Newsletter on Indonesian competition law and policy

www.kppu.go.id

kompetisiavol. 08/2010

Law EnforcementThe Publication of Decision on AllegedViolation of Article 22 of Law No.5 Year1999 in relation to the Tender forRoads and Bridges Handling in BimaDistrict

Competition AdvocacyThe Importance of the Parameters andPrinciples of Regulatory ImpactAnalysis

vol 08/20102

Table ofContents

Law EnforcementDecision on Alleged Violation ofArticle 22 of Law No.5 Year 1999 inrelation to the Tender forProcurement of LanguageLaboratory Equipment and Tools inKudus District Regional Office forEducation, Youth and Sports

The Publication of Decision onAlleged Violation of Article 22 ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 in relation withthe Tender for Roads and BridgesDevelopment/Improvement Projectin Lebong District, BengkuluProvince

The Publication of Decision onAlleged Violation of Article 22 ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 in relation to theTender for Roads and BridgesHandling in Bima District

3

4

5

Competition AdvocacyThe KPPU’s Early Efforts forAdvocacy

Seminar on Business CompetitionLaw and Goods/ServicesProcurement Issues held inSamarinda, East Kalimantan

The Importance of the Parametersand Principles of Regulatory ImpactAnalysis

Discussion on Fair BusinessCompetition in Bau-BauDistrict,Southeast SulawesiProvince

KPPU Structural Job Handover

6

7

8

9

10

Decision regarding AllegedViolation of Article 22 of Law No.5Year 1999 in relation to the Tenderfor Advanced Works of TakalarSeaport Facilities

6

vol 08/2010 3

LawEnforcement

Decision on Alleged Violation of Article 22 of LawNo.5 Year 1999 in relation to the Tender forProcurement of Language Laboratory Equipmentand Tools in Kudus District Regional Office forEducation, Youth and Sports

The Commission for the Supervision ofBusiness Competition (the KPPU) has finishedundertaking investigation and confirmed thedecision on Case Number: 07/KPPU-L/2010,namely Alleged Violation against Article 22 ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition related to Tender for Procurementof Language Laboratory Tools in Kudus DistrictRegional Office for Education, Youth and SportsDistrict Budget (APBD) Year 2009.

In compliance with the investigation results, thebusiness actors alleged to have committedviolations and made to be the Reported Partieswere CV Global Inc. (Reported Party I), CVInternational (Reported Party II), TenderCommittee for the Procurement of LanguageLaboratory Equipment and Tools within the

Kudus District Regional Office for Education,Youth and Sports for Fiscal Year 2009(Reported Party III).

Based on the evidence and considerations, theCommission Assembly then decided to statethat the Reported Party I and the Reported PartyII were proven legally and convincingly to haveviolated against Article 22 of Law No.5 Year1999 regarding Prohibition of MonopolisticPractices and Unfair Business Competition; theReported Party II was not proven legally andconvincingly to have violated against Article 22of Law No.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition; and Penalize the Reported Party Ito pay a fine amounting to Rp.147,000,000 andthe Reported Party II to pay a fine amounting toRp.54,000,000.

ww

w.u

cc.ie

vol 08/20104

LawEnforcement

The Publication of Decision on Alleged Violationof Article 22 of Law No.5 Year 1999 in relation

with the Tender for Roads and BridgesDevelopment/Improvement Project in Lebong

District, Bengkulu Province

The Commission for the Supervision ofBusiness Competition (the KPPU) has finishedundertaking investigation and confirmed thedecision on Case Number: 35/KPPU-L/2009,namely Alleged Violation against Article 22 ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition in relation with the Tender for Roadsand Bridges Development/Improvement Projectin Lebong District, Bengkulu Province - FiscalYear 2008 to 2009.

In compliance with the investigation results, thebusiness actors alleged to have committedviolations and made to be the Reported Parties

were PT Ratu Biru Sejati in Joint Operation (JO)with PT Buana Karya Tirta (the Reported PartyI), PT Daya Mulia Turangga (the Reported PartyII), PT Daya Mulia Turangga in Joint Operation(JO) with PT Jati Luhur (the Reported Party III),PT Bara Resi Sakti (the Reported Party IV),PTJedds Constructs (the Reported Party V), theCommittee for Work Unit Procurement of PublicWorks Regional Office (Panitia PengadaanPekerjaan Unit/P3U Dinas PU) in LebongDistrict - Year 2008 (the Reported Party VI), andZulkarnain Syidik (the Reported Party VIII).

