kc water biosolids facility improvements
TRANSCRIPT
KC WaterBiosol ids Faci l i ty ImprovementsT e r r y L e e d s , D i r e c t o rM a t t B o n d , D e p u t y D i r e c t o rJ e f f M a r t i n , C h i e f E n g i n e e r i n g O f f i c e rB l a k e A n d e r s o n , P r o j e c t M a n a g e r
O C T O B E R / N O V E M B E R 2 0 2 0
DETERMINING THE NEEDF O R A B I O S O L I D S FA C I L I T Y I M P R O V E M E N T S P R O J E C T
• Costly incinerator upgrades• Air emissions challenges• Landfills not available, no longer a viable
option• Class B biosolids have limited beneficial use
DETERMINING THE NEED
3
OW NER’S ADVISOR
4
• Staff augmentation• Technical guidance • Delivery method analysis
and recommendation• Risk identification and
analysis support• Owner’s agent through
construction• BIM Development
RIGHT PEOPLE
RIGHT TIME
MAKING“RIGHT”
DECISIONS
COST ANDSCHEDULE
MGMTDELIVERYMETHODS
RISKMGMT
WHOLE PLANT
SIMULATIONPRE- ANDPOST-THP
ENERGYMGMT
THPPROCESS
SIDESTREAMTREATMENT
RIGHT DECISIONS
5
OW NER’S ADVISOR TEAM
Conceptual Design
RFQ/RFP Development
Preliminary Design
D/B Selection Assistance
SUCCESSNext Exit
OPT IONS CONSIDEREDS U S TA I N A B L E D E C I S I O N S P R O C E S S E S
7
OPTIONS CONSIDEREDMulti-Hearth Furnace
Photo Credit: Shaun O’Kelley , Blue River WWTP
Thermal Hydrolysis
Photo Source: Wikimedia, THP -https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50970357
Lime StabilizationPhoto Source: www.irishwaste.net/service/industrial-services/mobile-lime-stabilisation-plants/
Fluidized BedPhoto Source: Kuzu Grup, Fluid Bed -http://www.kuzugrup.com/en/proje/buski-fluidized-bed-sludge-incineration-and-energy-production-plant/
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Environment Community Financial Operations Total
Quadruple Bottom Line Evaluation of Alternatives
2 Fluidized Bed Multi-Hearth Furnance Thermal Hydrolysis Lime
Environment-Great Resource Recovery (Nutrients & Biogas) -Class A Biosolids-Lower Regulatory Risk-Lower Greenhouse Gas Permit-Reducing Air Emissions
Community1) Fewer Odors
8
PROJECT ELEMENTS• Designed to handle max. month of 94 dry tons
of sludge per day• Raw Sludge from three (3) facilities:
• Blue River WWTP• Westside WWTP• Birmingham WWTP
• Sludge screening• Pre and post dewatering with centrifuges• Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) Treatment
System• Biogas cleaning• Boiler system for steam production• Cake loadout facility
918
PROPOSED THP SYSTEM
THP Units
Primary Sludge
PS Screens
East Sludge
Holding Tank
CentrifugesPre-dewatering
Polymer Feed System
THP Feed Tank
Thickened WAS
Existing Systems
New Process
To Land Application
or Landfill
Storage and Loadout
On-site Boiler/
Steam Generator
Combined Heat Power (future)
Biogas Cleaning
Anaerobic DigestersHeat Exchanger West Sludge
Holding Tank
Centrifuges
Polymer Feed System
Not Shown: Odor
Control, FOG, and
Sidestream Management Systems
Post-dewatering
10
BIOSOLIDS FACIL ITY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
11
BENEFIT S
BENEFITS
13
Elimination of incineration and
emissions
All solids processed through existing digesters
Class A product, beneficial use of
biosolids
Energy recovery Odor reduction
PROCUREMENT MET HOD AND SCHEDULE
Owner
Design/Builder
Design-Bid-Build(DBB)
Construction Management-at-
Risk (CMAR)
Fixed-PriceDesign-Build
(FPDB)
“Progressive”Design-Build
(PDB)
Design-Build-Operate/
Finance, etc.
