46-196 Yacht Club Street Kane'ohe, HI 96744

Paul Benco, Esq. 1188 Bishop Street, Suite 3408 Honolulu, HI 96813 Anomey for Hawai'j's Thousand Friends

Auorney for Planning Department, City and County of Honolulu and Board ad Water Supply

Dan Davidson, Esq. David Callies, Esq. 700 Bishop Street, Suite 1928 Honolulu, HI 96813 Anorneys for Land Use Research Foundation

Denise E. Antolini, Esq. Paul H. Atchitoff, Esq. Lea Hong. Esq. Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc. 223 S. King Street, Suite 400 Honolulu, HI 96813

Alan T. Murakami, Esq. Arnold L. Lum, Esq. Paul F.N. Lucas, Esq. Carl C. Christensen Melissa W.L. Seu 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1205 Honolulu, HI 96813 Auorneys for Wailihole·WaiKline Community Association, Hakipu'u 'Ohana', Kahalu'u Neighborhood Board. and Ka Uhui Hawai'i

Benjamin A. Kudo, Esq. Christine A. Low, Esq. Dwyer Imanaka Schraff Kudo Meyer & Fujimoto 1800 Pioneer Plaza 900 Forst Street Mall Honolulu, HI 96813 AnorneyS' for Kamemahema Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate

DATED: Hooo',". H,w,;;. D,,,,mbe, 6. '~

WALTER M. HEEN ELIZABETH PA MARTIN MOSES R.N. HAIA, III THOMAS A.K. HAIA JON M. VAN DYKE

o

Attorneys for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs C:IWPDOCSIWAIAHOl£\PLDGSlCOS

2

Page 44: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o MINUTES OF TIlE MEETING OF THE

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

DATE: TIME: PLACE:

January 16, 1991 9:00 a.m. Kalanimoku Building Board Room, Room 132 1151 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii

ROLL Chairperson Paty called the meeting of the Commission on Water CALL Resource Management to order at 9:09 a.m.

The following were in attendance:

OTHERS:

MEMBERS:

EXCUSED

STAFF:

COUNSEL:

Mr. A. Morisako Mr. Jim Eychaner Mr. Barry Ching Mr. Tom Nance Mr. Dan Jenkins Mr. Jim Wriston Mr. Max Shoura Mr. Brian JJurke Mr. Shiget1u Yoshizaki Mr. Rich Pedrlna Ms. Helen,Garrigan Mr. SamulH Keala, Jr. Mr. Gen ~orita Mr. Futo~u Kuji Mr. A. Locricchio Ms. Majorie Ziegler Ms. Mary Prothro

Chairperson WUliam Paty Dr. Michael Chun Mr. Robert Nakata Mr. Richard Cox Dr. John Lewin

Mr. Guy Fujimura

Mr. Manabu Tagomori Mr. George Matsumoto Mr. Edwin Sakoda Mr. Glenn Bauer Ms. Sherrie Samuels Mr. Roy Hardy Mr. William Rozeboom Ms. Sharon Kokubun

Mr. William Tam

Mr. Rick Fontaine Mr. Chester Lao Mr. David Martin Mr. Michael Burke Mr. Hugh Morita Mr. DanLum Mr. Cheng Hsin Chang Mr. Tim Ayau Ms. Francine Duncan Mr. Raymond Pedrlna Ms. Shari Berinobis Mr. Bob Imose Mr. Nama Morita Mr. Teoni Black Ms. Clara Olds Ms. Donna Wong Ms. Shannon Wood

(Although items are shown in a numerical order, some items were moved up to accommodate the applicants.)

ITEM 1

----------------~------------------------------------......................

Page 45: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

t o REVISION OF OAHU SUGAR COMPANY'S GROUND WATER USE PERMITS. PEARL HARBOR WATER MANAGEMENT AREA. OAHU

Mr. Sakoda revised the recommendation on the request of Oahu Sugar Company because they were not comfortable with the words "interim permits":

"That the Commission approve the reduction of OS Co's allocation by 9.76 mgd to 60.62 mgd subject to the condition that water use permits issued according to the proposed revised schedule shall be [interim permits] subject to review and adjustment by 1995."

Mr. Sakoda stated that staff's main concern was that the permits be reviewed by 1995.

Mr. Cox mentioned that this was a substantial decrease from what was given earlier. He understood OSCo still used a large amount of sw-face water Jicensed from the state and asked If that was lost would OSCo need to go back to their original approval for water use. He asked OSCo's representative for their comments.

Mr. Michael Bw-ke said they could Jive with the reallocation as amended by staff. In the numbers on the pump by pump allocation, as the numbers become tighter there would be a need for flexibility between pump allocations. The posslbJity of the state withdrawing their water would remove substantial water from the Walahole System.

Mr. Cox recalled that the BWS hasn't always followed their pump by pump allocations and asked Mr. Sakoda if formal or informal adjustments had been made. Mr. Hardy repJied that allocations and needs were matched as much as possible but adjustments need to be made from time to time. The numbers are not absolute In the sense that In a month by month pumpage, the numbers given are yearly averages. Hopefully, within the time period the numbers would remain within the averages. When reviews were made of all the major water users, OSCo. stood out as having the most "cushion". In discussions with OSCo., they agreed upon the reduction to the present allocations.

Chairperson Paty asked where pumps 15 and 16 were located. These pumps had the biggest reduction from 19 to 10 mgd. Mr. Bw-ke said those pumps were just mauka of H-l, between Waipahu and Makakilo. These pumps irrigate the Ewa plains, which partially supply the Kapolei City and Kapolei Village area. Pumps 3-8 all work together with 15 and 16 as one major system. As long as there is flexibility In the total amount it would be a workable number for OSCo.

Mr. Martin submitted testimony and recommendations (see attached). He asked for the Commission's view on the concerns expressed.

Chairperson Paty understood that they would like to see broader distribution of discussion. Mr. Martin replied that that was correct, a broader distribution of discussion and recognition of other rights that may need to be discussed.

Mr. Nakata asked if people are standing in line for this water. Mr. Hardy asked if Mr. Nakata meant as far as actual applications for water use, there were none at this time. Although staff has been asking for information regarding updates for future demands.

Mr. Nakata felt NHAC's recommendation was appropriate and that the Commission should look at it.

-5-

-- , --------------------~------------------------------------

Page 46: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

-' "

IreMJ .

o Dr. Lewin asked for the status of applications to the CoWlty regarding future water use in that area because the Commission has heard some concerns that there are applications for water exceed what can be provided. Mr. Hardy said he can't answer for the County in so far as what's available in the Hawaii Water Plan because that is more of a long-term plan.

Chairperson Paty recognized that by cutting the use down by 9 mgd does not mean there will be 9 mgd for someone else to use. New wells should be developed and utilized.

Mr. Tagomori commented that like the West Hawaii area, there have been numerous discussions with the BWS in terms of what kind of applications are being requested for their system. Discussions are also ongoing among the major landowners about their water needs. Much of this information is in the Oahu Water Use and Development Plan and it is being reviewed. If there is to be a reallocation, there will be a formal process through the com~1 sion.

Chai rson Paty wanted to assure that Mr. Nakata's concern that NHAC's sugges ion be incorporated In the Plan. Mr. Tagomori replied that public hearin and other processes will be followed.

I

Mr. Co asked If the reduction of total approved uses to 185 mgd by 1995 was stll being looked at. Mr. Tagomori said they are looking at such a plan.

Unanl ously approved with the amendment proposed by Mr. Sakoda and with t understanding that there Is some nexibtUty on individual pumps for OS o. and that staff start looking at long-range plans as suggested (Cox! hWl).

I

Referring to the Division of Aquatic Resources preference for an overstream Installation If possible, Dr. Lewin asked bow it would affect the Commission's general policy In terms of the trade-offs in reducing construction costs to developers versus a policy which mitigates environmental effects that could occur.

Ms. Samuels stated that under the Instream Program a poUcy statement and management plan is currently being developed. A draft Including recommended policy will be available for the Commission sometime this year.

Mr. Cox recalled approving the installation of the sewer system and asked if that project should be coordinated with this project so as not to cause disturbances to the stream at two different times. Mr. Matsumoto stated that the coordination is currently taking place. Mr. Cox stated that he did not notice any referral to coordination of projects In the recommendations. Ms. Samuels said it was not added because she was told the agencies involved were coordinating the matter.

Dr. ChWl suggested the representative for the Department of Transportation (DOT) could possibly make a statement to that effect.

Mr. Harold Yoshizaki SEY Engineers, representing the applicant, responded to the DAR's preference for overstream utntty lines coordination between

-6-

.-

Page 47: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

State of HawaO COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Department of Land and Natural Resources Honolulu, Hawaii

January 16, 1992

Chairperson and Members Commission on Water Resource Management State of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii

Gentlemen:

Background

Revision of Oahu Sugar Company's Ground-Water Use Permits

Pearl Harbor Water Management Area. Oahu

On May 17, 1989, the Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM) approved adjustments to water use permits in the Pearl Harbor Water Management Area (PHWMA) to comply with the CWRM's April 19, 1989 revisions to the PHWMA sustainable yields. The adjustments provided for a S-year reallocation plan which incorporated the conversion of sugar cane cultivation to urban development as well as the estimated Oahu Sugar Co. (OSCo.) optimum basal ground-water demand.

Staff Review of Existing Water Uses

Staff reviewed existing water use patterns and authorized uses for all major water users within the PHWMA. Additionally, the sugar cane land conversion to urban land schedule was reviewed. Discussions and meetings were held with all major users to verify information on water uses. Based upon staff review it is evident that additional water use reductions could be applied to OSCo.'s authorized uses. Under current operations, sugar cane land taken out of production has occurred as scheduled and as anticipated from the May 17, 1989 CWRM action. Under current crop conditions, which reflect the 1989 reallocation plan, OSCo. basal ground-water requirements are currently 60.62 million gallons per day (mgd). This is 9.76 mgd below OSCo.'s scheduled 1992 authorized use from the 1989 S-year plan. OSCo. has agreed that 60.62 mgd would be adequate for their uses in the foreseeable future.

A well-by-well reduction of water use permits has been discussed with OSCo. to achieve the least amount of negative impact to them. The attached table shows the readjusted allocations by wells.

ITEM 6

,

I -

Page 48: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~"~Bon~M~B o

I

Commission on Water Resource Management January 16, 1992

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Commission approve the reduction of OSCo.'s allocation by 9.76 mgd to 60.62 mgd subject to the condition that water use permits issued according to the proposed revised schedule shall be[wIAAI PIAni~ subject to review and adjustment by 1995.

;~~~ ~ .ka;.,.., ~~. Respectfully submitted,

t::~-G.Iz.A @--t.:..--~~-Chief Engineer

Attachment

APPROVE~MnTAL:

WILLIAM W. PATI, Chairperson

2

I

Page 49: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

-

\

IlELLS 1988 1989

DIiRM ALLOCATION SCHEDULE (mgd)

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 :==========================================-=========_==aa:============--==_z:=====-==_========

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY EP2 EP3,4 EP5,6 EP7,8 EP15,16 1IP17A, 178 lIP 1

1IP2C: B

4C 1IP4A, 4B 1oIP6A, 6B 1lP7A, 78, 7C

Subtotal (OSCo)

IlAIANAE BASAL AQUIFER

WELLS

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.362 3.887 3.558 3.304 3.304 3.304 3.304 1.919

11.696 10.292 9.963 9.709 8.000 8.000 8.000 6.615 8.514 7.396 7.067 6.813 6.813 6.813 6.813 5.428

19.150 17.596 15.522 14.828 12.154 12.154 12.154 10.769 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.000 0.0

1.151 1.151 1.151 1.151 6.750 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 6.250 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 5.594 6.478 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

13.000 13.000 13.000 13.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000

78.651 68.808 65.749 64.293 55.610 55.610 55.610 50.069

1988 1989

OWR" ALLOCATION SCHEDULE (mgd)

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 ===================================a==--============================_===========================

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY lIPS EP10

Subtotal (OSCo)

6.000 4.500 4.500 4.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.000 4.700 4.700 1.590 5.010 5.010 5.010 2.564

13.000 9.200 9.200 6.090 5.010 5.010 5.010 2.564

======================================cas-___ ==== ... ================-::=:_======:====::========= Total OSCo. 91.651 78.008 74.949 70.383 60.620 60.620 60.620 52.633

======:====::=====:=====-:========================================:============:==========:=:==

.. ; J

o

Page 50: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

: # .-,

. ,_. r· .-. U

t "< S #_ .... .' __

; .. \ 0 .:.d: 3 5 .,J: - • _J' •

Mr. Manabu Tagomori Deputy Director

December 6, 1991

Commission on water Resource Management Department of Land and Natural Resources P. o. Box 373 Honolulu, HI 96809

Dear Manabu:

OAHUSUGAA P.O. Box "0" waipahu, Hawaii 96797 (808) 677-3577

dl\nnfac

Enclosed are a listing of fields actuaxly withdrawn from Oahu Sugar Company's demise by Campbell Estate via Area and Rental Agreements and a list of basal well by well pump age requirement to total 60.62 MGD when our present allocation is readjusted.

If any other information is required, please give me a call.

Very truly yours,

D~OJ2 W. D. Balfour, Jr. Vice President and Manager

WDB:yk

enclosures

a_

Page 51: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LTD. Recommended Distribution of Revised 60.62 MGD

Basal Groundwater Allocation

Koolau Sub-area: EP2 0.000 EP3,4 3.304 EP5,6 8.000 EP7,8 6.813 EP15,16 12.154 WP17A,17B 0.000 WPl 1.151 WP2A,2B 5.594 WP2C,4C 5.594 WP4A,4B 4.000 WP6A,6B 0.000 WP7A, 78, 7C 9.000

======= 55.610

Waianae Sub-area: WP5 0.000 EP10 ~.010

======= 5.010

TOTAL 60.620

MGD MGD MGD MGD MGO MGD MGD MGD MGD ~GD

MGD MGD

MGD

MGD MGD

MGD

i ~ _ .

o ." ,., D , ..a j .,','

-

Page 52: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

- It OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, L~ .. • Campbell Est~te Sugarcane Acreage Withdrawals

and Cessation of Cultivation on Lands Supplied With Water from the Pearl Harbor Water

Management Area Basal Aquifer

Area and Rental Effective Date Field Cane .~rea Agrmt J Date Signed Number withdrawn ======== ====~==== ======== ======== ========= Completed Agreements:

61 5/31/88 8/16/88 57 0.197

62 5/26/88 11/10/88 48 33.95 46 9.62

63 9/21/88 1/19/89 69 63.9

64 4/16/89 3/8/90 80 4.571

65 5/1/89 3/8/90 77 114.65

66 11/10/88 318/90 76 40.195 81 94.55

Pending Agreements: 68 4/.16/89 14 52.86

70 6/13/90 16 55.113

71 10/20/89 74 59.14

73 10/19/89 35 0.086

74 11/18/88 69 65.586 72 78.82

75 11/12/88 92 76.85

76 10/26/90 93 36.42 -77 4/23188 57 146.266

78 4/10/89 14 )

17 )

18 )

19 )

21 ) 829.328 41 )

42 )

43 )

45 )

46 )

79 5/2/89 20 21.25

80 5/1/90 12 139.09

81 10/19/90 86 2.067

83 10/12/90 64 87.842

Page 53: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

ROLL CALL

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

DATE: May 17, 1989 TINE: 2:00 P.M. PLACE: Kalanimoku Building

Board Room, Room 132 1151 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii

Ch irperson Paty called the meeting of the Commission on Water Re ource Management to order at 2: 15 p.m.

The follow ng were in attendance:

Chairperson William W. Paty Dr. Michael Chun

ST FF:

OTHERS:

Mr. Richard Cox Dr. John Lewin Mr. Guy Fujimura Mr. Robert Nakata

Mr. Manabu Tagomori Mr. George Matsumoto Mr. Edwin Sakoda Mr. Dan Lum Ms. Sherrie Samuels Mr. Sterling Chow Mr. Roy Hardy

.Mr. William Tam :Mr. Bert Hatton : Mr. Mark Cramer ;Mr. Sam Keala

I

Mr. Quentin Kawananakoa Mr. Kazu Hayashida IMr. Hugh Morita Mr. Linda Rosehill Mr. Dean Anderson Ms. JoAnn Yamada Mr. Charlie Reppun Mr. WiIliamson Chang Ms. Lori Nishimura Mr. Peter Nottage Mr. Nelson Lee Mr. O. K. Stender Mr. Eric Onizuka Mr. Ron Uemura Mr. Rhanda Kim

I

Ms. SaIlie Edmunds Mr. Richard Porlocke Mr. Dan Davidson

:Ms. Mina Morita

Mr. David Oshiro Mr. Brian Kim Mr. Tats Fujimoto Mr. Les Hoag Mr. Clark Champion Mr. Herbert Minakami Mr. Jim Wriston Mr. Michael Burke Mr. Andy Yamaguchi Ms. Cynthia Takahashi Mr. Brad Mossman Mr. Clarence Tanonaka Ms. Meredith Ching Mr. Miles Nishijima Mr. Douglas W. MacDougal Mr. Wally Miyashira Mr. Matt Higashida Ms. Patrice Tottori Ms. Susan Miller Ms. Carol Wilcox Mr. Kelvin Kai Ms. Elizabeth Martin

I

Page 54: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o

APPROVAL OF MARCH 19. 1989 MEETING MINUTES

Unanimously approved with the correction on page S, "mdg" to mgd" and replacing "sustainable yield" with "water allocation" on page 8 (ChunlFujimura).

BESUBNlTTAL; ADJUSTMENT TO PERMIITED USES. PEARL HARBOR WATER MANAGEMENT AREA. OAHU

Mr. T"omori recommended the following amendments to the "Staff

:~::s"ReCOmmendation":

I

First paragraph, line S: delete "October 1990", insert "December 1990".

Third paragraph, line 3: delete "coincides", insert "incorporates Oahu Sugar's current optimum water demand of 81 mgd".

Recommendation

Item I, insert after the last word: "(for the Waianae Aquifer, the sustainable yield is 2S mgd)".

Delete Item 2 in its entirety.

Item 3: delete "reduction", insert "adjustments", delete "final termination of an Oahu Sugar lease or sub-lease, whichever occurs later", and insert "discontinuance of agricultural uses".

Item 4: after "adjustment" insert "for the Waianae Aquifer by December 1990 and the Koolau and Schofield High-Level Aquifers".

Mr. Tagomori introduced Roy Hardy to assist in answering the questions of the Commission.

Mr. Cox asked if the numbers for the million gallons per day shown on the exhibits is a limit each day or the average over the year. Mr. Hardy replied that it was on the average over the year. Mr. Tagomori added that this was consistent with the management of the Pearl Harbor Ground Water Management under Chapter 177.

With regard to the floor amendments, Mr. Fujimura asked if the concerns of the ujajor users had been addressed. Mr. Tagomori replied discussions with the ujajor users addressed all of the significant concerns.

Mr. Cox asked if the in-district sources should also be eliminated to reflect amendments made by the staff. Mr. Tagomori agreed that would be consistent with the amended recommendation and that all references (In-District Source, Export to Honolulu, Export to Ewa-Waianae) wherever they occur in the exhibits should also be deleted.

In regards to the Recommendation I, Chairperson Paty asked if the 2S mgd, instead of the 17 mgd, was in keeping with the Commission's indication to reexamine the sustainable yield of· the Waianae Aquifer. Mr. Tagomori agreed that the review by 1990 would allow for additional pumpages over 17 mgd for the interim. He also added that BWS will be allowed more flexibility to select wells to meet certain needs.

Mr. Fujimura asked if it would be possible that the amount of water used be higher at a given moment than the number staff has cultivation practices. Yes, replied Mr. Tagomori. Would it be possible to continue agricultural use

-2-

I

Page 55: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

but with a lower water use crop. asked Dr. Chun. Mr. Tagomori answered that replacement crops would be permissible. Mr. Bert Hatton of Oahu Sugar Co. commented that although staff has worked with them on coming to agreeable numbers. there are still some concerns about Oahu Sugar and other plantations around the State because this is the first major reallocation decision that tbe Commission is making. He stated that they have preserved uses. existing uses. and that these should be protected beyond prospective uses and he did not believe they are being protected if the action is taken. He added he was also concerned with their allocations for the two pumps in the Waianae Aquifer which is proposed to go from 13 to 9.2 mgd. Their actual Waianae usage ~r day in 1988 was 11.5 mgd. They are currently refurbishing a booster pump in that area and planning to plant an additional 100 acres to cane to solve a tax problem. Therefore, if their allocation is raised to 25. they can plant the additional acreage. He is also concerned about the schedule over time of the take-downs of cane and would like to have the staff continue working with them on a regular basis.

