knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological examinations amongst radiology department...
TRANSCRIPT
Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological examinations
amongst radiology department staff
AL Chang, LH Cope, DH Keane, S WoodPresented by Dr AL Chang at Royal College of Radiologists Audit Meeting 18 May 2015
2
Disclosures
• Work performed at Radiology department South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust (STFT)
• Current workplace – City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
3
4
Background
• The use of radiological investigations is an accepted part of medical practice justified in terms of clear clinical benefits to the patient, which should far outweigh the small radiation risks.
• However even small radiation doses are not entirely without risk. A small fraction of the genetic mutations and malignant diseases that occur in the population can be attributed to background radiation
5
• The Ionising radiation (Medical Exposure) regulations 2000 and 2006 (IR(ME)R) impose a responsibility on imaging departments to ensure that all exposures to ionising radiation are justified, and that doses are optimized. Organizations and individuals using ionising radiation must comply with these regulations.
6
Background
• Information available on internet• Heightened awareness of radiation exposure• iRefer available on intranet• Only a third of clinicians receive training in radiation
protection and the level of knowledge is low (Soye 2008)
• On 1 April 2009, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) assumed responsibility from the Healthcare Commission for the inspection and enforcement for incidents in England under Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000
7
• A single view chest x-ray gives an effective dose of 0.015mSv.
• This amounts to 2.5 days of background radiation
8
THE STANDARD
• All radiology department staff should have knowledge of the relevant radiation doses for common examinations
Target• 50% awareness of dose estimation per chest x-
ray equivalent
9
Process – Data collection
• Standard questionnaire (14 questions)
• To all staff in radiology department• Data collected over – First week November 2012– First week April 2014
• Number distributed– 1st round = 70 ; responders = 54 ( 77%)– 2nd round = 60 ; responders = 38 ( 63%)
10
Results- respondersAudit 1st round
(Nov 2012)2nd round (April 2014)
Responders N = 54 38Consultant radiologist 3 3Radiology SpR 0 2Radiographer 18 13Radiology assistant 9 6Radiology nurse 0 0Administrative staff 17 7Student 3 5Porter 4 2
11
Introductory question
• The IR(ME)R) regulations 2000 and 2006 impose a responsibility on imaging departments to ensure that exposures to the following imaging modalities are justified1. Plain x-rays2. Ultrasound scans3. Computed tomography imaging4. MRI scans5. Barium contrast studies6. All of the above
12
Introductory question
• The IR(ME)R regulations 2000 and 2006 impose a responsibility on imaging departments to ensure that exposures to the following imaging modalities are justified1. Plain x-rays2. Ultrasound scans3. Computed tomography imaging4. MRI scans5. Barium contrast studies6. All of the above
13
Results - dataIR(ME) R regulations 2000 & 2006
1st round 2nd round
Consultant radiologist 3/3 (100%) 3/3 (100%)
SpR radiology 2/2 (100%)
Radiographer 16/18 (89%) 12/13(92%)
Radiology assistant 7/9 (78%) 6/6(100%)
Admin Staff 4/17 (23%) 2/7(28%)
Student 4/4 (100%) 3/5(60%)
Porter 0/3 (0%) 0/2(0%)
14
Segment II of questionnaire
What is the equivalent dose in ‘chest x-rays’ for the following examinations ?
