kagra brt/gpt preliminary results...l2 lb lg1 lg2 lg3 lg4 r=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results
Junko Katayama, Matteo Barsuglia
![Page 2: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Backscattering / reflection • Tolerancing / aberrations ( Zemax, see presentation by C.Buy) • Constraints on the alignment system
• Open questions ?
• Which configuration (lenses, mirrors, others?) • Should we suspend the telescope? • Is there a configuration which minimizes the coupling with the bench displacements?
Outline
![Page 3: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Configuration/1: lenses
BRT�GPT�
ETM�
QPD�
L2� LG2� LG3�LB� LG1� LG4�
R=1.77 m f=1.96 m�
f1� f2�
d�
n3� n3�
n3� n3�
n2�R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m�
![Page 4: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Configuration/1: mirrors
BRT�GPT�
ETM� QPD�
L2�
LG2� LG3�
LB�
LG1�LG4�
R1�
R2� f1� f2�
d�
Θ1�
Θ2�
![Page 5: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Beam radius evolution
BRT2 (w~ 3 mm
BRT1 (w~ 30 mm)
L1 (w~ 2.6 mm)
L2 (w~ 0.7 mm)
1/10
![Page 6: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Computation of heq/1: simple model
€
h = fscTλ
4π1L
sin(ϕ) = f scKend sin(ϕ) ~ f scTLx
• Only term in phase with GW is considered in this formula • Same transfer function for GW and scattered light • Coupling not frequency dependent
![Page 7: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Computation of heq: Effect of the radiation pressure
• Frequency dependend coupling factor • Increase of coupling in the 10-100 Hz region • If time avaiblable: check with other simulations (Finesse, MIST), check what happens decreasing the power
Y.Aso’s Optickle simulation
Impact of upconverted scattered light on advanced interferometric gravitational wave detectors, Ottaway et al., Optics express 2012
Pcav=500 kW Pin= 78 W T=10 ppm M=20 kg
![Page 8: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Computation of heq/2: Optickle simulation
€
h = fsc4πλ
PinP
= f scKend sin(ϕ) ~ f scTLx
• Only term in phase with GW is considered in this formula • Same transfer function for GW and scattered light • Coupling not frequency dependent
![Page 9: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Seismic noise
From M.Beker
![Page 10: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Scattering: Lenses at normal incidence
• No measurement (at our knowledge) of BRDF at small anglesf on AR components
• Measurements at < 1 deg very difficult, but BRDF measured at ~ 5 deg could already give some indications.
• We need a measurement on a sample with 2 AR faces and same surface quality needed (to avoid the contamination by the diffusion of the 2nd face)
• Measurements are on going at LMA on the compensation plates AR/AR superpolished
![Page 11: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Seismic noise
• How to compute upconversion?
![Page 12: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Light recombined = RAR * [overlap integral]2
• Overlap between incoming beam and reflected beam
• RAR=100 ppm • 8 surfaces (4 BRT, 4 GPT) • No tilt – normal incidence
• Tilt drastically reduces the coupling • Check if we can tilt the lenses (with Zemax)
Direct reflection by the lenses
![Page 13: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Reflection – BRT (simple model)
![Page 14: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Reflection – GPT (simple model)
![Page 15: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reflection – BRT+GPT (simple model)
![Page 16: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reflection – leading term
![Page 17: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Reflection – leading term – zoom
![Page 18: KAGRA BRT/GPT Preliminary results...L2 LB LG1 LG2 LG3 LG4 R=1.77 m f=1.96 m f1 f2 d n3 n3 n3 n3 n2 R=-0.15 m f= - 0.167 m Configuration/1: mirrors BRT GPT ETM QPD L2 LG2 LG3 LB LG1](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040723/5e347d9387f8d9446b575f9f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
We assume a Lambertian distribution (BRDF = constant TIS/π)
Scattering of superpolished components
Blue : roughness <1 angst Red: roughness 4-5 angst
Hypothesis (some numbers)
• Superpolished (~ 3 angst) • TIS=10 ppm, BRDF=3x10-6 strd-1
• Parabolic (roughness ~ 1 nm) • TIS=150 ppm, BRDF= 50x50-6 strd-1
Credit: L.Pinard