l1 facility location

41
FACILITY LOCATION 1. NEED & DEFINITION 2. DECISION PROCESS FOR CHOICE OF LOCATION 3. STRATEGIES FOR FACILITY LOCATION 4. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION and 5. LOCATION MODELS

Upload: pallab-prasant

Post on 27-Oct-2014

80 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: L1 Facility Location

FACILITY LOCATION

1. NEED & DEFINITION2. DECISION PROCESS FOR

CHOICE OF LOCATION3. STRATEGIES FOR FACILITY

LOCATION4. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION and5. LOCATION MODELS

Page 2: L1 Facility Location

1. NEED OF PLANT LOCATION?

NEED OF PLANT LOCATION ARISES IN THE FOLLOWING SITUATIONS:-

• STARTING NEW BUSINESS FOR THE FIRST TIME.

• EXPANSION OF BUSINESS.• DIVERSIFICATION OF BUSINESS.• RE-LOCATION DUE TO SCARCITY / NON –

AVAILABILITY OF CRITICAL INPUTS OR DUE TO A CRITICAL INPUT BECOMING UN – ECONOMICAL AT THE PRESENT LOCATION.

Page 3: L1 Facility Location

1A. Facility Location-Defined• PLANT LOCATION MEANS DECIDING A

SUITABLE PLACE WHERE THE PLANT WILL BE HOUSED.

• BEST LOCATION IS ONE THAT RESULTS IN LOWEST COST OF PRODUCTION PER UNIT & HENCE MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN.

• IDEAL LOCATION?

• IMPORTANCE OF LOCATION DECISION.

Page 4: L1 Facility Location

2. DECISION PROCESS FOR CHOICE OF LOCATION

• Identify set of alternatives for various regional locations

• Reduce set using evaluation procedures

• Decide the exact location of site based upon cost considerations

Page 5: L1 Facility Location

Regional Decision• Organizational Strategies• Management Control Considerations• Region Specific Business and Economic Considerations

– Transportation network– Geographical Environment– Compatible industry– Attractiveness of community– Taxes– Economic incentives– Legal restrictions– Cultural factors and

• Cost considerations

Page 6: L1 Facility Location

2a: 2a: Factors That Affect The Site Factors That Affect The Site SelectionSelection

Land requirements VS availabilityLand requirements VS availabilityTopographyTopographyRaw materialRaw materialMarketMarketTransportation costTransportation costLaborLaborPowerPowerWaterWaterClimateClimateProximity of other industryProximity of other industryGovt. restriction and benefits Govt. restriction and benefits andandCultural and cost factors.Cultural and cost factors.

Page 7: L1 Facility Location

3. STRATEGIES FOR FACILITY LOCATION

3.1 SEPARATE FACILITY FOR DIFFERENTPRODUCTS/SERVICES

3.2 SEPARATE FACILITY TO SERVE DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS

3.3 SEPARATE FACILITY FOR MAJOR / CRITICAL INPUTS

Page 8: L1 Facility Location

3.1 SEPARATE FACILITY FOR DIFFERENTPRODUCTS/SERVICES

• Effective Management• Concept of specialization, hence higher

productivity• Profit Center ConceptEXAMPLES:-i. companies like LG, BPL, Videocon have separate

manufacturing units for TVs, Washing Machines, Microwave Ovens & Refrigerators.

ii. ICICI have separate offices for Banking, Insurance & Mutual Funds.

iii. Mahindra & Mahindra have separate units for mfr. Of Tractors, Telecom & Rural Finance

Page 9: L1 Facility Location

3.2 SEPARATE FACILITY TO SERVE DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS

• Transportation Cost is Minimized• Lead Time for supply of goods & services

is reduced.

EXAMPLES:-i. Pepsi & Coca – Colaii. Banks – PNB, SBI, ICICI, HDFC, HSBCiii. Educational Institutions – IIT, BITS, DAViv. Vehicle Service Stations etc.

Page 10: L1 Facility Location

3.3 SEPARATE FACILITY FOR MAJOR / CRITICAL INPUTS

Generally adopted by mfrs. who plan for backward integration.

EXAMPLES:-i. Cement / sugar manufacturing plant

planning to have a mfg. unit for woven sacks.

ii. Tyre mfg. Unit planning to establish a unit for mfr of Carbon Black.

