VEDAS VS KRISHNA:-Missionaries Often argue to prove Jesus is God as follow:-1] Either Jesus is God or a liar.2] Either Jesus is what He claimed to be or a liar.If you donot have the courage to say Jesus is a liar then you have to accept Jesus is God.How ever thses are crude in form. A similar form of argument can be asked for Krishna but in refined form.EITHER KRISHNA IS WHAT HE CLAIMED TO BE OR KRISHNA IS NOT WHAT HE CLAIMED TO BE.IF KRISHNA IS NOT WHAT HE CLAIMED TO BE THEN THE CRADIBILITY OF GITA IN PARTICULAR AND MAHA BHARTA IN GENERAL IS LOST AND THEY BECOME FABRICATIONS.IF KRISHNA IS WHAT HE SAID TO BE THEN A PROOF IS REQUIRED FOR THE TRUTH OF THE CLAIM KRISHNA IS WHAT HE CLAIMED TO BE. BUT THIS CLAIM CANNOT BE PROVED FROM GITA BUT PROOF TEXS MUST BE CITED FROM 4 VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS. IF THIS CLAIM IS UNPROVABLE THEN KRISHNA CANNOT BE GOD JUST BECAUSE HE CLAIMED TO BE GOD. IF IT IS ARGUED THAT VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS PREDATRES KRISHNA AND GITA ETC. AND THEY CANNOT BE PROVED FROM VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS . THEN IT IS JUST A CONFESSION THAT KRISHNA AND GITA ARE UNPROVABLE. IF UN PROVABLE THEN THEY CANNOT BE BELIEVED IN. BUT THE REQUIREMENT IS OF PROPHECIES. THERE MUST BE SOME PROPHECIES LIKE THERE WOULD BE A PERSON BORN , NAMED KRISHNA SON OF SO AND SO ETC. FROM VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS. IF THERE ARE NO SUCH PROPHECIES IN VEDAS AND IN 10 UPNISHUDS, THEN THE CLAIM KRISHNA IS WHAT SO EVER HE CLAIMED TO BE CANNOT BE TRUE. SIMILARLY TRUTH OF GITA AND MAHA BHARTA REQUIRS FROOFS FROM VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHAUDS OTHER WISE THEY ARE NOT RELIABLE AND IF NOT RELIABLE THEN HERETICAL FABRICATIONS.