krakow2010

12
Co-funded by the Community programme eContentplus European Network of Best Practices for Interoperability of Spatial Planning Information

Upload: karel-charvat

Post on 16-Jan-2015

467 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The ideas about spatial planning metadata profile of Plan4all project

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Krakow2010

Co-funded by the Community programmeeContentplus

European Network of BestPractices for Interoperabilityof Spatial Planning Information

Page 2: Krakow2010

WP 3

1. Analysis of requirements given by national legislation

2. Plan4all metadata profile design

Page 3: Krakow2010

WP 3 Metadata profile

Profiles1. Spatial plan metadata

2. Web services metadata

3. Spatial Data Theme metadata (dataset level) - WP4

4. Spatial Data Theme metadata (feature level) - WP4

Use of metadata Discovery (CSW) Documentation (dataset)

Discovery

Evaluation

Use

Page 4: Krakow2010

Spatial plan structure

Map 1Map 1

Textdocument

Textdocument

Map 2Map 2 Map 3Map 3

Textdocument

Textdocument

Textdocument

Textdocument

Spatial Plan Structure

Layer Layer Layer Layer

Page 5: Krakow2010

Profile: ISO 19115 / 19119 subset INSPIRE compliant Some extra queryables

SP metadata available during SP design process Documentation of SP adoption legislative steps

Requirements

Page 6: Krakow2010

SP Metadata componets

Spatial plan metadata (M)Spatial plan metadata (M)

Dataset MetadataDataset

Metadata

Application schema

Application schemaDataset

MetadataDataset

MetadataDataset

MetadataDataset

Metadata

parentIdentifier

softwareDevelopmentFile uri

Page 7: Krakow2010

Plan4all specific

1. SP Level (national / regional / local / sublocal): hierarchyLevelName

2. Organization roles (mapped to ISO codes)

3. Keywords – from Plan4all glossary

4. Application schema – link to external file

5. Text documents – distributionInfo//linkage

6. Multilingual metadata

Page 8: Krakow2010

Steps

Preparation phasePreparation phase In forceIn force

9.

Co

min

g i

nto

fo

rce

11

. E

xp

ira

tio

n

1. W

ork

star

t –

proc

ure

men

t ap

pro

val

10. R

epor

t on

pla

n's

appl

icat

ion

app

rova

l

4. C

once

pt

draf

t –

star

tin

g th

e di

scus

sion

3. S

pec

ifica

tion

- a

ppr

oval

2. S

pec

ifica

tion

– s

tart

ing

the

dis

cuss

ion

6. B

efor

e ap

pro

val -

sta

rtin

g th

e d

iscu

ssio

n

5. I

nst

ruct

ions

for

pre

par

atio

ns -

app

rova

l

7. B

efor

e ap

pro

val-

op

inio

n o

f a

reg

i. off

ice

8.

Be

fore

ap

pro

va

l -

iss

ue

10. R

epor

t on

pla

n's

appl

icat

ion

app

rova

l

Mapping: •lineage/*/processStep (preparation phase, revisions, …)•extent/*/temporalElement (in force) 9 - 11•citation/*/date (publication) - 8

Page 9: Krakow2010

Steps

MS specific

Page 10: Krakow2010

Source

Page 11: Krakow2010

Lineage

Plan 3

Plan 1Plan 2

Feature N

Generalized INSPIRE Theme

Feature level metadataInherited ?Links ?

metadata metadata

metadata

Page 12: Krakow2010

Recommendations for INSPIRE

1. Add status property to each INSPIRE theme ! gmd:MD_ProgressCode ? (planned,completed,obsolete,…) Own mapping? exiting / planned , true / false …

2. Add lineage metadata to each INSPIRE theme !