Based on the evidence, facts and conclusionsand considering Article 43 paragraph (3) andArticle 47 of Law No.5 of 1999, the CommissionAssembly decided to state that the the ReportedParty I, the Reported Party II, the ReportedParty IV, and the Reported Party V were provenlegally and convincingly to have violated Article22 of Law No.5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition, while the Reported Party III, theReported Party VI, and the Reported Party VIIwere not proven to have violated Article 22 ofLaw No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition; Penalizing the Reported I pay afine amounting to Rp.525,000,000 (FiveHundred and Twenty-Five Million Rupiah),Punishing the Reported Party II, the ReportedParty IV, and the Reported Party V so that theyshall not be allowed to participate in any tenderarranged by the Government of Lebong Districtfor 1 (one) year.

http://1

.bp.b

logspot.com

vol 08/2010 5

The Publication of Decision on AllegedViolation of Article 22 of Law No.5 Year 1999 in

relation to the Tender for Roads and BridgesHandling in Bima District

The Commission for the Supervision ofBusiness Competition (the KPPU) has finishedundertaking investigation and confirmed thedecision on Case Number: 35/KPPU-L/2009,namely Alleged Violation against Article 22 ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition in relation with Tender for Roadsand Bridges Handling in Bima District by thePubl ic Works Regional Off ice, RoadDevelopment Division, Bima District, West NusaTenggara Province - Fiscal Year 2009, with thescopes of activities as follows:1. Package I: Rehabilitation of Sigi Rato

Bridge, W = 40 M' in Bolo Subdistrict(hereinafter referred to as Package I);

2. Package IV: Improvement of Roads Sarita –Wadukopa – Kala, Rato – Mangge, O'o –Mangge, Sangari – Mbawa, Bajo –Sampungu, Karaku – Roa Kecil and Bolotown area (hereinafter referred to asPackage IV);

3. Package V: Improvement of Roads Daru –Jala – Nggembe, Donggobolo – Kalampa,

Tente – Ncera, Pucuke– Keli dan Pandai Risa(hereinafter referred toas Package V).

I n l i n e w i t h t h einvestigation results,the business actorsthat were alleged toh a v e c o m m i t t e dviolations and made tobe the Repo r tedP a r t i e s w e r e P TBunga Raya Lestarivia PT. Citra NusraPersada (the ReportedParty I), PT. ModernaTeknik Perkasa (theReported Party II), PTSarana Multi Usaha(the Reported PartyI I I ) , P T N a s r iN i a g a t a m a ( t h eReported Party IV), PTBima Putera Mandiri

(the Reported Party V), CV Silver (the ReportedParty VI).

Considering that, based on the aforementionedfacts and conclusions and in view of Article 43paragraph (3) and Article 47 of Law No. 5 Year1999, on 16th July 2010 the CommissionAssembly decided to declare that all ReportedParties were proven legally and convincingly tohave violated Article 22 of Law No. 5 Year 1999regarding Prohibition of Monopolistic Practicesand Unfair Business Competition, and to punishall the Reported Parties not to be allowed toparticipate in any tender process acrossIndonesia for 1 (one) year since the time thisDecision has a permanent legal force, and topenalize all Reported Parties to pay a fineamounting to Rp.1,950,000,000 (the ReportedParty I), Rp.975,000,000 (the Reported Party IIand the Reported Party III), Rp.150,000,000 (theReported Party IV), Rp.75,000,000 (theReported Party V and the Reported Party VI), incase they are against the paragraph 2 (two) ofthis Decision.

LawEnforcement

ww

w.a

nta

ra-s

um

bar.

com

vol 08/20106

Decision regarding Alleged Violationof Article 22 of Law No.5 Year 1999 inrelation to the Tender for AdvancedWorks of Takalar Seaport Facilities

The Commission for the Supervision of BusinessCompetition (the KPPU) has finished undertakinginvestigation and confirmed the decision on CaseNumber: 04/KPPU-L/2010, namely Alleged Violationagainst Article 22 of Law No.5 Year 1999 regardingProhibition of Monopolistic Practices and UnfairBusiness Competition related to the Tender forAdvanced Works of Takalar Seaport Facilities - DIPAStimulus Fiskal for Fiscal Year 2009.

In compliance with the investigation results, thebusiness actors alleged to have committed violationsand made to be the Reported Parties were PT ArthaGuna (the Reported Party I); Republika NusantaraPermai (the Reported Party II); Alfindo Perkasa (theReported Party III); Goods and Services ProcurementCommittee for Advanced Works of Takalar SeaportFacilities - DIPA Stimulus Fiskal for Fiscal Year 2009(hereinafter referred to as Tender Committee orCommittee) (the Reported Party IV).

