kate turner ibsc poster master

1
Using ‘The Maker Movement’ to develop empathy in Kindergarten boys KATE TURNER THE HUTCHINS SCHOOL International Boys’ Schools Coalition Action Research Program 2015 – Boys as Makers Key Findings and Discussion 1. Evidences of empathy within the making: During the maker experiences there were many examples of boys offering to help their peers when they could see they were having some difficulty. These examples demonstrate for me the success of the notion of using making as a culture for fostering empathy in Kindergarten boys, specifically while listening to stories with a focus on empathy which encourages this type of thinking and working. 2. A transition of empathetic focus: It is interesting to note that after listening to many stories within the maker sessions, the final session which focused on the children’s storytelling making showed a transition of thinking for them. There are many examples where the children’s storytelling begins with examples of their own personal stories but then move onto the experiences of others. 3. Improved articulation of empathetic intelligence: I was impressed in the post-testing period by the improvement in the “empathetic” vocabulary of the children. Key Readings 1. Arnold, R. (2005) Empathetic Intelligence: teaching, learning, relating, University of New South Wales Press. 2. Bryant, B. An Index of Empathy for Children and Adolescents in Child Development Vol. 53, No. 2 (Apr., 1982), pp. 413-425. 3. Hatch, M. (2013) The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers, McGraw-Hill. 4. Martinez, S. and Stager, G. (2013). Invent to Learn; Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom, Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press. 5. Norfleet-James, A. (2007) Teaching the Male Brain: How Boys Think, Feel, and Learn in School, Corwin. 6. Stringer, E. (2002). Action research in education, SAGE Publications, Inc. Further Information This poster and further information is available at http://www.theibsc.org/ . Researcher’s Email: [email protected] Researcher’s Blog: http://kturneribsc.edublogs.org / Introduction This project addressed the potential for Kindergarten boys to improve their empathy. As an experienced Kindergarten teacher I have noted that boys of this age can often be very quick to judge each other. They compare each other’s abilities and can often use negative comments to identify a peers’ weaknesses. I used the motivation of ‘making’ combined with an inter- generational storytelling approach to both highlight different abilities and strengths but also as a platform for educating the boys further about difference, and providing an environment where they can support each other through challenges. The research aimed to identify whether this action improves Kindergarten boys’ overall empathy. In Empathetic Intelligence: teaching, learning, relating, Arnold’s (2005) thoughts link directly with the direction of this research, she discusses a focus on curiosity, combined with relationships with community members and narratives which are at the centre of this project. Conclusions Overall I am pleased that the data reflects using storytelling with community during maker projects benefits the development of the kindergarteners’ empathy. At the very least the action conducted during this project provided a platform for growth in the area of empathetic intelligence. I intend to include the action within the Kindergarten program on a yearly basis. Not only was the empathetic focus beneficial for my students but there were many other interdisciplinary benefits I observed anecdotally such as fine motor control, team work, creativity, curiosity and problem-solving to name just a few. The Research Question How does storytelling with community during maker projects foster empathy in Kindergarten boys? The Research Action We held four “Maker Days” running for 3 hours with several stations set-up for boys to move between. During these sessions community members worked with the Kindergarten boys on maker projects using the time to support the boys’ in their making using storytelling as a form of their own making. The focus of their stories was empathy. Without the community members intertwined with the actual making during the “Maker Days”, it would not only be difficult to run due to the age of the children, but the motivation for the students’ listening to the ‘empathy tales’ would be lost. Therefore what may appear two actions; inclusion of community members to story tell and “Maker Days”, are considered as one maker action. The aim of intertwining the making and storytelling was to recreate the intergenerational and historically social and cultural scenarios of making and storytelling such as knitting circles or whittling around a campfire in order to impact on the students’ empathetic intelligence. Participants As I only teach Kindergarten, it was a given that I would work with the 22 boys in my class. Anonymity was ensured and the opportunity to opt out of the project given. This option was taken up by one participant, reducing my sample group to 21 boys aged 4-5 years. Data Collection I used qualitative data in this research which included: interviews with individual participants observations and field notes including photography and videos, and questionnaires. a pre and post-questionnaire with students before the “Maker Days” took place, to determine the level of their pre-action empathy. Data Analysis I looked for emerging themes within the questionnaire results and children’s voices via discourse analysis and unstructured observation. Themes within interviews and observational quotes were transcribed in Microsoft Word and then related to the research question before interpretation of findings took place. Research Context The Hutchins School is a Kindergarten to Year 12 School for boys with a student body of 1100 students. Our mission states that Hutchins is an Anglican school whose supportive learning community works together to build character of boys. The focus of this project on wellbeing, and more specifically empathy, aligns directly with the School’s mission statement. Student E noticed that the marble run was too tall for student K to reach. He offered to put the marble down the chute for him and then (with support of an adult) problem solved and suggested they move the marble run off the table and onto the floor so student K could reach it himself. “Remember [Student N’s name] has trouble speaking and it’s not his fault.” explained Student P to Student M. “Good job [Student N’s name],” encouraged Student P. Student P noticed Student N was upset about needing to move away and not be working with his Mum anymore. He offered his advice on a strategy to use when feeling anxious about being away from your mother: “When my Mum goes on holiday I hug her and never let her go and then I feel ok when she goes” (Student P). They had developed from predominantly using the words ‘good’, ‘bad’, ‘happy’ and ‘sad’ to describe emotions…. …to a point where they were including a repertoire of expressive emotional words such as ‘scared’, ‘angry’, ‘different’, ‘lonely’, ‘nice’, ‘awesome’, ‘strange’, ‘afraid’, ‘alone’, ‘rude’, ‘frustrated’ and ‘proud’ to describe how people are feeling or acting.