Traditional Delivery Alternative or Collaborative Delivery
Owner
Design/Builder
Owner
Designer CM
Owner
Designer Builder
Owner
Design/Builder
Operator
Design/Builder
Operator
Work & Service Contracts Public-PrivatePartnerships
BEST VALUE DESIGN BUILD
15
RFQ RFPShortlist InterviewPublic
Opening/Selection
Technical Proposal& Cost
Proposal
Confidential Pre-Proposal
Meetings
Info. Meeting
City DisburseStipend
Agreement
Interim Technical Submittal
Statement of
Confidential Potential Proposer Meetings
o
r
Confidential Proposer Meetings
Statement of Qualifications
ShortlistRFQ
6/17/19 8/22/19 10/1/19 Jan 2020 Feb 2020 Apr 2020 Aug 2020 Dec 2020Jul 2020
COLLABORATIVE DESIGN/BUILD PROCUREMENT
16
P R O P O S AL S R E C E IVE D AN D P R E L IMIN AR Y R E C O MME N D AT IO N
• Proposals from Three Shortlisted Teams− Goodwin:− KC Water Partners:− Kiewit:
• Evaluation Matrix reflects RFP Requirements✓Part 1. Project Plans/Management Approach (30 Points)✓Part 2. Technical Proposal (60 points)
✓Part 3. Construction Schedule, Planning, and Sequencing (10 points)
• Preliminary Bid Recommendation - Goodwin Brothers, highest ranked and $127M vs. $150M engineer’s estimate
17
DESIGN/BUILD PROCESS YIELDED.. .
Savings AND Innovative Design
18
DRIVING INNOVAT IONS
20
DRIVING INNOVATIONS
• Collaborative Project Delivery (Design/Build)• Building Information Model (BIM)• Ultimate sustainability captured in Envision -
energy recovery and beneficial use
• Approved financing - Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) ~1.5%
• Risk and asset management
Leadership
• Over 100 jobs for 23 local companies• Apprentice program and new technology
expands local workforce capacity• Class A biosolids and biogas provides
beneficial reuse opportunities• SMART BIM provides long-term management tool
Approach for Achieving Si lver or Higher Envision Rating
21
Quality of Life
• Narrated Virtual Tour provides educationaltool to showcase environment benefits
• New Biosolids Building provides safe environment for O&M staff
Approach for Achieving Si lver or Higher Envision Rating
22
Resource Allocation
• 95% reduction in sludge sent to landfill• Recycle 50% construction waste • Energy efficient system to save 46% on annual heating
costs• 50% energy needs supplied from on-site biogas• Translucent windows and skylights to enhance natural
lighting• Repurpose foundations and tanks to support new
processes
Natural World
• Minimizing need for additional land• Pervious pavement and bioswales improves water quality
Climate and Risk
• 10% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions• Achieves the Climate Look and Climate Resilience Strategy
DEFINING KC W ATER'S BIM PROGRAM• 3D-based design• Automated interference
detection• Design and constructability
reviews• Contractor schedule/budget
management, phasing scenarios
• Whole-life asset management
• Defined protocols for future BIM
23
DesignReview
Interference Detection
Analysis
Drawings & Schedules
Visualization
Specifications
Scheduling
Cost Estimating
B u i l d i n g I n f o r ma t i o n M o d e l ( B I M )
18
FINANCIAL PLANNING FOR PROJECT
"The City should include the pursuit of state and federal funds for water and wastewater infrastructure on its legislative agenda."
Approved on June 6, 2017
25
KC W ater Cost o f Service Task Force F inal Recommendat ions
• Applied for and received approval for $100 million in State Revolving Fund Subsidization for FY21.
• Projects receiving funding are to be financed in FY21, which ends September 30, 2021.
• Anticipated $12-$18 million in cost avoidance as a result of utilizing this funding.
