key technologies and challenges in pre-clinical biologics ... · phage display (cxcr2 mpls) screen...
TRANSCRIPT
Key technologies and challenges in pre-clinical biologics drug discovery
Andrew BuchananEMI Training Event 4thApril 2017
From Discover to DevelopmentA simple paradigm…
2
• First select the right candidate molecule!
Isolate
candidate
drug
Manufacture
candidate
drug
Find
patient
Put product in
patientNew Medicine
mAb Platform TechnologiesStructural features of mAbs
Fab
Fc
Fv
CDR’sComplementary determining region
Range of Biologic’s formatBispecific Antibodies
Antibody Drug ConjugatemAb Fragments
Peptide fusionsPeptide conjugates
mAb Platform TechnologiesLarge libraries of human antibodies
5
non-immunised
humans, 7-70 yrs
Isolated B cells
VH and VL genes
assembledCloning
VH and VL genes
amplified PCR
Vaughan et al (1996) Nature BioTechnology
Lloyd et al, 2008 PEDS
mAb Platform TechnologiesIn vitro large libraries of human antibodies
6
Display Technology for mAbs
• Very high affinity requirement (<10 pM)
• Antigen highly conserved between species
• Toxic or poorly immunogenic
• Over 40 clinical and preclinical therapeutic
antibodies, including adalimumab (Humira®) and
belimumab (Benlysta®)
mAb Platform TechnologiesIn vivo animal immunisation
7
Immunisation Extract B cells from
lymph nodes & spleen
Fuse with myeloma cells
Screen and select
hybridomasHybridoma for mAbs
• First in class – early lead
• Complex cell surface targets (GPCR’s, ion channels)
• Over 13 approved therapeutic mAbs
Candidate Drug Target Profile
8
Target What do I want to bind?
Specificity Do I want it to bind anything else?
Format What will the antibody look like?
Species cross reactivity What species do I need to cross react with?
Potency What effect do I want my antibody to have and how will I measure it?
Affinity How will I know when it is good enough?
Developability Does it have good biophysical stability, expression and PK characteristics?
Lead Isolation: Case Study
9
Case Study: CXCR2
Target
Class A GPCR
Activated by the binding of a number of CXC chemokines with the conserved ELR
sequence motif
Goal: Generate CXCR2 antagonistic antibodies
Challenges for antibody discovery: Small extracellular regions, poor expression
and unstable in purified form
Rossant MAbs. 2014;6(6):1425-38
Approaches for Isolation of CXCR2 antibodies
11
Immunisation
– Immunisation of mice with HEK cells over-expressing human
CXCR2 (> 1x105/cell)
Phage Display
– Magnetic proteoliposomes (MPLs) ensure CXCR2 is:
• In the correct orientation
• Pure
• Highly concentrated
MagneticBead
CXCR2
LipidMembrane
Antibody
12
Anti-CXCR2 mAb Functional Assay Cascade
Phage Display(CXCR2 MPLs)
Screen CXCR2 v CXCR3 binding(FMAT)
Primary screen for functionIL-18 competition binding assay (FMAT)
Leads
Secondary screen for functionInhibition of IL-18 or Gro-(TANGO arrestin assay)
Specific Antibodies
Potent, species cross reactive antibodies
Mouse Immunization(HEK-CXCR2 cells)
1373
93
5
70
9,800
303
1
3
1,536
1% binding mAbswere functional
13
Anti-CXCR2 mAb Functional Assay Cascade
Phage Display(CXCR2 MPLs)
Screen CXCR2 v CXCR3 binding(FMAT)
Primary screen for functionIL-18 competition binding assay (FMAT)
Leads
Secondary screen for functionInhibition of IL-18 or Gro-(TANGO arrestin assay)
Specific Antibodies
Potent, species cross reactive antibodies
Mouse Immunization(HEK-CXCR2 cells)
1373
93
5
70
9,800
303
1
3
1,536mAb IL-18
IC50 (nM)
Gro-α
IC50 (nM)
X-1 2.2 3.8
X-2 1.6 6.2
X-3 0.5 1.1
X-4 0.08 0.07
HY 0.2 0.4
14
How can antibodies inhibit?Determining mechanism of action
Competitive Allosteric
Antibodies with distinct modes of action identified from different lead isolation approaches
15
Hybridoma derived antibody
Antagonist
Phage display derived antibody
Allosteric modulator
X-3HY
Target What do I want to bind?
Specificity Do I want it to bind anything else?
Format What will the antibody look like?
Species cross reactivity What species do I need to cross react with?
Potency What effect do I want my antibody to have and how will I measure it?
Affinity How will I know when it is good enough?
Developability Does it have good biophysical stability, expression and PK characteristics?
16
Status at end of Lead Isolation
✓
✓
✓
✓
Lead Optimisation: Case Study
17
Fc
Fv
Why do we want high affinity antibody drug candidates?
18
• To meet the needs of patients
and physicians
– High affinity to engage target
over prolonged periods
– Minimise dose required
• Target 100 pM affinity
Minter et al. 2013 BJP 168:200
Anti-GM-CSF Receptor for Rheumatoid Arthritis
See Figure 1 in
19
Affinity Maturation Platforms
Parsimonious Mutagenesis
• Single-point mutations for screening
• Combine all improved AA changes
Block Mutagenesis:
Library based approach
Target multiple CDR positions
20
Screening for improved affinity and potency
See phase II progress in Burmester et al. 2017 Ann
Rhem Dis 0:1-11
GM-CSF R
mAb
Affinity Shape change IC50
Parent 71 nM -
547D04 29 pM 41 pM
VH VL
DevelopabilityCritical to ensure the desired formulation, PK and exposure
21
Dobson et al. Sci Reports 2016 6:38644
SEC-HPLC
Single dose rat PK
mAb IHC on normal human tissue
Candidate Drug Target Profile
22
Summary
23
• Key features of mAbs and the range of formats
• The use of a Candidate Drug Target Profile as a guide
• Case studies of lead isolation and optimisation:
– Power of combining antibody platform and functional screening
• Importance of ‘developability’ for clinical development
Confidentiality Notice
This file is private and may contain confidential and proprietary information. If you have received this file in error, please notify us and remove
it from your system and note that you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of the
contents of this file is not permitted and may be unlawful. AstraZeneca PLC, 2 Kingdom Street, London, W2 6BD, UK, T: +44(0)20 7604 8000,
F: +44 (0)20 7604 8151, www.astrazeneca.com
24
Scenario’s: What would you do?
Ligand or Receptor
Species of interest
Human specific
KD 100 nM
mAb aggregates
ADA response
Can’t reproduce published data
Short T1/2