k- 710 professional ethics by mr. lokendra singh
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
1/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"
!"#$! "&'()*
$))+,-&$.(!(&/ 0+1
!$2/"1* $-3
."-)'4.$1
1"!$&(+-*
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
2/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#
!5678 "9:; *;6?;@;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
3/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
C
15,8+5,8&* >= +%& 5*%&)&8-& 58* (>.&)/58-& (0 5 .&+ (0 A)(0&..,(85? 8()1. >=
+%(.&
'%( 5*(A+ +%,. A)(0&..,(8; @+ ,. 38('. 5. ?&&+'&&8 D&8-%
58* D5)
,8 +%& A)(1(+,(8 (0 %,?,.% %(8()5>?& 58*
05,)*&5?,8?,.% 5
.A,),+ (0 >)(+%&)%((* ',+% >5);
"&'()* +0 !"#$! A1+0"**(+-
B57?;?6C -79DE5 7?F -55F
F)(0&..,(85? &+%,-. 5)& 5 .&+ (0 8()1. () -(*&. (0 -(8*:-+7 .&+ >= A&(A?& ,8 5
.A&-,0,-
A)(0&..,(8; G -(*& (0 &+%,-. ,. *&/&?(A&* 0() &5-% A)(0&..,(8; H:AA(.& =(:
'),+&
5)+,-?&. ,8 5 8&'.A5A&); F)(0&..,(85? &+%,-. )&I:,)& +%5+ =(: /&),0= 05-+. >&0()&
=(:
F&(A?& 5)& .:)A),.&* '%&8 +%&= %&5) +%5+ ?5'=&). 5)& &JA&-+&* +( 0(??('
A)(0&..,(85?
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
4/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
K
&+%,-. 58* +%5+ +%&= 5)& 5--(:8+5>?& 0() *,.%(8&.+7 ,))&.A(8.,>?& 58*
:8A)(0&..,(85?
>&%5/,(); L:)+%&)7 1(.+ A&(A?& *( 8(+ 38(' +%5+ ?5'=&). ,8 @8*,5 -58 ?(.& +%&
?,-&8.&
+( A)5-+,-& ,0 +%&= 5)& 0(:8*
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
5/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
O
A1+0"**(+-$! "&'()*
*5= +%& M%,&0 P:.+,-& (0 @8*,5; @+ %5. >&&8 15*& -?&5)
+%5+ 58=
):?&. 15*& ,8 )&?5+,(8 +( +%& .+58*5)*. (0 A)(0&..,(85? -(8*:-+ 58* &+,I:&++&
+( >&
(>.&)/&* >= +%& 5*/(-5+&. 58* ,8 0()-& >&0()& +%& -(11&8-&1&8+ (0 +%&
G*/(-5+&.
4G1&8*1&8+6 G-+7 "QRC7 .%5?? -(8+,8:& ,8 0()-&7 :8+,? 5?+&)&* () )&A&5?&* ()
51&8*&*
,8 5--()*58-& ',+% +%& A)(/,.,(8. (0 +%,. 5-+;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
6/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
S
M%5A+&) @@ (0 A5)+ T@ (0 +%& ):?&. 0)51&* >= +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 *&5?. ',+%
+%&
.+58*5)*. (0 A)(0&..,(85? -(8*:-+ 58* &+,I:&++&; @+ -(8+5,8. .&/&)5? ):?&.
'%,-% ?5=
*('8 +%& .+58*5)*. (0 A)(0&..,(85? -(8*:-+ 58* &+,I:&++&; $%&.& ):?&. .A&-,0=+%&
*:+,&. (0 58 5*/(-5+& +( +%& M(:)+7 -?,&8+7 (AA(8&8+ 58* -(??&5& *,.-:..&* 5. 0(??('U
3D9O 9HP7EF=
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
7/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
R
$%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 %5. 15*& -&)+5,8 ):?&. .( 5. +( A)&.-),>& *:+,&. (0 58
5*/(-5+& +( +%& -(:)+; H:-% *:+,&. 15= >& &JA?5,8&* 5. 0(??('
"6 V:),8< +%& A)&.&8+5+,(8 +%& -5.& 58* '%,?& 5-+,8< (+%&)',.& 5. 58 5*/(-5+&
>&0()& +%& -(:)+ ,+ ,. )&I:,)&* +( -(8*:-+ %,1.&?0 ',+% *,1,+ %,. &5),8< ,8 1,8* +%5+ +%& *,= 58= ,??&,+. +%& A),/5+& -(11:8,-5+,(8 ',+% +%&
E:*= ,??&&.+ &00()+ +( )&.+)5,8 58* A)&/&8+
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
8/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
X
%,. -?,&8+ 0)(1 )&.()+,8< +( .%5)A () :805,) A)5-+,-& (AA(.,+& 0)(1 -(:8-,?
() A5)+,&. '%,-% +%& 5*/(-5+& %,1.&?0 (:& *)&..
58* %,. 5AA&5)58-& .%5?? 5?'5=. >& A)&.&8+5>?&;
S6 G8 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ &8+&) 5AA&5)58-& 5-+7 A?&5*7 () A)5-+,-& ,8 58= '5=
>&0()& 5 -(:)+7 +),>:85?7 () 5:+%(),+= 1&8+,(8&* ,8 .&-+,(8 CY (0 +%&
G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS" ,0 +%& .(?& () 58= 1&1>&) +%&)&(0 ,. )&?5+&* +( +%&
5*/(-5+& 5. 05+%&)7 8&A%&'7 58*7 1(+%&)7 ',0&7 *5:58*. ()
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
9/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
Q
Q6 G8 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ 5-+ () A?&5* ,8 58= 15++&) ,8 '%,-% %& %,1.&?0 %5.
.(1& A&-:8,5)= ,8+&)&.+;
3D9O 9HP7EF= )8;5?9
W:?& "" +( CC *&5? ',+% +%& *:+,&. (0 58 5*/(-5+& +( %,. -?,&8+; $%&.& ):?&. 15=
>&
&JA?5,8&* 5. 0(??('
"Y6 W:?& "" A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& ,. >(:8* +( 5--&A+ 58= >),&0 ,8 +%& -(:)+
() +),>:85? () >&0()& 58= 5:+%(),+= '%,-% %& A)(A(.&. +( A)5-+,-& 5+ 0&&
-(8.,.+&8+ ',+% %,. .+58*,8< 5+ >5) 58* 5?.( 85+:)& (0 -5.&;
""6 W:?& "# A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ ',+%*)5' 0)(1 &8&?,&/& +%5+ %& ',?? >& 5 ',+8&..;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
10/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"Y
"C6 W:?& "K A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 5+ +%& -(11&8-&1&8+ (0 %,.
&8?,= .&-+,(8 "#S (0 @8*,58 \/,*&8-& G-+;
"R6 W:?& "X A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ 5+ 58= +,1& >& 5 A5)+= +( +%&
0(1&8+,8< ?,+,
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
11/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
""
"X6 W:?& "Q 153&. ,+ -?&5) +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ 5-+ (8 +%& ,8.+):-+,(8 (0
58= A&).(8 (+%&) +%58 %,. -?,&8+ () %,. 5:+%(),Z&* 5:= () +)500,- ,8 () .+,A:?5+& 0()
() 5?& -?5,1;
#"6 W:?& ## A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ *,)&-+?= () ,8*,)&-+?= >,* 0(& ()
A:)-%5.& &,+%&) ,8 %,. ('8 851& () 58= (+%&) 851& 0() %,. ('8 >&8&0,+ ()
>&8&0,+ (0 58= (+%&) A&).(87 58= A)(A&)+= .(?* ,8 &J&-:+,(8 (0 *&-)&& ()
(+%&) A)(-&&*,8< ,8 '%,-% %& '5. A)(0&..,(85??= &8=
%,. -?,&8+ 5,?,+= *(&. 8(+ 5),.& ,8 -(:).& (0 %,. &1A?(=1&8+ 5. 58 5*/(-5+&;
#C6 W:?& #K A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ *( 58=+%,8< '%&)&>= %&
5>:.&. () +53& 5*/58+5= %,. -?,&8+;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
12/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"#
#K6 W:?& #O A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%(:?* 3&&A 58 5--(:8+ (0 -?,&8+.
1(8&= &8+):.+&* +( %,1 58* 5--(:8+. .%(:?* .%(' 51(:8+ )&-&,/&* 0)(1
+%& -?,&8+ () (8 %,. >&%5?0 +%& &JA&8.&. ,8-:))&* 0() %,1 58* +%& *&>,+.
15*& (8 5--(:8+ (0 0&&. ',+% +%& )&.A&-+,/& *5+&. 58* 5?? (+%&) 8&-&..5)=
A5)+,-:?5).;
#O6 W:?& #S A)(/,*&. +%5+ '%&)& 1(8&= 5)& )&-&,/&* 0)(1 () (8 5--(:8+ (0
-?,&8+7 +%& &8+),&. ,8 +%& 5--(:8+ .%(:?* -(8+5,8 5 )&0&)&8-& 5. +( '%&+%&)
+%& 51(:8+ %5/& >&&8 )&-&,/&* 0() 0&&. () &JA&8.&. 58* *:),8< +%& -(:).&
(0 +%& A)(-&&*,8< 8( 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 5--&A+ ',+% +%& -(8.&8+ ,8 '),+,8< (0
+%& -?,&8+ -(8-&)8&* >& 5+ ?,>&)+= +( *,/&)+ 58= A()+,(8 (0 +%& &JA&8.&.
+('5)*. 0&&;
#S6 W:?& #R A)(/,*&. +%5+ '%&)& 58= 51(:8+ ,. )&-&,/&* () &%5?0 (0 %,. -?,&8+7 +%& 05-+ (0 .:-% )&-&,A+ 1:.+ >& ,8+,15+&* +( +%& -?,&8+
5. &5)?= 5. A(..,>?&; @0 +%& -?,&8+ *&158*. +%& A5=1&8+ (0 .:-% 1(8&= 58*
,8 .A,+& (0 .:-% *&158* +%& 5*/(-5+& *(&. 8(+ A5= %,17 %& ',?? >&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
13/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"C
#R6 W:?& #X A)(/,*&. +%5+ 50+&) +&)1,85+,(8 (0 +%& A)(-&&*,8< +%& 5*/(-5+&
.%5?? >& 5+ ?,>&)+= +( 5AA)(A),5+& +('5)*. +%& .&++?& 0&& *:& +( %,1 58= .:1
)&15,8,8< :8&JA58*&* (:+ (0 +%& 51(:8+ A5,* () .&8* +( %,1 0() &JA&8.&.
() 58= 51(:8+ +%5+ %5. -(1& ,8+( %,. %58*. ,8 +%5+ A)(-&&*,8&&8 ?&0+ :8.&++?&* +%& 5*/(-5+& -58
*&*:-+ (:+ (0 58= 1(8&= (0 +%& -?,&8+ )&15,8,8< ,8 %,. %58* 5+ +%& +&)1,85+,(8
(0 +%& A)(-&&*,8< 0() '%,-% %& %5* >&&8 &8,+. 58 5*/(-5+& +( ?&8* 1(8&= +( %,. -?,&8+ 0() +%& A:)A(.&
(0 58= 5-+,(8 0() ?&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
14/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"K
A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ ?&8* 1(8&= +( %,. -?,&8+ 0(& +%&
A:)A(.& (0 58= 5-+,(8 () ?&= +%& D5) -(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 -(8+5,8 A)(/,.,(8. 5. +( +%&
*:+,&.
