kansas energy committee meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc...

17
Kansas Energy Committee Meeting January 29, 2013

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

Kansas Energy Committee Meeting

January 29, 2013

Page 2: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

2

This presentation includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,

and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements express a belief, expectation or intention

and are generally accompanied by words that convey projected future events or outcomes. The forward-looking statements

include statements about SandRidge Energy, Inc.’s future operations, rig counts, drilling and resource locations, corporate

strategies, including our focus on the Horizontal Mississippian play, our goal to achieve a self-funding capital program while

growing production and improving our credit metrics, estimates of oil and natural gas production, reserve and resource volumes

and values, projected revenue, expenses, capital expenditures and other costs, earnings, capital raising activities, including the

divestment of Permian Basin assets and related senior note refinancing, and hedge transactions. We have based these forward-

looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our

perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors we believe are

appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform with our expectations and

predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the volatility of oil and natural gas prices, our success in

discovering, estimating, and developing oil and natural gas reserves, the availability and terms of capital, the successful

integration of recent acquisitions, our timely execution of hedge transactions, credit conditions of global capital markets, changes

in economic conditions, regulatory changes, including those related to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions, and other

factors, many of which are beyond our control. We refer you to the discussion of risk factors in Part I, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” of

our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and in comparable “risk factors” sections of our Quarterly

Reports on Form 10-Q filed after the date of this presentation. All of the forward-looking statements made in this presentation are

qualified by these cautionary statements. The actual results or developments anticipated may not be realized or, even if

substantially realized, they may not have the expected consequences to or effects on our company or our business or operations.

Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those

projected in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

The SEC permits oil and natural gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserves,

as each is defined by the SEC. At times we use the term "resources" and refer to their location and potential to provide estimates

that the SEC’s guidelines prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates are by their nature more speculative

than estimates of proved, probable or possible reserves and, accordingly, are subject to substantially greater risk of being actually

realized by the company. For a discussion of the company’s proved reserves, as calculated under current SEC rules, we refer you

to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K referenced above, which is available on our website at www.sandridgeenergy.com

and at the SEC‘s website at www.sec.gov.

Regulation G Disclosure

This presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined under SEC Regulation G. A reconciliation of those

measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is available on our website at www.sandridgeenergy.com .

Disclaimer

Page 3: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

3

Oklahoma City

Corporate Profile

Permian

225,000 net acres

≈ 7,350 net locations

Current rig count: 3

Mid-Continent

Mississippian

≈ 1,850,000 net acres

≈ 11,000 net locations(e)

Current rig count: 32

Market Value ($ in billions)

Market Cap (01/04/13) $ 3.2

Net Debt(a) 3.6

Preferred Stock 0.8

Enterprise Value $ 7.6

Reserves (YE 2011)

Proved Reserves (MMBoe)(b) 533

% Oil(c) 91%

% Developed 53%

Resource Potential (MMBoe)(d) 4,400 W. Texas Overthrust

• Oil producing region • Gas producing region

GOM

Current rig count: 2

(a) Contains a non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure can be found on our website

(b) SandRidge consolidated reserves with royalty trusts, Pro Forma Dynamic Offshore

(c) Weighted by PV-10 value

(d) As of YE 2011; Net of JVs & royalty trusts; Based on the 01/17/12 NYMEX strip

(e) Based on 4 wells per section

Page 4: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

4

• One of the largest stratigraphic traps in

North America

• Over 17,000 vertical producing wells

drilled since the 1930s

• 1,365 horizontal wells drilled as of

year-end 2012

• Conventional, carbonate reservoir with

high porosity

Mississippian Overview

• Horizontal Wells

• Vertical Wells

Page 5: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

5

Kansas

Oklahoma

Mississippian – 1,365 Drilled Wells and 76 Active Rigs

• 600 SandRidge horizontal wells (b)

‒ 396 Hz operated wells drilled in 2012

‒ SD ≈ 11,000 potential locations (a)

• 765 Industry horizontal wells (b)

