kristi shute indiana office of inspector general

28
Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Upload: piers-stevenson

Post on 25-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Kristi ShuteIndiana Office of Inspector General

Page 2: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Kristi [email protected](317) 234-3993

Office of Inspector General315 West Ohio Street

Room 104Indianapolis, IN 46202

www.in.gov/ig

Page 3: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

The Bottom Line:

A public employee’s statement, given during an internal

investigation, cannot be used against him in a later criminal

proceeding.

Page 4: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

The Run-down:

• Police Officers questioned re: fixing traffic tickets

• Told if they refused to answer, faced termination

• When they answered questions, answers were used

against them in criminal proceedings

Page 5: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

No!• The choice between:

– Losing your job OR– Self-incrimination

Constitutes coercion!

Therefore, the answers were not voluntary!

Page 6: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Protection of the Individual under the 14th amendment against coerced statements

prohibits use in subsequent criminal proceedings of statements obtained under threat of removal from office.

Applies to all members of the body politic! i.e. public employees

Page 7: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Public employee

Explicit threat of loss of job

Criminal proceeding

Page 8: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Police Officer appeared under Grand Jury subpoena

Refused “waiver of immunities”

Fired for refusal to waive immunity

Page 9: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Unless given use immunity, cannot be fired for refusal

If use immunity given, may be fired if continued refusal

to answerSpecific, directed questions

Page 10: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Sanitation employees summoned to testify re:

corruption

Fired when refused to relinquish 5th amendment rights

Page 11: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Public employees subject to dismissal if refuse to account for performance of their

public trust, after proper proceedings, which do not involve attempt to coerce relinquishment of constitutional rights.

Because state wished to use answers for criminal proceeding, and not merely

account of public trust, employees could not be dismissed

Page 12: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

NY statutes required public contracts to provide that if contractor refuses to waive immunity or testify concerning his state contracts, existing contracts

may be cancelled & could be disqualified for 5 years

Page 13: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

NY licensed architects refused to sign immunity waivers for grand jury

subpoena

Contracting authorities notified of the conduct

Architects challenged statutes as violating privilege against compelled

self-incrimination

Page 14: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Extends Garrity to contractors

Page 15: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Physician charged with distribution of a controlled substance

Appeared before ALJ to address the suspension of his DEA registration,

testified as an adverse witness.

Registration formally revoked.

Page 16: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Choice: Assert 5th amendment and ALJ could draw negative inference, or testify

and risk incriminating statements

Distinguishable: in Garrity refusal to waive alone resulted in loss of employment

Potential silence only one factor to be considered by ALJ when making

determination

Page 17: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Notice: Not a public employee involved

Page 18: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Fire Dept Employee questioned by federal agency after supervisor told

him they were downstairs

Employee answered questions

Then argued for suppression of answers based on Garrity

Page 19: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Interrogation did not violate Garrity:

Statements not obtained under threat of removal from fire department

position

Neither agents nor Supervisor mentioned to defendant that refusal to answer would result in removal

from employment

Page 20: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Police Officer charged with DUI

Argued to bar admission of breath test results arguing that he provided

sample only under threat of termination

Page 21: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Fifth Amendment applies only to testimonial or communicative

evidence, not physical evidence

Bisard

Page 22: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Fire Dept Capt accused of sexual harassment

2 hearings held resulting in termination

Page 23: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Garrity does not protect public employees from having to

answer questions concerning their conduct at their own

termination hearings in non-criminal investigation

Page 24: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

FSSA Caseworker

D interviewed separately: OIG special agents then agency personnel

Page 25: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Motion to Suppress

“Fruits” inadmissible also

Page 26: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Internal investigation?

Criminal investigation?

Training key

Page 27: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

A public employee’s statement, given during an internal

investigation, cannot be used against him in a later criminal

proceeding.

Keep internal and criminal investigations separate

Page 28: Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Thank you!Office of Inspector General

315 West Ohio StreetRoom 104

Indianapolis, IN 46202(317) 232-3850www.in.gov/ig