(0 58 5*/(-5+& +( +%& (AA(8&8+;
W:?& CK A)(/,*&. +%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? 8(+ ,8 58= '5= -(11:8,-5+& ()
8&E&-+ 15++&) (0 -(8+)(/&).= ',+% 58= A5)+= )&A)&.&8+&* >= 58
5*/(-5+&
&J-&A+ +%)(:&.+ +( -5))= (:+ 5?? ?&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
15/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"O
15*& +( +%& (AA(.,+& A5)+= &/&8 +%(:= +%& .+5+& >5) -(:8-,? .%5?? >& -)&*,+&* ,8 5 .&A5)5+& 0:8* +( >&
38('8 5. ^D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 G*/(-5+&. '&?05)& 0:8* 0() +%& H+5+&_ 58*
.%5?? >& *&A(.,+&* ,8 +%& >583 5. A)(/,*&* +%&)& :8*&); G--()*,8< +( ):?& K"4#6
+%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 G*/(-5+&. `&?05)& 0:8* M(11,++&& 0() +%& H+5+&
.%5?? )&1,+ #Ya (0 +%& +(+5? 51(:8+ -(??&-+&* 58* -)&*,+&* +( ,+. 5--(:8+7 +(
+%&
>5) -(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 >= +%& &8* (0 &/&)= 1(8+% '%,-% .%5?? >& -)&*,+&* >= +%&
D5) -(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 58* +%& D5) -(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 .%5?? *&A(.,+ +%& .5,* 51(:8+
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
16/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"S
,8 5 .&A5)5+& 0:8* +( >& 38('8 5. ^D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 G*/(-5+&. `&?05)&
0:8*;_
G--()*,8< +( ):?& K"4C6 +%& )&.+ XYa (0 +%& +(+5? .:1 .( -(??&-+&* >= +%& D5)
M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 G*/(-5+& `&?05)& L:8* M(11,++&& 0() +%& .+5+& .%5?? >&
:+,?,Z&* 0() +%& '&?05)& (0 +%& 5*/(-5+&. ,8 )&.A&-+ (0 '&?05)& .-%&1&.
.A(8.()&* >= +%& )&.A&-+,/& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?;
W:?& K# *&5?. ',+% +%& -(8.&I:&8-&. (0 8(8 A5=1&8+ (0 +%& .5,* 51(:8+ >=
+%&
5*/(-5+&; @+ A)(/,*&. +%5+ ,0 58 5*/(-5+& 05,?. +( A5= +%& 50()&.5,* .:1 ',+%,8
+%& A)&.-),>&* +,1&7 +%& .&-)&+5)= (0 +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? .%5?? ,..:& +( %,1 5
8(+,-& +( .%(' -5:.& ',+%,8 5 1(8+% '%= %,. ),& 8(+
.:.A&8*&*; @8 -5.& +%& 5*/(-5+& A5=. +%& 51(:8+ +(& *)(AA&*; @0 +%& 5*/(-5+&
*(&. 8(+ A5= +%& 51(:8+ () 05,?. +( .%(' .:00,-,&8+ -5:.&7 5 -(11,++&& (0
+%)&&
1&1>&). -(8.+,+:+&* >= +%& .+5+& >5) -(:8-,? ,8 +%,. >&%5?0 15= A5.. 58 ()*&)
.:.A&8*,8< +%& ),
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
17/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"R
>:.,8&.. () 58= 5/(-5+,(8 ,8-(8.,.+&8+ ',+% %,. A)5-+,-,8< 5. 58 5*/(-5+& ()
%5. ,8-:))&* 58= *,.I:5?,0,-5+,(8 1&8+,(8&* ,8 +%& G*/(-5+&. G-+ () +%& ):?&.
15*& +%&)& :8*&)7 .%5?? .&8* 5 *&-?5)5+,(8 +( +%& &00&-+ +( +%& )&.A&-+,/& .+5+&
>5) -(:8-,? ,8 '%,-% +%& 5*/(-5+& ,. &8)(??&*7 ',+%,8 QY *5=. 0)(1 +%& *5+& (0
.:-% *,.I:5?,0,-5+,(8;
W:?& KK A)(/,*&.7 58 5AA&5? .%5?? ?,& +( +%& >5) -(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 5+ +%& ,8.+58-&
(0 58 5 153&. ,+
-?&5) +%5+ +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 .%5?? :+,?,.& +%& 0:8*. )&-&,/&* :8*&) ):?&
K"4#67 .+5+&* 5>(/&7 ,8 5--()*58-& ',+% +%& .-%&1& '%,-% 15= >& 0)51&* 0)(1
+,1& +( +,1&;
#6 V:+= ,8 ,1A5)+,8< +)5,8,8< b ):?& KO 0)51&* >= +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5
153&. ,+ -?&5) +%5+ ,+ ,. ,1A)(A&) 0() 58 5*/(-5+& +( *&158* () 5--&A+ 0&&. ()
58= A)&1,:1 0)(1 58= A&).(8 5. 5 -(8.,*&)5+,(8 0() ,1A5)+,8< +)5,8,8< ,8 ?5'
:8*&) +%& ):?&. A)&.-),>&* >= +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? +( &85>?& .:-% A&).(8 +(
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
18/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"X
I:5?,0= 0() &8)(?1&8+ :8*&) +%& G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS"
C6 V:+= +( )&8*&) ?&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
19/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
"Q
A)5-+,-& 58* .%5?? +53,8< :A 58= .:-% &1A?(=1&8+ ,8+,15+& +%& 05-+ +( +%& >5)
-(:8-,? (8 '%(.& )(?? %,. 851& 5AA&5). 58* .%5?? +%&)&:A(8 -&5.& +( A)5-+,-&
5. 58 5*/(-5+& .( ?(8< 5. %& -(8+,8:&. ,8 .:-% &1A?(=1&8+; W:?& OY A)(/,*&.
+%5+ 58 5*/(-5+& '%( %5. ,8%&),+&* () .:--&&*&* >= .:)/,/().%,A7 +( 5 051,?=
>:.,8&.. 15= -(8+,8:& ,+7 >:+ 15= 8(+ A&).(85??= A5)+,-,A5+& ,8 +%&
1585
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
20/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#Y
The Mayors Courts, established in the three presidency towns,
were Crown Courts with right of appeal first to the Governor-in-
Council and a right of second appeal to the Privy Council. In 1791,
Judges felt the need of experience, and thus the role of an attorney
to protect the rights of his client was upheld in each of the Mayors
Courts. This was done in spite of opposition from Council members
or the Governor. A second principle was also established during the
period of the Mayors Courts. This was the right to dismiss an
attorney guilty of misconduct. The first example of dismissal was
recorded by the Mayors Court at Madras which dismissed attorney
Jones.
The Supreme Court of Judicature was established by a Royal
Charter in 1774. The Supreme Court was established as there was
dissatisfaction with the weaknesses of the Court of the
Mayor. Similar Supreme Courts were established in Madras in 1801
and Bombay in 1823. The first barristers appeared in India after the
opening of the Supreme Court in Calcutta in 1774. As barristers
began to come into the Courts on work as advocates, the attorneys
gave up pleading and worked as solicitors. The two grades of legal
practice gradually became distinct and separate as they were in
England. Madras gained its first barrister in 1778 with Mr. Benjamin
Sullivan.
Thus, the establishment of the Supreme Court brought recognition,
wealth and prestige to the legal profession. The charters of the
Court stipulated that the Chief Justice and three puisne Judges be
English barristers of at least 5 years standing.
The charters empowered the Court to approve, admit and enrol
advocates and attorneys to plead and act on behalf of suitors. They
also gave the Court the authority to remove lawyers from the roll of
the Court on reasonable cause and to prohibit practitioners not
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
21/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#"
properly admitted and enrolled from practising in the Court. The
Court maintained the right to admit, discipline and dismiss
attorneys and barristers. Attorneys were not admitted without
recommendation from a high official in England or a Judge in
India. Permission to practice in Court could be refused even to a
barrister.
In contrast to the Courts in the presidency towns, the legal
profession in the mofussil towns was established, guided and
controlled by legislation. In the Diwani Courts, legal practice was
neither recognized nor controlled, and practice was carried on by
vakils and agents. Vakils had even been appearing in the Courts of
the Nawabs and there were no laws concerning their qualification,
relationship to the Court, mode of procedure of ethics or
practice. There were two kinds of agents a. untrained relatives or
servants of the parties in Court and b. professional pleaders who
had training in either Hindu or Muslim law. Bengal Regulation VII of
1793 was enacted as it was felt that in order to administer justice,
Courts, must have pleading of causes administered by a distinct
profession Only men of character and education, well versed in the
Mohamedan or Hindu law and in the Regulations passed by the
British Government, would be admitted to plead in the Courts. They
should be subjected to rules and restrictions in order to discharge
their work diligently and faithfully by upholding the clients trust.Establishment of the High Courts
In 1862, the High Courts started by the Crown were established at
Calcutta, Bombay and Madras. The High Court Bench was designed
to combine Supreme Court and Sudder Court traditions. This was
done to unite the legal learning and judicial experience of the
English barristers with the intimate experience of civil servants in
matters of Indian customs, usages and laws possessed by the civil
servants. Each of the High Courts was given the power to make
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
22/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
##
rules for the qualifications of proper persons, advocates, vakils and
attorneys at Bar. The admission of vakils to practice before the
High Courts ended the monopoly that the barristers had enjoyed in
the Supreme Courts. It greatly extended the practice and prestige of
the Indian laws by giving them opportunities and privileges equal to
those enjoyed for many years by the English lawyers. The learning
of the best British traditions of Indian vakils began in a guru-shishya
tradition:
Men like Sir V. Bashyam Ayyangar, Sir T. Muthuswamy Ayyar and
Sir S. Subramania Ayyar were quick to learn and absorb the
traditions of the English Bar from their English friends and
colleagues in the Madras Bar and they in turn as the originators of a
long line of disciples in the Bar passed on those traditions to the
disciples who continued to do the good work.
Additional High Courts were established in Allahabad (1886), Patna
(1916), and Lahore (1919).
There were six grades of legal practice in India after the founding of
the High Courts a) Advocates, b) Attorneys (Solicitors), c) Vakils of
High Courts, d) Pleaders, e) Mukhtars, f) Revenue Agents. The Legal
Practitioners Act of 1879 in fact brought all the six grades of the
profession into one system under the jurisdiction of the High
Courts. The Legal Practitioners Act and the Letters Patent of the
High Courts formed the chief legislative governance of legalpractitioners in the subordinate Courts in the country until the
Advocates Act, 1961 was enacted.
