karl smith university of minnesota civil engineering

19
University of Missouri – Rolla Center for Educational Research & Teaching Innovation January 5, 2006 Karl Smith Karl Smith University of Minnesota University of Minnesota Civil Engineering Civil Engineering Design and Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Large Classes Course, Class Session, and Learning Module Design: From Objectives and Evidence to Instruction

Upload: troy-meyer

Post on 30-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Design and Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Large Classes Course, Class Session, and Learning Module Design: From Objectives and Evidence to Instruction. University of Missouri – Rolla Center for Educational Research & Teaching Innovation January 5, 2006. Karl Smith - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

University of Missouri – RollaCenter for Educational Research & Teaching Innovation

January 5, 2006

Karl SmithKarl Smith

University of MinnesotaUniversity of Minnesota

Civil EngineeringCivil Engineering

Design and Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Large Classes

Course, Class Session, and Learning Module Design: From Objectives and Evidence to Instruction

Page 2: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

22

Effective Course Effective Course DesignDesign

Students

Goals andObjectives

Assessment

ABET EC 2000

Bloom’sTaxonomy

Course-specificgoals & objectives

Cooperative learning

Lectures

Labs

Other experiences

Classroomassessmenttechniques

Tests

Instruction

Other measures

Technology

(Felder & Brent, 1999)

Page 3: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

33

Backward DesignWiggins & McTighe

Stage 1. Identify Desired Results

Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence

Stage 3. Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction

Wiggins, Grant and McTighe, Jay. 1998. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Page 4: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

44

Backward Design

Stage 1. Identify Desired Results

Filter 1. To what extent does the idea, topic, or process represent a big idea or having enduring value beyond the classroom?

Filter 2. To what extent does the idea, topic, or process reside at the heart of the discipline?

Filter 3. To what extent does the idea, topic, or process require uncoverage?

Filter 4. To what extent does the idea, topic, or process offer potential for engaging

students?

Page 5: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

55

Backward DesignStage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence

Types of Assessment

Quiz and Test Items: Simple, content-focused test items

Academic Prompts: Open-ended questions or problems that require the student to think critically

Performance Tasks or Projects: Complex challenges that mirror the issues or problems faced by graduates, they are

authentic

Page 6: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

66

Backward Design

Stage 3. Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and

principles) and skills (procedures) will students need to perform effectively and achieve desired results?

What activities will equip students with the needed knowledge and skills?

What will need to be taught and coached, and how should it be taught, in light of performance goals?

What materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals?

Is the overall design coherent and effective?

Page 7: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

77

Model 1

The Key Components Of INTEGRATED COURSE DESIGN

One of the benefits of this model is that it allows us to see the importance S i t u a t i o n a l F a c t o r s

Teaching and

Learning Activities

Feedback & Assessment

Learning Goals

A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant LearningL. Dee Fink. 2003. Creating significant learning experiences. Jossey-Bass.

Page 8: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

88

Worksheet 1Worksheet for Designing a Course/Class Session

Ways of Assessing Actual Teaching-Learning

Helpful Resources:

Learning Goals for Course/Session:

This Kind of Learning: Activities: (e.g., people, things)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Page 9: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

99

Taxonomies

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive Domain (Bloom & Krathwohl, 1956)

A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001).

Facets of understanding (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Taxonomy of significant learning (Dee Fink, 2003)

Page 10: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1010

The Six Major Levels of Bloom's Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain(with representative behaviors and sample objectives)

Knowledge. Remembering information Define, identify, label, state, list, match Identify the standard peripheral components of a computer Write the equation for the Ideal Gas Law

Comprehension. Explaining the meaning of information Describe, generalize, paraphrase, summarize, estimate

In one sentence explain the main idea of a written passage Describe in prose what is shown in graph form

Application. Using abstractions in concrete situations Determine, chart, implement, prepare, solve, use, develop

Using principles of operant conditioning, train a rate to press a bar

Derive a kinetic model from experimental data Analysis. Breaking down a whole into component parts Points out, differentiate,

distinguish, discriminate, compare Identify supporting evidence to support the interpretation of a literary passage Analyze an oscillator circuit and determine the frequency of oscillation

Synthesis. Putting parts together to form a new and integrated whole Create, design, plan, organize, generate, write

Write a logically organized essay in favor of euthanasia Develop an individualized nutrition program for a diabetic patient

Evaluation. Making judgments about the merits of ideas, materials, or phenomena Appraise, critique, judge, weigh, evaluate, select

Assess the appropriateness of an author's conclusions based on the evidence given Select the best proposal for a proposed water treatment plant

Page 11: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1111

Facets of UnderstandingWiggins & McTighe, 1998, page 44

When we truly understand,weCan explainCan interpretCan applyHave perspectiveCan empathizeHave self-knowledge

Page 12: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1212

Dee Fink – Creating Significant Learning Experiences

A TAXONOMY OF SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

1. Foundational Knowledge

• "Understand and remember" learning

For example: facts, terms, formulae, concepts, principles, etc.