Mr. Kazu Hayashida of the Board of Water Supply. in looking over the reduced pumpage figures for export to Waianae and Honolulu questioned if they could do that. He asked the staff to work with them to see if they can meet the 92.01 to 87.41 reduction. Chairperson Paty assured Mr. Hayashida that the staff would work with him.

Mr. Cox mentioned he understood that the pumpage from anyone well could be adjusted provided the pumping did not interfere with nearby wells. Mr. Tagomori agreed that staff regularly evaluates pumpages to assure there is no interference to the surrounding wells.

Mr. Oz Stender of the Ewa Plain Water Development Corporation commended the staff and Commission with dealing with the issue. He also stated that although no one will be completely happy if the Commission adopts what is presented by the staff it will be a step in the right direction. Mr. Stender added that Oahu Sugar's remaining a viable operation is important and that withdrawals should dovetail with plantation operations. Ewa Plain Water Development will work with them on whatever problems occur. They would also like to work towards more precise information. therefore they propose additional studies be made to confirm or determine the aquifer limits and would like to offer their participation in that process.

Mr. Charlie Reppun stated that the allocations should be done under the Water Code - to allocate water someone should request the water. stating what the water is to be used for. criteria to be met, etc. He has not heard of BWS applying for a permit and whether all the changes are being done under the permit process (Mr. Reppun then quoted from the Water Code rules). He stated the Commission did not have the legal right to cut Oahu Sugar's water back if no one applied for a permit and by turning the planning process to an agency of the City whose policy is "first come first served" it will be a "planning mess". Mr. Reppun added that by allocatirig up to the sustainable yield without a margin of error, the Commission is not following proper procedure.

Mr. Fujimura suggested the question be addressed to Mr. Tam.

Chairperson Paty stated registration questions would be answered on the registration item on the agenda, but Mr. Tam could comment.

Mr. Tam stated there are two laws that are in effect: Chapter 177 is in effect until July 1st. Under 177. whether preserved uses or permitted uses, under water shortage section there can be modifications of those permits. Section IV talks about interim permits that will be in existence under the Code and for new designated areas: there has to be applications but it is not clear under the statutes whether existing uses in an existing water

-3-

I

Page 56: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

- o

management area are deemed to be existing applications and therefore given priority over a new decision.

Mr. Reppun commented that if allocation is cut back on one party it cannot be given to another party without their coming in for a permit, especially no if permit was formally requested. He asked what the BWS was going to use the allocation for because under the Code a use will need to be stated.

Mr. Hayashida answered that the statement was not correct because by the Code it would have to go by project to project and by looking at their records, which are public records, whatever information is needed is available.

Chairperson Paty intervened by saying the Commission would take Mr. Reppun's comments into consideration on their deliberation of the item.

Mr. Reppun stated he knows BWS does not have to come on a project by project basis, but also that it was not the intent of the Code to get a blanket allocation. He would still like to know about the margin of error on allocations. He would like answers to these two questions.

Mr. Cox asked for clarification if the BWS allocation is going up or down in the proposal and that if there is a reduction they would have to come in for a permit for additional water. Mr. Tagomori, referring to the tables, replied that there is a reduction in the allocation and that the Board would have to come for a permit for new withdrawals.

Mr. !gomOri added that in 1984 Oahu Sugar's allocation (11S to 92.S mgd., a 22.S mgd. reduction over a three-year period) was reallocated under Chapt 177 by the Board of Land and Natural Resources due to reduction in plant don size from 18,000 acres to 14,000 acres and change in irrigation met from furrow to drip.

Mr. R ppun commented that the bulk of the reallocation is coming from Oahu Sugar, almost 30 mgd He then asked if that 30 mgd. is automatically transferred to BWS because theoretically it is available for someone else to claim since everyone is not cut back equally ..

Dr. Chun replied he did not see it that way. Dr. Lewin added that the overall water use is being reduced over a period of time and that everyone except the military is gradually reduced; Oahu Sugar is where the bulk of the reduction is coming from.

Chairperson Paty said the staff is trying to come up with the best balance and ir)tend to do everything they can to assure that Oahu Sugar will not suffet any reduction in yields on lands that they are currently farming. The Ewa Plains people, the staff, all involved are trying to take care of the situation.

Mr. Hayashida wanted to clarify his statement "first come, first served" is made on the basis of the Land Use planning by the City Council, so your land is properly zoned before water is given to you. It is not a haphazard decision, it's tied into the Land Use Plan. The actual allocations given to the BWS will be through a water use or withdrawal permit system.

Mr. Hatton added that withdrawal of water from Waiahole Ditch would . create a water shortage and Oahu Sugar would need to pump more water. It is not a problem at the moment but it may be in the future.

Dr. Chun moved to accept staff recommendations as amended. Mr. Nakata asked to amend Recommendation 1 to add "subject to review by December 1990" at the end of the recommendation.

Unanimously approved as amended (ChunlFujimura).

-4-

I --------------~----------------------------____________ ................... J, ..

Page 57: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o State of Hawaii

COl\ll\lISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Natural Resources

Honolulu, Hawaii

Chairperson an Commission on State of Hawaii Honolulu, Haw

Gentlemen:

May 17, 1989

Members ater Resource Management

RESUBMITTAL Adjustments to Water Use Permits

Pearl Harbor Water Management Area, Oahu

Changes in ground water conditions, irrigated acreage, irrigation practice, and t e recent downward revision of sustainable yield in the Pearl Harbor Water M agement Area (PHWMA), has resulted in the need for adjustments to xisting permitted use.

Staff Analysis

On April 1 mmission revised the sustainable yields for the Koolau basal aq 'fer and the chofield High-Level aquifers downward to 165 mgd and 13 mgd, respectiv y by the year 1995. Action on the recommended 17 mgd sustaina Ie yield r the Waianae basal aquifer was defered to further study until no ter th ctoben of 1990. Until the sustainable yield of the Waianae basal a uifer is revised, the Commission will manage the permitted uses of water in the PHWMA within the recommended total sustainable yield of 195 mgd targete for 1995.

As a result, staff has prepared a schedule of adjustments to existing water use permi s to meet current and projected changes in water use. Numerous meetin s and discussions were held with the major water users to formulate this hedule, in an effort to avoid and minimize undue hardship to existing water u ers and planned de.!llopmen~s. (lwca..J ,,~~;......_ ..J...k..,

The propo d sched ot_til Bting water use permits on a well source basi ,was eveloped from information supplied by the major water users. The sch dul coincide~ with anticipated changes in water use resulting from duction in Oahu Sugar Co. 's irrigated acreage in Ewa plain .caprock area an planned urban growth throughout the PHWMA.

Prior to th Water Code, existing water use permits were conditional and subject to revie • Also, it is not clear whether the water use permits allocated under hapter 177 HRS, for ground water control areas, are valid to continue as n w water use permits because of the due process in awarding permits under a ater management area. It is additionally unclear, through comments of majo water users, as to what constitutes an existing use based on previous per 'ts under Chapter 177 HRS. Therefore, water use permits granted under t e proposed schedule should be issued as interim permits in accordance with he Water code and Administrative Rule 13-171-20(b).

ITEM 1

-- I

Page 58: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

• Achairperson and Members A "Commission on Water Resource Management" May 17, 1989

The proposed schedule of permitted water use for the Pearl Harbor Water Management Area are summarized below from the details of Exhibits 1, 2, and 3.

1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

OSCo 91.65 78.01 74.95 70.38 70.38 70.38 70.38 62.40 BWS 92.01 87.41 87.41 87.41 87.41 87.41 87.41 87.41 Military 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13 Private 8.05 7.55 7.55 7.55 7.55 7.55 7.55 7.55

Total 219.84 201.10 198.04 193.47 193.47 193.47 193.47 185.49

RECOMMENDATION:

That the lmmiSsion adopt the proposed schedule of permitted water use tabulated in Ex "bits 1, 2, and 3 by user, well source, and aquUer for the Pearl Harbor Wa er Management Area, subject to the following conditions:

(1) That "thin each a~r_the ~ota1 p'ermitted use shall not ~eed the s ,stainable yiel'"\{ -f-O~""""~~4~~

(2) IThat IY water aVailabl~;oca~n; be OriD-district us~ o.ij"t.-I~

(3) That cheduled ~duction~ to Oahu Sugar Co. permitted use shall be initiated upor\lfinal tennination of an 0Sc0 lease or sub-lease. whichever occurs~'''U'';''~ d 7~J.",...n-I ... l>l:' -

(4) That permits for water use issued in accordance with the proposed schedule shall be interim per s subject to review and adjustment

('1"by 1995.

~.~A·6t~ ~Jy q<;~ fk.-v.-;;;J:;.. * t-U-­d~~--" , ,

Attach. I

APPROVED FOR ~UBMITTAL

T , Chairperson

e ectfully s~, ~

d\£I~ MAN BU TAGOMORI Depu Director

-2-

-------------+---------------.

Page 59: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

• • 0

PROPOSEU SCHEDULE OF INTERIH WATER USE PERHIT

WULI

.".

KOOLAU BASAL AQUIFER

.,,,

DOVAlt

''',.n' AII~1t i "' UII SC .... 1t h, ..

.". "'1 "91 ."3 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8: ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

OAHU SUC •• CO"PAII' [Pi

[".4 OS., [P7,'

EPIS," UP I7A, 11. VPI

VPl., 'I VPlC, 4C VP4., 41

V"A, .. VPIA, 71, 7C

• 00. • 0 .. Sl.' , 887

II.'" IIUl I Sl4 7.'"

I' U. 17'" . ,.. .., .. I. UI I. UI , 7" S. "4 '.1" ,.,,. '.411 4 .. .. '.00' ... ..

13 ... U .. ..

. ... , '" , '" 7 U, IUI~ 1.3 •• I.m ,.". ,,,. 4 .... . ...

Il ....

• ... • ,It • II. , 304 1 '04 , ]14 , 119 , '" , 719

, IU , 'U • IU 14.lll 14.lI 14 III • lot • 30. • , ••

I. lSI lUi ... " ,.,,. , "4 S "4

'''4 , "4 '''4 4.... 4 .ot 4 ... ..... ..... . .. .

U'" Uti. U .. .

'.Oot '.304

'7" • IU

14 121 .., .. I.UI

'-5" uu 4,ot . .. .

Il ... .

• 000

I fI' I ll4 , 411

Il u, . , .. I lSI

, "4 '.m 4 ....

..ot Il 0 ..

........ _---------_ .. _----------------------------------------_ ..... _ .... _----....... _-------...... _----------S.Und .OSC ••

HONOlUlU 'VS

\.!1..'Oill'iCI s,ore;;!1 luil V.III II

Vu,.~. hll'

Vu,i. "" Vtl" 'fI'. CII, S,.II 'fI'. CII, V.llt I Pflr. Ch, Vtllt II V.in Vtllt Hto" •• Vtlh VllI.h Vtlll I 1""'1 v.lI. I Air. 'Ilea Aifl Utili Hal.,. Veil, V.i,iI Hu I V.I,1t NU II

'flrl CiI, III ~1111 .. i Vellt

II.UI

I. In '.00' t u. I.ll'

• '1' un IIU Uot ..... 1.10.

'.79' I. n. 1.00. ..... I .... U .. I. tt.

.. ....

un , fl. '.Ut I.ll. '.llt I. Itt

1.1" I 50. ..... 1.1 .. 1.791

I.U' Uti ... .. Uti .. '" 2.911

6$.74'

lzul , .... '.u. I '21 '.'11 I. Itt ... 11 15 .. .... I.U'

'.7f' In. ... .. ..... I .... U .. l.tI.

64.'91

IU' , .... .. U. I.,,. '.,It I. Itt 1..11 I.n. ..... I 1ft

'.7,. I.". I. ... . ... z .... ., .. I.'"

'4.1tJ

un , .tt

• m 1.32.

"'" 2.111

II" 1.5 ..

• Oil 1.1 ..

'.n. I.U' Itt. · ... 2.1 .. U .. 2.1 ..

I U' , ... • 'H. I 121

• lit 1111

I ." Ult ., .. lilt

• 7" I Il. 1.1t

• .It , ... , ,It

1.9M

64.1"

1.'61

" .. ..U. Ill. '.311 1.111

1.1" 1.$" ..... 1.11. .. n. 1.131 I .... . .... 2.1 .. U .. 2.111

un , ... .u. I.3l1 • lit

l.'" ... 11 I SO •

'.011 1.1 ..

'.79' I 13. I'tt • 'tl

I ". .., .. l.fI' -------_._--------------------------------------_._-------

SoUud ' .... 'n'"

G.,." It H ..... l.i] M.Jawa S .. " r .... 11 hll' III .... llell, ....... , llelll lad ....... 111 v.lll" hU, II la ... lli hUI II

lUll

lUll I.'"

11.1$'

U.'" l.lIt ..... .....

lUll

IU!t I. '"~

u.n. II.'" I.ItI . .... ... ..

lUll

II.JlI I.'"

11.'" U.97' lilt U .. . ...

Il.n. I.'"

11.1$' II.'" I.U. ..... .....

lU .. ZUII

lI.n. IU29 I.'" I ft.

II . 7,. II . 7S1

II . '71 II ". I II. I II. ..... ... .. ..... ..tt

lUll

lUff I.'"

11.1$' II.'" 1.11. .... .....

ZUII

II n. I '" 11.1$' lit" 1.111 .... ..... ...... __ ._--- ---------------_ .. _---------------

..huu•1 Ul"'" It H ... ltI.U 8.,1,. It E ... ·'at"!iJ

Illia "enl I NII .. I ,.nl

41.11'

, .... UII

H.14'

US7 6.611

H.I4I

US7

'.61'

'1.141

un ,.'"

l'.I4I

U" Uti

H.I4I

US7 , u.

•. 14'

4.3" Uti

H.I4I

4.3$'

'.U' . __ ... _-.... _- ...... _--------------.. --..... _-------_ .... _------_ .. -... _----------------------.

til" h.,ell lIaee '" RIIII.a' II ... , ••• II

".,11 "n III ~iliI .. 1 ,

lI.ut

I .... 2.1 .. • IS. • II.

I •. '"

I.'" 2.111

• IS • ... 11

II.'"

I.'" 2.1 ••

• IS •

'.1"

II.'"

I .... 1.1 .. •• SI

'1 ..

I •. ",

UII Uti .m •. II.

I •. '"

I .... Uti .m '.It •

11.9"

I .... 1.1t. .. ,. . It.

II.'"

I.'" 2.1 .. .. ,. "'tI ._---_.--------------_ ............. _--.. _._ .... _-.. _--------_._ .. -_._--_ .... -_ ... .

S."ud 4.'" 4.'" I 4'" 4.'" 4.nt us. 4.'" I .1" h",ell' i

_____________________ ;:_~:_:_::_~._;;_~_;;_ .. _._ .. _._ .. _ .. _._.;_;~_;_·4;_··_-_-;_;~_~;_;_··_··_;_;-_,_;;_·T11·_;_;~_~_; __ ._;_;-_~;_;_ .. _ .. _;;_._~;_; ___ ;_._'J_;._._.-_;;_~_;_;· _______ EX_H __ I_B_I __ T __ 1 ______________ ..

Page 60: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

.. •

o St&te ofHa ...

DEI'AaT:'dEtfT or LAJfD All., HATULU. IlSouaCIS Divisloa 01 W.ter aa4 LU4I De"lopment

Honolulu. H ....

3. 11, 1t11

Chairman and )le.ben Boerd of Land and ~aturll aetlOUrea State of Ha.aU Honolulu. Ha.aU

aentletMll:

aESUBIlUTTAl. Tel':Ds of Water WiUidi'a.il iild UM Permits

Tbe Depanment'. Admfnfstnt1" aule. on lJ'Ouncl .ater control reCluUe that tbe 80ucI speclfy the period. or clundoft of pesta and the COIIUIlencetMnt and co.pletton date. for the coutructloa of POWld .ater sources. After 1n ... tiCation and study of tbls matter. DOWAtD fI ready to make speeUlc: rec:oaamendations for adopdoca by the 8ou4 of Land and Natural aellOurces.

The Ground Water Use La" sp.dJles that permits may be tuuecl up to a awdmum of SO years and ano.. tor ext.ns1oft of the penalt alter one-half of the permit periocl hal lapsecl. The staCt Ia re<:ommencllnc tbat the duration of ,each permit be establllbecl at tw-17 (20) Je&l'S with a review '"IT Ave years by tile loud to detel'lllllDe ooaapl1lDc:a with proYUfona of the pel'lllit. The staff fH&a tbat 20 ,... II a rae_able t1aIa for recvJat:lnc crowad .ate .. llitbclra .... 8IUI usa at Uda e&I'l7 .... 01 the ' propaa. Aa the D.partment ..... aperilDce lD powuI .ater repiadoD. the cluntIoIa of the pendta ..,. be nY1en4 .. 4 acllu,*, .. appropriate III the futun. " ,'.". ;' ... "

'.~~ ~.~. ," ~ ,< ' ,,~ .... ,.' '. ,

On the OOMl&I\CllHDt and cocapletloD data. the ItaIt ~._. that a period of 24 IICIDW be established tor coapJiIdAr the .... eIopMDt of the IJ'OUftd .ater~. This consuuetIGa ,.rIocl II • NaIOMble tiM for drWinC. testm" and for the IutaIJadoD 01 perunent pWltp. encl eoatl'Ols to fully brln, the IJ'Owad .a. IOUI'Qe Into operatkln. The puIocl .. y be extenclecl upon a showtn, of pod causa ad iood fGth perforsunce. The permit and aonstl'Uctioa data Mould ca ••• Dce OIl the date the permit II Issued by the Department.

It .. I'ICIOaIHIlded that tile &boY, te~ be "c!ud1Hc1 for all water wlthclnwal &Ad use peradta IuuecI ..,. 1M Boari, subject to acIIuahleDts requincl by the Boarcl Cor &Dy pII'IIIlt.

aEC06I'IIINDAT lO!'f :

That the Board establish the terms of ,-round water withdra.al and use permits at 20 years (:oca the date of Issuance of the per::dt with a dve-yeu Board revi.. to c1etermine compliance with lbe provisions of the penalt and tbat tbe development of tbe rround water sou:rce be completed "tthln 24 months from the date of perealt Issuance Cor all permits issued by tbe Board. subject to adjustlDents nqui:'ed by tbe Board for any permit.

anacb.

APpao? ~ua~ITT.u

st:~U ~NO. Chair:.:an

-....-~ OBOT T. CHUCK

)lanapr-CbJef EnJi.",Hr

~., ......... ., a.. ........ ......... • .......... heIII ..

'fJolP4

B12

ITEM 0-1

Page 61: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , -II

----

State 01 Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCD

Dlvi.ioa of Water and Land Dne10plDeat BoDOlulu. HawaU

April 11. 1.10

Chairman aDd M_ben Board of LaDd IDd Natural R.sourc: .. State ofHa..u Honolulu. Hawaii RESUBMlTTAL

O.aUelDea: (Deferred It .. D-2 of Marcb 21, 1910 a .. dDl)

Cer1UlcatlOD of Water WUhdrawal. IDd U ... Pearl Hubor O","nd Water Control Ar .. , Oahu

The Peul Rubor Growld W.ter Coiltnl Area (OWCA) wbleb 1Dclud •• th. Ewa aad Wahla .. Judlclal dl.trlcta. wu dulpated lor Stete r.ptatlOD by th. Boud ." LaDd IDd Natural RHOuroe. (BLHa) ill SeptelDber 1.,. under authority of Chapter 177. HRS. IDd the Dep~eDt of Land &Ild Na~nl Resource. (J)LHR) ReptatloD •• Tb. ratubtory procldur .. call lor the BLNR to certify ext.tinl water withdrawal. aad u ... and to I •• u. permits for Dew IrouDd water deVelOplDlDt. ln the Pearl Harbor Ground Water Control Ar.a. .