In order to be a vakil, the candidate had to study at a college or
university, master the use of English and pass a vakils
examination. By 1940, a vakil was required to be a graduate with
an LL.B. from a university in India in addition to three other certified
requirements. The certificate should be proof that a. he had passed
in the examination b. read in the chamber of a qualified lawyer and
was of a good character. In fact, Sir Sunder Lal, Jogendra Nath
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
23/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#C
Chaudhary, Ram Prasad and Moti Lal Nehru were all vakils who
were raised to the rank of an Advocate.
Original and appellate jurisdiction of the High Court.
The High Courts of the three presidency towns had an original
side. The original side included major civil and criminal matters
which had been earlier heard by predecessor Supreme Courts. On
the original side in the High Courts, the solicitor and barrister
remained distinct i.e. attorney and advocate. On the appellate side
every lawyer practiced as his own attorney.
However, in Madras the vakils started practice since 1866. In 1874,
the barristers challenged their right to do original side work.
However, in 1916, this right was firmly established in favour of the
vakils. Similarly, vakils in Bombay and Calcutta could be promoted
as advocates and become qualified to work on the original side. By
attending the appellate side and original side Courts each for one
year, a vakil of 10 years service in the Court was permitted to sit for
the advocatesexamination.
Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926.
The Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 was passed to unify the various
grades of legal practice and to provide self-government to the Bars
attached to various Courts. The Act required that each High Courtmust constitute a Bar Council made up of the Advocate General,
four men nominated by the High Court of whom two should be
Judges and ten elected from among the advocates of the Bar. The
duties of the Bar Council were to decide all matters concerning
legal education, qualification for enrolment, discipline and control of
the profession. It was favourable to the advocates as it gave them
authority previously held by the judiciary to regulate the
membership and discipline of their profession.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
24/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#K
The Advocates Act, 1961 was a step to further this very
initiative. As a result of the Advocates Act, admission, practice,
ethics, privileges, regulations, discipline and improvement of the
profession as well as law reform are now significantly in the hands
of the profession itself.
FWcL\HH@cdG9 \$]@MH e DGWUD\dM] W\9G$@cdH
$cF@M b G*1,..,(87 \8)(?1&8+ e W,&,8< 5*1,++&* 5. 5*/(-5+&. (8 +%& H+5+& )(??; $%& A&).(8. 5AA?=,8< 0() .:-% 5*1,..,(8
%5. +( 0:?0,? -&)+5,8 -(8*,+,(8. >),&0&* >&?('B
56 M,+,Z&8 (0 @8*,5 b H&- #K4"6456 (0 +%& G-+ A)(/,*&. +%5+ +%& A&).(8 -(8-&)8&* .%(:?*
>& 5 -,+,Z&8 (0 @8*,5; \/&8 +%& 85+,(85?. (0 (+%&) -(:8+)= 5)& A&)1,++&* +( A)5-+,-&
?5' ,8 (:) -(:8+)= 58* 15= >& 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 5 H+5+& )(??f ,0 -,+,Z&8. (0
@8*,57 *:?= I:5?,0,&*7 5)& A&)1,++&* +( A)5-+,-& ?5' ,8 +%5+ (+%&) -(:8+)=; $%& A&).(8
*&.,),8< +( A)5-+,-& ?5' ,8 @8*,5 5. .:-% %5. +( 0:?0,? +%& (+%&) -(8*,+,(8. 5. '&?? 5.
%5/& >&&8 ?5,* *('8 ,8 G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS";
>6 G&0()& +%& "#+% *5= (0 g5)-%7 "QSR7 0)(1 58= N8,/&).,+= ,8
+%& +&)),+()= (0 @8*,5f ()
4,,6 >&0()& +%& "O+% G:
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
25/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#O
4,,,6 50+&) +%& "#+% *5= (0 g5)-%7 "QSR7 .5/& 5. A)(/,*&* ,8 .:>U-?5:.& 4,,,567 50+&)
:8*&)&0()& +%& C".+ *5= (0 V&-&1>&)7 "QRS () %5. A5..&* +%&
5)+,-?& -?&)3. &J51,85+,(8 () 58= (+%&) &J51,85+,(8 .A&-,0,&* >= +%& ],5= () M5?-:++5 0() &8)(?1&8+ 5. 58 5++()8&= (0 +%5+ ],+5,8&*
.:-% (+%&) 0()&,
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
26/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#S
]:8*)&* c8?=6 A5=5>?& +( +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? 58* W.; "OYhU 4W:A&&. c8&
]:8*)&* L,0+= c8?=6 +( +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,57 >= '5= (0 5 >583 *)50+ *)5'8 ,8
05/(:) (0 +%5+ M(:8-,?B
F)(/,*&* +%5+ '%&)& .:-% A&).(8 ,. 5 1&1>&) (0 +%& H-%&*:?& M5.+&. () +%&
H-%&*:?& $),>&. 58* A)(*:-&. 5 -&)+,0,-5+& +( +%5+ &00&-+ 0)(1 .:-% 5:+%(),+= 5. 15=
>& A)&.-),>&*7 +%& &8)(?1&8+ 0&& A5=5>?& >= %,1 +( +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? .%5?? >&
W.;"YYhU 4W:A&&. c8& ]:8*)&* c8?=6 58* W.; #OhU 4W:A&&. $'&8+= L,/& c8?=6 +(
+%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5;
$%& D5) M(:8-,? 15= A)&.-),>& +%& I:5?,0,-5+,(8. 0() +%& A:)A(.& (0 5*1,..,(8 5. 58
5*/(-5+& (8 5 H+5+& )(?? ,8 5**,+,(8 +( I:5?,0,-5+,(8. A)(/,*&* :8*&) H&-+,(8 #K4"64-6 >:+ ,+
'(:?* 8(+ 1&58 +%5+ .:-% I:5?,0,-5+,(8 '(:?* (/&; $%& G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS" &JA)&..?= 5:+%(),.&. +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 +( 5** .:-%
(+%&) -(8*,+,(8. >= 153,8< 5AA)(A),5+& ):?&.;
$%& A)(/,.,(8. (0 H&-+,(8 #K4"6406 (0 +%& G-+ 0,J&. &8)(?1&8+ 0&& '%,-% ,. 8(+
:8-(8.+,+:+,(85?; $%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 ,. &8+,+?&* +( -%5)
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
27/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#R
5*/(-5+& .%5?? >& 15*& +( +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? ',+%,8 '%(.& E:),.*,-+,(8 +%& 5AA?,-58+
',.%&. +( A)5-+,-&;
W&0&)&8-& (0 5AA?,-5+,(8 +( \8)(?1&8+ M(11,++&&B H&- #S4"6 (0 +%& .5,* G-+ -(8+5,8.
+%& A)(/,.,(8 +%5+ 5 H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? .%5?? )&0&) &/&)= 5AA?,-5+,(8 0() 5*1,..,(8 5. 58
5*/(-5+& +( ,+. &8)(?1&8+ -(11,++&&7 58* .:>E&-+ +( +%& A)(/,.,(8. (0 .:>U.&-+,(8. 4#6 58*
4C6 58* +( 58= *,)&-+,(8 +%5+ 15= >& = 0)5:* () :8*:& ,80?:&8-&7 )&1(/& +%&
851& (0 .:-% A&).(8 0)(1 +%& )(?? (0 5*/(-5+&. 50+&) &,8& 5--(1A58,&* >= 5 .+5+&1&8+ (0 +%&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
28/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#X
M(:8-,? %5. )&0:.&* 58= 5AA?,-5+,(8 0() 5*1,..,(8 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 ,+. )(??7 +%& H+5+& D5)
M(:8-,? .%5??7 5. .((8 5. 15= >&7 .&8* ,8+,15+,(8 +( 5?? (+%&) H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?. 5>(:+
.:-% )&0:.5? .+5+,8< +%& 851&7 5**)&.. 58* I:5?,0,-5+,(8. (0 +%& A&).(8 '%(.& 5AA?,-5+,(8
'5. )&0:.&* 58* +%& &,8< &8)(??&* 5.
58 5*/(-5+& 5. >&?(' b
456 $%& A&).(8 -(8-&)8&* .%(:?* 8(+ >& -(8/,-+&* (0 58 (00&8-& ,8/(?/,8< 1()5?
+:)A,+:*&f
4>6 $%& A&).(8 -(8-&)8&* .%(:?* 8(+ >& -(8/,-+&* (0 58 (00&8-& :8*&) +%&
A)(/,.,(8. (0 +%& N8+(:-%5>,?,+= 4c00&8-&.6 G-+7 "QOO 4## (0 "QOO6f
4-6 $%& A&).(8 -(8-&)8&* .%(:?* 8(+ >& *,.1,..&* () )&1(/&* 0)(1 &1A?(=1&8+ ()
(00,-& :8*&) +%& H+5+& (8 58= -%5)&7
)&1(/5?;
$%& ?&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
29/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
#Q
],& &8)(??&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& %5. +%& -(8.&I:&8-& (0 .:>.+58-&7
A)&.-),>,8< *,.I:5?,0,-5+,(8; $%& A)&.-),A+,(8 (0 58 :AA&) 5?& 0() +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 +( .:A&),1A(.& 5 0:)+%&)
I:5?,0,-5+,(8 >= A:++,8< 58 :AA&) 5
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
30/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CY
@+ %5. >&&8 %&?* >= +%& ](8[>?& H:A)&1& M(:)+ (0 @8*,5 ,8 -5.& )&A()+&* ,8 "QRC7 +%5+ N++5)
F)5*&.% H+5+& 9&= +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? (0 N++5)
F)5*&.%;
M?5..&. (0 G*/(-5+&.B G. A&) +%& H&- "S4"6 (0 +%& G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS"7 +%&)& 5)& +'(
-?5..&. (0 5*/(-5+&.7 851&?= H&8,() G*/(-5+&. 58* c+%&) G*/(-5+&.; H&- "S4#6 .+5+&.
+%5+7 ,0 +%& H:A)&1& M(:)+ () 5 ],,?,+=7 .+58*,8< 5+ +%& D5) () .A&-,5? 38('?&*&0()& +%& M(:)+ () $),>:85? () >&0()&
58= A&).(8 () 5:+%(),+= 1&8+,(8&* ,8 H&-+,(8 CY (0 +%& .5,* G-+; ]& -58 5AA&5) (8?=
+%)(:
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
31/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
C"
-58 %& :8*&)+53& -(8/&=58-& '()3 (0 58= 3,8*;
j G .&8,() 5*/(-5+& ,. 0)&& +( 153& -(8-&..,(8. () ),&0 ,8.+):-+,(8.
0() +%& A:)A(.& (0 5AA&5),8< >&0()& 58= M(:)+ () $),>:85? () >&0()& 58= A&).(8 ()
(+%&) 5:+%(),+= ,8 @8*,5;
j $%& 5*/(-5+& '%( %5. 5-+&* 5. 5 E:8,() 5*/(-5+& ,8 5 &-(1,8< 5 .&8,() 5*/(-5+& 5*/,.&. (8 &0()& +%& "O+% *5= (0 G:
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
32/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
C#
+,1& &JA)&.. 58 ,8+&8+,(8 ,8 +%& A)&.-),>&* 1588&) +( A)5-+,.& ',+%,8 +%& E:),.*,-+,(8 (0 +%&
D5) M(:8-,?f
4>6 5?? (+%&) A&).(8. '%( 5)& 5*1,++&* +( >& 5*/(-5+&. (8 +%& )(?? (0 +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?
