key media concepts

2
Key Media Concepts/Theory’s Genre David Buckingham (1993)Argues that ‘genre is not simply given “given” by the culture: rather, it is in a constant process of negotiation and change’. Claude Levi-Strauss (1958) Ideas about narrative amount to the fact that he believed all stories operated to certain clear Binary Opposites e.g. rich vs. poor. Steve Neale (1995) “Genres are processes of systemisation” – they change over time. Christian Metz (1994) argued that genres go through a cycle of changes during their lifetime. Barthes (1997) suggested that narrative works with five different codes and the enigma code works to keep up setting problems or puzzles for the audience. His action code ( a look, significant word, movement) is based on our cultural and stereotypical understanding of actions that act as a shorthand to advancing the narrative. Pam Cook (1985) “Linearity of cause and effect within an overall trajectory of enigma resolution”. A high degree of narrative closure. A fictional world that contains verisimilitude especially governed by spatial and temporal coherence. Representation Charles Sanders Peirce (1993) “ we think only in signs” David Gauntlett (2007) argues that “Identity is complicated. Everybody thinks they’ve got one. Artists play with the idea of identity in modern society. Baudrillard discussed the concept of hyperreality we inhabit a society that is no longer made up of any original thing for a sign that is now the meaning. He argued that we live in a society of simulacra simulations of reality that replace the real. Media Language Andrew Goodwin - Thought Beats

Upload: electricdreams1

Post on 03-Jul-2015

78 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Key media concepts

Key Media Concepts/Theory’s

Genre David Buckingham (1993)– Argues that ‘genre is not simply given “given” by the culture: rather, it is in a constant process of negotiation and change’. Claude Levi-Strauss (1958) – Ideas about narrative amount to the fact that he believed all stories operated to certain clear Binary Opposites e.g. rich vs. poor. Steve Neale (1995) – “Genres are processes of systemisation” – they change over time. Christian Metz (1994) – argued that genres go through a cycle of changes during their lifetime. Barthes (1997) – suggested that narrative works with five different codes and the enigma code works to keep up setting problems or puzzles for the audience. His action code ( a look, significant word, movement) is based on our cultural and stereotypical understanding of actions that act as a shorthand to advancing the narrative. Pam Cook (1985) – “Linearity of cause and effect within an overall trajectory of enigma resolution”. A high degree of narrative closure. A fictional world that contains verisimilitude especially governed by spatial and temporal coherence. Representation Charles Sanders Peirce (1993) – “ we think only in signs” David Gauntlett (2007) – argues that “Identity is complicated. Everybody thinks they’ve got one. Artists play with the idea of identity in modern society. Baudrillard – discussed the concept of hyperreality – we inhabit a society that is no longer made up of any original thing for a sign that is now the meaning. He argued that we live in a society of simulacra – simulations of reality that replace the real. Media Language Andrew Goodwin –

- Thought Beats

Page 2: Key media concepts

- Narrative and Performance (repeatability) - Star Image ( also Dyer) - Relation of visuals to a song ( illustration, amplification,

disjuncture) - Technical aspects( Camera, editing, effects etc.) Carol Vernallis – Vernallis’ theory centres around four key concepts that all relate to the way the music video is constructed (how it creates meaning). They are: 1. Narrative 2. 2.Editing 3. Camera movement and framing 4. Diegesis Audience Mass/Niche & Mainstream/Alternative Stuart Hall (1980) – analysed the readings within audiences as either: 1. Dominant or Preferred Reading: The meaning they

want you to have is usually accepted. 2. Negotiated Reading: The dominant reading is only

partially recognised or accepted and audiences might disagree with some of it or find their own meanings.

3. Oppositional Reading: The dominant reading is refused, rejected because the reader disagrees with it or is offended by it, especially for political, religious, feminist, reasons etc.

John Hartley (1987) – “institutions are obliged not to only speak about an audience, but – crucially, for them – to talk to one as well; they need not only to represent audiences but to enter into relation with them. McQuail (1972) – An audience can be described as a “temporary collective” Ien Ang (1991) –“Audiences only exist as an imaginary entity, an abstraction, constructed from the vantage point of the institution, in the interest of the institution”.