The u .. n of water wltblD the P.ul Harbor Oround Watar Control Ar .. have .ubmitted records of pumpa •• to tIte Department IDd from the .. subaJttal. the &DOW withdrawal. IDd auiIIIua dally p~pa •• fol' Indlvtdual w.lla aDd/or w.U field, u.· tabulated a. sbown ill the attached ·C.rttflcatloD of Wat.r Withdrawals aDd U ... • which II made a part bereof. AI a r .. ult. the foUowtnll1 recolDlD.nded for cer1UlcatloD 01 extaUnl u.e.:

!!!!!. Boud 01 Water Supply U.S. H • ., U.S. Anay ,rift" Oabu Supr Coatpany

Total , !

blltiDl U .. Avera,. Annual

(a,d)

71.'50 21.310 5.451 '.151

111.000

224.413

Oahu SUIU Company .ublDitted flpr .. wb1ch axe .. d.d the 115 IDld Uste4 above but b.caul. their .ublDta.iOd repre •• nts unmeasured pumpal". the Deput­ID.Dt' •• tafU. recocamend1D. that US IDld be certlfled. Oahu Supr. in the lDeantlaa. wtU lnve.Ulate the matter aDd U d .... d nace •• ary wtU requut that the Board bold • lwarin. a. ta allowed under SactioQ 4 •• of RefUlaUoD • of the Departm.nt 01 Land and Natural Resources.

JmCOMMBNDAnOH:

That the Board cuUfy the ~st1n1 u ••• aDd quantity of withdrawal for each well a. Indicated ID lb. attach.d ·Cert1ftcadon of Water Withdrawal. aDd U ••• • dated Aprtlll. 1910 which r.ftlCtl the rlCOllllllended withdrawal qUIDUty a. follow.: Board of Water Supply at 71.95 IDld; U.S. Havy. 21.35 mid: U.S. Army. 5.455 mid; Privat •• 5.851 mid; IDd Oahu SUI"" Company. 115.0 mid: subject to tb. provisions of applicable law. and rule. and relulatloa ••

Attacb.

APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:

17 az,... ~mW ONO. Cba1rm1D

~~ .. ~/ ~ .. ROBUT T. CHUCIC ~ .. p.~ • Manalar-Chlef EnllDeer ~. ~ ",1It·~ .,;..).. "'" / ....

~", . .,., _"" ,AI ,,).,-~.

11[11 D-2

A5

Page 62: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~-'_"7''' _______________________ _ ' - ..... _- .

• • I I I I

• I

• • • • , , , ~ , --

1-10TION

Based on the submittal of the staff dated

April 11, 1960, I move that th, Board approve the issuance

of conditional certification to the major users of the

ground water who have filed the prescribed declarations,

in the amounts recommended by the staff in its submittal

dated April 11,1980, subject to the "following:

1. Submi~sion by each,user of a water use

plan, meeting the management objectives and policies of

the Board, within 3 months from the issuance of such

objectives and policies by the Board in the State's water

management plan.

2. Approval of the water use plans by the s'oard.

3. Rftview of the conditional certification

~ithin the next 3 years.

4. Reduction in the quantity of water conditionally

certified in the event that such water is not being bene­

ficially used as defined by law or that the water use plan

15 not being implemented effectively.

5. Adjustment in quantity, in the case of Oahu

Sugar, upon the installation of a new and more accurate

metering system, but in no event will said adjustment exceed

the amount of the 1979 withdrawal as contained in the declared

use attached to the submittal.

A6

Page 63: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

t 1

I J

U_/Jeune ...... .0 ...

cwrv JUGAA CO. I ....... WP, ··JUl-II .... IPI _l-t1. N. ". IP I •• IltJo-II ..... U I IP I •• 12n-a .. It EP t •• p.a-II .. I.

ZP lI. I. 1212-11 I .aJdW

.,. 1 •• 11. lI. U .... II .. U .... I WPlfA wt-u WPU. JIIfotJ .....

., WJI' I 1111-11.11 I WP lA •• hI~I1" II WP IC. 4C • ·If. II WP 4&. 41 hII-U" •

.1IIpa1II

I WPIA •• ICJHI. I. WP fA. 'I, TC ISIt-n ID "

.2'O'1'AL. (OaIua .Ia ..... Co.) ........ - . -.

I .a.utD or .A1'D srgPU

Ift-J)bItrict IGanee

I KUDia .eIlI D UU"'U •• , Wapalna WeD.I UI~111D .. VapID H,u. Walla 1' ..... 11. II Pauol C!t7 Sbaft Je ..... u Pauo. C117 We.Da I IU ..... , •••

I ...,.. CiJ1 Walla D 2U,...11D ., WIJav wella un-IIID 11 Newtow1I Wella 1 .. 11 ID II WaiaIaN Wella I U.I-••• II X8DIIOh1 w.ua I USI-SI. II

I I I ,

.... ., ....... DIPAIlTllllN1" or ~ AD IlATUaAL usouac:a

c:ut1rlClm:~ •• 11111 WI11IDL\ • .u.s AND UIII hulH ,a...- ..... c. .......

~AprII 11.1'"

-011

I wtdutnW~. .... i-7--Na1

.l ...... )~ Awnp 1m

WeJb .,.. . Clad} flM'll' u ..

....Dl8tr1c1 . • Ap •• "" lI.m u .... U ... ........ s Ap. 1.- J._ Uti Ap.

II Ap. n.TII 11.1'. '.m Ap. II Ap. 11.111 U •• I. lI .... Ap.

• IP t. Ap. If' t. Aer. IP •• Daa lI._ ... " '.n. If' '. DID.

I Ap. IC .... 1I.S" II.UI Ap. I

11 Ap. U.IM 1I.tIt 11._ Ap.

I Ap. I." I.m Lm Ap. I Ap. 1.111 I .... I.UI Ap.

I Ie=I!I!W !

I. n.. I 1. .. I .... lone .... • Ap •

I ..... '.1" '.tII -., • Ap. '.111 .. - '.nt -. 11 Ap ...... Ap •• IIId.. . ~ U.NI '.111 '.M a»-•

I. Ap. I ..... . .... '.111 Ap. I Aft, 11.111 11.111 II .... .Mr.

11. I.J.n • m.I" w.". ,

.... DInrict

I JIaa. S ... '.1" ..... .... • .... 11.11 ...... •.• n .. . I IIUIl. •• 11 '.51' '.13' 11_. 1 IIUIl. l.lI 1.2SO 1.211 11_. I 11_. I." ..U. '.111 IIUIl. a lIa. .... 1.111 I.ut IIUIl. a MUll. .... ' •• 11 1."1 JIUIl. I 11_. ••• '.21' 1 •• 5 • IIUIl. I lIa. .... '.OH ' •• 00 IIUIl. I MUll. •• 11 1.110 1.100 MUll.

A7

-........ Mni_ ....... A".,..,.

DIIQr A...a ::I, ( .... , ,-,

1 •• _ ""'.ftI ( .IS."" I." _.us ( 1 •••• ) II." l.tS'.U1 ( 1.1a) SI.IM •. HI." ( U .... ,

12._ 1.II7.U' ( •• 110 IS._ . ..... , .. ( 11.110)

.... ..UI._ C lC..U)

I.. ...US ( 1.DI) 1.ltt m." ( I.ut)

1._ --. ( 1.141) 11." ..... ( •• Mf) .. - I ...... ( '.at)

11." a._.m ( '.UI)

1'.ltI I._.m ( '.n.) 1I.JJI S ....... t 1I.tll)

IM.III G.m .... CUI • ...,

1.111 111.- ( ..... , 1.21' l.flL" ( ..... ) 1 .... III. tit ( '.P') 1.- .. 1 .... ( 1.JlO) 1.U' W.I" e '.UI) a.alt '".SO ( 1.110) I.SH 111.- e 1 .... ) 2.nl la.I" ( I.'SO) 1.'" 1'.1" ( ..... , 1.111 .. 1 .... e 1.100,

Page 64: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

J

J

I

I

I

I

-. I ,

u .... /Sourae .... Walt Ho.

AHa Olllelt USJ.fS. II .u.. wen. ms-tI.tf ....... .u. ... " ... ...... a,ta ...... I ...... JI.H ............... ....... haI'l CICr (PaliaaMa) ... ... .......... ..... .. " ...... _ .... II U

ItIIMItal Ga-JNnIUI)

bpaIt ......... .......... JUHI aa-u. ..... JIIIooII.n 1taIa.- ..... ...... " .......... W .... HI""",, II. II .. 11 ~.eDa I111-Jl. H ...... W ..... .......u ... .KaaaoId Wella II UM-f1. ., II

...... (Ixpart ... .,.., .......... xuaaa w.u. I ..,..1 .. " R_w.u. IIOI-It .. II Subtotal Cbport ........... )

TOTAL 0kIard of Wala' '1IPP!7)

'l'a&aI Wen. 0"

S .... I .... I .... I .... » .... 1 .... • .... I ....

a

I .... i

• .... • ... • -. I .... I -. I .... ,

II

• .... • -, 11

ff

I I

f)EClAUD D1SrurG_VA PaaDYDUI. I

WltllclnWaI ........... .... 17-- Msrt_ I'«IIl A ........ A.,.... 1171 ~ MDtIaI J)..., ,

~~) (an) (lid) U. (ad' ( .. ) (.~l I ID-IIUtrtciI

I." .... .. '" J&L 1._ SIl.HI ( '.710) I." 1.111 l.at ... 1.m 1'II.Nt ( l •• n) I.a 1.ttI 1._ ... 1._ liS .... ( 1.100) .. .. - - .... - - ( - ) I .... - - ... - - ( - ) -.. ~ - - ... - - ( - )

1.121 1._ ... .... Lilt •• ( 1.1.., 1.11 I •• 1.- ... 1.- ·l.ID." I I.nt) I

II.U II ..... D._ G." ........ u.u.

r-r; II •• u.at I ... ... II.'" uu._ ( I .. JIO) J ... 1.111 1._ .... LUI 111 •• ( I.IH) u.. 1I.11t n.. ... 11._ . ..... ( 1I.nt) 11.11 U.III n.'" ... II." .. .. - ( U.ff') I." .... I.ut ... LUI ".111 ( ioU" 1.1f '.Ift .. -.... 1.- 1 ..... ( U • ., _I." 1.1ft 1._ ... 1.- 81,'" e 1.18)

0.14 a .... ca._ ... .. 11.111." ( a . ..., .. ~~ ..... I.ut .... .... II ...... 1.71 ..... ( C.ll" 1 .... •• ut 1 •• 1_ -. H._ I.Cd .... ( '.111) , .. 0 U._ 11._ IS._ '.UL. ( Uoat)

111 •• u.,. fl .... Ut.aI lI.on.fll ( fI.'1I)

AS

Page 65: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

J

I I I I I I

., 1

Uler/Souroeoe lilt. WeD Mo.

JaU'f"''f

AnrI SdldeJ4 .... 0.1 ... 1) Itol-12 to ". 1.

JiI91' ...... 11Id ISSI-I' .... 1Ull .MIl 2214-'1 B.,..,... ft ..... 1l.S-" H .......... USf-J2

I.... (MWF'

toTAL CIIDba7'

PJUVAD usus

CAII~ 1 ... 14 1155-1S ...... DJJ-H

Del ..... ~. IIIs-1f JttJ-II HQ-tl ......

a.. _I-It

...... CaaIla7 c:a. .... I.SS-Il

1CaIIIu ..... c.. III 11'1-11

...... c-t1'7 au 111-1 JUt.H

WIIiIMDo 'l'rq. I'eJIoQI 1'l-lA.1a 11.,..1. U .. ~ lit UII-U u... JJNo-JI

'f~. D.T. ut-I I .. I-n

Al!plo ........ 2451-11 ISS ... "

Gon. Georp USI-" un·1I IU ... "

UiDuIl. E. 1.14. IUS-"

laIwIIoto. Idwud M. USI-,.

EawUlO. TDehio '''''11 " __ •• al ... 2351-41

TOTAL R'ritr ... 0 ... ,

'lOrA!. WJ'1'RDU.A!..PIAKL.IlAUOA OWCA

,..... W.U. UN

~ l1li.

1 1IIl. 1 MU. 1 1Ul. 1 IIW.

4

1 bI4. 1 bI4.

1 Ap. 1 Ap. 1 ... 1 .... 1 ~

1 OGle

1 0tMr

I oaa.

1 Ap. 1 Ap.

1 Ap.

1 ... 1 ... 1 .0-. 1 ... 1 ... 1 Ap.

1 ... 1 n-. 1 Do..

IS

.J

.I DICLUm DlntNO us. ....QYlDUlI

W,thdra." W"",11 ...... .. ,- ....... T...a A.,... ...

~) .. A ......... 1m (::, A--s ::) C~) ( ... t u.. (IW)

J

In-Dl8tIteI

11 .... '.Ift I.cii l1li. ... 1 •• 1.1ft ( I •• n, 21.'. 1""1 II." MIl. ILlII ••• 1 .... e IS.IOO) It.1II f.WI I .... JUl. It.1II I ...... ( 1.11., I .... 1."1 1.111 .... I •• 111." e 1.111)

11.m ..... •. u. MIl u_

II .... ( • IH,

St.f" 11.10 11.11' N.'" \ f.fll. III ( 11.J'0)

n.f" It. lei I .... S n.1II •• m.as e ••• 1)

!II DlItrict

1.111 . .... ..... bI4 • 1.114 ..... ( ..... ) I.~ 0.'11 .. ". .... I •• 117." e '.tll) I." - - Ap. - - e - , 1._

1.ln 1.121 Ap. I •• "'.HI e 1.111) ..... '.111 '.1M ... .... ".111 e '.DO

••• ..111 '.IA .... .. .., 1. .. e .... ,)

•• itt '.I1f '.1It ocw ••• .... e '.aII, Ia-DWtrtGt

••• '.m - oaur - .... e '.122)

..... •. U. '.112 0I.IMr '.IM l1.at ( '.112'

..... '.lC' ..U. 0Cber '.m .... c '.111)

..... '.fa ..... Ap. .... I ••• " e ..... , '.If' ••• Sf .. -Ap. ..... 141 •• f . . ..., - ..... ..... Ap. '.m I.UI e '.NI) - - - ... - • -- - - »-. - • -- - - »-. - • -- - - ... - • -- - - DIa. - • -- - - Ap. - • -- - - ... - • -- - - DIa. - • -- - - Do.. - • -

11.111 1.115 I.U' '.IIC I.HI.l11 , 1.'11)

.. 1 •• 1. IU.I" nl.1I1 ." .... 1l.'l'.f" (11 •• 413)

A9

Page 66: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO GOVERNOR OF HAWAII

o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF ~ND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON W~TER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , P.O. BOX 621

Ms. Tamara G. Edwards Oahu Sugar Company, Limited 700 Bishop Street, Ste. 501 Honolulu, HI 96813

Dear Ms. Edwards:

HONPLULU, HAWAII 96809

January 15, 202

GILBERT S. COLOMA·AGARAN CHAIRPERSON

BRUCE S. ANDERSON MEREDITH J. CHING

CLAYTON W. DELA CRUZ BRIAN C. NISHIDA

HERBERT M. RICHARDS, JR.

LlNNEL T. NISHIOKA OEP\ITY DIRECTOR

2301-11 to 17a.let

We have received the fully executed pennits Well Construction Pennit to Abandon/Seal WP 4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17). This completes the regulatory process for the sealing of these wells. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

LN:ss

If you have any questions, please contact Lenore Nakama at 587-0218.

~.d~ ~~L T. NISHIOKA

Deputy Director

Page 67: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

+ .. o o OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

700 Bishop Street, Suite 501

January 2, 2002

Ms. Linnel T. Nishioka Deputy Director

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: (808) 543-8520

Fax: (808) 543-8528

Commission on Water Resource Management Department of Land and Natural Resources State of Hawaii P. O. Box 621 Honolulu, HI 96809

Re: Sealing of the WP-4 Wells (State t-Jos. 2301-11 to 17) in Waikele Gulch. Oahu. Hawaii

Dear Ms. Nishioka:

'I.." 1": 3 pj: 40 ~>k. ; '; ,I, j

[" ",

Pursuant to your letter, dated December 11, 2001, enclosed is a fully executed Well Construction Permit to Abandon/Seal WP 4 Wells, Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

Vice President

Enclosure

---------------------_ .. -

Page 68: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)
Page 69: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

- o Q

WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT TO ABANDON/SEAL WP 4 Wells. Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17

In accordance with Department of Land and Natural Resources, Commission on Water Resource Management's Administrative Rules, Section 13-168, entitled 'Water Use, Wells, and Stream Diversion Works", this document permits the abandonment/sealing ofWP 4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17 at Waikele, Oahu, TMK 9-4-02-08, subject to the Hawaii Well Construction & Pump Installation Standards (1123197) which include but are not limited to the following conditions:

1. The Chairperson of the Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809, shall be notified in writing before any work covered by this permit commences.

2. The permit may be revoked by the Commission if work is not started within six (6) months after the date of approval or if work is suspended or abandoned for six (6) months, unless otherwise specified.

3. The owner or operator of any well which has been determined by the department or voluntarily declared by the owner or operator to be abandoned as defined in § 13-168-2, after written notification, shall be required, at owner's or operator's expense, to re-case, cement, plug back, cap, or otherwise repair the well or fill and seal the well with cement in a manner approved by the commission.

4. The well construction permit application is incorporated into this permit by reference and is subject to the Hawaii Well Construction & Pump Installation Standards (January 23, 1997; HWCPIS). If the HWCPIS are not followed and as a consequence water is wasted or contaminated, a lien on the property may result.

5. The Well Abandonment Report form (attached) shall be submitted to the Commission on Water Resource Management within sixty (60) days after completion of the work.

6. The permittee shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, and ordinances.

7. Special conditions in the attached cover transmittal letter' are incorporated herein by reference.

Date of Approval: January 31, 2000 Expiration Date: When well is sealed in a manner

acceptable to the Commission

I have read the conditions and terms of this permit and understand them. I accept and agree to meet these conditions as a prerequisite and underlying condition of my ability to proceed. I also understand that non-compliance with any permit condition may be grounds for revocation and fines of up to $1000 per day.

Permittee's Signature: _2>.L-..,L......Jy---'c~£..:;...£-___________ _ Date: DEC 1 7 2001

P"nredName: JAMAR~~~ Contractor's Signa ~

Firm or Title: OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

U"'nse .r;.. 1£,2>,( Date t2/z1jd / I

/

Printed Name: Melvin E. Lima Firm or Title: Mel's water Works Hawaii, In ,~~.~

Please sign both copies of this permit, return one to the Chairperson, and retain the other for your ~Ofds. .)

Attachment c: USGS

Department of Healthl Safe Drinking Water, Wastewater, and Clean Water Branches Honolulu Board of Water Supply

(.,j

-0 ",

c...v ;-\

J:.. c:::>

Page 70: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

e o

Page 71: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO GOVERNOR Of HAWAH

o o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Ms. Tamara G. Edwards Oahu Sugar Company, Limited 700 Bishop Street, Ste. 501 Honolulu, HI 96813

Dear Ms. Edwards:

P.O. BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809

December 11, 2001

Well Abandonment Reports for Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17

GILBERT S. COLOMA-AGARAN CHAIRPERSON

BRUCE S. ANDERSON ROBERT G. GIRALD BRIAN C. NISHIDA DAVID A. NOBRIGA

HERBERT M. RICHARDS, JR.

LlNNEL T. NISHIOKA DEPUTY DIRECTOR

2301-11 to 17.wap

We received your w,n Abandonment Reports for the WP 4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17) on November 30, 2001 and acknowledge that they are complete.

Our records show that work on this project proceeded without a fully validated permit being returned to our office. Please return a fully executed permit to our office within the next thirty (30) days.

Please respond to the above item(s) within thirty (30) days of this letter's date. Failure to do so may result in fines of up to $1000 per day.