:8*&) +%,. G-+ (8 () 50+&) +%& 5AA(,8+&* *5=;
G--()*,8< +( H&- "R4#6 (0 +%& .5,* G-+7 +%,. )(?? (0 5*/(-5+&. ,. *,/,*&* ,8+( # A5)+.; $%&
0,).+ A5)+ ,. 1&58+ 0() +%& 851&. (0 .&8,() 5*/(-5+&. 58* +%& .&-(8* A5)+ ,. 1&58+ 0() +%&
851&. (0 (+%&) 5*/(-5+&.;
G--()*,8< +( H&- "R4K6 (0 +%& .5,* G-+ .A&-,0,-5??= A)(/,*&. +%5+ 8( A&).(8 .%5?? >&
&8)(??&* 5. 5*/(-5+& (8 +%& )(?? (0 1()& +%58 (8& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?.;
$%& ):?&. 5. )&&?(' b
" 456 $%& M(:8-,? 15=7 0)(1 +,1& +( +,1&7 & 8(+&* ,8 +%& .5,* )(??.;
C H5/& 5. (+%&)',.& *,)&-+&* >= +%& M(:8-,?f 8( (+%&) A5)+,-:?5). .%5?? >& &8+&)&* ,8
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
33/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CC
+%& .5,* )(??.;
K \/&)= A5&5) +%& .,= +%& H+5+& M(:8-,?;
O G:+%&8+,-5+&* -(A,&. (0 58= 5**,+,(8. () 5?+&)5+,(8. 15*& ,8 +%& )(?? .%5?? >& .&8+ +(
+%& M(:8-,? ',+%(:+ *&?5=;
$)58.0&) (0 d51& 0)(1 c8& H+5+& W(?? +( 58(+%&) H+5+& W(??B G--()*,8< +( H&- "X4"6 (0
G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS"7 '%&)& +%& 851& (0 58= A&).(8 '%(.& 851& ,. &8+&)&* 5. 58
5*/(-5+& (8 +%& )(?? (0 58= H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? 15= 153& 58 5AA?,-5+,(8 ,8 +%& A)&.-),>&*
0()1 +( +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 0() +%& +)58.0&) (0 %,. 851& 0)(1 +%& )(?? (0 +%5+ H+5+& D5)
M(:8-,? +( +%& )(?? (0 58= (+%&) H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? 58*7 (8 )&-&,A+ (0 58= .:-% 5AA?,-5+,(8
+%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 .%5?? *,)&-+ +%5+ +%& 851& (0 .:-% A&).(8 .%5?? ',+%(:+ +%&
A5=1&8+ (0 58= 0&&7 >& )&1(/&* 0)(1 +%& )(?? (0 +%& 0,).+ 1&8+,(8&* H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? 58*
&8+&)&* ,8 +%& )(?? (0 +%& (+%&) H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? 58* +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?. -(8-&)8&*
.%5?? -(1A?= ',+% .:-% *,)&-+,(8;
F)(/,*&* +%5+ '%&)& 58= .:-% 5AA?,-5+,(8 0() +)58.0&) ,. 15*& >= 5 A&).(8 5
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
34/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CK
?5++&) )(?? +( '%,-% %& '5. &8+,+?&* ,8 +%& 0()1&) )(??; @+ ,. +( >& 8(+&* +%5+ +%& 5*/(-5+&
5AA?=,8< %5. 8(+ +( A5= +%& 0&& (0 58= 3,8* 0() +)58.0&)),8< (0 %,. 851& 0)(1 (8& H+5+& )(??
+( 58(+%&) H+5+& )(??;
$%& ?58& &8+&)&* ,8 +%& )(?? (0 +%5+
H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?7 58* +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? -(8-&)8&* .%5?? -(1A?= ',+% .:-% *,)&-+,(8;
G--()*,8< +( H&- #Y4#6 (0 +%& .5,* G-+7 58= &8+)= ,8 +%& H+5+& )(?? 15*& ,8 -(1A?,58-& ',+%
+%& *,)&-+,(8 (0 +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 ,. +( >& 15*& ,8 ()*&) (0 .&8,(),+=; @0 58 5*/(-5+&
5. ,. )&0&))&* +( ,8 H&- #Y (0 +%& G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS"7 (1,+. () 05,?. +( &JA)&.. %,.
,8+&8+,(8 ',+%,8 +%& A)&.-),>&* +,1&7 %,.h%&) 851& .%5?? >& &8+&)&* ,8 +%& )(?? (0 +%& H+5+&
D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5;
G*/(-5+&. (8?= )&-(
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
35/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CO
H&- #Q (0 +%& G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS"7 ?5=. *('8 +%5+ ^.:>E&-+ +( +%& A)(/,.,(8. (0 +%,. G-+
58* 58= ):?&. 15*& +%&)& :8*&)7 +%&)& .%5??7 5. 0)(1 +%& 5AA(,8+&* *5=7 >& (8?= (8& -?5..
(0 A&).(8.7 &8+,+?&* +( A)5-+,-& +%& A)(0&..,(8 ?5'7 851&?= 5*/(-5+&.;
W,&0()& 58= +),>:85? () A&).(8 ?&&0()& 58= 5:+%(),+= () A&).(8 >&0()& '%(1 .:-% 5*/(-5+& ,. >= () :8*&) 58=
?5' 0() +%& +,1& >&,8< ,8 0()-& &8+,+?&* +( A)5-+,.&;
GAA&5)58-& (0 d(8UG*/(-5+&B N8*&) H&- C# (0 +%& G*/(-5+&. G-+7 "QS" 5 *,.-)&+,(85)=
A('&) ,.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
36/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CS
(>?,&0()& '%(1 .:-% 5*/(-5+& ,. >= () :8*&)
58= ?5' 0() +%& +,1& >&,8< &8+,+?&* +( A)5-+,-&; $%&)&0()&7 +%& ),& A&)1,++&*
+( 5)5.,. (0 5++()8&= :8?&..
A&)1,++&* :8*&) .A&-,5? -,)-:1.+58-&. >= +%& M(:)+;
F('&) (0 M(:)+ +( A&)1,+ 5AA&5)58-& (0 58 ,8*,/,*:5?B G. )&&0()& +%& M(:)+ ,8 5
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
37/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CR
5*/(-5+& +( A)5-+,.& +%& A)(0&..,(8 (0 ?5' >&0()& 5?? M(:)+.7 $),>:85?.7 5:+%(),+,&. &+-; $%&
),&,8< ,8 0()-&7 8( A&).(8 .%5?? (8 () 50+&) +%& 5AA(,8+&* *5=7 >& &8+,+?&* +(
A)5-+,.& ,8 58= M(:)+ () >&0()& 58= 5:+%(),+= () A&).(8 :8?&.. %&h.%& ,. &8)(??&* 5. 58
5*/(-5+& :8*&) +%& .5,* G-+_;
G )&-(
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
38/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CX
&&8 ,+,(8 ,. +(
A)5-+,.& 5. 5 A)(0&..,(8 58* 8(+ 0() 1&)& 5AA&5)58-& ,8 58 ,.(?5+&* -5.&;
$%& ),& A&)1,++&* +( A)5-+,.& ,8 +%& ],()*,85+& +%&)&+(;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
39/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
CQ
G8 $FGH
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
40/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KY
$FGH&* 0&& ',+% 9:5 *9795 .7E )HD?
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
41/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
K"
\5-% H+5+& %5. 5 .7E )HD?
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
42/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
K#
';6: )HDE9 4,8 -5.& (0 58 $FGH&0()& +%5+ ';6: )HDE96 () >= +%& *DQE5T5
)HDE94,8 -5.& (0 +%& $FGH&0()& +%& *DQE5T5 )HDE96; `%,?& +%& -(80&))5? (0
*5?;HE $FGH&)7 "QSO7 +( +%& D5) M(:8-,? 15,8+5,8,8< +%& )(?? ,8 '%,-% %,. 851& %5. >&&8
&8+&)&* +%5+ %& *(&. 8(+ *&.,)& +( -(8+,8:& 5. 5 .&8,() 5*/(-5+&7 +%& D5) M(:8-,? 15= & 5?+&)&* 5--()*,8
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
43/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KC
IU *DS=U .O $&0()&
+%& "O+%
*5= (0 G:6G?? (+%&) A&).(8. '%( 5)& 5*1,++&* +( >& 5*/(-5+&. (8 +%& )(?? (0 +%&
H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? :8*&) +%,. G-+ (8 () 50+&) +%& 5AA(,8+&* *5=;
I`4[ \5-% .:-% )(?? (0 5*/(-5+&. .%5?? -(8.,.+ (0 +'( A5)+.7 +%& 0,).+ A5)+ -(8+5,8,8< +%&
851&. (0 .&8,() 5*/(-5+&. 58* +%& .&-(8* A5)+7 +%& 851&. (0 (+%&) 5*/(-5+&.;
I`4\\8+),&. ,8 &5-% A5)+ (0 +%& )(?? (0 5*/(-5+&. A)&A5)&* 58* 15,8+5,8&* >= 5 H+5+& D5)
M(:8-,? :8*&) +%,. .&-+,(8 .%5?? >& ,8 +%& ()*&) (0 .&8,(),+=7 [n58*7 .:>E&-+ +( 58= ):?& +%5+
15= >& 15*& >= +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 ,8 +%,. >&%5?07 .:-% .&8,(),+= .%5?? >& *&+&)1,8&*6
5. 0(??('.B U
456 $%& .&8,(),+= (0 58 5*/(-5+& )&0&))&* +( ,8 -?5:.& 456 .:>U.&-+,(8 4"6 .%5??
>& *&+&)1,8&* ,8 5--()*58-& ',+% %,. *5+& (0 &8)(??1&8+ :8*&) +%&
@8*,58 D5) M(:8-,? G-+7 "Q#S 4CX (0 "Q#S6f
4>6$%& .&8,(),+= (0 58= A&).(8 '%( '5. 5 .&8,() 5*/(-5+& (0 +%& H:A)&1&
M(:)+ ,11&*,5+&?= >&0()&7 +%& 5AA(,8+&* *5= .%5??7 0() +%& A:)A(.&. (0
+%& 0,).+ A5)+ (0 +%& H+5+& )(??7 >& *&+&)1,8&* ,8 5--()*58-& ',+% .:-%
A),8-,A?&. 5. +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 15= .A&-,0=f
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
44/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KK
\n4-6 pppo
4-6 $%& .&8,(),+= (0 58= (+%&) A&).(8 '%(7 (8 () 50+&) +%& 5AA(,8+&* *5=7 ,.