For example
The equivalent dose from a single view pelvis x-ray is 20 chest x-rays
15
AnswersApproximate Chest x-ray
equivalentExact valueiRefer 2012
Abdomen x-ray 50 30
Lumbar spine x-ray single lateral view
50 40
Ultrasound scan abdomen 0 0
MRI angiography 0 0
MRI brain 0 0
Barium Swallow 100 100
Isotope bone scan 200 200
CT brain 100 90
CT Chest 400 440
CT abdomen and pelvis 400 450
PET-CT body > 800 1200
iRefer – RCR 2012
16CT HEAD = approximate equivalent of 90 chest x-rays
17
What is the additional lifetime risk of inducing a fatal malignancy by performing ……
CT chest abdomen and pelvis 1:2 000
A Chest x-ray 1:1 000 000
18
Results
19
Consultant
Radiologist (3)
Radiographer
(18)
Radiology
assistant (9)
Admin staff (17)
Porter (3)
Student (4)
0 1 11
2
3 3 14 1 15 2 1 1 16 1 17 1 6 1 3 28 69 1 1
10 1 111 1 1 112 113
Don’t know
12
Consultant
Radiologist (3)
Spr radiology (2)
Radiographer (13)
Radiology
assistant (6)
Admin staff (7)
Porter
(2)
Student (5)
0
1
2 2 1
3 1 1
4 2
5 3 1 2
6 1 1
7 1 1 3 2 3
8 1 4 1 1
9 1 1 1
10 1
11
12
13 1 1
Don’t know
0 0
1st round 2nd round
Distribution of number of correct answers
20
Results Results Target - > 50% awareness
1st audit 2nd audit
Consultant Radiologist 3/3 (100%) 3/3 (100%)
SpR radiology 0 2/2 (100%)
Radiographer 15/18 (83%) 7/13 (53%)
Radiology Assistant 2/9 (17%) 4/6 (67%)
Administrative Staff 3/17 (17%) 3/7 (42%)
Portering Staff 0/3 (0%) 0/2 (0%)
Radiography Student 4/4 (100%) 4/5 (80%)
21
Observations – first audit
• Admin staff and porters are of the opinion that Ultrasound and MRI examination involve radiation exposure
• 70% (12/17) of administrative staff respond ‘Don’t know’.
• Radiography Students (4) have performed well – max being 11/13
• Highest mark (knowledge) by a radiographer (12/13)• 7/13 is average score amongst radiographers - 53%
22
Observations and Actions taken
• Awareness of radiation exposure in common radiological examinations amongst staff working in radiology department is poor
• 77% return of forms• Radiology nurses have not submitted form
• Lunch time lectures ( x 4) on procedures undertaken in the department and on IR(ME)R
23
Observations – second round audit
• Maximum score obtained by 1 consultant radiologist and radiographer
• Radiology assistants – massive improvement in knowledge
– 100% in the IR(ME)R questions and
– 67% responders ( cf 17%) achieving > 50% score.
– 1 Rad assistant scored 9/13
• Admin staff demonstrate some improved knowledge in radiation awareness:
– No staff response of ‘Don’t know’.
24
Observations – second round
• Radiographers
– improve on the IR(ME)R question
• (89% –> 92% correct)
– decreased awareness of radiation equivalents
• (83% -> 53% > 50% marks )
• Porters – very low awareness – no improvement.
• Radiology nurses have not submitted forms
25
Further observations
• Admin staff indicated that
– MRI involved radiation (3)
– CT head, CT abdomen involved radiation dose equivalent > 800 CXR (5)
• Porters continue to believe that
– MRI and US involved radiation
– Barium swallow study involved no radiation.
26
Further observations
• Students
– indicate CT head and CT chest dose equivalents > 800 CXR
– are aware that US & MRI involve NO radiation
– are aware that PET-CT involves very large dose > 800 CXR (100%)
• Overall knowledge of dose equivalent of CT head is poor (30% radiographers, 50% SpR)
27
Limitation
• Reference - iRefer (2012) for validation of radiation doses and chest x-ray equivalents.
• However, these doses are relatively higher than STFT radiology in view of iDose in CT and Digital radiography.
28
Staff Responses
• ‘Thank you for taking the time to inform us’– Admin staff
• ‘I now feel better equipped to answer patient questions’– Radiology Assistant
• ‘I am able to understand my job better’– Radiology Assistant
29
Summary
• Overall there is good interval improvement in awareness of radiation dose equivalents amongst radiology assistants and admin staff.
• Staff feel valued
30
Recommendations and Action plan
• Essential attendance at department lecture on procedures undertaken in the department and on radiation protection and Ionising (ME) regulations 2000 and 2006 to all staff
• Although some staff are not directly involved in radiation exposure, it is essential they are aware of these procedures as they work in a radiation designated area
31
32
• My thanks to radiography student Sophie for distribution and collection of data sheets in radiology department in second audit cycle.
• Any questions or suggestions
33
References
1. Soye & Paterson. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. BJR 2008; 81: 725-729. http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/81/969/725
2. The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000. HMSO. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2000/1059/pdfs/uksi_20001059_en.pdf
3. iRefer. Making the best use of clinical radiology 7th Edition RCR 2012 www.rcr.ac.uk/content.aspx?pageid=995