key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: final evaluation results
DESCRIPTION
Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results. Center for Tobacco Policy Research Saint Louis University School of Public Health Douglas Luke, PhD Lisa Hepp, BS. Project Team. Saint Louis University Lisa Hepp, BS Douglas Luke, PhD - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation
results
Center for Tobacco Policy Research
Saint Louis University School of Public Health
Douglas Luke, PhD
Lisa Hepp, BS
![Page 2: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Project Team
Saint Louis University Lisa Hepp, BS Douglas Luke, PhD Stephanie Herbers,BS Nancy Mueller, MPH Melissa Krauss, MPH Angela Recktenwald,
BA Patricia Lindsey, MS Ross Brownson, PhD
MO Department of Health & Senior Services Janet Wilson, PhD
Funded by Legacy and the CDC Foundation
![Page 3: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Presentation OverviewGoal: Present the most interesting early
results from a three year multi-state tobacco program evaluation
Highlighted Results:• Best Practices• Disparate populations• Financial & political climate• Inter-agency relationships
![Page 4: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project Background:Best Practices Process Evaluation
• Project Aims• Develop a comprehensive picture of a state’s
tobacco control program for tobacco control partners and policymakers
• Examine the effects of financial, political, and organizational factors on tobacco control programs
• Understand how states are utilizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs (BP)
![Page 5: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Project Background:Conceptual Model
The Best Practices
TC Program Goals
Organizational Capacity &
Network
Resources
ActivitiesFacilitating Conditions Planning
Political Climate
Financial Climate
Disparate Populations
![Page 6: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Project Background:Participating States
• 10 states evaluated (2002-2003)– Washington– Oklahoma– Indiana– Wyoming– New York– Michigan– Pennsylvania– Mississippi– Hawaii– Missouri
![Page 7: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Best Practices (BP)
• How are the CDC Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs guidelines being implemented by states?
![Page 8: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Best Practices:Reorganization of BP
• Oklahoma’s Four Cornerstones – Community– Counter-Marketing– Classroom– Cessation
• Indiana– Community programs include cessation, school,
and statewide programs
• New York– Three main strategies for programmatic activities
• Community mobilization• Media• Cessation
![Page 9: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Best Practices: BP Priority Categories
![Page 10: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Best Practices: State Funding by BP Category
![Page 11: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Best Practices: Summary
• States are tailoring the BP to meet their needs
• Community programs and counter-marketing are high priorities & receive more funding
• Chronic disease programs are difficult to incorporate
• States want more “how to” guidance
![Page 12: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Tobacco-related Disparities
• Which groups are states identifying as having disparities related to tobacco use?
![Page 13: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Disparities: Categories of Priority Populations
![Page 14: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Disparities: States’ Priority Populations
• Minorities– African Americans– Native Americans– Latino/Hispanics– SE Asians– Native Hawaiians– Communities of Color
• Low SES– Blue-collar workers– Pregnant women– Rural– Medicaid beneficiaries
• Youth– White females– Private schools
• Pregnant Women• Other
– Persons w/ mental illness– Male smokeless tobacco
users– Rural communities
![Page 15: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Disparities: Resources Used in Identifying DP
![Page 16: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Disparities: Approaches to Addressing DP
• Establishing partnerships with existing local organizations
• Supporting new local organizations and coalitions
• Obtaining specific grant initiatives (e.g. ethnic networks)
• Organizing population-specific events (e.g. youth summits)
• Targeting counter-marketing campaigns
![Page 17: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Disparities: Summary
• States vary in terms of:– Defining “disparity”
– Identifying which strategies will work best to address specific populations
• Frequently mentioned lack of resources and guidance
![Page 18: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Financial and Political Climate
• What is the interrelationship of states’ financial and political climates?
![Page 19: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Tobacco Settlement
Funds as a % of CDC Lower Recommendations
Indiana
Oklahoma
Michigan
WyomingNew York
WashingtonPennsylvania
Mississippi
200%0% 50% 100% 150%
Source: Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
Hawaii
![Page 20: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Financial Climate: Strengths and Challenges
• Dedication of MSA dollars to tobacco control
• Trust fund
• Cigarette excise tax increase
• Securitization
• State budget shortfalls
![Page 21: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Political Climate: Champions and Barriers
Political Champions• Legislators• Attorney General• Governor• Health Department
Director• Voluntary Agencies• Other Organizations
Political Barriers• Tobacco Industry
presence• Preemption• Lack of political
support • Pro-tobacco norm
![Page 22: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Financial & Political Climate: Rating Variables
Financial Climate Political Climate% of TC budget meeting
CDC lower recommendation
Climate regarding TC
Per capita spending Major TC champions
FY 03 Excise Tax Governor support level
Securitization Legislature support level
— Industry presence
![Page 23: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Financial & Political Climate: State Comparison Summary
StatePolitical
Support Financial Support
Total
IN Very strong Strong +5
MS Very strong Strong +4
HI Strong Very Strong +4
PA Moderate Strong +2
WA Strong Moderate 0
NY Moderate Moderate -1
WY Challenging Strong -3
MI Challenging Moderate -3
OK Challenging Challenging -5
![Page 24: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Inter-agency Relationships
• Do inter-agency relationships reflect states’ financial and political climates?
![Page 25: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Contact Network: Strong FP Climate
Indiana
(Centrality Index 22.7%)
Mississippi
(Centrality Index 20.5%)
![Page 26: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Contact Network: Challenging FP Climate
Michigan
(Centrality Index 10.4%)
Oklahoma
(Centrality Index 6.6%)
![Page 27: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Financial, Political & Inter-agency: Summary
• Political and Financial Climates are closely related
• Climates may affect how agencies are working with each other
• Importance of political champions
• Qualitative advocacy approach
![Page 28: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Inter-agency Relationships Key Points
• Competent, knowledgeable, and supportive lead agencies are critical due to their strong influence on the network
• Geographic dispersion of a network influences communication among agencies
• Improving organizational structures and relationships could improve program efficiency
• Investigating networks can help shed light on the highly complex process of coordinating tobacco control programs
![Page 29: Key characteristics of state tobacco control programs: Final evaluation results](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070416/568151d8550346895dc012e8/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Conclusions
• State tobacco control programs are large, complex inter-organizational entities
• Evaluation is just starting to move beyond counting activities– Important to look at state strategies and polices– Important to examine inter-organizational characteristics
• Evaluation needs to be continued to examine the effects of state budget crises on tobacco control programs
E-mail: [email protected]://repositories.cdlib.org/tc/surveys