Upload: kate-turner

Post on 18-Aug-2015

19 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kate turner ibsc poster master

Using ‘The Maker Movement’

to develop empathy in Kindergarten boysKATE TURNER

THE HUTCHINS SCHOOL

International Boys’ Schools Coalition Action Research Program 2015 – Boys as Makers

Key Findings and Discussion1. Evidences of empathy within the making:

During the maker experiences there were many examples of boys offering to help their peers when they could see

they were having some difficulty. These examples demonstrate for me the success of the notion of using making

as a culture for fostering empathy in Kindergarten boys, specifically while listening to stories with a focus on

empathy which encourages this type of thinking and working.

2. A transition of empathetic focus:

It is interesting to note that after listening to many stories within the maker sessions, the final session which

focused on the children’s storytelling making showed a transition of thinking for them. There are many examples

where the children’s storytelling begins with examples of their own personal stories but then move onto the

experiences of others.

3. Improved articulation of empathetic intelligence:

I was impressed in the post-testing period by the improvement in the “empathetic” vocabulary of the children.

Key Readings1. Arnold, R. (2005) Empathetic Intelligence: teaching, learning, relating,

University of New South Wales Press.

2. Bryant, B. An Index of Empathy for Children and Adolescents in Child

Development Vol. 53, No. 2 (Apr., 1982), pp. 413-425.

3. Hatch, M. (2013) The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in

the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers, McGraw-Hill.

4. Martinez, S. and Stager, G. (2013). Invent to Learn; Making, Tinkering, and

Engineering in the Classroom, Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge

Press.

5. Norfleet-James, A. (2007) Teaching the Male Brain: How Boys Think, Feel,

and Learn in School, Corwin.

6. Stringer, E. (2002). Action research in education, SAGE Publications, Inc.

Further InformationThis poster and further information is available at http://www.theibsc.org/.

Researcher’s Email: [email protected]

Researcher’s Blog: http://kturneribsc.edublogs.org/

Introduction

This project addressed the potential for Kindergarten boys to improve their

empathy. As an experienced Kindergarten teacher I have noted that boys of this

age can often be very quick to judge each other. They compare each other’s

abilities and can often use negative comments to identify a peers’

weaknesses. I used the motivation of ‘making’ combined with an inter-

generational storytelling approach to both highlight different abilities and

strengths but also as a platform for educating the boys further about difference,

and providing an environment where they can support each other through

challenges. The research aimed to identify whether this action improves

Kindergarten boys’ overall empathy.