Page 11: L1 Facility Location

4. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION

• Maximization of Profit / Maximization of Revenue / Minimization of Cost

• Dominant Factor and• Proximity to Potential Customers

For Service Facilities:-Cost of access to service facilityCost of delivery of serviceResponse Time

Page 12: L1 Facility Location

Water as a Dominant factor

• One Tonne of Aluminium 40,000 ltrs• One Tonne of Steel Plate 20,000 ltrs• One Tonne of Paper 15,000 ltrs• One Tonne of Sugar 12,000 ltrs• Brew One Barrel of Beer 300 ltrs• One Kwh of Energy 20 ltrs• Tarapur Atomic Power Hs/day 2200 million

ltrs

Page 13: L1 Facility Location

5. LOCATION MODELS1. MEDIAN MODEL2. CENTROID MODEL3. LOCATION FACTOR RATING MODEL4. BREAK EVEN POINT MODEL5. FACTORS’ COST ANALYSIS MODEL6. TRANSPORTATION MODEL7. BRIDGEMAN’S DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

MODEL8. BROWN & GIBSON’S MODEL9. MODIFIED BROWN & GIBSON’S MODEL and10. ARDALAN HEURISTIC MODEL

Page 14: L1 Facility Location

5.1 MEDIAN MODEL

Used to locate a new facility such that Used to locate a new facility such that the total transportation cost between the total transportation cost between the new facility and the existing the new facility and the existing facilities of the organization is facilities of the organization is minimum. minimum.

Based upon the assumption of Based upon the assumption of movement of goods along rectilinear movement of goods along rectilinear direction.direction.

Page 15: L1 Facility Location

FACILITYFACILITY

(F)(F)

LOCATION LOCATION COORDINATESCOORDINATES

(ai & bi)

COSTCOST

(Cui)

ANNUAL LOADANNUAL LOAD

(Li)

BareillyBareilly (10,80)(10,80) 1010 452452

Shah - Shah - jahanpur jahanpur

(30,60)(30,60) 1010 678678

Gonda Gonda (80,50)(80,50) 1010 483483

Kanpur Kanpur (50,10)(50,10) 1010 711711

Sultanpur Sultanpur (80,10)(80,10) 1010 539539

2,8632,863

An Example:

Page 16: L1 Facility Location

FACILITYFACILITY

(F)(F)

LOCATION LOCATION COORDINATESCOORDINATES

(ai & bi)

COSTCOST

(Cui)

ANNUAL LOADANNUAL LOAD

(Li)

BareillyBareilly (10,80)(10,80) 1010 452452

Shah - Shah - jahanpur jahanpur

(30,60)(30,60) 1010 678678

Gonda Gonda (80,50)(80,50) 1010 483483

Kanpur Kanpur (50,10)(50,10) 1010 711711

Sultanpur Sultanpur (80,10)(80,10) 1010 539539

2,8632,863

STEP 1: Find Median Load = (2,863 + 1) 2,863 + 1) ÷ 2 = 1432

Page 17: L1 Facility Location

STEP 1: Find Median Load

STEP 2: Arrange F according to increasing X coordinates and identify for median load being handled

FF ai Li Cum. Load

BareillyBareilly 10 452452 452452

Shah - Shah - jahanpurjahanpur

30 678678 1130

Kanpur Kanpur 50 711711 1841

Gonda Gonda 80 483483 2324

SultanpurSultanpur 80 539539 2863

Median Load = 1432

Page 18: L1 Facility Location

STEP 1: Find Median LoadSTEP 2: Arrange F according to increasing X coordinates and identify

for median load being handled

FF bi Li Cum. Load

Kanpur Kanpur 10 711711 711711

Sultanpur Sultanpur 10 539539 1250

Gonda Gonda 50 483483 1733

Shah Jahanpur Shah Jahanpur 60 678678 2411

BareillyBareilly 80 452452 2863

Median Load = 1432

STEP 3: Arrange F according to increasing Y coordinates and identify for median load being handled

Page 19: L1 Facility Location

5.1 MEDIAN MODEL- steps1. FIND THE MEDIAN OF THE LOAD.2. ARRANGE THE FACILITIES IN THE INCREASING

ORDER OF ‘X’ COORDINATES. FIND THE VALUE OF THE COORDINATE OF

EXISTING FACILITY WHICH SENDS / RECEIVES MEDIAN LOAD IN ‘X’ DIRECTION. THIS IS THE ‘X’ COORDIATE OF THE DESIRED LOCATION.

3. SIMILARLY, FIND THE VALUE OF THE COORDINATE OF EXISTING FACILITY WHICH SENDS / RECEIVES MEDIAN LOAD IN ‘Y’ DIRECTION. THIS IS THE ‘Y’ COORDIATE OF THE DESIRED LOCATION.

