khushi final ppt

8/3/2019 Khushi Final Ppt

1/40

AA

SURVEY ONSURVEY ON

TEAM MANAGEMENTTEAM MANAGEMENTPREPARED BY:

SHRUT ADANI - HRM:A01DALIAH RODRIGUES - HRM A:08

KHUSHBU SANGHAVI-HRM:A26

1


2/40

Dependent Variable: Team Management/Responses

Independent variable : - Gender

- Age

- Work Experience

- Designation

Sector : Information Technology

Companies : Wipro, L&T, Infosys, Syntel, P & B Planet Company

Scoring:

Option Score Assigned

Always 5

Usually 4Sometimes 3

Seldom 2

Never 1

2PERFORMANCEOF TEAMMANAGEMENT


3/40

Graphical Presentation of:

1. Age & Designation

2. Work Experience & Designation3. Response on Team Management V/S

-Age

- Gender

-Work Experience

- Designation



4/40

Comparison of Respondents on theComparison of Respondents on the

basis of Genderbasis of Gender

Male 77.00%

Female 23.00%



5/40

Dependent Variable DataDependent Variable Data

Categories Class Frequency %

GoodTeam Management 20-46 0 0

Fair Team Management 47-73 21 34.42

Poor Team Management 74-100 40 65.57

5PERFORMANCE OF TEAMMANAGEMENT


6/40

Age & DesignationAge & DesignationAge

(years)

Designation

Engineer Group Leader Senior

Developer

Technician Trainee Total

20-2520 1 4 3 6 34

26-309 4 8 2 0 23

>300 3 1 0 0 4

Majority of respondents :Engineers

within the age group of20-25 years

i.e. 33%

Trainees : < 25 years

0

510

15

20

25

30

35

Engineer GroupLeader

SeniorDeveloper

Technician Trainee

Age

Designation

>30 26-30 20-25



7/40

Age Designation

Engineer

Group

Leader

Senior

Developer Technician Trainee Total %

20-25 33% 2% 7% 5% 10% 57%

26-30 15% 6% 13% 3% 0 37%

>30 0 5% 2% 0 0 7%

Total 48% 13% 21% 8% 10% 100



8/40

Work Experience & DesignationWork Experience & DesignationWork

Experience

(years)

Designation

Engineer Group

Leader

Senior

Developer


10 0 1 0 0 0 1

Total 29 8 13 5 6 61

02468

101214

Work

experience

Designation

>1 1 to 3 3 to 5 5 to 7 8 to 10 >10

Engineers with 1-3 years work

experience: 25% response to

good team management.

Group Leaders & Senior

Developers with 3-7 years work

experience: 5% response to team

management.



9/40

Work experience Designation

Engineer

Group

Leader

Senior

Developer Technician Trainee %

less than 1year 11% 0 0 0 5% 16%

1-3years 21% 2% 1% 7% 5% 36%

3-5years 13% 1% 13% 2% 0 30%

5-8years 2% 8% 5% 0 0 15%

8-10years 0 0 2% 0 0 2%

more than 10years 0 2% 0 0 0 1%

Total 48% 13% 21% 9% 10% 100



10/40

Team Management & GenderTeam Management & Gender

Categories Class Gender

Male Female Total

Poor Team Management 20-46 0 0 0

Fair Team management 47-73 15 6 21

Good Team Management 74-100 32 8 40

Total 47 14 61

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Male Female

TeamM

anagement

Gender

20-46 47-73 74-100 Male team members are

good managers.

Females are fair team

mangers because of less

ratio.



11/40


Male % Female %Total %

Poor Team Managers 20-460 0 0

Fair Team Managers 47-73 25 10 34

Good Team Managers 74-10052 13 66

Total77 23 100



12/40

Team Management & AgeTeam Management & AgeCategories Class Age (years)

20-25 26-30 >30 Total

Poor Team Management 20-460 0 0 0

Fair Team management 47-7317 3 1 21

Good Team Management 74-10017 20 3 40

Total34 23 4 61

0

20

40

20-25years

26-30 years

>30 years

TeamManagement

Age

20-25 years (age): 30% response to fair

team management

26-30 years(age):35% response to good

team management.

>30years(age): poor team management.



13/40

Categories Class Age20-25years 26-30 years Total

Poor Team Managers 20-46 0 % 0 % 0

Fair Team Managers 47-73 28 % 5 % 34 %

Good Team Managers 74-100 28 % 33 % 66 %

Total 56 % 38 % 100 %



14/40

Team Management &Work ExperienceTeam Management &Work ExperienceCategories Class Work Experience (years)

10 Total

Poor Team

Management

20-46

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fair Team

management

47-73

6 9 4 1 1 0 21

Good Team

Management

74-100

4 13 14 8 0 1 40

Total 10 22 18 9 1 1 61

0

5

10

15

T

eam

Mana

gement

Work Experience

Poor TeamManagers 20-46

Fair Team

Managers 47-73Good TeamManagers 74-100

3-5 years work

experience: 25%

response to good

team management.