In Empathetic Intelligence: teaching, learning, relating, Arnold’s (2005)

thoughts link directly with the direction of this research, she discusses a focus

on curiosity, combined with relationships with community members and

narratives which are at the centre of this project.

ConclusionsOverall I am pleased that the data reflects using storytelling with community

during maker projects benefits the development of the kindergarteners’

empathy. At the very least the action conducted during this project provided a

platform for growth in the area of empathetic intelligence.

I intend to include the action within the Kindergarten program on a yearly basis.

Not only was the empathetic focus beneficial for my students but there were

many other interdisciplinary benefits I observed anecdotally such as fine motor

control, team work, creativity, curiosity and problem-solving to name just a few.

The Research QuestionHow does storytelling with community during maker projects foster empathy in

Kindergarten boys?

The Research Action• We held four “Maker Days” running for 3 hours with several stations set-up

for boys to move between.

• During these sessions community members worked with the Kindergarten

boys on maker projects using the time to support the boys’ in their making

using storytelling as a form of their own making.

• The focus of their stories was empathy.

• Without the community members intertwined with the actual making

during the “Maker Days”, it would not only be difficult to run due to the age

of the children, but the motivation for the students’ listening to the

‘empathy tales’ would be lost. Therefore what may appear two actions;

inclusion of community members to story tell and “Maker Days”, are

considered as one maker action.

• The aim of intertwining the making and storytelling was to recreate the

intergenerational and historically social and cultural scenarios of making

and storytelling such as knitting circles or whittling around a campfire in

order to impact on the students’ empathetic intelligence.

ParticipantsAs I only teach Kindergarten, it was a given that I would work with the 22 boys in

my class. Anonymity was ensured and the opportunity to opt out of the project

given. This option was taken up by one participant, reducing my sample group

to 21 boys aged 4-5 years.

Data CollectionI used qualitative data in this research which included:

• interviews with individual participants

• observations and field notes including photography and videos, and questionnaires.

• a pre and post-questionnaire with students before the “Maker Days” took place, to determine the level of their

pre-action empathy.

Data AnalysisI looked for emerging themes within the questionnaire results and children’s voices via discourse analysis and

unstructured observation. Themes within interviews and observational quotes were transcribed in Microsoft Word

and then related to the research question before interpretation of findings took place.

Research Context• The Hutchins School is a Kindergarten to Year 12 School for boys with a

student body of 1100 students.

• Our mission states that Hutchins is an Anglican school whose supportive

learning community works together to build character of boys.

• The focus of this project on wellbeing, and more specifically empathy, aligns

directly with the School’s mission statement.

Student E noticed that the marble run was too

tall for student K to reach. He offered to put the

marble down the chute for him and then (with

support of an adult) problem solved and

suggested they move the marble run off the

table and onto the floor so student K could

reach it himself.

“Remember [Student N’s name] has

trouble speaking and it’s not his

fault.” explained Student P to

Student M. “Good job [Student N’s

name],” encouraged Student P.

Student P noticed Student N was upset

about needing to move away and not be

working with his Mum anymore. He

offered his advice on a strategy to use

when feeling anxious about being away

from your mother:

“When my Mum goes on holiday I hug

her and never let her go and then I feel

ok when she goes” (Student P).

They had developed from

predominantly using the

words ‘good’, ‘bad’,

‘happy’ and ‘sad’ to

describe emotions….

…to a point where they were including a

repertoire of expressive emotional words such

as ‘scared’, ‘angry’, ‘different’, ‘lonely’, ‘nice’,

‘awesome’, ‘strange’, ‘afraid’, ‘alone’, ‘rude’,

‘frustrated’ and ‘proud’ to describe how people

are feeling or acting.