kudo simulation
DESCRIPTION
heyTRANSCRIPT
Network latency
ETX performs better than OF0 because it considers link level detail
Energy Consumption
Every Consumption of network is more at the start with more lossy network., decrease the lossyness in network the energy consumption. Because the lossy environment has more retransmissions than a lossless environment
LLN has a lossy natute the rank quality changes frequently and there ETX for path also changes frequently. ETX takes into account the path ETX and can reflect the link status more precisely at any time in RPL network
Packet Delivery Ratio
The Packet Delivery Ratio of ETX is better than OF0 in this small sized simulation
Network setup Time with respect to DIO_INTERVAL_MIN
Network convergence
Energy Consumption
For DIO interval minimum, between 5 and 7 energy consumption keeps on descreasing in a linear fashion. The best Energy comsumption can be observed for DIO Interval minimum of 8 and higher.
Latancy
The Latency decrease from 3.5s to 1.7s between 3 and 6s. This sudden decrease is due to to the reason that lower
values DIO gennerated heavy control traffic . Which causes more radio collisions and the packets need to be buffered
which increase overall latency of the packet along the path
Packet Deliver Ration- Which means to high control overhead the RPL network suffer collisions and therefore PDR is Poor.- However as we increase the DIO interval (6-14) RPL provider a good PDR ratio of more 70%.- PDR falls for DIO of 15 and greaser, The reasin is that the value DIO higher than 14 does not provide q quick network convergence
We can observe that ETX provides better latency and PDR using less Energy than OF0