>5 years work

experience: fair

team management.



15/40

Categories Class Work Experience

10years Total

Poor Team

Managers

20-46

0 % 0 % 0 0 0 0

Fair Team

Managers

47-73

10 % 15 % 2 % 2% 0 34 %

Good Team

Managers

74-100

7 % 21 % 13 % 0 2% 66 %

Total 16 % 36 % 15 % 2 % 2% 100



16/40

Team Management &Team Management &

DesignationDesignationCategories Class

Designation

Engineer Group

Leader

Senior

Developer


Poor Team

Management

20-46

0 0 0 0 0 0

Fair Team

management

47-73

6 1 6 2 6 21

Good TeamManagement 74-100 23 7 7 3 0 40

Total 29 8 13 5 6 61

05

1015202530

TeamManagement

Designation

Good Team Managers 74-100

Fair Team Managers 47-73

Poor Team Managers 20-46

Engineers: 40% response ongood team management.

Technicians: 3% response on

good team management.



17/40

Categories Class Designation

Engineer

Group

Leader Technician Trainee Total

Poor Team

Managers

20-46

0 0 0 0 0

Fair Team Managers 47-73

10 % 2 % 3 % 10 % 34 %

Good TeamManagers 74-100

38 % 11 % 5% 0 66 %

Total48 % 13 % 8 % 10 % 100



18/40

TESTING OF HYPOTHESISTESTING OF HYPOTHESIS

y A) Chi Square (G2)= Categorical Data

y B) Correlation (r) = Continuous Data

y C) Average Responses V/S Performance

on Team Management

y D) Case Study



19/40

ChiChi Square (Square (GG22))

1. Team Management Performance

& Gender:


Male Female Total

Fair Team

management

47-73

15 6 21

Good TeamManagement 74-100 32 8 40

Total 47 14 61



20/40

y Null Hypothesis: There is no association between TeamManagement Performance & Gender

y G2 cal = 0.58y G2 tab = 3.841

y Conclusion: G2 cal (0.58) < G2 tab (3.841) . Therefore,Hypothesis is accepted.

y Interpretation:

- Gender has no association with Performance of Team

- Young professionals have ample of knowledge of latesttechnology and so gender does not affect a performance of ateam.

- Subsequently, in a good team mgmt there are seniorprofessionals, male or female, dont have knowledge of newlatest technology but still they have that much ability tohandle the whole team as a one.



21/40

2.Team Management Performance &Age:

Categories Class Age (years)

20-25 26-30 >30 Total

Fair Team

management

47-73

17 3 1 21

Good Team

Management

74-100

17 20 3 40

Total34 23 4 61



22/40

y Null Hypothesis: There is no association between TeamManagement Performance & Age

y G2 cal = 8.4641y G2 tab = 5.991

y Conclusion : G2 cal (8.4641) > G2

tab (5.991).ThereforeHypothesis is rejected

y Interpretation:

- Age of the Team members affects the performance of team.

- Between the ages of 20-25 years normally a person is graduatedand they seldom get chance to take decisions and are sometimesunable to tackle various situations which senior employees can

handle easily from their past experience.- Moreover as and when the age increases the knowledge and

qualification comes up to mark which increases the level of aperformance of a team.



23/40

3.Team Management

Performance & Work

Experience:

Categories Class Work Experience (years)

10 Total

Fair Team

management

47-73

6 9 4 1 1 0 21

Good Team

Management

74-100

4 13 14 8 0 1 40

Total10 22 18 9 1 1 61



24/40

y Null Hypothesis: There is no association of WorkExperience on Team Management Performance.

y G2 cal = 7.86y G2 tab =9.48

y Conclusion :G2 cal (7.86)< G2

tab (9.48). Thereforehypothesis is accepted

y Interpretation:

- There is no association of Work Experience on TeamManagement Performance.

- The matter which should be considered is whether the

employee is capable to bring the team mgmtperformance to another high level or not.

- Sometimes a fresher becomes a reason for a good teammgmt performance which another employee of moreexperienced is never been able to bring.