Based on the evidence, facts, and conclusions, and inview of Article 43 paragraph (3) of Law No.5 Year1999, the Commission Assembly decided to declarethe Reported Party I, the Reported Party II, theReported Party III, and Reported Party IV wereproven legally and convincingly to have violatedArticle 22 of Law No.5 Year 1999 concerningProhibition of Monopolistic Practices and UnfairBusiness Competition, and to Penalize the ReportedParty I, the Reported Party II, and the Reported PartyIII to jointly pay a fine amounting to Rp.400,000,000(four hundred million rupiah).

The KPPU’s Early Effortsfor Advocacy

On Monday, 26 July 2010 at 14:00 pm (WesternIndonesian Time), the KPPU received a visit fromstudents of the School of Economics, ParamadinaUniversity. A total of approximately 34 students and 2lecturers visited the KPPU in order to conduct ahearing.

During the hearing, the things exposed were LawNo.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition of MonopolisticPractices and Unfair Business Competition, theKPPU’s duties and functions, several KPPU’sachievements in performing its duties as the businesscompetition supervising agent (watchdog), theKPPU’s important roles in the Indonesian economy asevidenced by several real achievements. Thedecreased airfare and low-cost SMS were theconcrete examples achieved by the KPPU in order toprotect consumers’ interests. In addition, themechanisms and stages in case handling werediscussed.

The exposition delivered by the KPPU was respondedwith enthusiasm by the students. The discussionbegan with the students asking questions regardingseveral things which were, among other things, theKPPU’s supervising function, preventive programsconducted by the KPPU in preventing unfair businesscompetition, some cartel cases, and compensationfine imposed by the KPPU on business actors.

In the discussion, the problems of cartels that hadbeen successfully revealed by the KPPU were alsorevealed. Some of these cases included SMS cartel,fuel surcharge cartel, cooking oil cartel, and allegedcement cartel currently handled by the KPPU. A cartelis an action completely detrimental to communitysince the price offered from the presence of such acartel is unreasonable. Therefore, in advancedcountries, the cartel is classified into a criminal case.

CompetitionAdvocacy

LawEnforcement

http://e

ng.k

ppu.g

o.id

vol 08/2010 7

Seminar on BusinessCompetition Law andGoods/ServicesProcurement Issues heldin Samarinda, EastKalimantan

The seminar with a theme "Competition Law andGoods and Services Procurement Issues" washeld on 22 July 2010 in Swiss-bel Hotel,Samarinda, East Kalimantan.

This activity aims at providing the KPPU’sstakeholders with insights regarding faircompetition in the procurement of goods andservices in accordance with the provisions ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition. During the seminar, the mainpoints delivered were business competition andthe aspects in the business competition for thereal existence of healthy competition in theprocurement of government goods andservices. The fair business competition shall begoverned by the provisions of Law No. 5/1999

and has an intention that the market will remaincompetitive and is prevented from the influenceof the conspiracy that tend to reduce or eliminatecompetition itself.

The Secretary of the Government of SamarindaMunicipality uncovered the problems arisingwithin the Government of SamarindaMunicipality, East Kalimantan consisting of 3(three) municipalities and 6 (six) districts. Theproblem that frequently arises in a tender is BidSuspension, a suspension against a bid thatemploys any person exerting forceful practices(tenaga premanisme) in making an offer/bid tobring down a competitor’s price or prices.Complementary biding is a conspiracy thatseeks to perform complementary actionsassociated with a tender bid. For example,Company A provides a CPU, Company Bprovides a monitor, and Company C provides akeyboard. Bid predecessor, just as a tendersocial gathering is a tender bid/offer in which thetender winner had been predetermined insuccession. Market division is the division ofterritory for the tender winners; for example,Company A as the tender winner in Sumatraregion and Company B as the tender winner inKalimantan region.

The audience said that the socialization is doneCommission in this city is very helpful inproviding knowledge to the community,particularly in the areas of procurement of goodsand services.

CompetitionAdvocacy

kompetisia vol 08/20108

The Importance of the Parameters andPrinciples of Regulatory Impact Analysis

Currently, the KPPU has 6 (six) RegionalRepresentative Offices (KPD), with a newadditional Regional Representative Office(KPD) in Manado that was inaugurated on 15July 2010. The ceremony of the new KPDinauguration was opened by the ManadoMun i c i pa l i t y Sec re ta r y, Mr Rahma tMokodongan. The Regional RepresentativeOffice in Manado is led by Setya Budi Yuliantowith a working area covering a number ofProvinces, namely North Sulawesi, Gorontalo,North Maluku, West Papua and Papua.