If you have any questions, please contact Lenore Nakama of the Commission staff at 587-0218.

LN:ss

c: Mel Lima, Mel's Water Works

Sincerely,

LINNEL T. NISHIOKA Deputy Director

/

-----------------------------_ ... -

Page 72: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

MEMO and R!uTE SLIP

1. Pum~ Tests Check Glenn Bauer

Step-Drawdown Test:

followed WCPI Stds 0 0 analysis attached 0 0 proposed pump cap o.k. 0 0

Aquifer Pump Test:

followed WCPI Stds 0 0 T & S analysis attached 0 0

Well Interference: estimated Steady-State drawdown at 1-mile radius is ft.

analysis attached 0 0

Stream Surface Water Impacted: 0 0

2. Construction Check Mitch Ohye _+-__ -

data complete followed WCPI Stds well database updated

I

£1, 0 /0 0

~r 0

o 12/03/01

If no, describe deficiency

~

... If yes, identify most probable stream

If no, describe deficiency

b ( £./

3. Char'ee~yanvJ (initial) take action based on above analysis

ATTACHMENTS FOR PUMP INSTALLATION PERMIT: 1 COVER LETTER

2 PERMIT (2x)

3 DOH COMMENTS

4LAND DIV. COMMENTS

5WCR2FORM

6WURFORM

~ not necessary - only WCP.

To be sent to applicant

---------------------------__ 11'4-

Page 73: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

November 28, 2001

Ms. Linnel T. Nishioka Deputy Director

700 Bishop Street, Suite 501 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: . (808) 543-8520

Fax: (808) 543-8528

Commission on Water Resource Management Department of Land and Natural Resources State of Hawaii P. O. Box 621 Honolulu, HI 96809

Re: Sealing of WP4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17) at Waikele. Oahu. TMK 9-4-02-08

Dear Ms. Nishioka:

'\ ',:-::' j G P 3: \ 5

Enclosed are executed Well Abandonment Reports for the sealing of the captioned wells in accordance with the CWRM-approved specifications.

Thank you for your assistance on this matter. Should you have any questions, please call me at 543-8521.

Sincerely,

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

/~cC/ Tamara G. Edwards Vice President

Attachments

cc: Melvin E. Lima (wI encs.)

Page 74: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o Q

State of Hawaii For'Official Use Only:

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Natural Resources '1 ; ;::: ': 38 p 3: I 5 WELL ABANDONMENT REPORT 01-64 11-13-01

i:--

Instructions: Please print In ink or type and send completed report (with attachments, if applicable) to the ,\' Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission may', not accept incomplete reports. This form shall be submitted within 60 days of the completion of work. For assistance, please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump Installation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further information and updates to this application form, visit http://WNW.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm.

1. State Well No. ___ 2_3_0_1_-_1_1 __ Well Name WP-4 (Well 11)

2. Location 1 Address ___ W_a_ik_e_le_G_u_lc_h ____ Island ___ Oah_u ___ TMK

3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. Name of driller who performed work

4. Type of Rig 1 Construction Pump Rig 1 Tremie Pipe Date of well sealing completion

Finished Grade Elevation 22 . 77 fl.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • Sand/Cement Ratio _1_,_1_

~ +-- Casing Diameter 12" in

9-4-02:8

Mel Lima

Nov. 2, 2001

M easured Depth of Blank Casing __ 4_6_ft.

Total Measured Depth 440 ft.

Remarks: 1 .

2. ------3'.

Well Abandonment

-- Measured Depth -I Measured Depth of Open Hole

Finished grade elevation is the top of casing flange.

Total depth is from the top of casing flange.

of Perforated Casing None ft.

394 fl.

50 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

Contractor (print) Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. C-57 L' N C-18254

d ;-- ,J :-7 _______ _ ____ /~--- IC. o. ________ _

Signature ___ 2 ~ Date -_lLt_?-L?+-C£l ______ _ Applicant (print) OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

----~-------------------

BY(/)~ --- --vfsrcrem---------Signature

/

WAR Form (2/8/00)

/

Page 75: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o Q

State of Hawaii For Official Use Only:

COMMISSION ON WATER R SOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Nat ral Resources

. I I. ", ')r'1 I li. dJ p3' , .

WELL ABANDONMENT EPORT 01-64

11-13-01

Instructions: Please print in ink or type and send completed repo (with attachments, if applicable) to the Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honol lu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission may not accept incomplete reports. This form shall be submitted within 160 days of the completion of work. For assistance, please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump In allation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further information and updat s to this application form, visit http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm.

1. State Well No. 2301-12 Well Name: WP-4 (Well 12)

2. Location 1 Address Waikele Gulch Island Oahu TMK

3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc' i Name of driller who performed work

4. Type of Rig I Construction Pump Rig I Tremle Pipe Date of well sealing completion

Finished Grade Elevation 23.04 fl.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • SandlCement Ratio _1_1_1_

---f> ~ Casing Diameter 12 n in

9-4-02:8

Mel Lima

Nov. 2, 2001

M easured Depth of Blank Casing _5_3_ft.

Remarks:

Total Measured Depth 478 ft.

1 .

2.

i

P: Measured Depth f--

~ Measured Depth of Open Hole

Finished grade elevation lis the top of casing flange.

Total depth is from the t~p of casing flange.

of Perforated Casing None ft.

425 ft.

------3. 110 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

Well Abandonment Contractor (print) Mel's Waler Works ~' •. ' aii Inc. ------~~-~ -~-

Signature ~ ____ _ ~_ . ~'---"

C-57 Lic. No. ____ C-1 ~~5~ ____ _

Date Jlj?J~--Applicant (print) OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

By ~ 0----'--------------r - -pryre-iaernr~--------

Signature

WAR Form (2/8/00)

Page 76: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o State of Hawaii FolOrftcial Use Only:

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Natural Resources

WELL ABANDONMENT REPORT 01-64

11-13-01

Instructions: Please print in ink or type and send completed report (with attachments, if applicable) to the Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission may not accept incomplete reports. This form shall be submitted within 60 days of the completion of work. For assistance, please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump In$taliation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further information and updates to this application form, visit http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm.

1. State Well No. 2301 -1 3 Well Name WP-4 (Well 13)

2. Location / Address Waikele Gulch Island Oahu TMK

3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. Name of driller who performed work

4. Type of Rig / Construction Pump Rig 1 Tremie Pipe Date of well sealing completion

Finished Grade Elevation 23.23 fl.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • Sand/Cement Ratio _1_,_1_

-. ~ Casing Diameter 12" in

P 3: I ~

9-4-02:8

Mel Lima

Nov. 2, 2001

M easured Depth of Blank Casing 60 (?) ft.

Total Measured Depth 445 ft.

I

I

-- Measured Depth of Perforated Casing None ft. -l Measured Depth of Open Hole 385 fl.

Remarks: 1 . Finished grade elevation Is the top of casing flange.

2. Total depth is from the top of casing flange. ------3'. 30 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

Well Abandonment Contractor (print) ___ ~el's _wat7~~~=-

Signature ~.? _~S: C-57 Lic. No. C-18254

Date ~Ljk~t---=== Applicant (print) 9~_~ CO~PA~'G._~I~IT~~ ____ _

Signature ~i ~~__ _ I ______ _

WAR Form (2/8/00)

Page 77: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o '<.t--or-,,~ State of Hawaii F Fo;'Offi~i~1 tJs~ Only:

.) COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT \ Department of Land and Natural Resources " 'J n, P 3: 1 5 ~ ~~" ~ WELL ABANDONMENT REPORT 11 _ ~ ~~':~ :: .J" --

Instructions: Please print in ink or type and send completed report (with attachments, if applicable) to tNf' '":-'" " l' t:', T: Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission ~ay not accept incomplete reports. This form shall be submitted within 60 days of the completion of work. !"or assistance, please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump Installation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further information and updates to this application form, visit http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm.

1. State Well No. ___ 2_30_1-~1~4~---: Well Name l _____ W_ P_-4....,.....:..(W_el_1 _14 ..... ) _________ _

2. Location / Address Waikele Gulch Island ___ Oah_u ___ TMK 9 -4- 0 2: 8

3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. Name of driller who performed work

4. Type of Rig / Construction Pump Rig / Tremie Pipe Date of well sealing completion

Finished Grade Elevation 20 . 71 ft.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • Sand/cement Ratio _1_,_1_

12" +- Casing Diameter in.

Mel Lima

Nov. 2, 2001

Measured Depth of Blank Casing __ 4_3_ft.

Total Measured Depth 458 ft.

~ ~ Measured Depth of Perforated Casing None ft.

Remarks: 1. -2.

f Measured Depth of Open Hole 4 15 ft.

Finished grade elevation Is the top of casing flange.

Total depth is from the top of casing flange. ------3'. 130 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

.

Well Abandonment Contractor (print) Mel's Water Works ~~~~c.

Signalur. ~y~ C-57 Lic. No. ___ ~~25~ _____ _

Dale -'~L_---Applicant (print) Q~!:f~ ~hJ~It't IT~!L ____ _

By( ~~ ~ Signature ---Ttc: Vi rf;> I-'rf;>c:i~rf~nT ---------

WAR Form (2/8/00)

/

Page 78: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o State of Hawaii For Official Use Only:

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Natural Resources

01-64 J\ ~:J",.' 3D p3: '5

WELL ABANDONMENT REPORT 11-13-01

Instructions: Please print in ink or type and send completed report (with attachments, if applicable) to the Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission may not accept incomplete reports. This fonn shall be submitted within 60 days of the completion of work. For assistance, please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump Installation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further infonnation and updates to this application form, visit http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwnn.

1. State Well No. 2301-15 Well Name WP-4 (Well 15) -------

2. Location 1 Address ___ W_a_ik_e_le_G_u_lc_h ____ Island ___ Oah_u ___ TMK

3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. Name of driller who performed work

4. Type of Rig 1 Construction Pump Rig 1 Tremie Pipe Date of well sealing completion

--. +- Casing Diameter 12" in

Finished Grade Elevation 20 . 21 ft.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • Sand/Cement Ratio _1_,_1_

9-4-02:8

Mel Lima

Nov. 2, 2001

M easured Depth of Blank Casing 83 (?) ft.

Total Measured Depth 461ft.

10-10- Measured Depth 10-

of Perforated Casing None ft.

Measured Depth of Open Hole 378 fl.

Remarks: 1 . Finished grade elevation is the top of casing flange.

2. Total depth is from the top of casing flange. ------3. 100 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

Well Abandonment Contractor (print) Mel's Water Works Hawaii, c.

IIIL) -----:-:--/~:?r-- -;;;z::--Signature ./#~-~-ZLi.-~~

C-57 Lic. No. ____ ~~82~~ ______ _

Oat9-1#1-__ _ Applicant (print) OAHU~IMITED

Signature ~2:~ Date -J4Mfte-'-----WAR Form (2/8/00)

./

Page 79: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o nr. ~,2

State of Hawaii For OfficilifUSe Only:

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Nat~ral Resources

WELL ABANDONMENT ~EPORT 01-64

11-13-01

Instructions: Please print In ink or type and send completed report (with attachments, if applicable) to the Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission may not accept incomplete reports. This fonn shall be submitted within 60 days of the completion of work. For assistance. please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump Installation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further infonnation and updates to this application fonn. visit http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwnn.

1. State Well No. 2301-16 Well Name WP-4 (Well 16)

2. Location 1 Address Waikele Gulch Island oahu TMK 3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. Name of driller who performed work

9-4-02:8

Mel Lima

, : r ~ •• ":

4. Type of Rig 1 Construction Pump Rig 1 Tremie Pipe Date of well sealing completion Nov. 2, 2001

-. .- Casing Diameter 12" in

Finished Grade Elevation 22 .28 ft.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • SandlCement Ratio _1_,_1_

Total Measured Depth 485ft.

i

~ ~ ~

M easured Depth of Blank Casing 1 03 (? }ft.

Measured Depth of Perforated Casing None ft.

~ Measured Depth of Open Hole 382 ft.

Remarks: 1 .

2. ------3.

Well Abandonment

Finished grade elevation is the top of casing flange.

Total depth is from the top of casing flange. 90 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

Contractor (print) Mel's Water wor~~.w7aii Inc.

Signalure ~-~ C-57 Lic. No. ____ ~~~2~~ ______ _

Dal. j r/i2P L ____ _ Applicant (print) OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