25/40

4. Team Management

Performance & Designation:

Categories Class Designation

Engineer Group

Leader

Senior

Developer


Fair Team

management

47-73

6 1 6 2 6 21

Good Team

Management

74-100

23 7 7 3 0 40

Total

29 8 13 5 6 61



26/40

y Null Hypothesis: There is no association between TeamManagement Performance & Designation.

yG

2

cal = 23.91y G2 tab = 9.488

y Conclusion :G2 cal (23.91) > G2

tab (9.488). Thereforehypothesis is Rejected

y Interpretation:

- Performance of team management is affected by designationof its members

- Senior professionals are capable enough to boost the moraleof his juniors and the competition scenario of the current

corporate world has made the statement true that yes theperformance of a team mgmt is affected by designation.

- Whatever the team leader says has to be followed majorityof the times, so if the performance is good or bad, ability ofteam leader is only highlighted.



27/40

Correlation (r)Correlation (r)

1.Work Experience of leader and QuickDecision making:

y Null Hypothesis:Quick decision making (V1) has no

relationship with the work experience of the leader(V2).

y r Value: 0.1742

y Conclusion: Value(r) is


28/40

2.Experienced Leader and Skilled TeamLeader

y Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between Experienceof the leader and skill of team leader.

y r Value: 0.1929



29/40

3.Proper Planning and Stress

y Null Hypotheses: There is no relationship between properplanning and stress.

y r value: -0.055

y

Conclusion: Value(r) is


30/40

4.MonitorWork and Praise the Team

yNull Hypothesis: There is no relation between Monitoringwork (V1) and praising (V2) the team members.

y r Value: 0.0652

y

Conclusion: Value(r) is


31/40

5.Size of the Team and Duration of theProject.

y Null Hypothesis: There is no relation between size ofthe team (V1) and duration of the project (V2).

y r Value: 0.384



32/40

6.Designation and Communication

y Null Hypotheses: There is no relation betweendesignation and communication.

y r Value: -0.075



33/40

7.Appreciation and Stress Reduction

y

Null Hypothesis: There is no relationship betweenAppreciation and stress reduction.

y r Value: 0.285



34/40

8.WorkIndependently and Reduced Stress

y Null Hypotheses: Working independently (V1) has no relationship on stress

reduction(V2).

y r Value: 0.3597



35/40

Average Responses V/S PerformanceAverage Responses V/S Performance

on Team Managementon Team Management

y The average score for the question Good communicationis necessary to avoid dispute among members, was observedas the highest scored item (4.66) amongst all.

y The average score for the question Team leaders need tounderstand the strength of the team members beforeassigning the task was observed as the 2nd highest scoreditem(4.47) amongst all.

y Meaning out of all the 20 questions asked these 2 questionswas considered as most important by majority of therespondents and were responded as always.

y So, for a better O/P, it is necessary to understand thestrength of team members and a proper communicationwithin the team and with other coordinates is alsonecessary.

35

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM

MANAGEMENT


36/40

y The average score for the question If you are highly

skilled team leader, it does not matter who is in your

team, was observed as the least scored item (2.91)

amongst all.

y The average score for the question Designation of the

members of the team creates conflicts, was observed as

the 2nd least scored item (3.06) amongst all.

y Meaning out of all the 20 questions asked these 2 questions

were given the minimum weightage by majority of the

respondents and were responded as never.

y Thus, a good performance of the team depends on overall

contribution of all team members irrespective of Team

Leaders Skills and Designation of the members.

36

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM

MANAGEMENT


37/40

Case Study Response:Case Study Response:

1.75

1.8

1.85

1.9

1.95

2

2.05

Employers are

unethical

Firm is

breaking thecontract

Allow him to

workindependentlyfor better O/P

Adjust to be a

Team Player

Provide

Training to bea Team Player

Re

sponse

37

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM

MANAGEMENT


38/40

CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONFair Team Management:Age : 20-25years

Work Experience : 1-3 years

Designation : Engineers and Senior Developers

Recommendations :

- In age and work experience : Fair Management -> Good

Management

- Senior Developers : Show fair Management instead of GoodManagement

38

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM

MANAGEMENT


39/40

Good Team Management:

Age : 26-30years

Work Experience : 3-5years

Designation : Engineers

Recommendations :

- In Team Management : 5yrs of work experience-Work Independently

-Young Age : Healthy competition

: Enthusiastic

: Efficient: Technological changes

- Seniors : in Boredom -> O/P

39

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM

MANAGEMENT


40/40

Conclusion:Conclusion:

y Gender &Work Experience has no effect onTeam Management Performance.

y Age & Designation play a vital role on TeamManagement Performance.

y Team members should have a proper flow ofcommunication and they should be allowed towork independently.

y It is the duty of the Team Leader to understand

the strength of the team and then assign thework.

y Skill of a Team leader & Designation doesnot affect performance of the Team

40

PERFORMANCE OF TEAM

MANAGEMENT

khushi final ppt

Documents