kas_14157-544-1-30

Upload: shady-selim

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    1/43

    Organization/Structure ofThink Tanks

    Dr. Martin ThunertHeidelberg Center for American StudiesHeidelberg University

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    2/43

    What is a think tank?

    Think tanks come in all shapes and sizes

    The term think tank stems from the U.S.-based RAND Corporation, which operated as

    a closed and secure environment for U.S.strategic thinking after World War II.

    Popular usage after 1960s for a group of

    specialists who undertake intensive study ofimportant policy issues

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    3/43

    UNDP Definition (2003)

    organizations engaged on a regularbasis in research and advocacy on anymatter related to public policy. They

    (think tanks) are the bridge betweenknowledge and power in modern

    democracies

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    4/43

    Mission StatementsConnecting researchers and decision-makers

    Close to, but not part of the government

    Brain trust, helping governments think

    Idea brokers, idea agencies for the publicDecision-support, developing a vision forcountry X or policy field Y (IDSC)

    Scientific methodology, information provider(IDSC)

    Denken und Verkaufen (thinking and selling)

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    5/43

    Ad hoc think tanksThe term ad hoc think tank" can be defined as either

    a structure or a process.As a structure, a think tank is defined in terms of atemporary organization or group focused on theresolution of a particular problem or task, particularly

    in the reams of science and technology.As a process or technique, it is defined as an in-depthconsideration of issues and challenges whoserelevance reaches beyond the individual person or

    program and the immediate time frame.

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    6/43

    Categories of Think TanksTaking into consideration the comparative

    differences in political systems and civilsocieties, the following categories attempt

    to capture the full range of think tanksfound around the world today

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    7/43

    Categories of Think Tanks (1-

    2)Political Party Affiliated

    Examples include Konrad Adenauer Foundation(Germany, est. 1964), Friedrich Ebert Foundation(Germany), Jean Jaures Foundation (France,

    1990), or Progressive Policy Institute (U.S., 1988).

    Government Affiliated

    Examples include China Development Institute(PRC, 1989), IDSC (Egypt), and CongressionalResearch Service (U.S., 1914), Prime MinistersPolicy Unit/Strategy Unit etc. (UK 1971).

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    8/43

    Categories of Think Tanks (2-

    4)Quasi-Governmental - Funded exclusively by government grants

    and contracts but not a part of the formal structure ofgovernment. Examples include: Institute for Strategic & International Studies

    (Malaysia, 1983), Korean Development Institute (Korea, 1971), andWoodrow International Center for Scholars (U.S., 1968, SWP(Germany 1962).

    Autonomous & Independent - Significant independence fromany one interest group or donor and autonomous in itsoperation and funding from government. Examples include: Pakistan Institute of International Affairs

    (Pakistan, 1947), Institute for Security Studies (South Africa,1990), and Institute for International Economics (U.S., 1981)

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    9/43

    Categories of Think Tanks (5-

    6)Quasi-Independent - Autonomous from government but

    controlled by an interest group, donor, or contracting agencythat provides a majority of the funding and has significantinfluence over the think tanks operations. Examples include European Trade Union Institute (Belgium, 1978),

    Bertelsmann Foundation (Germany 1977) and Center for DefenseInformation (U.S., 1990), European Council of Foreign Relations(?), EU 2006), Avenir Suisse (CH 2001)

    University Affiliated Examples include Foreign Policy Institute, Hacettepe University

    (Turkey, 1974), The Carter Center, Emory University (U.S., 1982)and the Hoover Institution, Stanford University (1918), Center for

    Applied Policy Research CAP (Germany 1995)

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    10/43

    Types of Think Tanks

    Academic Think TankAdvocacy Think Tank

    Contract Research Think Tank

    (Party think tank)

    (Legacy think tank)

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    11/43

    Five TypesIndependent civil society think tanksestablished as non-profit organisations orphilanthropic operating foundations

    Policy research institutes located in oraffiliated with a university

    Governmentally created or state-sponsoredthink tank

    Corporate created or business affiliated thinktank

    Political party (or candidate) think tank.