-~~----. .-----------

~~~ ~ -:--~- ----------- Date Jr/AGjo'-____ _ Signature

/

WAR Form (2/8/00)

Page 80: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o State of Hawaii

,......,. .,.- '-' . ..- .' l ~~ ... i l

ForUffleial Use Only:

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Natural Resources

01- 64 1 WELL ABANDONMENT REPORT 11-13-01

Instructions: Please print in ink or type and send completed report (with attachments, if applicable) to the C . Commission on Water Resource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809. The Commission mat-: not accept incomplete reports. This form shall be submitted within 60 days of the completion of work. For assistance, please consult the Hawaii Well Construction and Pump Installation Standards or call the Regulation Branch at 587-0225. For further information and updates to this application form, visit http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm.

1. State Well No. ___ 2_3_0_1_-1_7 __ Well Name WP-4 (Well 17)

2. Location I Address Waikele Gulch Island ___ Qah_u ___ TMK

3. Contractor Mel's Water Works Hawaii, Inc. Name of driller who performed work

4. Type of Rig I Construction Pump Rig 1 Tremie Pipe Date of well sealing completion

--. ~ Casing Diameter 12" in

Finished Grade Elevation 23 .28 ft.

Check Material Used

Grout Seal: 0 Cement • SandlCement Ratio _1_,_1_

p3: 15

,,' ; -:",

9-4-02:8

Mel Lima

Nov. 2, 2001

M easured Depth of Blank Casing 92 (?) ft.

Total Measured Depth 461ft.

-- Measured Depth of Perforated Casing None It. -Measured Depth of Open Hole 369 ft.

Remarks: 1 . Finished grade elevation is the top of casing flange.

2. Total depth is from the top of casing flange. ------3. 90 feet of 1/2- to 3/4-inch gravel was installed prior to backfilling with cement.

Well Abandonment Contractor (print) Mel's aler WOZ ' Inc.

------~-- ~-

Signature ____: _~_

C-57 Lic. No. ____ C-"'--~~5~ _____ _

DBie -a/ztP#L-----Applicant (print)

:~~~-~- - . - ---,.- ---------Signature

/ /

WAR Form (2/8/00)

Page 81: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO GOVERNOR OF HAWAII

Ref:2301-11 to 17Jet

Ms_ Tamara G. Edwards Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd. 700 Bishop St., Ste. 501 Honolulu, HI 96813

Dear Ms. Edwards:

o o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 621

HONOLULU. HAWAII 96809

September 12, 2001

GILBERT S. COLOMA-AGARAN CHAIRPERSON

BRUCE S. ANDERSON ROBERT G. GIRALD BRIAN C. NISHIDA

DAVID A. NOBRIGA HERBERT M. RICHARDS. JR.

LlNNEL T. NISHIOKA DEPUTY DIRECTOR

This is in response to your September 5, 2001 letter, requesting approval of your proposed sealing method for WP 4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17). Our records show that a Well Construction Permit to Abandon/Seal these wells was issued on February 3,2000.

Based on our review of your proposal and the well data provided, your request is hereby approved. Please do not forget to return a signed copy of the permit prior to the start of any work authorized by the permit.

LN:sd

If you have any questions, please contact Lenore Nakama at 587-0218.

Sincerely,

LINNEL T. NISHIOKA Deputy Director

/

-

Page 82: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

'-r o o

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED 700 Bishop Street, Suite 501

September 5, 2001

Ms. Linnel T. Nishioka Deputy Director

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone:, (808) 543-8520

Fax: (808) 543-8528

Commission on Water Resource Management Department of Land and Natural Resources State of Hawaii P. O. Box 621 Honolulu, HI 96809

c' '. I, . \\--

"\ ·_-t ,.

Re: Request for a Waiver in the Sealing of the WP-4 Wells (State Nos. 2301-11 to 17) in Waikele Gulch, Oahu, Hawaii

Dear Ms. Nishioka:

Pursuant to the permit to Abandon/Seal the seven WP-4 wells in Waikele Gulch approved by the Commission on Water Resource Management on January 31, 2000, we are about to undertake the work. Owing to the number and depth of these wells, we request that a waiver be granted in order to utilize gravel to fill the bottom sections of each well. The depth to the top of the gravel shall be 25 feet below the break in the salinity and/or temperature profiles through the water column of each well. Copies of these profiles are attached. A 5-foot sand plug would be installed on the gravel and then neet cement or sand-cement would be installed to the top of the casing flanges.

Proposed depths for the placement of gravel and cement grout are shown on the accompanying table. Your expeditious review of this waiver request would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact our consultant, Tom Nance, if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

OAHU SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED

Tamara G. Edwards Vice President

Attachments

--------------------------------------------------------------------------,-

Page 83: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o

proposed Sealing of the WP-4 Wells in Waikele Gulch

State Total Depth Below Distance Above Bottom Amount of Gravel Amount of Grout Well Casing Range to Sal./Temp. Break RII at Bottom RII to Casing Flange No. (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet)

2301-11 440 75 50 390

2301-12 478 135 110 368

2301-13 445 55 30 415

2301-14 458 155 130 328

2301-15 461 125 100 361

2301-16 485 115 90 395

2301-17 461 115 90 371

~: 1 . The amount 01 grout fill Includes a 5-100t sand plug separating the gravel and grout.

2. If cost effective, complete grout fill can be substituted for gravel and grout on any well.

------------------------------------------------------------------ -

Page 84: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

'\

o

o

WELL 2301-11 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 27. 1999

1.50 I I I I I I ' I ' : ~ , I I ' I '1 I : I ..... 76.0 : I iii! I I I:

l'40+---L--r++t--+-·L'-l---j.---,-._i_I---~-.Lt-+-r--·-II .. -·--"r·",···-1=75.5

l·30+·-·--~·--r~--+--+-+-·~-L·-l-·+----~-+-·+-l---I---+---,-+--I=ao I ! I Iii I I l Iii I l I I I

1.20+ ........... \""' .......... 11 ... · ........ · .. ,·· ....... · .. ·r-····_ .. ·,,; ............ r·· ...... ·-r-.. · ... T-.... -t

l· ... -.......... · .... ·_ .. r-....... ··J.I·· ... ··· ... ·l .... ·· .. ·_j_·· .. ·· .. ·il·· .......... ·I .... ·· ..... ·1 ............. ···· ......... J.

1

' .. ·-.. ·· .. "

• I • I I I 1 I: I 1 1 O+ .. · ...... ·~ ...... -.. -t .... · ... · .. ·+ .. ·-....... ·I .. · ...... -·I·-· .. · .... ·l· ............ + ...... · .. · .. ·j. ...... -4 .......... ·- ............. . ... - ... -t ........ · ... ·~ ............ ·! ............... · ........... I ............ ·+ ....................... -+ ........ - .. • • I I I I • I I I i I I I

Iii I Ii! ! . : I I i I I , I . I I I • • • I ,I I . . 1.00 .. · .... ·····i· .. -····-··T .. ·-·· .. ··~ .. ·-..... +· .. ·· .... -.. ,-· .. ·-.... ·~ ........... + ............. 1-.... _-1._ ..... _ ............... · .... · .. · .... r· .. · ... ···~· .. ···-···-t·--· .. ·+·-........ ·l· ..... · ...... +· ... ·-· .. l .... --.-·~ ....... ··

[ 0.90 --J---,---I·--f-_·-'-·--+--i--L --l! --I---·'---+.---~-j---t.--t---.. I .. ---L--i-.-.-~ 0.80 ......................... ·t ............ I ...... · .. · .. 11... ........... ·:· .......... ,· .... · ...... ·t .. · ................................................ · .... ·· ...... \·--1------1----:-···-----·-+--·-~ 0.70 ...... · .... ·l· .... · .... ·r .......... T ........... I-.......... ·I .... · .. · .... ·r .. ·-.. · .. ·l ............................ 1' ....... - ............ · .. ·1· ........... · ...... · .. · .. 1 .. · ...... ·· ............... j" ................................ -......... -....... ~ ............ .

.. · ... · .... ··: .. · .. ·· .. · .. ·1·· .. ··-· .. } ... ··· ... · .. ·, .. · .. ·_ .. ·'I' .. m· .. • ... I· ···· .... · .. j··· ........ .,. .. · ... ·· .... l ..... · .... · .. r .. · .. ·· .... ··!· ..... • ... · .. r···· .. · .. ··j· .. · .... ··· .. t· ........ ·J ._ .. ·.. j ............ -r· ... · .... · .. r ..... ··--t ......... ·· ..

O.5CH----l--~-- --.~-I..---.L--l-·~-!--+.-'.-...j---t-_.LJ- -:-[I---+-.t-l .. _ ........ . I I: I I 1 I j . I i I I I

0.404-· ...... ···~· ...... ·-.. i ....... ·-'··· ......... · ._ ..... _ ......... · .. ·· .. ·j-·····-· .. 1 .. · .. · .. · .. ··r· .. -· .. l·-· .... -r-· .... -I· .. - .. ··· .. :·· .... ··_· .... ·· .... · .... t .... · .... ·l···_·-I· ... ··_···t .... · .. · .......... _ .... 1. ........... .

O.3o-t-·-+-+-·-,----·-i-·-~--·_L--+--_-t--·· "'--'--'I--r--1·-1------.. -L .. -o 204 ............. 1 ...... · .. • .. .1 ............ l.. .... · ........ · ....... · .. ·I .. · .......... I... ......... .l. ....... -.L-......... L .. - ..... ~ ... _ ...... -! ............. ~ ......... _i ...... _ ..... t ........ -.~ ............ .1. ........... ..1 ............. l... .... _..1_ ......... ..

. : Ii· I I ! I I I I I I I I ' I I I • I I I I . I I I I '1'1 I I I I I .! I I I' • I I I! I Iii I'! I i I I

~ ~ ~ 100 1~ 150 1~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m DEPTH INTO WATER (FEEn

[- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE I Exhibit 3

CL Cl w e.

Page 85: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

, ,

l

0

~ Q.

e:. ~ Z ::J ~

WELL 2301-12 IN THEWP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

1·50'....,--~---:---,--..,..--r----.--;--:--'---;--;--:--.----;----:--;----r--:-:--:----c7e.o

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.30

0.20

O. 1 O-h-.......... +.......-r-ri-"T"T"T-r+-.rTT"'1,-M,'"1"'"ri-rrrrl-,..".r+-r-T"T"T-n-..~TT"I-rhM"T"'1rh-,..,.,...h-r-TT'i-'T"T"T..-+r"rT-r+....,.......,-t-rT"r....-hrT'"T"1r-h-r-r-r~....-.+ o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 000 325 350 375 400 425 450 475

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE I Exhibit 4

[L'

ci w 0 -

Page 86: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

o

WELL 2301-13 IN THEwp·4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 25, 1998

1.~~--~~~~---r--~--'-~--~--'---'--'---'--'---'-~'--.---r __ .-__ .-~

1.40

::: -··f·-+-·+··-r----·t·--t-- --.. ---I--+··+-+-+-·+·-I--j-·-t··-··j·_-1.1

0 ·············I············t'··· .. ·· .. T1

···········'I··········· .. r .. ·· .. ·····!""····· .... ··{I .... ········"tI .... · .. · .. ·t·· .. · .. ·· .. lj·_····_···I .... ··· .. _·1 .. · ........ ··r·· .. · .. · .. t· .... ··: .. r···· .. · .. t-· .... ···· .. l·· .. ··· .. ··j······· .. · .. t-·· ........ . 1.00--l-!"·-T-rTl~---··-·-·--···+--r-·-l-t-·l-T·-·r--l·-.. .

[ 0.90 ·-r·-r--·+··-t···-i·--·Y-+·-· -1'--' -T-·+-·r--·--·t·j""--T·-I-·1-·-~ 0.00 ·-··r--l-+·-t-+_·--+-:-· -l-t-----i·--·t-+·-r-····r··-·!-·-I··-·.,.·-·-~ o. 70 ···· .. ·· .... ·\· .. ·· .... · .. i· .. ··· .. · .. ·t·· .... ··· .... I···_ .... ····I· ............ r .. · ...... -t .. _ ...... · ............ .. ... _ ..... 1"-.......... · .. · .. · .. · .. ·! .. · .. ··· .. ···t-· .. ······ .. ·t···· .. · .... t .. ····;··· .. I .. ···_··· .. 1 ...... · ...... j····· .. ·· .. ··t·· .. ·· .... · .. m . I I. I • I

0.60 · .. _ ...... r .. _ .... r· .... ·· .. j· .... · .. ····r· .. · .. ··l··· .. · .. ·l .... · .. · .. r .. · ...... ·J• .. • .. ·_ .. ,·· .. • ...... ,··_ ...... ·T ...... · .. ·r .... ·· .... t .. · .... · .. ·r .... · .... ·j· .. ··· .. ·· .. Y· .. · 1"""'" .. ·, .... ··· ...... 1·· .. ····· .. ·· 0.50 '. ··_1._······1·-·····,-·····+·····-1-··_···, .. _.-.,_ ... _ .. _._ ..•.•.. - . __ .- .---.. ~.:-.. . ..... _.1._._' .. _. ·r"-;--"i.--t._.-0.40 ··r··t--r- I .. .L._ -' .. -. -:---l.-f-·-I-·-···+·t··-I····r·T·-· 0.30--+ ....... 1 .... -... l··-f-·T····--·L-_~ .. _- ._--'.'-_ ..... "-"',"+-1--.. ······j·-·r···+--

I I. I I i I I ! I I Iii ! ! I ! ! 0.20 ···· .... ····T····· .. ·····r .... ···· .. l· .... ··· .. ··T···· .. ·· .. ·T .. · ...................... (' ..... _ ... _, ... _ ... _ .... ··_·· .. · ........ · .. -I-.. ··· .. ··\ .......... · .. • .. · .... · .. ·T··_ .. · .. T· .... ···· .. r .. · .. ······r····· .. ····I·············r············ 0.104T~~TH~n+~rhTn~~hT~Tn~nTrlTnT~~~~nTMonn+n~~n+nTrhTn~~~~

o 2550 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 .250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 5

LL

ffi o -

Page 87: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~

~

e

o

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

~ no 0.90 no -~ 0.80 Z ::J 0:( 0.70 fD

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-14 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

I I Iii I '1 I il I II I iii I 'I Ii! L76.0 I • I : I : I I Ii': : L I ·--· ..... ·r .. _ .... ·r-··· ... · .. ·_·· ....... r··_ .... ·r .. ·_ .. -r-.. ····-T-······-r· .. ··_ .. r·· ..... · ... r-·· .. ·-T--·-··r-.... -- I-· .. ·_··r .. · .... ·l-.... -.. r· ... · .... ·l··_··· ... · .. : '''-'''-1'''''-''''''

......................................... 1 ................. - ....... 1._ ...... -1. ....... _ ... 1 ....... _ ....... _ ... _+ ..... ···_-.· ... ···· ... ···I-···· ... · .. ·.·-· .... ····t···· .. _ .... .1. ....... -....... --.. -1 .. -... -... :, ......... -.. 1.. ........... -1 ........... .. j ! t ! I ! I : ! ! I i I I i I: · .. '1: 1 i .' I I " I, I ! I I I I : I I . I I I ! I! I: I : i I .: ! i I I I ! ! ... -.-... -1 ............. 1 ..............

1: ···· .. ····-·I .... ·· .. _ .. ·/"'····_····-r··· .. _··· .. t ...... _ .. ·T-.. ·_· ... f· .. ·· .... · .. t· .. ·· ..... ··i· .. ·-······j"·· .. _· .. ·i·····_··· .. + .............. ,: .. ·_··-·I-_···_· .. ··r .. _· .. ·;··_···_ .. ··t· .......... ··

• I I I . I I . I , I I .. I 1 ! I i I· Iii i , i . J I I I ·· .. · ........ I ........ · .... t .. · .. · .. · .. t ............ I ...... ······ .. ,··· .. ·· .. · .. ·1· .. · .... · .... r-... · .... -r·-...... t .... · .... · .. \· .......... · .. , .. ·_ ........ \· .. · .. · ...... t .... _ .. · ... ·t .. · .. ·_ .. ·r·_ .. ·-l· .... · ...... , .... · ........ I ...... ·_ .. ·l .. · ...... · ..

.. · .... _· .. T· .......... T-.. · .. _ .. -l--.. · .. · .... r .... · ...... ·I· ........ · .. ·I··· .. ·· ...... !· .......... -r .. -...... l ........ ···- .............. ·· .......... ·r ...... · .... ·i· ...... · ... ··~· ........ ·i .... · .. · ....................... _ ... -.j._ .... _ ... _ ....... _ .. ..

-·-+--t----··-r---+-+--~----t-·-+---·--~--+-·+-+-t----·---. I ·--t------j--·-"j""--L-i---j-·-r-+-t·-j-i--"t·---1-1-1-·--]I-.+---j __ 1·_-1_· __ -·--·1-T--~-i--r--r--+-r--i-·-t---r·--r·-··r---l---;-+·-1-·-,·--1-·-~""""'-II""""""'li""'-"'T="""II""· ..... ···r-·····_··l· ... ·_· ... j·_ .. · ... · .. ·r··· .. ·_·T ..... ···· .. ·!··_·····_···CR···········j············V· I I I 1·

=-......... ··--·~i--···-~+-~---;-t--+-·-,---I-t·_,-e--t-T-t·---t-·i--i--,·-·_,·_-j·----··-···-l· .. ········t-···-···-t-··-········~I··-·-······,·······-···1-····-·-1"""·····-: i j .. -.•... _ .. ··_····_···,··_-···_··I .. _· ...... ·t ... ·· .. _ .. t···· ...... ·t-· .. ·-+···-.. · .. -ll···-.. ···~.ll··-···-····+ .. -···-····

, " I I I . ., I I " ,

--t·-t-+-l··--t-·-+-+--f·--+--f·-+---t--·-t---;--~-·-;.---.. -.1- - ---t-o ..... -...... L .......... .l. ........... L ........... ~ .......... _.j .... ···· .. ···1 .. ···· .. · .. ..1········ .. ·_1 ............ 1. .......... _1 ..... · ...... .J ... _ ..... ..l. ............ t' ........ ..! I I 1 I , I I I ! I ! ! I iii I !.. T,·· .. ··_ .. ·T· .. ·········I .. _· .... ··· .. , .. ········ .. T .. ··· ...... ·r· .......... .

• , • , • • • • " I I" : I ! . I ~ 010 I . . . . I' I . : . I Iii ., . I I . . I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I II II I II I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I Iii Iii i I I I I I I o nJ: ~'" ..,p .. _- ~-.- .... _- ... - --- --2 ... 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 415

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

[- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 6

(L

Sl c -

Page 88: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

e

J=" a.. a.. .......

i:: Z :::J « fJJ

G-

WELL 2301-15 IN TH E WP-4 WELL SA TIERY MARCH 27,1998

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

I~ .. -_.-... -••• T.l-.. ---.... ·l-... -... -... -... _'L-... -.--... '.l-... -_.-... -.. :r, ... -.... -.. -._T.l.-_.-... -... _'l-... -... -.... -_'t.-._.-._-_.:.1.-... -_.-... :.~' ... -... -_.-.. _Tl-._-.. -... 'J-... _-_-... -_._'! .. -_.-.... -_.I.l-... -.... -_: .. lr ... -.. _-.-.... TI_-.. _-._-.' .. ~-... -... -.. _-.'/..-_._--.. _I!-... _-.. -._-.. C::::

·-·-+·-·+·-+---i·--'--·+,,+-+-t--·I-~·-·-!-+-·-~t--L-+---.-+--"""+--"i-t"-,,t---r---i'·-t--l-T--r-+"I-·+-t--i-+++·-r-·

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

........ -.-L ..... -.. .l .......... ..1.--.. -... I ...... - .... L ........... L. ........ ..l .... "-"'+"''''-'''r' ...... -.... I .. - ......... I-..... -.... L .... - .. ...l. ............. L.._._ .. ...f .. _ ... - .. I-.. -... -I .. --.-.. l ... --.-.! ...... -.... . ! ! i i 'I ! I I I Ii! ! I 1 Ii' I I ! i I I I iii I I i I ! iii I .. · .. · .... -t"--"l-·"·-·r .... -· .. t· ...... · .... t"-"·"r"-·-·r .. _ .. · .. t .... ·--T .... -· .. r .. ·-l .. ---· .. t .... · ...... l .. -.... -r-· .... l·--·-·+· ........ -r .. "'''+'''''''-'r'-''''''

·· .. · .... · .. ·'· ............ + .. · ...... · .. I .......... ···~ .......... -·'· ...... ·· .. ·· .. ··-.... · ...... ·-.... ·-r .. ·-...... ·f .. ···-··· .. ·l ...... -.. ·-I ..... - ..... !""1'-"'1"--+"-- .--L""I··-··1 .. ·-· .... .. -+""-I,,--I--+-·-I,,--i·-j-"t-"+"--r--·~--"I--r-~r-+-·-"""" '-"1'--'''''-

... ·-.... -I ........ --t-.. ·-.... l·-· .. · .... l, ...... --.. ·, .... · .. · .... ·,,·-...... - .. ·/·-· ...... ·-1· ........ -'1'· .. ·· .... ·-1 ...... · ...... -\-.. ·-· ...... 1 .. -· ........ 1 .. -.... - .. t .... · .. -.... t ........ · .. -· .. · .......... ·j· ............ , .... - .. -· .. t .... _ .... · • t. i .. t I

--I. --~--.+-i-j-+-+-J--.i-.-L,+-+-+,-,--+--L--t-+-­.. ··-··· .. ··I---j--t--,,'- : -,,'.--:----~--L,,-L-+-I--t-·-!-,,++_t--+--4I···-···-···

1 ii' !. I ! I I I : i .' II! i ! i ··········-II·--··-·t-···-·····+I···-·······!,··_· .. ··-·1· .. ·· .. ··-··1········· .. ··1·--····· ....

1! • .. ·-· .. ··1 .. ··-······-r··· .. -·· .. ~ .. ···-···1· ........ ···...! .. --······-t .. -.. ······r-··· .. ···J"·····-···· ;", '. • .... 1··-.. ·-··

Ii! ! i I I . . Ii! ! Ii, ! ; I

.... - .. --..... - .... -..... - .. · .... -·-·J'· ...... ·-.. r............ ........... ............ ._ .. . . I

···········-!····· ........ t-····-·····t····-··· .. ··I··· .. ···· ..... j.-.......... j .... -.... -t-.......... , .......... + ......... ···I······-···t-·· .. ·-·· .. I .. ····-.... j-···· .. ·· .... r .. ··· .. ·1f .. -.... ·-.. I·-...... -·+ .. · .. -.... ·I .... · .. -.. t .. ·-.... -i i ! t ; ! iii I ! I 1 I .: i

0.10~~~~n4TTrrhn~+rrroh~~TrMrlTT~~~+rTrrlh~~~n4TTrrhn~~rn~~~nn~TT~~~~~~ o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SAUNITY - TEMPERATURE J Exhibit 7

Page 89: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

o

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

f 0.90 D.. ...... i= 0.80 Z ~ 0.70 UJ

O.

0.50

0.40

0.30

WELL 2301-16 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

.-.-+-----t.--L.-I----~--.-t_-~-. ...!.--+.--~-.i---f---_I--i--+. ___ --J--r--~-"-c76.0 I ! I I I I ; I I ! I ! ! I I !, I I I ! I I .! ! I! I I I! I

--1---T-l--t--l--·t--l-i-l-r-·-'~I·-r--t---r-I-I--r1---······· .. ····l·········-·~ ...... ·····+···· ........ I·· ........ ····i····· .. ······J···· .. ·······t···· ... ···· .. t··· ..... -t···_·· .. ·1 .. · .. ····· .. ..I .. ·_···· .. ·!· .... ··_···l-.. · .. · .. ·t-........ ···1'·· ...... _·\······_·····I.. .... ·······•· .......... ··t .. · .. ····· .. ·

........... ..I. ....... _..L_ ....... L ....... ..I. ........... ..I. ........ ,J .. _· ... ..l. .... : ....... l ........... .L-..... ..l. .......... ...I ............ .L ....... ...1 ...... -.. .1.. ...... ...1 ............. 1-.. ......... 1._ .. _ .. .1 ........... t ......... . I iii iii I I ' I I ! I I! I!

·············j· .. ··· .. · .. ·+··········t···········+·_···· .. ·,···· .. · .. · .. ·[··· .... ··-f-·· .... ···t·_···· .... l-····· .. ·I·· .. ···· .... ·l"····:·· .. ·-I-:····· .. ··+·········+ .. ···~ .. +-···-··I .. ··· ... ··· .. r·········+····· .. _+ .. ·_····· i ! I ! I ! Iii I 1 i , I J' I ! ! I ··· .. ··· .. ···!······_ .. ··1!······_· .. ·, .. ···• .... ··t··· ... ·····."I' ............ II···_· .. •• .. t,····· .. · .... ·1 .. _····_·+········ .... · .. _ .... - .. ·_···· .... I-···· .. ·· .. t·_······ .. ·t .. ···· .. · .. ,······· ...... ' .. ··· ...... _!·· .... · .... ··I···· .. -4--····· . I' I I I , I I ! I' I i! I' I ! ! I I .,; I ! I I

· .... ··_· .. , .. ····_····t-···········t-············r········· ... , ............. ···· .. ·· .. · .. t-· .. ···· .. -t··· .. ···_·l"· .. ··· .. ··+ .. _···· .... I·· .... ··· .. ·t--·· .. ·· .. l···········l···· .. ···t··_······I·· .. ········t········ .. ··I.. . ....... + ........... . ·············II· .. · .. ·······t············· · .. · .. ·······t············I, ---f·-.··.· ..... t ---I--t--f--·-j--·-r-- !·· .. ····· .. ··t·········· .. t·· .. ········+············ ............. , .... - ... ~ ............ .

• I _. ~__ i I !. 2 •

. ............ !.~ :::····-r-· .... · .. ··r ...... · .. ··l· .... ·~·;;;t· .. ·· ..... ·l··· .. ··· .... T.···~ .... ·T· .. -·· .. ·i"· .. ·-····..;··· ........ ··'·· • .. • .. • ....... ···_·t-··· .. · .. ·j .... ···_·· ... _ ........... _ ............ _ ................. .

----:--+--I---r--- t·--f--·I--·---1·············I,-1+--1--·-!---+--J----.--l---~--· I ,. i, 1 I I I I I I I I I _ .. · .. ··-r .. ·· .. ····t··· .. · .. ··i··· ... · .. ·l··· .. ······ ................................ ........... . ............ ······ .. · .... T-·· .. · .. ··j ...... · .. ···· ······ .. ·····+ .. ·_······t .. _···_· ............. ~ ............ + ............ + .. - ....... .

0.20

...... _ ... 1. .. _ ....... 1. ........... 1 ............ · ... _ ........ ,1 ............. ,1 .. _ ....... L ..... _ .. 1 ........ _.1.._ ....... I ... _ ..... 'I I. I I I I i i ' I Ii· -..... ··--1 ......... _. · .. ···_ .. ··r· .. ········ ...... .... t .. · ........ ..

............. ~ .......... J ............ L .... -.......... · .. ·····I .. · .. ·· .. ·· .. I·· .. ·· .... ···J,······ .... ··r'··· .. · .... · 1 ............. 1............ I I I I j ,I

010 i I I. I i I! 1! r---I---'- ,--r-'-r--r--I--'r'l-'--. ill I iJJ I I dJ II U-, I I! 11 I I !lll I dJ I I! III I I II 1I1I1 II 1I1I1 I II III 11 I 1 I II I I I III II II , I I I, I I Ii, , , , I, , , • I •• I I ~ 20 50 75 100 125 150175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEEn

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE I Exhibit 8

[L

f3 e.

Page 90: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

l

WELL 2301-17 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

1.50 ! I I I I I i I I I I I iii I I I . 76.0

1 40 ---l·---+--+--·~---t·-·1'"---j--I--·-~·--l--"··-·-l---·'l-··········1··_····_·· .. ··· .. ··-·' .. ···-·····~l-········· 1:30 .-L-.+--+-l--+-.--I---.-L·--rt-·~·-~--+--~'-+--'I----j- ----,---~ 1.20 ..... _ ..... L········t .. ·········.L·· .... · ........ · .. ·· .. ·+ .......... ·j. .. · .. · ...... { .......... J .. · .... · .. ·j .... · .. · .... ·I .. · .. : .. · ... ~ ............. · ............ j· ...... · .. · .. t ........ · .. ·1 ........ · .. I·· .... · .. • .. •• .......... ·~ ............ ·l ...... · .... .. 1.1c--+·c-l--+-·-~t-·--'---i---r-+--,---'-·-+-l--t-·+t--- ··-t~+-i--1.00 -·-rT--·---I·---,--r-",-·t+---I--l-r-f--,-· -'-1-t'---r--~ C.SO ---·-t-·,t .. _ .... _·_ ...... ·f .. _ .. · .... '· .. · .. · ....... - .... - .. t ........ ~ ................ _ ....... , .. - .......... _· .. _·+ .. · .. ·_ .. .l .. ·: .... · .. ·t .. _ .. · .. · -.... _ .. ·1 .......... ·!· ... _ .. - ...... -.... -

~ 0.80 .......... · .. 1 ...... · .. · .. · ................................................... \ ................... · .. ·-1 ...................................... j. ................ · .. · .... ·j .... _ ...... I ........ · .. ·t ............. , ... _ .... _ .. _ ............ _ .. _ ............... .. - " I!, I I !

~ 0.70 '-i-- --t---·--i---L--;--+-I-·-------:I--·f-·-+-·+---l-+-'--'-- --- "12-0.

I-SAliNITY - TEMPERATURE I

Exhibit 9

Page 91: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

MEMORANDUMFORTHERECOR

FROM: SUBJECT:

Lenore Nakama Sealing Method

o

Spoke with Glenn Bauer re: reasonabl sealing method for WP 4 wells. Glenn said that the break in the salinity curve should b identified (Nance has CTD readings). It would be reasonable to fill with gravel to abo t 25' below the break in curve, top with sand, and fill w/neat cement to the ground surfac .

Told Tom Nance that the sealing perm't requires adherence to HWCPIS. Ifhe wants to propose an alternate method, such as t at described above, Jim Wriston should write a letter to us proposing a variance to the WCPIS.

Page 92: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

+ BENJAMIN J CAYETANO <JOIt"EJIIIIOI~HNN"

REF:CWRM-SS

Mr. Jim Wriston

o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF lAND AND NATURAl RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 621

HONOlUlU, HAWAI 96809

fEB - 3 2OCO

Oahu Sugar Company, ltd. c/o Amfac land Company, ltd. 700 Bishop St., Ste. 501 Honolulu, Hawaii 96804

Dear Mr. Wriston:

Well Construction Permit to AbandonlSeal WP4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17)

TIMOn« E. JOHNS --BRUCE S. AHOERSON

ROBERT G. GIRAl.D BRIAN C. NISHIDA DAVID A NOBRIGA

HERBERT M. RICHARDS, JR

LINNEl T. NISHIOKA aEPU1Y eMEtTOR

Enclosed are two (2) copies of your approved Well Construction Permit for the captioned well(s) which authorizes well abandonment/sealing activities. As part of the Chairperson's approval, the following special conditions were added and are part of your permit under Permit Condition 7:

Special Conditions

1. (NONE)

To validate your permit, please sign and have the contractor sign both permit originals and return one for our files.

IMPORTANT - The well owner Is responsible for all conditions of the permit This includes ensuring that the your licensed contractor. submits a completed Well Abandonment Report form (enclosed) within sixty (60) days after the well construction work is completed. Be advised that you may be subject to fines of up to $1000 per day for any violations of your permit conditions.

If you have any questions, please call the Commission staff at 587-0218.

Enclosures

Aloha,

. U,~· IMO HY E. JOHNS r

Chairperson

/

--------------------------------'.< -

Page 93: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

WELL CONSTRUCTI N PERMIT TO ABANDON/SEAL WP 4 Wells Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17

In accordance with Department of Land and Natural R rces, Commission on Water Resource Managemenfs Administrative Rules, Section 13-168, entitled 'Water se, Wells, and Stream Diversion Works·, this document permits the abandonment/sealing ofWP 4 Wells (Well Nos. 2301-1 to 17 at Walkele, Oahu, TMK 9-4-02-08, subject to the Hawaii Wei Construction & Pump Installation Standards (112319D ich include but are not limited to the foUowing conditions:

1. The Chairperson of the Commission on Water esource Management, P.O. Box 621, Honolulu, Hawaii 96809, shall be notified in writing before any work covered b this permit commences.

2. The permit may be revoked by the Commission' work is not started within six (6) months after the date of approval or if work is suspended or abandoned for six (6) m ths, unless otherwise specified.

3. The owner or operator of any well which has determined by the department or voluntarily declared by the owner or operator to be abandoned as defined in § 13- 68-2, after written notification, shall be required, at owner's or operator's expense, to re-case, cement, plug , cap, or otherwise repair the well or fill and seal the well with cement in a manner approved by the commission.

4. The well construction permit application is inco rated into this permit by reference and is subject to the Hawaii WeD Construction & Pump Installation Standards (J uary 23,1997; HWCPIS). If the HWCPIS are not followed and as a consequence water is wasted or contaminated, lien on the property may result.

5. The Well Abandonment Report form (attached) all be submitted to the Commission on Water Resource Management within sixty (60) days after completion of the

6. The permittee shall comply with all applicable , rules, and ordinances.

7. Special conditions in the attached cover trans I letter are incorporated herein by reference.

Date of Approval: January 31, 2000 / Expiration Date: When well Is sealed In a manner

acceptable to the Commission

I have read the conditions and terms of this permit and nderstand them. I accept and agree to meet these conditions as a prerequisite and undel1ying condition of my ability to . I also understand that non-compliance with any permit condition may be grounds for revocation and fines of up to $1 per day.

Permittee's Signature: __________ -+-_______ _ Date: ______ _

Printed Name: Firm or Trtle: _______ _

Contractor's Signature: _________ -+ ______ License#: _____ Oate, ___ _

Printed Name: Firm or Title: _______ _

Please sign both copies of this permit, return one the Chairperson, and retain the other for your records.

Attachment c: USGS

Department of Health! Safe Drinking ater, Wastewater, and Clean Water Branches Honolulu Board of Water Supply

I

I

/

Page 94: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

, 0 0 OEPAAn-£NT OF l.M D NO ~TtM. RESOlRCES

/Y)("t"1ENT N) • UACOR

F YR N>P

QQ QQQ

- -- ---- -- _ ... -- -- ---

RfMAAKS:

SRCI COST OOBJ CTR PRruECl PH ACT

Q. (1) ----- -- ---(2) - ---- --- ----- -- ---

- --- ---- ---- -- --- (3)

- ---- ---- ------ (It) -- --TOTAL

LINE (1) Wpll Nn ?~111 .11 t"n 1"

LINE (2)

LINE (3)

LINE (It)

. A. JAMES WRISTON, III 576-5().8441 POBOX 2388 595-4909 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96804

/4" ACt£O w:>RKS I-£ET . MTE: 2/1/00

Lt.o..NT NlIME/DESCR1PTlON"_Q{ANi I~)

• 5.00 A • James Wriston III ------------------------------ ..... -------~ ....... .-.,------------------------..---------.------------------

25.00

.. -- -~----- ...

-

~~

Page 95: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

+ o .- -"'I

Rr-0C"!\,' t· ~_ t.,!' '.. J

Amfac Land Company, Limited l' 4 :D 0 700 Bishop Street, Suite 501 • Honolulu, Hawaii 9681aGJJ\i\ \ 8

January 14, 2000

Dept. of Land and Natural Resources Commission on Water Resource Management P.O. Box 621 Hon. Hi. 96809 attn.: Ms. Lenore Nakama

Re: Closure of Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17, TMK 9-4-02-08, Waikele, Oahu

Dear Lenore:

Please find enclosed the well closure application, maps and $25.00 application fee for the above mentioned well closure.

It is our intent to request proposals from qualified contractors to effectuate the closure of the wells. Once we have selected a contractor, we will contact your office to discuss the closure plan. Thank you for your patience on this matter. If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 543-8510.

Very truly yours,

OMPANY, LIMITED Sugar Company, Limited

A. J es Wriston III ger of Land Administration

cc: Tamara Edwards Lorraine Egusa

Telephone: 808-543-8520· Facsimile: 808-543-8528

---------------------------------,',-

Page 96: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o State of Ha~ii

o COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Department of Land and Natural Resources

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT D Well Construction or 0 Pump Installation

Instructions: Please print in ink or type and send completed ~pplication with attachments to the Commission on Water Resource Manage nt. P.O. Box 621. Honolulu. Hawaii 96809. Application must be a~mpanied by a non-refundable filing fee of 525.00 payable to the Dept of and and Natural Resources. The Commission may not accept in mplete applications. For assistance. call the Regulation Branch at 587"'() 25.

1. APPLICANT: (circle primary contact a,® or Primary Fax: 5H3-q5~$ (b) LANDOW,NER

2.

3.

5.

(a) WELL OWNER