&8)(??&* 5. 5 .&8,() 5*/(-5+& () ,. 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? >&
*&+&)1,8&* >= +%& *5+& (0 .:-% &8)(?1&8+ () 5*1,..,(87 5. +%& -5.& 15=
>&;
4*6
L
n4&6 d(+',+%.+58*,8< 58=+%,8< -(8+5,8&* ,8 -?5:.& 4567 +%& .&8,(),+= (0 585++()8&= &8)(??&* n'%&+%&) >&0()& () 50+&) +%& -(11&8-&1&8+ (0 +%&
G*/(-5+&. 4G1&8*1&8+6 G-+7 "QXYo 5. 58 5*/(-5+& .%5?? >& *&+&)1,8&*
,8 5--()*58-& ',+% +%& *5+& (0 %,. &8)(?1&8+ 5. 58 5++()8&=o
I`4L d( A&).(8 .%5?? >& &8)(??&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 +%& )(?? (0 1()& +%58 (8& H+5+& D5)
M(:8-,?;
IU *DS=U .O $
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
45/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KO
M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 +%5+ +%& 5AA?,-5+,(8 0() +)58.0&) %5. 8(+ >&&8; g5*& >(85 0,*& 58* +%5+ +%&
+)58.0&) .%(:?* 8(+ >& 15*&7 +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 15=7 50+&) &%5?07 )&E&-+ +%&
5AA?,-5+,(8;o
Ia4[L() +%& )&1(/5? (0 *(:>+. ,+ ,. %&)&>= *&-?5)&* +%5+ '%&)& (8 58 5AA?,-5+,(8 15*& >=
58 5*/(-5+& :8*&) .:>U.&-+,(8 4"67 %,. 851& ,. +)58.0&))&* 0)(1 +%& )(?? (0 (8& H+5+& D5)M(:8-,? +( +%5+ (0 58(+%&)7 %& .%5?? )&+5,8 +%& .51& .&8,(),+= ,8 +%& ?5++&) )(?? +( '%,-% %&
'5. &8+,+?&* ,8 +%& 0()1&) )(??;
IU (?=U .O $U.&-+,(8 4C6 (0 H&-+,(8 "R;
[]4\`%&)& 58 5*/(-5+& )&0&))&* +( ,8 .:>U.&-+,(8 4"6 (1,+. () 05,?. +( &JA)&.. %,. ,8+&8+,(8 ',+%,8
+%& A)&.-),>&* +,1&7 %,. 851& .%5?? >& &8+&)&* ,8 +%& )(?? (0 +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? (0 V&?%,;o
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
46/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KS
IU *DS=U .O $& )&0&))&* +( +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? -(8-&)8&* 0() *&-,.,(8;o
IU *DS=U .O $= +%& H+5+& D5)
M(:8-,? (0 &/&)= A&).(8 '%(.& 851& ,. &8+&)&* ,8 +%& )(?? (0 5*/(-5+&. 15,8+5,8&* >= ,+ :8*&) +%,.
G-+;
[[4[ \/&)= A&).(8 '%(.& 851& ,. .( &8+&)&* ,8 +%& H+5+& )(?? .%5?? 8(+,0= 58= -%58
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
47/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KR
[\4LH:>E&-+ +( +%& A)(/,.,(8. (0 .:>U.&-+,(8 4"67In4#67 4C6 58* 4CG6o +%& $FGH= +%&,) )&.A&-+,/& .&8,(),+=;
[\4bH:>E&-+ 5. 50()&.5,*U
M;N H&8,() 5*/(-5+&. .%5?? %5/& A)&U5:*,&8-& (/&) (+%&) 5*/(-5+&.f 58*
M;;N
$%& ),& *&+&)1,8&* >= +%&,) )&.A&-+,/& .&8,(),+=;
IU (?=U .O $& 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 5 H+5+& )(??7 ,0 %& 0:?0,??. +%& 0(??(',8< -(8*,+,(8.7
851&?=B U
[L4I M7N ]& ,. 5 -,+,Z&8 (0 @8*,5B
F)(/,*&* +%5+ .:>E&-+ +( +%& (+%&) A)(/,.,(8. -(8+5,8&* ,8 +%,. G-+7 5 85+,(85? (0 58= (+%&)
-(:8+)= 15= >& 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 5 H+5+& )(??7 ,0 -,+,Z&8. (0 @8*,57 *:?= I:5?,0,&*7
5)& A&)1,++&* +( A)5-+,.& ?5' ,8 +%5+ (+%&) -(:8+)=f
[L4I MSN]& %5. -(1A?&+&* +%& 5U-?5:.& 4,,,6 G0+&)
:8*&)
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
48/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KX
M;;;7NG0+&) :8*&)5)),.+&) 58* ,. -5??&* +( +%& D5) (8 () >&0()& +%& C"
.+*5= (0 V&-&1>&)7 "QRS
\n()
%5. A5..&* +%& 5)+,-?&* -?&)3.[ &J51,85+,(8 () 58= (+%&) &J51,85+,(8 .A&-,0,&* >= +%& ],5= () M5?-:++5 0() &8)(?1&8+ 5. 58 5++()8&= (0 +%5+ ],+5,8&* .:-% (+%&) 0()&,583 *)50+ *)5'8 ,8 05/(:) (0 +%5+ M(:8-,?oB
@0 '%&)& .:-% A&).(8 ,. 5 1&1>&) (0 +%& H-%&*:?&* M5.+&. () +%& H-%&*:?&* $),>&. 58*
A)(*:-&. 5 -&)+,0,-5+& +( +%& &00&-+ 0)(1 .:-% 5:+%(),+= 5. 15= >& b.-),>&*7 +%& &8)(?1&8+
0&& A5=5>?& >= %,1 +( +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? .%5?? >&K
n(8& %:8*)&* ):A&&. 58* +( +%& D5)M(:8-,? (0 @8*,57 +'&8+=U0,/& ):A&&.o;
`c"YQ87?79;H? bL() +%& A:)A(.&. (0 +%,. .:>U.&-+,(87 5 A&).(8 .%5?? >& *&&1&* +( %5/&
(>+5,8&* 5 *&= +%& N8,/&).,+= (8 ,+. 8(+,-&U>(5)* ()
(+%&)',.& *&-?5),8< %,1 +( %5/& A5..&* +%5+ &J51,85+,(8o;
[L4[d(+',+%.+58*,8< 58=+%,8< -(8+5,8&* ,8 .:>.&-+,(8 4"6an5 T53,? () 5 A?&5*&) '%( ,. 5
?5' & 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 5 H+5+& )(??7 ,0 %&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
49/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
KQ
M7Ng53&. 58 5AA?,-5+,(8 0() .:-% &8)(?1&8+ ,8 5--()*58-& ',+% +%& )&/,.,(8. (0 +%,.
G-+7 8(+ ?5+&) +%58 +'( =&5). 0)(1 +%& 5AA(,8+&*7 *5=7 58*
MSNL:?0,??. +%& -(8*,+,(8. .A&-,0,&* ,8 -?5:.&. 4567 4>6 58* 406 (0 .:>.&-+,(8 4"6
JcM\Nd(+',+%.+58*,8< 58=+%,8< -(8+5,8&* ,8 .:>.&-+,(8 4"6 5 A&).(8 '%(U
M7NI]
np p po %5.7 0() 5+ ?&5.+ +%)&& =&5).7 >&&8 5 /53,? () 5 A?&5*&) () 5 1:3%+5) ()'5. &8+,+?&* 5+ 58= +,1& +( >& &8)(??&* :8*&) 58= ?5' `np p po 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (0 5
],& &8)(??&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& :8*&) 58= ):?& 15*& >= +%& D5)
M5NM(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 ,8 +%,. >&%5?07 15= >& 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 5 H+5+& )(?? ,0
%&U
M;Ng53&. 58 5AA?,-5+,(8 0() .:-% &8)(?1&8+ ,8 5--()*58-& ',+% +%& A)(/,.,(8. (0 +%,.
G-+f 58*
M;;NL:?0,??. +%& -(8*,+,(8. .A&-,0,&* ,8 -?5:.&. 4567 4>67 4&6 58* 406 (0 .:>U.&-+,(8
I\cMLN d d de
IU (?=U .O $
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
50/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
OY
\U (?=U .O $
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
51/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
O"
[L4[$d(+%,8< -(8+5,8&* ,8 .:>U.&-+,(8 4"6 .%5?? 5AA?= +( 5 A&).(8 '%( %5/,8< >&&8 0(:8* = +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? ,8 +%,. >&%5?0o .:-%
-(11,++&& .%5?? *,.A(.& (0 +%& 5AA?,-5+,(8 ,8 +%& A)&.-),>&* 1588&)B
[nF)(/,*&* +%5+ +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 15=7 ,0 .5+,.0,&*7 &,+%&) (8 5 )&0&)&8-& 15*& +( ,+ ,8
+%,. >&%5?0 () (+%&)',.&7 +%5+ 58= A&).(8 %5. = 1,.)&A)&.&8+5+,(8 5. +( 58 &..&8+,5? 05-+ () >= 0)5:* () :8*:& ,80?:&8-&7 )&1(/& +%&
851& (0 .:-% A&).(8 0)(1 +%& )(?? (0 5*/(-5+&. 50+&) &,8&
5--(1A58,&* >= 5 .+5+&1&8+ (0 +%& U.&-+,(8 4#6 ,8 -(80()1,+= ',+% +%& (A,8,(8 (0 +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5;
[[K4L
`%&)& +%& &8)(?1&8+ -(11,++&& (0 5 H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? %5. )&0:.&* 58= 5AA?,-5+,(8 0()
5*1,..,(8 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 ,+. )(??7 +%& H+5+& D5) M(:8-,? .%5?? 5. .((8 5. 15= >&7 .&8*
,8+,15+,(8 +( 5?? (+%&) H+5+& D5) M(:8-,?. 5>(:+ .:-% )&0:.5? .+5+,8< +%& 851&7 5**)&.. 58*
I:5?,0,-5+,(8. (0 +%& A&).(8 '%(.& 5AA?,-5+,(8 '5. )&0:.&* 58* +%&
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
52/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
O#
IU (?=U .O $&&8 )&-&,/&* +( +%5+ &00&-+;6
IU *DS=U SO $& *,.A(.&* (0 >=
+%& &8)(?1&8+ -(11,++&& (0 +%& D5) M(:8-,?f
MFN$%& -(8*,+,(8. .:>E&-+ +( '%,-% 5 A&).(8 15= >& 5*1,++&* 5. 58 5*/(-5+& (8 58=
.:-% )(??B
M5N$%& ,8.+,?1&8+. ,8 '%,-% +%& &8)(?1&8+ 0&& 15= >& A5,*;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
53/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
OC
[a4\ d( ):?&. 15*& :8*&) +%,. M%5A+&) .%5?? %5/& &00&-+ :8?&.. +%& D5) M(:8-,? (0 @8*,5 %5.