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    12/43

    Models of Think Tank StoriesAmerican model/UK model A private policy-analysis industry

    Very strong independence from government,some independence from parties and associations,

    but not from private and corporate donors(Continental) European model a publicly-funded policy-analysis industry and

    publicly-funded think tanks Arms-length government think tanks, think tanks

    aligned with parties and associations

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    13/43

    Asian Think Tank Story1st generation

    Sounding board for government, set upwithin government

    State-directedAmplify top-down messages to the rest

    of societyRegime enhancing, rather than regimecritical

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    14/43

    My Impression / My QuestionThe story of IDSC resembles the Asian think

    tank story:Analytical weakness of the bureaucracy as aresult of practises that rewarded loyalty andobedience, conservatism and conformityforced the leadership to solicit expertise fromreform-minded institutes and quasi-

    independent experts.Should in-house policy advice remaininadequate or irrelevant, the leaders might beprompted to look outside the state for policyadvice

    F h I fl Thi k

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    15/43

    Factors that Influence Think

    Tank Development

    Political/Institutional Environment

    Legal and Financial Environment

    Intellectual/Ideological Environment

    Labour and Staffing Environment

    Think Tank / Academic Environment

    Technological Environment

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    16/43

    Key Choices and Trade-OffsFinancing Choices National donors/international donors

    Public funding / private funding

    Single payer / diverse funding sources

    Agenda Choices Full-service think tank with broad research focus

    Specialized think tank with narrow research focus

    Image Choices Neutral/non-partisan or ideological/partisan image

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    17/43

    Key Choices (cont.)Locational Choices Nations capital, Brussels or member states etc.

    Staffing Choices In-house research staff or adjunct and project

    staff

    Product Choices Academic books and papers, and/or policy briefs

    Oral consultation (briefing seminars for policymakers and the media

    Dissemination tools

    P li D l t d Thi k

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    18/43

    Policy Development and Think

    Tanks in Country XPosition in the world

    Development model

    Domestic problems

    General features of existing think tanksThe policy-making environment Who makes policy?

    State of policy research Universities and tenure system

    Accessibilty of important data

    Is there a third or philathropic sector

    T d b f ThT i

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    19/43

    Types and numbers of ThT in

    EuropeLargest numbers of institutes are beingfound in UK and Germany

    Marketplace of Ideas Model

    Think tanks compete, serving business andpublic sectors

    Corporatist or Academy Model Partisan foundation research

    Research institutes tied to academic world

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    20/43

    Consequence(s)There is no single model of operating asa think tank

    Think tanks must clearly define the

    added value that they provide tocarefully identified stakeholders

    ThT are expected to add analyticalrigour to an otherwise politicizeddiscussion of hot issues

    Institutional Profile: Think

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    21/43

    Institutional Profile: Think

    Tanks...... sometimes bring together varioussides of the debate to a common table

    ... ensure access to the key speakers

    for different sides of the argumentwhile maintaining an appropriatedistance to any of them

    ... need a clear definition of purposeand profile of the organization

    Can you run a think tank like a university

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    22/43

    Can you run a think tank like a universitydepartment or a pure academic

    research institute?

    Think Tanks need to react quickly to policy

    initiatives of governments in a nearlyjournalistic manner

    ThT need to come up with answers based on

    in-depth analysisIdeally, think tanks are one step ahead of thepublic in knowing upcoming policy initiatives

    The voice of a think tank must not bemistaken for that of the government, party,or a specific interest group

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    23/43

    Management guidelineManagers of think tanks cannot lean tooheavily towards either the academic,

    journalistic or bureaucratic mode of

    operation,but instead, they need to use the

    required elements and as a result comeup with a distinctive and customisedbusiness model for their organisation

    Learning from the U S and

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    24/43

    Learning from the U.S. and

    Europe

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    25/43

    Management IssuesStaff-related issues

    Quality control

    Productdevelopment

    Team leaders andmiddle managers

    Board of Trusteesand Board ofDirectors

    Structuring research

    staff

    Communication

    Overhead

    Staffing Arrangements &

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    26/43

    Staffing Arrangements &

    Research Team StructureVery dominant

    resident staff (somevisitors are present,but not integral forthe institutesoperations

    (Brookings model)

    Resident staff with

    associates (AEI)Resident staff withvisiting scholars

    (PIE)Blend of residentstaff, visitingscholars andassociates (CEPS,CFR)

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    27/43

    Discussion points: StaffFixed vs. variable

    structure of researchareas

    Donors demand moreflexibility

    Expertise areas shouldmatch the topics ofcurrent debate or

    contempory fields ofdomestic andinternational policy (e.g.DIW)

    Loyalties of experts

    Experts should beclosely identitied

    with their homeinstitution

    Avoid dual careers

    for experts

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    28/43

    Discussion Points: Staff (2)Size and

    Composition ofresearch teams

    Drive towards

    reducing costs mustbe offset by theneed to take on,

    retain and provideincentives for high-quality experts

    Form teams of

    researchers atdifferent levels ofexperience

    The ratio of seniorto rank-and-file

    permanent staffmembers standsaround 1:2 or 1:3

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    29/43

    Staffing choicesEuropean think

    tanks prefersalaried, full timeemployment as a

    standard form ofemployment

    Payment of hourly

    or daily consultantfees is not lessexpensive

    Most think tanks use

    internships to screenpotential team members

    Technical expertise and

    the advantage ofbringing in fresh bloodspeak for the occasional

    reliance on additional,non-permanent staff

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    30/43

    RecruitmentSome organisations

    prefer to codify theirexpectations in internaldocuments, such asstaff regulations, work

