keynote address - amre moussa

Upload: valeriobrl

Post on 07-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Keynote Address - Amre Moussa

    1/2

    1

    Check against deliveryGeneva 9 September 2011

    Keynote speech by

    Mr. Amre Moussa,

    Former Arab League Secretary-General,

    Former Foreign Minister of Egypt

    To the annual conference of the

    International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS)

    9 September 2011

    Thank you very much for inviting me to address the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) annual

    conference in Geneva which is an opportunity for me to meet this esteemed audience at a very exceptional

    juncture.

    The first point that comes to my mind as a speaker is that we meet today two days before the commemoration of

    the sad events of 11 September 2001, it will be a decade ago shortly when a heinous act of terrorism was

    committed leading to a bloody decade of confrontation and wars as well as to policies based on doubtful and

    unsubstantiated theories such as the Clash of Civilizations and the End of History.

    This criminal act left all of us, regardless of nationality, geography, religion, color or creed, in rage, in shame and

    in disbelief. Disbelief despite that it was live on air from the outset to the end.

    Few years earlier before 9/11 there were celebrations around the world marking the end of the cold war and the

    demise of the Soviet Union. We should also recall that in October 1991 the Madrid conference for peace in the

    Middle East was held and produced a chain of negotiations and the recognition of the Principle of Land for Peace.

    The world at large and the Middle East in particular was full of hope that a new era of justice and prosperity for all

    would emerge and a new international order.a different world order would be established and the world would

    be heading to a better future.

    Unfortunately this did not happen. It continued to be business as usual. Double standards formed the basis for

    many policies and remained one of the preferred international practices. The clash of civilizations, with special

    reference to Islam became a leading world stage line of policy. Major conflicts and issues such as the Arab/Israeli

    conflict were placed on the backburner of a train going nowhere. The developing nations with a very few

    exceptions remained far behind, especially in Africa. In other words no change was visible which led to further

    frustration and for sentiments of despair to prevail. Questions were raised about the direction of the world, would

    this indeed be the end of history? In other words is what we see is what we get forever. Could anybody, any

    people accept this?

    This certainly created bitter feelings in many parts of the world especially in the Middle East.

    Having said that I would like to quickly say that the atmosphere of despair and frustration in the Middle East and

    in particular in the Arab world could not and should not be connected to the international causes alone. In fact, the

    Arab people were enraged, accumulating anger and feelings of rejection because of the policies pursued by the

    so called elected leaders, elected time and again through fraud. The misrule, the dictatorial rule, the introduction

    of ruling family aspirations to perpetuate dynasties, consolidate hegemonies and strengthen their grip on power,

    in addition to the gathering of enormous wealth triggered the opposition then the uprising, then the revolution of

    the people against those rulers. People went to the streets in an unprecedented move in the Arab world to topple

    those rulers and put an end to those regimes.

    They could not accept anymore to be robbed of their present and future by such regimes, insulted and humiliated

    by those unacceptable policies.

  • 8/4/2019 Keynote Address - Amre Moussa

    2/2

    2

    Change was a must and it was time for change. In fact many world powers expected and wanted a change. Some

    of them went further to force that change within certain parameters.

    The greater Middle East was one of those plans for change which meant inter-alia to prepare the ground for the

    era post the demise of the dictators.

    In fact, the big powers enjoyed the full cooperation of many of those leaders and became good friends; howeverthose very leaders were fully rejected by their people.

    So the careful handling by some big powers for a change under their auspices coincided with the brave drive by

    the people in several Arab countries to take the matters in their hands. Revolution occurred and succeeded by the

    people and for the people, oblivious of any foreign plans or interests.

    Hence, what we are witnessing today has no relation to the plans put forward under whatever banner including in

    particular the policy of propagating a greater and broader Middle East. Let me tell you that instead of a greater

    Middle East you will have a vigorous Arab world in the years to come. This will be good for a safer future for the

    Middle East .and redrawn by its people and the effect of their political landscape.

    The changes in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Syria and Libya were genuine, and the change will affect the whole

    region. Perhaps in different degrees with different approaches but all shall fall within the parameters of change in

    the Arab world. Therefore we shall see a different Middle East in the next few months and years.

    In this connection three elements are to be highlighted:

    1-Successful popular uprisings in the Arab region want their countries to follow engaging, forthcoming and

    productive policies that would produce a better region which is peaceful and prosperous.

    2-There will be a steady policy towards a new Arab paradigm of more coordination and cooperation, not the

    contrary.

    3-In this connection striving for a fair peace in the Middle East and putting an end to the Arab/Israeli conflict shall

    continue to enjoy high priority on the Arab agenda. We shall continue to abide by the Arab peace initiative of

    2002.

    The new revolutionary regimes would be more anxious to reach a fair peace in the Middle East. I see this as avery positive point. In fact the total submission of previous regimes has led nowhere. Those policies were empty

    and added to the rage of the people. The time has come for a result oriented peace process.

    Time has come for many policy makers around the world to take the new Arab world more seriously; this new

    Arab world will be soon in the making, sooner than expected.

    I see a new Arab world, vigorous, young, demanding, in a state of production, friendly to the world including the

    West but not in a state of defeat or submission. The young generation, representing the trigger for the new

    regimes, need peace and justice and development to prevail. They will have good relations with all those who

    would help them and those who would present to them genuine help towards achieving their goals.

    A win-win situation is what we together should work for. No other formula would succeed.

    Additional points

    -The need to solve the Palestinian question.

    -The role of the new Arab League to cope with the new era of Arab revolutions

    -Its role in Libya and Syria

    -The developments in Egypt

    -The new world order and its need for a new Arab world