Upon the inauguration of the KPPU’s RegionalRepresentative Office in Manado, the KPPUalso held a Seminar on Business CompetitionPolicy with a theme "Creating air BusinessCompetition in the Framework of RegionalGovernment Policy."

The important points delivered by speakers inthe Seminar were, among others, "Principles ofRegulatory ImpactAnalysis" which includes:• That every regulation/policy shall guaranteethe welfare for the people through the availabilityof products in the market, and its innovation andvariations;•. That every regulation/policy shall promotenational economic efficiency through theavailability of products in the market witheconomical prices;• That every regulation/policy shall guaranteethe business and opportunities for eachbusiness actor through the reduction of entrybarriers and exit barriers out of the market;• That every regulation/policy shall prevent the

emergence of any anti-competitive behaviors;In addition, to analyze the regulatory impacts, itis necessary to know “the Parameters ofRegulatory Impact Analysis " which includes thefollowing:• A regulation/policy will give a negative impacton the business competition climate if thisregulation/policy results in price increase and orproduction level (volume) decrease in themarket;• A regulation/policy will give a negative impacton the business competition climate if thisregulation/policy results in a reduction orlimitation on the variety and quality of productson the market;• A regulation/policy will give a negative impacton the business competition climate if thisregulation/policy decreases the level or ability ofbusiness actors in increasing efficiency;• A regulation/policy will give a negative impacton the business competition if this regulation/policy results in space reduction or limitation forbusiness actors in carrying out productinnovations;

The principles and parameters in analyzing thepolicy impact are expected to become a guidefor regulators in making a policy so as not toconflict with fair business competition principles.Under a fair business climate, the economy willincrease and thus the people will be prosperous.The KPPU expects that the establishment of theKPPU’s Regional Representative Office inManado will contribute to the economicimprovement in North Sulawesi.

CompetitionAdvocacy

vol 08/2010 9

Discussion on Fair Business Competitionin Bau-Bau District,

Southeast Sulawesi Province

The discussion with a theme "Perspectives ofFair Business Competition in the Procurementof Goods and Services" was held on 1 July 2010at Rajawali Hotel, Bau Bau, Sulawesi Tenggara.This activity aims at providing the KPPU’sstakeholders with understanding on faircompetition in the procurement of goods andservices in accordance with the provisions ofLaw No.5 Year 1999 regarding Prohibition ofMonopolistic Practices and Unfair BusinessCompetition. Business competition shall begoverned by the provisions of Law No. 5/1999and has an intention that the market shall remaincompetitive and avoid the influences ofagreements and conspiracies which tend toreduce or eliminate competition.

The benefits from the presence of Law No.5 /1999 for the Indonesian people as consumers ofvarious products offered by producers in themarket are that the consumer is no longer a

victim of the producer’s position as a 'pricetaker', diversity of products and prices mayfacilitate the consumer’s choice, a consumer isno longer fooled by high prices but the productquality is under the standard (commonly found inthe monopoly market), the market opencondition so the business actors’ chances aregreater, and so forth.

In Law No.5/1999 there are a number ofsubstances, including prohibited agreementsand prohibited activities. The example of aprohibited agreement is price fixing, while theexample of a prohibited activity is conspiracy.The conspiracies meant to be prohibitedactivities are selecting/determining a bid/tenderwinner, conspiring to obtain any information onany competitor’s business activity that isclassified as a corporate secret, and inhibitingthe production and/or marketing of competingbusiness actor ’s goods/services with anintention that the goods/services offered orsupplied in the relevant market become reducedin terms of quantity, quality, and requiredtimeliness.

Bau-Bau Municipality itself has some problemsin the procurement of goods and services, one ofwhich is the case of goods supplied by thetender winner that did not match the goodsordered. Therefore, the audience said that theKPPU’s socialization held in the municipality hadbeen very helpful in providing the communitywith knowledge, particularly in goods andservices procurement.

CompetitionAdvocacy

vol 08/201010

Handover ceremony held KPPU Position (Sertijab)after going through the process of appointment andPlacement of Structural. Elected officials is the resultof a series of promotional activities and movementswhich have been implemented by KPPU accordancewith the procedures so as to produce competentofficials and Structural integrity. The following names,titles old and new positions of structural KPPU:

Drs. Mokhamad Syuhadhak, M.P.A. (Head ofPublic Relations and Legal Bureau, Public Relationsand Legal Bureau assigned as Task ImplementingPerson (PlT) for Secretary-General.)