(a) Based on 4 wells per section

(b) Drilled well counts as of 12/31/12

• SD ≈ 1.85 Million net acres

Wells Drilled Active Rigs

SandRidge 600 32

Chesapeake 327 4

Mid-States (Eagle) 74 4

Range 43 4

Devon 39 8

Shell 32 4

Calyx 24 0

HighMount 22 4

Plymouth 17 1

PetroQuest 12 1

Territory Res. 11 0

Other 164 14

TOTAL 1,365 76

Note: Industry activity as of 12/31/12

Page 6: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

6

•Net Acres: ~1,850,000 ~11,000 potential drilling locations(a)

18 year drilling inventory

•Rig Count: 32(b) Industry Leader: Over 2x nearest peer

•Production: 30.2 MBoe/d (3Q12) Industry Leader

•Wells Drilled: 600(b) Industry Leader: ~45% of total Miss wells

•Salt Water Disposal Wells: 113(b)

Industry Leader

SandRidge: Leader in the Mississippian

a) Based on 4 wells per section

b) As of December 31, 2012

• SD Horizontal Wells

• Peer Horizontal Wells

Page 7: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

7

A Proven Record of Growth in the Mississippian

• Mississippian drilling driving organic

growth

• Production from the Mississippian has

increased over 18x since 3Q10

• Commodity mix steady at ~45% oil and

55% natural gas

• ~80% of Mississippian cash flows come

from oil production 0.3

0.81.6

3.6

5.4

8.5

12.7

15.5

19.3

25.2

30.2

29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12

Rig

s

Mb

oe

/d

Average Quarterly Volumes

Average Quarterly Rig Counts

Production Growth

Production Mix

47%43%

46% 46%48% 50%

44%

0%

25%

50%

75%

1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12

Oil M

ix

SD Wells Drilled

2010 37

2011 167

2012 396

2013E 581

Page 8: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

8

Mississippian Performance – 30 Day Average Rates

<100

30

Da

y A

ve

rag

e P

ea

k R

ate

(B

oe

/d)

101 – 500 501 – 1,000 > 1,000 Boe/d Range

19 (KS)

Wells

59 (OK)

Wells

36 (KS)

Wells

253 (OK)

Wells

6 (KS)

Wells

58 (OK)

Wells

4 (KS)

Wells

11 (OK)

Wells

Total Program: 446 Wells

30 Day Avg Rate: 328 Boe/d

Avg. 50

Boepd

Avg. 59

Boepd

Avg. 254

Boepd

Avg. 264

Boepd

Avg. 641

Boepd

Avg. 668

Boepd

Avg. 1,266

Boepd

Avg. 1,671

Boepd

Key to the Play – Repeatable Results Over Large Scale Play

KS Wells OK Wells

65 (KS) Wells 293 Boe/d

381 (OK) Wells 334 Boe/d ≈ 80% Wells with

30 Day Avg IP

100 – 1,000 Boe/d

*As of 10/31/12

Page 9: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

9

Kansas Mississippian – Industry Activity

Apache

Encana

Tug Hill

Shell

Woolsey

Industry Horizontal Activity

Note: Industry activity as of 12/31/12

SandRidge: KS Hz Miss Activity

• Drilled 121 wells in Kansas

– 74 Producing with 30 days

production

291 Boe/d (30 Day Avg)

• 61% of all wells drilled to date

• 47% of active rigs

Kansas Horizontal Mississippian Activity

Wells Drilled Active Rigs

SandRidge 121 9

Shell 32 4

Tug Hill 10 3

Encana 6 1

Woolsey 5 1

Apache 1 0

Chesapeake 6 0

Unit 4 1

Other 12 0

Industry Subtotal 76 10

Total 197 19

SandRidge acreage

SandRidge horizontal wells

Industry horizontal wells

Page 10: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

10

SandRidge Investing in Kansas

• $246 Million invested in leasehold(a)