~~~~:TRAC~~~lok~ (~~lJy bj} ph' Contrado(s C-57 License N,"'-__________ -+_ ContadPeBon __ ~ ______________________________ __ Add~ss ______________________________________ ___

WELL LOCATIJN/~~Mf: Address \ ~ ~ (.

j

Island ........ ~=-:;:...;;:.. __ -+_ Tax Map KeY...;;&--l"""':::;';;;"_-fo_

Attach the relevant portion of (a) a 7.S-Minute Series USGS topographic map (scale 1"=24.000'), and (b) a property tax map, sh 'ng

well location referenced to established property boundaries.

(a) PROPOSED WORK: 0 Drill New Well 0 Deepen D Install New Pump

o Modify Existing Wen 0 RedriH 0 Modify Pump

(i(Abandon/seal· 0 Replace Pump

• Be .u~ to complete and submit well abandonment ~port upon ~n of @. o

(b) WELL TYPE: 0 Dug 0 Bo~d 0 Driven 0 Drilled 0 Radial S?::; ~ Is this well a part of a battery of wells? ~es 0 No ~~ ~,...;.; Z ,"'" -(Briefly describe and fill in the diagram on the back 0 this form.) iT: ,::5 ~

~): ~~ -~

PP.OPOSED PUMP INFORMATION: Rated Pump Capacity: galto~ per fTliBute

Pump Type:

D Deep Well Turbine o Rotary o Propeller

D SubmeBible 0 Rotary-Displacement 0 Reciprocating

D Centrifugal 0 Rotary-Gear 0 Impulse

If Pump Replacement, Existing Pump Capacity: _____ _

PROPOSED USE: D Municipal (including hotels. sto~s. etc.)

D Domestic (individual, nOnCOm"¥rcial water sys.)

o Irrigation (crop) "'_A-o Military

~O;~sel .~~ ~ .t-

OGas ~~i~n ~ D Electric, rated hOBepower: --------f-­gallons per minute

D Industrial

# Dwelling Units ___ __

#~s ___ __

o Other: __________ _

6. (a) PROPOSED AMOUNT OF WITHDRAWAL: _____ _ gallons per day

(b) METHOD OF FLOW MEASUREMENT: D FIow-meter o Open-pipe 0 Orifice Plate Weir

7. PENDING ACTIONS: DCDUA o SMA DEIS DEA o NONE o Other(explain)

Completion Date:

8. REMARKS,EXPLANATIONS: ________ ~--------------------------------~---

mort'! "palle I!\ ne

I undeBtand that approval of this application attaches the following standard conditions: 1) the proposed work is to be completed within two (2) years of the approval date; 2) the contractor shall submit to the Commission a weH completion/abandonment report within 30 days after the completion date of e permitted work; 3) monthly water use data shall be submitted to the Commission; 4) such approval shall not constitute a determination of co~lalive water rig ts and shall

::;::?£S+~Z=e~OTI~ Cu~W Conrractor __ ~N~ ..... __ -+ __ _

Signature ~~4 Sig~ture ;2}: Signature -------r-.-Date Date ~ Date _______ --+ __ _

For Official Use Only: Date Received _____ _ Date Accepted ~ _____ _ Field Checked By _______ _

l ... ~_·'-...;;.,_.::_-----~

Aquifer System Nanee _________ +-___ _ ~

DatI! ________________ _ Latitude ___________ _ State Well No. _____________ +-___ _

1011 7 WCPI Form

Page 97: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o 8. Remarks, Explanations (cont'd): _________________________ , ____ _

9. PROPOSED WELL SECTION

Elevation at top of casing __ ft.,msl. (surveyed to nearest 0.01 ft)

Cement Grout: ft. (70% dl'ltilnce :surface to water)

Rock Packing ____ ft.

Hole Diameter: in. (allow 3" ann",lnr space)

Total Depth ft. (~10 x head)

1

Ground Elevation: ___ ft., msr

.' "

Solid Casing: (see well standards) MateMI ___________________________ _

Length ______________ ft.

(90% distance surface to water) Diameter':-_______________________ in.

Wall th~,&$$ in.

Casing: o Perforated o Screen (see well standards)

MateMI Length ft. Diameter in. Wan thickness in. Openings sq. inA.F.

Open Hole: length ___________________________ ft.

Diameter in.

"Approximate elevatior, at tim .. of filing spplicati~n. Gr!'und ~levl'lt~!'I ab"ve mean sea level (msl) by a surveyor licensed by the State must be submitted at start of construction. Final elevations of well components shall be submitted in the well completioniwell abandonment reports.

; . .

Page 98: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

6SI-~ ZO/ZO"d 5Z9-1 L5H-BSS-BOB+ 3HMN1:no~~ 01:60 00, ~l NVr

Page 99: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO GOVERNOR OF HAW""

o o

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES

COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Mr. A. James Wriston ill Amfac Land Company, Ltd. 700 Bishop Street, Suite 501 Honolulu, HI 96813

Dear Mr. Wriston:

P. O. BOX 621 HONOLULU. HAWAII 96809

JUN I 7 1998

Proposal for Disposition of Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17 and 2301-21 to 32

TMK 9-4-2:8. Waikele. Oahu

MICHAel D. WILSON

ROBERT G. IRALD DAVID A. BRIGA LAWRENCE . MilKE

RICHARD . COX HERBERT M. RI HAROS. JR.

Thank you for your letter of May 8, 1998, outlining your proposal for the disposition of the subject wells.

We concur with your fmdings and proposal for WP 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D (Well Nos. 2301-21 to 32).

We also concur with your assessment of WP 4 wells (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17) and the need to seal these wells. Please complete and return the attached application to abandon/seal Well Nos. 2301-11 to 17.

If you have any questions, please contact Lenore Nakama at 587-0218.

LN:ss Attachment

Sincerely,

~[~ Deputy Director

Page 100: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o A

Amfac Land Company, Limited 700 Bishop Street, Suite 501 • Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

May 8, 1998

Mr. Michael D. W Ison, Chairperson Commission on V\ ater Resource Management Department of La ~d and Natural Resources State of Hawaii P. O. Box 621 Honolulu, HI 96809

'05 " .. -'-';~.

..

Re: Proposal f( r the Disposition of Well Nos. 2301-11 to -17 (WP 4A & 4B) and Well Nos. 2301 21 to -32{WP 2A 2B~ 2C & 2Di, TMK 9-4-2:8-,- Waikele Oahu

Dear Mr. Wilson:

This letter and its enclosures presents the results of our investigation into the condition of the WP2 and WPI. batteries of wells. It also outlines our proposal for the disposition of these wells. Mos of the information presented herein has already been given to and discussed with yo~r staff in meetings at the well sites, and in the CWRM office.

Present Condition of the Wells

Our investigation 0 determine the condition of the wells, involved uncovering well heads, modifying some 0 the manifold piping to allow access, video logging to determine the depths and condit on of the well casings, measuring water levels as a possible indicator of leakage, and crea ing salinity and temperature profiles through the water column of each well. Measuring ~ oint and water level elevations are summarized in Table 1. Casing and well depths are cc mpiled in Table 2. The diameter of all the well casings is 12 inches.

WP 4A and 4B (\1\1 ell Nos. 2301-11 to -171. Apparently, ten wells were drilled at this site but three of them Nos. 18, 19, and 20 on Exhibit 1, were covered over and never used. No trace could be found of them in the field, either at individual well heads or as connected manifo d piping. The other seven wells were found. Each of these has its own individual vault an::l all are manifolded as shown on Exhibit 2.

Based on the sligh Iy lower water levels in these wells compared to WP 2 and WP 1 (Table 1) and the >bserved flow of watet' into the tunnels when the pump was dewatered to provide access 0 the well heads, it s ems probable that these wells are or have the potential to leak into the overlying alluvi m at an undesirable rate. The salinity profiles demonstrate that II seven wells are slig tly brackish (Exhibits 3 to 9).

Telephone: 808-543-8520 • Facsimile: 808-543-8528

Page 101: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o Mr. Michael D. Wil on, Chairperson May 8,1998 Page 2

o

D Well Nos. 2301-21 to -32. These twelve wells were installed in a rectangular patter at 50-foot spacing (E~hibit 10), making them easy to locate. Two of the wells are in th large pump vault, six are in individual vaults which are reasonably intact, and the oth r four had to be unearthed with a backhoe (Nos. 21, 26, 27 and 28 on Exhibit 10). For t ese last four, 12-inch pipe extensions with bolted flange tops were installed to bring t eir well heads abqve ground.

Except for their un esirably shallow casing depths listed in Table 2, all of the WP2 wells were found to be i reasonably good condition. The small dewatering pump in the large pump vault is still perating. It turns on about once every five minutes and runs for only a few seconds, rem ving 10 to 15 gallons of water which had accumulated in its sump over the five-minute int rval. Based on this nominal discharge and the apparently normal water levels in the wells, the leakage rate from this battery of wells is relatively insignificant. The salinity profile also showed that the water quality of the wells is excellent (Exhibits 11 to 22)

Proposed Dispositi n of the Wells

Based on the physi al condition of the WP 4 wells and their slightly brackish water quality, Amfac proposes t seal all seven of them. The sealing process would consist of the following: installa ion of clean basalt gravel to 25 feet below the bottom of the casing; putting five feet of sand as a seal on top of the gravel; and then installing grout to the top of the well casing sing a tremie pipe. After the grout has been allowed to set, each of the well vaults wo Id be backfilled to the ground surface using select borrow material which is free of or anics. The cost of this work is substantial and has not been anticipated in our urrent budget. For this reason, we ask for a period of two years from your acceptance 0 this proposal to complete the work.

Due to the excelle t water quality and relatively good condition of the WP 2 wells, we ask that you allow us t keep the wells as they are. Since they pose no threat to the aquifer and are an asset t Amfac, we are discussing possible arrangements with others for the potential use of th wells.

Page 102: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o Mr. Michael D. Wil on, Chairperson May 8,1998 Page 3

I hope our proposa meets with your approval. Please feel free to call me or our consultant, Tom N nce, if you have any questions or require additional information.

A. Ja es Wriston Manager of Land

Encs.

Page 103: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

" o o Table 1. Benchmark and Water Level Elevations

Job No. 98-20

Benchmark Water Level State Well Benchmark Elevation

Number (Feet MSL) Date of Measurement Feet (MSL)

WP-2 2301-21 Top of Flange 39.28 4-5-98 18.52

4-11-98 18.53

2301-22 Top of Concrete Ring 37.41 4-11-98 18.54

2301-23 Top of Flange 26.80 4-11-98 18.56

2301-24 Top of Flange 18.77 4-11-98 18.55

2301-25 Top of Concrete Ring 33.32 4-11-98 18.56

2301-26 Top of Flange 32.51 4-5-98 18.52

4-11-98 18.52

2301-27 Top of Flange 34.81 4-11-98 18.54

2301-28 Top of Flange 34.80 3-24-98 18.56

4-11-98 18.56

2301-29 Top of Concrete Ring 36.08 4-11-98 18.55

2301-30 Top of Concrete Ring 35.20 2301-31 Top of Concrete Ring 36.30 2301-32 Top of Concrete Ring 39.67

WP-4

2301-11 Top of Concrete Ring 45.43 4-5-98 18.19

4-11-98 18.24

2301-12 Top of Concrete Ring 45.59 4-11~98 18.26

2301-13 Top of Concrete Box 44.59 4-5-98 18.21

4-11-98 18.26

2301-14 Top of Concrete Ring 45.01 4-11-98 18.26 2301-15 Top of Concrete Ring 44.72 3-25-98 18.27

4-11-98 18.28

2301-16 Top of Concrete Ring 44.08 4-11-98 18.25

2301-17 Top of Concrete Box 44.50 4-5-98 18.20

4-11-98 18.25

WP-1

2301-05 Top of Casing 45.00 4-4-98 18.53

4-11-98 18.57

~: All benchmark elevations were surveyed relative to the top of Well No. 2301-05 at the

WP-1 battery.