Drs. Nur Muhammad SP, M.M. (Main Investigatorassigned as Chief of Administration Bureau,Administration Bureau)

Tubagus Hikmatullah, S.E. Ak., M.Com (Head ofPlanning and Finance Bureau, Planning and FinanceBureau)

Mohammad Reza, S.H. (Main Investigatorassigned as Chief of Investigation Bureau,Investigation Bureau)

Helli Nurcahyo, SH, L.L.M. (Main Investigatorassigned as Chief of Enforcement Bureau, LawEnforcement Bureau)

Ir. Taufik Ahmad, S.T., M.M. (Main Investigatorassigned as Head of Mergers Bureau, MergerBureau)

Ahamad Junaidi, S.H., M.H., LL.M., M.Kn. (MainInvestigator assigned as Chief of Policy Bureau,Policy Bureau)

Taufik Ariyanto Arsad, S.E., M.E. (MainInvestigator assigned as Chief of AssessmentBureau,Assessment Bureau)

Drs. Martoyo Miran Soemarto (Head of InternalSupervision Bureau, Internal Supervision Bureau)

Andi Zubaida Assaf, S.T.P., M. Si. (Head of

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

Planning and Programs Section, Planning andFinance Bureau

Ir. Budhi Praharto Junior (Main Investigatorassigned as Chief of Evaluation and ProgramReporting Section, Planning and Financial Bureau)

Drs. Yogi S. Wibowo, M.M. (Head of BudgetVerification and Implementation Section, Planningand Financial Bureau)

Lelyana Mayasari, S.E.,Ak. (Junior Maininvestigator assigned as Head of Accounting andFinancial Reporting Section, Planning and FinancialBureau)

Lukman Sungkar, S.E., M.M. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of General AffairsSection,Administration Bureau)

Utami Pudjiastuti, S. Psi. (Head of Organizationand Management Section,Administration Bureau)

Dedy Sani Ardi, S.E., M.E. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Human ResourcesDevelopment Section,Administration Bureau)

Zaki Zein Badroen, S.E. (Main Madya Investigatorassigned as Head of Advocacy Section, PublicRelations and Legal Bureau)

A. Kaylani, S.Ag, M.Si (Junior Main investigatorassigned as Head of Institutional Cooperation andPublications Section, Public Relations and LegalBureau)

Deswin Nur, S.E., M.E. (Main Madya Investigatorassigned as Head of Foreign Cooperation Section,Public Relations and Legal Bureau)

Fisika Yuniawan A., S.E., M.Si. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of InformationTechnology Section, Public Relations and LegalBureau)

Arnold Sihombing, S.H., M.H. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of Legal Section,Public Relations and Legal Bureau)

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

KPPU Structural Job Handover

CompetitionAdvocacy

vol 08/2010 11

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

Jimat J. Suhara, S.H. (Junior Main Investigatorassigned as Head of Initiative Case Section,Investigation Bureau)

Akhmad Muhari, S.H. (Junior Main Investigatorassigned as Head of Report Clarification Section,Investigation Bureau)

Verry Iskandar, S.H., M.Hum. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as the Associate Head ofInvestigation Section, Investigation Bureau)

Muh. Hadi Susanto, S.H., M.H. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Filing Section, LawEnforcement Bureau)

Maduseno Dewobroto, S.H., M.H. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of the AssemblySession Section, Law Enforcement Bureau)

Dinni Melanie, S.H., M.E. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Registry Section,Law Enforcement Bureau)

Endah Widwianingsih, S.H., M.H. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Litigation Section,Law Enforcement Bureau)

Siswanto, S.P., M.H. (Junior Main Investigatorassigned as Head of Execution Section, LawEnforcement Bureau)

Elpi Nazmuzzaman, S.E. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of Policy andRegulation Harmonization Section, Policy Bureau)

Marcellina Nuring A., S.I.P., M.E. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Chief of Policy andRegulationAnaysis Section, Policy Bureau)

Indar Sri Bulan, S.H. (Junior Main Investigatorassigned as Head of Policy and Regulation Advice,Policy Bureau)

Riris Munadiya, S.T., M.E (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Economics Section,Bureau ofAssessment)

Noor Aisyah Amini, S.P.,M.E. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Industrial Section,Assessment Bureau)