• >9,250 Individual leases purchased

• >1,250,000 Net acres leased

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012

Cumulative Leases Purchased

-

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012

Cumulative Net Acres

Kansas Leasehold

a) through year-end 2012

Page 11: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

11

-

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Q1-2011 Q2-2011 Q3-2011 Q4-2011 Q1-2012 Q2-2012 Q3-2012 Q4-2012E

Gro

ss

MB

OE

SandRidge’s Kansas Growth Story

Total Kansas Production by SandRidge and its Partners

•SandRidge and its partners produced over 2.5 MMBoe in 2012

Page 12: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

12

2013 Capital Expenditure Plans

2013E

Well Count Total

Gross Net Capex ($MM)

Drilling and Completion

Mid-Continent 581 379 $1,230

Mid-Continent - SWD 74 54 140

Permian 219 212 140

Gulf of Mexico N/A N/A 200

All Other Areas N/A N/A 0

JV Carry N/A N/A (550)

Total Drilling and Completion 874 645 $1,160

Infrastructure, Workovers & Non-Op 230

Capitalized G&A and Interest 60

E&P Capital Expenditures $1,450

Land 100

Oil Field Services 30

Midstream and Other 170

TOTAL $1,750

• SD has allocated ~$700MM or 30% of its 2013 capital budget to the development of Kansas property

$2 $4

$13

$31

$58

$79

$116

7%

15%

23%

25%

35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 Q4'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12

$ M

M

KS Total Capex

KS as a % of Total Miss Capex

Historic Drilling and Production Capex SandRidge Total 2013 Capex

Page 13: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

13

Mid-Con Jobs Creation

OCU Report

• Oklahoma City University recently conducted a study of the economic impact of the oil and gas industry

on local economies

• The report concluded that for every $1.0 million investment in drilling by the oil and gas industry, 1.2

jobs are directly created, and 4.9 jobs are created through the multiplier effect

• The report also concluded that for every $1.0 million invested by the O&G industry, $338,836 directly

flowed through the local economy, adjusted to $584,389 via the multiplier effect

Page 14: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

14

Infrastructure Investments Secure Competitive Advantage and Maximize Value

Salt Water Disposal System Overview Electrical Overview

Total Miss KS Miss Total Miss KS Miss

• 113 active disposal wells

as of year-end 2012 • 30 active disposal wells

as of year-end 2012 • Targeting 7 SD-owned substations

by year-end 2013 • Targeting 2 SD-owned

substations by year-end 2013

• Over 700 miles of pipeline • 130 miles of pipeline • ~500 miles of distribution lines • ~ 75 miles of distribution lines

• Disposal rate of over 650 MBoW/d • Disposal rate of over

650 MBoW/d • Leaders in the play in securing

access to power

Page 15: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

15

• Power – Access to an economic source of power is critical in the play

in order to run artificial lift systems and transfer produced water

– Connecting to the local power grid is the preferable source, as on-site generators are costly and adversely impact the economics of the wells

– Oklahoma Example: SandRidge constructs private infrastructure/substations and installs distribution lines, while ensuring backup generators are available in the event demand on the grid peaks and capacity needs to be spared

• Permitting – Timely permitting is key in order to not hinder development

plans

Electrical Infrastructure Initiatives

Page 16: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

16

• Generate high rates of return from

quality oil assets

• Drive double digit growth through

Mississippian drilling program

• Dominant acreage position and scale

with repeatable results

SandRidge: Growing with the Mississippian S

andR

idg

e S

trate

gy

• Continue focus on improving credit

metrics

• Lock in returns and protect downside

through multi-year hedging

• Permian divestiture pre-funds

Mississippian development

Page 17: Kansas Energy Committee Meetingkslegislature.org › li_2014 › b2013_14 › committees › misc › ...Jan 29, 2013  · increased over 18x since 3Q10 •Commodity mix steady at

Contact: Kevin R. White, SVP – Business Development Address: 123 Robert S. Kerr Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73102 | Phone: 405-429-5515

Email: [email protected] | Website: www.SandRidgeEnergy.com