26
CLEAN W ATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (CW SRF) F INANCING
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035NON-OCP (in millions) $196.70 $61.38 $91.20 $32.10 $38.74 $85.87 $15.19 $52.70 $8.08 $59.77 $8.23 $14.26 $7.50 $10.24 $32.18OCP (in millions) $72.33 $120.73 $73.52 $108.86 $80.38 $101.15 $178.55 $116.65 $38.23 $79.40 $56.56 $27.83 $26.85 $27.13 $27.42OCP as a % of WWCIP 28.3% 52.9% 44.1% 65.9% 58.7% 26.6% 83.5% 49.9% 28.6% 43.3% 61.3% 34.0% 38.9% 36.5% 23.4%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
Total Wastewater CIP 2021-2035, With Proposed 3rd Modification
2818
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
OCP (in millions) $72.33 $120.73 $73.52 $108.86 $80.38 $101.15 $178.55 $116.65 $38.23 $79.40 $56.56 $27.83 $26.85 $27.13 $27.42
NON-OCP (in millions) $196.70 $61.38 $91.20 $32.10 $38.74 $85.87 $15.19 $52.70 $8.08 $59.77 $8.23 $14.26 $7.50 $10.24 $32.18
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
Total Wastewater CIP 2021-2035, With Proposed 3 rd Modification
NON-OCP (in millions) OCP (in millions)
2918
EQUIPMENT AND SKILLED T RADES
EQUIPMENT AND SKILLED TRADESEquipmentBoilersCooling towersHVACElectrical MCC and switchgearCentrifugesPumpsChemical feedOdor control
31
TradesBoilermakerCarpenterElectricianFlatworkLinemenElevator mechanicHeavy equipment operatorIronworkerProgramming/I&C
LaborerMasonPile driverPlumberPipefitterSheet metal workerPainter/finisherMechanical Worker
18
MINORIT Y AND W OMEN'S BUSINESS
ENT ERPRISES
MINORITY AND W OMEN BUSINESS PARTICIPATION
KC Water obtained approval to use KCMO’s MBE/WBE Program.1. As far as we know, first time for the State.2. Drives more funding to local firms.
Typically, the State Revolving Fund (SRF) utilizes the State’s Disadvantaged Business Entities (DBE) Program.
33
MBE (11.9% Estimate, 11% Goal)*• WITEC $9,650,000• Blue Nile $ 750,000• Pro Metals $2,595,600• Vazquez Commercial $1,365,984• DuBois Consultants $ 407,780• Custom Engineering $ 185,354• TSI Geotechnical $ 34,063• Taliaferro & Browne $ 118,140
WBE (8.2% Estimate, 8% Goal)*• EAE (Designer) $ 272,293• Realm Construction $2,540,000• Richardson Hauling $ 100,000• Little Joe’s Asphalt $ 60,000• Cornell Roofing $ 150,000• A K Lee $1,500,000• American Fire Sprinkler $ 210,000• KC Electrical (Supplier) $ 850,000• Trekk Design Group $ 167,740• CJ Industries $4,900,000
34
*Contractor Utilization Plan approved by HRD on September 11, 2020.M/WBE design firms on Owner's Advisor Team that joined Goodwin Team
M/W BE PARTNERS AND GOALS ($26 M)
PROJECT URGENCY AND DRAFT
ORDINANCE LANGUGE
36
PROJECT SCHEDULE URGENCY✓ Need reliable sludge disposal method 24/7 for permit compliance
o Incinerators shut down permanentlyo Landfills not viable option
✓ Good pricing, even despite global pandemic✓ Biosolids project moved up and included in proposed 3rd
modification to Consent Decree✓ Sustainable project
o Recover resourceso Reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
✓ SRF loan approved and should close in First Quarter 2021, avoiding $12 – 18 million in debt-financing cost
Would like to request advance if possible with November holiday
Estimating revenue in the amount of $100,000,000.00 in the 2021A SRF Sewer Revenue Bond Fund and appropriating the same; appropriating $52,750,000.00 from the Unappropriated Fund Balance of the Sewer Fund; authorizing a $127,000,000.00 Design-Build contract with Goodwin Bros. Construction Co., for the Blue River WWTP Biosolids Facility Project, authorizing a maximum expenditure of $140,000,000.00; authorizing a $5,170,000.00 Design Professional Services Amendment No. 3 plus additional future amendments totaling $6,830,000.00 and authorizing an extension of the term of Contract No. 1394 with Carollo Engineering, Inc. for an additional 5 years without further City Council approval for a total contract amount of $20,547,902.77; authorizing a $375,000.00 Professional, Specialized or Technical Services contract with Kiewit Power Constructors Co. for Blue River WWTP Biosolids Facility Project; authorizing a $375,000.00 Professional, Specialized or Technical Services contract with KC Water Partners for Blue River WWTP Biosolids Facility Project; declaring the intent of the City to reimburse itself from the bond proceeds for certain expenditures; and designating requisitioning authority.
37
Draft Ord inance Language, to LUSI 10/20 fo r 11 /5 In troduc t ion , 11 /10 TIO
THANK YOUFor more information, contact: Matt Bond, [email protected]