5AA)(/&* +%&1;
IU +T;995F SO $
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
54/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
OK
IU +T;995F SO $& A&)1,++&* +( A)5-+,.& ,8 +%& ],()*,85+& +%&)&+(;
I\L4I$$%& ],
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
55/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
OO
158795F )7=5= g 15
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
56/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
OS
355Q7W $667EP78 Z= h5=:7G h7D=:;W 7?F +9:5E=C );G;8 $QQ578 VDE;=F;?&;;; @+ '(:?* >& 0() %,1 +( *&-,*& '%&87 +( '%(17 +( '%5+ &J+&8+
58* (8 '%5+ +&)1. 58* -(8*,+,(8. %& .%(:?* 5??(+ ):7TS5E=;
) 17G;= +%(.& 1&1>&). (0 +%& A:>?,- '%( )&I:,)& +%&,) .&)/,-&.;
@8 +%& 15++&) (0 .7SD 3;P7W7E AE7=7F B;9:78C $(1 IJ[L $88 [b\B $FGH- 0&33&-%, -.%
9%)3+34 -.)-< ?@.&%5%2 -.% 1%2,&3 9)6 /%< .&*%5%2 A+4. .% &2 ,.% +,< 3& &3% +, )/&5%
-.% $)* 3&-*+-.,-)38+34 .&* 1&*%2'#$ )38 .&* 2+0. .% &2 ,.% 9)6 /%:B ;.%2% 0)3 /% 3&
"#$% &' ()* #3$%,, -.% /#$*)2C &' -.)- 42)38 0&30%1- ?-.% D- &' E#,-+0% )2% C%1-
)$+5% )- +3,-+-#-+&3, /2%)-.+34 '2%%8&9< &1%33%,, )38 =#,-+0%: F& ,&0+%-6 0)3 %G+,-
*+-.- $)*, )38 $)*, .)5% 3& 9%)3+34< +' -.%6 0)33&- /% %3'&20%8: >- +, -.2. -.%
D-, -.)- -.% 2#$% &' $)* 2%5%)$, +-, 9%)3+34'#$ 0&3-%3-: ;.% >38+)3 D&3,-+-#-+&3 +,
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
57/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
OR
/),%8 #1&3 -.% 0&30%1- &' "#$% &' ()* )38 '&2 )0.+%5+34 -.+, 0.%2+,.%8 4&)$< -.%
'2)9%2, &' >38+)3 D&3,-+-#-+&3 .), ),,+43%8 -.% ,1%0+)$ -),C -& -.% =#8+0+)26: ;.%
=#8+0+)26 +, -.% 4#)28+)3 &' -.% "#$% &' ()*: A%30% =#8+0+)26 +, 3&- -.% -.+28 1+$$)2 /#-
-.% 0%3-2)$ 1+$$)2 &' -.% 8%9&02)-+0 ,-)-%: H3 +38%1%38%3- &2 +91)2-+)$ E#8+0+)26 +, -.%
!"#$ &'( #)# )' ) .%)$-.6 ,&0+%-6: >- +, -.% $),- 2%,&2- '&2 -.% 0&99&3 1%&1$% &' ) 0-263 U1KD71 415D56221K
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
64/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
SK
;.% H1%G D- +3 89LK T/"!!( I),.%$8 -.)- +' -.% $)*
'+38, &3% -& /% 4#+$-6 &' 0&3-%91- )38 .% /&*, 8&*3 -& -.% =#849%3- &' -.% 0- -.)- +,
3&- )36 )8%W#)-% %G12%,,+&3 &' )1&$&46:
H1&$&46 +, )3 )0- &' 0&3-2+-+&3 )38 +- 9#,- 3&- /% ,.&23 &' 1%3+-%30%: ;%38%2+34 &'
)1&$&46 0)33&- /% ) 1)3)0%) +3 %5%26 0),% &' 0&3-%91-: >3 3
89;8 - +, +3-%38%8
-& /% %5+8%30% &' 2%)$ 0&3-2+/#-+&3< -.% 9)3$6 0&3,0+,3%,, &' ) *2&34 8&3%< &' )3
+3=#26 +3'$+0-%8 )38 -.% %)23%,- 8%,+2% -& 9)C% ,#0. 2%1)2)-+&3 ), $+%, +3 -.% *2&34
8&%2Y, 1&*%2: [3$6 -.%3 +- +, &' )36 )5)+$ +3 ) 0- &' E#,-+0%: K#- /%'&2% +- 0)3 .)5% -.)-
%''%0-< +- ,.$8 /% -%38%2%8 )- -.% %)2$+%,- 1&,,+/$% ,-)4%< 3&- -.% $)-%,-: O5%3 +' *+,8&9
8)*3, &3$6 )- ) $)-%2 ,-)4%< -.% )1&$&46 ,.$8 /% -%38%2%8 #32%,%25%8$6 )38
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
65/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
SO
#30&38+-+&3)$$6< /%'&2% -.% E#84% .), +38+0)-%8 -.% -2%38 &' .+, 9+38: a3$%,, -.)- +,
8&3%< 3&- &3$6 +, -.% -%38%2%8 )1&$&46 2&//%8 &' )$$ 42)0% /#- +- 0%),%, -& /% )3 )1&$&46:
>- 0%),%, -& /% -.% '#$$< '2)3C )38 9)3$6 0&3'%,,+&3 &' ) *2&34 8&3%< *.+0. +- +, +3-%38%8
-& /% QS# +.$ B(++$/ ), Y"/$# -)!$7 89;9 J/1 =1F1 KU (+ D1 K? J(CM1 H1&$&46 9#,- /%
5&$#3-)26< #30&38+-+&3)$ )38 +38+0)-+5% &' 2%9&2,% )38 0&3-2+-+&3 )38 +- ,.$8 /%
-%38%2%8 )- -.% %)2$+%,- &11&2-#3+-6 Q-.(CN.(#5/( Z(#6(5.(/ Z.(+$ 01 - +, 3&- 3%0%,,)26 -.)- %5%26 )1&$&46 +, -& /% )00%1-%8 /6 -.% 0-: H 0- 0)3 2%'#,%
-& )00%1- )3 )1&$&46 *.+0. +- 8&%, 3&- /%$+%5% -& /% 4%3#+3%< +- 0)3< %5%3 *.%3 +- )00%1-,
-.% )1&$&46< 0&99+- )3 &''%38%2 -& 12+,&3 &2 &-.%2*+,% 1#3+,. .+9:
;.% D- +3 [12 YLK17D PR 1 89L? ACC 8L? (+ D1 8L: ) .%$8 -.)- *.)- 9)6
)11%)2 -& ) ,&1.+,-+0)-%8 9+38 ), .)2,.< 2.< 2#8% )38 #30-.< 9)6 3&- /% ,& -&
#3,&1.+,-+0)-%8 )38 %5%3 -& )3426 +22+-)-%8< )38 /2&&8+34: ;.%2% +, 3&-.+34 -& .&$8 -.)-
-.% &11&3%3- *), )0-#)-%8 /6 8%,+2% -& 8+,2%1#-% 3&- ,#2% )/- .+, )/+$+-6 -& %G12%,,
*.)- .% '%%$, =#,- &2 #3=#,-: a38%2 -.%,% 0+20#9,-)30%,< -.%2% +, 3& .%,+-)-+&3 +3
)00%1-+34 .+, )1&$&46:
;.% D- 9)6 &2 9)6 3&- )00%1- )3 )1&$&46 4&%, -& ,%3-%30% )38 0)33&-< -.%2%'&2%< /%
)00%1-%8 *+-.- ) '+38+34 -.)- 0&3-%91- .), /%%3 0&99+--%8: A&*%5%2< )1&$&46 89IK *J I8U)K#- -.% 0&3-%91- /6 ) ,%3+&2 $)*6%2 0$8
3&- /% +43&2%8: ;.% 5+-#1%2)-+5% $)34#)4% *), -.% -0&9% &' ) 8%'%)-%8 H85&0)-%
*.+0. )11%)2%8 -& /% ) 5%26 ,%2+, 9)--%2 -& -.% A+4. D-: ;.% 9)--%2 /%0&9%,
9&2% ,%2+, *.%3 +- .), .)11%3%8 +3 ) B),'!!"C DC(N$ *.%2% -.%2% )2% &3% &2 -*&
0-, )38 ) '%* $)*6%2,< )38 -.% $+-+4)-+34 1#/$+0 +, 9&,-$6 +$$+-%2)-% &2 1&&2$6
%8#0)-%8< -.%2%'&2% #38%2 ,#0. 0+20#9,-)30%, 0&3-%91- +, 3&- -& /% +43&2%8 &2 )$$&*%8
-& 1),, /6 Q>(B( E(\(C7 W(/](/.( 01 G.$ *+(+$ ), W(5.\( 1 89I: *J 9O8 (+
D1 9O9)
(%"(['
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
69/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
SQ
-.%9,%$5%, +3 0-< )38 +3 %)0. 0),%: >3 )3 &1%3 =#,-+0% ,6,-%9< 3& =#84% )38 3& 0-
0)3 )5&+8 02+-+0+,9< ')+2 &2 '$: (&28 H-C+3 &30% ,)+8< ?E#,-+0% +, 3&- ) 0$&+,-%2%8 5+2-#%`
,.% 9#,- /% )$$&*%8 -& ,#''%2 -.% ,02#-+36 )38 2%,1%0-'#$< %5%3 -.. -,1&C%3- )+8%, -& 9)C% -.%
12&0%,, &' )89+3+,-%2+34 =#,-+0% %G1%8+-+, ), *%$$ ), #1.&$8, -.% 8+43+-6 )38 ')+-. -.%
1%&1$% .)5% /%,-&*%8 +3 -.% =#8+0+)$ ,6,-%9 &' -.% 0-26: >3 +-,%$'< +- )/,-)+3, '2&9 )36
'&29 &' )2/+-2)2+3%,,: >- 4+5%, %5%26 &24)3+7)-+&3 &2 +38+5+8#)$ 0.)24%8 #38%2 -.% )0-
2%),&3)/$% 42&, -& 8%'%38 +- &2 .+9,%$'< ), -.% 0),% 9)6 /%: ;.% 2%,-2+0-+&3,< +-
+91&,%,< +, =#,- )38 ')+2 +3 -.%9: e&2%&5%2< +- 2%0&43+7%, -.% %W#)$ '&&-+34 &' )$$ 1%&1$%
+3 -.% 0-26 /6 /2+34+34 -.% =#8+0+)26 )38 +-, &''+0+)$, *+-.+3 +-, )9/+-:
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
70/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RY
CONTEMPT
An act of deliberate disobedience or disregard for the laws ,
regulations, or decorum of a public authority such as a court
or legislative body.
CONTEMPT OF COURT
It is a behaviour that opposes or defies the authority, justice
and dignity of the court. Contempt charges may be brought
against parties to proceedings; lawyer or other court officers;
witness; or people who insert themselves in a case, such as
protesters outside a court room. Courts have great leeway in
making contempt charges , and thus confusion sometimes
exist about the distinction between types of contempt .
Generally , however, contempt proceedings are categorized as
civil or criminal.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
71/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
R"
SECTION 2 ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT
1971
a)Contempt of Court means civil contempt or criminal
contempt.
b) Civil contempt means wilful disobedience to any
judgement , decree, direction , order , writ or other
process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking
given to a court.
c)
Criminal contempt means the publication (whether by
words, spoken, or written ,or by signs , or by visible
representation or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of
any other act whatsoever which.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
72/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
R#
i. Scandalizes or tends to scandalise , or lowers or tends
to lower the authority of , any court;
ii. Prejudices , or interferes or tends to interfere with due
course of any judicial proceeding.
iii.