Mohammad Noor Rofieq, S.T. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of Data andInformation Section,Assessment Bureau)

Sholihatun Kiptiyah, S.I.P., M.A. (Head of DecisionDocumentation and Evaluation Section, AssessmentBureau)

Goppera Panggabean, S.E., Ak. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Internal SupervisionPlanning Section, Internal Supervision Bureau)

Sri Isnani Husnayati, S.E. (Head of InvestigationSection, Internal Supervisory Bureau)

Etty Nurhayati, S.H. (Junior Main Investigatorassigned as Head of Monitoring Section, InternalSupervisory Bureau)

Mulyawan R., S.E. (Junior Main Investigator

assigned as Head of Medan Representative Office)Dendy Rakhmad Sutrisno, S.H. (Main Madya

Investigator assigned as Head of SurabayaRepresentative Office)

Abdul Hakim Pasaribu, S.E., M.E. (Junior Maininvestigator assigned as Head of MakassarRepresentative Office)

Anang Triyono, S.E., M.E. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of BalikpapanRepresentative Office)

Ramli ST Simanjuntak, S.H. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of BatamRepresentative Office)

Setya Budi Yulianto, S.H. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of ManadoRepresentative Office)

Retno Suprihandayani, S.H. (Acting Head ofHuman Resources Development and Training,Administration Bureau)

Tutik Yuniar, S.E. ( A c t i n g H e a d o fAdministration Section,Administration Bureau)

Dewi Sita Yuliani, S.T., M.H. (Junior MainInvestigator assigned as Head of Notification Section,Merger Bureau and also serves as Task ImplementingPerson (PlT) for Initial Research Section Head,Merger Bureau.)

Farid Fauzi Nasution, S.I.P., L.L.M. (Main MadyaInvestigator assigned as Head of Substance TestingSection, Merger Bureau and also serves as TaskImplementing Person (PlT) for Head of Monitoringand Evaluation Secton, Merger Bureau)

In addition, based on the Business CompetitionSupervisory Commission Regulation Number 09 Year2010 regarding Staff Expert Business CompetitionSupervisory Commission, and based on the BusinessCompetition Supervisory Commission Decree of theRepublic of Indonesia Number 04/KPPU/KEP/I/2010on Organization and Administration of the BusinessCompetition Supervisory Commission SecretariatRepublic of Indonesia, so it needed the Expert StaffAppointment and Placement Committee Member ofthe Commission Maid Elements. After going throughthe circuit selection process, KPPU has set thefollowing names as SeniorAdvisor to the CommissionCommission Members Maid Elements:• Ismed Fadillah, SH, M. Si• R. Kurnia Sya’ranie, SH, MH• Ir. Ir. Ruly Tisna Yuliansa• DR. Ridwan Zachrie• Mohammad Zein, SE.MM• Rahmadi Budi Sulistyo, SH•Ardhian Dwiyoenanto, SH, MH

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

CompetitionAdvocacy

Competition is about price, supply, selection and service. It benefits consumers bykeeping prices low, avaibility, quality and choice of goods and services high.

KPPU-RICommission for the Supervision of Business CompetitionRepublic of IndonesiaKPPU Building, Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 36, Central Jakarta 10120

Phone. 021-350 7015, 350 7016, 350 7043 Fax. 021-350 7008

email: infokom@kppu.go.id

Surabaya

Medan

Balikpapan

Bumi Mandiri Building, Jl. Basuki Rahmat No. 129-137Surabaya 60271 - East JavaPhone. 031-545 4146, Fax. 031-545 4146email: kpd_surabaya@kppu.go.id

Ir. H. Juanda No. 9AMedan - North SumateraPhone. 061-455 8133, Fax. 061-414 803email: kpd_medan@kppu.go.id

BRI Building 8th Floor, Jl. Sudirman No. 37Balikpapan 76112 - East KalimantanPhone. 0542-730 373, Fax. 0542-415 939email: kpd_balikpapan@kppu.go.id

Jl.

Makassar

Batam

Menara Makassar 1st Floor, Jl. Nusantara No. 1Makassar - South SulawesiPhone. 0411-310 733, Fax. 0411-310 733email: kpd_makassar@kppu.go.id

Graha Pena Building 3rd A FloorJl. Raya Batam Center, Teluk Tering, NongsaBatam 29461 - Kepulauan RiauPhone. 0778-469 337, Fax. 0778-469 433email: kpd_batam@kppu.go.id

www.kppu.go.id

Regional Representative Offices