    guidelines etc.Some organisationsdevelop their own

    distinctive culture, i.e.An unwrittenagreement, executedthrough daily practise

    More mature

    organisations are insearch for mid-career professionals

    Custom-madecontracts

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    31/43

    Methods of RecruitmentDo you advertise

    positions in the press?Rare for entry levelpositions

    Vacancy information onthe website

    Everybody in a think

    tank is on the lookoutfor suitable additions toresearch team

    Potential candidates are

    located via their outputsor through word-of-mouth

    Many Europeaninstitutions agree that itis preferable to hirecandidates with little or

    no experience ofworking at anotherthink tank

    fresh staff is preferred

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    32/43

    Supervision and TrainingInformation overload

    and conflictingcommitments

    Analytical methods andtime management

    Coaching by moreexperienced researchers(mentors)

    Director of researchmust solve intra-teamconflicts

    Conflicts may result

    from unclearallocation ofresponsibilities andauthorities

    Formal training or

    learning by doing?

    Retention and Incentives to

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    33/43

    Retention and Incentives to

    Expert StaffSalaries should be high

    enough to reduce theincentives for engagingin other non-core

    activitiesUniversities andgovernment service

    usually serve asreferences for salaries

    In U.S. And Europe

    tht-researchersmight opt for thepolicy analysissector to thetemporary or

    permanent exclusionof academia

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    34/43

    Profile of ideal staffGraduates from top

    universitiesInsightful and rigorousanalysts whocommunicate findings ina concise andunderstandable mannerto the media and the

    general public, and arewell connected topolicy-makers

    Are you looking for

    hard qualificationsonly, or rather for amix of soft skills?

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    35/43

    Dissemination: GeneralThink tanks - not

    academic researchinstitutes - makedissemination anessential part oftheir mission

    How important are

    books (=monographs) in theproduct line?

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    36/43

    Diversity of ProductsWorking papers

    Background to key issues

    Shorter issue papers

    Policy briefs

    Diagnosis and forecast ofcurrent developments

    Regular newsletters to

    membershipPost-event analyses

    A public policy journal

    Online publishing (up to

    75%)blogs

    Measure downloads,

    media visibilityPricing and subsciption

    Distribution of products

    is closely tied tomembership policy

    Discounts for members

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    37/43

    Media RelationsApproach media

    proactively tocommunicate yourgeneric positions on

    issuesUse opportunities to beassociated with specific

    topics on the publicagenda as your fieldof expertise

    Experts rarely

    contribute to the mediawith op-eds or lettersindependently of theirthink tank affiliation

    Make sure that expertsof your organisationprovide their affiliations

    in the by-lines andensure properreferencing

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    38/43

    Publication processIn-house publication

    via website and in-house publicationdepartment

    Some offer theirpublicatiopn via a

    third party, e.g. apublishing house

    (Blind) Peer review

    other than inacademia?

    Everyone commentson everyone elseswork

    What is, then, a successful

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    39/43

    , ,

    think tank?Analytical rigour without

    getting slowed downand violating the timeframes set by donorsand required by the

    publicCommunication ofcomplex ideas and

    presentation of viablepolicy choices withouttrivializing them toomuch

    Avoids day-to-day

    political conflictOne that makes clear asto why it is needed on acompetitive market ofpolicy ideas and whosemission is apparent toanyone working for it,

    sponsoring it, readingits publications, orattending its events

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    40/43

    Managers must be

    able to read thesign of the timesand proactivelymodify thestructure, operations

    and externalrelations, ifnecessary

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    41/43

    ConclusionsDevelop strong

    teams of in-houseexperts, if you can

    They areindispensable in thedissemination of

    research results andpolicyrecommendations

    The quality of core

    experts will largelydetermine the ThTsreputation

    Even small teams ofexperts require the

    distinction betweensenior and juniorresearchers

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    42/43

    Core funding not

    only project funding- is essential, thusmembership can bethe solution

    Project work

    requires researchersto becomefundraisers

    Design a benefits

    package for members(with e.g. Privilegedaccess to events,

    publications etc.Integrate research anddissemination

    Diversify theinstruments ofdissemination

  • 8/3/2019 kas_14157-544-1-30

    43/43

    Experts should have

    good communicationand dissemination skills

    Event and publicationmanagers should havea good understandingof the policy issues theexperts are working on

    Think more aboutdiscussion forums,blogs etc.

    Think tanks need to

    be manageddifferently thanother organisations