Interferes or tends to interfere with , or obstructs or
tends to obstruct , the administration of justice in any
other manner.
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGES
Criminal contempt charges become separate charges from the
underlying case . Unlike civil contempt sanctions, criminal
contempt charges may live or after resolution of theunderlying case.
One charged with criminal contempt generally gets the
constitutional rights guaranteed to criminal defendants ,
including the right to counsel, right to put on a defence, and
the right to a jury trial in certain cases. Charges of criminal
contempt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
73/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RC
However incarceration of contempt may begin immediately,
before the contempt charge is adjudicated and the sentence
decided. Depending on the jurisdiction and the case, the same
judge who decided to charge a person with contempt may end
up residing over the contempt proceedings.
Criminal contempt can bring punishment including jail time
and / or a fine.
DR. DC. SAXENA V/S HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE OFINDIA
In a clash of competing interests in constitutional contours,
this case calls to strike a balance between the freedom of
speech and expression, a salutary right in aliberal
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
74/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RK
democratic society and paramount countervailing duty to
maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.
The petitioner has initiated public interest litigation under
Article 32 of the Constitution to direct Sri P.V. NarasimhaRao, the President of Indian National Congress and the former
Prime Minister of the country to pay a sum of Rs.8.29 lakhsand odd said to be due to the union of Indian for use of Indian
Air Force aircraft or helicopters from October 1, 1993 to
November 30, 1993. Whenwrit PetitionNo. 432/95 was
posted for hearing on July 17,1995 before the learned Chief
Justice of India and brother Justice S.C. Sen the solicitor
General for India, Shri Dipankar P. Gupta was sent for and the
Court directed him to have the averments verified to becorrect and directed the petition to be listed after two weeks.On August 7,1995, the writ petition came before the Bench
comprising the learned CJI, Justice S.C. Sen and Justice K.S.Paripoornan. It is not in dispute that the Solicitor General had
placed the record before the Court and upon perusal thereofand after hearing the petitioner-in-person, the Bench
summarily "dismissed"" the writ petition which had triggeredthe petitioner to file yet another writ petition, this time againstthe learned Chief Justice of India, Justice A.M. Ahmadi. The
Registry raised objections for its maintainability but, at eh
insistence of the petitioner, it was posted, with officeobjections, for hearing, as unregistered Writ petition (c) NO. -
17209/95 on January 13,1996 before a Bench of three learned
Judges, viz. Justice J.S. Bharuchal. The petitioner, again
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
75/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RO
appearing in person, persisted to justify the averments madeagainst the learned CJI, Justice A.M. Ahmadi in the writ
petition. In spite of the Court having pointed out that theaverments were scandalous, the proceeding of the Court did
indicate that the petitioner reiterated that he "stood by the
averments made therein" and sought for declaration [1] thatJustice A.M. Ahmadi is unfit to hold the office as Chief
Justice of India; [2] that he should be tripped of hiscitizenship; [3] to direct registration of an FIR against him
under various provisions of Indian penal Code for committing
forgery and fraud and under the prevention of Corruption Act;(4) to direct prosecution of him under the prevention of
Corruption Act; (5) to direct him to defray from his personalpocket the expenses incurred by the petitioner in filing the two
writ petitions, i.e., W.P. No. 432/95 and the second writpetition; (6) to direct justice A.M. Ahmadi to reimburse fromhis pocket to the public exchequer the entire loss caused to the
State,. as a consequence of non-payment of the dues by SriP.V. Narasimha Rao with interest at 18% per annum and (7)
other consequential directions. After hearing the petitioner,the Bench dismissed the second writ petition with the order as
under: "The several averments in the writ petition are
scandalous and it is surprising that the petitioner, who is saidto be a Professor in a University, has chosen to draft and file
such a writ petition. His understanding of the meaning of
Article 32 of the Constitution, is to say the least, preposterous.
The allegations made are reckless and disclose irresponsibility
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
76/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RS
on the part of the petitioner. This writ petition is wholly
misconceived and is an abuse of the process of the Court. The
writ petition has no merit. The writ petition is, therefore,
dismissed. In view of the attitude of the petitioner even at thehearing, when the persisted in this stand and, on our asking
him, reiterated that he stood by the scandalous averment madetherein, we consider it our duty to issue to the petitioner a
notice to show cause why proceedings to punish him for
contempt of this Court should not be initiated against him.The Registry to take the necessary steps for registering the
matter as a contempt petition. The petitioner who is present-in-person is given notice of the contempt petition. He is
required to file his reply within four wheels to show causewhy proceedings for contempt should not be initiated against
him. We request the learnedSolicitor General to assist the
Court in this contempt matter.List the matter after notice ofthe date fixed by Registry is given to Dr. D.C. Saxena and the
Solicitor
General."
While dismissing the petition, this Court observed in the later
part of the order the petitioner's conduct in his persistence tostand by the scandalous averments made against the learnedChief Justice of India. This Court was constrained to initiate
contempt proceedings and enlisted 14 instances which would
prima facie constitute contumacious conduct of the petitioner
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
77/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RR
to scandalise the Court. In the meanwhile, the petitioner wrotein a newspaper criticising Justice J.S. Verma. Resultantly,
Justice J.S. Verma reclused himself from the Bench. Thus thematter was posted before this Bench.
On April 12,1996, the petitioner filed his reply to the showcause notice styling the same as "preliminary submissions"
and reiterated his averments, which, as pointed by this Court,
would constitute scandalisation of the Court and yet he had
given his justification for accusing the chief Justice of India.However, at the end, as a foot-note, he has written in his ownhand-writing as under: "N.B. If some passages seem strindent
or pungent, the defendantis willing to suitably modify them."
On April 14,1996, this court passed the order as under;"Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court the Contemnor
Dr. D.C.Saxena is present today in person. He has stated that
he would modify the offending portions noted in the showcause notice in Item (ii),(iv) (vi), (vii), (viii), (x),(xii),(xiii)
and wishes to withdraw unconditionally item (xiv), paras B
and C. The learned Solicitor General has pointed out that evenif the Contemnor withdraws or files statement in the modified
form what the Court required to do is whether his statementsmade in the writ petition originally filed constitute contempt
of the Court or not statements would not be of materialrelevance for consideration. Since the contemnor seeks timeto submit the show contemnor seeks time to submit the show
cause in the modified language which he wishes to place
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
78/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RX
before the court, at his request the matter is adjourned to may2,1996 at 2.00p.m. The Registry is directed to supply
complete set of papers to learned solicitor General."
When the case came up for hearing on May 2, 1996, the
petitioner filed amended portions to substitute the avermentsmade, at proper places, in the second unnumbered writ
petition. We have heard learned Solicitor General as amicus
curiae and the petitioner-in-person. Before opening the case,
the solicitor General, in view of the seriousness of theaverments made by the petitioner in the petition filed againstthe chief Justice of India, and in view of his stand in both the
preliminary submissions to the contempt notice and therevised averments made in the writ petition, suggested that it
would be advantageous for the petitioner to have consultationand legal assistance of any counsel of his choice and to revise
his stand, but the petitioner remained silent and got along with
the case. The learned solicitor General stated that on July 17,1995, the Court had sent for and called upon him to have the
allegations made in the first writ petition, verified and to placethe factual position before the Court. Pursuant thereto, on
August 7,1995, he had placed the record before the Court
which are confidential in nature. After their perusal andhearings the petitioner, the Court did not think it necessary to
issue the directions as sought for. At this stage, we would
point out that when Sri P.V. Narasimha Rao, as president of
Indian National Congress
or as the former prime Minister,
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
79/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
RQ
was alleged to have used the defence aircrafts, this Courtobviously was of the view that the relationship between the
two wings of the Government or the political party, i.e., theIndian national Congress is of debtor and creditor and that,
therefore, prerogative writ under Article 32 of the
Constitution would not lie to enforce contractual duesadjustable as per their practice. The exercise of the power
under Article 32 was, therefore, obviously thought to beuncalled for. Supreme Court being the highest Judicial forum,
the need to record reasons is obviated since there is no further
appeal against the order of this Court. Recording reasons isnot, therefore, necessary nor is called for.
The learned solicitor General, therefore, contended that when
the Court dismissed the writ petition, the petitioner, being aprofessor of English in Chandigarh University, should have
exercised restraint and felt duty- bound not to proceed further
in the matter. Instead, he filed the second writ petition withallegations which are ex-facie contumacious. The petitioner
reiterated the same in his preliminary submissions to thenotice of the contempt. His modified statement filed on April
24,1996 itself is not relevant. What would be material and
relevant for consideration is whether the allegations madeagainst the learned Chief Justice of India in the Second Writ
petition do constitute contempt of the Court. The modified
stand, therefore, is not relevant to adjudge whether thepetitioner has committed contempt of this Court. The Court,
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
80/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XY
therefore, has to consider the totality of the averments andtheir effect on the judicial process to adjudge the conduct of
the petitioner to be contumacious. The petitioner contendedthat he did not seek any personal gain for himself. As a duty-
bound citizen, he was actuated to see that the public dues are
recovered from any person how-so-high he may be. To thebest of his understanding, the petitioner made the averments
for public good and he has no intention to scandalise theCourt. He had approached this Court earlier more than 12
times to vindicate public justice. As a human being, he is
fallible but he has no intention to denigrate the Court to whichhe has highest respect. His modified language in the statement
filed on April 24,1996 does indicate his intention.
In the proceedings of the Court dated July, 17,1995, it wasrecorded that the Solicitor General had appeared for Sri P.V.
Narasimha Rao who was impleaded in his personal capacity.
It is the petitioner's contention that the solicitor Generalcannot appear for him. He was not assisting the Court as
amicus. When the Chief justice called for the records from theGovernment through solicitor General, it is Court's duty to
give him copies of those documents but the same were denied
to him. It is his xiv) Page 9 prayer
(a) Declare the respondent unfit to holdofficeas chief Justice
of
India;
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
81/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
X"
(b) Strip the respondent of his citizenship;
(c) Direct the registration of an F.I.R. against the respondent
under the Indian penal Code for committingforgery and fraud;
(d) Direct the respondent'sprosecutionunder thepreventionofcorruption Act.
The alleged contemnor filed written submissions in reply tothe contempt notice. His first submission was that the Bench
which had heard and dismissed the second writ petition hadbeen constituted by the respondent, who had thereby become
a judge in his own cause. The second writ petition was,
accordingly, not listed before a court, competent to dispose itof, so that the order of its dismissal was non est, and it was
still deemed to be pending. The contempt notice was,
therefore, premature. The written submissions then dealt withthe portions of the second writ petition which had been
indicated in the contempt notice and reiterated the same,except only that it was submitted that the allegation about
fabrication of the court proceedings of 7th August, 1995, was"somewhat unhappily would". It was submitted thereafter thatthe contempt of Courts Act was a legacy of British
imperialism and, while appropriate to a "banana republic",
was imcompatible with a democratic, people's polity; it was a
law-less law because it fused the offices of the prosecutor andthe judge and "belongs with the infamous Spanish
inquisition". After his signature at the foot of the written
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
82/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
X#
submissions, the alleged contemnor added in hand, "N.B. Ifsome passages seem strident or pungent, the defendant is
willing to suitably modify them."
