KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

Claudia Marenco - Knowledge Management Officer

http://www.fch.europa.eu/

2 main aspects

Data collection

Once per year, for previouscalendar year

Annual programmereview

Culminating in Programmereview days (November)

= Structured capture of data and other knowledgecreated with FCH JU funding

FCH JU data collection

A lot if info is available but…• Not reported in centralised manner• Not reported in consistent manner

And a lot of info is not reported at all !

To have an overview of FCH JU achievementsTo decide the way forward

Gaps in knowledgeNew directions based on new informationNew calls for proposals.. New money…

To justify to the European Commission the money spent

Your role: provide data

OnlineFCH JU secure software

According to template questionnaires related to project content

(anonymised)data outputanalysis

Workflow

datavalidation

datadatainput

targets state-of-art

April-May

Data related toprevious year

Jan 1st – Dec. 31st

Why would you give us data?

1) Because you are grateful of thesupport received by the FCH JU

2) Because you have to !!Deliverables to be included in theDescription of Action (DoA)Every year

(Mar-April)

For Call 2017 projects:Starting in 2019

What data?

Data according to template questionnaire(s) related to thenature of the project.

22 existing template questionnaires:1 or more probably relevant to your project

APU demoCGH2 storage tankDiagnostics - electrolysisDiagnostics - fuel cellsEducationElectrolyser demonstrationElectrolyser research at stack levelElectrolyser research at system levelFC & plug-in car demoFC bus demoFC car demo

FC MHV demoFuel cell research at stack level or lowerFuel cell stack manufacturingFuel cells research at system levelHRS demoHRS researchH2 production demo (excl. electrolysis)H2 production res. (excl. electrolysis)mCHPPNRStationary, general

In practice

Project

Research object 1Template 1

Data provider 1

Research object 2Template 2

Data provider 2

Data provider 3

Research object 3Template 3

Data provider 4

…

1. The project is divided into research objects in agreement with its scopeEach research object is associated to a template questionnaire

2. For each research object, 1 or more data provider(s) is/are nominated bythe project coordinator to provide data

3. The data providers are contacted - receive weblink, credentials andinstruction to participate in the data collection in April-May

In practice: example

Research Object:STATION

Research Object:6 CARS OF BRAND B

Research Object:9 CARS OF BRAND A

Template: car Template: car Template: HRS

PROJECT

Data provider 3Data provider 2Data provider 1

Data provider 4

Example

PARAMETER Data providercomment

FCHJUcomment

Confidentialitylevel

Confidentiality

When you enter the data, there is the possibilityto mark the parameters as public or confidential

Confidential data may be aggregated withother comparable data received from otherprojects to produce anonymised output valuesfrom which it is not possible to workbackwards to obtain the original confidentialvalues

The FCH JU will never disclose any individualconfidential data without prior explicit consent ofthe coordinator (on behalf of the consortium)

Process

FCH JU consults coordinatorto nominate data provider(s)

for each research object

FCH JU sends link andcredentials to data

provider(s)

Data providers provide inputand submit

FCH JU checks

REJECTION

AUTHORISATION

Knowledge managementanalysis, aggregation, etc.

Typical reasons for rejection:• Data reported for wrong period

Correct period is 01 Jan – 31 Dec of previous year• Form is incomplete• Irrelevance of confidential labelling• Incorrect data

Aprilto

June

March

April

We look forward to your input

(Starting in April 2019)

MC(F)1

Slide 13

MC(F)1 MARENCO Claudia ( FCH ), 03/08/2017

FCH JU Programme Review

– Review of the FCH JU programme based on activeprojects

– Includes the event “Programme Review Days”• This year: 23-24 November, 2017, Brussels• Projects are asked to man a poster on progress vs

programme objectives• Selected projects give oral presentations

2017 projects• Active participation (poster,

presentation) from 2019• Attendance welcomed every

year

Programme Review Process

Mayto

Nov.

April

May

Request projects for information• Self-assessment & information for posters (template form(s)• Graphic files for posters

Projects: Docs submission

ProgrammeReview based on

projects’ self-assessment reports

Poster preparation

Agenda preparation in September:notification to projects selected

for oral presentation

Programme Review Days

Programme Review report incl. project posters

Nov

Feb

Bilateral meetings

Room

Project Managers Room / Office

AGUILO RULLAN Antonio 04/20A

BOILLOT Lionel 04/28

CALOPRISCO Pietro 04/20B

GARCIA HOMBRADOSAlberto

04/26

GIRON Enrique 04/30

LYMPEROPOULOS Nikolaos 04/15A

TSIMIS Dionisis 04/15B