Page 104: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

Table 2. Casing and Total Depths and Elevations Determined By Video Logging

April 12, 1998

Job No. 98-20

Casing Connecting Manifold Pipe Bottom of the Casing Bottom of the Well State Flange Well Elevation Depth Elevation Depth Elevation Total Depth Elevation

Number (Feet MSL) (Feet) (Feet MSL) (Feet) (Feet MSL) (Feet) (Feet MSL)

WP-2 0 2301-21 39.28 21.0 18.3 64.6 -25.3 416.1 -376.8

2301-22 26.70 9.5 17.2 51.0 -24.3 399.6 -372.9

I

2301-23 26.80 9.0 17.8 47.0 -20.2 407.1 -380.3

2301-24 18.77 0.5 18.3 41.0 -22.2 407.1 -388.3

I ~3Ul-~~ ~t).~n ~.U 1 1.::1 .:IV • .:I -':;".0 "11.0 -"0''. I 2301-26 32.51 14.5 18.0 61.0 -28.5 428.1 -395.6

2301-27 34.81 17.0 17.8 51.0 -16.2 426.6 -391.8

2301-28 34.82 17.0 17.8 46.0 -11.2 418.1 -383.3

2301-29 26.43 9.0 17.4 35.0 -8.6 417.6 -391.2

2301-30 25.42 9.0 16.4 32.0 -6.6 419.2 -393.8

2301-31 26.51 9.0 17.5 28.0 -1.5 416.1 -389.6

2301-32 26.76 9.0 17.8 52.0 -25.2 417.1 -390.3

WP-4 0 2301-11 22.77 6.5 16.3 46.5 -23.7 440.2 -417.4

2301-12 23.04 6.0 17.0 52.5 -29.5 478.2 -455.2

2301-13 23.23 6.0 17.2 > 60.0 ? > -36.8 445.2 -422.0

2301-14 20.71 ? ? 43.0 -22.3 458.2 -437.5

2301-15 20.21 ? ? > 83.0 ? > -62.8 460.7 -440.5

2301-16 22.28 6.5 15.8 > 125.0 ? > -102.7 .'

484.7 -462.4

2301-17 23.28 6.5 16.8 115.0 ? > -91.7 461.2 -437.9

NQ.tn: All depths were measured from the top of flange and are based on the video counter.

1---'

Page 105: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

Pump J1'e//S_Eterationsl .

-l'Ulnp.N~.

1 1 Z 3 4- S /:. 7 8 :7 10 covered Covered 7i:JfJ'1Tee To,,,'./Tee TOfJ,,/Tee ToriTee KJf;Tee Tif'iTet$ 7Op~Tee Tof'<f ElJ.o,r

32.'1 32.7:1 33.54 33.20 32.82 32.80 .5Z- 07 '31. :n

21 22 T~ojTee T"51.

Tee 23 24 25 2' 27 28 2~ 30 G 2,3,,38 2.'7 ."'~ Top,?! Tee To;' oj Tell To~iTt1e 7bp<fTee To/, 0/ Eihow Covered

TDfojElbow TDf'1ELho,..

31 :5Z 33.3~ 32.51 31.84 3J.~5 30.::J1 30.85 3J.t.~ To,. oj E lhO/ll" To;'<>jtLbol1' 31. ,,~ -'1.'8

11 I? 1"1C 1A 1~ 1L 17 IFf 1!:) 20 4 ~4':J To;~TU Toj;,ee TO/,ojTefI To/-,,/£"'01l' Totoj£thow Top'1Tee TopojTee Covered CoYt:red Coyered 18.84 1:1.30 1:7.50 185' 17.:72 1~.5' 1:7 . .54-

~

.5~JS 1 2 3 4 5 , Top oj ElbOW' Top ':I LLhol1' Tol'oJ Elhow Tot1£thorr 1Op1£thol1' 701''1 LOxm"

18.72 18 . .54- JlJ.:J3 J8.::J0 18." 18.87

1 2 3 4 0 ., ,,~13

Hoi/om'; Ttle IIDUQ"'-j Tee .8"lIolftl'litfl IJottom./ Tee .5 " 7 8 :7 J() 8.22 8.03 7· z 7." JJtlltomoj Tee f/JOHOIft'1 1f1e 8oItonttfTee 8olton&; Tee IJoI/Jonc" Tee 801lDmoj Tefl

11 12 13 14 7.7t. 8.Z8 0.10 7.'3 7·8(, 8.05 ~oIt0M4jr_ &JttOHlftTtltI "

Co,-ered. CoYf!red. 8.05 8. '2

7,.7~ 1 z 3 4' .5 , j 8 :; To/, oj Elho,.,. Tof '1 ELho,., 7Of";/Tee TOp oj BhoYI' Tofojt'ife Tol' -J Elbm' T°l'tTet: ''1' "1 Elbo,.,. TOf'ojree

37·(,1 37.5' 37.85 34.53 35.32 34.52 34.~0 34.5&. $4·7D

I ------- l- t

Exhibit 1

Page 106: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0 0 ."

q) ~

~ t\I

~~ () q.

~~ N

~ !:: .a

~ ~ .-or:

A:~ ><

~ W

~ ~ N ~

0;)

.... Gi

~f, ,.

Page 107: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

I=' 0.. 0..

~ z ~

~

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-11 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 27, 1999

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.10-h~~~~~~~~hn~~~~rn~TT~nn~rnMrl~rrhn~+rrn~Trrlh~~rnn4TT~hn~~~~~~69.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 3

() (L

(!) w a -

o

Page 108: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

t=' Q.. 0.90 ~ -~ 0.80 Z ~ 0.70 cJ)

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-12 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 u: C} w

73.0 e. w II:

72.5 :>

~ 72.0 ffi

Q.. ~

71.5 w t-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.10 III II i II I I jill J i J II J i I J I Ii Jill jill J i IIII i IIII i I III i III Ii IIII i I III i IIII i, I J , i, , " i , I , , i , , II i , , , Ii, , , I F69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

[-=SALINrrv - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 4

o

o

Page 109: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~ 0...

t z ::J « CJ)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-13 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 25, 1998

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

.. -69.5

0.101-h~~~~~~~~hnOT+rnn+Orrrlh .. ~nnO+rrnrt~rrhn~+rnnTTTrrlh"rh~'+~nrl"Trhn~~~~69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

\- SALI~ITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 5

0 u: C) w 0 ......

o

Page 110: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

j::' a... a... >-!:: z ::::i <C (/)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-14 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

O. 1 O--+-....,........,-h-,-,--r-h,...,...,.-r+-rr-r..,..-t-rr-r....rrrr....r-rrrrt"-rrrTi.,-T"rl-rr,.-nh-T,.,-t-n,..,-t-nnoTrrrTTrrrr-t"T-rrrtT-rrrh...-r,.-t.,rrr..,..-t-rrr-r+-69. 0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 6

o u:-C) ·w c ---II: :::J l-e;( II: w a... ~ w I-

o

Page 111: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

i=' D..

~ z ~

~

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-15 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 27.1998

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.10-l-r'T"T"1rl-r,....rh-"T'T'1r+-rT'T'1+r"...,r+r-rrr+rrrr-M-rn-M-TTT+rrrr+rrrr-M-TTT+rrrr+rrrr+rrn+rrrr+rrrr+rrn+nrrr-h-rrr+-69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEED

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 7

o -u.

Cl w C -a: ::J ..... « a: w D.. ~ w .....

o

Page 112: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~ 0-0-

>-t: z ::J ~

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40 ··· .... ······j· .. ······ .. ·l .. · .. ·····t" .... ··· .. ·T···· .... · 0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-16 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.1 OI-h.......,......t-.......,..-r-h""T""T""..-i-r.......,..rh.,.,.-rl-r"T""T""1r+,--rnr+,-"T""T""1ri-r-rnri-rTT1rl-rTl1ri-rTT1ri-r".,rl-rTT1ri-r,-,-,ri-r"...,rl-rTT1+r.".,ri-rT""T""1ri-r..,..,r+- 69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 8

0 (L

CJ w 0 -

0

Page 113: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

WELL 2301-171N THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

1.5O=r--r~-rT-Y-rT!-i---r-----r-r--~----;-.-----:---;--:-----'------r-76.0

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00 I=' 0.. 0.90 0.. ----->-!:: 0.80 z ~ 0.70 en

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 u: (!l LU

73.0 e, w II:

72.5 ::J t-<C

72.0 ffi 0.. ~

71.5 LU t-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.10 II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I II I I I II I I I i I I I I II I I I F69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET) .

[== SALINITY -=-- TEMPERATURE]

Exhibit 9

o

o

Page 114: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o

~ Ot--_Si_.,O_.,.O;....-_--t,

~ O>--_.;:4:;.:;:!J.;;..:;:.!J~i_~

o

Q .... := .a s:. >C W

---------*-

Page 115: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

I=' Q.

~ z :::i 0( en

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-21 IN THE WP-2WELL BATTERY MARCH 24, 1998

!

::·::.:::::::.:r::::::::::I.:::::::::::::r::::·::::::::1..:::::'::::::1.::'::::::::1:::::::::::.:1:::::::::'::::[::::::::::1::::':::::::::1:::::::::.::::1'::::::':':::1.::::::::::::.1::::'::::.:.::1':':':::':.: .. :[: .. :.: .. ':.'1::.'::':::::.::

~ -_·············r········· __ ····

...... _._ ...... .t ... __ ..... u ••• ~ •••• u ••••••••• l. ... _ ........ . I I I

j~I==I::l--'r:I:F==F=F:F:l~'lr:111

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 i'.L CJ w

73.0 c -72.5

a: ::l

~ 72.0 a:

w Q..

71.5 ::E w t-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5 ··············l············l············l·············r·············r···········l············l············l············"\""·············"1""·············"1""············l··············r············"I""·············"I"·············.\ ............... . 0.16 69.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit ~ __ _

o

o

Page 116: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

i=' Q. 0.24 Q. ...... t 0.23 z ~ 0.22 CJ)

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-22 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATTERY MARCH 24, 1998

.i !

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 u: Cl w

73.0 e. w a:

72.5 :J t-<C

72.0 ffi Q.

::E 71.5 w

t-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.16 II II I i I I I I i I I I I i II I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I II i I I I I i I I I I I 69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 12

o

o

Page 117: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

.:- 0.24 0-0-

t 0.23 z :::i 0.22 ~

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-23 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATTERY MARCH 24,1998

r--T- :-!--tt=~J.!J.:I::;:!! .. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.I, ...... :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.·.! .. :: .. :,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.1 .. :::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.! ... ::.:,.:.:.: ... :.: ... : ..... :.:.:.: ... :.! ..... :I.: ..... :.:.:.:.:.·.:.:.:.:.: ... :.,! ... ::,.: ......... : ... :.:.:.:.:.: ... :.:.j .. :~.::.: ... : ... :.: ... :.:.'.:.:.:.'.:. :~T=~T~::r::I~I--t--+-i-- .

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 13

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5 o 74.0

.-.. 73.5 u.

Cl w 73.0 C -w 72.5 ::J

~ 72.0 II: w

0-

71.5 ~ w t-

71.0

70.5

70.0 o 69.5

Page 118: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

t=' n.. n.. -t z ::::i « en

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-24 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATIERY MARCH 24, 1998

l

. . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . --:::·:::-:-:::[:::::--:::1::::::::::::1::::::::::::1:::: .. ::::::::[:::::--:-:1::::::::::::1::::::::::::::[::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::r:::-:::::::::r:::-:::::::-:r:::::--:-:::J:::::-::: .. :::1:::::::-:---::1::::-:----:::1:--:--:--:--__ :

-------+---------------t---------------t---------------t---------------r-------------r-------------r------------r------------T--------------r-------------r-------------r--------------

-_·····.··········· .. ···I··········u ... ..} ................ 1 ..... __ · ................. __ ......•.......... ____ .. , ............... .

, i !tlll: : : : :

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.16--l-T-rr-rt..,.,,....,t-r-r-r1-h-,-,--rt,.,-,..,-t--T-,rn-+-rIT.,.;-..,.,rrt-r-"'rhlT-rt..,.,,....,+-r-rr-rf-r-r1--rl-rr-rr+-r,,r+-ro--1r-r-1..,-,.,.,.+69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 14

0 CL ci w a -w

0

Page 119: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

I=" 0... 0...

~ z ::i ea:: CIJ

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-25 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATTERY MARCH 24. 1998

jI~I::::];~~-~[]---T:II:II:]~]:~lr

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5 -\\--I-j-j-l----j---i---j---1111!1--l 0.16 69.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 15

o (L

Cl w c -a: ::l I-ea:: a: w 0... ~ w I-

o

Page 120: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

I=' 0.. 0..

~ z ::J ~

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

............... "[ ....... .

! i ............... ~ ................ ':" ... . i ~ : :

WELL 2301-26 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATIERY MARCH 24, 1998

i

:: :: :::::::::

··········t···············t···············t···············t···············"\"·······:::::::1::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::.1::':::::::::::1:::::::::::::""1.::'::::::.:::::1:..: .... :: ... :.:

'········'I:lt[: l-·I-I-lllr-lliilt ---i-----il

.................................. " ...••••••••••••• .; .•••.•••••••••••• ,. .................................. .c ...................................... u .......... -J. •••••••••••••••••• ···············f··············· .. ················I················1················ .. .

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

0 74.0

73.5 u:-Cl w

73.0 C -72.5

a: ::J

~ 72.0 a:

w 0..

71.5 ~ w I-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5 \-.\ \--1----I-\-j----1-+---I---I-l--1 1 II 0.16 69.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 16 -------------------

Page 121: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

t=' 0.24 Q. Q.

t 0.23 z :::i 0.22 ~

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

0.16

WELL 2301-27 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATTERY MARCH 22, 1998

i 76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

................•......... ····{o········· .. ····.;················4···············..;.· .............. "" ............... .;. ............... ..;. ....... · .. ······l················.········ .. ······I············· .... ················1············--··1················1 ................ , ............... . 74.0

:::-~~:::~~:::;~-~:::l==~:-:I:I:II::II:: 73.5

73.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

300 325 350 375 400

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

69.0 425

Exhibit 17

o (L

Cl w C -w ;:) t-<{ a: w Q.

~ w t-

o

Page 122: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

P a. 0.24 a. -~ 0.23 Z ~ 0.22 en

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-28 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATIERY MARCH 24, 1998

mmm+rl=".'.r~f:=t::±:::L;;;;lmm mmmmdmlmmm+mLmmLmmm::L~' t:"'i ~

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 ~ Cl w

73.0 e. w a:

72.5 :::> l-e:(

72.0 ffi a. ::;

71.5 w I-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.16 I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I F69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

ExhibiL~ ____ _

e

--

Page 123: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

~ 0.. 0.24 0.. ..... ~ 0.23 z ~ 0.22 f/)

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

1:--i==l:=~:I::

WELL 2301-29 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATIERY MARCH 24, 1998

'=jmlmmlmj-mmj=tfF'I::-"m~mf~!mr-!mm! ...... : ................ : ................ : ........ .

d±=I.. .. ~ ~

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 u: (!) w

73.0 e. w a:

72.5 ::J l-e(

72.0 ffi 0.. :E

71.5 w I-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5 l:F:r:l:~:+:::F::l::=F:=F:~r~:I:~:r:+lil: 0.16 II II I i I I I I i I I I I i II I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I II i I I I I i I I I I I 69.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY --=-iEMPERATURE-]

Exhibit 19

o

o

Page 124: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

t=' Il.. Il..

t z :J 0( en

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-30 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATTERY MARCH 24, 1998

i

::=I:f:=Jl:·~:il::=~==1:~:··I~I::I::I:~::I::~111 : . .. : ::::::::

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

O. 16-h--.-.-rt"T"T'.,-,-+-rr-rtrhrrr.-+"T"T'TTf-rr-rtrhl'T.-+"TTTT'+-rr-rtrh-".-+,.,-TT'1-rrr-r+-r-rt""T"1IT,.,-+-r-rrr-Mrnrr--t-,--,-,.,+69. 0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEEn

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 20

o ...... LL

Cl w 0 -a: ::> t-o( a: w a.. ::E w t-

o

Page 125: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

0.30

0.29

0\28

0.27

0.26

0.25

~ D.. 0.24 D.. -~ 0.23 z ~ 0.22 en

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-31 IN THE WP-2 WELL BATTERY MARCH 24, 1998

.

:~:~~r~l····~l~:ll:~~:~=--'l·~=r:l::rrlll ?:I:I::t~t!:j~:jtj:llj

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5 o 74.0

73.5 ~ Cl w

73.0 e. m-a:

72.5 ::>

~ 72.0 ffi

D.. ~

71.5 w t-

71.0

70.5

70.0 o

69.5

0.16 II II I i I I I I i I I I I i II I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I II i I I I I i I I I I F69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

[- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

ExhibIL~~ _____________ _

Page 126: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

r=-Q. Q. -~ z :J <C en

0.30

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.25

0.24

0.23

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.18

0.17

WELL 2301-32 IN THE WP-2WELL BATTERY MARCH 24, 1998

i ! i .. ··.········· .. ·· ...... i·············· .. i· .. ···· ... ·· ... .

1 i

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

o. 16-h-r-r-.-t-r-r-r-r-i--r"T"""T"-r+..,.........,.......h-,-,-,,.-t,"'...,...-t....,-rr-+-r-rT...,--t"T""T""T""T"+-r-,.........-t-............ h-,..,.-r+-,,...,...,r-r-i"'-r-r-+-r"""T""T-rl--r-r ..... +r.,..,...,-I-69. 0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

Exhibit 22

o Ii' c:J w 0 -w ::) I-<C a: w Q. ~ w I-

o

Page 127: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o ~&.-~ UPDATB OF STAFF' S RBCO'MMlmI~TIONS FOR OAHU SUGAR WELL CLOSURES ~_ ~(

Ap il 9, 1998 wJ.L p. Chronology of Eyents

1. February 18, 1998: CW revoked the WUPs for Oahu Sugar Co. wells WP 2A, 2B (Well os. 2301-21 to ,26), WP 2C, 2D (Well Nos. 2301-27 to 32), a d WP 4A, 4B (Well Nos. 2301-11 to 20).

2. Late February to Mid M rch, 1998: Oahu Sugar Co., located and exposed all wells to a cess from the ground surface for WP 2A, 2b, 2C, & 2D, and 11 but three wells for WP 4A, 4B.

3. March 24, 1998: Oahu S 19 wells with a salini determined the depth 0 was installed in one w

gar Co. consultant, Tom Nance, logged y and temperature probe, and

each well. A water level data logger 11.

4. Late March to Early Ap il, 1998: Roscoe Moss Drilling Co. video logged 19 wells 0 view the condition and length of casing and the geologi al formations penetrated by each well.

5.

6.

7.

Early April, 1998: Tom exposed well and measu determined that the st about 0.3 feet lower t battery and WP 1 batte

April 6, 1998: CWRM st the field to examine t appurtenances and pho the WP 2 and WP 4 batt copies of all salinity

April 9, 1998: CWRM st to examine options for possible future use of with a preliminary tab bench marks, and water

Future Actions

Nance surveyed in bench marks for each ed water levels in each. He tic water levels in WP 4A, 4B were

water level elevations in WP 2

ff met Jim Wriston and Tom Nance in e condition of wells and pump ographed all of the exposed wells in ries. Tom Nance provided staff with and temperature profiles obtained.

ff met with Jim Wriston and Tom Nance abandonment, sealing, capping, and/or the wells. Tom Nance provided staff e showing well and casing depths, level elevations.