The contempt notice came up before this Bench on 15th April,
1996. The following order was then passed; "Pursuant to thenotice issued by
this court the Contemnor Dr. D.C.. Saxena is present today in
person. He has stated that he would modify the offendingportions noted in the show cause notice in Item (ii),(iv),(vi),
(vii),(viii),(x),(xi),(xii),(xiii) and wishes to withdrew
unconditionally item xiv, paras B and C. The learned SolicitorGeneral has pointed out that even if the Contemnor withdraws
or files statement in the modified form what the Courtrequired to do is whether originally filed constitute contempt
of the statements would not be of material reliance time to
submit the show cause in the modified Court, at his request ehmatter is adjourned to may 2,1996 at 2.00 P.M. The Registry
is directed to supply complete set of papers to learned
Solicitor
General."
extract the relevant portions supplied to him by show causeand his reply thereto and of preliminary submissions and his
modified statement as a substitution to the averments made inthe second writ petition and the effect thereof. In respect of
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
83/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XC
the averments made in the offending portions of item 1,3,5,9,13 and 14(a) and (d), the petitioner stood by them. He
submitted his modified statement on April 24,1996 only forthe rest of the statements. Let us first consider the unmodified
averments before examining the original and the modified
averments. The first averment made at page 4 in paragraph 9
is that "it was improper for justiceAhmadi to hear it". Item 3
at page 6 in paragraph 14 is: "To this Justice Ahmadi
responded that he (the solicitor General) was there to assistthe Court, contrary to the evidence of the court proceedings".
Item 5 relating to the averments made in page 6 in paragraph17 is; "the subsequent course of action by Justice Ahmadi, in
dealing with the grouse of the petitioner and dismissing hispetition is totally unjust, unfair, arbitrary and unlawful. It is inflagrant violation of the mandates of Article 14 of the
constitution, which "runs like a golden thread" through it ad is
the foundation of justice and fair play". Item 9 relating to the
averments made at page 8 in paragraph 18(f) is: "what are thelegal consequences of the violation of the sacred oath of office
by justice Ahmadi?" Item 14(a) relating to the prayer portionis: "declare the respondent (justice A.M. Ahmadi) unfit tohold office as Chief Justice of India" and item 14(d) is:
"Direct the respondent's (Justice A.M. Ahmadi's) prosecutionunder the prevention of Corruption Act." The petitioner in his
affidavit filed in support of the second writ petition has stated
in para 2 thereof thus: "I am actuated purely by national
interests and no personal gains and have truthfully and
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
84/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XK
carefully stated the facts (emphasis supplied), in pursuance ofmy fundamental duties, which can be effectively performed
only through the fundamental rights enjoyed as a citizen ofIndia." In his preliminary submissions, he has stated that the
writ petition under Article 32 shall be heard by a Division
Court of not less than 5 Judges. Emphasis was added by thepetitioner himself. Since the writ petition was not listed before
a Court components to dispose of the same, it made the orderof dismissal non est and it should be deemed to be pending
and is "not yet decided and disposed of constitutionally". No
contempt proceedings can, therefore, be initiated. The noticeis , therefore, pre-mature. Constitution of the Bench by the
chief Justice is in violation of the principles of natural justiceas no one can be a judge of his own cause. Justice "should not
only be done but should manifestly and undoubtedly seem tobe done. nothing is to be done which creates even a suspicionthat there has been an improper interference of the course of
justice.", he quoted the above statement of Lord Heward, C.J.Regarding Item 1 referred to hereinbefore; he justified the
imputation stating that no person can be a Judge in his owncause directly or indirectly. In spite of his objection, the
respondent (CJI) chose to constitute the bench himself as a
presiding judge. According to the petitioner the word "improper", therefore was used in that perspective, with regard
to the averments made in Item 3, his reply was that the Court
proceedings dated July 17,1995 recording that the solicitor
General, Shri Dipankar Gupta appeared in his official capacity
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
85/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XO
to Sri P.V. Narasimha Rao, a private party. He had stated thateven assuming, though not conceding, that he (Solicitor
General was acting as amicus curiae also was not recorded inthe Court proceedings. Therefore, his comment that CJI had
Fabricated false record is fair and an accurate report of the
court proceedings protected under section 4 of the Act. Withregard to Item 5, he states thus: " This is a reaffirmation of an
unimpeachable legal proposition in the most widely-prevalentlegal phraseology, to which no umbrage can be taken, for by
this logic all petitions containing this phrase would be deemed
contemptuous. Even the part of the quotation is from a leadingdecision of this Hon'ble Court in Maneka Gandhi's case."
With regard to averments made in item 9, he justified it
stating that "this again is an unresolved question of great legalsignificance and he cited as analogy of Mr. Fazlul Huq, then
Chief Minister of Bengal and quoted a passage from a special
Bench decision of the Calcutta High Court in R.C. Pollard v.Satya Gopal Majumdar [A.I.R. 1943 Cal. 594 (605)]. He
added special emphasis to the words "the clear violation of itbrands a man as unfit for public office" and stated that it is a
legal question of substantial importance relating to the
violation of oath of office, contained in the Third Scheduledof the Constitution and it cannot be disposed of by a three
judge Bench. It cannot be considered as personal imputation
against the judge. With regard to imputation and prayer (a) initem 14, he says that the analogy he had taken from the
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
86/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XS
Calcutta High Court decision. It was natural corollary to thelegal proposition considered by a constitution Bench. with
regard to prayer (d) in Item 14, he states that this is only aprayer for relief sought. The defence taken in relation to
(xiv)(b) and (c) would equally be applicable and so he has
reaffirmed them to be correct. The allegations, therefore, areneither "reckless" nor do they "disclose irresponsibility" (put
within inverted comma by the petitioner himself) and is not"an abuse of the process of the Court."
He reiterated that "several averments in the writ petition"being truthful, factual, and made without rancour or malice
and for no personal, gain, should not be construed"scandalous" (inverted commas were put by the petitioner
himself).
Let us now consider other imputations, in the language of
petitioner himself with regard to the "truthfully and carefully"stated facts. At page 5 in para 10, the petitioner has stated that
"Justice Ahmadi's utmost reluctance to perform his
fundamental duties and constitutional obligations wasapparent. when after failing to browbeat the petitioner, he
stated that it would be taken up at the end of the cause list." inhis preliminary submissions he has stated that "this is a fair
and accurate submission of the Court proceedings on matterwhich had already been "heard and finally decided"."(invertedcommas were put by the petitioner himself). He sought
protection to it, as a fair comment, under Section 4 of the Act.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
87/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XR
He further justified it stating that even the use of the would"browbeat" by the petitioner is a "fair criticism of judicial act"
(inverted comma was put by the petitioner himself) to implythat proper hearing was not being granted to the petitioner
who had approached the highest Court of the land to 'Protect
and safeguard public property". he justified them as a"statement of truthful facts", for public good should not be
construed as disrespect to the Hon'ble Court. After offeringjustification in his modified statement, he reiterates thus: "The
petitioner discerned reluctance on the part of the presiding
judge to allow the relief claimed, which was inpublic interest,
and actuated by the desire to "Preserve and protect public
property," without any personal malice." It would, thus,indicate that the petitioner imputed motives to Justice A.M.Ahmadi, chief justice India, in the discharge of his
constitutional duty and that by not admitting the writ petition
or dismissing the petition, the CJI was reluctant to perform his
constitutional duty. He knew that the word "browbeat" is astrident imputation to the Court and, therefore, in his modified
reluctance". Even in the modified statement, he attributedmotives to CJI in the performance of his constitutional dutywhile the Bench that dismissed the first writ petition consisted
of three judges. By inference, he suggested the other brotherJudges to be mere non-entity. With regard to item 4 at page 6
in para 15, he imputed to the CJI that "and without recording
the reasons for dismissing the petition. So much for the
vaunted adherence to the twin principles of transparency and
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
88/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XX
accountability." In his preliminary submissions, he has givenjustification for his attributed motives to CJI stating that the
Solicitor General handed over some documents to the bench,without supplying the copy thereof to the bench, without
supplying the copy thereof to the petitioner. When he had
objected to it in his own language, he avers that "justiceAhmadi asked him to argue on the supposition that nothing
had been given to the bench. In view of this, reference hasbeen made to the "twin principles of transparency and
accountability which", according to the petitioner, "is a fair
and accurate report of court proceedings, which is also for the"public good"." (inverted commas were put by the petitioner
himself). In the modified statement he stated thus: "Thatjustice Ahmadi ultimately dismissed the petition, observing
that the Government of India was capable to realise the duesfrom Shri Rao (which it had no to done in two years) andwithout recording the reasons for dismissing the petition, for
which lapse it has often berated High Courts, in pursuance ofthe twin principles of transparency and accountability". It
would, thus be seen that as regards this imputation, thepetitioner gives justification that there was omission to record
reasons for dismissal of the writ petition; he imputed to CJI
that the CJI facilitated Sri Narasimha Rao to avoid payment ofpublic dues. The act of the Court was not transparent.
According to the petitioner, it is a lapse on the part of the
Court for which the Court conduct, by implication, was not
transparent and the Court must be accountable.
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
89/171
JANHIT COLLEGE OF LAW
XQ
Item 6 at page 7 in paragraph 18(c) reads thus: "For causingfabrication of courts proceedings of 7th August, 1995, and not
mentioning the fact of appearance of the solicitor General,would justice Ahmadi not be liable to prosecution under the
relevant provisions of the Indianpenal codein consonance
with the time-honoured maxim, `Be you ever so high, the lawis above you"?" (inverted commas were put by the petitioner
himself). In his preliminary submissions he stated that
"Although somewhat unhappily worded, it is one of thesubstantial questions of law, which needed to be determined
by a constitution Bench of the apex court". According to him,above maxim is one to which this court has repeatedly stated
to have avowed allegiance. In his modified version, he statedthus: "For inaccurate recording of the court proceedings of 7August, 1995, and not mentioning even the fact of appearance
of the solicitor General for the respondent, what responsibility
would ensue on the presiding judge, who dictated them?" It
would, therefore, in the language of the petitioner, be"discernible" difference of the imputation as originally made
in the writ petition and reiterated in his preliminarysubmissions and its impact was understood by the petitioner.Therefore, he made the amended version imputing
responsibility to justice Ahmadi personally for the so calledinaccurate recording of the Court proceedings and stated that
the CJI should be prosecuted for the record said to be falsely
recorded by CJI after fabrication and it is a fraud and CJI is
liable for prosecution for fraud etc. Item 7 at page 6 in
-
7/24/2019 K- 710 Professional Ethics by Mr. Lokendra Singh
90/171
JANHIT