4. FIND THE TOTAL COST OF TRANSPORTATION ASSUMING ‘RECTILINEAR MOVEMENT OF MATERIALS / PRODUCTS’.

Page 20: L1 Facility Location

(F)(F) (ai , bi) DistanceDistance

(D)(D)(Cui) (Li) COST=COST=

Dx Dx Cuix Li

BareillyBareilly (10,80)(10,80) [50-10]+[50-10]+

[50- 80] = [50- 80] = 7070

1010 452452 3,16,4003,16,400

ShahShah

Jahanpur Jahanpur

(30,60)(30,60)1010 678678

GondaGonda (80,50)(80,50) 1010 483483

Kanpur Kanpur (50,10)(50,10) 1010 711711

Sultanpur Sultanpur (80,10)(80,10) 1010 539539

Step 4: Find the total cost of transportation for the proposed location (50, 50)

Page 21: L1 Facility Location

(F)(F) (ai , bi) DistanDistancece

(D)(D)

Cost Cost (Cui)

Annual Annual loadload

(Li)

COST=COST=

Dx Dx Cuix Li

BareillyBareilly (10,80)(10,80) 7070 1010 452452 3,16,4003,16,400

ShahShah

Jahanpur Jahanpur

(30,60)(30,60)3030 1010 678678 2,03,4002,03,400

GondaGonda (80,50)(80,50) 3030 1010 483483 1,44,9001,44,900

Kanpur Kanpur (50,10)(50,10) 4040 1010 711711 2,84,4002,84,400

Sultanpur Sultanpur (80,10)(80,10) 7070 1010 539539 3,77,3003,77,300

13,26,40013,26,400

Step 4: Find the total cost of transportation for the proposed location (50, 50)

Page 22: L1 Facility Location

5.2 CENTROID MODEL• Let ai & bi be the coordinates of the existing

facilities and Li be the load being handled by the ith facility.

• Let (X,Y) be the coordinates of the plant being proposed to be located.

• Find the value of the coordinates using the following formulae:-

X = [∑ (Li x ai)]÷ ∑ Li for values of i =1 to m Y = [∑ (Li x bi )]÷ ∑ Li for values of i =1 to m

• Find the total cost of transportation using the following formulae:-

Total Cost = ∑ [Li x √(X-ai)2+(Y- bi)2 . Cui]

Page 23: L1 Facility Location

The centre of gravity modelThe centre of gravity model

X = [∑ (Li x ai)]÷ ∑ Li

=[(10*452)+(30*678)+(80*483)+(50*711)+=[(10*452)+(30*678)+(80*483)+(50*711)+

(80*539)] (80*539)] ÷ 2863 ÷ 2863

= = [4,520+20,340+38,640+35,550+43,120][4,520+20,340+38,640+35,550+43,120] ÷ 28632863

= 1,42,170 = 1,42,170 ÷ 28632863

= = 49.66 49.66

Page 24: L1 Facility Location

Y = [∑ (Li x bi )]Y = [∑ (Li x bi )]÷ ÷ ∑ Li∑ Li

Y = [(80*452)+(60*678)+(50*483)+Y = [(80*452)+(60*678)+(50*483)+ (10*711)+(10*539)](10*711)+(10*539)] = [36,160+40,680+24,150+= [36,160+40,680+24,150+ 7,110+5,390] 7,110+5,390] ÷ 2,8632,863

= 39.64 = 39.64

Page 25: L1 Facility Location

5.3 LOCATION FACTOR RATING MODEL

• LIST THE FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED• RATE THE FACTORS ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 5

(RF)• PREPARE LOCATION RATING (RL) ON

A SCALE OF 1 TO 10 FOR EACH OF THESE FACTORS ACCORDING TO THE BENEFITS EACH LOCATION OFFERS.

• FIND ∑ (RF x RL) FOR EACH LOCATION.• SELECT THE LOCATION WITH THE HIGHEST

SCORE.

Page 26: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 3 8 6 9proximity to suppliers 2 10 9 8wage rates 4 6 8 7labour conditions 3 7 8 6Proximity to customers 4 6 9 10Shipping modes 3 9 9 7Air service 2 5 7 9

Location Rating RL

Location fcator Rating RF

Location Factor Rating

FIND ∑ (RF x RL) FOR EACH LOCATION.