1. Middle to Late April, 998: Staff to view video logs of wells.

2. Middle April to early ay, 1998: Oahu Sugar Co. to submit preliminary plans on d sposition of wells.

3. May, 1998: Make draft ecommendations for final disposition of these wells.

4. May 1998: Re-evaluate draft recommendations with Oahu Sugar Co.

s. June, 1998: Brief on the final recommendations at the June 1998 CWRM meeting

Page 128: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

· " o

WP2 PUMP ROOM

Page 129: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

· '\0 o o

ONE OF THE WP2 WELLS. NOTICE CONDITION OF CASING.

Page 130: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o ,.

Page 131: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o

FLOODED WP4 PUMP ROOM

Page 132: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o

Page 133: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o

ONE OF THE WP4 WELLS. NOTICE WATER OUTSIDE OF WELL CASING IN FLOODED HEADER TUNNEL. I

I

Page 134: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

o o

' ... ,'.

Page 135: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

APR 13 ' 98 20: 09 FQ: TIllIE o 10m NaQCe Water

........ Resource Eaairtminl

+808-538-1151 1 ... T P.01104 F-381

I ..... ·~,,!' 'I

o .VtI.~ _,.;;; .... w&..-,.;;;--=-__

, ,..". ...... --. ... a--... . dal . .,~.,..., Jll!."""V._:::!l . ~"""-"'!:n1 ",~, "FaciiirdleHeader"

1b:----=fje)¥~Ori~·JiuI~· -:-~~wlIr:=,:;;,I~7.:J-~M~be~.,~iW":'""ID:...~;..-;.~~:..=:...-- ::0.: -Ate-:-::--:----ct-,,-(f'}--,-

==-.~:~:::.;...~-~'l(:-.. ...;:om~;::9{f._;.fb_:anee=r._::....;.~~-~;:'-·-4=:-'-___ ~-_-_-_~-_-_-_-;tl;:.;. .. ,._N_:~..;. .. :r;....7Paaca_~ljf'_~~_." ...:. .... ~_'~_.~2,,_1f;:...:.:;_";_'l:f:_q_*der)_. _

I

. ". \t., '

"." .' .. t

.'

~ ______ --L ______________ '.' -

Page 136: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

I APR 13 'SI 20:10 FROM:TNWRE 0 +101-531-! T-941 P. 02/04 F-311

State Well Number

WP-2 1801-21

a801-22 2301-28 a801-24 a801-25 2801-28

2301-27

2301-28

2301-21

2301-30 2801-81 2301-82

WP-4 2801-11

2301-14 2301-15

2301-18 2301-17

WP-l 2301-06

Top or Flange

Top 01 COncneI RkIg Tap 01 FIInga

Top or FIIrVt Tap Of COnarIItI RIng

Top or FIanai "--- ,,.

Tgp of Flange

Top GI Flange

Top of ConanM RIng

Top 01 eonc.. Ring Tap ~ ConCI'If8 Ring Tep of Canoret8 Ring

Benohrnark Water level Elevatian ,.:,.. '7, : '''' ",,,,ej, ';'f,

(Feat MSLf oat. ~. MeuuranaIt Feet (MSL)

38.28 -'-5-88 18.62 4-11-98 18.58

:~::!::! ~::: .,:'·~~1?~?· .. ~::: ' 18.77 4-11-88' '-7""18~65

_ ..... 3~.U.,.,< _.~.,,~ _", . ~-B.:!! ,.-.,.... 1-~ ..... tl·J8 -- .. 0- ' . ~ •. - .•. -, . 12 ........ 51".,~ .. :. '- . _.4.-'-08 .. iL';" ; ;i,t;i;i;~1".52 ':';" • -.. ' :';~~1""" 4~'fl;18 '.. -"\"';1;+1l" 18:&2 ..

34.81 4-11-18 18.54 34.80 3·24-98 18.58

38.08 •. -, '}, 85.20'" 81.80 ' SIl.57

45.43

4-11-88 18.58 4-11-88 18.55

18.18 18.24

Tap at CancNtIII Ring 46.&8

4-5-88 4-11-88 4-11-88

4-6-98 18.28

Top 01 Canarete Box 44.59

Top of Conc:I'IIa Ring Tap 01 CGncraII RIng

Tap of concnte Ring Top Of Concnte Box

Tap of CasIng

I

45.01 44.72

44.08 44.50

45.00

4-11-88 4-11-88 3-2S-88 4-11-88 '

4-11-98 4-5-88

i 18.21 • 18.26

18.26 18.27 18.28 18.2& --18.20

4-11-88 18.25

4-'-la 4-11-8'8

18.&3

18.57

ltQSu; All benchmark eIeYa1Jant were surveyed NIdve to the top of Well No. a801-o5 at the _ WP-1 battery.

Page 137: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

Staa w.a

Number

WP-2 2301·21 2801·22 2801-28 2301-24 a ... ". _aa. ,-2801-28 2101-27 2301-2B 2801-29 ' 2801-80 2301-31 2301-32

WP-4 2301 .. 11 2801-12 '

2801-18 2801-14

2801-1& 2801-18 2101-17

J!JQ1a: ,

car .. _d Toll' Depth_ end EleVlltlanl "ermrned .f Vfdeo ....... ,

Aprtl 12. 1898

Job No. 9BJlO

CUIng Flange

erwatlon (Fl. MSL)

Bottom cI the CUIng Bottom of the Well

3'.28 28.70 28.80 11.77 .... "' .. ...... 32.51 84.B1 34.82 28.43 2&.42 2e.51 2e.78

22.77 23.04 23.23 20.7.

20.21 22.28 23.28

21.0

'.6 '.0 0.5 ... ... v.v

" 14.6 ! 11.0

, 17.0 8.0

"

'.0 9.0 9.0

8.& 8.0

'.0 ? ? '.5 8.6

Depth Elavaton (Feet) (feet N81.)

18.3 17.2

17.' 18.8 ._-.,.. '~',,"- au.a \

81.0 '! 18.0 " 17.8 61.0 ~

17.8 ,~: ", 48.0 .i. 17.4:',36.0

",~' ,.:

18.4 " ,32.0 • 17.5 28.D 17.. 62.0

18.3 , '48.S ' ..

17.0 '~1,~t::S2.& : 17.2 ~l;;, '~' eo.O ? ~ ? ,;,~, , 48.0 ~

:r"lfV~'i f1r: "

? " ,. 88.0 ? .. • ¥' 1

15.B ~ 125.0? . 18.8.. 11&.0? :

-Xit.D '

:, ,-2B.& "' -18.2 .~

:,;,:"11.1 '. ;' "~8.tI "

.',~' ~8.e ') -1.6 'I

-25.2

,;:t:i~~3. 7 ,:J~ " y::;la,.ll;~ \;'. ':',.: .... ,

-ft. a ·>"-e2.1'~

,. -1~.1 ,. -sn.7

TotaI~ (Faat)

41 •• 1, '"

, 3t1.8 '-"J . 407.1 ,;:~ 407.1 411.8

428.1 428.8 418.1 417.' 419.2 411.1 417.1

.440.2 471.2 445.2 4 •• 2 .eo.7 4114.7 481.2

Elevallon (Feet MSl)

-378.8 -372.9 -3BO.3 -388.3 -384.7 -395.6 -391.B ·38S.3 -391.2 -383.8 ·389.8 -390.3

'417.4 ·455.2 ·422.0 ·437.5 -440.& -46204 -437.9

---- -- -- -------------------------------- - -----'---~.J~-

I

j •

.. ..

.. ~ • " , ~

1 " ~ ~

· , · · • J 4 • • ~ f j ..

-... ... -.... c::t -c::t

.. CoD .... ..... :u c::t ... ~ .... .... I ... ~

Page 138: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

WELL NO. 2301-26 IN 1HE WP-2BA:IIEf4Y APNL e 10 12. 1998

18·~~--------~1--------~--------~·~------~r---------~------~~------~

I I

--t-- -+---~--'---4--."--'---'-'-I---"'--"""-""-.'" .. __ ._. --+-----t. ---~------t----I--.. ---..... --......

"''''''lL -i----.-1--. . ....... --'-t----, ............ - ... ,-----l----...-....-'

18..1&--1----

I

---.. ·-...... ·-·· .. ·-· .. ·1------· --------......... -..... f. ..... -------.. --

I --_· .. · .. --1-----·-

--....... --t-----.-+--.-.... --... ,:,' 1

1a2~e+-~-r-.r-+7--r-T--r~8--r-~~--8~~~-.~~10--r-~~:T-~1~,~--~~-f~2~~,-~~13

DAYINAPAfI.I_ ~- I

"",,' \.

Co>

CD -.... co

+ -co -• ... Co> -.!.

-~

:;,.1 -~-~- --- -----]4-~--------------------------------------

Page 139: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

Author: Glenn Bauer at D~TER_RESOURCE 4/9/1998 6:32 AM Date:

Priority: Normal TO: Roy Hardy TO: Eric Hirano TO: Lenore Nakama TO: Ed Sakoda Subject: WP4 Pump House Water Sample

-----~~:-~:::~-::~~~:-:~::-~::-::~~:c:::s1:eM:::::n::o~-:~:-~~::~:~-~::-~~~~--------------house has a chloride concentration o~ 235 ppm. This a composite sample from wells leaking into the tunnels ~hat carry the header pipes back to the pump room. This chloride concentration provides some indication of the quality of water leaking out into the perhaps the Waikele stream alluvium and possibly the basalt aquifer below it. Leaking wells provide a conduit for poorer quality deep water to enter higher in the formations.

Page 140: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~\vet v~ ~ \...)~cs

o o 4/'1{1~;

\ Casing Depths and Total Depth Determined By Video Logging

Depth to Depth to Depth to the Total State Well Water Manifold Pipe BoHom of Casing Depth

Number (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet)

WP-2

2301-21 21.0 21.0 64.6 416.1

2301-22 8.0 9.5 51.0 399.6

2301-23 8.5 9.0 47.0 407.1

2301-24 0.2 0.5 41.0 407.1

2301-25 8.5 9.0 50.5 411.6

2301-26 14.0 14.5 61.0 428.1

2301-27 16.0 17.0 51.0 426.6

2301-28 16.0 17.0 46.0 418.1

2301-29 8.0 9.0 35.0 417.6

2301-30 8.0 9.0 32.0 419.2

2301-31 8.5 9.0 28.0 416.1

2301-32 8.5 9.0 52.0 417.1

WP-4

2301-11 5.0 6.5 46.5 440.2

2301-12 5.5 6.0 52.5 478.2

2301-13 5.5 6.0 >60 ?? 445.2

2301-14 2.5 ? 43.0 458.2

2301-15 2.5 ? >83 ?? 460.7

2301-16 5.5 6.5 >125 ?? 484.7

2301-17 6.0 6.5 115? ? 461.2

~: All depths measured from the top of flange are based on the video counter.

Page 141: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

- o \

Benchmark and Water· Level Elevations

~

I Benchmark Water Level State Well Benchmark i Elevation

Number (Feet MSL) Date of Measurement Feet (MSL)

WP-2

2301-21 Top of Flange i 39.28 4-5-98 18.52

2301-22 I I

2301-23

2301-24

2301-25

2301-26 Top of Flange 32.51 4-5-98 18.52

2301-27 Top of Flange 34.81

2301-28 Top of Flange 34.80 3-24-98 18.56

2301-29 Top of Concrete Ring 36.08

2301-30

2301-31

2301-32

WP-4

2301-11 Top of Concrete Ring 45.43 4-5-98 18.19

2301-12 Top of Concrete Ring 45.59

2301-13 Top of Concrete Box 44.59 4-5-98 18.21

2301-14 Top of Concrete Ring 45.01

2301-15 Top of Concrete Ring 44.72 3-25-98 18.27

2301-16 Top of Concrete Ring 44.08

2301-17 Top of Concrete Box 44.50 4-5-98 18.20

WP-1

2301-05 Top of Casing 45.00 4-4-98 18.53

~: All benchmark elevations were surveyed relative to the top of Well NO.1.

Page 142: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

~ 0.90 0... 0... -~ 0.80 z :::i 0.70 « w

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-11 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 27, 1998

············r··········T··········T···········r···· ...... T···········r···· .. ····r· .......... r· .. · .... r .......... r .. ·········r··········l .. ·· .... ···T ............ r·· ...... ·l .... ·· .. ·· .. r .. ·········r··········r···········r·········· ·· ... · .. ··.··t······.·······;.·············;.·············1··············5·············1··············).······· ...... { ......................................................... , .............. ;. ............. .;. ............. ;. .. ···········1··············1·············.············· ............... .

11111:11:1:::11.1[11111:11 !·111·111\·11·111\11111

............. 1 .......................... · .•...... ·······1··············.·············.············· .. ········· .... .( ..............•.............•..............•..... ···· .. ··.··············).·············"'·············50·············1··············1·············1··············~ ............ .

! ! ~ ! ! 1 1 ill 1 1 ! ! ! ! 1 ! !

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

e (L

CJ w c -a: ::J

~ a: w 0... ::!! w t-

--~ ~ < ~

t 1

~ S -€""" ~ ---~ ~ t:::><l l

R\

Page 143: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

f=" 0. 0.

t: z :J ~

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-12 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 25, 1998

::::':.: .. ::-1.:::::':: .. ::1:.:':.:: .. :[:' .. :::':1:: .. :.::: .. 1:· .. :·.:.::1::.··::.:::1::::::.::::r:::::::::1::::::::::::[::::::::::1:::::::::::1::::::::::::[::.:::::1::::::::::r::::·:::::1:::.::::::"1:::::.:.:.::[·.:: .. :·:1:.:: .. :'::::

I\JIJI:1:1\~:II~11:J:1:!~::iJ 1111111-[1[---l-I--j--IiI111

···.···.· .... , ............. ·10· .. ··········).·············,·············4·············,··············.·············.:-·············.·············1··············.····· ........ , ..................... ·· .. ·· ... ············4·············1··············1······ ....... , .............. ~ ............ . i l ~ iii i ~ l iii iii iii l

:

············r···········r·········l···········r···········r··········T···········r········l··········l··········r···········r··········T··········r···· ····r·········r··········T··········T···········r···· .. ·····r··········· ••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••• ). •••••••••••• .a, •••••••••••• ·,··············.·············1··············10·············4-············ .. ·············1··············1·············1··············.···· ....... f. •.•••••••••• 4- •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , •••• ·········1··············.·············

11JI:II:J:Jl:~_J::II:.LJ:jI111 lfT-liii\-'ilr--;LI-j-j-lll

·············1·············..;.·············;.········· .. ··1··············.·············1······ .. ······•········ .. ···f.·· .. •••••••• .... •· .. •• .. •••••• .. ••• ...... ·,· .. • ...... ···I·· .. · .. ·· ................... f. ..................... H ............................................ ~ •••••••••••••

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

12.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5 flll-ll·j--ll-I--lfllllill 0.10 69.0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

0 CL

" UJ 0 -a: :> .... « a: UJ 0. ::::1i UJ ....

0

Page 144: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

I=' Q. Q. -~ Z :::::; e( en

WELL 2301-13 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

1.50 1~--~--~--~--~--'---~--~--'---~--~--'---~--~--'---~--~--'---'---'----r76.0

1.40 '-75.5

1.30 75.0

1.20 74.5

1.10 74.0

1.00 73.5

0.90 73.0

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

: .: . : : : : : ' : : . : : : : : : :

Iltl::lIII1··[ll:LI:l~::[JIJ

11Jl:J:.~Jlljllljl:I!·:11 .n iii i . . . . . . . . . . : ! ! ! ! 1 .,.....,! i • i : : : : : : · .. ·········T·· .. ···mr· ........ r .. ··· .... ··j . . r"'''' .. · .. r· ........ ·r ........ r· .... · .... r .. · ..... ·· .. : ............. : ............. : .. · ..... ·· .. r·········r .. ··=t=m·r· ...... ·· .. r ........... ··[""· ...... ... ............. , .............. ,. ............. ;. ........... ··,··············1·············1··············.······· ...... .( ............................ , ..............•............. , ............. 4> ••••••••••••• .( •••••••••••••• $.············.··············1··· ......... · •........ · .. · .. ;. ............ .

11111Ij--l+--[-I-jlI111[1 0.10 69.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

1- SALINITY -- TEMPERATURE

0 tL:' CJ w c -a: ::l l-e( a: w 0.. ::E w I-

Page 145: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

~ 0.90 0.. 0..

~ 0.80 z ::J 0.70 ~

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-14 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 25, 1998

! ············r··········r·········r··········r···········r··········r··········r··········r·········r··········r···········l···········r··········r··········r·········r··········r··········T···········r··········r···· ...... . ·············I··············~·············).··········· .. 1 ..............•.............•.............. ;. ............. "" .............•............. 1 .............. 1.· .......................... ;. ............. "" .................. ··········.··············1·············.··············;. ............ .

111!--111\111---I-\--llllll .......... ··.1··.···········.· .. ···········.·············1··············1·············.··············.·············""·············;.·············.··············1··· ........................ .,. ............................. ;. ... ··········1··············.·············1············· .~ ............ .

11111-fllllll111!:I-11 .............•.............. ~ ............ ..). ............ ·1··············.·············.·············..).·············~·············40·············.··············.·············1······· ...... ..:,.· .. ······.··.4-·.··········4-····· ........•............ -.......... .... . .......... ~ ............ .

! t i ! i i ! ! iii ! ! ! i !! !

1- SALINITY -- TEMPERATURE

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

0 74.0

73.5 r.L C) w

73.0 a -72.5

a: ::l

~ 72.0 a:

w 0..

71.5 ~ w t-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

Page 146: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

j::' 0.. 0.90 0..

----~

~ 0.80 z ~ 0.70 (/)

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-15 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 27, 1998

':IJII]II:llL:j::J::Lj:Jj~:IJj~:::: 7-4

7-4

,.5

,.0

~

"'''',.5 . C) w

73.0 e. w a: ::>

0.10 II I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i II I I i I I I I i I I I I i II I I i I II I i I I I IIII1 I II III II I I III II I II I I I II II I II I I I III II II I I I i I I I I F69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

I=::SAI..INITY~ TEMPERATliREJ

o

o

Page 147: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

~ Q.

~ Z :::i e( en

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40 . .

·············i·············.;············.;·············: .......... . ! i 1 ~

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-16 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATTERY MARCH 25, 1998

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5

73.0

72.5

72.0

71.5

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

o. 1 01-+-.""'T'"T".,-i-,r-r"T-ri-~-ri-,.,....-.-+-T""T""T-.-i-T"T"1,.+'T"T""r-r+...,.....-T'"T""i""1'"'T"T""T"-iCT-T-r-r-h-T.,....,..t-r.......,..+,-,F'"T""T+r-rT"T+rT"'T"T+r..,.,...ri-T.,...,...-h""1'"'T".,-i-,...,..,.-ri-,..,....-.+- 69. 0

o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

\- SALINITY - TEMPERATURE

0 G:" Cl LU C -a: :::> t-e( a: LU Q. ::E LU t-

0

Page 148: (jw;~TUl · Oshima Chun Fong & Chung represents Oahu Sugar Company, Ltd. in this matter. The Commission staff has recommended that three water use permits (WUP 129, 130, and 131)

1.50

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10

1.00

i=' D.. 0.90 4--~ 0.80 z ;t 0.70 fJ)

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

WELL 2301-17 IN THE WP-4 WELL BATIERY MARCH 25, 1998

d.dd:t!I!t!tt:tl~tjltf \ \ \

76.0

75.5

75.0

74.5

74.0

73.5 u:: Cl w

73.0 e. w a:

72.5 ::J I-0:(

72.0 ffi D.. :::E

71.5 w I-

71.0

70.5

70.0

69.5

0.10 II I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I j I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I i I I I I j I I I I i I I I I i I I I I j I I I I j I I I I F69.0 o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500

DEPTH INTO WATER (FEET)

I=-SALINITY -_. - TEMPERATURE

" \

e

o