2. Application

Thinking: critical, creative, practical (problem-solving, decision-making)

Other skills

For example: communication, technology, foreign language

Managing complex projects

3. Integration

Making "connections" (i.e., finding similarities or interactions) . . .

Among: ideas, subjects, people

4. Human Dimensions

Learning about and changing one's SELF

Understanding and interacting with OTHERS

5. Caring

Identifying/changing one's feelings, interests, values

6. Learning How to Learn

Becoming a better student

Learning how to ask and answer questions

Becoming a self-directed learner

Page 13: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1313

Backward Design Approach:Backward Design Approach:

Desired Results (Outcomes, Desired Results (Outcomes, Objectives, Learning Goals)Objectives, Learning Goals) 5 minute university5 minute university

Evidence (Assessment)Evidence (Assessment) Learning TaxonomiesLearning Taxonomies

Plan InstructionPlan Instruction Cooperative Learning Planning Format & Cooperative Learning Planning Format &

FormsForms

Page 14: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1414

Challenged-Based LearningChallenged-Based Learning Problem-based learningProblem-based learning Case-based learningCase-based learning Project-based learningProject-based learning Learning by designLearning by design Inquiry learningInquiry learning Anchored instructionAnchored instruction

John Bransford, Nancy Vye and Helen Bateman. Creating High-Quality Learning Environments: Guidelines from Research on How People Learn

Page 15: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1515

Problem-Based Learning (PBL)-- Small Group Self-Directed Problem Based

Learning --

Problem-based learning is the learning that results from the

process of working toward the understanding or resolution

of a problem. The problem is encountered first in the learning process. (Barrows and Tamblyn, 1980)

Core Features of PBLCore Features of PBL Learning is student-centered Learning occurs in small student groups Teachers are facilitators or guides Problems are the organizing focus and stimulus for learning Problems are the vehicle for the development of clinical

problem-solving skills New information is acquired through self-directed learning

Page 16: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

Problem Based Cooperative Learning Format

TASK: Solve the problem(s) or Complete the project.

INDIVIDUAL: Estimate answer. Note strategy.

COOPERATIVE: One set of answers from the group, strive for agreement, make sure everyone is able to explain the strategies used to solve each problem.

EXPECTED CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS: Everyone must be able to explain the strategies used to solve each problem.

EVALUATION: Best answer within available resources or constraints.

INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: One member from your group may be randomly chosen to explain (a) the answer and (b) how to solve each problem.

EXPECTED BEHAVIORS: Active participating, checking, encouraging, and elaborating by all members.

INTERGROUP COOPERATION: Whenever it is helpful, check procedures, answers, and strategies with another group.

Page 17: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

Conversations in Teaching and Learning [MSU] - 3/14/03

17

Cooperative Lesson Planning Form Grade Level: __________ Subject Area: ____________________ Date:__________

Lesson: ________________________________________________________________

Objectives

Academic: ______________________________________________________________

Teamwork Skills: _______________________________________________________

Preinstructional Decisions

Group Size: __________ Method Of Assigning Students: ____________________

Roles: _________________________________________________________________

Room Arrangement: ____________________________________________________

Materials: _____________________________________________________________

One Copy Per Group One Copy Per Person

J igsaw Tournament

Other: ______________________

Explain Task And Cooperative Goal Structure

1. Task: _______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

2. Criteria For Success: _________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

3. Positive Interdependence: ____________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

4. Individual Accountability: ___________________________________________

5. Intergroup Cooperation: ______________________________________________

6. Expected Behaviors: ____________________________________________________

Page 18: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

Conversations in Teaching and Learning [MSU] - 3/14/03

18

Monitoring And Intervening

1. Observation Procedure: ______ Formal ______ Informal

2. Observation By: ______ Teacher ______ Students ______ Visitors

3. Intervening For Task Assistance: _____________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

4. Intervening For Teamwork Assistance: ________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

5. Other: ______________________________________________________________

Evaluating And Processing

1. Assessment Of Members’ Individual Learning: _________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

2. Assessment Of Group Productivity: ___________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

3. Small Group Processing: _____________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

4. Whole Class Processing: _____________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

5. Charts And Graphs Used: ____________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

6. Positive Feedback To Each Student: __________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

7. Goal Setting For Improvement: _______________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

8. Celebration: _________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

9. Other: ______________________________________________________________

Page 19: Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering

1919

We never educate directly, but indirectly by means of the environment. Whether we permit chance environments to do the work, or whether we design environments for the purpose makes a great difference.John Dewey, 1906

It could well be that faculty members of the twenty-first century college or university will find it necessary to set aside their roles as teachers and instead become designers of learning experiences, processes, and environments James Duderstadt, 1999