Suggest a suitable site from the three given options

Page 27: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 3 24 18 27proximity to suppliers 2 20 18 16wage rates 4labour conditions 3Proximity to customers 4Shipping modes 3Air service 2

Measure RF x RL

Location fcator Rating RF

Location Factor Rating

Page 28: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 3 24 18 27proximity to suppliers 2 20 18 16wage rates 4 24 32 28labour conditions 3 21 24 18Proximity to customers 4 24 36 40Shipping modes 3 27 27 21Air service 2 10 14 18

Measure RF x RL

Location fcator Rating RF

Location Factor Rating

∑ (RF x RL) = 150, 169, 168 for Site 1, 2 and 3 respectively

Page 29: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 0.3 80 65 90proximity to suppliers 0.2 100 91 75wage rates 0.15 60 95 72labour conditions 0.15 75 80 80Proximity to customers 0.1 65 90 95Shipping modes 0.05 85 92 65Air service 0.05 50 65 90

Score 0 to 100Location fcator Weight

Location Factor Weighted Score Model

Page 30: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 0.3 24 19.5 27proximity to suppliers 0.2 20 18.2 15wage rates 0.15labour conditions 0.15Proximity to customers 0.1Shipping modes 0.05Air service 0.05

Total weighted score

Location fcator WeightWeighted Score

Location Factor Weighted Score Model

Page 31: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 0.3 24 19.5 27proximity to suppliers 0.2 20 18.2 15wage rates 0.15 9 14.25 10.8labour conditions 0.15 11.25 12 12Proximity to customers 0.1 6.5 9 9.5Shipping modes 0.05 4.25 4.6 3.25Air service 0.05 2.5 3.25 4.5

Total weighted score

Location fcator WeightWeighted Score

Location Factor Weighted Score Model

Page 32: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 0.3 24 19.5 27proximity to suppliers 0.2 20 18.2 15wage rates 0.15 9 14.25 10.8labour conditions 0.15 11.25 12 12Proximity to customers 0.1 6.5 9 9.5Shipping modes 0.05 4.25 4.6 3.25Air service 0.05 2.5 3.25 4.5

77.5 80.8 82.05Total weighted score

Location fcator WeightWeighted Score

Location Factor Weighted Score Model

Page 33: L1 Facility Location

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

Climate condition 0.3 24 19.5 27proximity to suppliers 0.2 20 18.2 15wage rates 0.15 9 14.25 10.8labour conditions 0.15 11.25 12 12Proximity to customers 0.1 6.5 9 9.5Shipping modes 0.05 4.25 4.6 3.25Air service 0.05 2.5 3.25 4.5

77.5 80.8 82.05Total weighted score

Location fcator WeightWeighted Score

Location Factor Weighted Score Model

Page 34: L1 Facility Location

Load – Distance Technique

This is a modified form of the CG method.

In this method a single set of site coordinates is not identified. Instead, various sites are evaluated using a load distance value that is a measure of weight and distance (the inputs could come from another method like location factor rating method).

For a single potential site, a load distance value is computed as follows.

1

n

i ii

LD l d

LD = the load distance value

li = load expressed as weight, no. of trips or no. of units being shipped to from the site to the location i

di = the distance between the proposed site and location i

Page 35: L1 Facility Location

Load – Distance Technique

1

n

i ii

LD l d

2 2( ) ( )i i id x x y y

x, y = coordinates of proposed site

xi, yi = coordinates of existing locations

Page 36: L1 Facility Location

Load – Distance TechniqueT

her

e ar

e th

ree

po

ten

tial

sit

es t

o b

e ev

alu

ated

.

ai biSite 1 360 180Site 2 420 450Site 3 250 400

A B C Dai 200 100 250 500

bi 200 500 600 300

Li 75 105 135 60

Consider the following example

Page 37: L1 Facility Location

2 2(200 360) (200 180) 161.2Ad

2 2(100 360) (500 180) 412.3Bd

2 2(250 360) (600 180) 434.2Cd

2 2(500 360) (300 180) 184.4Dd

1

125063n

i ii

LD l d

Load – Distance Technique

(161.2 x 75 + 412.3 x 105 + 434.2 x 135 + 184.4 x 60)

Page 38: L1 Facility Location

1

99789n

i ii

LD l d

1

77555n

i ii

LD l d

Site 2:

Site 3:

Since site 3 has the lowest load distance value, this location would also minimize the transportation costs.

Page 39: L1 Facility Location

Quiz

A B C

X 150 300 400Y 250 100 500W 140 110 170

Find the best possible location of a warehouse to cater to these locations (distances in Km).

It was observed that a warehouse cannot be built within 10 Km radius of the location found using CG method. Compare at least four sites.

Page 40: L1 Facility Location
Page 41: L1 Facility Location